Archive/File: people/c/collins.doug/press/press-council-intervention.971205 Last-Modified: 1997/12/07 Victoria Newsgroup December 5,1997 FRONT PAGE Collins' Words Won't Retire as Another Complaint Gathers Steam Dave Clements Weekend Edition Staff The number of players in the ring for the next round with Doug Collins remains to be seen, but either way, a match is set. As reported in the Weekend Edition two weeks ago, Victoria's Harry Abrams is proceeding with his complaint against the infamous retired newspaper columnist Doug Collins and two newspapers who printed his work - The North Shore News and The Daily Victorian. The question now is how many others will pile on. Proceeding in the case as an individual. Abrams alleges Collins contravened the hate speech provisions of B.C.'s 1993 Human Rights Code, in several of his columns. The charges are very similar to those made by the Canadian Jewish Congress, in a case that wrapped up with a human rights tribunal decision Nov 12 to acquit Collins. The CJC placed all its eggs in one basket. The Congress took issue with a March 1994 column entitled "Hollywood Propaganda" in which Collins called the Holocaust "not only the longest-lasting, but also the most effective propaganda exercise ever." But Abrams believes his case has a better chance of landing a conviction. That's because Abrams believes, by presenting a cross-section of Collins' work, he can more clearly establish a pattern of hate. Now the Weekend Edition has learned the B.C. Press Council is considering intervening in the Abrams case, to challenge the constitutionality of the Human Rights Code's section 7(1)(b). That clause - which the Press Council failed to prove as unconstitutional in the CJC's case against Collins - prohibits the use of speech that is "likely to expose a person or a group of persons to hatred or contempt." Gerry Porter, the Press Council's executive secretary, says he will meet today with the incoming chair of the Press Council - former B.C. Conflict of Interest Commissioner Ted Hughes - to consider whether they should again intervene. Hughes does not take up his post until Feb. 1. "We were not intervening in the CJC case for Doug Collins, we were intervening for the Charter of Rights," Porter says. Abrams, who says he was "thrilled" when he heard of Hughes' selection as Press Council Chair, says he hopes the Press Council will eventually decide not to intervene. "I hope they decide to use their moral suasion to put a stop to these proceedings," says Abrams, who has criticized the Press Council for lacking teeth in controlling the practices of their member newspapers. The B.C. Civil Liberties Association - who also intervened in the CJC/Collins case to challenge the hate law - has not ruled out joining again but won't rush to do so, says the group's president, Kay Stockholder. "We don't have any plans to intervene immediately, but what we will be looking for is an opportunity to take the constitutionality of that section of the code beyond the human rights tribunal and to a judicial review," Stockholder says. Harinder Mahil, the province's deputy human rights commissioner, says if the Press Council and BCCLA decide to involve themselves, the commission will also consider intervening to defend the legislation, as it did in the CJC case. Frank Cox, one of the three Victoria men who published the Daily Victorian from 1993 to 1995, says he hopes both the Press Council and the BCCLA decide to intervene. "When you read the code, you realize the issue is a lot larger than just me," Cox says. According to Cox, on Dec. 15 lawyers involved will meet to discuss the case and a possible date for a hearing. Harry Abrams is currently the B.C. representative of B'nai Brith (Canada). However, when he launched his complaint he was not involved with the organization. -30-
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.