The Nizkor Project: Remembering the Holocaust (Shoah)

Shofar FTP Archive File: people/w/warner.mike/1997/warner.0197


From rhino@mbay.net Sat Jan 11 18:35:28 PST 1997
Article: 92343 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!noc.van.hookup.net!laslo.netnet.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-5.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-pull.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!worldnet.att.net!feed1.news.erols.com!news.enteract.com!news.he.net!news.mbay.net!not-for-mail
From: rhino@mbay.net (Titan White)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.black,alt.revisionism
Subject: I'm a Jew and I'm not "x"
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 22:05:44 GMT
Organization: Monterey Bay Internet, Monterey, CA
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <32dfbd34.5921435@news.mbay.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dip-28.mtry.mbay.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99g/32.339
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:43131 alt.politics.white-power:55476 alt.revisionism:92343

The Jews are like any other people insofar as they don't have 100%
coherency among their ranks. So when a Jew pipes up with

    I'm a Jew, and I'm not [].

it's beside the point. When countries go to war, it's not because the
government of [1] has a grievance against each and every citizen of
[2]. Of course not.

However, if a group's members do no proactively concern themselves
with the direction the group is being led by its leaders, then at some
point each and every member will be made to suffer the effects of that
direction and be accountable for the actions of its leadership.

Although I am not a National Socialist, nor a Nazi--neo or otherwise--
I believe that the blanket reprisal Jews suffered at the hands of
Germany in World War 2 is due to the fact that, when push came to
shove, the group suffered for the cumulative conduct of its Pharisees.

And it will continue to be so.

If Jews do not want to suffer a fate similar to their forbears (and
they have, without exception, pissed-off every nation that's ever
hosted them), then they'd best take a proactive interest in where they
are being led by their Pharisees. For in the end, it won't be an
excuse that they didn't.

titan




From rhino@mbay.net Mon Jan 13 16:27:05 PST 1997
Article: 92697 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.InterGate.BC.CA!n1van.istar!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!nntp.portal.ca!news.bc.net!arclight.uoregon.edu!newsfeeds.sol.net!uwm.edu!news.he.net!news.mbay.net!not-for-mail
From: rhino@mbay.net (Titan White)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.black,alt.revisionism
Subject: The Crime of Tolerance
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 22:18:29 GMT
Organization: Monterey Bay Internet, Monterey, CA
Lines: 153
Message-ID: <32e4bf8c.6520818@news.mbay.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dip-28.mtry.mbay.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99g/32.339
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:43378 alt.politics.white-power:55676 alt.revisionism:92697

This piece appeared in a quarterly journal published anonymously by a
group of political philosophers and professional soldiers. The quality
of the thinking and writing eclipses, and sometimes surpasses, that of
Hamilton, Madison and Jay writing as the anonyomous Publius in The
Federalist Papers. It is a trillion-candela beacon in a mainly
degenerative intellectual landscape. Witness History being made.

I am in no way connected with *The Resister*. They know me not. The
editors request that all fair use extracts be accompanied by
subscription information. 

************************************************************************************

The Resistor
The Political Warfare Journal of the Special Forces Underground

Volume III, Numbers 1&2
Published Quarterly by the
John P. Zenger Press
Summer & Fall 1996

The Virtue of Intolerance
    by Melancton Smith

   Although we are growing a little weary of the incessant attempts by
tribalist pressure groups and extortion rackets to label *The
Resister* as "racist" and "extremist;" yet so long as those groups
persist, (groups whose sole purpose is to implement fully
nondiscriminatory egalitarianism--which by definition demands the
abandonment of all objective standards of value) we will continue to
expose their agenda for what it is: the desire to destroy the good
*because* it is good. The specific method employed by these gangs is
an appeal to "tolerance" for "others." The "others" referred to in all
cases are, of course, themselves. Their specific demands, in the name
of "tolerance," are the silencing of any discourse on the immorality
of their ideas, the suspension of any judgment on the consequences of
their ideas--their actions, and the criminalization of any
discrimination against them (in other words, freedom of thought and
freedom of association.)
   In the vocabulary of tribalist-collectivists "tolerance" means
surrender to and acceptance of any whim-based act or wish-based demand
that advances their goal of standardless, valueless egalitarianism. In
short, their demand for "tolerance" is nothing less than a demand for
moral and ethical agnosticism; a demand that no judgment--no
distinction--ever be drawn between good and evil.
   "Tolerance" is yet another anti-concept that tribalists and
collectivists demand be accepted without question. As an anti-concept
the word "tolerance" evokes an emotional response, not reasoned
thought. "Tolerance" demands that primitive behavior be as equally
accepted as civilized behavior. It demands that immoral behavior be as
equally accepted as moral behavior, that lies be as equally valid as
truth, and that irrationality be as equally regarded as reason. In
other words, "tolerance" means nothing less than endangering that
which is good for the sake of that which is evil in the name of "hope"
for "understanding." The undefined sub-categories of "tolerance"
include the terms "diversity," which means compromise, and
"inclusive," which means standardless. "Tolerance" therefore is
nothing more than a feel-good term for *appeasement*.
   The *decretum*: "Judge not, that ye be not judgedÖ" is a baseless
demand that man abandon all standards of value and morality and
surrender his mind to the first mystic or whim worshipper who whines
"who are you to judge?" That appeal contends that there is nothing to
know, there is no reality, and therefore there are no absolutes to
which an individual must adhere. It means the abandonment of
principles, upon which individual judgment is based, and the
renouncement of standards against which principled judgment is gauged.
   No rational man should ever hesitate to pass moral jodgment on the
irrational, the immoral or the evil. A rational man has a
responsibility to himself, in respect for himself and the truth, to
champion the rational, the moral and the good. All issues have exactly
two sides: one is the truth and the other is a lie. Any compromise of
the truth, any middle ground, any appeasement of untruth is an
unspeakable evil. The man who adheres to a lie may still have some
respect for the truth if he accepts responsibility for his choice.
However, a man who compromises the truth to seek a "consensus," or
abdicates the truth to find a "middle ground," a compromise, or to
appease, is a coward and a blackguard who shuts out the truth in order
to pretend that he has no choice in the matter and that no values
exist.
   Advocates of "tolerance" are mystics who contend that the subject
requiring "tolerance" must be forgiven anything and that morality can
be dismissed completely if only we have enough love and understanding
for the criminal or the depraved. Some broad examples. When Mexican
peasants swarm across our Southern border, demanding the "right" to be
parasites, and then further demand that Spanish be as equally
recognized as the English language, they are demanding that their
criminal presence, the redistribution of wealth they could not
conceive of creating themselves, and their degradation of a language
they refuse to learn, be regarded with "tolerance." When street
savages riot, loot and burn their own neighborhoods we must "tolerate"
their savagery *because* they behave like savages. Homosexuals must be
"tolerated" *because* they are sexual perverts. Feminist demands for
undeserved egalitarianism must be "tolerated" *because* they cannot
demonstrate equal merit.
   In each of the above examples "tolerance" means the appeasement of
criminality, savagery, perversion and meritlessness for no other
purpose than the destruction of the regard for law, civilization, and
objective standards of morality. A failure to pass objective moral
judgment on subjective immoral actions, statements and beliefs is a
surrender to immorality, lies and irrationality.
   A concrete example. If, in a briefing, you catch your commander
lying you have a moral responsibility to *yourself* to interject,
"That is not true." How many commissioned and non-commissioned
officers would lie, cheat and steal, or tolerate those who do, if they
knew that among them there were those who would not tolerate such
behavior, and who would make it public when it was discovered?
   "Tolerance" is not a virtue. It is a surrender of virtue; a
compromise of integrity, a moral appeasement to the willfully evil.
"Tolerance" is an abandonment of philosophical principle in favor of
psychological mysticism.
   The *decretum*: "Judge not, that ye be not judgedÖ" is an
unconscionable submission to compromise and appeasement. Our
*decretum* is: "We judge, and are prepared to be judged."
   *Intolerance* of irrationality, compromise and appeasement is
unquestionably virtuous.
END

*********************************************************************************

Subscription Info:

Boxholder
po box 47095
Kansas City, Missouri
64188
usa
US $25.00, foreign $30.00
single issue $7.00

Statement of [Resisterís] Policy:
   The philosophy of The Resister is straightforward. Individual
rights, strict constitutionalism, limited government, American
self-interest, laissez-faire capitalism, and republicanism; in short,
the principles upon which this nation was founded.
   We oppose: statism, socialism, collectivism, racism, altruism,
internationalism, tribalism, unlimited democracy, pull politics, and
the "New World Order;" in short, the ideologies of all tyrannies.
   Our philosophical framework is Objectivism* (the rational morality
of self-interest--Life). Our political philosophy is grounded in the
works of the Framers of the Constitution (government as servant, not
master--Liberty). Our economic philosophy is laissez-faire capitalism
(the origin of true rights--Property). 
   We do not advocate the overthrow of the U.S. government. We do
advocate resistance to government tyranny. We do not advocate the
initiation of force in doing so. We do advocate appropriate
force-in-kind retaliation. We advocate resistance against the United
Nations. Our goal is the restoration of the Constitutional Republic
and to see government chained to the walls of its constitutional
prison. 
   *The editors of this publication accept Objectivism as their
philosophical base; however, we are not spokesmen for Objectivism and
we alone are responsible for the views expressed here. 



From rhino@mbay.net Tue Jan 14 10:30:52 PST 1997
Article: 131993 of alt.conspiracy
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!noc.van.hookup.net!news.bctel.net!news.InterGate.BC.CA!n1van.istar!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!nntp.portal.ca!news.bc.net!arclight.uoregon.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!news.dra.com!news.exodus.net!news.mbay.net!not-for-mail
From: rhino@mbay.net (Titan White)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
Subject: Toward an understanding of the Jewish ADL
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 08:27:55 GMT
Organization: Monterey Bay Internet, Monterey, CA
Lines: 180
Message-ID: <32daf1fb.2257982@news.mbay.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dip-14.mtry.mbay.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99g/32.339

To all,

This piece appeared in a quarterly journal published anonymously by a
group of political philosophers and professional soldiers. The quality
of the thinking and writing eclipses, and sometimes surpasses, that of
Hamilton, Madison and Jay writing as the anonymous "Publius" in The
Federalist Papers. Witness History being made.

I am in no way connected with *The Resister*. They know me not. The
editors request that all fair use extracts be accompanied by
subscription information. 

The Resistor
The Political Warfare Journal of the Special Forces Underground

Volume III, Numbers 1&2
Published Quarterly by the
John P. Zenger Press
Summer & Fall 1996

The Cheka
     by J.F.A Davidson

   America was rocked in 1943 by the publication of *Undercover* by
John Roy Carlson. Carlsonís book documented his three years as an
undercover operative and informer in what he described as the Nazi
underground in America. Prominent American patriots, America First
advocates, anti-New Deal spokesmen, and their publications,
associations, and supporters were implicated as being part of a
nationwide anti-Semitic fascist conspiracy. Lives and reputations were
smeared and ruined. Communists redoubled their recruiting campaigns.
Roosevelt became more bold in his protection of communists in his
cabinet; internationalists jumped up and down yelling "We told you
so!" and the terms patriotism and isolationism, already under attack,
were converted, overnight, into anti-concepts. The problem was, the
information revealed in *Undercover* was a deliberate, calculated
*lie*.
   John Roy Carlsonís real name was Avedis Boghos Derounian. He was an
Armenian Communist in the employ of the Anti-Defamation League of
Bínai Bírith. He was subsequently sued--and convicted--for libel by
several people whom he defamed in *Undercover*, which was referred to
as "500 pages of twaddle--mere twaddle," by Judge Barnes of the
federal court in Chicago. But the damage to the innocents Derounian
smeared in *Undercover* had already been done; all in the name of the
ADL. What motive did the ADL have for smearing patriotic Americans who
opposed the blatantly socialist New Deal and Americaís senseless entry
into the Second World War? The simple reason, the *only* reason, was
that the libeled patriots were *anti-Communists*. The ADL considered
then, and still considers, anti-Communism to be an unpardonable
"crime."
   Since the 1930s the ADL has systematically defamed, libeled, and
smeared anybody who gained public prominence as an anti-Communist.
When ADL spokesmen scream "anti-Semite," or "racist" or "fascist," or
"white Christian male" what they really mean is that their target of
defamation has spoken out against subjective "laws" and government
policies that advance socialism in America.
   The ADL, consistent with their socialist and totalitarian agenda,
are advocates and lobbyists for any arbitrary subjective "law" or
government policy that is intended to strangle individual liberty or
eliminate individual choice. In 1946 the ADL was the moving force
behind an obscene New York state program, the Fair Employment
Practices Commission (FEPC), which required employers to hire and
promote employees according to the whims of a state appointed board
that had the power to fine or imprison any employer that did not
accede to the FEPCís arbitrary choices of employees, or promotions, in
*private* business. As a logical adjunct to the ADL offered "model
legislation" that would have made any derogatory reference to a Jew a
*federal criminal offense*! The Communist Party USA championed that
proposed "model legislation" tirelessly, for the sole reason that all
a Communist had to do was declare himself a Jew to avoid any
litigation for his treasonous activities. But then, that was the
explicit purpose behind ADLís "model legislation"--which was taken
verbatim from existing "laws" in Stalinís Soviet Union. Today, that is
the explicit purpose behind the ADLís "model legislation" on so-called
hate crimes.
   The ADL maintains the largest private (and *illegal*) domestic
intelligence apparatus in the United States. Its snitches, informants
and undercover operatives target any organization or individual who
espouses constitutionalism, a return to objective law, patriotism,
American self-interest, or anti-socialism. The ADL functions, for all
intents and purposes, as the intelligence service of the Communist
Party USA.
   This criminal enterprise is geared to silence any opposition to
ADLís communist agenda through blackmail, coercion, libel, extortion,
and legal terrorism. All the ADL has to do is mumble the mystic
incantation, "anti-Semitism," to coerce publishers into not publishing
books or magazines the ADL finds offensive, TV producers to cancel
shows the ADL does not want shown, spin the news to the ADLís slant,
or pressure sponsors to cancel lectures by people the ADL does not
approve of. The ADL accomplishes this by threatening individuals with
adverse publicity (blackmail) or protracted and costly lawsuits (legal
terrorism) if they are not cooperative. The ADLís payoff for these
extortionary practices is perceived public legitimacy for whatever
contemptible drivel and blatant lies they are shopping at the time.
   A careful examination of the programs, policies and "legislation"
the ADL supports reveal them to be incremental steps on the path to
socialist totalitarianism. There has not been a single whim-based gun
control, censorship, anti-capitalism, anti-property or anti-freedom of
association "law" passed since the 1930s that the ADL has not
sponsored or publically supported--or that the Communist Party USA has
opposed.
   To bring this fact into immediate focus we refer our readers to the
anti-paramilitary training "laws" enacted in 24 states since the
1980s. The base document upon which these "laws" were crafted was
written by the ADL and shopped out to statesí legislators for the
ostensible purpose of combatting "hate." According to the ADL, "hate"
defines any organization or any person who opposes their, or their
allyís, Communist agenda.
   "ADL urges the vigorous enforcement by the states of existing
statutes outlawing specific types of paramilitary training" said a
recent ADL press release. "Many of these measures, currently on the
books of 24 states," it continues, "were patterned after a model bill
formulated by ADL. The League has written to the governors of the
remaining 26 states, urging them to work with their legislatures to
adopt such statutes."
   By what right does a private partisan organization "formulate"
legislation specifically designed to abrogate the unalienable right of
individual citizens in a constitutional republic to drill as a "well
regulated militia" in self-defense against tyranny? By what criteria
do "representatives" enact such legislation?
   The answers to these questions are simple. The ADL arrogated to
*themselves* the extralegal authority to "formulate"
anti-constitutional legislation, and leftist legislators legitimized
the ADLís usurpation of the legislative process by acceding to the
ADLís tribalist-collectivist whims.
   The ADLís expressed long range goal is to make "hate" a federal
crime. This is nothing less than an open declaration advocating
*thought crime*. In no other country in the world--including
Israel--have jews, on the whole, experienced the freedom and liberty
inherent in America. In no other country in the world has the ADL
exerted so much time, effort, money and propaganda to effect
totalitarianism and establish themselves--through that obscenity, the
Justice Departmentís Civil Rights division--as Americaís Thought
Cheka.
   From 1917, until its alleged collapse, the ADL held the *Soviet
Union* to be the model of "tolerance and freedom for Jews." In
November 1946, ADL spokesman Louis Levine, writing in *Soviet Russia
Today* stated, "One does not *dare* to be anti-Semitic in Russia."
[Original emphasis.] The ADLís sister organization in the Soviet
Union, the Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee, made certain the gulags were
filled to capacity to drive home the point.
   Now, ask yourself: "Why does the ADL support gun control and
promise anti-militia legislation?"
   Better yet, ask a prisoner in a Russian gulag.
END

Subscription Info:

Boxholder
po box 47095
Kansas City, Missouri
64188
usa
US $25.00, foreign $30.00
single issue $7.00

Statement of [Resisterís] Policy:
   The philosophy of The Resister is straightforward. Individual
rights, strict constitutionalism, limited government, American
self-interest, laissez-faire capitalism, and republicanism; in short,
the principles upon which this nation was founded.
   We oppose: statism, socialism, collectivism, racism, altruism,
internationalism, tribalism, unlimited democracy, pull politics, and
the "New World Order;" in short, the ideologies of all tyrannies.
   Our philosophical framework is Objectivism* (the rational morality
of self-interest--Life). Our political philosophy is grounded in the
works of the Framers of the Constitution (government as servant, not
master--Liberty). Our economic philosophy is laissez-faire capitalism
(the origin of true rights--Property). 
   We do not advocate the overthrow of the U.S. government. We do
advocate resistance to government tyranny. We do not advocate the
initiation of force in doing so. We do advocate appropriate
force-in-kind retaliation. We advocate resistance against the United
Nations. Our goal is the restoration of the Constitutional Republic
and to see government chained to the walls of its constitutional
prison. 
   *The editors of this publication accept Objectivism as their
philosophical base; however, we are not spokesmen for Objectivism and
we alone are responsible for the views expressed here. 



From rhino@mbay.net Wed Jan 15 13:55:51 PST 1997
Article: 55873 of alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.InterGate.BC.CA!n1van.istar!van.istar!west.istar!ott.istar!istar.net!n3ott.istar!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!worldnet.att.net!news.dra.com!news.exodus.net!news.mbay.net!not-for-mail
From: rhino@mbay.net (Titan White)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Subject: Re: What precisely defines an Aryan
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 12:25:26 GMT
Organization: Monterey Bay Internet, Monterey, CA
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <32f029b1.16521946@news.mbay.net>
References: <5bb4k8$41f@tor-nn1-hb0.netcom.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dip-14.mtry.mbay.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99g/32.339
X-No-Archive: yes

heicz@netcom.ca(Henry Robert Heiczereder) wrote:

>What physical characteristics does one need in order to be defined an
>'Aryan?'  Are Aryan's blond, and blue eyed and that's it?  
>
>Henry
>
>    heicz@netcom.ca

Aryans are peoples speaking Indo-European language dialects. Insofar
as language encapsulates a people's cognitive space, it is
determinative and expressive of culture. Aryans can be of many races.
One of the challenges facing archeologists and philologists is the
problem of the geographic origins of the proto-Aryans--the progenitors
of this diffuse set of peoples sharing identifiable, distinct cultural
attributes. The proto-Aryans were of a certain race, of course, and
experts are agreed that they were Caucasians come out of either
Scandinavia or Southern Russia.

It gets very interesting, especially when archaeologists begin
speaking of the "long-skulls" and the "blunt-skulls"--both of whom
might have been members of the same race.

See

  The Aryans
  V. Gordon Childe
  Barnes and Noble, 1993

titan




Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor

© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012

This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and to combat hatred. Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.

As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.