The Nizkor Project: Remembering the Holocaust (Shoah)

Shofar FTP Archive File: people/k/konen.jim/1996/konen.1196


From jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com Fri Nov 15 08:09:41 PST 1996
Article: 90252 of soc.culture.german
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!peerfeed.internetmci.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!news.sgi.com!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.mindspring.com!usenet
From: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com ("Truth")
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german
Subject: Who Rules America?
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 05:31:23 GMT
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc.
Lines: 607
Message-ID: <56gs40$mu4@camel4.mindspring.com>
Reply-To: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: user-168-121-85-52.dialup.mindspring.com
X-Server-Date: 15 Nov 1996 04:38:24 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

There is no greater power in the world today than that wielded by the
manipulators of public opinion in America. No king or pope of old, no
conquering general or high priest ever disposed of a power even
remotely approaching that of the few dozen men who control America's
mass news and entertainment media. 

Their power is not distant and impersonal; it reaches into every home
in America, and  it works its will during nearly every waking hour. It

is the power which shapes and molds the mind of virtually every
citzen, young or old, rich or poor, simple or sophicticated. 

The mass media form for us our image of the world and then tell us
what to think about that image. Essentially everthing we know,or think
we know, about events outside our own neighborhood or circle of
acquaintances comes to us via our daily newspapers,our weekly news
magazine, our radio, or our television. 

It is not just the heavy-handed suppression of certain news stories
>from  our newspapers or the blatant propagandizing fo
history-distorting TV "docudramas" which charaterizes the opinion
-manipulating techniques of the media masters. They exercise both
subtlety and thoroughness in their management which they present to
us.

For example, the way in which the news is covered:which items are
emphasized and which are played down, the reporter's choice of
words,tone of voice, and facial expressions; the wording of headlines
; the choice of illustrations - all of these things subliminally and
yet profoundly affect the way in which we interpret what we see or
hear.
On top of this,of course, the columnist and editors remove remaining
doubt from our minds as to just what we are to think about it all.
Employing carefully developed psychological thechniques , they guide
our thought and opininion so that we can be in tune with the "in"
crowd, the "beautiful people", the "smart money." They let us know
exactly what our attitudes should be toward various types of people
and behavior in the context of a TV drama or situation comedy and
having the other TV characters react to them in the Politically
Correct way

For example, a racially mixed couple will be respected ,liked, and
socially sought after by other characters, as will a "take charge" 
black scholar or businessman, or a sensitive and talented homosexual,
or a poor but honest and hardworking illegal alien from Mexico. On the
other hand, a White racist - that is, any racially conscious White
person who looks in askance as miscegenation or at thr rapidly
darkening racial situation in America - is portrayed, at best, as a
despicable bigot who is reviled by the characters,or at worst, as a
dangerous psychopath who is fascinated by firearms and is a menace to
all law -abidiing citizens. The white racist "gun nut" in fact, has
become a familiar stereotype of TV shows. 

The average American , of whose daily life TV- watching takes such an
unhealty portion, distinguishes between these fictional situations and
reality only with dificulty, if at all. He responds to the telivised
actions ,statements and, attitudes of TV actors much as he does to his
own peers in real life. For all too many Americans the real world has
been replaced by the false reality that his urge to conform responds.
Thus, when a TV scriptwriter expresses approval fo some ideas and
actions through the TV characters for whom he writing, and disapproval

of others, he exerts a powerful pressure on millions of viewers toward
conformity with his own views.

And as it is with TV entetainment, so it is also with the news,
whether televised or printed. The insidious thing about this form of
thought control is that even when we realize that entertainment or
news is biased, the media masters still are able to manipulate most of
us. This is because they not only slant what they present, but they
establish tacit boundaries and ground rules for the permissable
spectrum of opinion. 

As an example, consider the media treatment of Middle East news. Some
editors or commentators are slavishly  pro-Israel in their every
utterance, while others seem neutral. No one, however, dares suggest
that the United States is on the wrong side in the Arab-Jewish
conflict and that it served Jewish interests rather than American
interests  to send US forces to cripple Iraq, Israel'  principal rival
in the Middle East.  Thus, a spectrum of permissible opinion, from a
pro-Israel to nearly neutral , is established. 
 
Another example is the media treatment of racial issues  in the United
States . Some  commentators seem almost dispassionate in reporting
news of racial strife, while others are emotionally partisan - with
partisanship always on the non-white side. All of the media spokesmen
without exception , however, take the position that 'multcultralism'
and racial mixing are here to stay, and that they are good things

Because there are differences in degree,however, most Americans fail
to realize that they are being manipulated. Even the citizen who
complains about "managed news" and "biased media" falls into the trap
of thinking that because he presented with an apparent spectrum of
opinion he can escape the thought controllers' influence by believing
the editor or commetator of his choice(hence Jewish playpen) It's a 
"heads I win, tails you lose"  situation. Every point on the
permissible spectrum of public opinion is acceptable to the media
masters - and no impermissable fact or viewpoint is allowed any
exposure at all, if they can prevent it. 

The control of the opinion -molding media is nearly monolithic. All of
the controlled media - television , radio , newspapers, magazines,
books, motion pictures - speak with a single voice , each reinforcing
the other. Despite the appearance of variety, there is no real
dissent, no alternative source of facts or ideas accessible to the
great mass of people which might allow them to form opinions at odds
with those of the media masters. They are presented with a single view
of the world - a world in which every voice proclaims the equality of
races, the inerrant nature of the Jewish "Holocaust" tale, the
wickedness of attempting to halt a flood of non-White aliens from
pouring across our borders, the danger of permitting citizens to keep
and bear arms, the moral equivalances of all sexual orientations, and
the desirability of a "pluralistic", cosmospolitan society rather than
a homogenous one. It is the view of the world designed by the media
masters to suit their own ends - and the pressure to conform to that
view is overwhelming. People adapt their opinions to it,  vote in
accord with it, and shape their lives to fit it. 

And who are these all-powerful masters of the media? As we shall see,
to a very large extent they are Jews.

Electronic New and Entertainment Media

Continuing government deregulation of the telecommunicatons  industry
has resulted, not in touted increased competition , but rather in an
accelerating wave of caroporate mergers and acquistions that have
produced a handful of multi-billion-dollar media congomerates.
Whenever you watch television , wheter from a local broadcating
station or a via cable or satelite dish; whenever you see a featrue
film in a theater or at home; whenever you listen to the radio or
recorded music; whenever you read a newspaper, book, or magazine - it
is very likely that the information or entertainment you receive was
produced and/ or distributed by one of these megamedia companies.

The largest media conglomerate today is Walt Disney Company, whoese
chairman and CEO, Michael Eisner, is a Jew. The Disney empire, headed
by a man described by one media anlyst as "a control freak", includes
several television production companies( Walt Disney Television,
Touchstone Television, Buean Vista Television), it own cable network
with 14 million subsribers, and two video prodution companies. 

As for feature films, the Walt Disney Picture Group, headed by Joe
Roth(also a Jew), includes Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures,
and Caravan pictures. Disney also owns Miramax Films, run by the
Weinstein brothers, who have produced such ultra-raunchy movies as the
"Crying Game", "Priests" and "Kids."

When the Disney Company was run by the Gentile Disney family prior to
its takeover by Eisner in 1984, it epitomized wholesome, family
entertainment. While it still holds the rights to "Snow White", under
Eisner the company has expanded into the production of graphic  sex
and gratutious violence. In addition to TV and movies, the corporation
owns Disneyland, Disney World, Epcot Center, Tokyo Disneyland, and
Euro Disney. 

Disney also sell annually well over a billion dollars worth of
consumer products:books,toys and clothing. In August 1995 Eisner
acquired Capital Cities/ABC, Inc, to create a media empire with annual
sales of $16.5 billion. Capital Cities/ABC owns the ABC Television
Network, which in turn owns ten TV stations outright in such big
markets as New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, and Houston.
In addition, it has 225 affiliated stations in the United States and
is part owner of several European TV comapnies.

ABC's cable subsidiary, ESPN, is headed by president and CEO Steven
Bornstein, who is a Jew. The coporation also has a controlling share
of Lifetime Television and the Arts & Entertainment  Network cable
companies. ABC Radio Network owns 11 AM and ten FM stations, again in
major cities such as New York, Washington, and Los Angeles and has
over 3,400 affiliates.

Although primarily a telecommunications company. Capital Cities/ABC
earned over $1 billion in publishing in 1994. It owns seven daily
newspapers, Fairchild Publications(Women's Wear Daily), Chilton
Publications(automotive manuels), and the Diversified Publishing
Group. 
Time Warner,Inc, is the second of the international media leviathans.
The chairman of the board and CEO, Gerald M. Levin, is a Jew. Time
Warner's subsidiary HBO is country's largest pay-TV cable network. 
Warner Music is by far the world's largest record company, with 50
labels, the biggest of which is Warner Brothers Records, headed by
Danny Goldberg. Stuart Hersch is president of Warnervision, Warner
Music's video production unit. Goldberg and Hersch are both Jews. 

Warner Music was an early promoter of "gangsta rap"." Through its
involvement with Interscope Records it helped popularize a genre whose
graphic lyrics explicitly urge Blacks to commit acts of violence
against whites. 
In addition to cable and music, Time Warner is heavily involved in the
production of feature films(Warner Brothers Studio) and publishing.
Time Warner's publishing division(editor-in-chief Norman Pearlstine, a
Jew) is the largest magazine publisher in the country(Time, Sports
Illustrated, People, Fortune) 

Levin maybe the number one magnate if the planned deal with Turner
Broadcating System is completed.(Merger finalized as of 1996). 
When Ted Turner, the Gentile media maverick, made a bid to buy CBS in
1985, there was panic in media boardrooms across the nation. Turner
had made a fortune in advertising and the had built a successful
cable-TV news network, CNN. Although Turner employed a number of Jews
in key excutive positions in CNN and had never taken public positions
contrary to Jewish interests, he is man with a large ego and  strong
personality and was regarded by Chairman William Paley and other Jews
at CBS as uncontrollable: a loose cannon who might at some time in the
future turn against them. Furthermore, Jewish newsmam Daniel Schorr,
who had worked for Turner, publicly charged that his former boss held
a personal dislike for Jews. 
To block Turner's bid CBS executives invited billionaire Jewish
theater, hotel,insurance and cigarette magnate Laurence Tisch to
launch a "friendly" takeover of the company, and from 1986 til 1995
Tisch was chairman and CEO of CBS, removing any threat of non-Jewish
influence there. Subsequent efforts by Turner to acquire a major
network have been obstructed by Levin's Time Warner, which owns nearly
20 percent of CBS stock and has veto power over major deals. 
Thus, despite being being an innovator and garnering headlines, Turner
has nerver commanded the wealth and power to be a true media master. 
Turner may have decided: "if you can't lick 'em join 'em" If TBS
merges with Time Warner, Levin will become Turner's boss, and CNN, the
only rival to the network news, will come under complete Jewish
control.(deal finalized) 
Viacom, Inc, headed by Sumner Redstone(born Murray Rothstein), is the
third largest megamedia corporation in corporation in the country,
with revenues of over $10 billion a year. Viacom, which produces and
distributes TV programs for the three largest networks, own 12
television stations and 12 radio stations. It produces feature films
through Paramount Pictures, headed by Jewess Sherry Lansing
Its publishing division includes Prentice Hall, Simon & Schuster,and
Pocket Books. It distributes videos through over 4, 000 blockbuster
stores. It is also involved in satellite broadcasting, theme parks,
and video games. 
Viacom's chief claim to fame, however, is as the world's largest
provider of cable programming, thorough its showtime, MTV,
Nickelodeon, and other networks. Since 1989 MTV and Nickelodeon have
acquired larger and larger shares of the juvenile television audience.
Redstone, who actually owns 76 per cent of the shares of Viacom($3
billiion), offers Beavis and Butthead as teen role models and is the
largest single purveyor of race-mixing propaganda to White teenagers
and sub-teens in America and Europe. MTV pumps its racially mixed rock
and rap videos into 210 million homes in 71 countries and is the
dominant culural influence on teenagers around the world. 
Nickelodean has by far the largest share of the four-to-11-year-old TV
audience in America and also is expandind rapidly into Europe. Most of
its shows do not yet display the blatant degeneracy which is MTV's
trademark, but Redstone is gradually nudging the fare presented to his
kiddie viewers toward the same poison purveyed by MTV.
With the top three, and by far the largest, media conglomerates in the
hands of Jews, it is difficult to believe that such an overwhelming
degree of control came about without a deliberate, concerted effort on
their part. 
What about the other big media companies? 
Number four on the list is Rupert Murdoch's News corporation, which
owns FOX Television Network and 20th Century Fox Films. Murdoch is a
gentile , but Peter Chernin, who heads Murdoch's film studio and also
oversees his TV production, is a Jew. 
Number five is the Japanese Sony Corporation, whose U.S.
subsidiary , Sony Corporation of America, is run by Michael Schulhof,
a Jew. Alan J Levine, another Jew, heads the Sony Pictures division.
Most of the television and movie production companies that are not
owned by the largest corporations are also controlled by Jews. For
example, New World Entertainment,proclaimed by one media analyst as
"the premiere independent TV program producer in the United States,"
is owned by Ronald Perelman, a Jew who also owns Revelon cosmetics.
The chairman at New World, Brandon Tartikoff(formerly head of
entertainment programming at NBC), is a Jew. The best known of the
smaller media companies, Dreamworks SKG, is a strictly kosher affair.
Dream Works was formed in 1994 amid great media hype by recording
industry mogul David Geffen,former Disney Pictures chairman Jeffrey
Katzenberg, and film director Steven Spielberg , all three of whom are
Jews. The company produces movies, annimated films,television
programs, and recorded music. Considering cash and connections that
Geffen, Katzenberg and Spielberg have, Dream Works may soon be in the
same league as the big three. 
Two other large production companies, MCA and Universal Pictures, are
both by Seagram Company, Ltd. The president and CEO of Seagram, the
liquor giant, is Edgar Bronfman Jr, who is also president of the World
Jewish Congress.
It is well known that Jews have controlled production  and
distribution of films since the inception of the movie industry in the
early decades of this century. This is still the case today. 
Films produced by just the five largest motion picture companies
mentioned above - Disney, Warner Brothers, Sony,Paramount(Viacom), and
universal(Seagram) - accounted for 74 per cent of the total box-office
receipts for the year to date(August 1995).
The big three in Television network broadcasting  used to be ABC, CBS,
and NBC. With the consolidation of the media empires, these three are
no longer independent, however, each was controlled by a Jew  since
its inception:ABC by Leonard Goldenson,CBS by William Palley and then
by Laurence Tisch, and NBC first by David Sarnoff and the by his son
Robert. Over periods of several decades these networks were staffed
>from  top to bottom with Jews. , and the essential Jewishness of
network television did not change when the networks were absorbed by
other corporations. The Jewish presence in television news remains
particularly strong. 
AS note ,ABC is part of Eisner's Disney Company, and the executive
producers of ABC's news programs are all Jews. Victor S Neufeld(20-20)

Bob Reichbloom(Good Morning America), and Rick Kaplan(World News
Tonight).
CBS was recently purchased by Westinghouse Electric Corporation.
Nevertheless, the man appointed by Laurence Tisch, Eric Ober, remains
president of CBS News, and Ober is a Jew. 
At NBC, now owned by General Electric, NBC News president Andrew Lack
is a Jew, as are executive producers Jeff Zucker(Today), Jeff
Gralnick(NBC Nightly News), and Neal Shapiro(Dateline)

THE PRINT MEDIA 

After television news, daily newspapers are the most influential
information medium in America. Sixty million of them are sold(and
presumably read) each day. These millions are divided among some 1,500
different publications. One might conclude that the the sheer number
of different newspapers across America would provide a safeguard
against minority control and distortion. Alas, such is not the case.
There is less independence, less  competition, and much less
representation of majority interests than a casual observer would
think. 
The days when most cities and even towns had several independently
owned newspapers published by local people with close ties to the
community are gone. Today most "local" newspapers are owned by a
rather small number small number of large companies thousands of miles
away. The fact is that only about 25 per cent of the country's 1,5000
papers are independently  owned; the rest have circulation belong to
multi-newspaper chains. Only 100 of the total number have circulations
of more than 100,000. Only a handful are large enough to maintain
independent reporting staff's outside their own communities: the rest
must depend on these few for all their national and international
news. 
In only 50 cities in America are there more than one daily newspaper,
and competition is frequently nominal even among them, as between
morning and afternoon editions under the same ownership. Examples of
this are are the Huntsville, Alabama, morning News and afternoon
Times; the Birmingham, Alabama morning post Herald and afternoon
Herald-Journal - all owned by the  Jewish Newhouse brothers through
their holding , Advance publications. 
The Newhouse media empire provides an example of more than the lack of
real competition among America's daily newspapers: it also illustrates
the isatiable appetite Jews have shown for all organs of opinion
control on which they could fasten their grip. The Newhouses own 26
daily newspapers, including several large and important ones, such as
the Cleavland Plain Dealer, the Newark Star -Ledger , and  the New
Orleans Times-Picayunne;the nation's largest trade book publishing
conglomerate,Random House, with all its subsidiaries; Newhouse
Broadcating, consisting of 12 television broadcating stations and 87
cable-TV systems, including some of the country's largest cable
networks; the sunday supplement "Parade", with a circulation of more
than 22 million copies per week;  some two dozen major magazines,
including the New Yorker, Vogue, Mademoiselle, Glamour, Vanity Fair,
Bride's, Gentlemen's Quaterly, Self, House & Garden, and all the other
magazines of the wholly owned Conde Nast group. 
This Jewish media empire was founded by the late Sumuel Newhouse, an
immigrant from Russia. When he died in 1979 at the age of 84, he
bequethed media holdings worth an estimated $1.3 billion to his two
sons, Samuel and Donald. With a number of further acquisitions , the
net worth of Advance Publications has grown to a more than $8 billion
today. 
The gobbling up of so many newspapers by the Newhouse family was in
large degree made possible  by the fact that newspapers are not
supported by their subscribers, but by their advertisers . It is
advertising revenue - not the small change collected from newspaper's
readers - that largely pays the editor's salary and yields the owner's
profit. 
Whenever the large abvertisers in a city choose to favor one newspaper
over another with their business, the favored newspaper will flourish
while its competitor dies. Since the begenning of this century, when
Jewish mercantile power in America became a dominant economic force,
there has been a steady rise in the number of American newspapers in
Jewish hands, accompanied by a steady decline in the number of
competing Gentile newspapers - primarily as a result of selective
advertising policies of Jewish merchants. 
Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership and
management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising revenue
that their editorial and news reporting policies are largely
constrained by Jewish likes and dislikes. It holds true in the
newspaper business as elsewhere that he who pay the pipe calls the
tune. 

Three Jewish Newspapers

The suppresion of competition and the establishment of local
monopolies on the dissemination of news and opinion have characterized
the rise of Jewish control over America's newspapers. The resulting
ability of the Jews to use the press as an unopposed instrument of
Jewish policy could hardly be better illustrated than by the examples
of the nation's three most prestigious and influential newspapers: The
New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post.
These three,dominating America's financial and capitals, are the
newspapers set the trends and guidelines for nearly all the others.
They are the ones which decide what is news and what isn't, at the
national and international levels. They originate the news; the others
merely copy it. And all three newspapers are in Jewish hands. 
The New York Times is the unofficial social, fashion, enterainment,
political, and cultural guide of the nation. It tells America's "smart
set" which books to buy and which films to see; which opinions are in
style at the moment; which politicians, educators, spiritual leaders,
artists, and businessmen are the real comers. And for a few decades in
the last century it was a genuinely American newspaper. 
The New York Times was founded in 1851 by two Gentiles, Henry J
Raymond and George Jones. After their deaths, it was purchased in 1896
form Jones's estate by a wealthy Jewish publisher, Adolph Ochs. His
great-grandson, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr., is the paper's current
publisher and CEO. The executive editor is Max Frankel, and the
managing editor is Joseph Lelyveld. Both of the latter also are Jews. 
The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York Times Co.,33
other newspapers, including the Boston Globe, purchased in June of
1993 for $1.1 billion; twelve magazines, including McMcall's and
Family Circle with circulations of more than 5 million each; seven
radio stations and TV broadcasting stations; a cable-TV system; and
three book publishing companies. The New York Times News Service
transmits news stories, features, and photographs from New York Times
by wire to 506 other newspapers, news agencies, and magazines.
Of similar national importance is the Washington,which, by
establishing its "leaks" throughout government agencies in Washington,
has inside track on news involving the Federal government.
The Washington Post, like the New York Times, had a non-Jewish origin.
It was established in 1877 by Stilson Hutchins, purchased from him in
1905 by John R McClean, and later inheireted by Edward B. McLean. In
June 1933, however, at the height of the Great Depression, the
newspaper was forced into bankruptcy. It was purchased at a bankruptcy
auction by infamous Eugene Meyer, a Jewish financier and former
partner of the infamous Bernard Baruch, industry czar in American
during the First World War. 
The Washington Post is now run by Katerine Meyer Graham, Eugene
Meyer's daughter. She is the principal stockholder and the board
chairman of the Washington Post Co. In 1979 she appointed her son,
Donald, publisher of the paper. He now also holds the posts of
president and CEO of the Washington Post Co. 
The Washington Post Co. has a number of other media holdings in
newspapers, television, and magazines, most notably the nation's
number-two weekly newsmagazine, Newsweek. In a joint venture with the
New York Times, the Post publishes the International Herald Tribune,
the most widely distributed English language daily in the world. 
The Wall Street Journal, which sells 1.8 million copies each weekday,
is the nation's largest-circulation daily newspaper. It is owned by
Dow Jones & Company, Inc, a New York corporation which also publishes
24  other daily newspapers and the weeky financial tabloid Barron's,
among other things. The chairman and CEO of Dow Jones is Peter R.
Kann, who is a Jew. Kann also holds the posts of chairman and
publisher of the Wall Street Journal. 
Most of New York' other major newspapers are in no better hands than
the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. In January 1993 the
New York Daily News was bought from the estate of the late Jewish
media mogul Robert Maxwell(born Ludvik Hoch) by Jewish real-estate
developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman. The Village Voice is the property of
Leonard Stern, the billionaire Jewish owner of the Hartz Mountain pet
supply firm. 

Other Mass Media 

The story is pretty much the same for other media as it is for
televison, radio, and newspapers. Consider, for example,
newsmagazines. There are only three of any note published in the
United States; Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report. 
Time, with  a weekly ciurculation of 4.1 million, is publlished by a
subsidiary of Time Warner Communications, the new media conglomerate
formed the 1989 merger of Time, Inc, with Warner Communications. 
The CEO of Time Warner Communications, as mentioned above, is Gerald
Levin, a Jew. 
Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington Post
Company, under Jewess Katherine Meyer Graham. Its weekly circulation
is 3.2 million.
U.S. News & World Report, with a weekly circulation of 2.3 million, is
owned and published by the aforementioned Mortimer B. Zuckerman, who
also has taken the position of the editor-in-chief of the magazine for
himself. Zuckerman also owns the Atlantic Monthly and New York's
tabloid newspaper, the Daily News, which is the sixth-largest paper in
the country. 
Or consider books. There are literally thousands of publishers in the
United States, and among these thousands are many with little or no
direct Jewish control;  there are some which acutually dare to publish
books not approved by the Jewish Establishment. But all of the latter
publishers are very small, and their books seldom reach the great mass
of American who buy their reading material from drugstore news racks
or from chain store bookstores. 
Among the giant publishing conglomerates, however, the situation is
quite kosher. Three of the six largest book publishers in the United
States, according Publishers Weekly, are owned or controlled by Jews.
The three are first-place Random House(with its many subsidiaries,
including Crown Publishing Group), third-palce Simon & Schuster and
sixth place  Time Warner. Trade Group(including Warner Books and
Little, Brown) 
As pointed out above, the Newhouse family owns Random House, and
Gerald Levin is CEO of Time Warner Communications, of which Time
Warner Trade Group is a division. Simon & Schuster is subsidiary of
Viacom ,Inc, of which the chairman and CEO is Sumner Redstone, as
already noted. Another publisher of special significance is Western
Publishing. Although it ranks only 13th in size among all U.S.
publishers, it ranks first among publishers of childern's books, with
more than 50 per cent of the market. Its chairman and CEO is Richard
Snyder, a Jew, who just replaced Richard Bernstein, also a Jew. 

Our Responsibility

Those are the facts of media control in America. Anyone willing to
spend a few hours in a large library looking into current editions of
yearbooks on the radio adn television industries and directories of
newspapers and magazines; into registers of corporations and their
officers, such as those published by Standard and Poors and by Dun and
Bradstreet; and into standard biographical reference works can verify
their accuracy. They are undeniable, and when confronted with them
Jewish Spokesmen customarily will use evasive tactics. "Ted Turner
isn't a Jew!" they will announce triumphantly, as if that settled the
issue. If pressed further they will accuse the confronter of
"anti-Semitism" for even raising the subject. It is fear of this
accusation which keeps many persons silent who know the facts. 
But we must not remain silent on this most important of issues!   
The Jewish control of the American mass is the single most important
fact of life, not just in America, but in the whole world today. There
is nothing - plague,famine, economic collapse, even nuclear war - more
dangerous to the future of our people.
By permitting the Jews to control our news and entertainment media we
are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence on our
political system and virtual control of our  government; we also are
giving them control of the minds and souls of our childern, whose
attitudes and ideas are shaped more by Jewish television and Jewish
films than by parents, schools, or any other influence. 
The Jew-controlled entertainment media have taken the lead in
persuading a whole generation that homosexuality is a normal and
acceptable way of life; that there is nothing at all wrong  with a
White woman dating or marrying a black man, or with White men marrying
Asiactic women; that all races are inheirently equal in ability and
character - except that the character of the White race is suspect
because of a history of oppressing other races; and that any effort by
Whites at racial self-presevation is reprehensible.
We must oppose the spreading of this poison among our people, and we
must break the power of those who are spreading it. It would be
intolerable for such power to be in the hands of any alien minority,
with values and interests different from our own. But to permit Jews,
with their 3,000 year history of nation-wrecking, from ancient Egypt
to Russia, to hold such power over us is tantamount to suicide.
Indeed, the fact that so many White Americans today are so filled with
a sense of racial guilt and self-hatred that they actively seek the
death of their own race is a deliberate consequence of Jewish media
control. 
Once we have absorbed and understood the fact of Jewish media control,
it is our inescapable responsibility to do whatever is necessary to
break that control. We must shrink from nothing in combatting this
evil power. which has fastened its deadly grip on our people and is
injecting its lethal poison into their minds and souls. If we fail to
destroy it, it will certainly destroy us. 

Comment:
And you thought the politicians were running the show? Ha!



































































From jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com Fri Nov 15 08:12:24 PST 1996
Article: 91235 of soc.culture.jewish
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!nic.win.hookup.net!noc.van.hookup.net!laslo.netnet.net!node2.frontiernet.net!news.texas.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.mindspring.com!usenet
From: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com ("Truth")
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
Subject: What is 'Holocaust Denial'?
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 06:32:20 GMT
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc.
Lines: 255
Message-ID: <56bmtj$meo@camel4.mindspring.com>
Reply-To: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: user-168-121-85-52.dialup.mindspring.com
X-Server-Date: 13 Nov 1996 05:38:59 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

In recent years, more and more attention has been devoted to the
supposed danger of "Holocaust denial." Politicians, newspapers and
television warn about the growing influence of those who reject
the Holocaust story that some six million European Jews were
systematically exterminated during the Second World War, most of 
them in gas chambers.

In Several countries, including Isreal, France, Germany and Austria,
"Holocaust denial" is against the law, and "deniers" have been
punished with stiff fines and prison sentences. Some frantic Jewish
community leaders are calling for similar government measures in North
America against defiant "revisionist." In Canada,David Matas, Senior
Counsel for the "League for Human Rights" fo the Zionist B'nai B'rith
organization, says:
    
        The Holocaust was the murder of six million Jews, including  
         two million childern. Holocaust denial is a second murder of
         those same six million. First their lives were extinguished;
         then their deaths. A person who denies the Holocaust becomes
         part of the crime of the Holocaust itself.

Often overlooked in this controversy is the crucial question: Just
what contitutes "Holocaust denial"?

Six Million?

Should someone be considered a "Holocaust denier" because he does not
believe, as Matas and others insist, that six million Jews were
killed during World War II? This figure was cited by the International
Military Tribunal at Nuremberg in 1945 and 1946. It found that "the
policy pursued(by the German government) resulted in the killing of
six million Jews, of which four million were killed in the
extermination institutions."

Yet if that is so, then several of the most prominent Holocaust
historians could be regarded as "deniers." Professor Raul Hilberg,
author of the standard reference work,"The Destruction of the European
Jews",does not accept that six million Jews died. He puts the total
of deaths(by all causes) at 5.1 million. Gerald  Reitlinger, author of
the "The Final Solution", likewise did not accept the six million
figure. He estimated the figure of Jewish wartime dead might be as
high as 4.6 million, but admitted that this was conjectural due to a
lack of reliable information. 

Human Soap?

Is someone a "Holocaust denier" if he says that the Nazis didn't use
the body fat from from the corpses of "Holocaust victims" to make 
soap? After weighing all the evidence(including an actual bar of soap
supplied  by the Soviets), the Nuremberg Tribunal declared in its
judgement  that "in some instances attempts were made to utilize the
fat from the bodies of the victims in the commercial manufacture of
soap."  In 1990, though, Israel's official "Yad Vashem" Holocaust
memorial agency "rewrote history" by admitting that the soap was not 
made from human fat story was not true. "Historians have concluded
that soap was not made from human fat. When so many people deny the 
Holocaust ever happened, why give them something to use against the 
truth?", said Yad Vashem official Shmuel Krakowski. 

Wannsee Conference?

Is someone a "holocaust denier" if he does not accept  that the
January 1942  "Wannsee conference" of German bureaucrats was held to
set or coordinate a program of sytematic mass murder of Europe's Jews?
If so, Israeli Holocaust historian Yehuda Bauer must be wrong - and a
"Holocaut denier"  - because he recently declared: "The public still
repeats, time after time, the silly story that at Wannsee the
extermination of the Jews was arrived at." In Bauer's opinion, Wannsee
was a meeting but "hardly a conference" and "little of what was said
there was executed in detail."

Extermination Policy?

Is someone a "Holocaust denier" if he says that there was no order by
Adolf Hitler to exterminate Europe's Jews? There was a time when the
answer would have been yes. Hololcaust historian Raul Hilberg, for
example, wrote in the 1961 edition of his study,"The Destruction of
the European Jews",that there were two orders decreed by Adolf Hitler
for the destruction of Europe's Jews: the first given in the spring of
1941, and the second shortly thereafter. But Hilberg removed mention
of any such order from the revised, three-volume edition of his book
published in 1985. As Holocaust historian Christopher Browning has 
noted:

    In the edition, all references in the text to a Hitler decision or

    Hitler order for the "Final Solution" have been systematically  
    excised. Buried at the bottom of a single footnote stands the 
    solitary reference: "Chronology and circumstances point to a 
    Hitler decision before the summer ended." In the new edition,
    decisions were not made and orders were not given. 

A lack of hard evidence for an extermination order by Hitler has
contributed to a controversy that divides Holocaust historians into
"intentionallists" and  "functionalists."  The former contends that
there was a premeditated extermination policy ordered by Hitler, while
the latter holds that Germany's wartime "final solution" Jewish policy
evolved at lower levels in response to circumstances. But the crucial
point here is this: notwithstanding the capture of literally tons of
German documents after the war, no one can point to documentary
evidence of a wartime extermination order,plan or program. This was 
admitted by professor Hilberg during his testimony in the 1985 trial
in Toronto of German-Canadian publisher Ernst Zundel.

Aushwitz
 
So just what constitutes "Holocaust denial"?
Surely a claim that most Auschwitz inmates died from disease and not
systematic extermination in gas chambers would be "denial." But
perhaps not. Jewish historian Arno J. Mayer, a Princeton University
professor, wrote in his 1988 study, "Why Did the Heavens Not Darken?":
The "Final Solution" in History: "..From 1942 to 1945, certainly at
Auschwitz, but probably overall,more Jews were killed by so called
'natural' causes than by 'unnatural' ones."

Even estimates of the number of people who died at Auschwitz,
allegedly the main extermination center, are no longer clear cut. 
At the postwar Nuremberg Tribunal, the Allies charged that the Germans
exterminated four million people at Auschwitz. Until 1990, a memorial
plaque at Aushwitz read: "Four Million People suffered and Died Here
at the hands of the Nazi murderers between the years 1940 and 1945."
During a 1979  visist to the camp, Pope John Paul II stood before this
memorial and blessed the four million victims.

Is it "Holocaust denial" to dispute these four million deaths? Not
today. In July 1990, the Polish government's Auschwitz State Museum,
along with Israel's Yad Vashem Holocaust center, conceded that the 
four million was a gross exageration, and references to it were
accordingly removed from the Auschwitz monument. Israeli and Polish
officials announced a tentative revised  toll of 1.1 million Aushwitz
dead. In 1993 , French Holocaust researcher Jean-Claude Pressac, in a
much discussed book about Aushcwitz, estimated that altogether about
775,000 died there during the War years.

Professor Mayer acknowledges that the question of how many really died
in Auschwitz remains open. In "Why the Heavens Not Darken?" he
wrote(p.366):

    ... Many questions remain open ... All in all, how many bodies 
         were cremated in Aushwitz? How many died there all told?
         What was the national ,religious, and ethnic breakdown in 
         this commonwealth of victims? How many of them were condemned

         to die a 'natural' death and how many were deliberately 
         slaughtered? And what was the proportion of Jews among
         those murdered in cold blood among these gassed? We have 
         simply no answers to these questions at this time.       

Gas Chambers 

What about denying the existence of extermination "gas chambers"?
Here too, Mayer makes a startling statement (on page 362 of his book):
"Sources for the study of the gas chambers are at once rare and
unreliable." While Mayer believes that such chambers did exist at 
Auschwitz, he points out that most of what is known is based on the
depositions of Nazi officials and executioners at postwar trials and
on the memory of survivors and bystanders. This testimony must be
screened carefully, since it can be influenced by subjective factors
of great complexity. 

Hoss Testimony 

One example of this might be the testimony of Rudolf Hoss , an SS
officer who served as commandant of Auschwitz. In its Judgement, the 
Nuremberg Internatinal Military Tribunal quoted at length from his
testimony to support its findings of extermination. 

It is now well established that Hoss' crucial testimony, as well as
his so-called  "confession" (which was also cited by the Nuremberg
Tribunal), are not only false, but were obtained by beating the former

commandant nearly to death. Hoss wife and childern were also
threatened with death and deportation to Siberia. In his statement,
which would not be admissible today in any United States court of law,

Hoss claimed that the exterminations were already underway at a camp
called "Wolzek" at the time he was ordered to establish extermination
facilities at Auschwitz. In fact, no such camp camp ever existed. He
further claimed that during the the time that he was commandant of 
Aushwitz, two and half million people were exterminated there, and
that a further half million died of disease.
Today reputable historian upholds these figures. Hoss was obviously
willing to say anything,sign anything and do anything to stop the
torture, and to try save himself and his family.

Forensic Investigations

In his 1988 book,Professor Mayer calls for "excavations at the killing
sites and in their immediate evirons" to determine more about the gas
chambers. In fact, such forensic studies have been made. The first was
conducted in 1988 by American execution equipment consultant, Fred A.
Leuchter, Jr. He carried out an on-site forensic examination fo
alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek to determine
if they could have been used to kill people as claimed. After a
careful study of the alleged killing facilities, Leucter concluded
that the sites were not used, and could not have been used, as
homicidal gas chambers. Furthermore, an analysis of samples taken by
Leuchter from the wall and floors of the alleged gas chambers showed
either no or miniscule traces of cyanide compound, from the active
ingredient of Zyklon B, the pesticide allegedly used to murder Jews at

Auschwitz. 

A confidential forensic examination (and subsequent report)
commissioned by the Auschwitz State Museum and conducted by Institute 
of Forensic Research in Krakow  has confirmed Leuchter's finding that
minimal or no traces of cyanide compound can be found in the sites
alleged to have been gas chambers. 

The significance of this is evident when the results of the forensic
examination of the alleged homicidal gas chambers are compared with
the results of the examination of the Auschwitz disinfestation
facilitites, where Zyklon B was used to delouse mattresses and
clothing. Whereas no or only trace amounts of cyanide were found in
the alleged homicidal gas chambers, massive traces of cyanide were
found in the walls and floor in the camp's disinfestation delousing
chambers. 

German chemist Germar Rudolf carried out a forensic study of his own.
On the basis of his on-site examination and analysis of samples, the
certified chemist and doctoral candidate concluded: "For chemical
-technical reasons, the claimed mass gassings with hydrocyanic acid in

the alleged 'gas chambers' in Auschwitz did not take place. The
supposed facilities for mass killing in Auschwitz and Birkenau were
not suitable for this purpose.
Finally, there is a study by Austrian engineer Walter Luftl, a
respected expert witness in numerous  court cases, and former
president of Austria's professional association of engineers. 
In 1992 report he called the alleged mass extermination of Jews in gas

chambers"technically impossible."

Discredited Perspective 

So just what constitutes "Holocaust denial"?Those who advocate
criminal persecution of "Holocaust deniers" seem to be still living in
the world of 1946, where the Allied officials of the Nuremberg
Tribunal have just pronounced their verdict. But the Tribunal's
findings can no longer be assumed to be valid. Because it relied so
heavily on such untrustworthy evidence as the Hoss testimony, some of
its most critical findings are now discredited.

Comment: 
There is a very real and growing cotroversy about what actually
happened to Europe's Jews during World War II. We believe the
"Holocaust" cotroversy should be resolved through free inquiry and
open debate in any forum(i.e. Newsgroups) that pertains to the
"holocaust" in one fashion or another.
 
 Brought to you by: 
The Institute of Historical Review  and The Noontide Press.
PO Box 2739
Newport Beach, California 92659           



From jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com Fri Nov 15 08:57:12 PST 1996
Article: 192554 of control
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!noc.van.hookup.net!nic.mtl.hookup.net!rcogate.rco.qc.ca!n3ott.istar!ott.istar!istar.net!winternet.com!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!howland.erols.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!nazicancel!news.mindspring.com!usenet
From: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com ("Truth")
Sender: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com ("Truth")
Approved: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com ("Truth")
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 07:29:17 GMT
Subject: cmsg cancel <565v3q$lr5@camel2.mindspring.com>
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc.
Control: cancel <565v3q$lr5@camel2.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: 
Supersedes: 
X-No-Archive: Yes
X-Cancelled-By: rbraver@ohww.norman.ok.us
X-Spam-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 02:16:55 GMT
X-Spam-Subject: What is 'Holocaust Denial'?
Lines: 29

These cancels are issued as a service to the Internet providers not wishing
to carry articles from the fascist goosestepping Nazis. Sites that do not wish
to take advantage of this free service can easily can opt out of these
cancels by "aliasing out" the nazicancel pseudosite.

Help protect our right to issue third-party cancels. Vote to stop the NCM
proposal. Please e-mail this pre-filled ballot to voting@hut.fi today:

======== BEGINNING OF BALLOT: Delete everything before this line =======
.-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| 1ST CALL FOR VOTES: news.software.misc, news.lists reorganization
| Official Usenet Voting Ballot  (Do not remove this line!)
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Please provide your real name, or your vote may be rejected.  Place
| ONLY your name (ie. do NOT include your e-mail address or any other
| information; ONLY your name) after the colon on the following line:

Voter name:

| Insert YES, NO, ABSTAIN, or CANCEL inside the brackets for each
| newsgroup listed below (do not delete the newsgroup name):

 Your Vote   Newsgroup
 ---------   -----------------------------------------------------------
[   NO    ]  news.lists.filters
[   NO    ]  news.lists.misc
[   NO    ]  news.software.misc

======== END OF BALLOT: Delete everything after this line ==============


From jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com Fri Nov 15 08:57:13 PST 1996
Article: 192556 of control
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!noc.van.hookup.net!laslo.netnet.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-5.sprintlink.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!cs.utexas.edu!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!nazicancel!news.mindspring.com!usenet
From: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com (Danka)
Sender: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com (Danka)
Approved: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com (Danka)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 00:08:28 GMT
Subject: cmsg cancel <563pcn$k84@camel2.mindspring.com>
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc.
Control: cancel <563pcn$k84@camel2.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: 
Supersedes: <01bbcebc$91b74060$897ff0c7@konza.flinthills.com>
X-No-Archive: Yes
X-Cancelled-By: sanguish@digifix.com
X-Original-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 06:26:37 GMT
X-Original-Subject: Will someone please translate this to english(thanks)
Lines: 29

These cancels are issued as a service to the Internet providers not wishing
to carry articles from the fascist goosestepping Nazis. Sites that do not wish
to take advantage of this free service can easily can opt out of these
cancels by "aliasing out" the nazicancel pseudosite.

Help protect our right to issue third-party cancels. Vote to stop the NCM
proposal. Please e-mail this pre-filled ballot to voting@hut.fi today:

======== BEGINNING OF BALLOT: Delete everything before this line =======
.-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| 1ST CALL FOR VOTES: news.software.misc, news.lists reorganization
| Official Usenet Voting Ballot  (Do not remove this line!)
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Please provide your real name, or your vote may be rejected.  Place
| ONLY your name (ie. do NOT include your e-mail address or any other
| information; ONLY your name) after the colon on the following line:

Voter name:

| Insert YES, NO, ABSTAIN, or CANCEL inside the brackets for each
| newsgroup listed below (do not delete the newsgroup name):

 Your Vote   Newsgroup
 ---------   -----------------------------------------------------------
[   NO    ]  news.lists.filters
[   NO    ]  news.lists.misc
[   NO    ]  news.software.misc

======== END OF BALLOT: Delete everything after this line ==============


From jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com Fri Nov 15 08:57:15 PST 1996
Article: 192887 of control
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!howland.erols.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!nazicancel!news.mindspring.com!usenet
From: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com ("Truth")
Sender: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com ("Truth")
Approved: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com ("Truth")
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 16:27:02 GMT
Subject: cmsg cancel <56blgo$ovr@camel2.mindspring.com>
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc.
Control: cancel <56blgo$ovr@camel2.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: 
Supersedes: 
X-No-Archive: Yes
X-Cancelled-By: hw@atlantic.FB12.TU-Berlin.DE
X-Old-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 06:08:25 GMT
X-Old-Subject: What is 'Holocaust Denial'?
Lines: 29

These cancels are issued as a service to the Internet providers not wishing
to carry articles from the fascist goosestepping Nazis. Sites that do not wish
to take advantage of this free service can easily can opt out of these
cancels by "aliasing out" the nazicancel pseudosite.

Help protect our right to issue third-party cancels. Vote to stop the NCM
proposal. Please e-mail this pre-filled ballot to voting@hut.fi today:

======== BEGINNING OF BALLOT: Delete everything before this line =======
.-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| 1ST CALL FOR VOTES: news.software.misc, news.lists reorganization
| Official Usenet Voting Ballot  (Do not remove this line!)
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Please provide your real name, or your vote may be rejected.  Place
| ONLY your name (ie. do NOT include your e-mail address or any other
| information; ONLY your name) after the colon on the following line:

Voter name:

| Insert YES, NO, ABSTAIN, or CANCEL inside the brackets for each
| newsgroup listed below (do not delete the newsgroup name):

 Your Vote   Newsgroup
 ---------   -----------------------------------------------------------
[   NO    ]  news.lists.filters
[   NO    ]  news.lists.misc
[   NO    ]  news.software.misc

======== END OF BALLOT: Delete everything after this line ==============


From jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com Sat Nov 16 06:57:46 PST 1996
Article: 79758 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!noc.van.hookup.net!nic.win.hookup.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!nic.mtl.hookup.net!rcogate.rco.qc.ca!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!portc01.blue.aol.com!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!howland.erols.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!newspump.sol.net!news.mindspring.com!usenet
From: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com ("Truth")
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Who Rules America?
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 05:42:33 GMT
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc.
Lines: 607
Message-ID: <56gsou$mu4@camel4.mindspring.com>
Reply-To: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: user-168-121-85-52.dialup.mindspring.com
X-Server-Date: 15 Nov 1996 04:49:34 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

There is no greater power in the world today than that wielded by the
manipulators of public opinion in America. No king or pope of old, no
conquering general or high priest ever disposed of a power even
remotely approaching that of the few dozen men who control America's
mass news and entertainment media. 

Their power is not distant and impersonal; it reaches into every home
in America, and  it works its will during nearly every waking hour. It

is the power which shapes and molds the mind of virtually every
citzen, young or old, rich or poor, simple or sophicticated. 

The mass media form for us our image of the world and then tell us
what to think about that image. Essentially everthing we know,or think
we know, about events outside our own neighborhood or circle of
acquaintances comes to us via our daily newspapers,our weekly news
magazine, our radio, or our television. 

It is not just the heavy-handed suppression of certain news stories
>from  our newspapers or the blatant propagandizing fo
history-distorting TV "docudramas" which charaterizes the opinion
-manipulating techniques of the media masters. They exercise both
subtlety and thoroughness in their management which they present to
us.

For example, the way in which the news is covered:which items are
emphasized and which are played down, the reporter's choice of
words,tone of voice, and facial expressions; the wording of headlines
; the choice of illustrations - all of these things subliminally and
yet profoundly affect the way in which we interpret what we see or
hear.
On top of this,of course, the columnist and editors remove remaining
doubt from our minds as to just what we are to think about it all.
Employing carefully developed psychological thechniques , they guide
our thought and opininion so that we can be in tune with the "in"
crowd, the "beautiful people", the "smart money." They let us know
exactly what our attitudes should be toward various types of people
and behavior in the context of a TV drama or situation comedy and
having the other TV characters react to them in the Politically
Correct way

For example, a racially mixed couple will be respected ,liked, and
socially sought after by other characters, as will a "take charge" 
black scholar or businessman, or a sensitive and talented homosexual,
or a poor but honest and hardworking illegal alien from Mexico. On the
other hand, a White racist - that is, any racially conscious White
person who looks in askance as miscegenation or at thr rapidly
darkening racial situation in America - is portrayed, at best, as a
despicable bigot who is reviled by the characters,or at worst, as a
dangerous psychopath who is fascinated by firearms and is a menace to
all law -abidiing citizens. The white racist "gun nut" in fact, has
become a familiar stereotype of TV shows. 

The average American , of whose daily life TV- watching takes such an
unhealty portion, distinguishes between these fictional situations and
reality only with dificulty, if at all. He responds to the telivised
actions ,statements and, attitudes of TV actors much as he does to his
own peers in real life. For all too many Americans the real world has
been replaced by the false reality that his urge to conform responds.
Thus, when a TV scriptwriter expresses approval fo some ideas and
actions through the TV characters for whom he writing, and disapproval

of others, he exerts a powerful pressure on millions of viewers toward
conformity with his own views.

And as it is with TV entetainment, so it is also with the news,
whether televised or printed. The insidious thing about this form of
thought control is that even when we realize that entertainment or
news is biased, the media masters still are able to manipulate most of
us. This is because they not only slant what they present, but they
establish tacit boundaries and ground rules for the permissable
spectrum of opinion. 

As an example, consider the media treatment of Middle East news. Some
editors or commentators are slavishly  pro-Israel in their every
utterance, while others seem neutral. No one, however, dares suggest
that the United States is on the wrong side in the Arab-Jewish
conflict and that it served Jewish interests rather than American
interests  to send US forces to cripple Iraq, Israel'  principal rival
in the Middle East.  Thus, a spectrum of permissible opinion, from a
pro-Israel to nearly neutral , is established. 
 
Another example is the media treatment of racial issues  in the United
States . Some  commentators seem almost dispassionate in reporting
news of racial strife, while others are emotionally partisan - with
partisanship always on the non-white side. All of the media spokesmen
without exception , however, take the position that 'multcultralism'
and racial mixing are here to stay, and that they are good things

Because there are differences in degree,however, most Americans fail
to realize that they are being manipulated. Even the citizen who
complains about "managed news" and "biased media" falls into the trap
of thinking that because he presented with an apparent spectrum of
opinion he can escape the thought controllers' influence by believing
the editor or commetator of his choice(hence Jewish playpen) It's a 
"heads I win, tails you lose"  situation. Every point on the
permissible spectrum of public opinion is acceptable to the media
masters - and no impermissable fact or viewpoint is allowed any
exposure at all, if they can prevent it. 

The control of the opinion -molding media is nearly monolithic. All of
the controlled media - television , radio , newspapers, magazines,
books, motion pictures - speak with a single voice , each reinforcing
the other. Despite the appearance of variety, there is no real
dissent, no alternative source of facts or ideas accessible to the
great mass of people which might allow them to form opinions at odds
with those of the media masters. They are presented with a single view
of the world - a world in which every voice proclaims the equality of
races, the inerrant nature of the Jewish "Holocaust" tale, the
wickedness of attempting to halt a flood of non-White aliens from
pouring across our borders, the danger of permitting citizens to keep
and bear arms, the moral equivalances of all sexual orientations, and
the desirability of a "pluralistic", cosmospolitan society rather than
a homogenous one. It is the view of the world designed by the media
masters to suit their own ends - and the pressure to conform to that
view is overwhelming. People adapt their opinions to it,  vote in
accord with it, and shape their lives to fit it. 

And who are these all-powerful masters of the media? As we shall see,
to a very large extent they are Jews.

Electronic New and Entertainment Media

Continuing government deregulation of the telecommunicatons  industry
has resulted, not in touted increased competition , but rather in an
accelerating wave of caroporate mergers and acquistions that have
produced a handful of multi-billion-dollar media congomerates.
Whenever you watch television , wheter from a local broadcating
station or a via cable or satelite dish; whenever you see a featrue
film in a theater or at home; whenever you listen to the radio or
recorded music; whenever you read a newspaper, book, or magazine - it
is very likely that the information or entertainment you receive was
produced and/ or distributed by one of these megamedia companies.

The largest media conglomerate today is Walt Disney Company, whoese
chairman and CEO, Michael Eisner, is a Jew. The Disney empire, headed
by a man described by one media anlyst as "a control freak", includes
several television production companies( Walt Disney Television,
Touchstone Television, Buean Vista Television), it own cable network
with 14 million subsribers, and two video prodution companies. 

As for feature films, the Walt Disney Picture Group, headed by Joe
Roth(also a Jew), includes Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures,
and Caravan pictures. Disney also owns Miramax Films, run by the
Weinstein brothers, who have produced such ultra-raunchy movies as the
"Crying Game", "Priests" and "Kids."

When the Disney Company was run by the Gentile Disney family prior to
its takeover by Eisner in 1984, it epitomized wholesome, family
entertainment. While it still holds the rights to "Snow White", under
Eisner the company has expanded into the production of graphic  sex
and gratutious violence. In addition to TV and movies, the corporation
owns Disneyland, Disney World, Epcot Center, Tokyo Disneyland, and
Euro Disney. 

Disney also sell annually well over a billion dollars worth of
consumer products:books,toys and clothing. In August 1995 Eisner
acquired Capital Cities/ABC, Inc, to create a media empire with annual
sales of $16.5 billion. Capital Cities/ABC owns the ABC Television
Network, which in turn owns ten TV stations outright in such big
markets as New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, and Houston.
In addition, it has 225 affiliated stations in the United States and
is part owner of several European TV comapnies.

ABC's cable subsidiary, ESPN, is headed by president and CEO Steven
Bornstein, who is a Jew. The coporation also has a controlling share
of Lifetime Television and the Arts & Entertainment  Network cable
companies. ABC Radio Network owns 11 AM and ten FM stations, again in
major cities such as New York, Washington, and Los Angeles and has
over 3,400 affiliates.

Although primarily a telecommunications company. Capital Cities/ABC
earned over $1 billion in publishing in 1994. It owns seven daily
newspapers, Fairchild Publications(Women's Wear Daily), Chilton
Publications(automotive manuels), and the Diversified Publishing
Group. 
Time Warner,Inc, is the second of the international media leviathans.
The chairman of the board and CEO, Gerald M. Levin, is a Jew. Time
Warner's subsidiary HBO is country's largest pay-TV cable network. 
Warner Music is by far the world's largest record company, with 50
labels, the biggest of which is Warner Brothers Records, headed by
Danny Goldberg. Stuart Hersch is president of Warnervision, Warner
Music's video production unit. Goldberg and Hersch are both Jews. 

Warner Music was an early promoter of "gangsta rap"." Through its
involvement with Interscope Records it helped popularize a genre whose
graphic lyrics explicitly urge Blacks to commit acts of violence
against whites. 
In addition to cable and music, Time Warner is heavily involved in the
production of feature films(Warner Brothers Studio) and publishing.
Time Warner's publishing division(editor-in-chief Norman Pearlstine, a
Jew) is the largest magazine publisher in the country(Time, Sports
Illustrated, People, Fortune) 

Levin maybe the number one magnate if the planned deal with Turner
Broadcating System is completed.(Merger finalized as of 1996). 
When Ted Turner, the Gentile media maverick, made a bid to buy CBS in
1985, there was panic in media boardrooms across the nation. Turner
had made a fortune in advertising and the had built a successful
cable-TV news network, CNN. Although Turner employed a number of Jews
in key excutive positions in CNN and had never taken public positions
contrary to Jewish interests, he is man with a large ego and  strong
personality and was regarded by Chairman William Paley and other Jews
at CBS as uncontrollable: a loose cannon who might at some time in the
future turn against them. Furthermore, Jewish newsmam Daniel Schorr,
who had worked for Turner, publicly charged that his former boss held
a personal dislike for Jews. 
To block Turner's bid CBS executives invited billionaire Jewish
theater, hotel,insurance and cigarette magnate Laurence Tisch to
launch a "friendly" takeover of the company, and from 1986 til 1995
Tisch was chairman and CEO of CBS, removing any threat of non-Jewish
influence there. Subsequent efforts by Turner to acquire a major
network have been obstructed by Levin's Time Warner, which owns nearly
20 percent of CBS stock and has veto power over major deals. 
Thus, despite being being an innovator and garnering headlines, Turner
has nerver commanded the wealth and power to be a true media master. 
Turner may have decided: "if you can't lick 'em join 'em" If TBS
merges with Time Warner, Levin will become Turner's boss, and CNN, the
only rival to the network news, will come under complete Jewish
control.(deal finalized) 
Viacom, Inc, headed by Sumner Redstone(born Murray Rothstein), is the
third largest megamedia corporation in corporation in the country,
with revenues of over $10 billion a year. Viacom, which produces and
distributes TV programs for the three largest networks, own 12
television stations and 12 radio stations. It produces feature films
through Paramount Pictures, headed by Jewess Sherry Lansing
Its publishing division includes Prentice Hall, Simon & Schuster,and
Pocket Books. It distributes videos through over 4, 000 blockbuster
stores. It is also involved in satellite broadcasting, theme parks,
and video games. 
Viacom's chief claim to fame, however, is as the world's largest
provider of cable programming, thorough its showtime, MTV,
Nickelodeon, and other networks. Since 1989 MTV and Nickelodeon have
acquired larger and larger shares of the juvenile television audience.
Redstone, who actually owns 76 per cent of the shares of Viacom($3
billiion), offers Beavis and Butthead as teen role models and is the
largest single purveyor of race-mixing propaganda to White teenagers
and sub-teens in America and Europe. MTV pumps its racially mixed rock
and rap videos into 210 million homes in 71 countries and is the
dominant culural influence on teenagers around the world. 
Nickelodean has by far the largest share of the four-to-11-year-old TV
audience in America and also is expandind rapidly into Europe. Most of
its shows do not yet display the blatant degeneracy which is MTV's
trademark, but Redstone is gradually nudging the fare presented to his
kiddie viewers toward the same poison purveyed by MTV.
With the top three, and by far the largest, media conglomerates in the
hands of Jews, it is difficult to believe that such an overwhelming
degree of control came about without a deliberate, concerted effort on
their part. 
What about the other big media companies? 
Number four on the list is Rupert Murdoch's News corporation, which
owns FOX Television Network and 20th Century Fox Films. Murdoch is a
gentile , but Peter Chernin, who heads Murdoch's film studio and also
oversees his TV production, is a Jew. 
Number five is the Japanese Sony Corporation, whose U.S.
subsidiary , Sony Corporation of America, is run by Michael Schulhof,
a Jew. Alan J Levine, another Jew, heads the Sony Pictures division.
Most of the television and movie production companies that are not
owned by the largest corporations are also controlled by Jews. For
example, New World Entertainment,proclaimed by one media analyst as
"the premiere independent TV program producer in the United States,"
is owned by Ronald Perelman, a Jew who also owns Revelon cosmetics.
The chairman at New World, Brandon Tartikoff(formerly head of
entertainment programming at NBC), is a Jew. The best known of the
smaller media companies, Dreamworks SKG, is a strictly kosher affair.
Dream Works was formed in 1994 amid great media hype by recording
industry mogul David Geffen,former Disney Pictures chairman Jeffrey
Katzenberg, and film director Steven Spielberg , all three of whom are
Jews. The company produces movies, annimated films,television
programs, and recorded music. Considering cash and connections that
Geffen, Katzenberg and Spielberg have, Dream Works may soon be in the
same league as the big three. 
Two other large production companies, MCA and Universal Pictures, are
both by Seagram Company, Ltd. The president and CEO of Seagram, the
liquor giant, is Edgar Bronfman Jr, who is also president of the World
Jewish Congress.
It is well known that Jews have controlled production  and
distribution of films since the inception of the movie industry in the
early decades of this century. This is still the case today. 
Films produced by just the five largest motion picture companies
mentioned above - Disney, Warner Brothers, Sony,Paramount(Viacom), and
universal(Seagram) - accounted for 74 per cent of the total box-office
receipts for the year to date(August 1995).
The big three in Television network broadcasting  used to be ABC, CBS,
and NBC. With the consolidation of the media empires, these three are
no longer independent, however, each was controlled by a Jew  since
its inception:ABC by Leonard Goldenson,CBS by William Palley and then
by Laurence Tisch, and NBC first by David Sarnoff and the by his son
Robert. Over periods of several decades these networks were staffed
>from  top to bottom with Jews. , and the essential Jewishness of
network television did not change when the networks were absorbed by
other corporations. The Jewish presence in television news remains
particularly strong. 
AS note ,ABC is part of Eisner's Disney Company, and the executive
producers of ABC's news programs are all Jews. Victor S Neufeld(20-20)

Bob Reichbloom(Good Morning America), and Rick Kaplan(World News
Tonight).
CBS was recently purchased by Westinghouse Electric Corporation.
Nevertheless, the man appointed by Laurence Tisch, Eric Ober, remains
president of CBS News, and Ober is a Jew. 
At NBC, now owned by General Electric, NBC News president Andrew Lack
is a Jew, as are executive producers Jeff Zucker(Today), Jeff
Gralnick(NBC Nightly News), and Neal Shapiro(Dateline)

THE PRINT MEDIA 

After television news, daily newspapers are the most influential
information medium in America. Sixty million of them are sold(and
presumably read) each day. These millions are divided among some 1,500
different publications. One might conclude that the the sheer number
of different newspapers across America would provide a safeguard
against minority control and distortion. Alas, such is not the case.
There is less independence, less  competition, and much less
representation of majority interests than a casual observer would
think. 
The days when most cities and even towns had several independently
owned newspapers published by local people with close ties to the
community are gone. Today most "local" newspapers are owned by a
rather small number small number of large companies thousands of miles
away. The fact is that only about 25 per cent of the country's 1,5000
papers are independently  owned; the rest have circulation belong to
multi-newspaper chains. Only 100 of the total number have circulations
of more than 100,000. Only a handful are large enough to maintain
independent reporting staff's outside their own communities: the rest
must depend on these few for all their national and international
news. 
In only 50 cities in America are there more than one daily newspaper,
and competition is frequently nominal even among them, as between
morning and afternoon editions under the same ownership. Examples of
this are are the Huntsville, Alabama, morning News and afternoon
Times; the Birmingham, Alabama morning post Herald and afternoon
Herald-Journal - all owned by the  Jewish Newhouse brothers through
their holding , Advance publications. 
The Newhouse media empire provides an example of more than the lack of
real competition among America's daily newspapers: it also illustrates
the isatiable appetite Jews have shown for all organs of opinion
control on which they could fasten their grip. The Newhouses own 26
daily newspapers, including several large and important ones, such as
the Cleavland Plain Dealer, the Newark Star -Ledger , and  the New
Orleans Times-Picayunne;the nation's largest trade book publishing
conglomerate,Random House, with all its subsidiaries; Newhouse
Broadcating, consisting of 12 television broadcating stations and 87
cable-TV systems, including some of the country's largest cable
networks; the sunday supplement "Parade", with a circulation of more
than 22 million copies per week;  some two dozen major magazines,
including the New Yorker, Vogue, Mademoiselle, Glamour, Vanity Fair,
Bride's, Gentlemen's Quaterly, Self, House & Garden, and all the other
magazines of the wholly owned Conde Nast group. 
This Jewish media empire was founded by the late Sumuel Newhouse, an
immigrant from Russia. When he died in 1979 at the age of 84, he
bequethed media holdings worth an estimated $1.3 billion to his two
sons, Samuel and Donald. With a number of further acquisitions , the
net worth of Advance Publications has grown to a more than $8 billion
today. 
The gobbling up of so many newspapers by the Newhouse family was in
large degree made possible  by the fact that newspapers are not
supported by their subscribers, but by their advertisers . It is
advertising revenue - not the small change collected from newspaper's
readers - that largely pays the editor's salary and yields the owner's
profit. 
Whenever the large abvertisers in a city choose to favor one newspaper
over another with their business, the favored newspaper will flourish
while its competitor dies. Since the begenning of this century, when
Jewish mercantile power in America became a dominant economic force,
there has been a steady rise in the number of American newspapers in
Jewish hands, accompanied by a steady decline in the number of
competing Gentile newspapers - primarily as a result of selective
advertising policies of Jewish merchants. 
Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership and
management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising revenue
that their editorial and news reporting policies are largely
constrained by Jewish likes and dislikes. It holds true in the
newspaper business as elsewhere that he who pay the pipe calls the
tune. 

Three Jewish Newspapers

The suppresion of competition and the establishment of local
monopolies on the dissemination of news and opinion have characterized
the rise of Jewish control over America's newspapers. The resulting
ability of the Jews to use the press as an unopposed instrument of
Jewish policy could hardly be better illustrated than by the examples
of the nation's three most prestigious and influential newspapers: The
New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post.
These three,dominating America's financial and capitals, are the
newspapers set the trends and guidelines for nearly all the others.
They are the ones which decide what is news and what isn't, at the
national and international levels. They originate the news; the others
merely copy it. And all three newspapers are in Jewish hands. 
The New York Times is the unofficial social, fashion, enterainment,
political, and cultural guide of the nation. It tells America's "smart
set" which books to buy and which films to see; which opinions are in
style at the moment; which politicians, educators, spiritual leaders,
artists, and businessmen are the real comers. And for a few decades in
the last century it was a genuinely American newspaper. 
The New York Times was founded in 1851 by two Gentiles, Henry J
Raymond and George Jones. After their deaths, it was purchased in 1896
form Jones's estate by a wealthy Jewish publisher, Adolph Ochs. His
great-grandson, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr., is the paper's current
publisher and CEO. The executive editor is Max Frankel, and the
managing editor is Joseph Lelyveld. Both of the latter also are Jews. 
The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York Times Co.,33
other newspapers, including the Boston Globe, purchased in June of
1993 for $1.1 billion; twelve magazines, including McMcall's and
Family Circle with circulations of more than 5 million each; seven
radio stations and TV broadcasting stations; a cable-TV system; and
three book publishing companies. The New York Times News Service
transmits news stories, features, and photographs from New York Times
by wire to 506 other newspapers, news agencies, and magazines.
Of similar national importance is the Washington,which, by
establishing its "leaks" throughout government agencies in Washington,
has inside track on news involving the Federal government.
The Washington Post, like the New York Times, had a non-Jewish origin.
It was established in 1877 by Stilson Hutchins, purchased from him in
1905 by John R McClean, and later inheireted by Edward B. McLean. In
June 1933, however, at the height of the Great Depression, the
newspaper was forced into bankruptcy. It was purchased at a bankruptcy
auction by infamous Eugene Meyer, a Jewish financier and former
partner of the infamous Bernard Baruch, industry czar in American
during the First World War. 
The Washington Post is now run by Katerine Meyer Graham, Eugene
Meyer's daughter. She is the principal stockholder and the board
chairman of the Washington Post Co. In 1979 she appointed her son,
Donald, publisher of the paper. He now also holds the posts of
president and CEO of the Washington Post Co. 
The Washington Post Co. has a number of other media holdings in
newspapers, television, and magazines, most notably the nation's
number-two weekly newsmagazine, Newsweek. In a joint venture with the
New York Times, the Post publishes the International Herald Tribune,
the most widely distributed English language daily in the world. 
The Wall Street Journal, which sells 1.8 million copies each weekday,
is the nation's largest-circulation daily newspaper. It is owned by
Dow Jones & Company, Inc, a New York corporation which also publishes
24  other daily newspapers and the weeky financial tabloid Barron's,
among other things. The chairman and CEO of Dow Jones is Peter R.
Kann, who is a Jew. Kann also holds the posts of chairman and
publisher of the Wall Street Journal. 
Most of New York' other major newspapers are in no better hands than
the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. In January 1993 the
New York Daily News was bought from the estate of the late Jewish
media mogul Robert Maxwell(born Ludvik Hoch) by Jewish real-estate
developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman. The Village Voice is the property of
Leonard Stern, the billionaire Jewish owner of the Hartz Mountain pet
supply firm. 

Other Mass Media 

The story is pretty much the same for other media as it is for
televison, radio, and newspapers. Consider, for example,
newsmagazines. There are only three of any note published in the
United States; Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report. 
Time, with  a weekly ciurculation of 4.1 million, is publlished by a
subsidiary of Time Warner Communications, the new media conglomerate
formed the 1989 merger of Time, Inc, with Warner Communications. 
The CEO of Time Warner Communications, as mentioned above, is Gerald
Levin, a Jew. 
Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington Post
Company, under Jewess Katherine Meyer Graham. Its weekly circulation
is 3.2 million.
U.S. News & World Report, with a weekly circulation of 2.3 million, is
owned and published by the aforementioned Mortimer B. Zuckerman, who
also has taken the position of the editor-in-chief of the magazine for
himself. Zuckerman also owns the Atlantic Monthly and New York's
tabloid newspaper, the Daily News, which is the sixth-largest paper in
the country. 
Or consider books. There are literally thousands of publishers in the
United States, and among these thousands are many with little or no
direct Jewish control;  there are some which acutually dare to publish
books not approved by the Jewish Establishment. But all of the latter
publishers are very small, and their books seldom reach the great mass
of American who buy their reading material from drugstore news racks
or from chain store bookstores. 
Among the giant publishing conglomerates, however, the situation is
quite kosher. Three of the six largest book publishers in the United
States, according Publishers Weekly, are owned or controlled by Jews.
The three are first-place Random House(with its many subsidiaries,
including Crown Publishing Group), third-palce Simon & Schuster and
sixth place  Time Warner. Trade Group(including Warner Books and
Little, Brown) 
As pointed out above, the Newhouse family owns Random House, and
Gerald Levin is CEO of Time Warner Communications, of which Time
Warner Trade Group is a division. Simon & Schuster is subsidiary of
Viacom ,Inc, of which the chairman and CEO is Sumner Redstone, as
already noted. Another publisher of special significance is Western
Publishing. Although it ranks only 13th in size among all U.S.
publishers, it ranks first among publishers of childern's books, with
more than 50 per cent of the market. Its chairman and CEO is Richard
Snyder, a Jew, who just replaced Richard Bernstein, also a Jew. 

Our Responsibility

Those are the facts of media control in America. Anyone willing to
spend a few hours in a large library looking into current editions of
yearbooks on the radio adn television industries and directories of
newspapers and magazines; into registers of corporations and their
officers, such as those published by Standard and Poors and by Dun and
Bradstreet; and into standard biographical reference works can verify
their accuracy. They are undeniable, and when confronted with them
Jewish Spokesmen customarily will use evasive tactics. "Ted Turner
isn't a Jew!" they will announce triumphantly, as if that settled the
issue. If pressed further they will accuse the confronter of
"anti-Semitism" for even raising the subject. It is fear of this
accusation which keeps many persons silent who know the facts. 
But we must not remain silent on this most important of issues!   
The Jewish control of the American mass is the single most important
fact of life, not just in America, but in the whole world today. There
is nothing - plague,famine, economic collapse, even nuclear war - more
dangerous to the future of our people.
By permitting the Jews to control our news and entertainment media we
are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence on our
political system and virtual control of our  government; we also are
giving them control of the minds and souls of our childern, whose
attitudes and ideas are shaped more by Jewish television and Jewish
films than by parents, schools, or any other influence. 
The Jew-controlled entertainment media have taken the lead in
persuading a whole generation that homosexuality is a normal and
acceptable way of life; that there is nothing at all wrong  with a
White woman dating or marrying a black man, or with White men marrying
Asiactic women; that all races are inheirently equal in ability and
character - except that the character of the White race is suspect
because of a history of oppressing other races; and that any effort by
Whites at racial self-presevation is reprehensible.
We must oppose the spreading of this poison among our people, and we
must break the power of those who are spreading it. It would be
intolerable for such power to be in the hands of any alien minority,
with values and interests different from our own. But to permit Jews,
with their 3,000 year history of nation-wrecking, from ancient Egypt
to Russia, to hold such power over us is tantamount to suicide.
Indeed, the fact that so many White Americans today are so filled with
a sense of racial guilt and self-hatred that they actively seek the
death of their own race is a deliberate consequence of Jewish media
control. 
Once we have absorbed and understood the fact of Jewish media control,
it is our inescapable responsibility to do whatever is necessary to
break that control. We must shrink from nothing in combatting this
evil power. which has fastened its deadly grip on our people and is
injecting its lethal poison into their minds and souls. If we fail to
destroy it, it will certainly destroy us. 

Comment:
And you thought the politicians were running the show? Ha!



































































From jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com Tue Nov 19 07:20:45 PST 1996
Article: 36121 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.axionet.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!news.mindspring.com!usenet
From: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com ("Truth")
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Subject: How Jews purport the dissolution of the white race
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 07:40:54 GMT
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc.
Lines: 98
Message-ID: <56mcej$hjb@camel2.mindspring.com>
Reply-To: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: user-168-121-85-52.dialup.mindspring.com
X-Server-Date: 17 Nov 1996 06:47:47 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

RABBI ABRAHAM L. FEINBERG
says the one solution to racial conflict is interracial marriage.

For small-L Liberals-and most Canadians fall into this category - one
of the most nagging dilemmas of their creed is the gap between the
preaching and  the practice of racial equality. We support the civil
rights movement in the U.S.
This "no", this refusal to sanction the mixiing of the races, is the
final bastion of race hostility. Until we learn to fight our ingrown
fears of sexual relations between the races, the end of the race
problem will not be in sight. Only when we no longer raise our
eyebrows at the sight of a Negro holding hands with a white girl wit
the West have begun to tear the racial poison from its vitals. Such a
change will involve an inside-out remodelling of the white psyche, for
our fear of mixed marriages is deeply rooted. But the change must
begin sometime. Why not now??
One reason why not, according to those who bridle at the thought of
miscegenation, is that there is some basic, physiological
incompatibility between the races. Allied to this notion is the fear,
seldom expressed but nevertheless real, that "mogrelization" of the
races would somehow result in an inferior human product. Neither
notion stands up to close analysis.
Finnally, there is the objection (and perhaps"objection" is the wrong
word to apply to such an emotional attitude) that some races are
innately savage. According to this view - and it's surprising how many
earnest liberals half-believe it - the caos in the Congo and mob
violence in Harlem spring from a single black source. History shows,
however, that no race, regardless of its technological progress, has a
monopoly on savegery. 
By emphasizing these unhappy similarities between the races, I do not
mean to suggest that there are no differences. Of course there are.
Races do differ - in the frequency of blood-type distribution, in
taste  sensitivivity, in hairiness and perhaps in body smell(to cite
only a few areas where variations have been scientifically verified).
Furthermore, there are racial differences which at first glance seem
to support the segregationist view that some races are inferior. 
On intelligence involving symbolic analysis ,Negroes and Indians are
said to perform less well than Whites. And during the Second World
war, the percentage of negroes rejected by the draft on mental grounds
was six time the white percentage. These are real disabilities, and
leaders of the U.S. civil rights movement must recognize them and try
to overcome them. But Black disabilities have their roots in
generations of systematic, ghettoized, all-pervasive rejection and
repression by the whites.
Certainly, the mixed couple contemplating marriage a whole sea of
troubles that couples of the same race never encounter. So do their
childern. But their is some evidence to suggest that the barriers
imposed by society are beginning to crumble. In New York, interracial
marriages appear to be on the increase, although precise staticitics
are difficult to obtain because applicants for marriage licenses are
not required to state their racial origin. If anything, the law should

ecourage, not forbid, the intermingling of "bloods". Then the prestige

of the state would buttress a basic scientific would buttress a basic
scientific fact - and anthropology professors who now whisper their
defense of interracial would shout it from the housetops.
ONE WORLD,ONE RACE

But legislation cannot change the human heart. The only way we can
accomplish that, the only way we can achieve a Final Solution to
racial prejudice, is to create a melange of races so universal that no
one can preen himself on his racial "purity" or practise the barbarism
to safeguard it.
The deliber encouragement of interracial marriages is the only way to
hasten this process. And it may be that time is growing short. The
dominance of our world has begun to shift like cargo in listing
vessel, from the white races to the colored. The sooner we adjust to
this fact, the better it will be for our childern. For we might well
acknowledge, even the most enlightnened of us, that we will never
completely eliminate racial prejudice until we eliminate seperate
races.

Question:
Why  can't Arabs and Jewish settlers peacefully coexsist in Hebron as
whites and blacks are supposed to in the United States?

Why is an Arab marrying an Orthodox Jew shunned by Orthodox rabbis?

Why were Falasha Jews(black Jews) prohibited from donating blood in
Israel? Were they not kosher enough or was it because of their skin
color?

Why is racial mixing good for everyone else but the Jew?

Why is there not equal representation of Arabs on the Israeli
Kinneset?

Why is  there ethnic/racial partion of Arabs and Jews in the Jewish
State of Israel.

Why is it legal for Jewish settlers to tote Uzi sub machineguns in
areas mostly occupied by Palestinians? Why can't whites legally tote
this type of weapon in some parts of the United States, particularly
areas where there are heavy concentration of Jews?





From jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com Tue Nov 19 07:40:50 PST 1996
Article: 49537 of alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!peerfeed.internetmci.com!howland.erols.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.mindspring.com!usenet
From: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com ("Truth")
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Subject: What did Benjamin Franklin say about Jews?
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 07:42:38 GMT
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc.
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <56mchq$hjb@camel2.mindspring.com>
Reply-To: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: user-168-121-85-52.dialup.mindspring.com
X-Server-Date: 17 Nov 1996 06:49:30 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

South Carolina's Charles Cotesworth Pinckney was present
at the Continental Cogress meeting in 1787 in Phiadelphia where
the U.S. constitution was being written by the delegates. 
Pinkney kept a diary called "Chit Chat Around the Table During
Intermissions." Here is the quote from Pickney's famous diary.

"I fully agree with General Washington, that we must protect this
young nation from an isidious influence and penetration. That menace,
gentlemen, is the Jews.

In whatever country Jews have settled in any great number, they have
lowered its moral tone; depreciated its commercial integrity;
have segregated themselves and have not been assimilated; have sneered
at and tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that
nation is founded, by objecting to its restrictions; have built up a
state within the state; and when opposed have tried to strangle that
country to death financially, in the case of Spain and Portugal?

For over 1,700 years, the Jews have been bewailing their sad fate
in that they have been exiled from their homeland, as they call
Palestine. But, gentlemen, did the world give it to them in fee
simple,they would at once find some reason for not returning.
Why? Because they are Vampires, and vampires do not live on vampires. 
They cannot live only among themselves. They must subsist on
Christians and other people not of their race. 

If you do not exclude them from the United States, in this
Constitution, in less than 200 years they will have swarmed here in
such great numbers that they will dominate and devour the land and
change our form of government, for which we Americans have shed blood,
given our lives, our substance and jeopardized our liberty.
If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our descendants
will be working in the fields to furnish them substance, while they
will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you,
gentlemen, if you do not exclude Jews for all time, your childern will
curse you in your graves.

Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they will or how
many generations they  are away from Asia, they will never be
otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American's and will not
evern though they will live among us ten generations. A leopard cannot
change its spots. Jews are Asiatics, are a menace to this country if
permitted entrance, and should be excluded by this Constitutional
Covention."

Comment: Benjamin Franklin was one of the founding fathers of the
United States and  a noble statesmen. 
Is his statement about Jews no less true today?
Why would someone consider Ben Franklin to be an "anti-semite" if it
were not true?



From jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com Tue Nov 19 07:41:00 PST 1996
Article: 49653 of alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.axionet.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!news.mindspring.com!usenet
From: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com ("Truth")
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Subject: How Jews purport the dissolution of the white race
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 07:41:34 GMT
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc.
Lines: 98
Message-ID: <56mcfs$hjb@camel2.mindspring.com>
Reply-To: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: user-168-121-85-52.dialup.mindspring.com
X-Server-Date: 17 Nov 1996 06:48:28 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

RABBI ABRAHAM L. FEINBERG
says the one solution to racial conflict is interracial marriage.

For small-L Liberals-and most Canadians fall into this category - one
of the most nagging dilemmas of their creed is the gap between the
preaching and  the practice of racial equality. We support the civil
rights movement in the U.S.
This "no", this refusal to sanction the mixiing of the races, is the
final bastion of race hostility. Until we learn to fight our ingrown
fears of sexual relations between the races, the end of the race
problem will not be in sight. Only when we no longer raise our
eyebrows at the sight of a Negro holding hands with a white girl wit
the West have begun to tear the racial poison from its vitals. Such a
change will involve an inside-out remodelling of the white psyche, for
our fear of mixed marriages is deeply rooted. But the change must
begin sometime. Why not now??
One reason why not, according to those who bridle at the thought of
miscegenation, is that there is some basic, physiological
incompatibility between the races. Allied to this notion is the fear,
seldom expressed but nevertheless real, that "mogrelization" of the
races would somehow result in an inferior human product. Neither
notion stands up to close analysis.
Finnally, there is the objection (and perhaps"objection" is the wrong
word to apply to such an emotional attitude) that some races are
innately savage. According to this view - and it's surprising how many
earnest liberals half-believe it - the caos in the Congo and mob
violence in Harlem spring from a single black source. History shows,
however, that no race, regardless of its technological progress, has a
monopoly on savegery. 
By emphasizing these unhappy similarities between the races, I do not
mean to suggest that there are no differences. Of course there are.
Races do differ - in the frequency of blood-type distribution, in
taste  sensitivivity, in hairiness and perhaps in body smell(to cite
only a few areas where variations have been scientifically verified).
Furthermore, there are racial differences which at first glance seem
to support the segregationist view that some races are inferior. 
On intelligence involving symbolic analysis ,Negroes and Indians are
said to perform less well than Whites. And during the Second World
war, the percentage of negroes rejected by the draft on mental grounds
was six time the white percentage. These are real disabilities, and
leaders of the U.S. civil rights movement must recognize them and try
to overcome them. But Black disabilities have their roots in
generations of systematic, ghettoized, all-pervasive rejection and
repression by the whites.
Certainly, the mixed couple contemplating marriage a whole sea of
troubles that couples of the same race never encounter. So do their
childern. But their is some evidence to suggest that the barriers
imposed by society are beginning to crumble. In New York, interracial
marriages appear to be on the increase, although precise staticitics
are difficult to obtain because applicants for marriage licenses are
not required to state their racial origin. If anything, the law should

ecourage, not forbid, the intermingling of "bloods". Then the prestige

of the state would buttress a basic scientific would buttress a basic
scientific fact - and anthropology professors who now whisper their
defense of interracial would shout it from the housetops.
ONE WORLD,ONE RACE

But legislation cannot change the human heart. The only way we can
accomplish that, the only way we can achieve a Final Solution to
racial prejudice, is to create a melange of races so universal that no
one can preen himself on his racial "purity" or practise the barbarism
to safeguard it.
The deliber encouragement of interracial marriages is the only way to
hasten this process. And it may be that time is growing short. The
dominance of our world has begun to shift like cargo in listing
vessel, from the white races to the colored. The sooner we adjust to
this fact, the better it will be for our childern. For we might well
acknowledge, even the most enlightnened of us, that we will never
completely eliminate racial prejudice until we eliminate seperate
races.

Question:
Why  can't Arabs and Jewish settlers peacefully coexsist in Hebron as
whites and blacks are supposed to in the United States?

Why is an Arab marrying an Orthodox Jew shunned by Orthodox rabbis?

Why were Falasha Jews(black Jews) prohibited from donating blood in
Israel? Were they not kosher enough or was it because of their skin
color?

Why is racial mixing good for everyone else but the Jew?

Why is there not equal representation of Arabs on the Israeli
Kinneset?

Why is  there ethnic/racial partion of Arabs and Jews in the Jewish
State of Israel.

Why is it legal for Jewish settlers to tote Uzi sub machineguns in
areas mostly occupied by Palestinians? Why can't whites legally tote
this type of weapon in some parts of the United States, particularly
areas where there are heavy concentration of Jews?





From jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com Wed Nov 20 07:39:21 PST 1996
Article: 90563 of soc.culture.german
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.axionet.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!news.mindspring.com!usenet
From: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com ("Truth")
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german
Subject: How Jews purport the dissolution of the white race
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 07:43:33 GMT
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc.
Lines: 98
Message-ID: <56mcji$hjb@camel2.mindspring.com>
Reply-To: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: user-168-121-85-52.dialup.mindspring.com
X-Server-Date: 17 Nov 1996 06:50:26 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

RABBI ABRAHAM L. FEINBERG
says the one solution to racial conflict is interracial marriage.

For small-L Liberals-and most Canadians fall into this category - one
of the most nagging dilemmas of their creed is the gap between the
preaching and  the practice of racial equality. We support the civil
rights movement in the U.S.
This "no", this refusal to sanction the mixiing of the races, is the
final bastion of race hostility. Until we learn to fight our ingrown
fears of sexual relations between the races, the end of the race
problem will not be in sight. Only when we no longer raise our
eyebrows at the sight of a Negro holding hands with a white girl wit
the West have begun to tear the racial poison from its vitals. Such a
change will involve an inside-out remodelling of the white psyche, for
our fear of mixed marriages is deeply rooted. But the change must
begin sometime. Why not now??
One reason why not, according to those who bridle at the thought of
miscegenation, is that there is some basic, physiological
incompatibility between the races. Allied to this notion is the fear,
seldom expressed but nevertheless real, that "mogrelization" of the
races would somehow result in an inferior human product. Neither
notion stands up to close analysis.
Finnally, there is the objection (and perhaps"objection" is the wrong
word to apply to such an emotional attitude) that some races are
innately savage. According to this view - and it's surprising how many
earnest liberals half-believe it - the caos in the Congo and mob
violence in Harlem spring from a single black source. History shows,
however, that no race, regardless of its technological progress, has a
monopoly on savegery. 
By emphasizing these unhappy similarities between the races, I do not
mean to suggest that there are no differences. Of course there are.
Races do differ - in the frequency of blood-type distribution, in
taste  sensitivivity, in hairiness and perhaps in body smell(to cite
only a few areas where variations have been scientifically verified).
Furthermore, there are racial differences which at first glance seem
to support the segregationist view that some races are inferior. 
On intelligence involving symbolic analysis ,Negroes and Indians are
said to perform less well than Whites. And during the Second World
war, the percentage of negroes rejected by the draft on mental grounds
was six time the white percentage. These are real disabilities, and
leaders of the U.S. civil rights movement must recognize them and try
to overcome them. But Black disabilities have their roots in
generations of systematic, ghettoized, all-pervasive rejection and
repression by the whites.
Certainly, the mixed couple contemplating marriage a whole sea of
troubles that couples of the same race never encounter. So do their
childern. But their is some evidence to suggest that the barriers
imposed by society are beginning to crumble. In New York, interracial
marriages appear to be on the increase, although precise staticitics
are difficult to obtain because applicants for marriage licenses are
not required to state their racial origin. If anything, the law should

ecourage, not forbid, the intermingling of "bloods". Then the prestige

of the state would buttress a basic scientific would buttress a basic
scientific fact - and anthropology professors who now whisper their
defense of interracial would shout it from the housetops.
ONE WORLD,ONE RACE

But legislation cannot change the human heart. The only way we can
accomplish that, the only way we can achieve a Final Solution to
racial prejudice, is to create a melange of races so universal that no
one can preen himself on his racial "purity" or practise the barbarism
to safeguard it.
The deliber encouragement of interracial marriages is the only way to
hasten this process. And it may be that time is growing short. The
dominance of our world has begun to shift like cargo in listing
vessel, from the white races to the colored. The sooner we adjust to
this fact, the better it will be for our childern. For we might well
acknowledge, even the most enlightnened of us, that we will never
completely eliminate racial prejudice until we eliminate seperate
races.

Question:
Why  can't Arabs and Jewish settlers peacefully coexsist in Hebron as
whites and blacks are supposed to in the United States?

Why is an Arab marrying an Orthodox Jew shunned by Orthodox rabbis?

Why were Falasha Jews(black Jews) prohibited from donating blood in
Israel? Were they not kosher enough or was it because of their skin
color?

Why is racial mixing good for everyone else but the Jew?

Why is there not equal representation of Arabs on the Israeli
Kinneset?

Why is  there ethnic/racial partion of Arabs and Jews in the Jewish
State of Israel.

Why is it legal for Jewish settlers to tote Uzi sub machineguns in
areas mostly occupied by Palestinians? Why can't whites legally tote
this type of weapon in some parts of the United States, particularly
areas where there are heavy concentration of Jews?





From jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com Wed Nov 20 07:39:22 PST 1996
Article: 90564 of soc.culture.german
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.axionet.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!news.mindspring.com!usenet
From: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com ("Truth")
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german
Subject: What did Benjamin Franklin say about Jews?
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 07:44:57 GMT
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc.
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <56mcm4$lr6@camel0.mindspring.com>
Reply-To: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: user-168-121-85-52.dialup.mindspring.com
X-Server-Date: 17 Nov 1996 06:51:48 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

South Carolina's Charles Cotesworth Pinckney was present
at the Continental Cogress meeting in 1787 in Phiadelphia where
the U.S. constitution was being written by the delegates. 
Pinkney kept a diary called "Chit Chat Around the Table During
Intermissions." Here is the quote from Pickney's famous diary.

"I fully agree with General Washington, that we must protect this
young nation from an isidious influence and penetration. That menace,
gentlemen, is the Jews.

In whatever country Jews have settled in any great number, they have
lowered its moral tone; depreciated its commercial integrity;
have segregated themselves and have not been assimilated; have sneered
at and tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that
nation is founded, by objecting to its restrictions; have built up a
state within the state; and when opposed have tried to strangle that
country to death financially, in the case of Spain and Portugal?

For over 1,700 years, the Jews have been bewailing their sad fate
in that they have been exiled from their homeland, as they call
Palestine. But, gentlemen, did the world give it to them in fee
simple,they would at once find some reason for not returning.
Why? Because they are Vampires, and vampires do not live on vampires. 
They cannot live only among themselves. They must subsist on
Christians and other people not of their race. 

If you do not exclude them from the United States, in this
Constitution, in less than 200 years they will have swarmed here in
such great numbers that they will dominate and devour the land and
change our form of government, for which we Americans have shed blood,
given our lives, our substance and jeopardized our liberty.
If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our descendants
will be working in the fields to furnish them substance, while they
will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you,
gentlemen, if you do not exclude Jews for all time, your childern will
curse you in your graves.

Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they will or how
many generations they  are away from Asia, they will never be
otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American's and will not
evern though they will live among us ten generations. A leopard cannot
change its spots. Jews are Asiatics, are a menace to this country if
permitted entrance, and should be excluded by this Constitutional
Covention."

Comment: Benjamin Franklin was one of the founding fathers of the
United States and  a noble statesmen. 
Is his statement about Jews no less true today?
Why would someone consider Ben Franklin to be an "anti-semite" if it
were not true?



From jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com Wed Nov 20 07:39:23 PST 1996
Article: 90586 of soc.culture.german
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!aurora.cs.athabascau.ca!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!torn!nott!bcarh189.bnr.ca!nrchh45.rich.nt.com!ferret.ocunix.on.ca!resurrect
From: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com ("Truth")
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german
Subject: What is 'Holocaust Denial'?
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 06:08:25 GMT
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc.
Lines: 255
Message-ID: 
Reply-To: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: user-168-121-85-52.dialup.mindspring.com
X-Server-Date: 13 Nov 1996 05:15:04 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
X-Resurrected-By: dave@ferret.ocunix.on.ca

Reposting article removed by rogue canceller.  See news.admin.net-abuse.announce
for further information.

In recent years, more and more attention has been devoted to the
supposed danger of "Holocaust denial." Politicians, newspapers and
television warn about the growing influence of those who reject
the Holocaust story that some six million European Jews were
systematically exterminated during the Second World War, most of 
them in gas chambers.

In Several countries, including Isreal, France, Germany and Austria,
"Holocaust denial" is against the law, and "deniers" have been
punished with stiff fines and prison sentences. Some frantic Jewish
community leaders are calling for similar government measures in North
America against defiant "revisionist." In Canada,David Matas, Senior
Counsel for the "League for Human Rights" fo the Zionist B'nai B'rith
organization, says:
    
        The Holocaust was the murder of six million Jews, including  
         two million childern. Holocaust denial is a second murder of
         those same six million. First their lives were extinguished;
         then their deaths. A person who denies the Holocaust becomes
         part of the crime of the Holocaust itself.

Often overlooked in this controversy is the crucial question: Just
what contitutes "Holocaust denial"?

Six Million?

Should someone be considered a "Holocaust denier" because he does not
believe, as Matas and others insist, that six million Jews were
killed during World War II? This figure was cited by the International
Military Tribunal at Nuremberg in 1945 and 1946. It found that "the
policy pursued(by the German government) resulted in the killing of
six million Jews, of which four million were killed in the
extermination institutions."

Yet if that is so, then several of the most prominent Holocaust
historians could be regarded as "deniers." Professor Raul Hilberg,
author of the standard reference work,"The Destruction of the European
Jews",does not accept that six million Jews died. He puts the total
of deaths(by all causes) at 5.1 million. Gerald  Reitlinger, author of
the "The Final Solution", likewise did not accept the six million
figure. He estimated the figure of Jewish wartime dead might be as
high as 4.6 million, but admitted that this was conjectural due to a
lack of reliable information. 

Human Soap?

Is someone a "Holocaust denier" if he says that the Nazis didn't use
the body fat from from the corpses of "Holocaust victims" to make 
soap? After weighing all the evidence(including an actual bar of soap
supplied  by the Soviets), the Nuremberg Tribunal declared in its
judgement  that "in some instances attempts were made to utilize the
fat from the bodies of the victims in the commercial manufacture of
soap."  In 1990, though, Israel's official "Yad Vashem" Holocaust
memorial agency "rewrote history" by admitting that the soap was not 
made from human fat story was not true. "Historians have concluded
that soap was not made from human fat. When so many people deny the 
Holocaust ever happened, why give them something to use against the 
truth?", said Yad Vashem official Shmuel Krakowski. 

Wannsee Conference?

Is someone a "holocaust denier" if he does not accept  that the
January 1942  "Wannsee conference" of German bureaucrats was held to
set or coordinate a program of sytematic mass murder of Europe's Jews?
If so, Israeli Holocaust historian Yehuda Bauer must be wrong - and a
"Holocaut denier"  - because he recently declared: "The public still
repeats, time after time, the silly story that at Wannsee the
extermination of the Jews was arrived at." In Bauer's opinion, Wannsee
was a meeting but "hardly a conference" and "little of what was said
there was executed in detail."

Extermination Policy?

Is someone a "Holocaust denier" if he says that there was no order by
Adolf Hitler to exterminate Europe's Jews? There was a time when the
answer would have been yes. Hololcaust historian Raul Hilberg, for
example, wrote in the 1961 edition of his study,"The Destruction of
the European Jews",that there were two orders decreed by Adolf Hitler
for the destruction of Europe's Jews: the first given in the spring of
1941, and the second shortly thereafter. But Hilberg removed mention
of any such order from the revised, three-volume edition of his book
published in 1985. As Holocaust historian Christopher Browning has 
noted:

    In the edition, all references in the text to a Hitler decision or

    Hitler order for the "Final Solution" have been systematically  
    excised. Buried at the bottom of a single footnote stands the 
    solitary reference: "Chronology and circumstances point to a 
    Hitler decision before the summer ended." In the new edition,
    decisions were not made and orders were not given. 

A lack of hard evidence for an extermination order by Hitler has
contributed to a controversy that divides Holocaust historians into
"intentionallists" and  "functionalists."  The former contends that
there was a premeditated extermination policy ordered by Hitler, while
the latter holds that Germany's wartime "final solution" Jewish policy
evolved at lower levels in response to circumstances. But the crucial
point here is this: notwithstanding the capture of literally tons of
German documents after the war, no one can point to documentary
evidence of a wartime extermination order,plan or program. This was 
admitted by professor Hilberg during his testimony in the 1985 trial
in Toronto of German-Canadian publisher Ernst Zundel.

Aushwitz
 
So just what constitutes "Holocaust denial"?
Surely a claim that most Auschwitz inmates died from disease and not
systematic extermination in gas chambers would be "denial." But
perhaps not. Jewish historian Arno J. Mayer, a Princeton University
professor, wrote in his 1988 study, "Why Did the Heavens Not Darken?":
The "Final Solution" in History: "..From 1942 to 1945, certainly at
Auschwitz, but probably overall,more Jews were killed by so called
'natural' causes than by 'unnatural' ones."

Even estimates of the number of people who died at Auschwitz,
allegedly the main extermination center, are no longer clear cut. 
At the postwar Nuremberg Tribunal, the Allies charged that the Germans
exterminated four million people at Auschwitz. Until 1990, a memorial
plaque at Aushwitz read: "Four Million People suffered and Died Here
at the hands of the Nazi murderers between the years 1940 and 1945."
During a 1979  visist to the camp, Pope John Paul II stood before this
memorial and blessed the four million victims.

Is it "Holocaust denial" to dispute these four million deaths? Not
today. In July 1990, the Polish government's Auschwitz State Museum,
along with Israel's Yad Vashem Holocaust center, conceded that the 
four million was a gross exageration, and references to it were
accordingly removed from the Auschwitz monument. Israeli and Polish
officials announced a tentative revised  toll of 1.1 million Aushwitz
dead. In 1993 , French Holocaust researcher Jean-Claude Pressac, in a
much discussed book about Aushcwitz, estimated that altogether about
775,000 died there during the War years.

Professor Mayer acknowledges that the question of how many really died
in Auschwitz remains open. In "Why the Heavens Not Darken?" he
wrote(p.366):

    ... Many questions remain open ... All in all, how many bodies 
         were cremated in Aushwitz? How many died there all told?
         What was the national ,religious, and ethnic breakdown in 
         this commonwealth of victims? How many of them were condemned

         to die a 'natural' death and how many were deliberately 
         slaughtered? And what was the proportion of Jews among
         those murdered in cold blood among these gassed? We have 
         simply no answers to these questions at this time.       

Gas Chambers 

What about denying the existence of extermination "gas chambers"?
Here too, Mayer makes a startling statement (on page 362 of his book):
"Sources for the study of the gas chambers are at once rare and
unreliable." While Mayer believes that such chambers did exist at 
Auschwitz, he points out that most of what is known is based on the
depositions of Nazi officials and executioners at postwar trials and
on the memory of survivors and bystanders. This testimony must be
screened carefully, since it can be influenced by subjective factors
of great complexity. 

Hoss Testimony 

One example of this might be the testimony of Rudolf Hoss , an SS
officer who served as commandant of Auschwitz. In its Judgement, the 
Nuremberg Internatinal Military Tribunal quoted at length from his
testimony to support its findings of extermination. 

It is now well established that Hoss' crucial testimony, as well as
his so-called  "confession" (which was also cited by the Nuremberg
Tribunal), are not only false, but were obtained by beating the former

commandant nearly to death. Hoss wife and childern were also
threatened with death and deportation to Siberia. In his statement,
which would not be admissible today in any United States court of law,

Hoss claimed that the exterminations were already underway at a camp
called "Wolzek" at the time he was ordered to establish extermination
facilities at Auschwitz. In fact, no such camp camp ever existed. He
further claimed that during the the time that he was commandant of 
Aushwitz, two and half million people were exterminated there, and
that a further half million died of disease.
Today reputable historian upholds these figures. Hoss was obviously
willing to say anything,sign anything and do anything to stop the
torture, and to try save himself and his family.

Forensic Investigations

In his 1988 book,Professor Mayer calls for "excavations at the killing
sites and in their immediate evirons" to determine more about the gas
chambers. In fact, such forensic studies have been made. The first was
conducted in 1988 by American execution equipment consultant, Fred A.
Leuchter, Jr. He carried out an on-site forensic examination fo
alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek to determine
if they could have been used to kill people as claimed. After a
careful study of the alleged killing facilities, Leucter concluded
that the sites were not used, and could not have been used, as
homicidal gas chambers. Furthermore, an analysis of samples taken by
Leuchter from the wall and floors of the alleged gas chambers showed
either no or miniscule traces of cyanide compound, from the active
ingredient of Zyklon B, the pesticide allegedly used to murder Jews at

Auschwitz. 

A confidential forensic examination (and subsequent report)
commissioned by the Auschwitz State Museum and conducted by Institute 
of Forensic Research in Krakow  has confirmed Leuchter's finding that
minimal or no traces of cyanide compound can be found in the sites
alleged to have been gas chambers. 

The significance of this is evident when the results of the forensic
examination of the alleged homicidal gas chambers are compared with
the results of the examination of the Auschwitz disinfestation
facilitites, where Zyklon B was used to delouse mattresses and
clothing. Whereas no or only trace amounts of cyanide were found in
the alleged homicidal gas chambers, massive traces of cyanide were
found in the walls and floor in the camp's disinfestation delousing
chambers. 

German chemist Germar Rudolf carried out a forensic study of his own.
On the basis of his on-site examination and analysis of samples, the
certified chemist and doctoral candidate concluded: "For chemical
-technical reasons, the claimed mass gassings with hydrocyanic acid in

the alleged 'gas chambers' in Auschwitz did not take place. The
supposed facilities for mass killing in Auschwitz and Birkenau were
not suitable for this purpose.
Finally, there is a study by Austrian engineer Walter Luftl, a
respected expert witness in numerous  court cases, and former
president of Austria's professional association of engineers. 
In 1992 report he called the alleged mass extermination of Jews in gas

chambers"technically impossible."

Discredited Perspective 

So just what constitutes "Holocaust denial"?Those who advocate
criminal persecution of "Holocaust deniers" seem to be still living in
the world of 1946, where the Allied officials of the Nuremberg
Tribunal have just pronounced their verdict. But the Tribunal's
findings can no longer be assumed to be valid. Because it relied so
heavily on such untrustworthy evidence as the Hoss testimony, some of
its most critical findings are now discredited.

Comment: 
There is a very real and growing cotroversy about what actually
happened to Europe's Jews during World War II. We believe the
"Holocaust" cotroversy should be resolved through free inquiry and
open debate in any forum(i.e. Newsgroups) that pertains to the
"holocaust" in one fashion or another.
 
 Brought to you by: 
The Institute of Historical Review  and The Noontide Press.
PO Box 2739
Newport Beach, California 92659           



From jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com Wed Nov 20 07:39:24 PST 1996
Article: 90608 of soc.culture.german
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.mag-net.com!aurora.cs.athabascau.ca!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news.bc.net!nntp.portal.ca!newsfeed.direct.ca!portc01.blue.aol.com!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!howland.erols.net!EU.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!cs.utexas.edu!news.tamu.edu!news.utdallas.edu!nrchh45.rich.nt.com!ferret.ocunix.on.ca!resurrect
From: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com ("Truth")
Newsgroups: soc.culture.german
Subject: Inside the Auschwitz 'Gas Chambers'
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 05:45:12 GMT
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc.
Lines: 285
Message-ID: 
Reply-To: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: user-168-121-85-52.dialup.mindspring.com
X-Server-Date: 13 Nov 1996 04:51:52 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
X-Resurrected-By: dave@ferret.ocunix.on.ca

Reposting article removed by rogue canceller.  See news.admin.net-abuse.announce
for further information.

1988 was a ver informative and likewise disturbing year. I was
appalled to learn that much of what I was taught in school about
twentieth-centrury history and World War II was a myth, if not a lie.
I was first amazed; then annoyed; then aware; the myth of the
Holocaust was dead. 

Like all American children borng during and after World War II, I was
taught about the genocide perpetrated by the Nazis on the Jews. By the
time I had reached college, except that I had some problems swallowing
the numbers of decedents, said to total some six million. But there it
stopped. I believed in the Nazi genocide. I had no reason to
disbelieve.

Some 24 years later, a very believing engineer  sat at his desk
working one snowy January afternoon in 1988, when the telephone rang.
This very believing engineer was about to receive a very shocking
history lesson, one which would cause him to question that the 50-year
old Holocaust lie and the application of that lie to generations of
childern. "Hello, this Robert Faurisson" -  and that very believing
engineer would believe no more.

I have for the past nine years worked with most, if not all, of the
states  in the United States having capital punishment. I design and
manufacture execution equipment of all types, including electrocution
systems, lethal injection equipment, gallows and gas-chamber hardware.

I have consulted for, or supplied equipment to, most of the applicable
states and the federal government. 

Because of my association with the states in this capacity, I  was
recommended to the Zundel defense as consultant on gas chambers by
Warden Bill Armontrount of the Missouri State Penitentiary.

After answering my telephone on that cold January afternoon, I met
with Dr. Robert Faurisson twice in Boston and, as a result of these
meetings, I was summoned to Toronto to meet with Ernst Zundel's very
able staff. 

Dr. Robert Faurisson had postulated 13 years ago that a gas-chamber
specialist should be sought who could evaluate the alleged gas
chambers in Poland and report on their efficacy for exection purposes.

Valentine's Day weekend found me and Carolyn, my wife of two weeks, in
Toronto. Two days of lengthy meetings followed, during which I was
shown photos of the alleged German gas chambers in Poland, German
doucuments and Allied aerial photographs. My examination of this
material led me to question whether these alleged gas chambers were,
in fact, execution facilities. I was asked if I would go to Poland and

undertake a physical inspection and forensic analysis resulting in a
written evaluation of these alleged execution gas chambers, some at
places I had never heard of.

After due consideration, I agreed and made plans to leave for Poland,
awaiting a time of minimal snow covering. Ialso stated that although
the photos and documents seemed to support the view that these places
were, indeed, not execution facilities, I would reserve final
judgement until after my examination and, if I determined that these
facilities were, in fact, or could have been, execution gas chambers,
I would state this in my report. The final report was to be utilized
as evidence in Ernst Zundel's defense in his pending criminal trial at
Toronto, and I had to be prepared to testify under oath. 

Preparations for the trip required me to take sample bags,
documentatin journals and tools. Because we were in a Communist
country, I would have to be careful with the tools. Very few tourists
carry hamers,chisels, star drills and tape measures while travelling.
I hid them in the lining of my valise and hoped for the best.Further,
I had maps of Poland, Czechoslovokia and Austria, in the event that we
might have to make  a hasty and unscheduled exit. And finally, I had
gifts with which we bribed the museum people to supply us with copies
of documents from the Museum Achives.

Our Staff

I was fortunate to have a competent and dependable party of
professionals: my wife Carolyn, my general assistant; Mr. Howard
Miller, draftsman; Mr. Jurgen Neumann,cinematographer; Mr.Tijudar
Rudolf, interpreter. All knew that, if caught, the Polish government
would take a dim view of our activities and purpose, let alone my
removal of froresic samples from national shrines and monuments.

And the two ex officio members of our party, Mr Ernst Zundel and Dr.
Robert Faurisson, who could not accompany us in person, but who
nevertheless were with us every step of the way in spirit.

The Trip 

On February 25, 1988, we left for poland. Neumann and Rudolf, the
Canadian contingent, joined me and the remainder of our team in
Frankfurt.
We arrived at Cracow in the late agternoon and spent our first night
at the Hotel Orbis. We consumed the first of our three decent meals
while in Poland. The following day we drove to Oswiecim(Auschwitz). We
arrived at the Auschwitz hotel and were greeted by the smell of
sulphur napthal disinfectant, a smell I had not ecountered for many
years. The hotel is apparently the old officers' quarters for the camp
. We ate lunch at the hotel dining room, a cafeteria style facility.
This was our first unindentifiable meal, starch soup and sundries.

We made a roconnaissance tour of the camp. lasting into the dim light
of the Polish afternoon and several snow squalls, a common occurrence.
We ate no supper, in that we found no place to eat in Auschwitz after
sundown our first evening.

The folling day we began our work in the alleged gas chamber at the
Aushwitz(camp) facility. Unfortunately, we were unable to accomplish
much due to constant interruptions by both official an unofficial
Sunday tours. Carolyn stood guard at one entrance and Tijudar at the
other, advising myself, Jurgen and Howard of their arrival. It was too
dangerours to take forensic samples and tape, so we left for
Birkenau(camp site) about noon. At Birkenau we bagan a four-hour walk
into the  damp Polish cold  and through snow squalls so dense we could
not see each other at a distance of a few feet. Unfortunately, we did
not expect to spend that much time walking through the camp and, since
vehicles are not permitted within the camp, we left Carolyn behind in
the car. Since we forgot to leave her the keys, she nearly froze in
the cold Polish afternoon. We visited the barracks, crematories
II,III,IV and V, the sauna and the alleged burning pits. We took
samples,documented our activities on video tape and in still photos,
and made scale drawings of these facilities, carefully documenting the
removal locations of all the forensic samples. We had to break into
the sauna building, since it was locked. 

At the crematory II, I descended into the depths of the alleged gas
chamber, a wet, dank subterranean place not visited by man in almost
50 years, since the building had been reduced to rubble, probably  by
a German military demolition team. Fortunately, there were fewer
guards and less pedestrian traffic, making working conditions
considrably better than they had been earlier at Aushwitz.
Having been instructed by our empty stomachs of the evening before, we
found and ate at the resteraunt at the bus station, the only
legitimate resteraunt in Auschwitz. We returned to the Aushcwitz hotel
for the night.

The following day,Monday, we again began our work at Auschwitz(camp
site), the Sunday tours having subsided. We were able to get our
samples, tapes and documentation. We had , by this time, obtained
blueprints of the alleged gas-chamber facility and were able to follow
the structural changes back to the dates in question. We also verified
the exi of the floor drain for the periods of alleged gas chamber
usage. Upon completion at Auschwitz, we drove again to Birkenau to
take our control sample at delousing facility 1. Unfortunately, the
building was locked and again we had to break and enter in order to
access the delousing chamber. Again we ate at the bus station, and
retired early to the Auschwitz hotel. 
Tuesday morning, while awaiting Tijudar's unsuccessful attempt to
obtain a can Zyklon B, Jurgen and I made a video tapes of locations
within the camp. We moved from the Auschwitz hotel to a hostel nearby,
obtaining newly vacated rooms. We ate at the bus station and retired
early.
On Wednesday morning (the 24th) we ate a very ejoyable breakfast of
ham, cheese and bread(our second decent meal in Poland) and began our
trip to Lublin to see the Majdanek camp site. After one final look in
at Auschwitz , we set off by car for Majdanek.

Majdanek 

Several hours late, we arrived at Majdanek(Lublin), and visited the
museum, the reconstructed alleged gas chamber and the crematory. We
finally arrived at disinfection(buildings) 1 and 2, and examined the
facilities. It was extremely difficult to work, in that a guard made
rounds every 10 or 15 minutes. The alleged gas chambers were blocked
by gates and not accessible for detailed inspection by the general
public. It was necessary for me to trespass beyond these gates in
forbidden areas. Again Caroly and Tijudar stood watch while I made
measurements and did a detailed examination in these areas. Once we
were caught short: I was forced to hurdle the gate, and was still in
the air and in mid-jump when the guard entered. Fortunately, he was
more interested in Jurgen and his camera to see me before I touched
ground. 

RETURN

The camp closed in early aftenoon and the guard rather nastily told us
leave. By three o'clock we were en route to Warsaw, a trip that would
take five hours through rain and snow. Our hotel reservation had been
fouled up but, fortunately, with the help of an embassy attache, we
were able to secure rooms at another hotel.
We had our third edible meal in Poland that evening, and went to bed
preparation for our trip home on Thursday. The following morning we
had breakfast and proceeded to the airport for our return trip. 
We boarded the Polish airlines plane after clearing customs - my
suitcase containing twenty pounds of the frobidden samples,
fortunately none of which were found. I did not breathe easy until we
cleared the passport checkpoint at Frankfurt. Our team split at
Frankfurt for the return trips to the United States and
Canada,respectively. After our return(on March 3), I delivered the
forensic samples to the test laboratory in Massachusetts. Upon receipt
of the test results, I prepared my report, combining my knowledge of
gas execution facilities  and procedures with the reasearch I had
completed  at the crematories and with retort manufacturers in the
United States. With the results of my research i believe you are all
familiar. Upon completion fo my report I testified at Toronto - but
that is another stroy.

1. GAS CHAMBERS

The results published in the Leuchter Report are the important thing.
Categorically, none of the facilities examined Auschwitz, Birkenau or
Lublin(Majdanek) could have supported, or in fact did support ,
multiple executions utilizing hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide or any
other alledgedly or factually  lethal gas.  Based upon upon very
generous maximum usage rates for all the alleged gas chambers,
totalling 1,693 persons per week, assuming these facilities could
support gas executions, it would have required sixty-eight(68) years
to execute the alleged number of six million persons. This must mean
the Third Reich was in existence for some seventy-five(75) years.
Promoting these facilities as being capable of effecting mass,
multiple or even sigular executions is both ludicrous and insulting to
every individual on this planet. Further, those who do promote this
mistruth are negligent and irresponsible for not investigating these
facilities earlier and ascertaining the truth before indoctrinating
the world with what may have become the greatest propaganda ploy in
history.  

2. CREMATORIES

Of equal importance are Exteminationist errors relating to the
crematories. If these crematories, operated at a theoretical rate of
maximum ouput per day, without any down time and at a constant pace(an
impossible situation), and we accept the figure of at least six
million executed, the Third Reich lasted for at least forty-two (42)
years, since it would take thirty-five(35) years at an impossible
minimum to cremate these six million souls. 
No one by any stretch of the imagination would allege(or even believe)
that the Third Reich ever lasted for seventy-five(75) or even
forty-two (42) years, yet they would have us believe that six million
souls were executed with equipment that could not possibly have
functioned, in less than one-seventh of the absolute minimum time
could possibly have taken.

FORENSICS

Forensic samples were taken from the visited sites. A control sample
was removed from delousing facility 1 at Birkenau. It was postulated
that because of high iron content of building materials at these camps
the presence of hydrogen cyanide gas would result in a
ferric-ferro-cyanide compound being formed, as evidenced by the
Prussian blue staining on the walls in the delousing facilities. 
A detailed anlaysis of the 32 samples taken at the Auschwitz-Birkenau
complexes showed 1,050 mg/kg of cyanide and 6,170 mg/kg or iron.
Higher iron results were found at all of the alleged gas chambers but
no significant cyanide . This would be impossible if these sites were
exposed to hydrogen cyanide gas, because the alleged gas chambers
supposedly were exposed to much greater quantities of gas than the
delousing facility. Thus, chemical analysis supports the fact that
these facilities were never utilized as gas execution facilities

CONSTRUCTION 

Construction of these facilities shows that they were never used as
gas chambers. None of these facilities were sealed or gasketed. No
provision was ever made to prevent condensation of gas on ,floor or
ceiling. No provision ever existed to exhaust the air-gas mixture from
these buildings No provision ever existed to introduce or to
distribute the gas throughout the chamber. No explosion proof lighting
existed  and no attempt was ever made to prevent gas from entering the
crematories, even though the gas is highly explosive. No attempt was
made to protect operating personnel from exposure to the gas or tho
protec other non-participating persons from exposure. Specifically, at
Auschwitz, a floor drain in the alleged gas chamber was connected
directly to to the camp's storm drain system. At Majdanek a depressed
walkway around the alleged gas chambers would have collected gas
seepage and resulted in a death trap for camp personnel. No exhaoust
stacks ever existed. Hydrogen cyanide gas is an extremely dangerous
and lethal gas, and nowhere were there any provisions to effect any
amount of safe handling. The chambers were too small to accommodate
more than a small fraction of the alleged numbers. Plain and simple,
these facilities could not have operated as execution gas chambers.

CONCLUSION

After a thorough examination of the alleged execution facilities in
Poland and their associated crematories, the only  conclusion that can
be arrived at by a rational, responsible person is the absurdity of
the notion that any of these facilities were capable of, or were
utilized as, execution gas chambers 
 
Fred A. Leuchter,Jr.

The Institute For Historical Review and Noontide Press
PO Box 2739
Newport Beach, California 92659



From jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com Wed Nov 20 09:27:25 PST 1996
Article: 91605 of soc.culture.jewish
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!noc.van.hookup.net!nic.mtl.hookup.net!rcogate.rco.qc.ca!n3ott.istar!ott.istar!istar.net!winternet.com!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.mindspring.com!usenet
From: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com ("Truth")
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
Subject: Who Rules America?
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 05:30:15 GMT
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc.
Lines: 607
Message-ID: <56gs1s$mu4@camel4.mindspring.com>
Reply-To: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: user-168-121-85-52.dialup.mindspring.com
X-Server-Date: 15 Nov 1996 04:37:16 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

There is no greater power in the world today than that wielded by the
manipulators of public opinion in America. No king or pope of old, no
conquering general or high priest ever disposed of a power even
remotely approaching that of the few dozen men who control America's
mass news and entertainment media. 

Their power is not distant and impersonal; it reaches into every home
in America, and  it works its will during nearly every waking hour. It

is the power which shapes and molds the mind of virtually every
citzen, young or old, rich or poor, simple or sophicticated. 

The mass media form for us our image of the world and then tell us
what to think about that image. Essentially everthing we know,or think
we know, about events outside our own neighborhood or circle of
acquaintances comes to us via our daily newspapers,our weekly news
magazine, our radio, or our television. 

It is not just the heavy-handed suppression of certain news stories
>from  our newspapers or the blatant propagandizing fo
history-distorting TV "docudramas" which charaterizes the opinion
-manipulating techniques of the media masters. They exercise both
subtlety and thoroughness in their management which they present to
us.

For example, the way in which the news is covered:which items are
emphasized and which are played down, the reporter's choice of
words,tone of voice, and facial expressions; the wording of headlines
; the choice of illustrations - all of these things subliminally and
yet profoundly affect the way in which we interpret what we see or
hear.
On top of this,of course, the columnist and editors remove remaining
doubt from our minds as to just what we are to think about it all.
Employing carefully developed psychological thechniques , they guide
our thought and opininion so that we can be in tune with the "in"
crowd, the "beautiful people", the "smart money." They let us know
exactly what our attitudes should be toward various types of people
and behavior in the context of a TV drama or situation comedy and
having the other TV characters react to them in the Politically
Correct way

For example, a racially mixed couple will be respected ,liked, and
socially sought after by other characters, as will a "take charge" 
black scholar or businessman, or a sensitive and talented homosexual,
or a poor but honest and hardworking illegal alien from Mexico. On the
other hand, a White racist - that is, any racially conscious White
person who looks in askance as miscegenation or at thr rapidly
darkening racial situation in America - is portrayed, at best, as a
despicable bigot who is reviled by the characters,or at worst, as a
dangerous psychopath who is fascinated by firearms and is a menace to
all law -abidiing citizens. The white racist "gun nut" in fact, has
become a familiar stereotype of TV shows. 

The average American , of whose daily life TV- watching takes such an
unhealty portion, distinguishes between these fictional situations and
reality only with dificulty, if at all. He responds to the telivised
actions ,statements and, attitudes of TV actors much as he does to his
own peers in real life. For all too many Americans the real world has
been replaced by the false reality that his urge to conform responds.
Thus, when a TV scriptwriter expresses approval fo some ideas and
actions through the TV characters for whom he writing, and disapproval

of others, he exerts a powerful pressure on millions of viewers toward
conformity with his own views.

And as it is with TV entetainment, so it is also with the news,
whether televised or printed. The insidious thing about this form of
thought control is that even when we realize that entertainment or
news is biased, the media masters still are able to manipulate most of
us. This is because they not only slant what they present, but they
establish tacit boundaries and ground rules for the permissable
spectrum of opinion. 

As an example, consider the media treatment of Middle East news. Some
editors or commentators are slavishly  pro-Israel in their every
utterance, while others seem neutral. No one, however, dares suggest
that the United States is on the wrong side in the Arab-Jewish
conflict and that it served Jewish interests rather than American
interests  to send US forces to cripple Iraq, Israel'  principal rival
in the Middle East.  Thus, a spectrum of permissible opinion, from a
pro-Israel to nearly neutral , is established. 
 
Another example is the media treatment of racial issues  in the United
States . Some  commentators seem almost dispassionate in reporting
news of racial strife, while others are emotionally partisan - with
partisanship always on the non-white side. All of the media spokesmen
without exception , however, take the position that 'multcultralism'
and racial mixing are here to stay, and that they are good things

Because there are differences in degree,however, most Americans fail
to realize that they are being manipulated. Even the citizen who
complains about "managed news" and "biased media" falls into the trap
of thinking that because he presented with an apparent spectrum of
opinion he can escape the thought controllers' influence by believing
the editor or commetator of his choice(hence Jewish playpen) It's a 
"heads I win, tails you lose"  situation. Every point on the
permissible spectrum of public opinion is acceptable to the media
masters - and no impermissable fact or viewpoint is allowed any
exposure at all, if they can prevent it. 

The control of the opinion -molding media is nearly monolithic. All of
the controlled media - television , radio , newspapers, magazines,
books, motion pictures - speak with a single voice , each reinforcing
the other. Despite the appearance of variety, there is no real
dissent, no alternative source of facts or ideas accessible to the
great mass of people which might allow them to form opinions at odds
with those of the media masters. They are presented with a single view
of the world - a world in which every voice proclaims the equality of
races, the inerrant nature of the Jewish "Holocaust" tale, the
wickedness of attempting to halt a flood of non-White aliens from
pouring across our borders, the danger of permitting citizens to keep
and bear arms, the moral equivalances of all sexual orientations, and
the desirability of a "pluralistic", cosmospolitan society rather than
a homogenous one. It is the view of the world designed by the media
masters to suit their own ends - and the pressure to conform to that
view is overwhelming. People adapt their opinions to it,  vote in
accord with it, and shape their lives to fit it. 

And who are these all-powerful masters of the media? As we shall see,
to a very large extent they are Jews.

Electronic New and Entertainment Media

Continuing government deregulation of the telecommunicatons  industry
has resulted, not in touted increased competition , but rather in an
accelerating wave of caroporate mergers and acquistions that have
produced a handful of multi-billion-dollar media congomerates.
Whenever you watch television , wheter from a local broadcating
station or a via cable or satelite dish; whenever you see a featrue
film in a theater or at home; whenever you listen to the radio or
recorded music; whenever you read a newspaper, book, or magazine - it
is very likely that the information or entertainment you receive was
produced and/ or distributed by one of these megamedia companies.

The largest media conglomerate today is Walt Disney Company, whoese
chairman and CEO, Michael Eisner, is a Jew. The Disney empire, headed
by a man described by one media anlyst as "a control freak", includes
several television production companies( Walt Disney Television,
Touchstone Television, Buean Vista Television), it own cable network
with 14 million subsribers, and two video prodution companies. 

As for feature films, the Walt Disney Picture Group, headed by Joe
Roth(also a Jew), includes Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures,
and Caravan pictures. Disney also owns Miramax Films, run by the
Weinstein brothers, who have produced such ultra-raunchy movies as the
"Crying Game", "Priests" and "Kids."

When the Disney Company was run by the Gentile Disney family prior to
its takeover by Eisner in 1984, it epitomized wholesome, family
entertainment. While it still holds the rights to "Snow White", under
Eisner the company has expanded into the production of graphic  sex
and gratutious violence. In addition to TV and movies, the corporation
owns Disneyland, Disney World, Epcot Center, Tokyo Disneyland, and
Euro Disney. 

Disney also sell annually well over a billion dollars worth of
consumer products:books,toys and clothing. In August 1995 Eisner
acquired Capital Cities/ABC, Inc, to create a media empire with annual
sales of $16.5 billion. Capital Cities/ABC owns the ABC Television
Network, which in turn owns ten TV stations outright in such big
markets as New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, and Houston.
In addition, it has 225 affiliated stations in the United States and
is part owner of several European TV comapnies.

ABC's cable subsidiary, ESPN, is headed by president and CEO Steven
Bornstein, who is a Jew. The coporation also has a controlling share
of Lifetime Television and the Arts & Entertainment  Network cable
companies. ABC Radio Network owns 11 AM and ten FM stations, again in
major cities such as New York, Washington, and Los Angeles and has
over 3,400 affiliates.

Although primarily a telecommunications company. Capital Cities/ABC
earned over $1 billion in publishing in 1994. It owns seven daily
newspapers, Fairchild Publications(Women's Wear Daily), Chilton
Publications(automotive manuels), and the Diversified Publishing
Group. 
Time Warner,Inc, is the second of the international media leviathans.
The chairman of the board and CEO, Gerald M. Levin, is a Jew. Time
Warner's subsidiary HBO is country's largest pay-TV cable network. 
Warner Music is by far the world's largest record company, with 50
labels, the biggest of which is Warner Brothers Records, headed by
Danny Goldberg. Stuart Hersch is president of Warnervision, Warner
Music's video production unit. Goldberg and Hersch are both Jews. 

Warner Music was an early promoter of "gangsta rap"." Through its
involvement with Interscope Records it helped popularize a genre whose
graphic lyrics explicitly urge Blacks to commit acts of violence
against whites. 
In addition to cable and music, Time Warner is heavily involved in the
production of feature films(Warner Brothers Studio) and publishing.
Time Warner's publishing division(editor-in-chief Norman Pearlstine, a
Jew) is the largest magazine publisher in the country(Time, Sports
Illustrated, People, Fortune) 

Levin maybe the number one magnate if the planned deal with Turner
Broadcating System is completed.(Merger finalized as of 1996). 
When Ted Turner, the Gentile media maverick, made a bid to buy CBS in
1985, there was panic in media boardrooms across the nation. Turner
had made a fortune in advertising and the had built a successful
cable-TV news network, CNN. Although Turner employed a number of Jews
in key excutive positions in CNN and had never taken public positions
contrary to Jewish interests, he is man with a large ego and  strong
personality and was regarded by Chairman William Paley and other Jews
at CBS as uncontrollable: a loose cannon who might at some time in the
future turn against them. Furthermore, Jewish newsmam Daniel Schorr,
who had worked for Turner, publicly charged that his former boss held
a personal dislike for Jews. 
To block Turner's bid CBS executives invited billionaire Jewish
theater, hotel,insurance and cigarette magnate Laurence Tisch to
launch a "friendly" takeover of the company, and from 1986 til 1995
Tisch was chairman and CEO of CBS, removing any threat of non-Jewish
influence there. Subsequent efforts by Turner to acquire a major
network have been obstructed by Levin's Time Warner, which owns nearly
20 percent of CBS stock and has veto power over major deals. 
Thus, despite being being an innovator and garnering headlines, Turner
has nerver commanded the wealth and power to be a true media master. 
Turner may have decided: "if you can't lick 'em join 'em" If TBS
merges with Time Warner, Levin will become Turner's boss, and CNN, the
only rival to the network news, will come under complete Jewish
control.(deal finalized) 
Viacom, Inc, headed by Sumner Redstone(born Murray Rothstein), is the
third largest megamedia corporation in corporation in the country,
with revenues of over $10 billion a year. Viacom, which produces and
distributes TV programs for the three largest networks, own 12
television stations and 12 radio stations. It produces feature films
through Paramount Pictures, headed by Jewess Sherry Lansing
Its publishing division includes Prentice Hall, Simon & Schuster,and
Pocket Books. It distributes videos through over 4, 000 blockbuster
stores. It is also involved in satellite broadcasting, theme parks,
and video games. 
Viacom's chief claim to fame, however, is as the world's largest
provider of cable programming, thorough its showtime, MTV,
Nickelodeon, and other networks. Since 1989 MTV and Nickelodeon have
acquired larger and larger shares of the juvenile television audience.
Redstone, who actually owns 76 per cent of the shares of Viacom($3
billiion), offers Beavis and Butthead as teen role models and is the
largest single purveyor of race-mixing propaganda to White teenagers
and sub-teens in America and Europe. MTV pumps its racially mixed rock
and rap videos into 210 million homes in 71 countries and is the
dominant culural influence on teenagers around the world. 
Nickelodean has by far the largest share of the four-to-11-year-old TV
audience in America and also is expandind rapidly into Europe. Most of
its shows do not yet display the blatant degeneracy which is MTV's
trademark, but Redstone is gradually nudging the fare presented to his
kiddie viewers toward the same poison purveyed by MTV.
With the top three, and by far the largest, media conglomerates in the
hands of Jews, it is difficult to believe that such an overwhelming
degree of control came about without a deliberate, concerted effort on
their part. 
What about the other big media companies? 
Number four on the list is Rupert Murdoch's News corporation, which
owns FOX Television Network and 20th Century Fox Films. Murdoch is a
gentile , but Peter Chernin, who heads Murdoch's film studio and also
oversees his TV production, is a Jew. 
Number five is the Japanese Sony Corporation, whose U.S.
subsidiary , Sony Corporation of America, is run by Michael Schulhof,
a Jew. Alan J Levine, another Jew, heads the Sony Pictures division.
Most of the television and movie production companies that are not
owned by the largest corporations are also controlled by Jews. For
example, New World Entertainment,proclaimed by one media analyst as
"the premiere independent TV program producer in the United States,"
is owned by Ronald Perelman, a Jew who also owns Revelon cosmetics.
The chairman at New World, Brandon Tartikoff(formerly head of
entertainment programming at NBC), is a Jew. The best known of the
smaller media companies, Dreamworks SKG, is a strictly kosher affair.
Dream Works was formed in 1994 amid great media hype by recording
industry mogul David Geffen,former Disney Pictures chairman Jeffrey
Katzenberg, and film director Steven Spielberg , all three of whom are
Jews. The company produces movies, annimated films,television
programs, and recorded music. Considering cash and connections that
Geffen, Katzenberg and Spielberg have, Dream Works may soon be in the
same league as the big three. 
Two other large production companies, MCA and Universal Pictures, are
both by Seagram Company, Ltd. The president and CEO of Seagram, the
liquor giant, is Edgar Bronfman Jr, who is also president of the World
Jewish Congress.
It is well known that Jews have controlled production  and
distribution of films since the inception of the movie industry in the
early decades of this century. This is still the case today. 
Films produced by just the five largest motion picture companies
mentioned above - Disney, Warner Brothers, Sony,Paramount(Viacom), and
universal(Seagram) - accounted for 74 per cent of the total box-office
receipts for the year to date(August 1995).
The big three in Television network broadcasting  used to be ABC, CBS,
and NBC. With the consolidation of the media empires, these three are
no longer independent, however, each was controlled by a Jew  since
its inception:ABC by Leonard Goldenson,CBS by William Palley and then
by Laurence Tisch, and NBC first by David Sarnoff and the by his son
Robert. Over periods of several decades these networks were staffed
>from  top to bottom with Jews. , and the essential Jewishness of
network television did not change when the networks were absorbed by
other corporations. The Jewish presence in television news remains
particularly strong. 
AS note ,ABC is part of Eisner's Disney Company, and the executive
producers of ABC's news programs are all Jews. Victor S Neufeld(20-20)

Bob Reichbloom(Good Morning America), and Rick Kaplan(World News
Tonight).
CBS was recently purchased by Westinghouse Electric Corporation.
Nevertheless, the man appointed by Laurence Tisch, Eric Ober, remains
president of CBS News, and Ober is a Jew. 
At NBC, now owned by General Electric, NBC News president Andrew Lack
is a Jew, as are executive producers Jeff Zucker(Today), Jeff
Gralnick(NBC Nightly News), and Neal Shapiro(Dateline)

THE PRINT MEDIA 

After television news, daily newspapers are the most influential
information medium in America. Sixty million of them are sold(and
presumably read) each day. These millions are divided among some 1,500
different publications. One might conclude that the the sheer number
of different newspapers across America would provide a safeguard
against minority control and distortion. Alas, such is not the case.
There is less independence, less  competition, and much less
representation of majority interests than a casual observer would
think. 
The days when most cities and even towns had several independently
owned newspapers published by local people with close ties to the
community are gone. Today most "local" newspapers are owned by a
rather small number small number of large companies thousands of miles
away. The fact is that only about 25 per cent of the country's 1,5000
papers are independently  owned; the rest have circulation belong to
multi-newspaper chains. Only 100 of the total number have circulations
of more than 100,000. Only a handful are large enough to maintain
independent reporting staff's outside their own communities: the rest
must depend on these few for all their national and international
news. 
In only 50 cities in America are there more than one daily newspaper,
and competition is frequently nominal even among them, as between
morning and afternoon editions under the same ownership. Examples of
this are are the Huntsville, Alabama, morning News and afternoon
Times; the Birmingham, Alabama morning post Herald and afternoon
Herald-Journal - all owned by the  Jewish Newhouse brothers through
their holding , Advance publications. 
The Newhouse media empire provides an example of more than the lack of
real competition among America's daily newspapers: it also illustrates
the isatiable appetite Jews have shown for all organs of opinion
control on which they could fasten their grip. The Newhouses own 26
daily newspapers, including several large and important ones, such as
the Cleavland Plain Dealer, the Newark Star -Ledger , and  the New
Orleans Times-Picayunne;the nation's largest trade book publishing
conglomerate,Random House, with all its subsidiaries; Newhouse
Broadcating, consisting of 12 television broadcating stations and 87
cable-TV systems, including some of the country's largest cable
networks; the sunday supplement "Parade", with a circulation of more
than 22 million copies per week;  some two dozen major magazines,
including the New Yorker, Vogue, Mademoiselle, Glamour, Vanity Fair,
Bride's, Gentlemen's Quaterly, Self, House & Garden, and all the other
magazines of the wholly owned Conde Nast group. 
This Jewish media empire was founded by the late Sumuel Newhouse, an
immigrant from Russia. When he died in 1979 at the age of 84, he
bequethed media holdings worth an estimated $1.3 billion to his two
sons, Samuel and Donald. With a number of further acquisitions , the
net worth of Advance Publications has grown to a more than $8 billion
today. 
The gobbling up of so many newspapers by the Newhouse family was in
large degree made possible  by the fact that newspapers are not
supported by their subscribers, but by their advertisers . It is
advertising revenue - not the small change collected from newspaper's
readers - that largely pays the editor's salary and yields the owner's
profit. 
Whenever the large abvertisers in a city choose to favor one newspaper
over another with their business, the favored newspaper will flourish
while its competitor dies. Since the begenning of this century, when
Jewish mercantile power in America became a dominant economic force,
there has been a steady rise in the number of American newspapers in
Jewish hands, accompanied by a steady decline in the number of
competing Gentile newspapers - primarily as a result of selective
advertising policies of Jewish merchants. 
Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership and
management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising revenue
that their editorial and news reporting policies are largely
constrained by Jewish likes and dislikes. It holds true in the
newspaper business as elsewhere that he who pay the pipe calls the
tune. 

Three Jewish Newspapers

The suppresion of competition and the establishment of local
monopolies on the dissemination of news and opinion have characterized
the rise of Jewish control over America's newspapers. The resulting
ability of the Jews to use the press as an unopposed instrument of
Jewish policy could hardly be better illustrated than by the examples
of the nation's three most prestigious and influential newspapers: The
New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post.
These three,dominating America's financial and capitals, are the
newspapers set the trends and guidelines for nearly all the others.
They are the ones which decide what is news and what isn't, at the
national and international levels. They originate the news; the others
merely copy it. And all three newspapers are in Jewish hands. 
The New York Times is the unofficial social, fashion, enterainment,
political, and cultural guide of the nation. It tells America's "smart
set" which books to buy and which films to see; which opinions are in
style at the moment; which politicians, educators, spiritual leaders,
artists, and businessmen are the real comers. And for a few decades in
the last century it was a genuinely American newspaper. 
The New York Times was founded in 1851 by two Gentiles, Henry J
Raymond and George Jones. After their deaths, it was purchased in 1896
form Jones's estate by a wealthy Jewish publisher, Adolph Ochs. His
great-grandson, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr., is the paper's current
publisher and CEO. The executive editor is Max Frankel, and the
managing editor is Joseph Lelyveld. Both of the latter also are Jews. 
The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York Times Co.,33
other newspapers, including the Boston Globe, purchased in June of
1993 for $1.1 billion; twelve magazines, including McMcall's and
Family Circle with circulations of more than 5 million each; seven
radio stations and TV broadcasting stations; a cable-TV system; and
three book publishing companies. The New York Times News Service
transmits news stories, features, and photographs from New York Times
by wire to 506 other newspapers, news agencies, and magazines.
Of similar national importance is the Washington,which, by
establishing its "leaks" throughout government agencies in Washington,
has inside track on news involving the Federal government.
The Washington Post, like the New York Times, had a non-Jewish origin.
It was established in 1877 by Stilson Hutchins, purchased from him in
1905 by John R McClean, and later inheireted by Edward B. McLean. In
June 1933, however, at the height of the Great Depression, the
newspaper was forced into bankruptcy. It was purchased at a bankruptcy
auction by infamous Eugene Meyer, a Jewish financier and former
partner of the infamous Bernard Baruch, industry czar in American
during the First World War. 
The Washington Post is now run by Katerine Meyer Graham, Eugene
Meyer's daughter. She is the principal stockholder and the board
chairman of the Washington Post Co. In 1979 she appointed her son,
Donald, publisher of the paper. He now also holds the posts of
president and CEO of the Washington Post Co. 
The Washington Post Co. has a number of other media holdings in
newspapers, television, and magazines, most notably the nation's
number-two weekly newsmagazine, Newsweek. In a joint venture with the
New York Times, the Post publishes the International Herald Tribune,
the most widely distributed English language daily in the world. 
The Wall Street Journal, which sells 1.8 million copies each weekday,
is the nation's largest-circulation daily newspaper. It is owned by
Dow Jones & Company, Inc, a New York corporation which also publishes
24  other daily newspapers and the weeky financial tabloid Barron's,
among other things. The chairman and CEO of Dow Jones is Peter R.
Kann, who is a Jew. Kann also holds the posts of chairman and
publisher of the Wall Street Journal. 
Most of New York' other major newspapers are in no better hands than
the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. In January 1993 the
New York Daily News was bought from the estate of the late Jewish
media mogul Robert Maxwell(born Ludvik Hoch) by Jewish real-estate
developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman. The Village Voice is the property of
Leonard Stern, the billionaire Jewish owner of the Hartz Mountain pet
supply firm. 

Other Mass Media 

The story is pretty much the same for other media as it is for
televison, radio, and newspapers. Consider, for example,
newsmagazines. There are only three of any note published in the
United States; Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report. 
Time, with  a weekly ciurculation of 4.1 million, is publlished by a
subsidiary of Time Warner Communications, the new media conglomerate
formed the 1989 merger of Time, Inc, with Warner Communications. 
The CEO of Time Warner Communications, as mentioned above, is Gerald
Levin, a Jew. 
Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington Post
Company, under Jewess Katherine Meyer Graham. Its weekly circulation
is 3.2 million.
U.S. News & World Report, with a weekly circulation of 2.3 million, is
owned and published by the aforementioned Mortimer B. Zuckerman, who
also has taken the position of the editor-in-chief of the magazine for
himself. Zuckerman also owns the Atlantic Monthly and New York's
tabloid newspaper, the Daily News, which is the sixth-largest paper in
the country. 
Or consider books. There are literally thousands of publishers in the
United States, and among these thousands are many with little or no
direct Jewish control;  there are some which acutually dare to publish
books not approved by the Jewish Establishment. But all of the latter
publishers are very small, and their books seldom reach the great mass
of American who buy their reading material from drugstore news racks
or from chain store bookstores. 
Among the giant publishing conglomerates, however, the situation is
quite kosher. Three of the six largest book publishers in the United
States, according Publishers Weekly, are owned or controlled by Jews.
The three are first-place Random House(with its many subsidiaries,
including Crown Publishing Group), third-palce Simon & Schuster and
sixth place  Time Warner. Trade Group(including Warner Books and
Little, Brown) 
As pointed out above, the Newhouse family owns Random House, and
Gerald Levin is CEO of Time Warner Communications, of which Time
Warner Trade Group is a division. Simon & Schuster is subsidiary of
Viacom ,Inc, of which the chairman and CEO is Sumner Redstone, as
already noted. Another publisher of special significance is Western
Publishing. Although it ranks only 13th in size among all U.S.
publishers, it ranks first among publishers of childern's books, with
more than 50 per cent of the market. Its chairman and CEO is Richard
Snyder, a Jew, who just replaced Richard Bernstein, also a Jew. 

Our Responsibility

Those are the facts of media control in America. Anyone willing to
spend a few hours in a large library looking into current editions of
yearbooks on the radio adn television industries and directories of
newspapers and magazines; into registers of corporations and their
officers, such as those published by Standard and Poors and by Dun and
Bradstreet; and into standard biographical reference works can verify
their accuracy. They are undeniable, and when confronted with them
Jewish Spokesmen customarily will use evasive tactics. "Ted Turner
isn't a Jew!" they will announce triumphantly, as if that settled the
issue. If pressed further they will accuse the confronter of
"anti-Semitism" for even raising the subject. It is fear of this
accusation which keeps many persons silent who know the facts. 
But we must not remain silent on this most important of issues!   
The Jewish control of the American mass is the single most important
fact of life, not just in America, but in the whole world today. There
is nothing - plague,famine, economic collapse, even nuclear war - more
dangerous to the future of our people.
By permitting the Jews to control our news and entertainment media we
are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence on our
political system and virtual control of our  government; we also are
giving them control of the minds and souls of our childern, whose
attitudes and ideas are shaped more by Jewish television and Jewish
films than by parents, schools, or any other influence. 
The Jew-controlled entertainment media have taken the lead in
persuading a whole generation that homosexuality is a normal and
acceptable way of life; that there is nothing at all wrong  with a
White woman dating or marrying a black man, or with White men marrying
Asiactic women; that all races are inheirently equal in ability and
character - except that the character of the White race is suspect
because of a history of oppressing other races; and that any effort by
Whites at racial self-presevation is reprehensible.
We must oppose the spreading of this poison among our people, and we
must break the power of those who are spreading it. It would be
intolerable for such power to be in the hands of any alien minority,
with values and interests different from our own. But to permit Jews,
with their 3,000 year history of nation-wrecking, from ancient Egypt
to Russia, to hold such power over us is tantamount to suicide.
Indeed, the fact that so many White Americans today are so filled with
a sense of racial guilt and self-hatred that they actively seek the
death of their own race is a deliberate consequence of Jewish media
control. 
Once we have absorbed and understood the fact of Jewish media control,
it is our inescapable responsibility to do whatever is necessary to
break that control. We must shrink from nothing in combatting this
evil power. which has fastened its deadly grip on our people and is
injecting its lethal poison into their minds and souls. If we fail to
destroy it, it will certainly destroy us. 

Comment:
And you thought the politicians were running the show? Ha!



































































From jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com Wed Nov 20 09:27:26 PST 1996
Article: 92036 of soc.culture.jewish
From: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com ("Truth")
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
Subject: How Jews purport the dissolution of the white race
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 07:37:55 GMT
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc.
Lines: 98
Message-ID: <56mc90$lre@camel0.mindspring.com>
Reply-To: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: user-168-121-85-52.dialup.mindspring.com
X-Server-Date: 17 Nov 1996 06:44:48 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!andromeda.vec.net!cssun.mathcs.emory.edu!gatech!csulb.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!hunter.premier.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.mindspring.com!usenet

RABBI ABRAHAM L. FEINBERG
says the one solution to racial conflict is interracial marriage.

For small-L Liberals-and most Canadians fall into this category - one
of the most nagging dilemmas of their creed is the gap between the
preaching and  the practice of racial equality. We support the civil
rights movement in the U.S.
This "no", this refusal to sanction the mixiing of the races, is the
final bastion of race hostility. Until we learn to fight our ingrown
fears of sexual relations between the races, the end of the race
problem will not be in sight. Only when we no longer raise our
eyebrows at the sight of a Negro holding hands with a white girl wit
the West have begun to tear the racial poison from its vitals. Such a
change will involve an inside-out remodelling of the white psyche, for
our fear of mixed marriages is deeply rooted. But the change must
begin sometime. Why not now??
One reason why not, according to those who bridle at the thought of
miscegenation, is that there is some basic, physiological
incompatibility between the races. Allied to this notion is the fear,
seldom expressed but nevertheless real, that "mogrelization" of the
races would somehow result in an inferior human product. Neither
notion stands up to close analysis.
Finnally, there is the objection (and perhaps"objection" is the wrong
word to apply to such an emotional attitude) that some races are
innately savage. According to this view - and it's surprising how many
earnest liberals half-believe it - the caos in the Congo and mob
violence in Harlem spring from a single black source. History shows,
however, that no race, regardless of its technological progress, has a
monopoly on savegery. 
By emphasizing these unhappy similarities between the races, I do not
mean to suggest that there are no differences. Of course there are.
Races do differ - in the frequency of blood-type distribution, in
taste  sensitivivity, in hairiness and perhaps in body smell(to cite
only a few areas where variations have been scientifically verified).
Furthermore, there are racial differences which at first glance seem
to support the segregationist view that some races are inferior. 
On intelligence involving symbolic analysis ,Negroes and Indians are
said to perform less well than Whites. And during the Second World
war, the percentage of negroes rejected by the draft on mental grounds
was six time the white percentage. These are real disabilities, and
leaders of the U.S. civil rights movement must recognize them and try
to overcome them. But Black disabilities have their roots in
generations of systematic, ghettoized, all-pervasive rejection and
repression by the whites.
Certainly, the mixed couple contemplating marriage a whole sea of
troubles that couples of the same race never encounter. So do their
childern. But their is some evidence to suggest that the barriers
imposed by society are beginning to crumble. In New York, interracial
marriages appear to be on the increase, although precise staticitics
are difficult to obtain because applicants for marriage licenses are
not required to state their racial origin. If anything, the law should

ecourage, not forbid, the intermingling of "bloods". Then the prestige

of the state would buttress a basic scientific would buttress a basic
scientific fact - and anthropology professors who now whisper their
defense of interracial would shout it from the housetops.
ONE WORLD,ONE RACE

But legislation cannot change the human heart. The only way we can
accomplish that, the only way we can achieve a Final Solution to
racial prejudice, is to create a melange of races so universal that no
one can preen himself on his racial "purity" or practise the barbarism
to safeguard it.
The deliber encouragement of interracial marriages is the only way to
hasten this process. And it may be that time is growing short. The
dominance of our world has begun to shift like cargo in listing
vessel, from the white races to the colored. The sooner we adjust to
this fact, the better it will be for our childern. For we might well
acknowledge, even the most enlightnened of us, that we will never
completely eliminate racial prejudice until we eliminate seperate
races.

Question:
Why  can't Arabs and Jewish settlers peacefully coexsist in Hebron as
whites and blacks are supposed to in the United States?

Why is an Arab marrying an Orthodox Jew shunned by Orthodox rabbis?

Why were Falasha Jews(black Jews) prohibited from donating blood in
Israel? Were they not kosher enough or was it because of their skin
color?

Why is racial mixing good for everyone else but the Jew?

Why is there not equal representation of Arabs on the Israeli
Kinneset?

Why is  there ethnic/racial partion of Arabs and Jews in the Jewish
State of Israel.

Why is it legal for Jewish settlers to tote Uzi sub machineguns in
areas mostly occupied by Palestinians? Why can't whites legally tote
this type of weapon in some parts of the United States, particularly
areas where there are heavy concentration of Jews?





From jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com Wed Nov 20 09:27:27 PST 1996
Article: 92225 of soc.culture.jewish
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.axionet.com!uunet!in3.uu.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.mindspring.com!usenet
From: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com ("Truth")
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
Subject: What did Benjamin Franklin say about Jews?
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 07:36:07 GMT
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc.
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <56mc5i$tqt@camel4.mindspring.com>
Reply-To: jimkonen@atl.mindspring.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: user-168-121-85-52.dialup.mindspring.com
X-Server-Date: 17 Nov 1996 06:42:58 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

South Carolina's Charles Cotesworth Pinckney was present
at the Continental Cogress meeting in 1787 in Phiadelphia where
the U.S. constitution was being written by the delegates. 
Pinkney kept a diary called "Chit Chat Around the Table During
Intermissions." Here is the quote from Pickney's famous diary.

"I fully agree with General Washington, that we must protect this
young nation from an isidious influence and penetration. That menace,
gentlemen, is the Jews.

In whatever country Jews have settled in any great number, they have
lowered its moral tone; depreciated its commercial integrity;
have segregated themselves and have not been assimilated; have sneered
at and tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that
nation is founded, by objecting to its restrictions; have built up a
state within the state; and when opposed have tried to strangle that
country to death financially, in the case of Spain and Portugal?

For over 1,700 years, the Jews have been bewailing their sad fate
in that they have been exiled from their homeland, as they call
Palestine. But, gentlemen, did the world give it to them in fee
simple,they would at once find some reason for not returning.
Why? Because they are Vampires, and vampires do not live on vampires. 
They cannot live only among themselves. They must subsist on
Christians and other people not of their race. 

If you do not exclude them from the United States, in this
Constitution, in less than 200 years they will have swarmed here in
such great numbers that they will dominate and devour the land and
change our form of government, for which we Americans have shed blood,
given our lives, our substance and jeopardized our liberty.
If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our descendants
will be working in the fields to furnish them substance, while they
will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you,
gentlemen, if you do not exclude Jews for all time, your childern will
curse you in your graves.

Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they will or how
many generations they  are away from Asia, they will never be
otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American's and will not
evern though they will live among us ten generations. A leopard cannot
change its spots. Jews are Asiatics, are a menace to this country if
permitted entrance, and should be excluded by this Constitutional
Covention."

Comment: Benjamin Franklin was one of the founding fathers of the
United States and  a noble statesmen. 
Is his statement about Jews no less true today?
Why would someone consider Ben Franklin to be an "anti-semite" if it
were not true?




Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor

© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012

This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and to combat hatred. Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.

As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.