Matt Giwer has taken to complaining that "holohuggers" (people he doesn't agree with) are "complaining to root." However, the evidence he has collected doesn't, er, contain any email sent to his root. This is another case where one has to wonder if this is a troll, or just stupidity. By the way, Mr. Giwer has complained to _my_ ISP's root about my (accidentally) sending him two copies of an email. Doesn't bother me particularly, but it seems apropos: http://www.almanac.bc.ca/cgi-bin/ftp.pl?people/g/giwer.matt/email-voyager-root Anyway, below are the articles where Mr. Giwer reproduces the emails which he _says_ were sent to email@example.com, but which, er, weren't... - Jamie McCarthy (firstname.lastname@example.org), June 21st, 1996 Path: news.voyager.net!aanews.merit.net!imci3!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!netnews.worldnet.att.net!ix.netcom.com!news From: email@example.com Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: a surprise Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 09:34:48 GMT Organization: images incarnate Lines: 135 Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: tam-fl2-12.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Jun 21 2:36:46 AM PDT 1996 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Amazing here. After having their "declaration of submission" thrown back in their face the holohuggers have decided to resort to complaints to ROOT. I have gotten my third in the last six hours, of course with a CC to me as a threat. The only thing they have not made pubic yet is the strategy session they indulged in. For example here is the first and only email from OBC himself which arrived as I was creating this message, ===== Return-Path:
Received: (from smap@localhost) by ixmail3.ix.netcom.com (8.7.5/SMI-4.1/Netcom) id CAA14539; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 02:18:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nizkor.almanac.bc.ca(220.127.116.11) by ixmail3 via smap (V1.3) id sma014483; Fri Jun 21 02:17:58 1996 Received: by nizkor.almanac.bc.ca (Smail18.104.22.168 #8) id m0uX2RN-000oUTC; Fri, 21 Jun 96 02:23 PDT Message-Id: Date: Fri, 21 Jun 96 02:23 PDT From: email@example.com (Ken McVay OBC) To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: Mr. Schoedel's problem, Nizkor's solutions References: <199606210918.CAA29854@dfw-ix12.ix.netcom.com> In-Reply-To: <199606210918.CAA29854@dfw-ix12.ix.netcom.com> >On 20 Jun 1996 19:30:33 -0700, email@example.com (Ken McVay >OBC) wrote: >>In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, >>"reverend" Ronald Schoedel wrote: >>> Whew boy, is it getting weird in here...expensive 486's, >>> lack of FTP skills, whoa, is it any wonder the Zinkor website >>> is totally unaccesible to me and surely others >>We have taken note of the "reverend" Schoedel's inability to >>access our site, and his lack of patience, and given thanks that >>the _other_ 800 or so who do manage to obtain the 3000 pages they >>request daily are able to do so. > Given the fact that you appear to have passed the hat for a used 486DX25 >when it was damned near impossible to buy such a machine when the chip >was out of production, your scam artist nature is obvious. > And then we get to the claim that you wasted $1000 on UnixWorks rather >than LInux. >>We have become deeply concerned over the inability of some >>users to access the "reverend" Schoedel's very own Nizkor >>pages, and have taken steps to solve the problem. > Clear bullshit. You have not the least idea what you are talking about. >>In the meantime, those with tireless patience, and a desire to >>see the "reverend" Schoedel in full cry, are urged to explore >>URL http://www.almanac.bc.ca/hweb/people/s/schoedel-ronald/ >>We will announce appropriate solutions to the "reverend" >>Schoedel's problem within a short time. Until then, we urge >>the "reverend" to enjoy himself and have a nice day. >>As to Mr. Schoedel's lack of ftp skills, we can only wonder. >>With two ftp sites available, perhaps tutoring from his local >>ISP might be in order, so that he might find one of them; >>http://www.almanac.bc.ca/cgi-bin/ftp.pl? and >>ftp://nizkor.iam.uni-bonn.de/pub/nizkor/ work as they >>should, for those who understand how to configure and utilize >>their software. >>(The last time we checked, Europe was still on the net, altho >>we concede the "reverend's" unlikely to be able to find it.) > Rather someone deceived the contributors about the costs involved and >promised a web presense that was in no was delivered and someone took >the difference in their pocket. > It is also interesting that Nizkor had some sucker synagogue offer tax >reciepts BEFORE Nizkor had tax exempt status. In the US that is called >fraud. ===================================================================== Your mail has been returned to you, unread. This is either because: 1. You have filtered your mail through an anonymous remailer, or 2. Your userid is on our list of undesirable correspondents, and your email is automatically redirected to your mailbox by our gatekeeper. 3. Someone using your server has been persistently abusive, and your system administrators are unwilling to do anything about it. 4. We've let an error in our Gatekeeper's control file slip through, and you've been unfairly rejected. We check our logs carefully, and do our utmost to correct such errors, and we apologize if you have been rejected without reason. Our users monitor the newsgroup alt.revisionism on a daily basis; if you have an important issue which you would like to discuss with one of them, please post it there. The Nizkor Gatekeeper ===================================================================== ======= As you can see, these folks, these amateurs, these children, are trying to create an incident they can exploit as net abuse. These holohuggers are trying to create an issue to get poor little minus 163 IQ me. And of course they fail as usual. But what the hell, they are holohuggers. No one expects honesty from them. Nor when they put their collective heads together does anything but the lowest common denominator appear. Path: news.voyager.net!aanews.merit.net!imci3!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!netnews.worldnet.att.net!ix.netcom.com!news From: email@example.com Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: a typical example of a holohugger tactic Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 08:58:59 GMT Organization: images incarnate Lines: 91 Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: tam-fl2-12.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Jun 21 4:00:57 AM CDT 1996 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 You will note that this lying bastard son of a something or other insists upon creating an issue where there is no issue. And you will note that it contradicts the previous clain that complaints to root would be unethical. Yes, holohuggers are unethical. And, they lie. But of course to support the holocaust they have to be liars. Return-Path: Received: (from smap@localhost) by ixmail3.ix.netcom.com (8.7.5/SMI-4.1/Netcom) id BAA24381; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 01:22:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vixa.voyager.net(22.214.171.124) by ixmail3 via smap (V1.3) id sma024073; Fri Jun 21 01:22:49 1996 Received: from clmx46.dial.voyager.net (clmx46.dial.voyager.net [126.96.36.199]) by vixa.voyager.net (8.7.3/CICNet) with SMTP id EAA00053; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 04:22:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199606210822.EAA00053@vixa.voyager.net> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 04:23:02 -0400 From: email@example.com (Jamie McCarthy) To: firstname.lastname@example.org Cc: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: A discrepency among exterminationists... Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.misc,alt.bonehead.matt-giwer,alt.revisionism Followup-To: news.admin.net-abuse.misc,alt.bonehead.matt-giwer References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> Organization: Absence Software (A copy of this message has also been posted to the following newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.misc, alt.bonehead.matt-giwer,alt.revisionism) Cross-posted to news.admin.net-abuse.misc; emailed "FYI" to various people whom Giwer calls "hijackers" and several pro-free-speech acquaintances of mine, as well as Mr. Giwer himself of course. Matt Giwer states proudly and publicly that his goal is to take alt.revisionism and "make it useless" to everyone with whom he disagrees. He has so far tried to accomplish this chiefly through sheer posting volume. Quite an upstanding net.citizen is Mr. Giwer! In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com wrote (quoted in its entirety): : firstname.lastname@example.org (tom moran) wrote: : : >email@example.com (DvdThomas) wrote: : : >>Heck, since Dan Keren is using retreads, I may as well do the same: : : >Dvd, I don't think there is any need to justify using material that : >has been posted before. After all, the material is not posted out here : >just to convince the usual. It should be posted for the reasons of : >informing any new comers to alt.rev. : : I think it is an outstanding policy to return floods of reposts with : floods of reposts. : : After all the holohuggers think they own this conference. It is about : time they learned better. After all if a low IQ person such as I can do : what two of them now have said I have done, if everyone starts doing : this we may be able to firmly re-establish this as a conference on : revisionism. : : That is, make it useless to the hijackers. Nizkor will continue to maintain an archive on this net abuser's tactics and goals at: http://www.almanac.bc.ca/cgi-bin/ftp.pl?people/g/giwer.matt/net-abuse -- Jamie McCarthy http://www.absence.prismatix.com/jamie/ firstname.lastname@example.org Co-Webmaster of http://www.almanac.bc.ca/ Unless you specify otherwise, I assume pro-"revisionism" email to be in the public domain. I speak only for myself.
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Home · Site Map · What's New? · Search Nizkor