From Widmann@gnn.com Thu Jun 27 17:59:56 PDT 1996 Article: 46347 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e2a.gnn.com!pop.gnn.com!Widmann From: Widmann@gnn.com (Richard Widmann) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: Where smoke and flame stories come from Date: Sun, 23 Jun 1996 16:36:45 Organization: GNN Lines: 30 Message-ID: <4qk9hn$cbn@news-e2c.gnn.com> References: <4pq44f$2o8@sjx-ixn5.ix.netcom.com> <4qg08e$3e0@newsbf02.news.aol.com><4qi4o6$5eb@dfw-ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 68-222.client.gnn.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-GNN-NewsServer-Posting-Date: 23 Jun 1996 20:30:46 GMT X-Mailer: GNNmessenger 1.3 In article Daniel Keren wrote: >By the very same standards of debate which allow to claim that >there is no physical evidence for WW2. > >Go ahead, present your physical evidence that WW2 happened. Mr. Keren, you are very mistaken. It is quite easy to prove that certain things DID happen. It is very difficult to PROVE that something did NOT happen. That is why in our criminal justice system, the burden of proof is on the prosecution. The defense does not try to prove the innocence of their client, if they win, their client is found NOT GUILTY. How? Because the prosecution did not prove their case. The difficulty in proving that something did not occur relies on the ability to show its scientific impossibility or at least improbability. If you want to understand the strength of the revisionist case, go read Hilberg, Reitlinger, Dawidowicz, and Kogon - (you may certainly choose others.) Therein you will understand the revisionist argument. ******************************************************************* Richard Widmann C.O.D.O.H. http://www.valleynet.com/~brsmith/ ******************************************************************* From Widmann@gnn.com Fri Jun 28 07:18:45 PDT 1996 Article: 46456 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!hookup!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!lll-winken.llnl.gov!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e2a.gnn.com!pop.gnn.com!Widmann From: Widmann@gnn.com (Richard Widmann) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: How to make eyewitness testimony credible Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 07:42:55 Organization: GNN Lines: 38 Message-ID: <4qlukm$rg9@news-e2c.gnn.com> References: <4ql41m$avf@dfw-ixnews4.ix.netcom.com> <4qlf9e$5i7@newsbf02.news.aol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 49-84.client.gnn.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-GNN-NewsServer-Posting-Date: 24 Jun 1996 11:36:54 GMT X-Mailer: GNNmessenger 1.3 In article <4qlf9e$5i7@newsbf02.news.aol.com> PMccutc103 wrote: > It's also very good easy to corrupt the testimony >-- have an eyewitness identify a suspect once and he is likely to start >reconstructing his memory along those lines. That's why, for example, the >people who identified Demjanjuk (sp?) as Ivan the Terrible, while sincere, >were likely wrong. Actually it would be nice to think that the "eyewitnesses" were sincere in the Demjanjuk case, however, I find it very doubtful. I point you to an excellent volume entitled, "The Demjanjuk Affair: The Rise and Fall of a Show Trial" by Yoram Sheftel (Gollancz - London 1994. Sheftel was Demjanjuk's lawyer. He is a wonderful standup fellow, a fervent Israeli nationalist. Sheftel suffered much harrassment for his defense of Demjanjuk including an acid attack. The contradictions of the eyewitnesses regarding "Ivan" throughout the years and the general conduct of this trial show that only through Sheftel's (and a few other brave individuals) intervention was an appalling miscarriage of justice averted. In regard to a broader question regarding "Ivan the terrible" and events at Treblinka, I point you to "Victim of the Holocaust" by Hans Peter Rullman (Ukrainian National Center) 1987. For an analysis of the plausibility of Diesel motors for mass extermination, I refer you to: http://www.valleynet.com/~brsmith/gcgv/diesel.html ******************************************************************* Richard Widmann C.O.D.O.H. http://www.valleynet.com/~brsmith/ ******************************************************************* From Widmann@gnn.com Sat Jun 29 07:30:29 PDT 1996 Article: 46641 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e2a.gnn.com!pop.gnn.com!Widmann From: Widmann@gnn.com (Richard Widmann) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: The Gas Chamber at Dachau Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1996 21:36:00 Organization: GNN Lines: 266 Message-ID: <4qvcje$iqr@news-e2b.gnn.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 71-126.client.gnn.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-GNN-NewsServer-Posting-Date: 28 Jun 1996 01:30:22 GMT X-Mailer: GNNmessenger 1.3 The story of the "gas chamber" at Dachau has resurfaced again (who speaks of a recurring thread here at wonderful alt.revisionism?) Anyway...here's Mr. Porter on the Dachau "chamber." THE GAS CHAMBER AT DACHAU: NOW YOU SEE IT, NOW YOU DON'T By Carlos W. Porter We are all familiar with an instrument called the kaleidoscope, in which loose bits of glass are reflected by plane mirrors showing each bit of glass in 6 places at once, creating the illusion of a symmetrical design. A similar phenomenon occurs in "War Crimes Trials," in which gas chambers are shown in 3 different places at once, and anywhere from 1 to 6 in number, creating the illusion of a Common Design (sometimes referred to as a Common Plan) for the extermination of human beings. An example of this illusion is the Gas Chamber at Dachau, which appeared in April of 1945, disappeared from Dachau by November of that year, only to reappear at Nuremberg in December,after which it disappeared from Nuremberg and only entered the scene again as "proven fact" in the trial of Oswald Pohl in 1947 (along with the steam chambers of Treblinka). The following is, I believe, a complete list of pretrial exhibits mentioning this "gas chamber", which was to be "proven" in the First Dachau Trial (trial of Martin Gottfried Weiss). The gas chamber accusation was dropped before trial. It is apparent that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers knew before November 15, 1945, that no gas chamber could function in the manner described, and that other stories of gas chambers functioning in a similar manner were not true. Yet a decision was made to continue this accusation in other trials for political reasons. (Microfilm pages 00005052): Report of the Atrocities Committed at Dachau Concentration Camp. Vol. 1. War Crimes Investigation Team No. 6823. Signed by David Chavez Jr. Colonel, JAGD, 7 May 1945. (Microfilm pages 0000713): Exhibit F photograph of gas panel. "S3 photograph of gas chamber V2 plan of water and gas installations V10 shower nozzle removed from gas chamber V11 label removed from cans (Zyklon) found in or near gas chamber Page 25 of "Chavez Report", 00089 of microfilm pages: "The new building had a gas chamber for executions... the gas chamber was labelled "shower room" over the entrance and was a large room with airtight doors and double glassed lights, sealed and gas proof. The ceiling was studded with dummy shower heads. A small observation peephole, double glassed and hermetically sealed was used to observe the conditions of the victims. There were grates in the floor. Hydrogen cyanide was mixed in the room below, and rose into the gas chamber and out the top vents. (Exhibit 34) Dr. Blaha witnessed the first test of the gas chamber in the new crematorium in early 1944, and examined the 7 victims used. Two were killed in the first test, an experiment to determine the amount of gas needed to kill a person (Exhibit 5). "Weight of general testimony shows that the gas chamber was developed successfully to get the desired results. Witness after witness mentions seeing living persons herded into the crematorium and never being seen again. When the chamber was not used it was because of the shortage of the materials to make the gas, the same reason for not using the crematorium continually, and certainly no change of heart on the part of the SS in charge. No witness can testify as an eye witness to an execution by gas except Dr. Blaha, because the crematorium and gas chamber was made up of condemned prisoners who lived in the crematorium yard and once in there, never left the area alive. Men picked for such duty knew that they were to be killed as persons too dangerous to the SS as possible future witnesses". (Col. Chavez testified at trial on November 15, 1945, and made no mention of any gas chamber. There is no mention of any gas chamber in the testimony of Col. Lawrence Ball, another government expert witness. There is no mention of any gas chamber in the prosecution opening statement, summation, or judgement. No mention in the defence summations. No mention in the testimony, except for a few sentences in the testimony of Dr. Blaha. Not one of the forty defendants was asked a single question concerning any gas chamber. Dr. Blaha testified twice. In his second appearance as witness during prosecution "rebuttal", he also makes no mention of any gas chamber. The Chavez report was rewritten and introduced into evidence at Nuremberg as "proven fact", even though it was known to be untrue. (Documents 159L, 2430PS). The existence of a gas chamber at Dachau was not upheld in the judgement at Nuremberg. Page 56 of this same report, the "Chavez Report" (000120 of the microfilm pages, reel 1, M1174, National Archives): "This new building also contained a gas chamber for execution... the gas chamber was labelled "shower room". The first test of a gas chamber was in 1944, when prisoners were used to determine the amount of gas required to kill a person". 000132: "(Diagrams) drawing of piping section above chamber, ventilator, galvanized piping, open into gas chamber. Insulated piping. Gas chamber... gas chamber. Dachau prison camp. 000133: "Grill covered inlets. Hinged door. Water (?) drains. Gas chamber. Dachau prison camp". 000134: "Vents. Ceiling. Gas Chamber. Dachau prison camp. Shower heads flush with ceiling". 000135: (Diagram) Gas Chamber. Gas tight doors. Wooden shed believed to contain pump or compressor (?). Piping system above chamber ceiling, dimensions of chamber 24' x 18' x 6'. Chamber constructed of smooth, paleyellow brick like refractory brick, with small cement joints. Elevation. Gas chamber. Dachau prison camp". PreTrial Witness Interrogations and Other Exhibits. 000199: "In February 1945, 65 Jewish children... arrived in the camp..; the children started crying and said: Please don't put us into the gas chamber. When we replied there was no such thing as a gas chamber, they said: oh yes, our parents told us that we were going into another camp and that we would be put into a gas chamber. We repeated there was no such thing, but they answered: oh yes, oh yes, our father or mother, or uncle or cousin, ... were put into the gas chamber because they were Jews. The children were kept in the camp for 2 or 3 weeks and were sent to the extermination camp in Auschwitz. Even old and hardened prisoners who had witnessed great inhuman treatment were deeply moved by the sight of the children". 000204: "There was no gas chamber in the camp in working order (!). A gas chamber was being built in the crematorium and in January 1945, work was going on at a high speed. The chamber was soon completed except for the gas boiler (?). A railway worker who had to go in and out of the camp told me that a boiler had arrived at the Ostbanhof, Munich, from Auschwitz. But this boiler, together with many gas cylinders had been destroyed in an air raid. 000212: "The years 1940/43 seem to have been the worst period in Dachau and other similar camps. I was told by eyewitnesses of the mass extermination of Jews who were sent in a gas chamber 500 at a time..." report on Prison Camp conditions dictated by Captain P.M. Martinot, 23 May, 1945. 000248: "Another specific provision was for a crematorium of four ovens and one gas chamber (called "desinfection chamber") (!). I do not know whether this camp was ever built". 000250: "The most important building projects which were planned and executed during my presence were as follows:... one crematorium called "Barracke X" in the concentration camp at Dachau, containing six individual gas chambers (!) and 2 combustion ovens". 000277: "The Polish priests were compelled to build the well-known crematory and gas chambers (plural)... they were dragged by their legs to the chambers of death..." 000379: "Source said he visited a building that was designated as a shower room, but which in reality was a gas chamber". 000417: "The following Signal Corps photos are contained in 1222614 and have been retained in the War Crimes Office in Washington D.C. Gas Chambers (plural)". 000420: Photo of soldier in front of door reading "Gaszeit: (illegible) Vorsicht! Gas! Lebensgefahr! Nicht `ffnen!... Dachau Atrocity Camp: Gas Chambers (plural), conveniently located to the crematory, are examined by a 7th Army soldier. These are part of the horror chambers used by the Nazis before the 7th Army liberated the camp. 000445: "The following Signal Corps photos are contained in 12226 and have been retained in the War Crimes Office in Washington D.C.... (Gas Chamber)" (singular). 000455: "Photo... Yank examines fake showerhead in the gas chamber (singular) at the Dachau Concentration Camp. Located in the crematory, unknowing prisoners were brought into the shower room marked "showers". here they were stripped and after the door was closed, they were gassed". 000485: "Here also, there were gas chambers (plural) camouflaged as "showers" into which prisoners were herded under the pretext of bathing and the huge crematory ovens". 000486: "Inside as well as outside (?) were gas chambers (plural) with adjacent crematory ovens... almost 100 naked bodies were stacked neatly in the barren room with cement floors. They had come from a room on the left marked "Brausehad" for "shower bath". It really was a gas chamber (singular) a low ceilinged room about 30 feet square. After 15 or 20 were inside, the doors were firmly sealed and the faucets turned on and poison gas issued (!). Then the bodies were hauled into a room separating the gas chamber from the crematorium. There were four huge ovens with a huge flue leading to a smokeblackened stack". 000489: "The troops also discovered gas chambers, torture chambers and ovens". 000496: "We saw the original gas chambers, four huge cells (!) into which victims apparently were crowded and put to death. Later on this method was improved by construction of a large chamber with a jet in the ceiling, similar to showerbath sprinklers. The prisoners undressed in a room, where a man sat, with flowers on his desk, who gave them soap and a towel. Herded into the shower room, the gas was turned on while the operator watched its effect through a telescopic peephole". 000497: "Gas chamber executions". 000506: "Here one can see for oneself the lethal chamber where the people the Nazis doomed were gassed. It has imitation shower baths, installations with dummy sprinklers set in a pipeless ceiling (!), and gratings looking like water drains in the floor through which gas was sent" (So did it come through the floor or through the ceiling?). 000508: "Shower rooms' (plural again) where gas was poured (!) into chambers. 000509: "Jarolin (deputy camp commander at Dachau, defendant in Trial of Martin Gottfried Weiss)... said he thought they had gone to the gas chamber". 000513: "Gas chamber deaths at Belsen. It was admitted by the prosecution that many inmates were mentally ill, had lost their minds, or were wandering around in a mental daze, yet their statements were accepted as "fact", no matter how contradictory. It was also admitted that Dachau had 6 hospitals and that 15,000 people died of disease in the last few months, and that emaciation is a symptom of dysentery. Defendants were convicted of "aiding and abetting in a common design", even if no accusations were made against them by inmates (case of Gretsch and Schoepp). ******************************************************************* Richard Widmann C.O.D.O.H. http://www.valleynet.com/~brsmith/ ******************************************************************* From Widmann@gnn.com Sat Jun 29 15:46:21 PDT 1996 Article: 46788 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!news.emf.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e2a.gnn.com!pop.gnn.com!Widmann From: Widmann@gnn.com (Richard Widmann) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: Where smoke and flame stories come from Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 20:53:26 Organization: GNN Lines: 30 Message-ID: <4qncur$lso@news-e2b.gnn.com> References: <4pq44f$2o8@sjx-ixn5.ix.netcom.com> <4qi4o6$5eb@dfw-ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> <4qk9hn$cbn@news-e2c.gnn.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 29-19.client.gnn.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-GNN-NewsServer-Posting-Date: 25 Jun 1996 00:47:23 GMT X-Mailer: GNNmessenger 1.3 In article Daniel Keren wrote: >The "revisionist argument" was summed up by one of the >"revisionists" who was honest enough: > > Mr. Keren, your hatred has blinded you. Your stereotyping and group-association is what I would have hoped that you stood most strongly against. To condemn all revisionists because Milton Kleim is a Neo-Nazi is ludicrous. It is this type of group-think and bigotry that allowed Nazism to occur in the first place. You need to step back and make sure that you are not becoming that which you most despise. Why not ask Mr. Garaudy if he too is a Nazi? This argument is the old and tired one which has no real viability on alt.revisionism. This is not part of a discussion of revisionism. It is old fashioned name-calling. Can you discuss revisionism and ideas without using the word Nazi? I wonder. ******************************************************************* Richard Widmann C.O.D.O.H. http://www.valleynet.com/~brsmith/ ******************************************************************* From Widmann@gnn.com Sun Jun 30 09:33:23 PDT 1996 Article: 46900 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!op.net!fury.berkshire.net!news.albany.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-10.sprintlink.net!tezcat.com!netaxs.com!panix!news.denver.eti.net!imci5!pull-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e2a.gnn.com!pop.gnn.com!Widmann From: Widmann@gnn.com (Richard Widmann) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Tales of the Red Army Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 20:54:44 Organization: GNN Lines: 30 Message-ID: <4qnd18$lth@news-e2b.gnn.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 29-19.client.gnn.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-GNN-NewsServer-Posting-Date: 25 Jun 1996 00:48:40 GMT X-Mailer: GNNmessenger 1.3 ANOTHER TALE OF THE RED ARMY- The Germans are not human beings. Henceforth the word German means to us the most terrible curse. From now on the word German will trigger your rifle. We shall not speak any moe. We shall not get excited. We shall kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day... If you cannot kill your German with a bullet, kil him with your bayonet. If there is calm on your part of the front, if you are waiting for the fighting, kill a German before combat. If you leave a German alive, the German will hang a Russian and rape a Russian woman. If you kill one German, kill another - there is nothing more amusing for us than a heap of German corpses. Do not count days; do not count miles. Count only the number of Germans you have killed. Kill the German - this is your old mother's prayer. Kill ther German - this is what your children beseech you to do. Kill the German - this is the cry of your Russian earth. Do not waver. Do not let up. Kill. (Text is found in Ilya Ehrenburg's book Vojna (The war) (Moscow, 1942-43) ******************************************************************* Richard Widmann C.O.D.O.H. http://www.valleynet.com/~brsmith/ ******************************************************************* From Widmann@gnn.com Sun Jun 30 09:33:24 PDT 1996 Article: 46938 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!op.net!fury.berkshire.net!news.albany.net!news.sover.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e2a.gnn.com!pop.gnn.com!Widmann From: Widmann@gnn.com (Richard Widmann) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: THE DIESEL EXHAUST CONTROVERSY Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 21:14:00 Organization: GNN Lines: 29 Message-ID: <4qne5c$mb9@news-e2b.gnn.com> References: <4qjugd$el5@news-e2b.gnn.com> <4qkl9v$lte@Networking.Stanford.EDU> NNTP-Posting-Host: 29-19.client.gnn.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-GNN-NewsServer-Posting-Date: 25 Jun 1996 01:07:56 GMT X-Mailer: GNNmessenger 1.3 In article <4qkl9v$lte@Networking.Stanford.EDU> Rich Graves wrote: >I'm sure the fact that diesel exhaust cannot kill people will come as a >great comfort to the families and friends of a Redwood City teenager who >was reported to have committed suicide by sitting in a running car in a >closed garage. Mr. Graves - you really must slow down a bit. Surely you did not read my post or I can not see why you would make the comment that you have made. First, I have reproduced a line from the article that I posted that stated CLEARLY: " Although carbon monoxide levels in Diesel exhaust CAN KILL under heavy engine loads (Buchanan is mistaken in this regard), such conditions are quite difficult to achieve. See the article Diesel Gas Chambers: Myth Within A Myth." (Note: I have added the emphasis this time.) ******************************************************************* Richard Widmann C.O.D.O.H. http://www.valleynet.com/~brsmith/ ******************************************************************* From Widmann@gnn.com Sun Jun 30 09:33:24 PDT 1996 Article: 46953 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!op.net!inter2.interstice.com!news2.cais.net!news.cais.net!news1.erols.com!hunter.premier.net!netnews.worldnet.att.net!uunet!inXS.uu.net!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e2a.gnn.com!pop.gnn.com!Widmann From: Widmann@gnn.com (Richard Widmann) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: SOVIET PLANS TO INVADE GERMANY Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 21:06:55 Organization: GNN Lines: 43 Message-ID: <4qndo6$m6m@news-e2b.gnn.com> References: <4qjohc$74b@news-e2c.gnn.com> <4qkkqr$lrm@Networking.Stanford.EDU> NNTP-Posting-Host: 29-19.client.gnn.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-GNN-NewsServer-Posting-Date: 25 Jun 1996 01:00:54 GMT X-Mailer: GNNmessenger 1.3 In article <4qkkqr$lrm@Networking.Stanford.EDU> Rich Graves wrote: >>According to Carell, "The secret documents of the Soviet High >>Command" reveal that "the long-accepted view of ...a peace-loving >>Soviet Union, organized only for defense, was attacked without >>cause by Germany, can no longer be supported." > >Gee, I wonder what those ellipses represent? The passage in its entirety: "the long-accepted view of the German-Soviet war, that on June 22, 1941, a peace-loving Soviet Union, organized only for defense, was attacked without cause by Germany, can no longer be supported." > >"Peace-loving Soviet Union"? These are the words of Mr. Paul Carell - His volume is available >from Schiffer Military History. Available in any good bookstore. Carell is one of the leading Military authors of our time. What have you been smoking? They invaded >Poland along with Nazi Germany, and were later stabbed in the back >by their former ally. It is exactly that point, "stabbed in the back" which has been refuted. Please reread my post, or better yet check out Carell's volume. Carell shows that Germany attacked WITH cause. > >How easy it must be to debunk a myth that never existed. You may find "the myth that never existed" in many historical volumes. The widest read and most popular being, William Shirer's old classic, "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich." ******************************************************************* Richard Widmann C.O.D.O.H. http://www.valleynet.com/~brsmith/ ******************************************************************* From Widmann@gnn.com Sun Jun 30 09:33:25 PDT 1996 Article: 47012 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!news.emf.net!news.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e2a.gnn.com!pop.gnn.com!Widmann From: Widmann@gnn.com (Richard Widmann) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: Where smoke and flame stories come from Date: Tue, 25 Jun 1996 07:10:39 Organization: GNN Lines: 46 Message-ID: <4qoh46$m66@news-e2d.gnn.com> References: <4pq44f$2o8@sjx-ixn5.ix.netcom.com> <4qi4o6$5eb@dfw-ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> <4qk9hn$cbn@news-e2c.gnn.com> <4qncur$lso@news-e2b.gnn.com> <4qntjc$nk@atlas.uniserve.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 47-54.client.gnn.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-GNN-NewsServer-Posting-Date: 25 Jun 1996 11:04:38 GMT X-Mailer: GNNmessenger 1.3 In article <4qntjc$nk@atlas.uniserve.com> Hilary Ostrov wrote: >Perhaps the one who needs to step back is not Dr. Keren, but yourself. >After all, he made _no_ accusations, did _not_ engage in stereotyping >_nor_ in "group association". > First let me say, that I was not aware that Mr. Keren, had achieved his Phd. Congratulations! Ms. Ostrov, a reread of my comments in regard to Dr. Keren's will show (I believe) that Keren has "summed up the revisionist argument" by posting the words of one Milton Kleim. Revisionists do NOT hold the same views. Surely you have come to this conclusion by now. Revisionism is a loose term which connects numerous people who hold very strong, albeit individual views of what when on during the second world war (and other historical events.) To categorize all revisionists because of the words and thoughts of Milton Kleim is absurd. It is the equivalent of saying that all authors of the "traditional holocaust" story believe the same thing, are of the same political persuasion etc. Surely you do not believe this. If you were to discover the politics of various revisionists, you would find them to be as varied as with any other group of people. That certain neo-nazis hold some "revisionist" views is our misfortune. Revisionists actually hold many varied views even on those things which you might believe they would all agree. Dr. Faurisson for example has had very strong arguments with David Irving, Fritz Berg, and David Cole (and probably others.) In David Irving's latest volume, "Goebbels" he refutes Ingrid Weckert's theories regarding Krystallnacht. At various times, Cole has been very critical of Leuchter. I could go on and on. Revisionism is a label. It has as much and as little value as just about any other label. Classical music is a label as well. Listen closely and you will find many different ideas. ******************************************************************* Richard Widmann C.O.D.O.H. http://www.valleynet.com/~brsmith/ *******************************************************************
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.