From rsavage@netcom.com Wed Aug  2 18:38:42 PDT 1995
Article: 7203 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!news.bc.net!info.ucla.edu!news.ucdavis.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: What is Racism?
Message-ID: 
Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 1995 16:57:16 GMT
Lines: 274
Sender: rsavage@netcom20.netcom.com

---------------------------------------
Get the "Identity.faq" and many other files by
anonymous FTP from:    ftp.netcom.com /pub/SF/SFA
-------------------------------------------------


                          WHAT IS RACISM?                        
                         by Thomas Jackson
   {Originally Published in American Renaissance, Vol 2, No. 8}

     There is surely no nation in the world that holds "racism"
in greater horror than does the United States. Compared to other
kinds of offenses, it is thought to be somehow more
reprehensible. The press and public have become so used to tales
of murder, rape, robbery, and arson, that any but the most
spectacular crimes are shrugged off as part of the inevitable
texture of American life. "Racism" is never shrugged off.        
For example, when a white Georgetown Law School student reported
earlier this year that black students are not as qualified as
white students, it set off a booming, national controversy about
"racism." If the student had merely murdered someone he would
have attracted far less attention and criticism.
     Racism is, indeed, the national obsession. Universities
are on full alert for it, newspapers and politicians denounce it,
churches preach against it, America is said to be racked with it,
but just what *is* racism?
     Dictionaries are not much help in understanding what is
meant by the word. They usually define it as the belief that
one's own ethnic stock is superior to others, or as the belief
that culture and behavior are rooted in race. When Americans
speak of racism they mean a great deal more than this.        
Nevertheless, the dictionary definition of racism is a clue to
understanding what Americans *do* mean. A peculiarly American
meaning derives from the current dogma that all ethnic stocks are
equal. Despite clear evidence to the contrary, all races have
been declared to be equally talented and hard- working, and
anyone who questions the dogma is thought to be not merely wrong
but evil.
     The dogma has logical consequences that are profoundly
important. If blacks, for example, are equal to whites in every
way, what accounts for their poverty, criminality, and
dissipation? Since any theory of racial differences has been
outlawed, the only possible explanation for black failure is
white racism. And since blacks are markedly poor, crime-prone,
and dissipated, America must be racked with pervasive racism.
Nothing else could be keeping them in such an abject state.      
     All public discourse on race today is locked into this rigid
logic. Any explanation for black failure that does not depend on
white wickedness threatens to veer off into the forbidden
territory of racial differences. Thus, even if today's whites can
find in their hearts no desire to oppress blacks, yesterday's
whites must have oppressed them. If whites do not consciously
oppress blacks, they must oppress them UNconsciously. If no
obviously racist individuals can be identified, then
*institutions* must be racist. Or, since blacks are failing so
terribly in America, there simply must be millions of white
people we do not know about, who are working day and night to
keep blacks in misery. The dogma of racial equality leaves no
room for an explanation of black failure that is not, in some
fashion, an indictment of white people.
    The logical consequences of this are clear. Since we are
required to believe that the only explanation for non-white
failure is white racism, every time a non-white is poor, commits
a crime, goes on welfare, or takes drugs, white society stands
accused of yet another act of racism. All failure or misbehavior
by non-whites is standing proof that white society is riddled
with hatred and bigotry. For precisely so long as non-whites fail
to succeed in life at exactly the same level as whites, whites
will be, by definition, thwarting and oppressing them. This
obligatory pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions.
First of all, racism is a sin that is thought to be committed
almost exclusively by white people. Indeed, a black congressman
>from  Chicago, Gus Savage, and Coleman Young, the black mayor of
Detroit, have argued that only white people *can* be racist.
Likewise, in 1987, the affirmative action officer of the State
Insurance Fund of New York issued a company pamphlet in which
she explained that *all* whites are racist and that *only* whites
can be racist. How else could the plight of blacks be explained
without flirting with the possibility of racial inequality?      
     Although some blacks and liberal whites concede that non-whites
can, perhaps, be racist, they invariably add that non-whites have
been forced into it as self-defense because of centuries of white
oppression. What appears to be non-white racism is so
understandable and forgivable that it hardly deserves the name.
Thus, whether or not an act is called racism depends on the race
of the racist. What would surely be called racism when done by
whites is thought to be normal when done by anyone else. The
reverse is also true.
     Examples of this sort of double standard are so common,
it is almost tedious to list them: When a white man kills a black
man and uses the word "nigger" while doing so, there is an 
enormous media uproar and the nation beats its collective breast;
when members of the black Yahweh cult carry out ritual murders of
random whites, the media are silent (see AR of March, 1991).
College campuses forbid pejorative statements about non-whites as
"racist," but ignore scurrilous attacks on whites.
     At election time, if 60 percent of the white voters vote
for a white candidate, and 95 percent of the black voters vote
for the black opponent, it is white who are accused of racial
bias. There are 107 "historically black" colleges, whose
fundamental blackness must be preserved in the name of diversity,
but all historically white colleges must be forcibly integrated
in the name of... the same thing. To resist would be racist.     
     "Black pride" is said to be a wonderful and worthy thing, but
anything that could be construed as an expression of white pride
is a form of hatred. It is perfectly natural for third-world
immigrants to expect school instruction and driver's tests in
their own languages, whereas for native Americans to ask them to
learn English is racist.
     Blatant anti-white prejudice, in the form of affirmative
action, is now the law of the land. Anything remotely like
affirmative action, if practiced in favor of whites, would be
attacked as despicable favoritism.
     All across the country, black, Hispanic, and Asian clubs
and caucuses are thought to be fine expressions of ethnic
solidarity, but any club or association expressly for whites is
by definition racist. The National Association for the
Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) campaigns openly for black
advantage but is a respected "civil rights" organization. The
National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP)
campaigns merely for equal treatment of all races, but is said to
be viciously racist.
     At a few college campuses, students opposed to
affirmative action have set up student unions for whites,
analogous to those for blacks, Hispanics, etc, and have been
roundly condemned as racists. Recently, when the white students
at Lowell High School in San Francisco found themselves to be a
minority, they asked for a racially exclusive club like the ones
that non- whites have. They were turned down in horror. Indeed,
in America today, any club not specifically formed to be a white
enclave but whose members simply happen all to be white is
branded as racist.
     Today, one of the favorite slogans that define the
asymmetric quality of American racism is "celebration of
diversity." It has begun to dawn on a few people that "diversity"
is always achieved at the expense of whites (and sometimes men),
and never the other way around. No one proposes that Howard
University be made more diverse by admitting whites, Hispanics,
or Asians. No one ever suggests that National Hispanic University
in San Jose (CA) would benefit from the diversity of having
non-Hispanics on campus. No one suggests that the Black
Congressional Caucus or the executive ranks of the NAACP or the
Mexican-American Legal Defense and Educational Fund suffer from a
lack of diversity. Somehow, it is perfectly legitimate for them
to celebrate *homogeneity*. And yet any all-white group - a
company, a town, a school, a club, a neighborhood - is thought to
suffer from a crippling lack of diversity that must be remedied
as quickly as possible. Only when whites have been reduced to a
minority has "diversity" been achieved.
      Let us put it bluntly: To "celebrate" or "embrace"
diversity, as we are so often asked to do, is no different from
*deploring an excess of whites.* In fact, the entire nation is
thought to suffer from an excess of whites. Our current
immigration policies are structured so that approximately 90
percent of our annual 800,000 legal immigrants are non-white. The
several million illegal immigrants that enter the country every
year are virtually all non-white. It would be racist not to be
grateful for this laudable contribution to "diversity."        
It is, of course, only white nations that are called upon to
practice this kind of "diversity." It is almost criminal to
imagine a nation of any other race countenancing blatant
dispossession of this kind.
     What if the United States were pouring its poorest,
least educated citizens across the border into Mexico? Could
anyone be fooled into thinking that Mexico was being "culturally
enriched?" What if the state of Chihuahua were losing its
majority population to poor whites who demanded that schools be
taught in English, who insisted on celebrating the Fourth of
July, who demanded the right to vote even if they weren't
citizens, who clamored for "affirmative action" in jobs and
schooling?
     Would Mexico - or any other non-white nation - tolerate
this kind of cultural and demographic depredation? Of course not.
Yet white Americans are supposed to look upon the flood of
Hispanics and Asians entering their country as a priceless
cultural gift. They are supposed to "celebrate" their own loss
of influence, their own dwindling numbers, their own
dispossession, for to do otherwise would be hopelessly racist.   
     There is another curious asymmetry about American racism.
When non- whites advance their own racial purposes, no one ever
accuses them of "hating" another group. Blacks can join "civil
rights" groups and Hispanics can be activists without fear of
being branded as bigots and hate mongers. They can agitate openly
for racial preferences that can come only at the expense of
whites. They can demand preferential treatment of all kinds
without anyone ever suggesting that they are "anti-white."       
    Whites, on the other hand, need only express their opposition to
affirmative action to be called haters. They need only subject
racial policies that are clearly prejudicial to themselves to be
called racists. Should they actually go so far as to say that
they prefer the company of their own kind, that they wish to be
left alone to enjoy the fruits of their European heritage, they
are irredeemably wicked and hateful.
     Here, then is the final, baffling inconsistency about
American race relations. All non-whites are allowed to prefer the
company of their own kind, to think of themselves as groups with
interests distinct from those of the whole, and to work openly
for group advantage. None of this is thought to be racist. At the
same time, *whites* must *also* champion the racial interests of
non-whites. They must sacrifice their own future on the altar of
"diversity" and cooperate in their own dispossession. They are to
encourage, even to subsidize, the displacement of a European
people and culture by alien peoples and cultures. To put it in
the simplest possible terms, white people are cheerfully to
slaughter their own society, to commit racial and cultural
suicide. To refuse to do so would be racism.
     Of course, the entire non-white enterprise in the United
States is perfectly natural and healthy. Nothing could be more
natural than to love one's people and to hope that it should
flourish. Filipinos and El Salvadorans are doubtless astonished
to discover that simply by setting foot in the United States they
are entitled to affirmative action preferences over native-born
whites, but can they be blamed for accepting them? Is it
surprising that they should want their languages, their cultures,
their brothers and sisters to take possession and put their mark
indelibly on the land? If the once-great people of a once-great
nation is bent upon self-destruction and is prepared to hand
over land and power to whomever shows up and asks for it, why
should Mexicans and Cambodians complain?
     No, it is the white enterprise in the United States that
is unnatural, unhealthy, and without historical precedent. Whites
have let themselves be convinced that it is racist merely to
object to dispossession, much less to work for their own
interests. Never in the history of the world has a dominant
people thrown open the gates to strangers, and poured out its
wealth to aliens. Never before has a people been fooled into
thinking that there was virtue or nobility in surrendering its
heritage, and giving away to others its place in history.        
Of all the races in America, only whites have been tricked into
thinking that a preference for one's own kind is racism. Only
whites are ever told that a love for their own people is somehow
"hatred" of others. All healthy people prefer the company of
their own kind, and it has nothing to do with hatred. All men
love their families more than their neighbors, but this does not
mean that they hate their neighbors. Whites who love their racial
family need bear no ill will towards non-whites. They only wish
to be left alone to participate in the unfolding of their racial
and cultural destinies.
     What whites in America are being asked to do is
therefore utterly unnatural. They are being asked to devote
themselves to the interests of other races and to ignore the
interests of their own. This is like asking a man to forsake his
own children and love the children of his neighbors, since to do
otherwise would be "racist."
     What then, is "racism?" It is considerably more than any
dictionary is likely to say. It is any opposition by whites to
official policies of racial preference for non-whites. It is any
preference by whites for their own people and culture. It is any
resistance by whites to the idea of becoming a minority people.
It is any unwillingness to be pushed aside. It is, in short, any
of the normal aspirations of people-hood that have defined
nations since the beginning of history - but only so long as the
aspirations are those of whites.

------------------------

For further study on the issue of race listen to the recorded message,
_Scriptural Understanding of Race_ by Pastor Pete J. Peters.  Audio tape 
$4.00 offering, booklet by same name $1.00.

Available from Scriptures for America, 
P.O. Box 766-c, 
LaPorte, CO 80535 

---------------------------------------
Get the "Identity.faq" and many other files by
anonymous FTP from:    ftp.netcom.com /pub/SF/SFA
-------------------------------------------------

-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|   For unique political commentary & Christian views        Rick Savage    | 
|     Anonymous FTP:  ftp.netcom.com  - pub/SF/SFA           PO Box 5251    |
|   To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file       Denver, CO 80217 |
|       In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help.                 (u)SA       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Wed Aug  2 18:38:46 PDT 1995
Article: 7204 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!news.bc.net!info.ucla.edu!news.ucdavis.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Who_Rules
Message-ID: 
Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 1995 17:00:55 GMT
Lines: 111
Sender: rsavage@netcom20.netcom.com

From: ftp.netcom.com  pub/SF/SFA
--------------------------------

Re: Conspiracies. Who Rules?
   The real question that isn't asked among those who study conspiracies
is "Who Rules?"   The trap of all conspiracy theories is that they rarely
acknowledge God as in control of it all.  Those who desire to "expose"
the conspiracies are usually the conspiracies best converts because they
see no hope for change.  The conspiracy wins because they believe these
men really are controlling things which gives the conspiracy more power
over their beliefs and actions.  The following article deals with this
problem very well:

Who Rules?
by R.J. Rushdoony
 
One of the prevailing beliefs on the right and on the left is in
conspiracies.  People like to believe, "They did it to us."  Now
a conspiracy is a plan by a group of men to accomplish a
particular goal, and the goal may be good or bad.  There have
been no lack of conspiracies in history, and they are surely with
us today.  The important question is a moral and religious one:
who determines history?  Conspiracies, or men under God empowered
by the sovereign and determining God?
 
Christianity has said, over the centuries, that man is in SIN;
Christ is man's Savior, giving man SALVATION; and the purpose of
our salvation is SERVICE, doing the King's work in terms of the
King's law-word.
 
If we do not see this, the power of God working through us as
determinative of history, we will see another and a dangerous
answer.  We will then see history as 'determined by evil 
conspiracies which exercise a radical control and power over us. 
Men are then puppets and tools, not God's vicegerents called to 
make all things new in Him.  To regard conspiracies as 
determinative of history is to deny God's sovereignty.
 
Not too many years ago, a man became very angry with me for
saying that the Soviet Union could not endure because it was
anti-God.  The Soviet Union moreover was so derelict in its
economy that it was ensuring its own collapse.  This man insisted
that the laws of economy did not apply to the Soviet Union
because it had replaced economics with slavery.  He saw no hope
of its collapse.
 
In a world without God and His law, tyrannies can rewrite reality
and ensure their indefinite continuance, but in God's world the
wages of sin are always death.  We are commanded, "Trust in Him
at all times" (Ps. 62:8).  Because God is God, no power can or
does exist except by His permission.
 
To see history as determined by conspiracies, or by demonic
forces, or by evil men means, FIRST, to deny that God is the
Lord, that He is Sovereign.  SECOND, it also is a denial of our
responsibility.  Our Lord did not give us an impossible
commission (Matt. 28:18-20) but a totally possible, necessary,
and required one.  We need to read and reread the commission to
Joshua (Josh. 1:1-9), of which the Great Commission of our Lord
is an expansion (from Canaan to the world and all nations) while
a summary thereof.  The promises are remarkable: "Every place
that the sole of your foot shall tread upon, that have I given
unto you" (Josh 1:3).  "Have not I commanded thee?  Be strong and
of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for
the LORD thy God is with thee whatsoever thou goest" (Josh. 1:9).
 
One of our problems today is that we forget that we are a
COMMANDED people.  One of the greatest evils in the church today
is the heretical belief that WE choose Christ.  Our Lord in John
15:16 is emphatic that we do not choose Him but He chooses us and
commands us to bear fruit to Him.  People who deny God's
predestination scare me; some actually say, "I know what the
Bible says here, but it can't mean what it says."  God is not our
servant, although some will say, "He gives me what I ask for";
but He is our Lord and Commander who says, "You will give me all
of yourself and your substances as I require it."  Between the
two attitudes, there is a world of difference, and they are
different faiths.  Arminianism and conspiracy theories have much
in common.
 
Our is a command Faith because our God is the Lord, and He does
whatsoever He pleases (Ps. 115:3).  What He ordains cannot be
undone.  The nations or heathens do indeed rage, and the rulers
conspire together against God the Lord and His Messiah, but God
laughs, and He holds them in derision (Ps. 2:14).  We need to
share in that heavenly laughter.  Instead of trembling at the
vain imaginations of man, we need to stand fast in our faith.
 
Paul has a magnificent answer to all the evils the ungodly
perpetrate on God's people.  Whatever happens to us, "Nay, in all
these things we are more than conquerors through Him that loved
us" (Rom. 8:37).  This is an audacious statement.  Paul had in
mind Roman conquerors, their triumphal entries with many slaves,
the gold and other treasures of the conquered people, and their
leaders in chains.  As against this fact of might conquerors,
Paul simply states that we are MORE than these conquerors in our
victories when we faithfully serve our King.  Our King shall
reign when Marx, all his followers, and all other tyrants and
conspirators are only dim memories and fading lines in history. 
Our Lord is the great King over all kings.
------------

This is an exerpt from: Chalcedon Report, No. 358, May 1995
P.O. Box 158, Vallecito, CA 95251, Fax (209) 736-0536


-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|   For unique political commentary & Christian views        Rick Savage    | 
|     Anonymous FTP:  ftp.netcom.com  - pub/SF/SFA           PO Box 5251    |
|   To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file       Denver, CO 80217 |
|       In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help.                 (u)SA       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Wed Aug  2 18:38:57 PDT 1995
Article: 7205 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!news.Direct.CA!news3.insinc.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!news.bc.net!info.ucla.edu!news.ucdavis.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Sheep and Wolves
Message-ID: 
Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 1995 16:58:49 GMT
Lines: 612
Sender: rsavage@netcom20.netcom.com

---------------------------------------
Get the "Identity.faq" and many other files by
anonymous FTP from:    ftp.netcom.com /pub/SF/SFA
-------------------------------------------------

THE SHEEP AND THE WOLF
   by Richard Kelly Hoskins
 
     There are sheep and there are wolves.  A sheep is a sheep.  A 
wolf is a wolf.  Wolves eat sheep.  That's what they do.  Sheep try 
to keep from being eaten.  That's what they do.  Wolves think it is 
unreasonable for sheep to complain.  But, of course, that, too, is 
what they do.
 
THE SHEEP

     Sheep are predictable.  They all act the same way because that's 
the way they are bred.  They tend to congregate and follow a 
shepherd.  The shepherd leads them to green pastures.  The sheep 
graze, grow fat, and produce mutton, wool, milk, cheese, and skins.
     Obedient sheep obey their shepherd and tend to live lives 
which are productive and plentiful.  Sheep who disobey their 
shepherd may wander from the flock and be injured.  Many die in 
the teeth of the wolf.
     The smell of sheep is distinctive.  They possess scent glands 
between their cloven hooves and leave their scent wherever they 
walk.  Their urine and droppings also leave a distinctive odor.  
Sheep (1) ranges are distinctive because of this.  Sheep scent 
alone is sufficient to frighten most predators away from the flock.  
It is the area protected by the Shepherd and his dogs who will 
attack predators.
     The Shepherd has strict rules.  For countless generations he 
ruthlessly culled his flock.  Sheep showing aggressive traits 
permitting them to attack and kill other sheep have been quickly 
eliminated.  The result is that today it is almost impossible to find 
a sheep who will kill another sheep.  Like breeds like.
     While predators have countless ailments, sheep have few, and 
NO hereditary diseases.  Most serious diseases they catch are 
brought in by outsiders, and these have sometimes been known to 
almost wipe out a flock.
     When in danger sheep are led into the sheep fold by the 
shepherd.

THE WOLF
     The best killer and the best fighter becomes leader of the wolf 
pack.  Behaviorists call him the alpha wolf.  He mates with a 
female who is the best fighter among the female wolves.  She is 
called the alpha female.  The alpha female rules the pack in the 
absence of the alpha male.  Other members of the wolf pack do 
not breed.  The male and female alpha wolves mate and have many 
pups.  This is one way pack leaders can be identified.
     The total pack usually numbers between two and 8, although 
they may number up to 36.  Lone wolves may leave to seek a 
hunting ground of their own.  If he can find an unoccupied 
hunting area and an unattached female, a new pack may form.  If 
not, his life is hard.  Wolf packs do not welcome other wolves in 
their territories and will fight to keep them out.  These fights can 
be deadly.
     Social status in the rigid pecking order is revealed by 
observing smiles and bows when wolves meet - the subservient 
wolf makes more or both.  After meeting - wolves look away and 
seldom look directly at each other again.  A "direct look" means - 
"fight."
     Wolves communicate within the pack, and communicate with 
other packs as prey is chased from one hunting area to another 
hunting area where they cannot be safely followed.  Hunting 
tactics and strategy are sophisticated and individual members 
cooperate to "team chase" quarry.  When the kill is made, the 
alpha wolf eats first.  Wolves can be injured or killed in disputes 
over the remainder.
     The leading cause of death among wolves is other wolves.  The 
next most frequent cause of death is disease caught from 
contaminated diet since wolves are scavengers.  Death from 
parasites is next.  Last is death inflicted by the prey.
 
SHEEP TYPES
     Like the wolf - the Christian is the result of selective breeding.  
His shepherd is God the Word (2).  The Word tells him what to 
eat, what company to keep, and, demands that murderers, 
kidnappers, and rapists be put to death.  For 1000 generations 
violators have been put to death.  Like breeds like.  Consequently, 
it is extremely difficult to find a Christian who will commit 
murder.  Most Christians follow the wishes of their God and the 
result is that most are Law abiding, long lived, and have all they 
need in the way of worldly goods - neither too much nor too little. 
(3)
 
"NIGHT WOLVES"
     "Wolves of the night" usually kill their prey in a climate of 
sheep-ignorance - their ignorance of what is safe and what is 
dangerous contained in the Word.  "Night" is the Biblical 
expression for ignorance.
     Alpha wolves become pack leaders because they kill many 
other wolves and kill much prey.  "Human-wolves" become pack 
leaders when their killing ability justifies leadership.  Most are 
also excellent thieves who steal many horses and cattle and are 
able to buy many wives and have many children.  Like breeds like.  
An inspection of the jails of the east show them to be filled with 
black-wolves.  Wall street jails are full of tan trade-wolves.  
Wolves invariably run afoul of the law contained in the Word.  
That law was made for sheep.  Sheep are sheep, Wolves are 
wolves.  Sheep Law was made for sheep - wolves obey their pack 
leader.  Like breeds like.
 
WOLF LIFESTYLE - DISEASES
     Wolves are riddled with diseases.  In addition to all usual 
diseases they often have their own exotic diseases.  The black-
wolf has a distinctive blood disease and is susceptible to TB, the 
tan trade-wolf has up to 30 diseases of the nervous system 
peculiar to him alone.  Sheep, contacting wolves, have brought 
plagues back to their flock that have been disastrous. (4).  AIDS 
is the most recent disaster.  Testing disclosed that wolves are 
almost the sole plague carriers.  To prevent alarming the flocks of 
sheep to the fact that wolf contact is dangerous, carrier-testing and 
identity-disclosure was outlawed.  Doctors insisting on mandatory 
testing and quarantine risk being labeled - "anti-wolf".
     Wolves are predators.  Predators are hunters.  Hunters travel 
light.  Most seldom own anything that will hamper their chase 
form place to place.  Their possessions usually are things that can 
quickly be converted into items easily portable.  They tend to live 
in temporary apartments rather than home-folds, and keep their 
wealth in T-bills, cash, or corporate stock which can be instantly 
converted to cash, deposited in the back pocket, and off they go 
again!  The "stock certificate" is their contribution to economics.
     Sheep, having become used to associating with strangers not of 
Adamic descent, often continue to try to place the stranger by 
identifying his place of birth.  Sheep can usually give lengthy 
personal histories.  On the other hand, a wolf's background can 
seldom be verified.  Most say they come from distant places and 
tell stories that can't be confirmed.  "My family was in the military 
- we came from all over."  Seldom can cover stories be verified.  "I 
am an independent entrepreneur and manage my own affairs."  "I 
am a retired builder."  I am a dentist from Milwaukee."  The 
recently invented "lie detector" created havoc with wolf cover-
stories.  An anti "wolf-hate" law had to be passed to severely 
restrict its use.  The lie detector was a wolf disaster.  Until its 
advent the sheep had no idea that the harmless wolves wandering 
on the sheep's ranger were anything other than harmless.  The lie 
detector removed the sheep-spoor and reveled the wolf.  The cover 
had been stripped away.
     Wolves are seldom successful farmers.  Farming is against his 
nature.  It is a discipline that chains him to the soil, forces him to 
conserve and ration, and deprives him of the freedom to rest in the 
sun and run with the pack at night.
     When they do farm - which is infrequently, their bushel per 
acre production is far below that of sheep (5)  Most times they are 
forced to hire sheep to do it.  Their idea of hell is farming.  On 
their own they can take a productive farm and reduce it to a desert 
in a remarkably short time before abandoning it.  Their antipathy 
to the soil is a trademark of the wolf.
  
WOLF MERCY
     Wolves often toy with prey like a cat with a mouse.  "Mercy" 
or compassion is not in the vocabulary of a predator.  Prey may 
be kept alive for a purpose.  If no purpose can be found - they are 
liquidated.
     Sheep ranges invaded and then abandoned by wolves are 
discovered to contain innumerable sheep mass graves.  The allied 
wolves of the east are supposed to have liquidated 35,000,000 of 
their own kind in their Gulags, in addition to killing most of the 
remaining sheep who still live there, and great numbers in the 
lands they occupied for relatively short periods.
     POW's in sheep camps suffered the normal attrition of prison 
life - about 3%.  POWs in wolf prisons suffered between 50% 
and 100% deaths.  In Afghanistan the wolves lost 14,000 men in 
combat, AND, over 300,000 casualties suffered in training and 
physical abuse over the same period.  Wolves themselves cause 
most wolf casualties.  This is the way wolves live.
 
WOLF GREETINGS
     Sheep greet others as equals. (6)  They make quite requests 
and seldom blow car horns to demand right of way.  Female 
sheep are honored and permitted to go first; doors are opened for 
them.  Sheep even help wolves when they hunger or suffer 
disaster.  All of these acts are pronounced "commendable" by the 
Shepherd, BUT, these very same acts are seen as signs of 
subservience in the eyes of wolves.
     A wolf covered with sheep scent may act as a sheep while 
among sheep, but he reverts to wolf behavior when among wolves.  
In the wolf community - car horns blare demanding right-of-way, 
arguments rage over a price charged, people shove and try to 
break in line, and females must definitely help themselves.  An 
opened door elicits no "thank you" form the female wolf who 
stalks through.  It is her due from an "inferior" who admits he is 
inferior by opening the door in the first place.
     A car with a flat tire stopped on the roadside is signal for a 
"sheep-in-armor" to offer help, but, to a wolf - it signals possible 
"prey".

WOLF INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM
     Wolves post sentinels.  They insist on having at least one of 
their member in every club, school, and church.  Every tentative 
plan discussed by the sheep is instantly known to the wolf pack 
before most sheep know them.  Political organizations for the 
sheep are supplied with funds through wolf donations.  Sheep 
who "dance with wolves" are elected by the "wolf-talk" monopoly.  
It is the job of those who dance with wolves to open sheep-fold 
doors for the wolves and to keep them open.
     Where the wolf economics reigns supreme, (7) the wolf's 
media also reigns supreme.  It would be stupid of them to air any 
other opinion than their own wolf-howl.  Wolf monopoly media 
ensure that individual sheep data banks receive nothing non-
wolfish.  Media monopoly creates a political monopoly ruled by 
the media (8) in place of the rulers required by the Shepherd (9).  
Sheep may vote for anyone they like, but, the only ones they know 
about are the candidates who dance with wolves - the ones given 
media publicity.  The sheep complain that "there is no difference 
between political parties."  Surprise!, and also, "so what?"
     The wolf knows exactly what sheep say about him.  Self 
assured, he doesn't bother to deny the charges.  Instead, he repeats 
them and charges the speaker with "wolf-hate", a serious charge 
when wolves are judge and jury and levy punishment.  Wolf 
mercy is a proverb.
 
ANTI-WOLFISM
     To keep the pack from wandering and in hunting condition, 
pack-leaders continuously regale their packs with stories of the 
awful fate of the wolf who was betrayed by Little Red Riding 
Hood.  Wolves are kept paranoid.  All they can think of is that the 
woodsman may believe Little Red Riding Hood and take his ax 
and cut the wolf open so that the previously eaten grandmother 
can escape.  This cheerful bedtime story for sheep is a reoccurring 
nightmare to wolves who see nothing at all amusing about it.
     Wolves know EVERYTHING about the prey.  They spend a 
lifetime learning his strengths and weaknesses and gathering 
information.  They know his history.  Pack leaders almost all have 
law degrees.  They study his religion.  Many know scripture 
better than most preachers.  For the wolf, it's a question of life or 
death - to the preacher it is just a job.  They know the sheep 
prophecy of the time when the rams will unite and emerge from 
their sheepfold shoulder to shoulder.  This is another reason for 
the "fear" that identifies wolves (10).
     To avoid the woodsman's ax, wolf scouts are always testing the 
water.  "Who do you think is responsible for the L.A. riots?" 
"Who do you think is responsible for rise of red communism?"  
"Who do you think is responsible for the recent war in the middle 
east?"  To relieve the tremendous pent-up tension they almost 
"beg" the sheep to cry "WOLF!"  If someone does - their worst 
suspicions are confirmed.  They run to spread the dreaded news, 
"Someone has spotted a WOLF!  They know!  They know!  All 
is lost!"  Chaos reigns temporarily as wolfdom goes to "red alert."  
Eerie howls rise into the night - warning howls - howls calling 
"strays" and "stragglers", calls that trigger wolfdom's well 
rehearsed damage control.  It is a wolf ritual practiced again and 
again, over and over.  Every Saturday "wolf-howl", and countless 
wolf periodicals carry clips of past "prey uprisings" and warn 
wolves - "never again!"  The story of Little Red Riding Hood has 
lost none of its horror.  The self-righteous wolf howl complains to 
the world that wolves are oppressed - "ANTI-WOLFISM must be 
stamped out!"

CONVERTING WOLVES INTO SHEEP
     Wolves must get close to sheep to eat them.  To do this they 
roll in sheep urine and droppings to disguise their odor and then 
calmly approach the sheep as if one of them.  The sheep, seeing a 
strange visitor (11) are alarmed for a bit until they become used to 
the new arrival.  Then the wolf may walk safely into the sheep fold 
(12) and take his time choosing his prey.
     The easiest method to get into the sheepfold is for the wolf to 
become a sheep.  This difficult feat is performed by having one 
who dances with wolves throw a sheepskin over the wolf, repeat 
magic words, and sprinkle water on him.  It is then pronounced to 
the world that the wolf has become a sheep and is entitled to all 
rights and privileges associated with becoming a sheep.  He may 
now come and go in the sheepfold as he likes. (13)
     A minister recently told me this story.  A friend of his took a 
wild orphaned wolf pup and raised him in his home like a dog.  
He ran and frolicked, and grew up like any other normal dog.  
One day the man cut his hand chopping wood.  It bled.  He went 
into his house and fell asleep in his chair.  While asleep the wolf 
licked his bleeding hand and tasted blood.  the man was awakened 
to growls - "wolf growls".  Opening his eyes he found his 100 
pounds of grown puppy-dog-wolf standing directly in front of 
him with his teeth bared, and looking directly at him.  His blood 
ran cold.  He slowly slipped his hand into a nearby drawer, 
withdrew a pistol, and killed the wolf.
     A wolf is a wolf.  A wolf pup raised as a dog is a wolf.  A part 
wolf dog is a wolf (14).  A baptized wolf is a wet wolf.  Magic 
words said over a wolf can only make a magical wolf - not a dog.  
Like breeds lie. God made the sheep and god made the wolf.  He 
who dances with wolves is paid to fool the sheep, but God is not 
mocked (15).

EVIL EYE
     The old sheep-rule is this; "Never truth someone who will not 
look you in the eye."  It is a way of identifying a wolf.  This is not 
foolproof.  Some sheep are shy, and wolf pack leaders will look 
ANYONE in the eye.  But, it is a good rule-of-thumb.
     But if two wolves stand eye-to-eye, one may end up lying on 
the sidewalk outside a N.Y. restaurant with bullet holes in him.  
Among both dogs and wolves, the eye-to-eye look means - 
"fight".  Black-wolves do it regularly in boxing matches to 
"psych" their opponents.  Different strokes for different folks.
     The "evil eye" is virtually unknown among sheep, but it is part 
of wolf-life.  The "eye-to-eye" look of a pack leader or someone 
else important can bring disaster - a physical, economic, or social 
disaster.  A compliment from one with the "evil-eye" about a baby 
may cause its death.  To avoid these unpleasant effects many 
wolves will not look a person in the eye. (16)  Many, even most, 
wolves wear charms that resemble a half moon, a hand with 4 
fingers and the two middle ones retracted, crosses, or simple 
pieces of iron.  It keeps away the "evil eye." (17)

WOLF RELIGIONS
     Sheep look to their "Shepherd".  The wolf looks to his pack 
leader.  The pack leader leads the hunt and the pack downs its 
prey.  The ultimate provider is thus -the wolfpack.  They are their 
own messiah - their own savior.  The wolf's god is a combination 
of pack leader, whose word is law, the pack, and the wolf himself.  
It could be no other way. (18).
     "Hollywood" is a glimpse into wolf-heaven.  The never ending 
delightful story of wolves forever killing opponents, pulling down 
prey, wolves copulating, or passing gas - "Oh what fun - what 
rapture!"  Dirty filthy talk!  No sheep laws - no sheep rules.  
Wolf heaven!  This is as good as it gets!  It's what people want!"  
The wolf can't imagine anyone wanting to waste time watching a 
flock of sheep eating grass and going "baaa"!
     Every sheep household must listen to the wolves' nightly 
"wolf-howl".  It is all that is available.  Wolves use it to promote 
their wolf-approved brand of sheep-dip religion.  Sheep-
televangelists who "dance with wolves" are selected and they are 
given prime time.  The wealth they receive is payment for 
persuading the flock to open the sheepfold so wolves can come in.  
With straight faces they admit that grandma has said that she has 
big teeth - "the better to eat you with", and a big nose "the better to 
smell you with", but the reason for that is because she is a 
"sinner."  The wolf is really grandma and not a wolf.  "She just 
needs to be saved." (19)
     Coming from a televangelist it tends to set sheep-minds at 
ease.  Certain sheep, the one not tightly wrapped, believe these 
fairy tales and open the doors to turn the sheepfold into a smelly 
wolf's den and pig's sty with sheep-bones scattered about.  The 
televangelists coldly say whatever is required to stay on the air.  
They are well paid and content.  The sheep pay the price.  It is 
some small comfort to watch the false shepherds led to jail one by 
one. (20)
 
WOLF TRAINING
     Wolf pack leaders, deal with sheep-law, so almost all have law 
degrees.  They have to know sheep rules so that they can know 
where to go and what to do and what not to do.  Wolves don't use 
this training for their own use since most have no law but obey 
"policy" - the policy of their next level up pack leader.
 
WOLF STRATEGY
     The wolf must gain entry into the sheepfold if he is to eat 
sheep. This obstacle is the first to be surmounted.  To pass gate-
watching rams they can either don a sheepskin to fool the 
gatewatchers, or pay the gatewatchers to let him pass.
     The protective Word of the Shepherd must be driven from 
sheep schools, courts, and wolves must be planted in the 
seminaries to teach the sheep.  Confusion is the object.
     Then the gates must be opened to allow the wolf packs to be 
recruited form outside, more wolves make it easier to deal with the 
flock.  Any type of wolf is suitable for this work, white, yellow, or 
red, since all are united to hunt sheep.  Electing sheep who dance 
with wolves guarantees the open gate.
     All that is then needed is to keep the sheep occupied until all is 
complete and it is too late to stop matters.  This is accomplished 
by paying black robed legal and religious sheep to mesmerize the 
flock until time to slaughter them.
     In all this it never occurs to the wolves that if the sheep die they 
too will be doomed.  There will be nothing left to eat and the 
wolves will inherit a desolate continent the way it was before the 
sheep arrived and cleared pastures.

IMPERIUM
     The great commission given the sheep is to go into all the 
world and tell the sheep that obeying the Word of the Shepherd 
saves them from being eaten by wolves.  The next is to learn the 
ways of the wolf to keep from being eaten.
     Wolves kill, rend, eat and destroy.  Sheep build, create, gather, 
and help.  Sheep do one thing - wolves another.  A sheep is a 
sheep.  A wolf is a wolf.  Sheep do not wish the wolf ill, they just 
don't want to be eaten.  But, in spite of sheep wishing wolves the 
best - the fact is that wolves eat sheep.  That is what they do - and 
those sheep taught by the Shepherd are acutely aware that that is 
what they do.


FOOTNOTES

1.  "Sheep of the pasture" bear the three proofs of Israel:  (1) 
God's name - CHRISTIANS - "They shall put my name upon the 
children of Israel."  Num. 6:27  (2) Isaac's name, SONS OF 
ISAAC - ISAACSONS - SAXONS, "In Isaac shall thy name be 
called."  Romans 9:7, and (3) Adamic descent.  "Man" in Strong's 
Concordance is the Hebrew "Adam".  "Adam" means to "blush 
red".  "Show blood in the face."  Genuine Israelites (or 
Christians) can produce all three proofs.  "CHRISTIAN-
SAXON"-"MAN".

2.  "His name is called The Word of God."  Rev. 19:13

3.  "Give me neither poverty nor riches...lest I be full, and deny 
thee...or lest I be poor, and steal, and thus take the name of my 
God in vain."  Prov. 30:8-9

4.  Non-venereal syphilis contracted in Mexico killed upwards of 
50% of the population of Europe.  Bubonic plague brought in 
>from  the near east killed 2/3rds of many areas.  The Black Death 
>from  the far east did the same.  AIDS, the latest brought by 
integrationists from Africa is expected to match the others in total 
casualties.

5.  "And the Lord said...the voice of thy brother's blood crieth 
unto me from the ground.  And now art thou cursed from the 
earth...When thou fillest the ground, it shall not bring forth or 
yield unto thee her strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shall thou 
be in the earth."  Gen. 4:8-12

6.  "Ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy nation."  
1 Peter 2:9

7.  Usury is a contract considered fraudulent from its conception - 
where the victim promises to repay 11 when only 10 exists.  
Repayment can only be made by taking from another victim - but 
a victim is required.  "Usury," the ultimate monopoly - empties the 
countryside, creates the city and super-state, and demands taxes, 
socialism, and communism to protect the monopoly.

8.  "Thou mayest not set a stranger (Heb: zuwr - racial alien) over 
thee, which is not thy brother."  Duet. 17:15

9.  "Thou shalt set him king over thee...from among thy 
brethren...thou mayest not set a stranger over thee who is not thy 
brother."  Deut 17:15

10.  "'Be trembling and quaking.'  Then Cain trembled and 
became terrified; and through this sign did God make him an 
example before all the creation."  I Adam &  Eve 74:24-25

11.  "Stranger" has two meanings.  Strong's Concordance lists the 
word in the Hebrew usually under "ger" (1616), "zuwr" (2111), 
and sometimes "nokriy" (5237).  The "zuwr" (2111) stranger is 
the enemy, he is confrontational, one to be avoided.  (1)  "There is 
no hope; no' for I have loved strangers (Heb: zuwr - racial alien), 
and after them I will go"  Jer. 2:25.  (2)  "Receive a stranger into 
thine house, and he will disturb thee, and turn thee out of thine 
own."  Ecclesiasticus II 11:34.  The "ger" (1616) stranger is the 
kinsman from afar.  The one from a different political subdivision, 
but one to be accepted with open arms.

12.  Wolves smell differently from sheep.  Those who have 
worked or served with them in the army can tell you.  The lack of 
deodorants reveals a difference that is VERY noticeable.

13.  "Gentiles shall ye take to wife purifying...with an unlawful 
purification (baptism)."  Testament of Levi 4:17

14.  "A bastard (Heb: mamzer - mixed breed, mongrel) shall not 
enter into the congregation of the Lord (Israel)  Deut 23:2

15.  (1) "Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in 
the name of the Father, and of the son, and of the Holy Spirit."  
Matt 28:18-20, (2)  "Go ye into all the world and preach the 
gospel to every creature"  Mark 16:15  This refers to the scattered 
sheep.  The Law still holds:  (3)  "Go not unto the way of the 
Gentiles...But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel."  
Matt 10:5,6."  (4) "I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house 
of Israel, and to them alone."  Matt 15:24

16.  (1)  The Evil Eye, Frederic Thomas Elsworthy, London 1895  
(2)  The Evil Eye, Clarence Maloney, editor, Columbia Univ. 
Press, NY 1976

17.  Many from Transylvania and Hungary believe in werewolves 
and vampires.

18  "There are many nations...all are his, and over all has he 
appointed spirits to rule...but over Israel....he alone is their ruler."  
Jubilees  16:23

19.  (1)  Whosoever (of Israel, Matt 15:24) shall call upon the 
name of the Lord shall be saved."  Rom 10:13  (2)  "Saved from 
our enemies, and from the hand of all that hate us!"  Luke 1:71.  
(3)  "He that endureth to the end shall be saved."  Matt 10:22

20.  Woe to them...that justify the wicked for reward."  Isaiah 
5:22-23  (2)  "If a false witness rise up...Then shall ye do unto 
him, as he had thought to have done unto his brother." Deut 
19:16-19  (3)  "Judge this rather, that no man put a stumbling 
block or an occasion to fall in his brother's way."  Romans 14:13


=================================
Other Works by Richard K. Hoskins:
---------------------------------

VIGILANTES OF CHRISTENDOM
(The story of Militant Christianity)
Published by:  Virginia Publishing Company
Available from:  Scriptures for America,
                   P.O. Box 766-c,
                   LaPorte, Colorado 80535, USA
                   $20.00 postpaid

   Vigilantes of Christendom follows the spread of violent alien
liberation tactics into Christendom, gives the past history of
Christendom's own Phineas Priesthood, and projects startling
events that lie just ahead.

   Richard Kelly Hoskins is the author of the best seller, "War
Cycles/Peace Cycles" and other books, pamphlets and articles 
circulated worldwide.  His new book relates the history and 
rebirth of militant Christianity.  His research discloses that the 
rise of violent religious movements in other lands has triggered 
the same phenomenon  in the West.  No longer will political 
and economic considerations alone determine events in 
Christendom as people again begin to believe that their God's 
Laws must be enforced on earth and that God has created a 
priesthood to enforce them! 
     482 pages, hardback.

    As the Kamakazi is tot he Japanese
    As the Shiite is to Islam
    As the Zionist is to the Jews
    So the Phineas Priest is to Christendom

Vigilantes of Christendom - tells the stories of role models - 
Phineas, Sampson, King Arthur, Beowulf, St. George, Capt. 
John Smith, and many others.

Vigilantes of Christendom - tells the story of Death Wind who, 
after being ambushed by savages, killed 2000 in retaliation

Vigilantes of Christendom - tells the story of the attack on 
homosexuals and the destruction of porno-parlors

Vigilantes of Christendom - traces the assassinations of Western 
Christian leaders and the beginning of retaliation

Vigilantes of Christendom - tells the story of the execution of 
Alen Berg - foul mouthed anti-Christian disc jockey.

Vigilantes of Christendom - tells the story of Blood River in 
South  Africa where the Zulus say angels came and fought for 
the settlers.

------------------------------------
WAR CYCLES / PEACE CYCLES
Publisher: Virginia Publishing Company
Available from:  Scriptures for America,
                   P.O. Box 766-c,
                   LaPorte, Colorado 80535, USA
                   $10.00 postpaid

   Richard Kelly Hoskins has spent more than a quarter of a 
century working with Wall Street.  His articles have been 
published in newspapers and magazines across the nation.  This 
book may very well be the survival handbook of this generation.
   Cyclical interpretations of the boom/bust phenomenon that has 
dogged organized economies since antiquity are in vogue once 
again.  This one, by stock broker and financial consultant Hoskins, 
examines the process in the light of time-dishonored manipulation 
by international usurers, from Babylon to today's Wall Street.
   War Cycles/Peace Cycles lists the best investments to buy in the 
War Phase and the best in the Peace Phase.
   War Cycles/Peace Cycles shows how you can take over the U.S. 
trillion dollar debt and make 30 billion a year on the deal -FREE- 
if you have the right contacts.
   War Cycles/Peace Cycles projects the proper time to buy a 
house with very little money.
   War Cycles/Peace Cycles gives the history of municipal bond 
defaults.
   War Cycles/Peace Cycles gives the history of the major 50 year 
cycles in American going back to 1750.
   War Cycles/Peace Cycles gives the history of the gold price in 
the U.S. and how Jay Gould almost cornered gold.
   War Cycles/Peace Cycles lists land booms when land prices 
went from $800 an acre down to $1.25 an acre and back to $600 
an acre.
   War Cycles/Peace Cycles gives the history of the Bank of 
Amsterdam - the largest bank in the world.  It neither paid nor 
received interest.
   War Cycles/Peace Cycles shows how NY banks control 
business, media, and colleges as well as their faculties.
   War Cycles/Peace Cycles shows why defeated kings and rulers 
must be killed.

A few reports from Readers:
   "...a new book...by Richard Hoskins...It is very, very good...he 
reveals that in 1780 there were only two interest banks in the new 
United States.  Most of our colonial forefathers lived their whole 
lives in peace and prosperity without ever doing business with a 
bank!  Today most Americans would think that was impossible."  
-Sheldon Emry, AMERICA'S PROMISE Newsletter

   "We were VERY impressed with your book...Grandmother said 
that it answered the one question she had in college...WHY?  She 
didn't believe that Jenkins War was over a man's ear or that an 
assassination in Austria could cause the whole world to explode 
into WW I."  -Grandfather's Newsletter

   "The immediate earthquake in our present banking system...is 
clearly dealt with in Richard Hoskins' "War Cycles/Peace 
Cycles.""  -Dr. Otis B. Read, Jr. NEWS & VIEWS Newsletter

   "...War Cycles / Peace Cycles...is the work of a dedicated 
historian and excellent prose writer, well worth the price."  
-Edward T. Yorke, FINANCIAL NEWS ANALYSIS

---------------------------------------
Get the "Identity.faq" and many other files by
anonymous FTP from:    ftp.netcom.com /pub/SF/SFA
-------------------------------------------------

-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|   For unique political commentary & Christian views        Rick Savage    | 
|     Anonymous FTP:  ftp.netcom.com  - pub/SF/SFA           PO Box 5251    |
|   To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file       Denver, CO 80217 |
|       In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help.                 (u)SA       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Tue Aug 15 23:10:25 PDT 1995
Article: 31415 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: talk.religion.misc,alt.religion.christian,alt.revisionism
Path: news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Royce the comedian (Re: Identity denies second coming
Message-ID: 
Followup-To: talk.religion.misc,alt.religion.christian,alt.revisionism
Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References: <40omc9$ldu@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com> <40qtbb$5hk@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 1995 01:34:33 GMT
Lines: 40
Sender: rsavage@netcom6.netcom.com
Xref: news.island.net talk.religion.misc:106774 alt.religion.christian:39082 alt.revisionism:31415

Royce Buehler (buehler@space.mit.edu) wrote:

: Rick Savage has reappeared on the net
: He has made two long posts that don't even
: mention Jews or blacks! Their point: There will be no second coming, there
: will be no day of judgment.

    The Word is a standing indictment against the profane, unwashed, and 
cowardly blasphemers.  But your hyperactive paranoid harange was funny as 
it's wild conspiracies evolved into greater heights of hysteria.

: The point of that: God will never execute his judgment. He depends on righteous
: men to do all his punishing and killing for him.

     Read Romans 13, minus your state-worshiping biases and you'll get 
close to the truth.

: The point of that, of course, which Rick is working up to slowly and 
: deviously: all us Christians have a duty to kill the Jews, since God is
: powerless to avenge their alleged blasphemy without us. And anyone else
: Identity identifies as "God's enemies" must also be killed. (If anything
: suspicious ever happens to me, you'll know where to look! :-) 

    I liked the part, "slowly and deviously."  I thought only us 
so-called "right-wing" types believed in wild-eyed conspiracy theories?

: Real Christians should note that Identity has abandoned one of the fundamentals
: of the faith by denying the second coming. And, as in every other case where
: they disagree with all ordinary Christians, their motive for doing so is to
: encourage hatred and murder.

    Fundamentals of a false faith, perhaps.  
    If my motive was to encourage "hatred and murder" I should study 
yours very thoroughly.  You have a nack for demonizing and character 
assisination.  Where did you learn the art of defamation so well?
-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|   For unique political commentary & Christian views        Rick Savage    | 
|     Anonymous FTP:  ftp.netcom.com  - pub/SF/SFA           PO Box 5251    |
|   To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file       Denver, CO 80217 |
|       In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help.                 (u)SA       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Wed Aug 16 19:50:13 PDT 1995
Article: 31426 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Path: news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!news.wimsey.com!news.mindlink.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Re: Jews expose themselves
Message-ID: 
Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References:  <40oels$159m@rover.ucs.ualberta.ca>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 1995 01:38:39 GMT
Lines: 11
Sender: rsavage@netcom6.netcom.com

Adam Krims (akrims@gpu2.srv.ualberta.ca) wrote:
: Hey, I never expose myself, except in the privacy of my own home!
: Indignantly, AK
 
    :)  That may be true.  But is it really ok even in the privacy of 
your own home?  What's with the hole in the sheet?
-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|   For unique political commentary & Christian views        Rick Savage    | 
|     Anonymous FTP:  ftp.netcom.com  - pub/SF/SFA           PO Box 5251    |
|   To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file       Denver, CO 80217 |
|       In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help.                 (u)SA       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Wed Aug 16 19:50:16 PDT 1995
Article: 31427 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Path: news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Re: Israel_Identity_FAQ.pt1
Message-ID: 
Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References:  <40qkob$e6n@blackice.winternet.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 1995 01:39:53 GMT
Lines: 14
Sender: rsavage@netcom6.netcom.com

Joel Rosenberg (joelr@winternet.com) wrote:
: In , rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage) writes:
: >1.  What is the Christian message of Israel's Identity in a nutshell?

: A "nutshell" is a close approximation as to where the "Christian Identity"
: message belongs.

    Captain one-liner is at it again!  Thanks for the endorsement!  Where 
would we be today if you wouldn't pay us all this attention?  
-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|   For unique political commentary & Christian views        Rick Savage    | 
|     Anonymous FTP:  ftp.netcom.com  - pub/SF/SFA           PO Box 5251    |
|   To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file       Denver, CO 80217 |
|       In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help.                 (u)SA       |


From bzs@world.std.com Wed Aug 16 19:53:10 PDT 1995
Article: 31546 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Path: news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!world!bzs
From: bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein)
Subject: Re: Jews expose themselves
In-Reply-To: rsavage@netcom.com's message of Wed, 16 Aug 1995 01:38:39 GMT
Message-ID: 
Sender: bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein)
Organization: The World
References:  <40oels$159m@rover.ucs.ualberta.ca>
	
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 1995 21:12:20 GMT
Lines: 30


From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
>Adam Krims (akrims@gpu2.srv.ualberta.ca) wrote:
>: Hey, I never expose myself, except in the privacy of my own home!
>: Indignantly, AK
> 
>    :)  That may be true.  But is it really ok even in the privacy of 
>your own home?  What's with the hole in the sheet?

For any of you who may have missed it this is Mr Savage engaging in
very low anti-semitic comments.

The reference he's making is to a stereotype that certain orthodox
jews only have sex thru a hole in a sheet.

It's about on par with making watermelon comments to black people.

At least we all know what we're dealing with. Mr Savage, for all his
"identity christian" rhetoric, is really just another low-life,
knuckle-dragging hatemongerer.

Not that we doubted this.

Oh well, perhaps there's a reason God made him insane.

-- 
        -Barry Shein

Software Tool & Die    | bzs@world.std.com          | uunet!world!bzs
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 617-739-0202        | Login: 617-739-WRLD


From rsavage@netcom.com Fri Aug 18 15:18:08 PDT 1995
Article: 12518 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Re: J. Rosenberg: Liar or Jerk?
Message-ID: 
Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References:  <40qeqo$79i@blackice.winternet.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 1995 01:57:56 GMT
Lines: 22
Sender: rsavage@netcom6.netcom.com

Joel Rosenberg (joelr@winternet.com) wrote:
: In , rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage) writes:
: >    Has anyone ever saw this person post anything nice about anyone who 
: >wasn't kissing the Jew's collective bums?  

: Yes.

    Really?  You have other interests besides dumping on and defaming 
white nationalistist ideals?  

: >    Can we say Jewish Supremist?  Jews have a bad habit of calling their 
: >adversaires everything they are.

: Yes, I call you a phony, because you are a phony, Les.

    Yes you do have a bad habit of accusing your adversaries of your 
worst qualities?  
-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|   For unique political commentary & Christian views        Rick Savage    | 
|     Anonymous FTP:  ftp.netcom.com  - pub/SF/SFA           PO Box 5251    |
|   To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file       Denver, CO 80217 |
|       In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help.                 (u)SA       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Fri Aug 18 15:18:13 PDT 1995
Article: 12519 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Re: Jesus the Aryan
Message-ID: 
Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References:  <40orke$ao9@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 1995 01:55:27 GMT
Lines: 32
Sender: rsavage@netcom6.netcom.com

Harold3248 (harold3248@aol.com) wrote:
: There is a reason why so many in the white movement are Pagan.  I fight
: for my right to be Pagan first...all else comes second.  I beg to differ
: that Christ was divine to begin with, and I beg to differ that he was
: Aryan.

    Well you are entitled to your opinions and desires I suppose.  I just 
want the truth.

: There is a book titled Our Lady by Upton Sinclair.  Upton Sinclair had a
: genuis IQ that was mind blowing.  (Documented.)  He researched the Virgin
: Mary.  Facts suggest she was an olive complexion Jewish woman.  She had a
: gigantic nose.  She also would have been DEAD in her day if she had not
: been participating in the occult of the times based on daily village life.

   This would weigh heavier than eye-witness testimony of people who 
actually were contemporaries of Jesus and saw Him in the flesh?  I think 
a court of law would differ with you if you'd want to hold up this book 
above the Roman eye-witnesses.  I think this book of fiction would have a 
hard time over-turning Roman eye-witness testimony.

: The book closes with the Virgin Mary picking up the photo of a beautiful
: fairy princess blonde woman (Virgin Mary), and she asks, "Who is this?"
: I am Pagan for my ancestral roots as well.  I prefer (Irish) Witta
: beliefs.

    Soulds like a great story if I prefered novels to history.
-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|   For unique political commentary & Christian views        Rick Savage    | 
|     Anonymous FTP:  ftp.netcom.com  - pub/SF/SFA           PO Box 5251    |
|   To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file       Denver, CO 80217 |
|       In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help.                 (u)SA       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Sun Aug 20 11:49:25 PDT 1995
Article: 12879 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Re: Jesus the Aryan
Message-ID: 
Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References:  <4124i0$5lj@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 1995 23:17:13 GMT
Lines: 20
Sender: rsavage@netcom5.netcom.com

DavidG3276 (davidg3276@aol.com) wrote:
: I guess that I'm puzzled why this topic is even being discussed.  The
: Gospels clearly describe Jesus in a Jewish context.  If you want to
: discard the Gospels and the "jewishness" of Jesus as they describe it,
: that's your privilege, but I can't see on what basis you can make the
: argument.

    Excuse you?  The "Jewishness" of Jesus?  Does Matt. 23 read like an 
endorsement of Phariseeism/Judaism?  
    Define "Jew."  Then maybe you could make some sense out of the 
statement above.  Jesus the Christ was "Jewish" thus he rejected Himself 
as the Messiah?  Such "logic" is beyond me.  
    Read "Facts_are_facts" for an education about so-called, self-styled 
"Jews."  It can be found from the ftp site at:
        ftp.netcom.com/pub/SF/SFA/Bible
-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|   For unique political commentary & Christian views        Rick Savage    | 
|     Anonymous FTP:  ftp.netcom.com  - pub/SF/SFA           PO Box 5251    |
|   To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file       Denver, CO 80217 |
|       In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help.                 (u)SA       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Wed Aug 30 15:31:35 PDT 1995
Article: 4002 of alt.conspiracy
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: End Ritual Murder in Ireland
Message-ID: 
Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 17:58:18 GMT
Lines: 113
Sender: rsavage@netcom3.netcom.com

End Ritual Murder in Ireland,
     The following letter was sent to Martin McGuinness,  Irish
Repubican Leader of Sinn Fein who has led a 25 year fight 
against Bankster/Freemasonic British Cabal.
     Similiarity of American Civil War with the Irish conflict 
illustrated.
------------------
August 26th, 1995

Martin McGuinness
Ard Comhairle, Sinn Fein

M#irt#n A Chara,
       Allow me to introduce myself.  My name is Brian Kennedy; I'm a 
fourth generation American.  For all my adult life, about 30 years 
now, I have been a supporter of Sinn Fein's chief aim: the 
reunification of Ireland.
       Sinn Fein's peace initiative has been a great boon for the people 
of the occupied six counties, both protestant and Catholic alike.  I 
am writing you to urge you not to destroy it because of the 
intransigence of the British Empire.  There is a better way to force 
the Brits to the peace table.
       As you know, the problem in Northern Ireland is NOT Catholic vs. 
protestant, although it is purposely made to appear that way.  The 
real problem is the triumphalism of the Orange Order -- more 
specifically, it is the small group of agitators that cause the 
triumphalism to begin with.
       Martin, you could search the bookstores and libraries on both 
sides of the Atlantic, but you would not find a written history of the 
Orange Order; and there is a very good reason for that.
       The bankers (they should be called BANKSTERS) who control the 
British Empire don't want you looking at the freemasonic origin of 
the Orange Order.  The top Orangemen are also high-ranking 
freemasons, who take their orders from the grand commander of all 
freemasonry. At present, that man is the Duke of Kent, who is Queen 
Elizabeth's first cousin.  
       As you might easily guess, THAT is the real center of power in 
the British Empire.
       The freemasonic influence which permeates the Orange Order 
leadership is the real reason for Orange triumphalism; and that has 
been true throughout the almost 300 year history of Orange 
"loyalism."  This is a fact that is unknown to 95% of the rank and file 
Orangemen; but it is the very heart of the misnamed "Orange 
problem." It should really be called a freemasonic problem.
       Put the problem in perspective. While freemasonry is a world-
wide fifth column, and is deliberately designed by the British Empire 
to infiltrate and eventually destroy any country in which it takes 
root, it is concentrated in just two countries: thev United States and 
the` United Kingdom. Eighty percent of all freemasons live in my 
country and the U.K.
       Many Americans have wondered why our so-called "free country" 
sided with England, and not Argentina, during the Falkland War, or 
why our "justice" department is nothing more than a rubber stamp to 
the British embassy's wishes.
       Freemasonry is the reason why.  It was here before the 
American Revolution.  And even though the British lost that war, 
they still maintained covert control over America through their 
control of freemasonry.
       Freemasonry is the Trojan Horse that has subverted my country; 
and it is also destroying yours.
       Our American Civil War, 1861 to 1865, is a perfect example of 
how the British Empire plays divide and conquer politics. No one in 
his right mind, north or south, ever wanted that war.  There were 
strenuous efforts to reach a compromise before the shooting 
started; but all those efforts ultimately failed, and we suffered 
through the bloodiest war in our history.  Why?
       Our Civil War was stirred up and instigated to punish us for 
daring to leave the British Empire.  Slavery was only the Judas goat 
issue used by the freemasons, to inflame public opinion on both 
sides.
       The slavery card was played just like the Orange card is being 
played today.  The British Empire NEVER changes its method of 
operation; it always divides, in order to conquer.
       After that Rothschild plan failed, and and our union was 
preserved, Abraham Lincoln was assassinated by a freemasonic 
agent of the British Empire. It was a revenge killing.
       The rest, as they say, is history.  The subversion of both Ireland 
and the United States continues -- right down to this very day.
       What, then about the future?
       Martin, should it become necessary to once again take up arms 
against the British Empire (your REAL enemy), the IRA leadership 
ought to seriously consider limiting the fighting to the British 
mainland ONLY.  The Irish, both protestant and Catholic, have already 
suffered enough.
       Any future warfare should be directed at the real cause fo the 
world's agony: the hideous financial oligarchy that operates out of 
the City of London, which has floated the world in blood for hundreds 
of years now.  THEY, and not your protestant fellow Irishmen, are 
your real enemies.  The Rothschilds, the Cecils, the Mountbattens, 
and the men on the acceptance committee of the Bank of England are 
the real persecutors of the people of Ireland.
       The men in the IRA have nothing to gain, but they have a lot to 
lose, by breaking the truce with the loyalists.  The UVF is satisfied 
with a "no first strike" pledge.  Why can't our side accept the same 
stipulation?  That seems reasonable enough to me.
       It will probably take many more years before all arms are 
finally out of circulation.  The more immediate problem is to get the 
British troops out of Ireland  That will only happen when the rulers 
of the British Empire are made to realize that you won't fall for 
their ruse.
       The mattoids who run the real evil empire want you to fight 
THEIR instigated war on YOUR soil.  It's a trap, Martin!  Please don't 
walk into it.

Tiocfaidh #r l#,

Brian Kennedy 

-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|   For unique political commentary & Christian views        Rick Savage    | 
|     Anonymous FTP:  ftp.netcom.com  - pub/SF/SFA           PO Box 5251    |
|   To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file       Denver, CO 80217 |
|       In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help.                 (u)SA       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Wed Aug 30 15:31:41 PDT 1995
Article: 4030 of alt.conspiracy
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Impasse (IRA & Brits)
Message-ID: 
Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 18:28:40 GMT
Lines: 255
Sender: rsavage@netcom3.netcom.com

The Impasse 
(Commentary on Irish Republican Army & British Negotiations)
   by Brian Kennedy

      Irish Republicans are understandably frustrated at the current 
deadlock over the start of all-party talks. Those talks, in turn,  would 
(hopefully) lead to a negotiated settlement and permanent peace in a 
united Ireland. Ulster protestants would be a sizeable minority in a 
united Ireland; therefore, they would have to have guarantees of 
religious freedom for their people. That's clearly  understood.

     All the items listed above could certainly be worked out at the peace
table. Yet currently there is a roadblock in the way of Sinn Fein's 
approach to the peace table. Why?
     The decommissioning of IRA arms has been put forth by the Tory 
government as the roadblock to the peace conference. But that is a 
spurious issue.  The real impediment to the start of peace talks is the 
true nature of the British Empire; and that dual nature is dimly, if at 
all, understood by Irish Republicans.
     Let's take a look at it, shall we?
     First of all, no one should confuse the British Empire with the 
present-day government of England.  Governments come and go, but the 
British Empire ENDURES.  You might think of John Major's government as a 
small school of flying fish darting across the surface of the ocean, 
while a giant octopus (the British Empire) swims deeply below the school, 
shadowing its every move.  The school of flying fish is forced to swim 
completely on the ocean's surface, where it is battered by every wind, 
wave and storm that passes by. Also, the school of fish is almost 
completely at the mercy of its natural predators.  Birds can see it
>from  the air;  sharks can see it from below.
     The giant octopus has none of the problems that beset the fish.  
Because of its size, sharks and other predators are reluctant to attack 
it.  Because it swims so deeply, it is practically invisible from the 
surface of the ocean.  But any time it wants to, it can reach up with one 
of its tentacles and knock the school of flying fish senseless. The fish, 
in fact, will never even know what hit them.
     The tentacles of the British Empire, you must understand, are extremely
long.  They reach into every corner of the world.
     The next fiction that must be dispensed with is the idea that the 
British Empire disintegrated, mostly of its own weight,  after the end of 
World War II.  Today, it only survives in the six occupied counties of 
northern Ireland, the Falkland Islands, British Hong Kong (the nerve 
center of the international drug trade), and a few other small, scattered 
places.  That, at least, is the conventional wisdom.
     This is a lie, and a monstrous one.  It's so big, in fact, that it is
unrivalled in the whole history of propaganda.  And the fact that most 
of the world believes it to be true is a  tribute to how cleverly this 
ruse has been designed and executed.
     Conventional wisdom isn't worth a bucket of Margaret Thatcher's 
warm spit. If you want conventional wisdom, go read the doorstop of a 
book she wrote.
     What actually happened after World War II was this.  The rulers 
of the British Empire pulled down the Union Jack in almost every place it 
flew.  (In 1945, the British Empire covered one-fourth of the land 
surface of the earth.)  They did this in order to accomplish their real, 
constant, and  main objective: complete, total, and lasting world 
domination.  They realized that they could never conquer the world 
militarily and still hold it together by force of arms.  Uprisings, such 
as the ones in Ireland in 1798 and 1916, and in India in 1842, 1845, and 
1849, are inevitable under any system of overt rule.  That kind of 
suzerainty is always seen as oppressive by the native people who suffer 
under it.  They rightly resent it.
     Spiritual unity, however, was viewed as entirely possible, and as 
the next best alternative to direct rule from London.  So, the evil 
geniuses who control the British Empire decided to implement the 
alternative system: spiritual unity.  In plain English, spiritual unity 
entails brainwashing.
     You see, the banksters found out, many years ago, that a man with a 
chain around his ankle, who was forced to work as a slave, would never do 
any more work than he absolutely had to.  He perceived himself as a 
slave, and rightly so.  But if you took the chain off that same man's 
leg, and in its place gave him a master charge card  and a mortgage on a 
house that he thought he owned, his whole attitude would change.  He 
would actually break his back working to pay off the usurious debts those 
same bankers saddled him with.   
     The man in this example only traded his steel chain for an invisible 
one. Indeed, he is even more of a slave under the latter system than he 
was under the former, for now he has to buy his own clothing, his own 
food, his own shelter, and his own medical care.  But now, he has the 
illusion of freedom; and that makes him produce far more for the same 
usurers who exploited him in the original example.  The banksters didn't 
change at all, but the man changed drastically; and all of it was due to 
his changed perception of reality.
     The lesson is this: the overlords of the Bank of England put an 
awful lot of stock into how they are perceived by the laboring masses of 
men and women.  They do this because they know that the illusion of 
freedom, the covert system, works better than the older one, the overt 
system of outright slavery.
     This is why the modern-day British Empire always disguises itself 
under another name.  In the U.S., it calls itself "the new world 
order."   This was one of George Bush's favorite phrases, when he was 
president.  That fact should explain why he referred to England as Òthe 
mother countryÓ in a speech he made when he welcomed  Queen Elizabeth II 
to our shores several years ago.  George Bush is a traitor to his 
country.  His loyalty is to England, not to the U.S.  The only reason he 
hasn't been tried for treason, and hung for it, is that most Americans 
are still in the altered state of consciousness that the banksters
deem necessary to control the world's people. 
      All control nowadays is spiritual control.  That's an important point;
please keep it in mind.
     The Latin phrase novus ordo seclorum on the back of a U.S. one 
dollar bill could be translated as Ònew world order.Ó  The higher adepts 
of freemasonry, who put it there, have always understood its 
significance.  (Freemasonry has always been a British institution, ever 
since its founding in London in 1717.)  Now, so should you.
     Once you know how to look for the veiled identity of the British 
Empire, you will begin to see it almost everywhere.  The many disguises 
it dons will be dealt with quite extensively in a book this writer will 
publish on the internet shortly, under the title:  The Coming War With 
England.
     The very phrase "new world order" implies that an old world order 
exists; and, in fact, that is exactly the case.  The old world order 
refers to united Christendom, which reached it apogee in the thirteenth 
century.  Now, as then, it has been led by the Catholic Church.  The 
Catholic Church has always been the British Empire's most formidable 
foe.  All of the world's seemingly confusing events, and all of its 
apparent contradictions, can be grasped and understood once you begin to 
look at the constant war being waged, usually behind the scenes,  by the 
British Empire and the Catholic Church.  It is the pattern necessary to 
put all the pieces of the puzzle together.
     Both sides have many allies and numerous sub-groups -- almost too 
many to list.  The alliances have changed somewhat over the centuries, 
too.  But for now, just fix in your mind the identity of the main 
combatants: the British Empire and the Catholic Church, the new world 
order and the old world order.
     The current impasse in northern Ireland is a perfect example of how 
events are stage-managed behind the scenes by the mattoids of the British 
Empire.  After twenty-five years of relentless fighting, both sides have 
declared truces, and have looked to London to start peace talks.  London, 
however, constantly stalls by bringing up meaningless and spurious 
issues.  Why?
     The answer lies in the Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde nature of the British
Empire.  People only  look at the public face, the face of Henry 
Jekyll; and everything they see is the epitome of respectability.  John 
Major, Patrick Mayhew, et al. get all the press coverage, so people 
naturally assume that there is nothing else to the picture.
     Mr. Hyde, however, works only at night, unseen by most eyes.  He 
shuns all publicity, lest his crimes come to light.  But he controls Dr. 
Jekyll, even more completely than a ventriloquist controls his dummy.
     The stockholders of the Bank of England are rarely seen and almost 
never written about; but they control the destiny of the British Empire 
ABSOLUTELY.
     Irish Republican supporters should wake up to the fact that the real
British Empire -- the one that's hardly visible Ñ does not want peace.  
(If it did, there would be peace right now.)  The Neo-British Empire 
thrives on continued conflict.  This is how it manages its empire. It 
always sets up two sides to every conflict, and tries to manipulate both 
of them in the direction it desires.  (This is a pattern used over and 
over again, throughout the British Empire; it's not confined to the 
occupied six counties.  The current debacle in Bosnia has the exact same 
pattern, and the British Empire is behind all the bloodshed there, too.)  
That direction will always be towards a one-world government, with one 
religion, one darker-colored race, and most importantly, one mindset.  
The evil rulers of the Neo-British Empire know that once people begin to 
think as one, they will act as one.  And once people have been 
successfully maneuvered into that zombie-like mental state, they can be 
taught to never rebel against their masters. (This is the real reason 
behind all the ecumenical, one-world garbage you are so constantly 
bombarded with. It is designed to make you a willing slave of the "new 
world order," a/k/a the Neo-British Empire.  One thing is certain: it 
does NOT come from any altruistic motives.)  The Rothschilds, Cecils, and 
Mountbattens KNOW that the only lasting form of conquest is spiritual and 
psychological in nature.
     People in northern Ireland, as in Bosnia,  South Africa, and 
elsewhere, are not yet in the desired state of mental uniformity.  This 
is why the world we see around us never experiences any cease to war and 
conflict.  The common people (the masses) have not been beaten down 
enough yet!  The British Empire plan is to exhaust both sides in every 
conflict so completely that both  will turn to the proferred solution 
>from  sheer desperation and exhaustion. Like the old Pax Romana, the new 
world order's Pax Britannica will look tranquil on the surface, but will 
be seething with rebellion underneath.  That's one reason the Irish 
Republican struggle has lasted so long.  It is being studied, and 
carefully, in order to develop blueprints for coping with any resistance 
to the "new world order."  The Draconian measures used against Sinn 
Feiners in the occupied six counties will probably be imported to the 
United States in the near future -- all in the name of combatting 
"terrorism," of course.
     The Catholic Church, as you might guess, is well aware of the 
Neo-British Empire's plan; and like its mortal adversary, the papacy 
looks at events from an extremely high vantage point.  Its view of world 
events spans centuries.  It takes a long-range view of things, and as a 
result does not get bogged down in solving every immediate conflict.  The 
papacy can afford to wait. Also, the Catholic Church is extremely 
secretive about its affairs -- especially its financial empire.
     In brief, this is why Irish Republicans will not see peace in 
Ireland any time soon.  The Pax Britannica, if it comes at all, will not 
occur until after World War III has taken place -- and that hasn't even 
started yet.  (It has, however, been planned in advance for many, many 
years Ñ just like all other modern wars have been.)  
     The men in Sinn Fein should realize, if they haven't already, that 
they are only pawns in a much larger chess game.  The stakes are quite 
high: spiritual and temporal control of the entire world.  It is time for 
Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness to step outside of the little grove of 
trees they're in and take a look at the whole forest.  They should 
realize that they are guinea pigs in a bloody and gruesome social 
experiment (just as the protestants are).  The British Empire will spill 
every drop of blood it has to, in order to accomplish its objective -- 
complete world domination.  The Rothschilds and the Cecils couldn't care 
less about what happens in Ireland, or Bosnia, or anyplace else.  Like 
the Rockefeller, Harriman and Bush families in our own country, these 
people are mattoids Ñ supremely evil persons.  What you and I call a 
war, they call an urban renewal project.  What we call murder, they call 
necessary population reduction.  They looked at the Irish potato famine 
the same way we would look at pruning some fruit trees in our back 
yards.  These are the kind of people we are up against.
     What, then, is the answer?  The leaders of Sinn F#in should realize 
that Mayhew and Major are mere political marionettes, who only dance to 
the music their John Bull puppeteers pick out for them.  "He who pays the 
piper, calls the tune"  should be understood by anyone.  All politicians, 
in any country, are beholden to the people who finance their campaigns Ñ 
the bankers.  John Major began his working career as a teller in a 
Rothschild bank.  Any one who thinks Mr. Major is anything more than the 
head teller, today, is simply naive.
     Start doing what investigative reporters have always done Ñ follow the
money trail.
     The only reason Sinn Fein was even able to have the secret talks 
that led up to the Downing St. Declaration was because of the April 1992 
bomb in front of the Baltic Exchange building.  That location is only a 
short distance away from the Bank of England -- "the Old Lady of 
Threadneedle Street."  Lord Rothschild's bank is the real nerve center of 
the Neo-British Empire.  The mattoids who run the NBE had a very close 
call in 1992 -- too close for their comfort, in fact.
     In brief, there will be no progress toward peace in Ireland, 
Bosnia, or anyplace else until the evil geniuses who control the 
Neo-British Empire are given an incentive to want peace, rather than 
war.  Lord Rothschild and his despicable cronies profit greatly from 
war.  His family, like the queen's, have profited from every other war in 
the last 300 years.  (The Bank of England was founded in 1694.)  If peace 
were to come, his profits would go  down considerably.
     This is the crux of the problem.  The solutions, albeit tentative, 
will be covered in The Coming War With England, which will be released to 
the internet in numerous sites shortly, including IRL-NEWS.
       Irish Republican supporters around the world  would be well 
advised to avail themselves of these excellent research tools.  Remember, 
we need solutions -- BADLY.  The current impasse is certainly nothing new; 
but it can  be overcome if we put enough brainpower into the effort.  
This short essay has, necessarily, only touched on the highlights (or, 
perhaps, you might more correctly call them lowlights) to make you all 
aware of the magnitude of the problem.
       It is time for many of us to expand our horizons.  Let's start 
looking at the things the queen, the freemasons, and the other British 
Empire Benedict Arnolds don't want us to look at.  I say that's where the 
solution will lie.
       What do you think?


                                    Ñ      Tiocfaidh  #r  l#,
                                                Brian Kennedy.

-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|   For unique political commentary & Christian views        Rick Savage    | 
|     Anonymous FTP:  ftp.netcom.com  - pub/SF/SFA           PO Box 5251    |
|   To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file       Denver, CO 80217 |
|       In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help.                 (u)SA       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Wed Aug 30 16:05:45 PDT 1995
Article: 263162 of talk.politics.misc
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: End Ritual Murder in Ireland
Message-ID: 
Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 18:02:32 GMT
Lines: 113
Sender: rsavage@netcom3.netcom.com

End Ritual Murder in Ireland,
     The following letter was sent to Martin McGuinness,  Irish
Repubican Leader of Sinn Fein who has led a 25 year fight 
against Bankster/Freemasonic British Cabal.
     Similiarity of American Civil War with the Irish conflict 
illustrated.
------------------
August 26th, 1995

Martin McGuinness
Ard Comhairle, Sinn Fein

M#irt#n A Chara,
       Allow me to introduce myself.  My name is Brian Kennedy; I'm a 
fourth generation American.  For all my adult life, about 30 years 
now, I have been a supporter of Sinn Fein's chief aim: the 
reunification of Ireland.
       Sinn Fein's peace initiative has been a great boon for the people 
of the occupied six counties, both protestant and Catholic alike.  I 
am writing you to urge you not to destroy it because of the 
intransigence of the British Empire.  There is a better way to force 
the Brits to the peace table.
       As you know, the problem in Northern Ireland is NOT Catholic vs. 
protestant, although it is purposely made to appear that way.  The 
real problem is the triumphalism of the Orange Order -- more 
specifically, it is the small group of agitators that cause the 
triumphalism to begin with.
       Martin, you could search the bookstores and libraries on both 
sides of the Atlantic, but you would not find a written history of the 
Orange Order; and there is a very good reason for that.
       The bankers (they should be called BANKSTERS) who control the 
British Empire don't want you looking at the freemasonic origin of 
the Orange Order.  The top Orangemen are also high-ranking 
freemasons, who take their orders from the grand commander of all 
freemasonry. At present, that man is the Duke of Kent, who is Queen 
Elizabeth's first cousin.  
       As you might easily guess, THAT is the real center of power in 
the British Empire.
       The freemasonic influence which permeates the Orange Order 
leadership is the real reason for Orange triumphalism; and that has 
been true throughout the almost 300 year history of Orange 
"loyalism."  This is a fact that is unknown to 95% of the rank and file 
Orangemen; but it is the very heart of the misnamed "Orange 
problem." It should really be called a freemasonic problem.
       Put the problem in perspective. While freemasonry is a world-
wide fifth column, and is deliberately designed by the British Empire 
to infiltrate and eventually destroy any country in which it takes 
root, it is concentrated in just two countries: thev United States and 
the` United Kingdom. Eighty percent of all freemasons live in my 
country and the U.K.
       Many Americans have wondered why our so-called "free country" 
sided with England, and not Argentina, during the Falkland War, or 
why our "justice" department is nothing more than a rubber stamp to 
the British embassy's wishes.
       Freemasonry is the reason why.  It was here before the 
American Revolution.  And even though the British lost that war, 
they still maintained covert control over America through their 
control of freemasonry.
       Freemasonry is the Trojan Horse that has subverted my country; 
and it is also destroying yours.
       Our American Civil War, 1861 to 1865, is a perfect example of 
how the British Empire plays divide and conquer politics. No one in 
his right mind, north or south, ever wanted that war.  There were 
strenuous efforts to reach a compromise before the shooting 
started; but all those efforts ultimately failed, and we suffered 
through the bloodiest war in our history.  Why?
       Our Civil War was stirred up and instigated to punish us for 
daring to leave the British Empire.  Slavery was only the Judas goat 
issue used by the freemasons, to inflame public opinion on both 
sides.
       The slavery card was played just like the Orange card is being 
played today.  The British Empire NEVER changes its method of 
operation; it always divides, in order to conquer.
       After that Rothschild plan failed, and and our union was 
preserved, Abraham Lincoln was assassinated by a freemasonic 
agent of the British Empire. It was a revenge killing.
       The rest, as they say, is history.  The subversion of both Ireland 
and the United States continues -- right down to this very day.
       What, then about the future?
       Martin, should it become necessary to once again take up arms 
against the British Empire (your REAL enemy), the IRA leadership 
ought to seriously consider limiting the fighting to the British 
mainland ONLY.  The Irish, both protestant and Catholic, have already 
suffered enough.
       Any future warfare should be directed at the real cause fo the 
world's agony: the hideous financial oligarchy that operates out of 
the City of London, which has floated the world in blood for hundreds 
of years now.  THEY, and not your protestant fellow Irishmen, are 
your real enemies.  The Rothschilds, the Cecils, the Mountbattens, 
and the men on the acceptance committee of the Bank of England are 
the real persecutors of the people of Ireland.
       The men in the IRA have nothing to gain, but they have a lot to 
lose, by breaking the truce with the loyalists.  The UVF is satisfied 
with a "no first strike" pledge.  Why can't our side accept the same 
stipulation?  That seems reasonable enough to me.
       It will probably take many more years before all arms are 
finally out of circulation.  The more immediate problem is to get the 
British troops out of Ireland  That will only happen when the rulers 
of the British Empire are made to realize that you won't fall for 
their ruse.
       The mattoids who run the real evil empire want you to fight 
THEIR instigated war on YOUR soil.  It's a trap, Martin!  Please don't 
walk into it.

Tiocfaidh #r l#,

Brian Kennedy 

-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|   For unique political commentary & Christian views        Rick Savage    | 
|     Anonymous FTP:  ftp.netcom.com  - pub/SF/SFA           PO Box 5251    |
|   To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file       Denver, CO 80217 |
|       In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help.                 (u)SA       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Wed Aug 30 16:05:50 PDT 1995
Article: 263195 of talk.politics.misc
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Impasse (IRA & Brits)
Message-ID: 
Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 18:35:33 GMT
Lines: 255
Sender: rsavage@netcom3.netcom.com

The Impasse 
(Commentary on Irish Republican Army & British Negotiations)
   by Brian Kennedy

      Irish Republicans are understandably frustrated at the current 
deadlock over the start of all-party talks. Those talks, in turn,  would 
(hopefully) lead to a negotiated settlement and permanent peace in a 
united Ireland. Ulster protestants would be a sizeable minority in a 
united Ireland; therefore, they would have to have guarantees of 
religious freedom for their people. That's clearly  understood.

     All the items listed above could certainly be worked out at the peace
table. Yet currently there is a roadblock in the way of Sinn Fein's 
approach to the peace table. Why?
     The decommissioning of IRA arms has been put forth by the Tory 
government as the roadblock to the peace conference. But that is a 
spurious issue.  The real impediment to the start of peace talks is the 
true nature of the British Empire; and that dual nature is dimly, if at 
all, understood by Irish Republicans.
     Let's take a look at it, shall we?
     First of all, no one should confuse the British Empire with the 
present-day government of England.  Governments come and go, but the 
British Empire ENDURES.  You might think of John Major's government as a 
small school of flying fish darting across the surface of the ocean, 
while a giant octopus (the British Empire) swims deeply below the school, 
shadowing its every move.  The school of flying fish is forced to swim 
completely on the ocean's surface, where it is battered by every wind, 
wave and storm that passes by. Also, the school of fish is almost 
completely at the mercy of its natural predators.  Birds can see it
>from  the air;  sharks can see it from below.
     The giant octopus has none of the problems that beset the fish.  
Because of its size, sharks and other predators are reluctant to attack 
it.  Because it swims so deeply, it is practically invisible from the 
surface of the ocean.  But any time it wants to, it can reach up with one 
of its tentacles and knock the school of flying fish senseless. The fish, 
in fact, will never even know what hit them.
     The tentacles of the British Empire, you must understand, are extremely
long.  They reach into every corner of the world.
     The next fiction that must be dispensed with is the idea that the 
British Empire disintegrated, mostly of its own weight,  after the end of 
World War II.  Today, it only survives in the six occupied counties of 
northern Ireland, the Falkland Islands, British Hong Kong (the nerve 
center of the international drug trade), and a few other small, scattered 
places.  That, at least, is the conventional wisdom.
     This is a lie, and a monstrous one.  It's so big, in fact, that it is
unrivalled in the whole history of propaganda.  And the fact that most 
of the world believes it to be true is a  tribute to how cleverly this 
ruse has been designed and executed.
     Conventional wisdom isn't worth a bucket of Margaret Thatcher's 
warm spit. If you want conventional wisdom, go read the doorstop of a 
book she wrote.
     What actually happened after World War II was this.  The rulers 
of the British Empire pulled down the Union Jack in almost every place it 
flew.  (In 1945, the British Empire covered one-fourth of the land 
surface of the earth.)  They did this in order to accomplish their real, 
constant, and  main objective: complete, total, and lasting world 
domination.  They realized that they could never conquer the world 
militarily and still hold it together by force of arms.  Uprisings, such 
as the ones in Ireland in 1798 and 1916, and in India in 1842, 1845, and 
1849, are inevitable under any system of overt rule.  That kind of 
suzerainty is always seen as oppressive by the native people who suffer 
under it.  They rightly resent it.
     Spiritual unity, however, was viewed as entirely possible, and as 
the next best alternative to direct rule from London.  So, the evil 
geniuses who control the British Empire decided to implement the 
alternative system: spiritual unity.  In plain English, spiritual unity 
entails brainwashing.
     You see, the banksters found out, many years ago, that a man with a 
chain around his ankle, who was forced to work as a slave, would never do 
any more work than he absolutely had to.  He perceived himself as a 
slave, and rightly so.  But if you took the chain off that same man's 
leg, and in its place gave him a master charge card  and a mortgage on a 
house that he thought he owned, his whole attitude would change.  He 
would actually break his back working to pay off the usurious debts those 
same bankers saddled him with.   
     The man in this example only traded his steel chain for an invisible 
one. Indeed, he is even more of a slave under the latter system than he 
was under the former, for now he has to buy his own clothing, his own 
food, his own shelter, and his own medical care.  But now, he has the 
illusion of freedom; and that makes him produce far more for the same 
usurers who exploited him in the original example.  The banksters didn't 
change at all, but the man changed drastically; and all of it was due to 
his changed perception of reality.
     The lesson is this: the overlords of the Bank of England put an 
awful lot of stock into how they are perceived by the laboring masses of 
men and women.  They do this because they know that the illusion of 
freedom, the covert system, works better than the older one, the overt 
system of outright slavery.
     This is why the modern-day British Empire always disguises itself 
under another name.  In the U.S., it calls itself "the new world 
order."   This was one of George Bush's favorite phrases, when he was 
president.  That fact should explain why he referred to England as Òthe 
mother countryÓ in a speech he made when he welcomed  Queen Elizabeth II 
to our shores several years ago.  George Bush is a traitor to his 
country.  His loyalty is to England, not to the U.S.  The only reason he 
hasn't been tried for treason, and hung for it, is that most Americans 
are still in the altered state of consciousness that the banksters
deem necessary to control the world's people. 
      All control nowadays is spiritual control.  That's an important point;
please keep it in mind.
     The Latin phrase novus ordo seclorum on the back of a U.S. one 
dollar bill could be translated as Ònew world order.Ó  The higher adepts 
of freemasonry, who put it there, have always understood its 
significance.  (Freemasonry has always been a British institution, ever 
since its founding in London in 1717.)  Now, so should you.
     Once you know how to look for the veiled identity of the British 
Empire, you will begin to see it almost everywhere.  The many disguises 
it dons will be dealt with quite extensively in a book this writer will 
publish on the internet shortly, under the title:  The Coming War With 
England.
     The very phrase "new world order" implies that an old world order 
exists; and, in fact, that is exactly the case.  The old world order 
refers to united Christendom, which reached it apogee in the thirteenth 
century.  Now, as then, it has been led by the Catholic Church.  The 
Catholic Church has always been the British Empire's most formidable 
foe.  All of the world's seemingly confusing events, and all of its 
apparent contradictions, can be grasped and understood once you begin to 
look at the constant war being waged, usually behind the scenes,  by the 
British Empire and the Catholic Church.  It is the pattern necessary to 
put all the pieces of the puzzle together.
     Both sides have many allies and numerous sub-groups -- almost too 
many to list.  The alliances have changed somewhat over the centuries, 
too.  But for now, just fix in your mind the identity of the main 
combatants: the British Empire and the Catholic Church, the new world 
order and the old world order.
     The current impasse in northern Ireland is a perfect example of how 
events are stage-managed behind the scenes by the mattoids of the British 
Empire.  After twenty-five years of relentless fighting, both sides have 
declared truces, and have looked to London to start peace talks.  London, 
however, constantly stalls by bringing up meaningless and spurious 
issues.  Why?
     The answer lies in the Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde nature of the British
Empire.  People only  look at the public face, the face of Henry 
Jekyll; and everything they see is the epitome of respectability.  John 
Major, Patrick Mayhew, et al. get all the press coverage, so people 
naturally assume that there is nothing else to the picture.
     Mr. Hyde, however, works only at night, unseen by most eyes.  He 
shuns all publicity, lest his crimes come to light.  But he controls Dr. 
Jekyll, even more completely than a ventriloquist controls his dummy.
     The stockholders of the Bank of England are rarely seen and almost 
never written about; but they control the destiny of the British Empire 
ABSOLUTELY.
     Irish Republican supporters should wake up to the fact that the real
British Empire -- the one that's hardly visible Ñ does not want peace.  
(If it did, there would be peace right now.)  The Neo-British Empire 
thrives on continued conflict.  This is how it manages its empire. It 
always sets up two sides to every conflict, and tries to manipulate both 
of them in the direction it desires.  (This is a pattern used over and 
over again, throughout the British Empire; it's not confined to the 
occupied six counties.  The current debacle in Bosnia has the exact same 
pattern, and the British Empire is behind all the bloodshed there, too.)  
That direction will always be towards a one-world government, with one 
religion, one darker-colored race, and most importantly, one mindset.  
The evil rulers of the Neo-British Empire know that once people begin to 
think as one, they will act as one.  And once people have been 
successfully maneuvered into that zombie-like mental state, they can be 
taught to never rebel against their masters. (This is the real reason 
behind all the ecumenical, one-world garbage you are so constantly 
bombarded with. It is designed to make you a willing slave of the "new 
world order," a/k/a the Neo-British Empire.  One thing is certain: it 
does NOT come from any altruistic motives.)  The Rothschilds, Cecils, and 
Mountbattens KNOW that the only lasting form of conquest is spiritual and 
psychological in nature.
     People in northern Ireland, as in Bosnia,  South Africa, and 
elsewhere, are not yet in the desired state of mental uniformity.  This 
is why the world we see around us never experiences any cease to war and 
conflict.  The common people (the masses) have not been beaten down 
enough yet!  The British Empire plan is to exhaust both sides in every 
conflict so completely that both  will turn to the proferred solution 
>from  sheer desperation and exhaustion. Like the old Pax Romana, the new 
world order's Pax Britannica will look tranquil on the surface, but will 
be seething with rebellion underneath.  That's one reason the Irish 
Republican struggle has lasted so long.  It is being studied, and 
carefully, in order to develop blueprints for coping with any resistance 
to the "new world order."  The Draconian measures used against Sinn 
Feiners in the occupied six counties will probably be imported to the 
United States in the near future -- all in the name of combatting 
"terrorism," of course.
     The Catholic Church, as you might guess, is well aware of the 
Neo-British Empire's plan; and like its mortal adversary, the papacy 
looks at events from an extremely high vantage point.  Its view of world 
events spans centuries.  It takes a long-range view of things, and as a 
result does not get bogged down in solving every immediate conflict.  The 
papacy can afford to wait. Also, the Catholic Church is extremely 
secretive about its affairs -- especially its financial empire.
     In brief, this is why Irish Republicans will not see peace in 
Ireland any time soon.  The Pax Britannica, if it comes at all, will not 
occur until after World War III has taken place -- and that hasn't even 
started yet.  (It has, however, been planned in advance for many, many 
years Ñ just like all other modern wars have been.)  
     The men in Sinn Fein should realize, if they haven't already, that 
they are only pawns in a much larger chess game.  The stakes are quite 
high: spiritual and temporal control of the entire world.  It is time for 
Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness to step outside of the little grove of 
trees they're in and take a look at the whole forest.  They should 
realize that they are guinea pigs in a bloody and gruesome social 
experiment (just as the protestants are).  The British Empire will spill 
every drop of blood it has to, in order to accomplish its objective -- 
complete world domination.  The Rothschilds and the Cecils couldn't care 
less about what happens in Ireland, or Bosnia, or anyplace else.  Like 
the Rockefeller, Harriman and Bush families in our own country, these 
people are mattoids Ñ supremely evil persons.  What you and I call a 
war, they call an urban renewal project.  What we call murder, they call 
necessary population reduction.  They looked at the Irish potato famine 
the same way we would look at pruning some fruit trees in our back 
yards.  These are the kind of people we are up against.
     What, then, is the answer?  The leaders of Sinn F#in should realize 
that Mayhew and Major are mere political marionettes, who only dance to 
the music their John Bull puppeteers pick out for them.  "He who pays the 
piper, calls the tune"  should be understood by anyone.  All politicians, 
in any country, are beholden to the people who finance their campaigns Ñ 
the bankers.  John Major began his working career as a teller in a 
Rothschild bank.  Any one who thinks Mr. Major is anything more than the 
head teller, today, is simply naive.
     Start doing what investigative reporters have always done Ñ follow the
money trail.
     The only reason Sinn Fein was even able to have the secret talks 
that led up to the Downing St. Declaration was because of the April 1992 
bomb in front of the Baltic Exchange building.  That location is only a 
short distance away from the Bank of England -- "the Old Lady of 
Threadneedle Street."  Lord Rothschild's bank is the real nerve center of 
the Neo-British Empire.  The mattoids who run the NBE had a very close 
call in 1992 -- too close for their comfort, in fact.
     In brief, there will be no progress toward peace in Ireland, 
Bosnia, or anyplace else until the evil geniuses who control the 
Neo-British Empire are given an incentive to want peace, rather than 
war.  Lord Rothschild and his despicable cronies profit greatly from 
war.  His family, like the queen's, have profited from every other war in 
the last 300 years.  (The Bank of England was founded in 1694.)  If peace 
were to come, his profits would go  down considerably.
     This is the crux of the problem.  The solutions, albeit tentative, 
will be covered in The Coming War With England, which will be released to 
the internet in numerous sites shortly, including IRL-NEWS.
       Irish Republican supporters around the world  would be well 
advised to avail themselves of these excellent research tools.  Remember, 
we need solutions -- BADLY.  The current impasse is certainly nothing new; 
but it can  be overcome if we put enough brainpower into the effort.  
This short essay has, necessarily, only touched on the highlights (or, 
perhaps, you might more correctly call them lowlights) to make you all 
aware of the magnitude of the problem.
       It is time for many of us to expand our horizons.  Let's start 
looking at the things the queen, the freemasons, and the other British 
Empire Benedict Arnolds don't want us to look at.  I say that's where the 
solution will lie.
       What do you think?


                                    Ñ      Tiocfaidh  #r  l#,
                                                Brian Kennedy.

-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|   For unique political commentary & Christian views        Rick Savage    | 
|     Anonymous FTP:  ftp.netcom.com  - pub/SF/SFA           PO Box 5251    |
|   To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file       Denver, CO 80217 |
|       In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help.                 (u)SA       |

Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor