Shofar FTP Archive File: people/g/griswold.leslie/1995/griswold.1295
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Sun Dec 3 09:06:47 PST 1995
Article: 6972 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Liberals egos...
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <30BEB481.6C2E@aimnet.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 1995 13:31:13 GMT
Lines: 35
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:9591 alt.politics.nationalism.white:6972 alt.discrimination:38862
Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski (jeannek@darkwing.uoregon.edu) writes:
> In article <30BEB481.6C2E@aimnet.com>, George Graves
> wrote:
> * Remember this Jeanne. If ONE person in this world, irrespective
> * of race refuses to mix his/her genes with a member of another
> * race, you and your entire movement lose.
>
> What movement is that, George? I think that adults should have the freedom
> to marry and have children with whomever they wish.
And we don't.
> It seems that you'd rather have people live in isolation to keep their genes
> pure.
Don't tell me you're FINALLY starting to get it?
> Many of the "whites" in America would find that their genes are quite
> colorful if they traced back a few generations.
Tell me, Crazy, when did "many" translate into "all"? You're setting
yourslef up to get some e-mail from Jeffrey G. Brown, unless, of coures,
he won't bother you because you're espousing goals that are near and dear
to his heart, ie race-mixing.
> Some of us (you call us "libs") know our ancestry and/or realize that having
> pale skin is not our utmost concern or crowning achievement in life.
Thus spoke Jeanneathustra, who just loves regaling us with stories about
her personal life. Say, Crazy, when are you gonna tell us about your
first hubby again?
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Sun Dec 3 09:08:09 PST 1995
Article: 9591 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Liberals egos...
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <30BEB481.6C2E@aimnet.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 1995 13:31:13 GMT
Lines: 35
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:9591 alt.politics.nationalism.white:6972 alt.discrimination:38862
Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski (jeannek@darkwing.uoregon.edu) writes:
> In article <30BEB481.6C2E@aimnet.com>, George Graves
> wrote:
> * Remember this Jeanne. If ONE person in this world, irrespective
> * of race refuses to mix his/her genes with a member of another
> * race, you and your entire movement lose.
>
> What movement is that, George? I think that adults should have the freedom
> to marry and have children with whomever they wish.
And we don't.
> It seems that you'd rather have people live in isolation to keep their genes
> pure.
Don't tell me you're FINALLY starting to get it?
> Many of the "whites" in America would find that their genes are quite
> colorful if they traced back a few generations.
Tell me, Crazy, when did "many" translate into "all"? You're setting
yourslef up to get some e-mail from Jeffrey G. Brown, unless, of coures,
he won't bother you because you're espousing goals that are near and dear
to his heart, ie race-mixing.
> Some of us (you call us "libs") know our ancestry and/or realize that having
> pale skin is not our utmost concern or crowning achievement in life.
Thus spoke Jeanneathustra, who just loves regaling us with stories about
her personal life. Say, Crazy, when are you gonna tell us about your
first hubby again?
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Sun Dec 3 09:08:10 PST 1995
Article: 9592 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Richards in '96
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <49oh11$hnl@daryl.scsn.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 1995 13:33:36 GMT
Lines: 31
Marcus W. Marlow (marlow@scsn.net) writes:
> CLOC is considering nominating our very own Racial Theorist,
> R.C. Richards, to run for the office of President of the United States
> in 1996.
>
> Our brilliant political strategist has devised the perfect
> platform for R.C.'s campaign: We'll offer negroes their own homeland,
> located somewhere in Mexico, and pardon all incarcerated negroes who
> are willing to move to the new homeland (and take their families with
> them).
But how will these negroes figure out which picaninnies are theirs?
> With a platform like this, R.C. is a lead-pipe cinch to win the
> Presidency. Negroes and White People alike will turn out in droves to
> vote for him.
>
> Here's hoping you'll do the same.
>
> Hail R.C. Richards' candidacy!
>
> Hail Victory!
>
> In Service,
>
> Col. Marcus W. Marlow
>
> "Working around the CLOC for the White Race"
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Sun Dec 3 09:08:11 PST 1995
Article: 9593 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: If Whites are so superior...
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4997sh$25u@daily-planet.execpc.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 1995 13:54:57 GMT
Lines: 31
Rob Kowalewski (robk@rio.com) writes:
> In article , bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les
> Griswold) wrote:
(snip)
>> The original question was, if Whites are so superior, why are jews running
>> everything? My answer was, because a lot of Whites did (and still do)
>> make the mistake of believing that jews are white, when they most
>> certainly are not. Now, to expand a little on that: by misunderstanding
>> the racial nature of the jew, we have made the mistake of trying to
>> assimilate him, and allowing him access to the levers of our society.
> For no other reason than for your sake, Les buddy, let's say that's true.
>
> Sooooo...therefore access for non-whites to the levers of society
> eradicates the superior position of whites. Your superiority is vulnerable
> to the participation of others in society.
>
> What the hell is *superior* about that?
Easy, Wobbie. It's easier to destroy, than to build. That our
civilization is vulnerable to the antics of jews and other non-whites is
not proof that we aren't superior, just that our institutions were not
meant to be placed in the hands of inferior aliens with no understanding
of them.
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Mon Dec 4 06:55:40 PST 1995
Article: 14941 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Whites + Europe = Great Place Niggers + Europe = Dump
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <49oa0g$26e0@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <49p8gi$ai8@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 1995 10:19:55 GMT
Lines: 28
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:9738 alt.politics.nationalism.white:7102 alt.discrimination:38950 alt.revisionism:14941 alt.skinheads:6927
Truth or Consequences (n9s6m@netcom.com) writes:
> Les Griswold (bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) wrote:
> : ... and negroes in South Africa were, and are, better off than negroes
> : ANYWHERE ELSE on that laughable continent.
>
> Except Gabon. Annual GDP per capita of 5,000k. More than South Africa's
> $2500.
Really? So why wasn't Gabon the greatful recipient of all those itinerant
negroes? Simple: they'd rather go to where they can guilt the Whites
into doing the work for them, and lobby international opinion to be on the
side of "the poor opressed Blacks".
> Next only to Seychelles. They got oil there and are excavating it
> quite nicely, not like Nigeria. Here are some other African (or
> predominantly black) countries that have high GDPs: Suriname; Libya;
> Algeria; Mauritius, Botswana. All have GDP of at least $2000.
Ditto.
> Richer than Jamaica.
Wow! BIG claim there!
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Mon Dec 4 07:13:51 PST 1995
Article: 7036 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Europeans Defeat Enemies. Invaded by Aliens More than Africans Were.
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <48nvn3$34rk@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <48u9cb$1f3e@bigblue.oit.unc.edu> <493vg3$5m6@ixnews7.ix.netcom.com> <49bhj7$17pt@bigblue.oit.unc.edu> <49oj13$1pov@tako.info.ucla.edu>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 1995 00:52:14 GMT
Lines: 32
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:7036 alt.politics.white-power:9670 alt.discrimination:38900
Abdrool Kama (akama@ucla.edu) writes:
> potato@mo.net (Frank Weltner) wrote:
(snip)
>>... One-half the the per capita deaths on board slavers were deaths of the
>>crew from African diseases.
>>>
> Reasons why Europe came to africa and plundered it:
> 1-natural ressources(gold, diamond, ivory, tropical products etc..) After
> they lost most of their colonies in north America, the europeans beasts
> already used to stealing instead of paying for the gooods they get, turned
> their attention to Africa. Forced labor, pillaging, using populations against
> each other were the main features of the 150 years of hell we had to endure.
> What did we get in exchange: a few screwed up schools, our traditional values
> destroyed, rulers who care more about their european vacations than their
> people.
AND the opportunity to be educated far beyond anything that you could ever
have accomplished yourselves, you ignorant savage. Your medicine would
still be at the wave-the-fetish-in-the-air stage if it wasn't for Whites,
and you'd still be wallowing in the Stone Age.
I notice that you completely ignore Frank's point about half the deaths on
slve ships being the CREW from NIGGER diseaes. Why's that?
> Your devilish ancestors are the worse thing that ever happened to our beloved
> continent.
Likewise, you wild, untameable savage.
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Mon Dec 4 07:20:34 PST 1995
Article: 9670 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Europeans Defeat Enemies. Invaded by Aliens More than Africans Were.
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <48nvn3$34rk@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <48u9cb$1f3e@bigblue.oit.unc.edu> <493vg3$5m6@ixnews7.ix.netcom.com> <49bhj7$17pt@bigblue.oit.unc.edu> <49oj13$1pov@tako.info.ucla.edu>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 1995 00:52:14 GMT
Lines: 32
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:7036 alt.politics.white-power:9670 alt.discrimination:38900
Abdrool Kama (akama@ucla.edu) writes:
> potato@mo.net (Frank Weltner) wrote:
(snip)
>>... One-half the the per capita deaths on board slavers were deaths of the
>>crew from African diseases.
>>>
> Reasons why Europe came to africa and plundered it:
> 1-natural ressources(gold, diamond, ivory, tropical products etc..) After
> they lost most of their colonies in north America, the europeans beasts
> already used to stealing instead of paying for the gooods they get, turned
> their attention to Africa. Forced labor, pillaging, using populations against
> each other were the main features of the 150 years of hell we had to endure.
> What did we get in exchange: a few screwed up schools, our traditional values
> destroyed, rulers who care more about their european vacations than their
> people.
AND the opportunity to be educated far beyond anything that you could ever
have accomplished yourselves, you ignorant savage. Your medicine would
still be at the wave-the-fetish-in-the-air stage if it wasn't for Whites,
and you'd still be wallowing in the Stone Age.
I notice that you completely ignore Frank's point about half the deaths on
slve ships being the CREW from NIGGER diseaes. Why's that?
> Your devilish ancestors are the worse thing that ever happened to our beloved
> continent.
Likewise, you wild, untameable savage.
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Mon Dec 4 15:27:15 PST 1995
Article: 15004 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Whites + Europe = Great Place Niggers + Europe = Dump
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <49oa0g$26e0@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <49p8gi$ai8@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 1995 13:01:31 GMT
Lines: 30
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:7161 alt.politics.white-power:9792 alt.discrimination:38979 alt.revisionism:15004 alt.skinheads:6955
Steffanie (Yeti@ix.netcom.com) writes:
> In <49oa0g$26e0@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> speedy5@ibm.net (KT) writes:
>
>
>>
>>If the niggers lived in Europe. Europe would have been a dump. Just
> like
>>Africa is.
>>
>>Generally niggers were/are primitive creatures and would never have
>>established a civilization on their own.
>>
>
>
> But with the help of the white race, Africans were able to live in that
> stifling and restrictive subject of civilization known as South Africa.
> Aren't those Europeans sooooo thoughtful...
... and negroes in South Africa were, and are, better off than negroes
ANYWHERE ELSE on that laughable continent.
> I just wanted to make sure everyone saw this.
> You know, a good laugh can brighten anyone's day.
> I certainly got my yuks out of this post.
Are you sure you're not laughing because you're nervous?
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Mon Dec 4 15:27:16 PST 1995
Article: 15005 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Whites + Europe = Great Place Niggers + Europe = Dump
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <49oa0g$26e0@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <49ptej$lnk@larry.cc.emory.edu>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 1995 11:35:55 GMT
Lines: 26
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:9793 alt.politics.nationalism.white:7162 alt.revisionism:15005 alt.skinheads:6956 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:246628
william c anderson (libwca@larry.cc.emory.edu) writes:
> KT (speedy5@ibm.net) wrote:
>
> : Generally niggers were/are primitive creatures and would never have
> : established a civilization on their own.
>
> : Liberal people conveniently ignore this basic fact.
>
> Sigh.
>
> The fact is, Speed-o, you aren't a conservative--you're a nutcase. The
> opposite of what you are, therefore, is not "liberal," but "rational
> human being". Your constant insistence that, by your tired, sad racist
> tripe, you are opposing the "liberals" is an insult to decent, rational
> conservatives everywhere.
>
> But I shouldn't have to keep defending them; I am a liberal. Therefore,
> I've added alt.fan.rush-limbaugh to the newsgroup line, in the hope that
> you will be deluged with mail from angry conservatives.
That's very thoughtful of you. Perhaps, with those mail deluges,
conservatives can explain just what it is they think they're conserving?
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Mon Dec 4 15:43:23 PST 1995
Article: 7159 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,soc.culture.african.american
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Black Family Values - Ghandi is STILL a pain in the ass
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <49o8tb$26e0@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 1995 11:47:35 GMT
Lines: 20
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:9790 alt.politics.nationalism.white:7159 alt.discrimination:38977 soc.culture.african.american:108081
Rajiv K. Gandhi (anakin@pinc.com) writes:
> In article , bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA
> (Les Griswold) wrote:
(snip)
RKG:
>> > Noobody forces anybody to do anything.
Moi:
>> No, but choices CAN be limited by economics, tool.
>
> Stunning admission there Griswold. This applies to EVERYBODY, you know.
True enough, but in the case of negroes, the economics is limiting a VERY
LIMITED potential, one that could not (and has not) been developed without
HUGE handouts from the White race.
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Mon Dec 4 15:43:23 PST 1995
Article: 7160 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Liberals like to take statements and run with 'em (was: Liberals egos...)
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <30BEB481.6C2E@aimnet.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 1995 12:55:26 GMT
Lines: 56
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.discrimination:38978 alt.politics.nationalism.white:7160 alt.politics.white-power:9791
Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski (jeannek@darkwing.uoregon.edu), not knowing
how to use her editor, writes:
> In article , bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA
> (Les Griswold) wrote:
(snip)
> Did I say all, Les? Nope. I just don't think that anyone can be 100
> percent certain of their ancestry, even if they can trace their roots back
> for a thousand years. Children were orphaned and raised in adoptive
> families, women were raped, women falsely identified fathers of their
> children, etc. Shit happens, Les. It happened a thousand years ago, and no
> "White" person knows if a grandmother 200 generations back bore a child
> from one of these unions.
Nice attempt at casting doubt there, Crazy, but it isn't going to work.
Really, does anyone CARE if you, or your crazy liberal friends, doubts
his/her genetic heritage? What do we care if you loons are happy to
wallow in your ignorance? I mean, we've all seen or heard about monkeys
who will climb trees and chitter nervously, throwing their excrement at
whatever has them scared.
> How many generations does it take to become "White" again, Les? Is one
> occurance of miscegenation a thousand years ago enough to brand someone
> nonwhite. Maybe these White guys who like to smack their women around are
> doing it because of a recessive "Black Rage" gene, eh? You already said
> that anyone who has the urge to have sex with someone from a different
> race is genetically inferior.
No, Crazy, what I said was, that having the urge to have sex with someone
>from a different race was evidence of moral degeneracy. Actually BREEDING
with another race was _prima facie_ evidence of genetic inferiority, which
I suppose is another way of saying, "What have we lost?"
> Your American knuckle-dragger buddies may want to do a little genealogical
> research before they jump on the bandwagon to create separate homelands.
> They may end up living in an entirely different homeland than they'd
> expected. Les, you know that these folks who think that they're White or
> even white are only doing the grunt work for bring you true Aryans to
> power, when you will promptly boot their mongrel asses aside. BTW, what
> will you do with a couple of self-admitted race-mixers like the racial
> theorist and marlow? Can they be redeemed?
You know, you're pretty funny, the way you go on and on about R.T. and
Marlow. First of all, I never recall Marlow saying anything of the sort.
If you have such a statement archived, why don't you post it? If not,
shut up. Second of all, you're the only one I know who's still making an
issue of it. R.T. admitted it. He also stated that he no longer does it.
I believe him. End of story.
(snip, including Crazy's pathetic attempt at a flame)
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Mon Dec 4 15:43:24 PST 1995
Article: 7163 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: White woman asks
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 1995 13:16:51 GMT
Lines: 30
"Jenny M. Patterson" (jmpatter@ecst.csuchico.edu) writes:
> Hello
>
> I am a white and proud female from California. And I would like to know
> what I can do to help win the fight against these invaders that have
> plagued our land for so long. If anyone can give me any tips. my e-mail is
> jmpatter@ecst.csuchico.edu
>
> Thanks
> Jenifer
Write the National Alliance at:
National Alliance
P.O. Box 90
Hillsboro, WV
24946 U.S.A.
Or call them (voice mail) at: (304) 653-4600
Or check out the National Alliance webpage (yes, it's back up!) at:
http://www.natvan.com
Glad to be of service!
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Wed Dec 6 22:04:23 PST 1995
Article: 7340 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!ddsw1!news.mcs.net!news.exodus.net!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Liberals like to take statements and run with 'em (was: Liberals egos...)
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <30BEB481.6C2E@aimnet.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 1995 10:46:59 GMT
Lines: 30
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:9950 alt.politics.nationalism.white:7340 alt.discrimination:39088
rajiv gandhi, who still likes sending e-mail even after being asked to stop,
(rgandhi@sol.uvic.ca) writes:
> In article , bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA
> (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
>> No, Crazy, what I said was, that having the urge to have sex with someone
>> from a different race was evidence of moral degeneracy. Actually BREEDING
>> with another race was _prima facie_ evidence of genetic inferiority, which
>> I suppose is another way of saying, "What have we lost?"
>
> Bzzzt. Thanks for playing Griswold, but you get no prizes here, but maybe
> if you tell us just how blond Hitler was you might qualify for a boot to
> the head.
Pretty strong words, coming from a "dedicated pacifist".
> Genetically speaking, it is beneficial for racial integration. People of
> mixed parentage cannot be said to have lost anything, but to have gained
> everything. It is a mathematical fact of life, that interbreeding weeds
> out those genes which tend to case damage to any individual at a much
> faster rate than if breeding was confined to races. It lets the human
> species, of which there is only one, evolve at a faster rate.
Oh, bullshit. Your airy-fairy notions of mix-n-match genetic combinations,
where one can supposedly PICK which genes one passes to one's descendants, is
just so much hot air.
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Wed Dec 6 22:04:24 PST 1995
Article: 7342 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Liberals egos...
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <49fhmp$sa9@decaxp.harvard.edu>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 1995 00:21:50 GMT
Lines: 36
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:9953 alt.politics.nationalism.white:7342 alt.discrimination:39090
Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski (jeannek@darkwing.uoregon.edu) writes:
> In article , potato@mo.net
> (Frank Weltner) wrote:
> * > make any kind of a moral statement. The fact is that men can make lots of
> * > babies, and even if they have biracial children, they could still find a
> * > twelve-year-old HeeHaw Honey to bear his mightywhitey children.
> * The twelve year olds, it seems are seduced by black men over 27 years of
> * age. According to recent newspapers, 90% of the black girls 16 years old
> * and younger have babies to men over 27 years of age. They prefer young
> * girls, because they have less chance of having AIDS.
>
> Yeah, this same rationale also explains why child prostitution is so
> popular in Thailand, but neither example has a damn thing to do with the
> original subject of watering down white genes . The whole age thing
> goes along with the statements of such WP authorities as Rev. Ron, who
> indicated that he wanted a "woman" who would know her place, bear eight
> children, and live to please her husband. I don't know of any female over
> the age of twelve who would willingly enter into or romanticize such a
> servile relationship.
>
> * Sorry to bring this
> * up. I know it ruins your argument. But life is that way, isn't it?
>
> Frank, you just ran in here and waved your little dong around to distract
> me, and I gave you a swift knee and boot to the ass. Life sucks, huh?
Excuse me here, Crazy, but Frank refuted YOUR claim that it's White girls
who get knocked up at 12, and YOU kicked HIS ass? Hmm, must be some more
of that liberal logic...
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Thu Dec 7 08:25:37 PST 1995
Article: 15310 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish,soc.culture.african.american,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.rmii.com!newsjunkie.ans.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Why do Fascists Idolize Criminal Hilter and loser NAZIs?
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4a2dpv$e85@news3.cts.com> <4a55ch$4c5@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 1995 10:49:43 GMT
Lines: 22
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca soc.culture.jewish:17640 soc.culture.african.american:108270 alt.discrimination:39120 alt.revisionism:15310 alt.politics.white-power:10017 alt.politics.nationalism.white:7400
Fresh816 (fresh816@aol.com) writes:
> You are an extraordinary idiot. First of all, many Americans, who were
> not Communists, supported Hitler before we joined the war in '41, the
> leader of whom was probably Henry Ford, though Lindbergh and Disney were
> pretty outspoken in support of Hitler.
>
> Second of all, we joined the war, not to stop HITLER, but to stop STALIN.
Boy, we really did a good job THERE!
A little reminder: in May 1945, Hitler was dead. Stalin was still alive.
So WHO was stopped?
> If we didn't join the war effort, Stalin would have crushed Hitler (as he
> did already) and then taken ALL of Europe instead of just half.
Without lend/lease to save his commie bacon, Stalin and the bolsheviks
would have been toast by September 1941.
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Thu Dec 7 08:55:16 PST 1995
Article: 10016 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,soc.culture.african.american,soc.culture.african,soc.culture.african,nz.general
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Why everyone loves Nelson Mendela
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4a5o0h$16oa@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 1995 10:31:46 GMT
Lines: 26
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:10016 soc.culture.african.american:108268 soc.culture.african:33875
KT (speedy5@ibm.net) writes:
> scallon@kiwi.pyrotechnics.com (Brendan J. F. Scallon) says:
>
>>: Clearly all the Muslims, niggers, chinks etc. who ain't satisfied with
>>: the hospitality of the civilized Western World, could move back to THEIR
>>: homelands.
>>
>>Then shouldn't whites go back to Europe? Are you by chance American Indian?
>>
>
> North Am. belongs to the White race, simply because Whites founded and built
> the civilization we have today. Whereas all blacks have contributed zero-zilch.
> Someone's probably going to try *refute* me on that one, so here's a small
> reminder...
>
> Blacks: peanut butter and cotton gin.
>
> Whites: [looooooong list]
Something that people who brute around negro inventiveness never like to
talk about is: how many of their inventions (real or made-up) would they
have invented in Africa, that is how many were invented in a WHITE society?
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Fri Dec 8 09:49:37 PST 1995
Article: 7497 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: 3rd World "qualifications"
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 1995 10:52:33 GMT
Lines: 29
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:7497 alt.politics.white-power:10114 alt.discrimination:39151
Lester Toews (mct394@freenet.mb.ca) writes:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 1995, Les Griswold wrote:
>
>> 3rd World immigrants bitch and moan that their "qualifications" aren't
>> "raspected" here in Canada (I'll bet that much the same goes on in the
>> U.S.), and that they must therefore get service-sector jobs. Well,
>> considering that eye surgery is done with RAZOR BLADES in India, is it any
>> wonder that their "qualifications" aren't "recognized"?
>> Les
>
> It is never stated whether the blades are sterilized. As long as they are
> what is the problem?
>
> They still use saws and other assorted objects to cut people open; if
> they are sterilized what is the problem?
>
> What is so great about modern North American medicine when the doctor is
> prescribing pills instead of real treatment anyway?
My GOD, I do believe you're serious!
Taking a razor blade to someone's eye is NOT the same thing as boozing up
a shrapnel victim until he's drunk as a lord, then quickly sawing off the
limb that is/will go gangrenous. Really, Lester, you're mistaking
battlefield expedients with normal procedure.
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Sat Dec 9 09:51:28 PST 1995
Article: 10158 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: If Whites are so superior...
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4997sh$25u@daily-planet.execpc.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 1995 00:59:35 GMT
Lines: 69
Bryan Cowan (moo@value.net) writes:
(snip)
> Even if we did try to assimilate the Jew, we wouldn't necessarily allow
> him access to the levers of society.
But we have.
> In fact, as far as I know, we have not.
Then you're either really stupid and ignorant, or lying through your
teeth. Which is it?
> And also, if Whites are only superior in a society where they control
> things, then isn't that a qualified superiority (ie. they're only superior
> when they run things; put a White in the middle of Africa and he will
> become inferior)?
It's easier to destroy than to create. How many negro vandals can CREATE
the plate glass windows that they're so fond of destroying?
> Either Whites are *always* superior-put a White in the
> middle of Africa and he will still be superior to Blacks if he lives there
> 50 years-or Whites are not superior, at least in an inherent sense.
Put a White in the middle of Africa, and 50 years later, you'll probably
have running water, paved roads, ordered civilization, etc... all the
things that the negro race never has, and never will, create.
> Of course the race that has its hands on the levers of society will be in a
> position of superior influence in that society. So according to your
> logic, Les, if Jews have control of society, then they must be the
> superior race. But your belief is that that is NOT true-that the White is
> still superior even though the Jew runs things.
A sneak-thief is not superior to the man that he steals from, dummy.
BTW, that was really nice of you to clip out my answer, and then proceed with
your bullshit. About what we can expect from a leftist: I can't refute
what WAS said, so I'll refute what I WISH he had said, instead.
You postulate a single solitary White man in Africa, presumably surrounded
by negroes, and expand that to encompass the whole White race? Why
don't we look at the accomplishments of minority Whites in mostly negro
countries, as opposed to a negro minority in a mostly White country? I'll
submit the former Rhodesia as an example of the former, and the U.S. as an
example of the latter. Presumably, you have enough brain power to figure
it out...
> BTW, you still haven't answered the question: Why would the *superior*
> White race voluntarily hand over control of society to the Jewish race,
> even if they thought Jews were White? If one thinks Jews are White, then
> one will indeed end up having Jews in positions of power, but surely not
> enough to control EVERYTHING. Certainly there would be enough Whites left
> in positions of power to see what the Jews would be doing and to stop it?
Typical jewish theorizing: push out PROBABILITIES as if they were
ABSOLUTE CERTAINTIES. The fact is, it may indeed be LIKELY that Whites
would retain a majority of the postions of power to put the kibosh on
jewish machinations in time, but the plain fact is, they haven't. Look, I'm
getting tired of repeating myself over and over for you, with your whiny claims
that I haven't answered the question, when I've answered it every fucking time
you asked it. You even repeat it in that last paragraph, for crying out loud,
and answer it yourself (in the first sentence, for the slow-witted [hi,
Crazy!]) So get with it, or shut the hell up.
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Sat Dec 9 17:52:29 PST 1995
Article: 7558 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Fresh816 at it again (was: Devils at it again)
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4aajs1$6jl@news3.cts.com> <4ab5r5$abg@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 1995 20:07:52 GMT
Lines: 22
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:10193 alt.politics.nationalism.white:7558 alt.discrimination:39172 alt.revisionism:15568 alt.skinheads:7363
Fresh816 (fresh816@aol.com) writes:
> Daren, Daren, Daren
>
> Don't you realize that the minute you say "nigger," the whole bullshit
> argument about racism isn't about hate, it's about loving my race, goes
> right out the fucking window?
Yes, and Darren just avails himself of that argument SO OFTEN, doesn't he?
Stop stereotyping so that you can pick fights, jewboy.
> God, even for a Nazi you're an idiot. You don't even know how to
> whitewash yourself.
That's funny. Really, it is. And jews in the shtetls didn't know how to
wash themselves, period. Gen. Patton said that Orthodox Jews were a bunch
of pigs who stank.
> Semitic Avenger
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Sat Dec 9 18:06:47 PST 1995
Article: 10202 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: A question for liberals.
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <199512061957.LAA23266@infinity.c2.org>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 1995 20:23:20 GMT
Lines: 79
Brian Henderson (BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net) writes:
> whitewolf@alpha.c2.org wrote:
>
>>Ever since America began it's policy of integration of races and rampant
>>multiculturalism, it has slowly been destroyed.
>
> No, it has slowly been changed.
No, I think that Whitewolf *meant* destroyed, and he's 100% right.
> Does anyone want to bet that Mr. Whitewolf wasn't around in the age of
> non-multiculturalism? It's always the people who look back to the mythical
> "good old days" who make these statements.
Geez, what a maroon. Since the Brave New World of Multiracialism has been
around since 1965, a growing number of people will not have actually lived
through the days when the multiracialism WASN'T around.
But tell me, Bri, what's "mythical" about not having to lock your front
door at night? Not having to buy a Club for your car? Not having to
cheap out on your home furnishings, so that B&E artists won't rob you
blind? What's so "mythical" about that, and what's so bad about wanting a
return to that sort of situation?
>>Why do you inflict your twisted values onto the White, God fearing people
>>of America?
>
> First of all, the only one with twisted values around here are the
> racist idiots who think that they are normal.
"I'm rubber and you're glue; whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to
you."
> Secondly, I am white but an atheist. Do I fit in? How about all the
> black God-fearing people?
How about 'em? Holy niggers are funny, especially when they get evangilical.
>>It is obvious to anyone with an IQ above 10 that integration has been,
>>and will continue to be, a total failure.
>
> Funny, the last time I was checked, my I.Q. was 168 and it certainly
> isn't obvious to me.
Then open your fucking eyes, shit-for-brains.
>>You liberals in your ivory towers may not have to live amongst these other
>>races as some of us do.
>
> I think you mean conservatives in the ivory towers. They're the ones
> who keep giving all the tax breaks to the rich (ie. themselves).
Liberals AND conservatives deserve the racial hodge-podge that they have
BOTH worked so hard to bring about. Why, in your little mind, is the
opposite of a liberal automatically a conservative?
>>You may not of had the 'pleasure' of being attacked by these races, robbed
>>by these races, raped by these races, shot at by these races, murdered by
>>these races. Or had friends or family suffer at the hands of these races.
>
> I don't find pleasure in being attacked, robbed, raped, shot at or
> murdered by anyone of any race. Would you prefer having one of these
> done to you by whites? Or were you just flapping your lips?
Typical liberal weasel: "Whites do that sort of thing too, so it's not so
bad when non-Whites do it!"
>>You have betrayed your people. You have betrayed your children. You are
>>creating a nightmare world for your children to exist in!
>
> My people are human.
Coulda fooled us.
(snip)
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Mon Dec 11 23:02:19 PST 1995
Article: 7649 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.skinheads,alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!bwra.mcs.csuhayward.edu!lll-winken.llnl.gov!uwm.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Fresh816 at it again (was: Devils at it again)
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4ahrog$161@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 1995 00:00:27 GMT
Lines: 16
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:7649 alt.politics.white-power:10310 alt.skinheads:7460 alt.revisionism:15705
Fresh816 (fresh816@aol.com) writes:
> Lester, you're quickly growing tiresome.
I'm not here for your amusement, yid.
> First of all, for my religion to be Paleolithic, it would have to be several
> million years old. It ain't. I'ts about 4000 years old. But you've
> speaking figuratively, of course. The fact is that despite every effort of
> scumbags like you to squash us, we keep coming back, and it drives you crazy.
Yes, like tapeworms, bloodflukes, head lice, and other parasites. But
evetually, we'll get the right treatment, and it may be sooner than you think.
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Mon Dec 11 23:06:04 PST 1995
Article: 10310 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.skinheads,alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!agate!bwra.mcs.csuhayward.edu!lll-winken.llnl.gov!uwm.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Fresh816 at it again (was: Devils at it again)
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4ahrog$161@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 1995 00:00:27 GMT
Lines: 16
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:7649 alt.politics.white-power:10310 alt.skinheads:7460 alt.revisionism:15705
Fresh816 (fresh816@aol.com) writes:
> Lester, you're quickly growing tiresome.
I'm not here for your amusement, yid.
> First of all, for my religion to be Paleolithic, it would have to be several
> million years old. It ain't. I'ts about 4000 years old. But you've
> speaking figuratively, of course. The fact is that despite every effort of
> scumbags like you to squash us, we keep coming back, and it drives you crazy.
Yes, like tapeworms, bloodflukes, head lice, and other parasites. But
evetually, we'll get the right treatment, and it may be sooner than you think.
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Tue Dec 12 11:25:14 PST 1995
Article: 15740 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.fan.oj-simpson,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,soc.culture.african.american,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,soc.culture.jewish
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Black Family Values (They are Different?!)
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <30BF74ED.4157@aimnet.com> <4a8ipt$2b3@mothra.westworld.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 1995 10:44:54 GMT
Lines: 42
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.fan.oj-simpson:46413 alt.politics.nationalism.white:7671 alt.politics.white-power:10348 soc.culture.african.american:108497 alt.discrimination:39242 alt.revisionism:15740 soc.culture.jewish:18184
David McDuffee (mcduffee@netcom.com) writes:
> In article <4a8ipt$2b3@mothra.westworld.com>,
> cybernet wrote:
>
>>I'm sure that if your family values required you to get a job with
>>wages good enough to support a family, yet you realistically knew that
>>unemployment and underemployment was only natural for your social
>>class, you'd be pragmatic enough to develop family values not making
>>utopian assumptions that you'd be able to support a family. A few
>>years ago, a study found that the only way a typical poor Black woman
>>could raise a family outside poverty by marrying a man in her social
>>class, is if she married four of them. No doubt since then this has
>>become worse. I'm sure that if you were in that position, the family
>>values of those more wealthy would seem ridiculously unrealistic.
>
> This is a bunch of bigotted bullshit.
>
> Unemployment is natural for a social class?
>
> Black women make four times as much on welfare as black men can earn?
>
> Family values mean that men and women who have children stay together
> to raise them. Up until the 1960s, this was the norm in both black and
> white households. It was the norm during the Great Depression, when
> everyone faced more poverty and less hope of finding employment than
> they do today. Poverty is a very poor explanation for what we are
> seeing today. Ill-advised social programs, an "if it feels good, do it"
> attitude, feelings of entitlement, and refusal to delay gratification
> and develop self discipline are much more likely to be at the root of
> the problem.
That's good, David. Now, follow us through here:
BOTH white and black families have experienced the SAME societal
pressures, yet white families are disintegrating at a much lower rate than
negro families (if negro families are even formed at all, which is
unlikely). So, since the EXTERNAL stimuli are the same, we have to begin
looking at the INTERNAL, no?
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Tue Dec 12 13:37:44 PST 1995
Article: 7670 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Thank GOD! (was: Les has nothing in common with me?)
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4934jl$guu@piltdown.phantom.com> <49dhcm$h59@piltdown.phantom.com> <49gu00$rp6@bigblue.oit.unc.edu> <49nb1a$7uu@newsource.ihug.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 1995 10:11:32 GMT
Lines: 16
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:10346 alt.politics.nationalism.white:7670
Steve Garza (sgarza@csubak.edu) writes:
(snip)
> Furthermore, who was it who called to the Austrian Archduke Maximillion to
> take the throne of Mexico? That archbishop of Mexico was a Garza. Look it
> up. It was the rebels in Mexico who opposed that version of the Catholic
> church who rose up against them and killed poor old Max and overthrew not
> only the current leaders of the church, but did away with titles of
> nobility and the like.
Gee, that's nifty. Why did he have to go all the way to Austria to find
someone? Are you telling me that out of all the millions of Mexicans,
there wasn't one qualified to take the throne?
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Tue Dec 12 13:37:45 PST 1995
Article: 7672 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: C-FAR and its links to White Supremacy
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4ag9kn$2jcs@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <4ai8m9$gqe@news3.cts.com> <4aik05$amn@nizkor.almanac.bc.ca>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 1995 10:37:54 GMT
Lines: 46
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:10349 alt.politics.nationalism.white:7672 alt.discrimination:39243
Ken McVay OBC (kmcvay@nizkor.almanac.bc.ca) writes:
(snip)
> How about those crazy Heritage Front kids, playing "IT!" and
> harrassing the hell out of Toronto citizens?
My GOD, that's TERRIBLE, especially compared to the trashing of Gary
Schipper's home by a bunch of ARA soldiers.
> How about those crazy Heritage Front kids, standing around in
> front of anti-racists' places of employment and intimidating
> the hell out of both them and their employers?
HAHAHA!!! How many "anti-racists" are actually employed, Kenny?
> How about that kidder, the Coward Metzger, inciting Nazi
> Skinheads into murdering a defenseless immigrant?
How about that kidder Morris Dees, who admitted that he wouldn't have been
able to win the case against the Metzgers on the facts alone?
> "Neo-Nazi," hell. "Neo" implies a "new and improved" version,
> when what you're talking about are the selfsame criminals and
> bullies that terrorized Germany.
So now we're over 60 years old? WOW!
>>So much for excercising the First Amendment by passing out literature
>>that is not PC, i.e. Thought Crime. And this is in the US! I'd hate
>>to see how oppresive Canada is.
>
> 8 applications in 25 years - yup, that's oppressive as hell,
> eh, Yank?
More oppressive than the U.S. Actually, it's good that the government is
willing to be so oppressive.
Ever see what happens to a pressure cooker when you close the vents?
--
The National Alliance WebPage: http://www.natvan.com
Voice-mail: 1(304) 653-4600
P.O. Box 90, Hillsboro, WV 24946 U.S.A.
Les Griswold BMOC. e-mail: bn946@freenet.carleton.ca
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Tue Dec 12 13:37:46 PST 1995
Article: 7681 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!skypoint.com!umn.edu!news.eecs.umich.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!news.mtu.edu!msunews!uwm.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Hey, Civilized Man...
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4aftrr$17ev@bigblue.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 1995 10:10:11 GMT
Lines: 20
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:10359 alt.politics.nationalism.white:7681 alt.discrimination:39251
Steve Garza (sgarza@csubak.edu) writes:
(snip)
> I believe Les is a Neo-Nazi and he is not religious. We could be allies,
> but he views me as an enemy simply because I believe we can work to better
> all the races using eugenics. Ever heard of United We Stand, Divided We
> Fall, Les? We could form at least three states Les. One for whites only,
> one for those who want to continue in the traditional democratic Non-Nazi
> way, and the multi-racial Nazi state.
There's no such thing as a "multi-racial Nazi state". You're dreaming, boy.
> Does that sound acceptable Les?
Hey, don't pitch your snake oil to me, I'm not buying.
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Tue Dec 12 13:37:46 PST 1995
Article: 7682 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!skypoint.com!umn.edu!news.eecs.umich.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!news.mtu.edu!msunews!uwm.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Hey, Civilized Man...
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4agicv$hvr@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 1995 10:12:56 GMT
Lines: 14
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:10360 alt.politics.nationalism.white:7682 alt.discrimination:39252
Fresh816 (fresh816@aol.com) writes:
> Can you, with even the slightest bit of veracity, trace the "fault" of
> these diseases to the African people. Way I see it, it's white people who
> brought AIDS out of Africa. If you're interested in the most touted
> theory of how AIDS spread into the West, I'll post it, but I don't want to
> strain your brain unless your up for it.
Sure, jewboy. Is that the one where the FAGGOT airline attendant brought
it over, presumably after packing the fudge with a bunch of African
faggots? (whoops, I forgot -- he's "bisexual", as if there's a difference)
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Tue Dec 12 13:37:47 PST 1995
Article: 7683 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!skypoint.com!umn.edu!news.eecs.umich.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!news.mtu.edu!msunews!uwm.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Hey, Civilized Man...
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4agl72$qu8@ionews.io.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 1995 10:20:13 GMT
Lines: 35
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:10362 alt.politics.nationalism.white:7683 alt.discrimination:39254
lzaird (lzaird@io.org) writes:
> bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold) wrote:
>>... while you're drooling over negro achievements and contributions, would
>>you care to comment on two of the largest contributions from Africa? I'm
>>talking, of course, about AIDS and Ebola.
>
> Bubonic Plague... Wonderful little disease... Brought on by (wait for
> it) FILTH from Europe. Cured with a little cleaning up, and mabye
> taking out the trash occasionally so that the rats couldn't breed.
Yep. Europeans are smart enough to modify their habits when NOT modifying
them will result in death. How many negroes in Africa are STILL screwing
around like nobody's business, regardless of the presence of AIDS? How
many brothels are still open in Thailand and India despite AIDS?
> Brought to the new world, killed most of the Native population
1) So?
2) How about New World diseases that killed Europeans?
> and more than just a few newcommers. Now, if that isn't acheivment, I
> don't know what is!
> --
> lzaird's page http://www.io.org/~lzaird
>
> ++++ stop the execution of Mumia Abu-Jamal ++++
Give up already. Dey gonna roast dat boy!
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Tue Dec 12 14:08:16 PST 1995
Article: 10347 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Technological inferiority = moral superiority
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4a5pdp$16oa@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <30CAFF00.2C35@aimnet.com> <30CC2652.AAD@aimnet.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 1995 10:17:42 GMT
Lines: 40
George Graves (gmgraves@aimnet.com) writes:
> Les Griswold wrote:
(snip)
(they = liberals)
>> The "why" is simple: they're afraid of superiority (or even notions of
>> it) because they know that THEY'RE, with few exceptions, wretched
>> inferiors who would NEVER cut the muster in a meritocracy.
>>
>> > My contention is that brainwashing is at the bottom of this. Why else
>> > would all of these people work so hard to bring about something which
>> > is so absolutly NOT in their best interest?
>> > The next question to ask is if, indeed, this irrational liberalism and
>> > multiculturalism is a product of brainwashing, who would profit from
>> > a world reduced to such a base existance? Who was it who said "better
>> > by far to rule in hell, than to serve in heaven"?
>>
>> But you're granting that there is a nobility to liberalism that Milton
>> imparted to Lucifer. There isn't. Most liberals are wretched little
>> crawling creatures who whine and snivel when confronted. I've yet to see
>> (or even HEAR) of a liberal standing up like a man for his beliefs.
>
> Not exactly nobility, Les. I was refering to the Jew. HE would rather rule
> in hell (the earth reduced to a wretched planet with everybody living in
> poverty except him and his) than serve in heaven. The Jew is the
> brainwasher and it is in his best interest to bring everything down. He
> is using these poor, gullible, stupid liberals (which are his creations
> anyway) to help spread his gospel. Monkey see on TV, Monkey do.
> Appologies to Milton.
That's true enough. H.L. Mencken (I think) once observed that the Semite
simply has no conception of how to rule fairly or justly; this is
encouraging, because it means that jews simply don't know how not to push
their arrogance to extremes, and it's going to piss off a LOT of people
(heck, it already has).
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Tue Dec 12 14:08:17 PST 1995
Article: 10350 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Crazy Jeannie's so STUPID! (was: WP Race-Traitors)
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4934jl$guu@piltdown.phantom.com> <49dhcm$h59@piltdown.phantom.com> <49gu00$rp6@bigblue.oit.unc.edu> <49nb1a$7uu@newsource.ihug.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 1995 10:29:38 GMT
Lines: 90
Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski (jeannek@darkwing.uoregon.edu), demonstrating yet
again that perverse liberal fixation with regarding the past as immutable fact
about the future, writes:
(snip)
> Ahem . . . Hey, putz, read the following message from the racial theorist,
> formerly known as David Padgett, and look at the date:
>
> --------------------begin archived message------------------
>
> From: rtheorist@aol.com (R THEORIST)
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
> Subject: Re: They bed negresses, don't they?
> Date: 2 Aug 1995 21:12:37 -0400
> Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
> Lines: 37
> Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com
> Message-ID: <3vp7q5$mr6@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
> References: <3vm95i$p4c@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
> Reply-To: rtheorist@aol.com (R THEORIST)
> NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
Indeed, Crazy, I was gonna say the same to you: LOOK AT THE DATE! That's
August 2, 1995. That's four months in the past. I can see, however, that
you're going to have a grand old time picking scabs.
Also, why aren't you bothering to post the bit where he renounced his
attraction to dark women? Sorta punches a big hole in your argument,
doesn't it? However, I'm not surprised that you don't believe him:
liberals lie at every turn, so it's reasonable that they assume everyone
else does, too.
(big snip - Crazy getting her jollies with cut and paste)
> BTW, I'll also repost Marlow's message where he talked about sleeping with
> Black women:
>
> ---------------begin archived message-------------------
>
> From: marlow@scsn.net (Mark Thomas Gongloff)
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
> Subject: They bed negresses, don't they?
> Date: 30 Jul 1995 21:44:34 GMT
> Organization: South Carolina SuperNet, Inc.
> Lines: 30
> Message-ID: <3vgug2$kq@news.scsn.net>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: cola36.scsn.net
> X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.11
>
> I have been monitoring the insipid rantings of RTheorist for some
> time now, and I feel compelled to at last defend the image of the southern
> white man from the slings and arrows of RTheorist's blubbering.
>
> It is a sad truth that fornication with negresses is a practice
> that is condoned, even encouraged, among southern white men. I can still
> hear the schoolyard sayings: "The blacker the berry, the sweeter the
> juice;" "I'm gonna get me some of that brown sugar;" "I'm gonna eat me
> some of that dark meat;" and "Black absorbs heat."
>
> It is also a sad truth that I, like many of my peers, spent many
> hours obtaining "knowledge" (in the biblical sense) of the bitches of that
> race of primates.
>
> However, we certainly did not take the cows out in public.
> RTheorist should be grateful that the branches of his family tree are
> knotty and diseased; most self-respecting white fathers (with intelligence
> quotients in triple digits) would have promptly disowned a son who paraded
> a negress around as if she were a new Ford truck or a fresh rack of
> antlers.
>
> I also learned, fortunately, that fornication with lesser species
> only encourages the dissipation of our precious white genetic material. I
> therefore ceased to screw negro wenches a long, long time ago.
>
> So, you mongrels that would attack us, please attack those of us
> of intelligence and proper breeding; you will thereby be fighting your
> real enemy, at least. Drooling cretins like RTheorist do nothing but
> advance your cause.
>
> ---------------------end archived message-------------
Hmm... I read a lot there about Marlow having learned better. What IS it
with you people? You'd make a terrible therapist, Crazy, always bringing
up someone's unpleasant past. They admitted it, they also BOTH told us
that they had learned better. Why do you feel the need to keep harping on
about something that they've both admitted not to doing anymore?
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Tue Dec 12 14:08:18 PST 1995
Article: 10351 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!frankensun.altair.com!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: A poster-boy lib (was: What is an "Aryan": A question for so-called "white" people.)
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <199512061957.LAA23266@infinity.c2.org> <4acq9g$hvo@piano.synapse.net> <4aja3r$rcn@piano.synapse.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 1995 10:53:42 GMT
Lines: 53
Rob Vanderkam (rvanderkam@synapse.net) writes:
> On Sun, 10 Dec 1995 11:42:06 GMT, Les Griswold said...
>>
>>Rob Vanderkam (rvanderkam@synapse.net) writes:
>>
>>>If integration is a failure, then go back to Europe,
>>> if that's where your ancestors come from. But where did they
>>> come from before that?
>>
>>This raises an interesting question: if you're going to use the time
>>argument to justify repatriation, then how far back do we go? Do we
>>remove the Capoids in South Africa from that country? Just return the
>>whole damn thing to a verdant jungle, and let it all go to waste?
>>
>>This shows a typical liberal misunderstanding of the WP argument for
>>repatriation: we don't want to repatriate the negroes because "we were
>>here first". We want to repatriate the negroes because THEY DON'T BELONG
>>HERE, and they aren't wanted/don't fit in anywhere else except Africa.
>
> Ah, finally. Some meat in a racist statement. I'd like to learn more as
> I'm unfamiliar with modern racist arguments.
>
> Perhaps you would be so kind as to start by dealing with the two assumptions
> in your argument.
>
> Assumption #1)
> One can draw a line between races. So please tell me how that's done.
Don't be silly. Anyone who tells you that there is no substantive
difference between a negro and a white is full of it. And please don't
start wailing about mulattoes, quadroons, octoroons, and the whole rest of
it. Mulattoes are obviously neither white nor negro.
(just an interesting bit of trivia: did you know that Peter Ustinov is
one-eigth negro, ie an octoroon?)
> Assumption #2)
> Someone has to decide who fits where. What is that decision based on?
Nice question, obviously meant as a stumbling block. But it isn't. Just
because not EVERYONE who's concerned about the survival of the White race
can clearly delimit EVERY CASE, doesn't make our concern any less valid,
nor does it mean that there's no such thing as an Aryan. I would direct
you to Milton Kleim's excellent and comprehensive "National Socialist
Primer", which has a definition of Aryan that you can argue with to your
heart's content.
> Please take as much space as you need Les. >
I did.
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Tue Dec 12 14:08:19 PST 1995
Article: 10352 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!frankensun.altair.com!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: What is an "Aryan": A question for so-called "white" people.
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4ajcss$rcn@piano.synapse.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 1995 11:00:24 GMT
Lines: 59
Rob Vanderkam (rvanderkam@synapse.net) writes:
> On Sun, 10 Dec 1995 20:18:59 GMT, Milton Kleim said...
>>
>>Rob Vanderkam (rvanderkam@synapse.net) said to Whitewolf:
>>>
>>> Very revealing. I bet you cannot even define "Aryan". Why not show
>>> us I'm wrong?
>>
>>An "Aryan" is an individual descended from the autochthonous peoples of
>>the European countries, free of Levantine or Asiatic ancestry.
>
> Hello Milton,
>
> How do you know you don't have any "Asiatic" ancestry in YOUR blood?
Why do you suspect that he does?
> Did you know that it's most likely that the "Europeans" you speak of
> (I'm sure you mean Teutonic proto-Germans) were descended from the same
> people who gave us the East Indians, the Iranians, the Pakistanis, and
> the Italians and other Latins? That's where the term "Caucasian" comes
> from. The ancestors of all these people seem to have come from the Caucasus
> Mountain region on the Europe-Asian border.
Yes. So? Are you now going to tell us that the Dravidian refuse that
squats on the shores of the Ganges are TRUE Aryans?
> Also, it seems that migration of ideas, trade goods, language, and
> blood (by inter-marriage), and not just distinct peoples, was common
> throughout man's pre-history. The Caucasian migrations spread the
> source of teutonic culture all through the mediterranan world, the
> middle east, and northern Europe. And before it did that, it seems
> they came FROM the middle east out of Africa.
"...it seems". Could you be a little harsher in your statements? After
all, this sort of wishy-washyness is atypical of liberals.
> The only thing separating the blackest black from the whitest white is
> a million shades of gray. There is no hard line.
>
> Also, please define
>
> -autochthonous
> -European countries
> -Levantine
> -Asiatic
>
> Why? Because it sounds like you don't know. It sounds like you are just
> using geneo-babble to try to define a group of people to include the
> ones you want while discluding the ones you don't want, just like in
> a club. I don't see any biological or geographical reality in your
> answer. So define the words and start explaining why I shouldn't
> think you are making it all up.
No, it sounds like you're too lazy to look them up on your own.
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Tue Dec 12 14:08:19 PST 1995
Article: 10361 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!skypoint.com!umn.edu!news.eecs.umich.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!news.mtu.edu!msunews!uwm.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Hey, Civilized Man...
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References:
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 1995 10:15:50 GMT
Lines: 24
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:10361 alt.discrimination:39253
Rob Kowalewski (robk@rio.com) writes:
> In article , bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA
> (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
>> ... while you're drooling over negro achievements and contributions, would
>> you care to comment on two of the largest contributions from Africa? I'm
>> talking, of course, about AIDS and Ebola.
> Not that CM needs any help in dealing with you, Les, But I should point
> something out (in the interest of accuracy)-
>
> The US Centers for Disease Control, at the start of the AIDS outbreak, was
> able to track down the first modern documented case of the disease (whom
> they called *Patient Zero*). He turned out to be FRENCH CANADIAN male
> flight attendant.
Re-read my original message, Wobbie. I said it was CONTRIBUTED by Africa,
ie that's where it ORIGINATED. A faggot flight attendant doesn't exactly
help your case any, big fella. So now we're supposed to forgive Africans
because a pervert brought the disease over?
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Wed Dec 13 12:23:40 PST 1995
Article: 15862 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Black Africans will evolve and adapt to modern society.
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4934jl$guu@piltdown.phantom.com> <49dhcm$h59@piltdown.phantom.com> <49gu00$rp6@bigblue.oit.unc.edu> <49nb1a$7uu@newsource.ihug.co.nz> <30CC9254.B47@scott.net> <4ajd78$3gk@daryl.scsn.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 1995 10:13:43 GMT
Lines: 28
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:10486 alt.politics.nationalism.white:7784 alt.discrimination:39329 alt.revisionism:15862 alt.skinheads:7574
Marcus W. Marlow (marlow@scsn.net) writes:
> In article <30CC9254.B47@scott.net>, evil Beavis
> wrote:
>>Les Griswold wrote:
>>> No, Africans who were savages a few generations ago are STILL
>>>savages, only now they have automatic weapons to make them BETTER
>>>savages.
>>
>>
>>And trash from Canada, like you, was probably trash a few generations
>>>ago as well...
>>
>>eB
>
> And retards from high school, like evilBeavis, were probably
> retards from grammar school a few years ago, as well...
You're being too kind. You're assuming that evil "Foot-boy" Beavis has
the wherewithall upstairs to actually PASS Grade Three.
> In Service,
>
> Col. Marcus W. Marlow
>
> "Working around the CLOC for the White Race"
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Wed Dec 13 12:23:42 PST 1995
Article: 15865 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: WHAT PATTON SAID (was: Is Griswold making things up again?)
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4aajs1$6jl@news3.cts.com> <4ab5r5$abg@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4akd56$761@access5.digex.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 1995 10:51:07 GMT
Lines: 55
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:10490 alt.politics.nationalism.white:7787 alt.discrimination:39331 alt.revisionism:15865 alt.skinheads:7575
Michael P. Stein (mstein@access5.digex.net) writes:
(snip)
> Perhaps, but certainly not as many as Les Griswold. (I'll bet Patton
> never said that Hitler was tall and blond.) Note that Les gives no source
> for his quote. Not that it necessarily helps - when he gave a source for
> his supposed interracial rape statistics, it did not say what he claimed.
Here's just a sample for you:
(Gen. Patton attended a jewish religious service at "General" Eisenhower's
insistence)
"This happened to be the feast of Yom Kippur, so they were all collected
in a large, wooden building, which they called a synagogue, which was
packed with the greatest mass of stinking humanity I have ever seen. When
we got about halfway up, the head rabbi, who was dressed in a fur hat
similar to that worn by Henry VIII of England and in a surplice heavily
embroidered and very filthy, came down and met the General... The smell
was so terrible that I almost fainted and actually lost my lunch as the
result of remembering it." -- Gen. Patton's diary, Sept. 17, 1945
(regarding the plan to turn over German houses to jews after the War):
"Evidently the virus started by Morgenthau and Baruch of a Semitic revenge
against all Germans is still working. Harrison [a U.S. State Department
official] and his associates indicate that they feel German civilians
should be removed from houses for the purpose of housing Displaced
Persons. There are two errors in this assumption. First, when we remove
an individual German we punish an individual German, while the punishment
is not intended for the individual but the race. Furthermore, it is
against my Anglo-Saxon conscience to remove a person from a house, which
is a punishment without due process of law. In the second place, Harrison
and his ilk believe that the Displace Person is a human being, which he is
not, and this applies particularly to the Jews, who are lower than
animals." -- also from Gen. Patton's diary, Sept. 1945.
> Given his history of false claims, until and unless Les documents this
> with a source that checks out, I shall simply assume he got it from the
> same source he gets so many of his other assertions - the fevered delusion
> factory between his ears.
Translation: "If it's not what I want to hear, I'll moan long and loud
about the source."
> By the way, I rather doubt that Patton's opinion of Griswold would
> have been very favorable.
Possibly. But Gen. Patton's opinion of me is not under discussion. His
opinion of jews is.
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Wed Dec 13 13:24:25 PST 1995
Article: 7778 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!skypoint.com!umn.edu!spool.mu.edu!pravda.aa.msen.com!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Thank GOD! (was: Les has nothing in common with me?)
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4934jl$guu@piltdown.phantom.com> <49dhcm$h59@piltdown.phantom.com> <49gu00$rp6@bigblue.oit.unc.edu> <49nb1a$7uu@newsource.ihug.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 1995 00:07:59 GMT
Lines: 57
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:7778 alt.politics.white-power:10481
Steve Garza (sgarza@csubak.edu) writes:
> In article , bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA
> (Les Griswold) wrote:
>> > If people use a little
>> > restraint and can be convinced of changing their mating practices, then
>> > the goals that both you and I desire will be attainable.
>>
>> Stevie, I have news for you: we have NOTHING in common,
>
> No? More than 85% of my ancestry came from Europe. My mother is as white
> as anyone. I have Spanish, French, GERMAN, and American Indian ancestry.
> So some of my ancestors could have been building praymids in the new world
> and developing a culture while your's were being handed it.
... and hunting, torturing, killing, and eating each other. You see,
Stevie, the indians were, shall we say, homophagus, ie man-eaters?
And while you're waxing grandiose on the supposed past glories of your
woo-woo indian ancestors, take a look at where they are TODAY, especially
in comparison to the White race. We can and have put men on the moon,
pushed medicine to unheard-of heights, etc. While your red-skin savage
ancestors are sitting around, drinking Aqua-Net and bitching about "land
claims".
> Furthermore, who was it who called to the Austrian Archduke Maximillion to
> take the throne of Mexico? That archbishop of Mexico was a Garza. Look it
> up. It was the rebels in Mexico who opposed that version of the Catholic
> church who rose up against them and killed poor old Max and overthrew not
> only the current leaders of the church, but did away with titles of
> nobility and the like.
And what is Mexico today? A fucking dump, to which I wouldn't send a dog.
> My family in the new world can be traced back eight generations to one
> Blas Maria de la Garza Falcon who was an early settler of Carmargo Mexico.
> How long have you been here Les?
Long enough, bub.
(snip)
>> Stevie, just because you talk like us sometimes, you can't join the club.
>> Or, in other words, just because YOU classify yourself as a "fascist", and
>> some Nervous Nellies will call anyone to the right of Slick Willie a
>> "fascist", doesn't mean diddly to us.
>
> No Les. Maybe I don't want you allied to me. I'm sure there are real
> thinkers out there who really understand how eugenics is meant to work.
I guess this is where I'm supposed to be heart-broken that a beaner
wanna-be fascist doesn't like me?
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Wed Dec 13 13:24:26 PST 1995
Article: 7785 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Black Africans will evolve and adapt to modern society.
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4934jl$guu@piltdown.phantom.com> <49dhcm$h59@piltdown.phantom.com> <49gu00$rp6@bigblue.oit.unc.edu> <49nb1a$7uu@newsource.ihug.co.nz> <4aj1bi$69g@decaxp.harvard.edu> <4akcrf$cd8@decaxp.harvard.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 1995 10:25:30 GMT
Lines: 74
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:10487 alt.politics.nationalism.white:7785 alt.discrimination:39330
Stewart King (slking@scws34.harvard.edu) writes:
> Les Griswold (bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) wrote:
(snip)
> : WHICH part of this don't you understand? If you take SUPERIOR White
> : males, and cross-breed them willy-nilly with anything that has two legs, a
> : hole and a pulse, you're only controlling HALF of the genes that go into
> : it. That's hardly eugenics, or at least, hardly GOOD eugenics.
>
> The first problem with this is finding SUPERIOR White males.
You're a laugh-riot. You seriously expect me to believe that, say, Dolph
Lundgren is not superior to, say, Dom DeLuise?
> The second thing is, from a eugenics point of view, controlling half the
> genes is better than controlling none.
Yes, but controlling ALL the genes would be FAR better than just
controlling half of them. Why are you unable to see that?
> What would be "better eugenics"? Just killing people?
*sigh* No, Stewie...
Preventing people with bad/undesirable genes from breeding. No killing is
necessary. Why do you liberals have to put the worst possible spin on
ANYTHING that you don't agree with? Congenital defects can be prevented
>from passing on their defects to posterity, WITHOUT discomfitting them
significantly.
(I know, I know, at this point some liberal ninny [or pehaps many] will
jump up and scream that I would deny ANYONE their "right" to breed. Well,
what about my right not to be taxed into ruination to support the helpless
results of two wretches mating?)
(snip)
> : You know, Stewie, I used to think you were kind of funny. Now I just
> : think that you're a craven coward who'd sell out the honour of his race
> : and women anytime that he was physically intimidated.
>
> I'm just as realistic as you people. If anyone of any color or gender were
> to be threatened while in my company, I'd do anything I could to protect
> them. I'm an equal-opportunity tough guy. That's not saying much since
> I'm also a scrawny academic wretch, but it's not that I'm a weasel.
Sure, sure. I get a real kick out of this tough-guy hyper-individualism
that you liberals espouse: "If I saw ANYBODY, of ANY race, making
trouble, I'd get involved! ALL races commit crime!" But you know in your
putrid hearts, even though you won't admit it, that negroes commit FAR
MORE violent crime.
> On the other hand, I actually look for the sources of the violence in
> society rather than writing it off to the "nature" of some of the people
> involved (conspicuously not one's own).
So you're wrong. It wouldn't be the first time. The nature of a person
has a LOT to do with whether he's likely to commit a crime (esp. a violent
one).
> : > (this is all assuming it's all genetic) Aaaaand...
>
> : Try, with a straight face, to tell us that it's not.
>
> I actually do think a lot of aspects of intelligence are genetic. Racial
> genetic superiority isn't a concept that makes sense to me, though.
So? Does everything have to pass your A-OK before it can be true, now?
The arrogance of you liberals is amazing.
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Wed Dec 13 14:21:22 PST 1995
Article: 10488 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Crazy Jeannie's so STUPID! (was: WP Race-Traitors)
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4934jl$guu@piltdown.phantom.com> <49dhcm$h59@piltdown.phantom.com> <49gu00$rp6@bigblue.oit.unc.edu> <49nb1a$7uu@newsource.ihug.co.nz> <4aje3a$3gk@daryl.scsn.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 1995 10:33:40 GMT
Lines: 54
Marcus W. Marlow (marlow@scsn.net) writes:
> In article ,
> bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
>>Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski (jeannek@darkwing.uoregon.edu), demonstrating
>>yet again that perverse liberal fixation with regarding the past as
>>immutable fact about the future...
>
> and...
>
>>Indeed, Crazy, I was gonna say the same to you: LOOK AT THE DATE!
>>That's August 2, 1995. That's four months in the past. I can see,
>>however, that you're going to have a grand old time picking scabs.
>>
>>Also, why aren't you bothering to post the bit where he renounced his
>>attraction to dark women? Sorta punches a big hole in your argument,
>>doesn't it?
>
> Hang it up, Mr. Griswold. The real problem here is that these
> baboons haven't gotten any fresh material from their jewish handlers
> since August, so they've been in a holding pattern for months. Does
> any of the following sound familiar?
>
> "Have you stopped fucking your dog yet, Doogie?"
>
> "Les = Sylvie = etc. = etc."
>
> "Racial Theorist = Marlow = etc. = etc."
>
> "Racial Theorist likes black chicks."
>
> "Free Mumia Abu-Jamal."
>
> Any of that sound familiar? It should, and so should a lot of
> the other diarrhea they trail through this newsgroup. I've just
> stopped reading the morons altogether; and I'll continue to killfile
> them until someone tells me they've gotten some fresh material from the
> Zionist Anti-Defamation League, or wherever the hell it comes from.
Yes, I suppose you're right. The liberals have to keep up reflecting on
their old gossip, because it's beyond their mental capacities to come up
with anything new.
I suppose I really should be kinder to dumb animals.
> In Service,
>
> Col. Marcus W. Marlow
>
> "Working around the CLOC for the White Race"
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Wed Dec 13 14:21:23 PST 1995
Article: 10491 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: If Whites are so superior...
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4997sh$25u@daily-planet.execpc.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 1995 10:59:45 GMT
Lines: 13
Frank Weltner (potato@mo.net) writes:
> I don't get this anti-Jew thing. After all Einstein was a Jew. A lot of
> scientists are Jews. Many doctors are Jews.
>
> What's the problem? These aren't scum. These are successful people.
>
> They have given the Western World far more than they have taken from it,
> which is alot more than you can say about the blacks who take, take, take.
Sorry, Potato, but you're not gonna get the jews onside with THAT.
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Thu Dec 14 00:46:35 PST 1995
Article: 10576 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!skypoint.com!umn.edu!spool.mu.edu!pravda.aa.msen.com!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Why do racists shy away from jews?
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 1995 11:06:47 GMT
Lines: 18
This really puzzles me, why people who are right on the money about
negroes twist and turn to avoid telling the truth about jews. I can think
of three reasons:
1) They're AFRAID of the jews, and have a pretty good idea of what will
happen to them if they openly criticize God's Self-Chosen People.
2) They're ENVIOUS of the jews, and would like to have such a
materialistically successful people on board. Niggers are okay to
discriminate against, because they haven't got the financial clout of jews.
3) For whatever reason, they believe in DECEPTION. They either believe
that they will one day pull the rug out from under the jews, or they think
that they can avoid the semitic labels (ie, name-calling, such as "racist"
and "anti-semite!") by kissying up to the jews.
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Thu Dec 14 09:18:12 PST 1995
Article: 16003 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.rmii.com!newsjunkie.ans.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: WHAT PATTON SAID (was: Is Griswold making things up again?)
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4aajs1$6jl@news3.cts.com> <4akd56$761@access5.digex.net> <4ao4vk$jtd@access2.digex.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 1995 11:17:07 GMT
Lines: 97
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:10645 alt.politics.nationalism.white:7911 alt.discrimination:39425 alt.revisionism:16003
Michael P. Stein (mstein@access2.digex.net) writes:
> Alt.skinheads removed from followups.
>
> In article ,
> "Human Being" Les Griswold wrote:
>>Michael P. Stein (mstein@access5.digex.net) writes:
>>> Note that Les gives no source for his quote.
>
>>Here's just a sample for you:
>>
>>(Gen. Patton attended a jewish religious service at "General" Eisenhower's
>>insistence) ^^^^^^^
>
> Eisenhower wasn't a general?
He may have held the rank, but compare "General" Eisenhower to General
Patton. Which one more typifies the word?
>>"This happened to be the feast of Yom Kippur,
>
> Stop right here. What you originally wrote was:
>
>> That's funny. Really, it is. And jews in the shtetls didn't know how to
>> wash themselves, period. Gen. Patton said that Orthodox Jews were a bunch
>> of pigs who stank.
>
> It's not a case of not knowing how to wash. On Yom Kippur (which is a
> fast day, not a feast day!) it is not permitted. I suppose I cannot
> fairly blame you or Patton for not knowing this - a reasonable number of
> Jews do not know this.
Mikey, Mikey, Mikey...
Not washing for one day (or even several) will not make one, one's
clothes, filthy, nor will it create a stench powerful enough to make a
fighting man puke.
> Of course, it wouldn't have helped that this was in a DP camp right
> after a war, when luxury items such as soap might have been in short
> supply (as they had been throughout the war, most especially for Jews). I
> _do_ blame you for not taking this into consideration. I'm sure there
> were days during the campaign when Patton himself didn't exactly smell
> like Chanel #5. But of course, you'll say that's excusable. When it's a
> JOO, however, the tiny Griswold "mind" can only conclude that it's because
> the person is a JOO.
No, I won't. However, any NORMAL, DECENT person, upon attaining freedom
>from confinement, would wash. It's a psychological thing, but then again,
all bets are off when we're talking about jews.
> Oh, and I'd advise you not to look too closely at the history of
> personal hygiene in Europe among your noble white brethren. It might be
> too damaging to your delicate little Aryan psyche.
Not quite, Mikey. See, we Europeans have learned the benefits of keeping
clean.
Maybe you should join Crazy Jeannie in her obstinate refusal to
acknowledge time, and how what Europeans did centuries ago is NOT what
they do now.
(snip)
>>> By the way, I rather doubt that Patton's opinion of Griswold would
>>> have been very favorable.
>>
>>Possibly. But Gen. Patton's opinion of me is not under discussion.
>
> Who died and made you supreme dictator of what will and won't be
> discussed?
If you want to start a string about how Patton would have felt about me,
then go right ahead. Of course, as a typical jew, you'd rather usurp and
pervert something originated by a White man, so I guess it's up to us to
startr what you obviously can't.
>>His opinion of jews is. >
> So what? What is it about Gen. Patton - you know, the fellow who
> abused a hospitalized soldier with a 102 degree fever as a malingerer -
> that makes his opinion infallible? I could cite many famous people who
> would have an opinion of what you stand for that would make Patton's
> opinions of Jews look positively glowing. Would you accept that as
> evidence that you are wrong? Of course not - your stupidity and hypocrisy
> are invincible.
Getting kind of huffy, there, Mikey. Proof positive that the subject is
hitting close to home (for you lurkers, whenever a jew starts losing it,
that means you're really getting under his skin).
But no, I never said that Patton's opinions were infallible, just that
they happened to agree with mine. As for your slurs against Gen. Patton,
why don't *you* provide a little evidence, as you've admitted that I have
done?
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Thu Dec 14 10:09:25 PST 1995
Article: 7868 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!io.org!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Black Africans will evolve and adapt to modern society.
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4amujm$q67@decaxp.harvard.edu>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 1995 03:27:40 GMT
Lines: 66
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:10588 alt.politics.nationalism.white:7868 alt.discrimination:39402
Crazy Jeannie Kowalewski (jeannek@darkwing.uoregon.edu) writes:
> * > Les Griswold (bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) wrote:
> * > : You're a laugh-riot. You seriously expect me to believe that, say, Dolph
> * > : Lundgren is not superior to, say, Dom DeLuise?
> * Why should you? Granted, Dolph may be physically superior to Deluise, but
> * can you say that he is mentally superior?
>
> Okay, guys -- it's time for a reality check using LesLogic (tm). Les said this:
>
> ---------------Les begins to trip on his dick here-------------
>
> From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
> Subject: Re: Liberals egos...
> Message-ID:
> Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
> Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
> Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
> References: <49fhmp$sa9@decaxp.harvard.edu>
> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 10:55:09 GMT
> Lines: 77
> Xref: news.uoregon.edu alt.politics.white-power:30504
> alt.politics.nationalism.white:26071 alt.discrimination:43865
>
> Stewart King (slking@scws43.harvard.edu) writes:
>> Les Griswold (bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) wrote:
>>
>> : Liberals think that we really give two shits in a snowstorm what they do,
>> : and they seem to think that they're really trumping us when they tell us
>> : that they're off to engage in some heavy-duty race-mixing.
>>
>> Well, you asked.
>
> We never did. So why the angst that you guys show, thinking you've got us
> hoist over a crocodile pit by telling us that you're going/already have
> miscegenated? See, what you fail to understand is, that WANTING to engage
> in racial mixing is proof of moral and physical degeneracy. Already
> having done so is _prima facie_ evidence of genetic inferiority, and we
> don't miss you one bit. What the hell should we care about some softy lib
> having bred his/her genes out of the White race, for once and for all?
>
> ------------------end of message excerpt----------------
>
> Now, anybody who can remember back a few years knows that "superior" Dolph
> and his equally superior brother were both having a torrid affair with
> Grace Jones, an African-American actress, model, and singer. (Grace and
> Dolph were both in the James Bond film "View to a Kill.") These guys were
> race-mixers, and now Les claims that they're superior.
>
> Uh oh, Les. You have some explaining to do. Are the Lundgren brothers
> Aryan, White, or white, or are they just moral, physical and genetic
> degenerates? Huh?
Once again, Crazy demonstrates that someone's past must be forever held
over their heads, a scarlet letter as it were.
"A few years ago." Is that the best you can do, Crazy?
(BTW, I don't remember seeing Dolph in "View to a Kill". Where was he?)
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Thu Dec 14 10:09:28 PST 1995
Article: 7889 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Black Africans will evolve and adapt to modern society.
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4934jl$guu@piltdown.phantom.com> <49dhcm$h59@piltdown.phantom.com> <49gu00$rp6@bigblue.oit.unc.edu> <49nb1a$7uu@newsource.ihug.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 1995 03:22:20 GMT
Lines: 26
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.discrimination:39414 alt.politics.nationalism.white:7889 alt.politics.white-power:10612
Richard Marquez (gmarquez@netcom.com) writes:
> Les Griswold (bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) wrote:
> : (I know, I know, at this point some liberal ninny [or pehaps many] will
> : jump up and scream that I would deny ANYONE their "right" to breed. Well,
> : what about my right not to be taxed into ruination to support the helpless
> : results of two wretches mating?) ^^^^^^^^
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> If I'm reading you correctly, Les, you're against supporting the "helpless
> results of two wretches maiting", even if they are BOTH 'White' wretches.
>
> Correct?
Correct...
> And you would be quite fine with a product of race mixing that was a
> productive member of society (for example, ME).
>
> Correct?
Wrong-o, fuck-nuts. Geez, how many times do we have to go over this...?
RACE-MIXING IS WRONG. PERIOD.
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Thu Dec 14 10:18:47 PST 1995
Article: 10580 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Technological inferiority = moral superiority
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4a5pdp$16oa@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <30CAFF00.2C35@aimnet.com> <30CC2652.AAD@aimnet.com> <30CDC39A.45DD@aimnet.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 1995 03:05:45 GMT
Lines: 40
George Graves (gmgraves@aimnet.com) writes:
> Les Griswold wrote:
(snip)
>> That's true enough. H.L. Mencken (I think) once observed that the Semite
>> simply has no conception of how to rule fairly or justly; this is
>> encouraging, because it means that jews simply don't know how not to push
>> their arrogance to extremes, and it's going to piss off a LOT of people
>> (heck, it already has).
Sorry, that observation about the semites' inability to rule fairly was
made by Ezra Pound. H.L. Mencken did say something that was really funny,
though, and very true:
"The case against the Jews is long and damning; it would justify ten
thousand times as many pogroms as now go on in the world."
> Well, history tells us that the Eternal Jew, eventually overplays his hand.
> He has been trying to rule the world for 2000 years. Every country that
> he has ever infested, has gone along with him to some point, and then
> either tried to kill the entire lot, or thrown their asses out. Let's hope
> the evil thing stumbles this time as well.
There's no need to hope. The jews will fuck up again, just like they have
before, just like they can't HELP but doing.
> He is closer to winning this time than ever before, however because he has,
> using his power in media, created several generations of brainwashed minions
> called "liberals" who unwittingly and unthinkingly do his bidding.
That's true, but the jews have always had _shabbas goy_ to do their bidding,
and the concept of mercenaries is an old one. What's really going to be
funny, though, will be seeing how fast the liberal fellow-travellers abandon
their erstewhile hebrew companions when they finally realize that they're
backing a loser.
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Thu Dec 14 12:51:51 PST 1995
Article: 10580 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Technological inferiority = moral superiority
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4a5pdp$16oa@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <30CAFF00.2C35@aimnet.com> <30CC2652.AAD@aimnet.com> <30CDC39A.45DD@aimnet.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 1995 03:05:45 GMT
Lines: 40
George Graves (gmgraves@aimnet.com) writes:
> Les Griswold wrote:
(snip)
>> That's true enough. H.L. Mencken (I think) once observed that the Semite
>> simply has no conception of how to rule fairly or justly; this is
>> encouraging, because it means that jews simply don't know how not to push
>> their arrogance to extremes, and it's going to piss off a LOT of people
>> (heck, it already has).
Sorry, that observation about the semites' inability to rule fairly was
made by Ezra Pound. H.L. Mencken did say something that was really funny,
though, and very true:
"The case against the Jews is long and damning; it would justify ten
thousand times as many pogroms as now go on in the world."
> Well, history tells us that the Eternal Jew, eventually overplays his hand.
> He has been trying to rule the world for 2000 years. Every country that
> he has ever infested, has gone along with him to some point, and then
> either tried to kill the entire lot, or thrown their asses out. Let's hope
> the evil thing stumbles this time as well.
There's no need to hope. The jews will fuck up again, just like they have
before, just like they can't HELP but doing.
> He is closer to winning this time than ever before, however because he has,
> using his power in media, created several generations of brainwashed minions
> called "liberals" who unwittingly and unthinkingly do his bidding.
That's true, but the jews have always had _shabbas goy_ to do their bidding,
and the concept of mercenaries is an old one. What's really going to be
funny, though, will be seeing how fast the liberal fellow-travellers abandon
their erstewhile hebrew companions when they finally realize that they're
backing a loser.
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Fri Dec 15 07:15:52 PST 1995
Article: 16107 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: WHAT PATTON SAID (was: Is Griswold making things up again?)
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4aajs1$6jl@news3.cts.com> <4ao4vk$jtd@access2.digex.net> <4apn2k$ja@nizkor.almanac.bc.ca>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1995 02:50:49 GMT
Lines: 46
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.discrimination:39477 alt.politics.nationalism.white:7996 alt.politics.white-power:10752 alt.revisionism:16107
Ken McVay OBC (kmcvay@nizkor.almanac.bc.ca), wanting to join the "I can't tell
time" club, writes:
> In article ,
> bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold) wrote:
>
(snip)
>>Not washing for one day (or even several) will not make one, one's
>>clothes, filthy, nor will it create a stench powerful enough to make a
>>fighting man puke.
>
> Read some European history, Mr. Griswold.. there was a time
> when the "noble families" of Europe, "white" to the core,
> stunk like last year's garbage.
"... there was a time". I think that says it all, Kenny. When's the last
time an entire race forsook basic hygiene?
(snip)
> Sorry, but "normal, decent" folks during that period also
> stunk to high heaven, I suspect, there being no running water
> in many cities because of the destruction, and your vaunted
> ancestors didn't believe in bathing for centuries..
Even assuming your vile slanders are true, Mr. McOyVay, the point is,
when's the last time you heard of Europeans grunging out?
>>Not quite, Mikey. See, we Europeans have learned the benefits of keeping
>>clean.
>
> Can you spell "plague," Mr. Griswold?
> Syphilis?
Can you spell "centuries ago"?
> I thought not.
I thought not.
--
The National Alliance WebPage: http://www.natvan.com
Voice-mail: 1(304) 653-4600
P.O. Box 90, Hillsboro, WV 24946 U.S.A.
Les Griswold BMOC. e-mail: bn946@freenet.carleton.ca
From stefan@scott.net Fri Dec 15 07:15:57 PST 1995
Article: 16166 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!acara.snsnet.net!news.scott.net!usenet
From: evil Beavis
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Subject: Re: Black Africans will evolve and adapt to modern society.
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 1995 20:12:05 -0800
Organization: Scott Network Services, Inc.
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <30D0F595.503D@scott.net>
References: <4934jl$guu@piltdown.phantom.com> <49dhcm$h59@piltdown.phantom.com> <49gu00$rp6@bigblue.oit.unc.edu> <49nb1a$7uu@newsource.ihug.co.nz> <30CC9254.B47@scott.net> <4ajd78$3gk@daryl.scsn.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp133.scott.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b3 (Win16; I)
To: Les Griswold
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:10808 alt.politics.nationalism.white:8029 alt.discrimination:39504 alt.revisionism:16166 alt.skinheads:7788
Les Griswold wrote:
>
> Marcus W. Marlow (marlow@scsn.net) writes:
> > In article <30CC9254.B47@scott.net>, evil Beavis
> > wrote:
> >>Les Griswold wrote:
> >>> No, Africans who were savages a few generations ago are STILL
> >>>savages, only now they have automatic weapons to make them BETTER
> >>>savages.
> >>
> >>
> >>And trash from Canada, like you, was probably trash a few generations
> >>>ago as well...
> >>
> >>eB
> >
> > And retards from high school, like evilBeavis, were probably
> > retards from grammar school a few years ago, as well...
>
> You're being too kind. You're assuming that evil "Foot-boy" Beavis has
> the wherewithall upstairs to actually PASS Grade Three.
And what, praytell, is your "educational" background Les?
eB
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Fri Dec 15 09:50:01 PST 1995
Article: 7998 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Les has nothing in common with me?
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <49dhcm$h59@piltdown.phantom.com> <49gu00$rp6@bigblue.oit.unc.edu> <49nb1a$7uu@newsource.ihug.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1995 03:27:18 GMT
Lines: 31
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:10754 alt.politics.nationalism.white:7998
Steve Garza (sgarza@csubak.edu) writes:
> In article , moo@value.net (Bryan
> Cowan) wrote:
(snip)
>> Are you related to that Garza who was the archbishop of Mexico?
>
> To tell the truth, I honestly have no idea. I do know that some of my
> ancestors were weathly and lived in southern Texas in the Brownville
> region long ago. That's kind of interesting though, because that's where
> the revolutionary junta that overthrew Max and the Archbiship were located
> for a while.
Translation: I like the name and the mystique, so I'll go for fame by
association. I won't make any claims that people may call me on, and
embarass the hell out of me. I'll just drop hints, and let them assume.
>> As for me, I haven't been here *that* long. The Cowans in America date
>> back to around 1720 or so, and the Mutschlers (whom I most look like) only
>> go back to the 1840's in America. No matter how you look at it, the
>> homeland of the White/Aryan people is in Europe, not America.
>
> Yeah Les! If you don't have no "injin" blood, perhaps you ought to go back
> "home."
I AM home. The home MY ancestors built, WITHOUT any vital contributions
by your filthy indian ancestors.
Les
From stefan@scott.net Fri Dec 15 09:50:04 PST 1995
Article: 8039 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!acara.snsnet.net!news.scott.net!usenet
From: evil Beavis
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power
Subject: Re: Black Africans will evolve and adapt to modern society.
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 1995 22:46:35 -0800
Organization: Scott Network Services, Inc.
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <30D119CB.2D02@scott.net>
References: <4934jl$guu@piltdown.phantom.com> <49dhcm$h59@piltdown.phantom.com> <49gu00$rp6@bigblue.oit.unc.edu> <49nb1a$7uu@newsource.ihug.co.nz>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp133.scott.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b3 (Win16; I)
To: Les Griswold
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.discrimination:39507 alt.politics.nationalism.white:8039 alt.politics.white-power:10818
Les Griswold wrote:
> Wrong-o, fuck-nuts. Geez, how many times do we have to go over this...?
>
> RACE-MIXING IS WRONG. PERIOD.
Says who? A frightened loser like you, unable to deal with the real world?? I
think you confuse the detrimental effects of inbreeding (which your parents
obviously practiced) with "race-mixing"...
eB
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Fri Dec 15 10:13:29 PST 1995
Article: 10754 of alt.politics.white-power
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: Les has nothing in common with me?
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <49dhcm$h59@piltdown.phantom.com> <49gu00$rp6@bigblue.oit.unc.edu> <49nb1a$7uu@newsource.ihug.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1995 03:27:18 GMT
Lines: 31
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:10754 alt.politics.nationalism.white:7998
Steve Garza (sgarza@csubak.edu) writes:
> In article , moo@value.net (Bryan
> Cowan) wrote:
(snip)
>> Are you related to that Garza who was the archbishop of Mexico?
>
> To tell the truth, I honestly have no idea. I do know that some of my
> ancestors were weathly and lived in southern Texas in the Brownville
> region long ago. That's kind of interesting though, because that's where
> the revolutionary junta that overthrew Max and the Archbiship were located
> for a while.
Translation: I like the name and the mystique, so I'll go for fame by
association. I won't make any claims that people may call me on, and
embarass the hell out of me. I'll just drop hints, and let them assume.
>> As for me, I haven't been here *that* long. The Cowans in America date
>> back to around 1720 or so, and the Mutschlers (whom I most look like) only
>> go back to the 1840's in America. No matter how you look at it, the
>> homeland of the White/Aryan people is in Europe, not America.
>
> Yeah Les! If you don't have no "injin" blood, perhaps you ought to go back
> "home."
I AM home. The home MY ancestors built, WITHOUT any vital contributions
by your filthy indian ancestors.
Les
From stefan@scott.net Fri Dec 15 10:13:33 PST 1995
Article: 10818 of alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!acara.snsnet.net!news.scott.net!usenet
From: evil Beavis
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power
Subject: Re: Black Africans will evolve and adapt to modern society.
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 1995 22:46:35 -0800
Organization: Scott Network Services, Inc.
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <30D119CB.2D02@scott.net>
References: <4934jl$guu@piltdown.phantom.com> <49dhcm$h59@piltdown.phantom.com> <49gu00$rp6@bigblue.oit.unc.edu> <49nb1a$7uu@newsource.ihug.co.nz>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp133.scott.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b3 (Win16; I)
To: Les Griswold
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.discrimination:39507 alt.politics.nationalism.white:8039 alt.politics.white-power:10818
Les Griswold wrote:
> Wrong-o, fuck-nuts. Geez, how many times do we have to go over this...?
>
> RACE-MIXING IS WRONG. PERIOD.
Says who? A frightened loser like you, unable to deal with the real world?? I
think you confuse the detrimental effects of inbreeding (which your parents
obviously practiced) with "race-mixing"...
eB
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Sat Dec 16 08:39:08 PST 1995
Article: 16243 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: WHAT PATTON SAID (was: Is Griswold making things up again?)
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4aajs1$6jl@news3.cts.com> <4ao4vk$jtd@access2.digex.net> <4apn2k$ja@nizkor.almanac.bc.ca>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 02:42:58 GMT
Lines: 20
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:10911 alt.politics.nationalism.white:8119 alt.discrimination:39561 alt.revisionism:16243
Rajiv K. Gandhi (anakin@pinc.com) writes:
> In article <4apn2k$ja@nizkor.almanac.bc.ca>, kmcvay@nizkor.almanac.bc.ca
> (Ken McVay OBC) wrote:
>
> >Not washing for one day (or even several) will not make one, one's
>> >clothes, filthy, nor will it create a stench powerful enough to make a
>> >fighting man puke.
>>
>> Read some European history, Mr. Griswold.. there was a time
>> when the "noble families" of Europe, "white" to the core,
>> stunk like last year's garbage.
>
> It was said that one of the favorite games of the attendants of Marie
> Antoinette was to count the lice crawling around her neck.
Unsubstantiated lies.
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Sat Dec 16 08:39:09 PST 1995
Article: 16246 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.discrimination,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Another pissed-off lib (was: Black Africans will evolve and adapt ...)
Message-ID:
Sender: bn946@freenet3.carleton.ca (Les Griswold)
Reply-To: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
References: <4934jl$guu@piltdown.phantom.com> <49dhcm$h59@piltdown.phantom.com> <49gu00$rp6@bigblue.oit.unc.edu> <49nb1a$7uu@newsource.ihug.co.nz> <30CC9254.B47@scott.net> <4ajd78$3gk@daryl.scsn.net> <30CF9BCC.7E4B@scott.net> <4aq5iu$p94@news3.cts.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 03:06:56 GMT
Lines: 23
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.white-power:10913 alt.politics.nationalism.white:8121 alt.discrimination:39563 alt.revisionism:16246 alt.skinheads:7838
Steve Garza (sgarza@csubak.edu) writes:
> In article <4aq5iu$p94@news3.cts.com>, brittell@cts.com (Daren Brittell) wrote:
>
>
>
>> >Give me eight more months and that will be a retard in Graduate School.
> Thank
>> >you very much...
>>
>> Thank integration for lowering the standards that allowed you to be
>> able to make it to grad school.
>
> And given these lower standards, are you in graduate school? Do you even
> have a bachelor's degree?
>
> How come Les doesn't have a Ph D? Or do you Doctor Les? Hey everybody,
> that's his nickname now. Dr. Les, professor of buttheadology.
Gotcha! Arf, arf!
Les
From bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Sat Dec 16 08:39:10 PST 1995
Article: 16247 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!bn946
From: bn946@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Les Griswold)
Subject: Re: WHAT PATTON SAID (was: Is Griswold making things up again?)
Message-ID: