From rsavage@netcom.com Fri Jun  9 04:27:20 PDT 1995
Article: 65123 of alt.conspiracy
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!torn!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!noc.netcom.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Militia defined - ATC Dictionary
Message-ID: 
Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 1995 17:03:05 GMT
Lines: 61
Sender: rsavage@netcom17.netcom.com


From: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
--------------------------------
 
AntiThought-Control DICTIONARY --  A Guide to Deceptive Words and Terms 
Used to Neutralize the common man.

TERRORIST
   AS USED BY GOVERNMENT:  Anyone who violently resists or reacts against 
the government, especially by surprise counter measures - suually an 
Arab, a White Supremacist, or a Patriot.  Acts of violence against the 
government are acts against the citizenry as a whole..
   ACTUAL MEANING:  One who uses violence or the threat of violence to 
intimidate or coerce, especially for political reasons.  Members of 
central governmetns (the true terrorists), from the top down, use this 
term to label anyone, or any group, that protests against government 
opproession.  Groups or nations too small to have their own military and 
air force are labeled "terrorists" when they fight against being raped by 
government.
   Central governments terrorize the people by threats, intimidations, 
robbery, and brutalization.  This is true terrorism.  Those who speak or 
act against government terrorism are conter-labeled "terrorists" by 
politicians and lackeys in the media.  Terrorist-type incidents are 
commonly orchestrated by government intelligence (CIA, FBI, ATF, etc.) by 
agents infiltrating local protest groups, inciting one or more of the 
weak-minded ones to "help them" do something immoral or illegal -- like 
planting a bomb.  Afterwards, the agents conviently disappear, the blame 
is aimed at all protestors, the police and media follow their scripts 
handed down to them, and the incident is used as an excuse to pass more 
laws to increase police powers.


What is the Anti-Thought Control Dictionary?
   People can be controlled if their thoughts can be controlled.  
Since words are thoughts in physical form, they can become 
manipulative tools for controlling thoughts and thereby change the 
way people think about certain things.  To accomplish this, the 
controllers only need to change the MEANINGS of important 
words to fit their particular political view, and invent NEW 
EMOTIONALLY-CHARGED TERMS to keep us confused and 
ignorant.
   Eventually, all important words said by anyone will 
automatically convey the controllers biased political/religious 
view.  At this point it will become increasingly difficult for the 
opposition to construct an effective opposing argument because 
the words being used have been changed, defused, and/or made 
unpopular.
   If we carelessly acquiesce to meaning changes in this war of 
words, then we will become _thought-controlled people_.  
However, if we constantly define words, terms and phrases and 
insist others give us their definitions, we can frustrate their attempts
to control our mind and spirit.
 
Get the complete dictionary by FTP from:
   ftp.netcom.com  pub/SF/SFA

-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|   For unique political commentary & Christian views        Rick Savage    | 
|     Anonymous FTP:  ftp.netcom.com  - pub/SF/SFA           PO Box 5251    |
|   To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file       Denver, CO 80217 |
|       In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help.                 (u)SA       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Fri Jun  9 07:03:58 PDT 1995
Article: 5542 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!info.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!noc.netcom.net!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Militias Defined - ATC Dictionary
Message-ID: 
Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 1995 17:25:06 GMT
Lines: 60
Sender: rsavage@netcom17.netcom.com

From: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
--------------------------------
 
AntiThought-Control DICTIONARY --  A Guide to Deceptive Words and Terms 
Used to Neutralize the common man.

TERRORIST
   AS USED BY GOVERNMENT:  Anyone who violently resists or reacts against 
the government, especially by surprise counter measures - suually an 
Arab, a White Supremacist, or a Patriot.  Acts of violence against the 
government are acts against the citizenry as a whole..
   ACTUAL MEANING:  One who uses violence or the threat of violence to 
intimidate or coerce, especially for political reasons.  Members of 
central governmetns (the true terrorists), from the top down, use this 
term to label anyone, or any group, that protests against government 
opproession.  Groups or nations too small to have their own military and 
air force are labeled "terrorists" when they fight against being raped by 
government.
   Central governments terrorize the people by threats, intimidations, 
robbery, and brutalization.  This is true terrorism.  Those who speak or 
act against government terrorism are conter-labeled "terrorists" by 
politicians and lackeys in the media.  Terrorist-type incidents are 
commonly orchestrated by government intelligence (CIA, FBI, ATF, etc.) by 
agents infiltrating local protest groups, inciting one or more of the 
weak-minded ones to "help them" do something immoral or illegal -- like 
planting a bomb.  Afterwards, the agents conviently disappear, the blame 
is aimed at all protestors, the police and media follow their scripts 
handed down to them, and the incident is used as an excuse to pass more 
laws to increase police powers.


What is the Anti-Thought Control Dictionary?
   People can be controlled if their thoughts can be controlled.  
Since words are thoughts in physical form, they can become 
manipulative tools for controlling thoughts and thereby change the 
way people think about certain things.  To accomplish this, the 
controllers only need to change the MEANINGS of important 
words to fit their particular political view, and invent NEW 
EMOTIONALLY-CHARGED TERMS to keep us confused and 
ignorant.
   Eventually, all important words said by anyone will 
automatically convey the controllers biased political/religious 
view.  At this point it will become increasingly difficult for the 
opposition to construct an effective opposing argument because 
the words being used have been changed, defused, and/or made 
unpopular.
   If we carelessly acquiesce to meaning changes in this war of 
words, then we will become _thought-controlled people_.  
However, if we constantly define words, terms and phrases and 
insist others give us their definitions, we can frustrate their attempts
to control our mind and spirit.
 
Get the complete dictionary by FTP from:
   ftp.netcom.com  pub/SF/SFA

-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|   For unique political commentary & Christian views        Rick Savage    | 
|     Anonymous FTP:  ftp.netcom.com  - pub/SF/SFA           PO Box 5251    |
|   To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file       Denver, CO 80217 |
|       In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help.                 (u)SA       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Fri Jun  9 21:38:01 PDT 1995
Article: 5542 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!info.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!noc.netcom.net!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Militias Defined - ATC Dictionary
Message-ID: 
Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 1995 17:25:06 GMT
Lines: 60
Sender: rsavage@netcom17.netcom.com

From: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
--------------------------------
 
AntiThought-Control DICTIONARY --  A Guide to Deceptive Words and Terms 
Used to Neutralize the common man.

TERRORIST
   AS USED BY GOVERNMENT:  Anyone who violently resists or reacts against 
the government, especially by surprise counter measures - suually an 
Arab, a White Supremacist, or a Patriot.  Acts of violence against the 
government are acts against the citizenry as a whole..
   ACTUAL MEANING:  One who uses violence or the threat of violence to 
intimidate or coerce, especially for political reasons.  Members of 
central governmetns (the true terrorists), from the top down, use this 
term to label anyone, or any group, that protests against government 
opproession.  Groups or nations too small to have their own military and 
air force are labeled "terrorists" when they fight against being raped by 
government.
   Central governments terrorize the people by threats, intimidations, 
robbery, and brutalization.  This is true terrorism.  Those who speak or 
act against government terrorism are conter-labeled "terrorists" by 
politicians and lackeys in the media.  Terrorist-type incidents are 
commonly orchestrated by government intelligence (CIA, FBI, ATF, etc.) by 
agents infiltrating local protest groups, inciting one or more of the 
weak-minded ones to "help them" do something immoral or illegal -- like 
planting a bomb.  Afterwards, the agents conviently disappear, the blame 
is aimed at all protestors, the police and media follow their scripts 
handed down to them, and the incident is used as an excuse to pass more 
laws to increase police powers.


What is the Anti-Thought Control Dictionary?
   People can be controlled if their thoughts can be controlled.  
Since words are thoughts in physical form, they can become 
manipulative tools for controlling thoughts and thereby change the 
way people think about certain things.  To accomplish this, the 
controllers only need to change the MEANINGS of important 
words to fit their particular political view, and invent NEW 
EMOTIONALLY-CHARGED TERMS to keep us confused and 
ignorant.
   Eventually, all important words said by anyone will 
automatically convey the controllers biased political/religious 
view.  At this point it will become increasingly difficult for the 
opposition to construct an effective opposing argument because 
the words being used have been changed, defused, and/or made 
unpopular.
   If we carelessly acquiesce to meaning changes in this war of 
words, then we will become _thought-controlled people_.  
However, if we constantly define words, terms and phrases and 
insist others give us their definitions, we can frustrate their attempts
to control our mind and spirit.
 
Get the complete dictionary by FTP from:
   ftp.netcom.com  pub/SF/SFA

-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|   For unique political commentary & Christian views        Rick Savage    | 
|     Anonymous FTP:  ftp.netcom.com  - pub/SF/SFA           PO Box 5251    |
|   To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file       Denver, CO 80217 |
|       In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help.                 (u)SA       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Sat Jun 10 10:41:20 PDT 1995
Article: 150915 of talk.politics.guns
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns
Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!Sunserver.insinc.net!news.sprintlink.net!noc.netcom.net!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Militias Defined - ATC Dictionary
Message-ID: 
Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 1995 17:35:57 GMT
Lines: 60
Sender: rsavage@netcom17.netcom.com

From: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
--------------------------------
 
AntiThought-Control DICTIONARY --  A Guide to Deceptive Words and Terms 
Used to Neutralize the common man.

TERRORIST
   AS USED BY GOVERNMENT:  Anyone who violently resists or reacts against 
the government, especially by surprise counter measures - suually an 
Arab, a White Supremacist, or a Patriot.  Acts of violence against the 
government are acts against the citizenry as a whole..
   ACTUAL MEANING:  One who uses violence or the threat of violence to 
intimidate or coerce, especially for political reasons.  Members of 
central governmetns (the true terrorists), from the top down, use this 
term to label anyone, or any group, that protests against government 
opproession.  Groups or nations too small to have their own military and 
air force are labeled "terrorists" when they fight against being raped by 
government.
   Central governments terrorize the people by threats, intimidations, 
robbery, and brutalization.  This is true terrorism.  Those who speak or 
act against government terrorism are conter-labeled "terrorists" by 
politicians and lackeys in the media.  Terrorist-type incidents are 
commonly orchestrated by government intelligence (CIA, FBI, ATF, etc.) by 
agents infiltrating local protest groups, inciting one or more of the 
weak-minded ones to "help them" do something immoral or illegal -- like 
planting a bomb.  Afterwards, the agents conviently disappear, the blame 
is aimed at all protestors, the police and media follow their scripts 
handed down to them, and the incident is used as an excuse to pass more 
laws to increase police powers.


What is the Anti-Thought Control Dictionary?
   People can be controlled if their thoughts can be controlled.  
Since words are thoughts in physical form, they can become 
manipulative tools for controlling thoughts and thereby change the 
way people think about certain things.  To accomplish this, the 
controllers only need to change the MEANINGS of important 
words to fit their particular political view, and invent NEW 
EMOTIONALLY-CHARGED TERMS to keep us confused and 
ignorant.
   Eventually, all important words said by anyone will 
automatically convey the controllers biased political/religious 
view.  At this point it will become increasingly difficult for the 
opposition to construct an effective opposing argument because 
the words being used have been changed, defused, and/or made 
unpopular.
   If we carelessly acquiesce to meaning changes in this war of 
words, then we will become _thought-controlled people_.  
However, if we constantly define words, terms and phrases and 
insist others give us their definitions, we can frustrate their attempts
to control our mind and spirit.
 
Get the complete dictionary by FTP from:
   ftp.netcom.com  pub/SF/SFA

-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|   For unique political commentary & Christian views        Rick Savage    | 
|     Anonymous FTP:  ftp.netcom.com  - pub/SF/SFA           PO Box 5251    |
|   To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file       Denver, CO 80217 |
|       In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help.                 (u)SA       |


From rs241@delphi.com Sat Jun 10 14:21:54 PDT 1995
Article: 22032 of alt.revisionism
Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!info.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news2.near.net!news.delphi.com!usenet
From: rs241@delphi.com
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Holocaust Almanac - I.G. Farben removed 'indicator' from gas
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 95 19:57:41 -0500
Organization: Delphi (info@delphi.com email, 800-695-4005 voice)
Lines: 73
Message-ID: 
References: <1995Jun01.110003.3187@oneb.almanac.bc.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bos1f.delphi.com
X-To: Ken Mcvay 

 
 
 
>      In the past the S.S. had bought moderate amounts of Zyklon B from
>      Degesch as a vermin control in its concentration camps. When the
>      Final Solution added Jews to the S.S. extermination plans, Degesch
>      profits reflected the new prosperity. I.G.'s dividends on its
>      Degesch investment for the years 1942, 1943, and 1944 were double
>      those of 1940 and 1941.     European Jews. Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1961. 568; NG-2586-E.>
 
 
 
Was the sum total of 1942, 1943 and 1944 double to the sum total for
1940 and 1941, or was each year (1942, 1943, 1944) double to each year
of 1940 and 1941.  What evidence is there that the SS was the solely
responsible for the doubling of these profits?  I would suspect that
the SS increased its personnel during the latter years.  There were
only eight Waffen SS units of divisional strength raised toward the
end of 1942; between 1943 and 1945 thirty more units were raised although
less then half were of divisional strength (pages 156-159 Waffen SS,
John Keegan).  I can only guess that the other branches of the SS
increased their personnel as well, since they had captured an enormous
amount of Soviet prisoners.
 
 
 
 
>      There was still another episode that gave the officials of Degesch
>      more than a hint of the dread purpose to which their Zyklon B was
>      being put by the S.S. When manufactured as a pesticide Zyklon B
>      contained a special odor, or 'indicator,' to warn human beings of
>      its lethal presence. The inclusion of such a warning odor was
>      required by German law. When the S.S. demanded that the new,
>      large order of Zyklon B omit the 'indicator,' no one familiar with
>      the workings of the S.S. could have failed to realize the purpose
>      behind the strange request. The Degesch executives at first were
 
 
 
Which branch of the SS made the request?  According to page 571 of Raul
Hilberg's book, a person by the name of Mrugowski made the request for
the Waffen-SS without the odor indicator.  What evidence is there that
this request was shipped to Auschwitz and (or) that this request was
approved?  On the same paragraph of Dr. Hilberg's book, there was a
request for 2800 kg. by Dr. Evers who had it shipped to Auschwitz.
There is no way of determining whether or not this shipment had the
odor indicator based on this sentence by Professor Hilberg, but I
believe it did include an indicator.
 
 
 
>   It seems clear to me that if, as the denial set maintains, the S.S.
>   only used Zyklon B for insect control, they would most certainly not
>   have wished to remove the only warning device available to their men
>   working with the deadly gas in the field. The lice, after all,
>   wouldn't care one way or the other. It also seems clear that the only
>   conceivable reason to remove the indicator odor would be to disguise
>   the killing agent from the victims - Zyklon B would have been
>   odorless without that indicator. In short, it shows clear intent,
>   thus shattering yet another denial myth - that there was no organized
>   plan to exterminate anyone.
 
 
 
If the victims were in a locked and airtight room, it wouldn't matter
whether or not there was an odor indicator.  If the SS was concerned
about keeping this as secret as possible, they would have ordered the
product in the usual manner.
 
 
 
 


From rsavage@netcom.com Sat Jun 10 21:07:45 PDT 1995
Article: 5542 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!info.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!noc.netcom.net!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Militias Defined - ATC Dictionary
Message-ID: 
Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 1995 17:25:06 GMT
Lines: 60
Sender: rsavage@netcom17.netcom.com

From: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
--------------------------------
 
AntiThought-Control DICTIONARY --  A Guide to Deceptive Words and Terms 
Used to Neutralize the common man.

TERRORIST
   AS USED BY GOVERNMENT:  Anyone who violently resists or reacts against 
the government, especially by surprise counter measures - suually an 
Arab, a White Supremacist, or a Patriot.  Acts of violence against the 
government are acts against the citizenry as a whole..
   ACTUAL MEANING:  One who uses violence or the threat of violence to 
intimidate or coerce, especially for political reasons.  Members of 
central governmetns (the true terrorists), from the top down, use this 
term to label anyone, or any group, that protests against government 
opproession.  Groups or nations too small to have their own military and 
air force are labeled "terrorists" when they fight against being raped by 
government.
   Central governments terrorize the people by threats, intimidations, 
robbery, and brutalization.  This is true terrorism.  Those who speak or 
act against government terrorism are conter-labeled "terrorists" by 
politicians and lackeys in the media.  Terrorist-type incidents are 
commonly orchestrated by government intelligence (CIA, FBI, ATF, etc.) by 
agents infiltrating local protest groups, inciting one or more of the 
weak-minded ones to "help them" do something immoral or illegal -- like 
planting a bomb.  Afterwards, the agents conviently disappear, the blame 
is aimed at all protestors, the police and media follow their scripts 
handed down to them, and the incident is used as an excuse to pass more 
laws to increase police powers.


What is the Anti-Thought Control Dictionary?
   People can be controlled if their thoughts can be controlled.  
Since words are thoughts in physical form, they can become 
manipulative tools for controlling thoughts and thereby change the 
way people think about certain things.  To accomplish this, the 
controllers only need to change the MEANINGS of important 
words to fit their particular political view, and invent NEW 
EMOTIONALLY-CHARGED TERMS to keep us confused and 
ignorant.
   Eventually, all important words said by anyone will 
automatically convey the controllers biased political/religious 
view.  At this point it will become increasingly difficult for the 
opposition to construct an effective opposing argument because 
the words being used have been changed, defused, and/or made 
unpopular.
   If we carelessly acquiesce to meaning changes in this war of 
words, then we will become _thought-controlled people_.  
However, if we constantly define words, terms and phrases and 
insist others give us their definitions, we can frustrate their attempts
to control our mind and spirit.
 
Get the complete dictionary by FTP from:
   ftp.netcom.com  pub/SF/SFA

-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|   For unique political commentary & Christian views        Rick Savage    | 
|     Anonymous FTP:  ftp.netcom.com  - pub/SF/SFA           PO Box 5251    |
|   To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file       Denver, CO 80217 |
|       In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help.                 (u)SA       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Sun Jun 18 15:48:50 PDT 1995
Article: 22301 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!Sunserver.insinc.net!news.Direct.CA!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: This Age of Conflict
Message-ID: 
Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 05:09:56 GMT
Lines: 1045
Sender: rsavage@netcom12.netcom.com

From: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA/history
----

THIS AGE OF CONFLICT
By Ivor Benson

ABOUT THE WRITER:  Ivor Benson is a former South African
and Fleet Street, London, journalist;  South African Broadcasting
Corporation news analyst and commentator 1963/64; Information
Adviser to Ian Smith's Rhodesian Front Government 1964/65;
political analyst and author of several books, he has traveled widely.

      Who controls the past controls the future; 
      who controls the present controls the past 
         - George Orwell

      It is almost a joke now in the Western world, in the 20th 
   century, to use words like 'good and 'evil'.  They have become 
   almost old-fashioned concepts, but they are very real and genuine 
   concepts. These are concepts from a sphere which is higher than
   us.  And instead of getting involved in base, petty, short-sighted
   political calculations and games. we have to recognize that the
   concentration of world Evil and the tremendous force of hatred is
   there and it's flowing from there  throughout the world. And we
   have to stand up against it and not hasten to give to it, give to it,
   give to it, every-thing that it wants to swallow.
      - Alexander Solzhenitsyn.

PART 1

THIS AGE OF CONFLICT

Knowledge can be of two kinds: knowledge of the world outside 
ourselves, the macrocosm, and knowledge of the kingdom within, 
the microcosm, both of them boundless.

The better we know ourselves, the easier it will be to know the 
world; alternatively, the better we know the world, so much easier it 
will be to know ourselves and our deepest and most enduring 
needs.

It is not more and more knowledge that we need for the purpose of 
strengthening our position as individuals, but only knowledge of a 
kind that holds together and makes sense. We need a coherent 
interpretation of the history of the age in which we live and an 
insight into what it is that we must have if we are to be physically 
well and in good spirits.

The following paragraph from a book by three university historians, 
published in 1949, will serve as a starting point for an exploration 
of what they describe as "this age of conflict":

   Two world wars and their intervening wars, revolutions and
   crises are now generally recognized to be episodes in a single
   age of conflict which began in 191l and has not yet run its
   course. It is an age that has brought to the world more change
   and tragedy than any other in recorded history. Yet, whatever
   may be its ultimate meaning and consequence, we can already
   think of it and write of it as a HISTORIC WHOLE.  (1) 
   (Emphasis added). 

An age of conflict that must be thought of  "as a whole" must also  
be capable of being explained and understood as a whole; therefore, 
it is a highly condensed and simplified synopsis of the history of 
our century that we must have if the seemingly interminable 
succession of "episodes" of conflict and tragedy is to be seen as a 
whole and understood.

The method I have chosen is to begin with a list of categorical 
statements which can be developed and expanded later and 
supported with an extensive bibliography. Here they are:

1.  Our century of conflict is the product of an alliance of money 
    and intellect, with intellect almost .invariably subordinate to,
    and at the service of, money; money being in the 20th century the
    primary source of great power.

2.  We need to fill and identify the changes which have occurred in 
    the realms of money and of intellect, changes which have made this 
    century so different from all others in recorded history.

3.  The change which has occurred in the realm of money is this: 
    Constellations of finance-capitalism which had been separate and 
    nationally oriented were absorbed into a greater constellation of 
    finance-capitalism serving a different set of long-term interests.

4.  The change which occurred in the realm of intellect is this: 
    Christian orthodoxy was replaced by an ideology of socialism as 
    the basis of a consensus intellectual frame of reference and
    system of values. This socialism or secular religion has given
    rise to what the psychologists Carl Gustav Jung has described
    as a "psychic epidemic" now afflicting the educated classes in
    the West.

5.  The changes which heralded our century of conflict were first 
    clearly visible in South Africa in the late 1890s, producing
    the Anglo-Boer war (the first of three great fratricidal wars
    in the west), the beginning of the end of the British Empire
    and the beginning of a new and unprecedented kind of world
    imperium - money- powered, race-oriented, Zionist national-
    socialist.

6.  These changes in money and intellect have drawn the peoples of  
    the West into a dialectical trap, with money as thesis, socialism
    as antithesis and the new imperium as synthesis; money
    incessantly concentrates power, socialism promises the total 
    dispersal and distribution of power; the resolution of this
    contradiction supplies the new imperium with its dynamic.

7.  The process of the transference of financial power to the new 
    imperium was only completed in the 1930s when J.P. Morgan and 
    the great American pioneering families lost their dominance
    in Wall Street.

8.  The immediate cause of the great increase in conflict all over the 
    world: External interference with the natural hierarchical system
    or "pecking order" WITHIN AND AMONG ethnic groups, as 
    everywhere states were set up, and regimes established, which
    have no local or NATURAL  right to exist. This interference by
    third parties is what makes episodes of conflict in the 20th
    century quite different from conflicts in other ages, conferring
    on all of them a shared meaning. 9.  All these developments are
    linked to the moral evil of a system of money creation and debt
    in which the nations of the West are at the same time offenders
    and victims.


We can think of our age of conflict as a historic whole, but what 
reason do we have to believe that it is the product of a uniform and 
continuous set of identifiable causes?

Students of history can provide innumerable examples of major 
influences, baffling to all at the time of their occurrence, which 
yielded finally to quite simple elucidation and explanation.

It is not only in history that events widely separated in space and 
time can be found to have. a combined meaning; for example, a few 
years ago when over a period of many months there were visitations 
of freak weather all around the world, in many cases with disastrous 
consequences the meteorologists were soon able to trace them all to 
a single cause or set of causes: they were able at least to show that 
the storms, floods, hurricanes, droughts, etc, belonged together and 
had an intelligible combined meaning.  Needless to say, the 
meteorologists were not hindered in their investigations by "no-go" 
areas of inquiry of the kind to be expected by those who seek to 
understand worldwide visitations of freak political weather.

We have no reason to suppose that we shall find an explanation of 
our age (lf conflict as easy to present and understand as spells of 
freak weather, but we are encouraged to hope that where we see in 
many parts of the globe, over many decades, a recognizable pattern 
of evil consequences, we can expect to find evidence of a uniform 
pattern of causes.  What is required is an interpretation of the history 
of our century which will explain and render mutually intelligible 
the major changes which have occurred - those changes which 
brought more conflict and tragedy than ever before in recorded 
history. Among the few books of history in which any attempt has 
been made to interpret the history of our century as a whole are 
Oswald Spengler's THE DECLINE OF THE WEST and Carroll 
Quigley's TRAGEDY AND HOPE.

Spengler's main contribution to historiography is his theory of the 
morphology of history in which he assigns to our present 
civilization in the West a condition of irreversible decline. 
Paradoxically, he does not regard this as a pessimistic view. One 
fact emerges very clearly in Spengler's analysis: What has 
happened in the 20th century must be seen and studied as an 
alliance of money and intellect with money, rather than pure politics, 
as the main moving power in world affairs. 

 Quigley leaves many things unexplained - he may have done so 
intentionally - but he supports with a good deal of documentary 
evidence the thesis that much of what has happened in our century 
has been deliberately MADE TO HAPPEN.  What he offers is, in 
fact, a conspiratorial theory of history involving a number of secret 
and semi-secret organizations like the Rhodes Scholarship Trust, 
the Round Table movement, the Royal Institute of' International 
Affairs and the American Council on Foreign Relations, all under 
the umbrella of what he calls an "Anglo-American network" of 
businessman, educationists, politicians and journalists. 

Quigley, who was Professor of History and of International 
Relations at the Georgetown Foreign Service School, Washington 
DC, supplies much other well documented information which no 
one has yet tried to fit into a general inter-interpretation  of the 
history of our century. TRAGEDY AND HOPE was hastily 
withdrawn by its publishers, the Macmillan Company, arguably 
because it was found to have contributed too much to a fully 
coherent interpretation of the history of our century - to the 
embarrassment of those who prefer to work under a cloak of 
secrecy.

The theory that much of what has happened has been made to 
happen is further endorsed by another consensus historian, Arnold 
Toynbee, not in his monumental A STUDY OF HISTORY but in 
his other public utterances, of which the following is an example, 
>from  a paper read at the Fourth Annual Conference of the Institute 
for the Scientific Study of International Relations at Copenhagen in 
June 1931 (published in INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, December 
1931): 

   We are at present working discreetly but with all our
   might, to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty
   out of the clutches of the local national states of our
   world. And all the time we are denying with our lips what
   we are doing with our hands, because to impugn the
   sovereignty of the local national states of the world is
   still a heresy for which a statesman or a publicist can 
   be, perhaps not quite burnt at the stake, but certainly
   ostracized and discredited.

Quite clearly, the denudation of the national states of much of their 
sovereignty during the 20th century represented for Quigley and 
Toynbee part of the progressive fulfillment of their ideal of an 
elaborately planned "brave new world" to be raised on the flattened 
ruins of the old - for Quigley a world of  "hope" with which to 
replace a world of "tragedy, a world of planned revolutionary 
change to replace a disorderly world of slow revolutionary change.

Where and when did this age of conflict begin? The three co-
authors quoted above say that it began in 1914. with World War I; 
but there are good reasons to believe that it began with the Anglo-
Boer War of 1898-1902, which we can now see quite clearly as the 
beginning of the end of the British world imperium and as marking 
the inauguration of another imperium of a mysterious kind.

If our century of conflict can be said to have begun with the Anglo-
Boer War, then it is in South Africa that we may have the best 
chance of seeing more clearly the crucial historical change that was 
to spark off a great chain reaction of change involving the whole 
world.

Until that time the record of the British Empire had been one of 
continuous progress, marred only by the hiving off of the American 
colonies. Britain had out paced all rivals in last century's scramble 
for colonial possessions, and could boast by the turn of the century 
to possess an "empire on which the sun never set".

However, by a mere accident of history, Afrikaners - Boers, as they 
were called  - who had trekked from Britain's Cape Colony into 
South Africa's virtually unpopulated hinterland, suddenly found 
themselves to be the owners of the world's richest gold fields.  The 
eagerness of race-nationalists like Cecil John Rhodes and Alfred 
Milner to add the new Boer Republic of the Transvaal to the British 
Empire is understandable.  In the climate of thought and sentiment 
then prevailing, not to have tried to grab so valuable a prize would 
have been virtually unthinkable. 

After a war that proved unexpectedly costly both in lives and 
money, Britain succeeded in adding to its empire both the Transvaal 
and its ally in the struggle, the Orange Free State republic, but all 
this happened in circumstances mysteriously different from those 
that had attended all previous imperial conquests.  It was a war over 
which the British people were themselves sharply divided until the 
first shots were fired by the Boers; it was a war against which the 
British Government had been sternly warned by one of the empire's 
most loyal servants, General Sir William Butler, then Commander-
in-Chief of British forces in South Africa; it was a war which gave 
rise to a greater outpouring of false communication than any other 
in British colonial history.

There was something decidedly different about this tempting 
opportunity for further imperial expansion, which that prominent 
writer J.A. Hobson explained thus in his book THE WAR IN 
SOUTH AFRICA, while that war was still in progress.

   "We are fighting in order to place a small international
   oligarchy of mine-owners and speculators in power in
   Pretoria. Englishmen would do well to recognize that the
   economic and political destinies of South Africa are,
   and seem likely to remain, in the hands of men most of
   whom are foreigners by origin whose trade is finance
   and whose trade interests are not British".

There can be no doubt today about the correctness of that 
assessment. Thomas Pakenham, in his book, THE BOAR WAR, 
published in 1979, has this to say about the causes of that war:

   "First there is a thin golden thread woven by the
   'gold bugs', the Rand millionaires who controlled the
   richest mines in the world. It has been hitherto assumed
   by historians that none of the 'gold bugs' was directly
   concerned in making the war. But directly concerned they 
   were ... I have found evidence of an informal alliance
   between Sir Alfred Milner, the High Commissioner, and
   the firm of Wernher-Beit, the dominant Rand mining
   house. IT WAS THIS ALLIANCE, I BELIEVE, THAT GAVE MILNER
   THE STRENGTH TO PRECIPITATE THE WAR"  (Emphasis added).

Hobson devotes an entire chapter of his book to mine-ownership in 
the Transvaal. A few of the financial pioneers were Englishmen; he 
names among these Rhodes, Rudd and J.B. Robinson. These had 
all made their fortunes in South Africa, but the others, "the small 
group of international financiers, chiefly German in origin and 
Jewish in race", were wealthy when they arrived in the country and 
had access to seemingly boundless funds in Europe, including the 
German Dresdner Bank, which Hobson believed to be largely 
owned by Wernher and Beit. Rhodes, too, had to go to an
international banking dynasty, the London Rothschilds, for
money with which to buy out his rivals and gain complete 
control of the diamond industry in Kimberley.

General Sir William Butler was even more emphatic about the 
sources of power and motivation which were decisive in 
precipitating the war, "the train-layers setting the political 
gunpowder, as he called them. In a despatch to the War Office in 
June 1899 he wrote:

   "If the Jews were out of the question, it would be
   easy enough to come to an agreement, but they are
   apparently intent upon plunging the country into civil
   strife ... indications are too evident here to allow 
   one to doubt the existence of strong undercurrents, the 
   movers of which are bent upon war at all costs for
   their own selfish ends." (4)

Noticed by few, and by even fewer understood, effective control of 
the British Empire at a decisive point in history had passed, if only 
momentarily, out of essentially British hands. Or, to put it 
differently, the center of gravity of real power in the world had 
shifted significantly. That was the mysterious change that was to 
inaugurate a chain reaction of more change, first for the British 
Empire and then for the whole world. More precisely, it was the 
first clear sign of the commencement of a process of change in the 
realm of finance-capitalism which was not to be complete before the 
middle of the 1930s.

Other changes are less readily noticeable, one of the most important 
of these being radical changes in the methodology of warfare - the 
human mind itself has become a battleground for warring interests 
as never before in recorded history. Political warfare - \/on 
Clausewitz's "war by other means" - there has always been but 
never before on the scale practiced after the turn of the century.  
Persuasion there always was as a means of readying a population 
for war; but the world was to encounter in the late 1890s something 
unprecedented in the quantity and audacity of the lying propaganda 
that was used in drawing the British people into the Anglo-Boer 
War.

This new evil, or recurrence of an old evil on a gigantic scale, came 
as a great shock to General Butler, who wrote as follows to the 
Colonial Secretary on December 18, 1898: "All the political 
questions in South Africa and nearly all the information sent from 
Cape Town are being worked by what I have already described as a 
colossal syndicate for the spread of false information".

Hobson wrote in his book THE WAR IN SOUTH AFRICA: 

   "South Africa presents a unique example of a large
   press, owned, controlled and operated by a small body
   of men with the direct aim of bringing about a conflict
   which shall serve their business interests".

With prophetic insight, Hobson wrote a book, THE 
PSYCHOLOGY OF JINGOISM, which, as an analysis of the dishonest
uses of propaganda, bears comparison with George Orwell's 
NINETEEN EIGHTY FOUR.

Only a few of the major historic changes which ensued need be 
mentioned for our present purposes:  the Anglo-Boer War; two 
World Wars; the Bolshevik Revolution and setting up of the Soviet 
Union as an industrial and military super-power; the dismantling of 
the colonial empires and conversion of the former colonies into new 
nations, few of them economically viable; the delivery of mainland 
China and other vast areas in the Far East to totalitarian socialist 
rule; the setting up of the United Nations with its innumerable 
agencies as the prototype of some form of world government; and 
the progressive undermining of the national sovereignty of all the 
Western nations.  

It is significant that the first years of the 20th century also ushered 
in a phenomenon that was to remain a conspicuous  feature of the 
ensuing age of conflict, namely the concentration camp, symbol of 
an expanded barbarity in which civilians join the soldiers in the 
front line of every major conflict.   

We need to know what were the deep-seated changes in human 
affairs which gave rise to a worldwide chain-reaction of conflict and 
tragedy. As we shall try to show, these deep-rooted changes 
occurred in two quite separate realms, money and intellect. So, let us 
begin with an examination of the great change which took place in 
the world of money. 

Towards the end of the 19th century money began to acquire a new 
role and meaning in human affairs as economics began to prevail 
over politics.  The two need to be clearly distinguished as sources 
of value, motivation and control at the level of leadership. 

Politics is a social function concerned with the total welfare of a 
community, long-term as well as short-term, in which the requirements
of economics, although always important, have only a supportive or
secondary role.  Economic thinking, a mere department of political
thinking, is concerned exclusively with the requirements of economic
prosperity and progress.  It assumes automatically that whatever is good
for business is good for the community as a whole, an attitude of mind
that excludes virtually all other considerations.

What happened towards the end of the 19th century was, therefore, not
something of sudden occurrence; it must be seen rather as a crucial stage
having been reached in a process which had continued slowly during
most of the preceding century.  Not only did the Anglo-Boer War 
signalize the beginning of the end of the British Empire, it also signalized
the beginning of the end of national financial sovereignties all over
the Western world, a process that was to reach its culmination only in
the 1930s when the great American pioneering families, headed by J.P.
Morgan, were finally edged out of their dominating position in Wall
Street.

In the relations of politics and high finance there subsisted a very
complex state of affairs until shortly before the commencement of
World War II, which can be briefly explained as follows.

There had always existed within the national states of the Western
world families or dynasties of bankers, like the Rothschilds, 
Warburgs, Montefiores, etc. who lent to governments and specialized
in transactions across national frontiers, but these were never fully
integrated as an international system capable of controlling politics on
an international basis.

These concentrations of high finance, although always influential, 
lacked the power wholly to control the politics of the national states, 
but each remained an important part of a nationally oriented 
constellation of financial power. This was a situation that suited 
them well enough in the circumstances prevailing until the turn of 
the century. Enormous influence they could exert, - both nationally 
and internationally, but not the dominating power they were later to 
acquire.

Paradoxically, in spite of the enormous lead which the 
Jewish banking dynasties had gained in international commerce, it 
was the gentile financiers with their ownership and access to the 
cornucopia of new wealth, plus their control of national politics, 
who First established high finance on a fully internationalized 
basis. The facts are supplied by Dr. Carroll Quigley: 

   The apex of the system was to be the Bank of
   International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a
   private bank owned and controlled by the world's
   central banks which were themselves private
   corporations. Each central bank, in the hands of
   men like Montagu Norman of the Bank of England,
   Benjamin Strong of the New York Federal Reserve
   Bank, Charles Rist of the Bank of France, and
   Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichbank, sought to
   dominate its government by its ability to control
   Treasury bonds, to manipulate foreign exchanges,
   to influence the level of economic activity in the
   country, and to influence cooperative politicians by
   sub-sequent economic rewards in the business world.
   (Tragedy and Hope).

Quigley explains further that the Rothschilds had been pre-eminent 
during much of the 19th century, but at the end of that century "they 
were being replaced by J.P. Morgan", whose central office was in 
New York, although it. operated as if it were in London "Where it 
had indeed originated as George Peabody and Company in I838".

The process by which the separate national concentrations of 
financial power were absorbed into a global concentration was only 
completed in the 1930s, producing among other historical 
consequences the rise of the Third Reich in Germany, the outbreak 
of World War II and subsequent involvement of the United States 
and Japan, and the setting up of a Marxist-Leninist People's 
Republic of China.

Professor Quigley supplies many of the facts about the final shift in 
the center of gravity of financial power, and his story begins with 
these ominous words: 

   "The third stage of capitalism is of such 
   overwhelming significance in the history of the
   twentieth century, and its ramifications and 
   influences have been so subterranean and even
   occult, that we may be excused if we devote 
   considerable attention to its organization and
   methods." (Opp. cit, p.50).

It is the story, assembled from a vast accumulation of documented 
facts, of a process of change in the United States, beginning before 
World War I, which Wilmot Robertson was later to describe as the 
"dispossession of the American majority", (5) culminating in what 
Quigley calls "a shift on all levels, from changing tastes in 
newspaper comic strips . . .  to profound change in the power nexus 
of the 'American Establishment'"

>From  the 1880s the United States had been ruled from behind the
scenes by a plutocracy supported by the fortunes of the great
American pioneering families - Rockefeller, Carnegie, Vanderbilt,
Mellon, Duke, Whitney, Ford, Du Pont, etc - a power constellation
with J.P. Morgan as its banking center. This "Eastern Establishment"
is described by Quigley as "high Episcopalian, Anglophile, 
internationalist, Ivy League, and European-culture-conscious", and
was matched with a similar establishment on the other side of the
Atlantic with Montagu Norman as its banking head. The two
worked closely together and came to be known as the "Anglo-
American Establishment.

Quigley tells us of the "decline of J.P. Morgan itself from its 
deeply anonymous status as a partnership (founded in 1861) to its 
transformation into an incorporated public company in 1940 to its 
final disappearance by absorption into its chief banking subsidiary, 
the Guaranty Trust Company, in 1959". Quigley says that the less 
obvious implication of the shift in Wall Street was the realization by 
the Morgan group that it no longer had the votes on the Board of 
Trustees of Columbia University to nominate a successor to Dr. 
Nicholas Murray Butler, the retiring president.

In a word, the control of American higher education had quietly 
been taken out of the hands of America's great pioneering families, 
described by Quigley as "high Episcopalian, Anglophile and 
European-culture-conscious" - a studiously discreet way of saying 
that they were not Jewish.

Wall Street fell into the hands of the international financiers like a 
ripe plum, their real battle having been fought and won in the realm 
of parliamentary politics by methods which are still standard 
practice in the Western world; these include the financing of party 
politics, the manipulation of public opinion through the medium of 
newspapers, radio, the cinema, the book trade, etc, plus the 
penetration, financing and manipulation of trade union movements.

This was a take-over exercise in which America s emerging secret 
rulers could draw on centuries of accumulated expertise and 
experience as a nation struggling to survive in dispersion.

The eclipse of the power of the great American Families first took 
the form of taxation laws, beginning with the graduated income tax 
in 1913 and culminating in the inheritance tax, which drove all the 
great family fortunes into the refuge of tax-exempt foundations. 
Morgan and his circle lost control of the Federal Government as 
one money-and-intellect alliance was subtly replaced by another. 
And the fact that a money-and-intellect alliance behaves in much the 
same way no matter who controls it made the change hard to detect.

The Morgan group dabbled in the politics of the radical left and lost 
no time in trying to get a foothold in Russia after the Bolshevik 
Revolution.  But at this game they were no match for their Jewish 
rivals.  The rival Wall Street elites were both fired by the ideal and 
ambition of a "new world order", but there the similarity ended.

The original American establishment, like its British opposite 
number, was for containing the Soviet Union with its socialist 
rulers with a view to ultimate absorption of the Russian empire into 
a new world order to be raised on the foundations of the British 
Empire and which they, as inheritors of the Rhodes dream, would 
control. The other, the new Eastern Establishment. was for building 
up the Soviet Union as an industrial and military giant which would 
replace the British Empire as the foundation of a new world order 

These developments in the realm of finance capitalism and power 
politics came to a climax towards the end of the 1930s, coinciding 
with a considerable eruption all over the Western world of a social 
phenomenon misleadingly described as "anti-Semitism". (6)

Professor Hannah Arendt, in her book The Origins of Totalitarianism
puts  it  frankly and succinctly: "Twentieth century political
developments have driven the Jewish people into the storm center of
events . . . the Jewish question and antisemitism . . . became the
catalytic agent first for the rise of the Nazi movement and the
establishment of the organizational structure of the Third Reich . . .
then for a world war of unparalleled ferocity.

Henry Ford, who for many years had roundly condemned all the 
big bankers as the natural enemies of private enterprise industry, 
now drew a clear distinction between the house of Morgan, which 
he described as "constructive", and its rivals, whom he described as 
"warmongers".(7)  Morgan himself, like his opposite number in 
London, Montagu Norman, was known to dislike the Jews.  The 
talks of  Father Coughlin and writings of Father Denis Fahey, the 
frantic efforts of  Charles Lindbergh to keep America out of the 
war, and the activities of Oswald Mosley and his Blackshirts in 
Britain, were all reactions to the appearance of the Jewish people in 
"the storm center" of 20th century politics.  

What all these alarming developments mean is that a highly
concentrated Jewish financial power was suddenly seen to be
gaining ascendancy in the West.

Another layer in the prevailing political reality during the last 
decades of the l9th century must now be studied separately - 
namely, the thoughts about the future that were then circulating in 
the English ruling classes.

Cecil John Rhodes was one of the most potent men of action in 
English history, but he was also a visionary and dreamer, pictured 
by friend and foe as a callouses bestriding the continent of Africa. 
His ability to inspire activity and loyalty in others was proverbial. In 
the realm of pure thought, however, the unifying and emergising 
agent was not Rhodes but John Ruskin, at one time Slade Professor 
of Fine Arts at Oxford University, who had armed a generation of 
young Englishmen with an ideology of service having as its object 
the creation of a better and happier world. This was to be imagined 
as an extended application of the civilizing and humanizing concept 
of the British Empire; it was to be a fellowship of free and 
independent states held together by an abstract principle which 
came to be labeled the "English idea".

The numinosity, or sense of magic, evoked by these ideas can be 
traced to a single cause: the ideology of a "brave new world", with 
order and welfare for all mankind, was offered as a replacement for 
a religious orthodoxy that had long since begun to crumble under 
the impact of a scientific "enlightenment";  there was something  to 
restore to the existence of the educated and energetic a keen sense 
of meaning, purpose and direction, and ideology, moreover, which 
sanctified imperial expansion and the personal advancement of all 
its servants.  

So potent was this ideology as a secular religion that it won converts
all over the Western world; even former leaders of the conquered
Boers, including General Louis Botha, who was to be South Africa's
first Prime Minister, and General Jan Christian Smuts, yielded to
its psychic charm.

Practical measures to give effect to this political idealism took the 
form of a range of operations including the Rhodes Scholarship 
Trust, the semi-secret Round Table movement, the Royal Institute of 
International Affairs, the American Council on Foreign Relations, 
etc.

This was definitely a racial affair, invoking on both sides of the 
Atlantic a genteel racial response. Ralph Durand, in a book about 
Oxford University published in 1909, wrote of "Cecil Rhodes of 
Oriel, the dreamer of great dreams ... Believing that the preservation 
of the peace of the world lay in the hands of men of Teuton blood, 
he made provision in his will for the founding at Oxford of 
scholarships that would be open to citizens of the British Empire, 
the German Empire and the United States"- OXFORD: ITS 
BUILDINGS AND GARDENS, published by Grant Richards, London. 

The fatal flaw in this ideology does not belong to the art or science 
of politics  nor that of high finance, but to an area of knowledge less 
readily accessible to exploration and discussion, namely, 
metaphysics. Quigley puts his hand on the key to that riddle: each 
of the central banks in the different national states, he says, "sought 
to dominate its government" and to "influence co-operative 
politicians by subsequent rewards in the business world".

What this means is that something had already gone wrong in the 
West's different national power structures - all had incorporated a 
system of money creation and debt, a corrupting influence with 
implications of infinite complexity.

Money had become progressively the measure of all things, with a 
ruling elite drawn less and less from the land and more and more 
>from  the factory and the counting houses.  The nations had, in fact, 
become plutocracies, capable of maintaining themselves in power 
with a public opinion not sought and consulted as before but  
CREATED as required by newspapers, patronage and other 
"rewards in the business world".

Such a conversion of money into public opinion and support was 
accomplished in Britain by Rhodes and Milner and their "gold bug" 
partners, with a total disregard for all moral considerations. Money 
had shown what money could do.

There was, thus, an iron inevitability about the outcome of a struggle 
which the gentile financiers did not even see as a struggle: AN 
ALIEN HIGH FINANCE firmly united by long-range political 
aims, increasingly influenced the politics of the different national 
states and finally DISPLACED the gentile financiers as managers 
of the new international banking structure.

And educated minds, conditioned by John Ruskin's secular  
ideology calling  for a "new world" to be raised on the foundations 
of the British Empire, seem to have had no difficulty in transferring 
their attachment and enthusiasm to a new idealogy worked out by 
Marx and Engles.   

Antony Sutton's trilogy, WALL STREET AND THE BOLSHEVIK
REVOLUTION, WALL STREET AND THE RISE OF HITLER,
and WALL STREET AND FDR,contains a vast quantity of information
but is more remarkable FOR WHAT IT OMITS. For that Which is 
omitted is precisely what Professor Hannah Arendt correctly 
describes as the "catalytic agent" in the "storm center of events",  
namely, the role of the Jewish people in 2Oth century power 
politics.

So far as Sutton is concerned there is and always was only one 
"Wall Street Establishment", which is made to carry the main blame 
for the financing of the Bolshevik Revolution and later fur the 
financing of Hitler's rise to power in Germany.

That is a misleading over-simplification of the story.

In fact, Wall Street during the two preceding decades had a sort of 
split personality, one half of it symbolized by Morgan and the other 
by Warbug.  It is true,as alleged, that "Wall Street" helped to 
finance the Bolshevik Revolution, but in this exercise the Warburg 
faction (Jacob Schiff in particular) took the initiative, with the 
Morgan faction getting all The bad publicity as they belatedly tried 
to get a share of the action. There is much evidence also to support 
the contention that "Wall Street", this time clearly the Morgan 
interests, supported Hitler's rise to power.  But at the same time
who, if not the internationalists, were funding the Communist Party
in these crucial elections in Germany in 1930 in which the
communists gained spectacular successes?

The fiercest political struggles in the 1930s all over the West can 
now be more clearly seen as so many proxy battles on behalf of 
rival concentrations of financial power, culminating in World II and 
the triumph of the internationalists.

In Britain opposition to World War II came from what remained of 
the British end of the original Anglo-American establishment, 
labeled the "Clivenden set" - Cliveden being the name of the home 
of Lord Astor.

This interpretation will also help to explain one of the weirdest and 
most mysterious episodes in American history - a reported attempt, 
with the assistance of the American Legion and armed forces, to set 
up a "fascist style" dictatorship in the White House.

News of the plot was given brief front-page treatment in the NEW 
YORK TIMES on November 21, 1931; a congressional committee 
was set up to investigate the allegations; but then all news of the plot 
faded out of the press. Those involved included a few leading  
personalities in the American Legion and another organization 
known as Liberty League, which together seem to have undertaken 
to make available a force of 500,000 men. Leadership of the 
operation was offered to Major-General Smedley D. Butler, a much 
decorated military hero, but there is no real evidence that he ever 
agreed to go along with the plotters.  (8)

Significantly, it is exclusively the gentile power -wielders of big 
finance and big business who were identified as the culprits behind 
the scene, all linked in one way or another with J.P. Morgan: 
Grayson Murphy, a director of the Guaranty Company; Jackson 
Martindell, associated with Stone and Webster, allied to the 
Morgans; the DuPont Company; the Remington Arms Company, 
controlled by DuPont; and the Morgan-Harriman financial 
interests. It would seem, therefore, that the Morganite financiers and 
industrialists, finding themselves at last outmaneuvered and 
outgunned in Wall Street, were tempted  to take desperate measures 
against the international financiers - as had been done with some 
success in Italy and Germany.

As the rivalry of separate national constellations of financial power 
gave rise to last century's scramble for colonial possessions, so the 
consolidation of financial power on a global basis in the 20th 
century required the dismantling of all the colonial empires and 
their replacement with innumerable new states over which the 
separate nations of the West would be able to exercise little or no 
influence.

A clear distinction must, thus, be drawn between the pace and 
quantity of change and conflict in the world up until l939, when the 
new imperium was still in the process of being established, and the 
pace and quantity of change and conflict after the new imperium 
had emerged as the only real victor in World War II.

So much for the revolutionary change which occurred in the realm 
of high finance.

- - - - - -

We must now briefly examine a fundamentally charged Western 
intellect, which can be regarded as one of the main causes of our 
century of conflict - the other half  of that "alliance of money and 
intellect". 

The change can be said to have begun more than two 
centuries ago and to have been concomitant with the decline of 
Christianity as the consensus religion of the West.

The new kind of thinking and the new system of values which were 
inaugurated as a result of the decline of the influence of Christian 
orthodoxy came to be known as socialism. Socialism however, was 
only one of  the symptoms of something  much deeper with 
profound metaphysical implications, a condition better represented 
by the words "idealism" and "humanism";  socialism is, in fact, only 
idealism with an economic and political programme of sorts.

So, it is this "idealism" which we need to understand, an attitude to 
existence that responds readily to any plausible programme or 
ideology proposing the betterment of the world  and of mankind. 
Such ideologies  have included anarchism, nihilism, syndicalism, 
socialism, communism, etc. This  idealism supplies the psychic 
foundation for a system of secular belief which acquires the force 
and intensity of the religion which it has replaced.

There is a fundamental and most important difference between 1- a 
metaphysical or religious system of belief, and 2- a secular or 
humanist system of belief . The difference can be stated as follows:  

1.  All the great religions which have endured down the ages, 
    however different in their orthodoxies are founded on the
    central belief that human existence, like everything else in the
    universe, is governed by immutable laws of cause and effect
    which the intelligence must discover and obey.  What this
    amounts to is a recognition that human freedom finds fulfillment
    only as FREEDOM UNDER LAW.  We are free to do as we
    please but, if we are to avoid the disappointment of our hopes
    and expectations, if we are to preserve psychic health, we must
    first find out what can and what cannot be done.

2.  Fundamental to idealism or humanism is the notion that the
    intellect is fully qualified to be a law unto itself in promoting
    purposes  which can be visualized or imagined as socially
    advantageous, that is, well intentioned and for the common good.
    The element of error in this perception of the intellect as the 
    highest source of guidance in human affairs is extremely subtle, 
    hard to detect, and even harder to explain; it can be compared
    with a compass deflection in navigation which progressively
    falsifies all positional and directional calculations. The ancients
    called it HUBRIS, an attitude that presupposes that the intellect
    can conquer life itself as it can conquer the human environment. 
    Milton handles this most profound theme in the language of
    symbolism in his great epic poem PARADISE LOST. (9)

The almost irresistible attraction of socialism for the educated 
classes who last century found themselves without the support of 
their ancestral Christian faith is, therefore, understandable for it 
supplied a highly plausible and ingeniously elaborated framework 
of ideas calculated to free the world from many evils and to bring 
happiness and contentment to mankind.  It offered to the educated 
individual a laudable ambition and an integrated intellectual frame of 
reference which promised to infuse his existence with meaning and 
purpose.

Yet it is precisely this idealism, this attitude and this plausible kind 
of thinking, which has given the world a century of conflict and 
tragedy without precedent in recorded history.

Frankly, evil intentions in other ages never produced cruelty and
disorder on so vast a scale as idealism or humanism have produced
in the 20th century.

   Evil at the service of good intentions has been exposed by the 
experience of history as capable of producing the most dreadful 
consequences. It is in this area of conduct where ends are called on 
to justify means that the mind makes mistakes of a kind that the 
mind itself can not easily understand and where the mind is most 
exposed to the influences of  hostile cunning.  The great mistake is
to suppose that the means used can be justified by the quality of
the ends proposed when, in fact, as experience may only demonstrate
belatedly, it is only the actual results produced that can ever justify
the means.

   The idea that the laudable end envisioned, however distantly 
separated from the present, justifies the employment of whatever 
means are required for its attainment, is thus fundamental to 
idealism or humanism in whatever form it may take, whether as 
socialism or as that benevolent imperialism preached by John 
Ruskin and which captivated the mind of the young Cecil John 
Rhodes.

    Political idealism in action exhibits two major negative aspects: it 
undertakes long-term enterprises which are incapable of 
actualization because in conflict with unalterable requirements of 
human nature as expressed in instinct, and it produces among  its 
"believers" a progressive blunting or description of what, for want 
of a more precise description, we can call "a sense of evil".  In 
other words, immoral behavior in the service of an ideal is condoned 
and even recommended, and any suffering that ensues is habitually 
regarded with indifference as part of the price that must be paid for 
"progress".

Socialism as a substitute for a discredited religious orthodoxy, after 
a long period of incubation in Germany and central Europe early in 
the 19th century, was given a more scholarly form as "dialectical 
materialism", a materialistic interpretation of existence, by Karl 
Marx and was later presented in a more delusive and accept- able 
form by leading British intellectuals, including Edward Pease, 
George Bernard Shaw and Sidney Webb. The Fabian Society and 
later the London School of Economics were then set up as seedbeds 
for the future proliferation of socialist ideas and ideals throughout 
the English-speaking world, including the United States. 
Significantly Julius Wernher, of the Wernher-Beit conglomerate 
that supported Milner's effort to precipitate the Anglo-Boer War, 
contributed substantially to the funding of the London School of 
Economics and socialist movements everywhere, all vehemently 
"anti-capitalists", continued to receive massive support from the 
most powerful "capitalists." 

It was because of THE ABSENCE OF ANY FUNDAMENTAL 
ANTAGONISM between the philosophies of Juhn Ruskin and of 
Karl Marx that it was possible for the "Brave new World" ambition, 
so actively promoted by Rhodes and his heirs, to be absorbed into 
the socialist world-power vortex with hardly a sign that anything 
untoward had happened.   In fact, the international socialists, 
instruments of the most highly concentrated financial power, were 
able to take over the Rhodes-Milner establishment, complete with its 
worldwide network of organizations - the Rhodes Scholarship 
Trust, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Council on 
Foreign Relations, the Trilaterals, etc - and continue to run  it as if 
still under its original management; indeed, it simply gave the 
socialists a new Dimension for the exercise of their incomparable 
skill in the arts of deception.

The decay of Christianity in its orthodox forms, and especially in its 
institutionalized form as the Church, proved overwhelmingly to the 
advantage of the new order of financiers.

For many centuries in the West, Christian orthodoxy had been 
more than something to believe; it had become a world view, an 
interpretation of the totality of existence and, as such, the very 
medium in which men's minds had their reality, as water is the 
medium in which fish fulfill their existence. The educated classes in 
the west would need a new religion, better still a secular substitute, 
one fully in harmony with the new rationalist climate of thought 
engendered by a triumphant science. This was provided in the form 
of socialism, an intellectual frame of reference and system of values 
which has continued to dominate higher education in the West into 
the beginning of the 20th century, especially in academic disciplines 
like history, anthropology, sociology and political science

This socialism can be said to have two separate and different 
realities: 1- It is something that can be believed; and 2- It is 
something that can be used. Spengler recognized socialism's double 
character when he remarked that every proletarian movement, even a 
communist one, "Operates  in the interest of money" adding 
significantly "without the idealist in its ranks having the slightest 
suspicion of the fact".  (10)

The crippling effect of socialism as an intellectual frame of 
reference can be ascribed to the fact that it is basically a confidence 
trick, one of the components of a dialectical trap with money that 
funds socialism as THESIS, a socialism in which men believe as 
ANTITHESIS and "the new imperium" as  SYNTHESIS.  Money 
grabs and concentrates power and socialism promises the ultimate 
redistribution of ownership and power; the resolution of this 
contradiction supplies the new imperium with its irresistible 
dynamic.

But why should an alliance of money and intellect ostensibly bent 
on reforming the world and reducing it to order have produced in 
the 20th century so much more conflict than was produced last 
century and earlier when the nations of Europe were engaged in a 
competitive scramble for aggrandizement, and especially for 
colonial possessions?

It would appear that money and intellect as determinants in the 
shaping of history had undergone a radical change for the worse, 
giving rise, among other phenomena, to what Professor P.T. Bauer 
has described as "an undeclared, one-sided civil war in the West". 
(11)

A money power alien to the West cannot tolerate health, strength 
and order in the West; it is, therefore, committed to policies of 
destructiveness. Health, strength and order in any part of the world 
can only mean selfwill and self determination in that area, an 
obstacle to money's global power-concentrating purposes.  An alien 
money power needs a world of ethnic communities reduced to a 
condition of arrested cultural and political development and has 
concentrated its enmity on the Western community of nations, 
which it sees as the main rival for world dominion.

The new imperium finds its strength in the weakness of all those it 
seeks to control.

The 19th century plutocracies, by contrast, could not afford to 
weaken their own national communities; and by undisguised direct 
rule in their colonies, requiring little force, were able to create areas 
of order which were able to create areas of order which were almost 
always under their control.  Moreover, the colonial powers tended to 
leave as much as possible unchanged and undisturbed in the areas 
which came under their control, ruling as far as possible through the 
medium of traditional institutions. Placing themselves, as it were, at 
the top of the primaeval hierarchical order.  

The new imperium has spread conflict and disorder trying to rule 
secretly and indirectly by means of artificially contrived surrogate 
regimes, everywhere disrupting the natural hierarchical order within 
and between ethnic groups.  In other words, an extraneous power 
has everywhere prevented the emergence of what Robert Ardrey 
would call the natural "pecking order" within and between 
contiguous ethnic groups.  In fact, in very many instances, a reversal 
of the ancient "pecking order" (12) has been found necessary by the 
world's new secret rulers.  (13)

It is this disturbance of relationships within and between ethnic 
groups which has given the 20th century an age of conflict and 
tragedy without precedent in world history.

A process of unfolding history having  as its culmination the 
decline of the West and a century of unprecedented conflict can be 
traced to many causes. but central to all  the corrupting  principle of  
USURY - money traded as a commodity and lent at interest - as a 
component of the world's monetary system.

Our century of conflict thus has many meanings, some of them 
beyond our powers of understanding, but that which we need and 
can use is the knowledge that the peoples of the West have only 
themselves  to blame for the plight in which they and the rest of the 
world find themselves today; for they have themselves created the 
morally unhygienic conditions in which evil flourishes as never 
before. The prediction and promise of the Old Testament prophets 
has been fulfilled: the nation of lenders has become "the head" and 
all the others, blind to usury's hidden peril, "the tail"

- - - - - -

1.  This Age of Conflict, F.P. Chambers, C.P. Harris and C. G.
    Bayley (Harcourt Brace & Co).
2.  See, The Siege of South Africa, (Institute for Historical Review),
    and The Zionist Factor (Veritas), both Ivor Benson.
3.  See, The Zionist Factor, above mentioned.
4.  An Autobiography, Sir William Butler (Constable).
5.  The Dispossessed Majority, Wilmot Robertson (Howard Allen)
6.  See, Antisemitism, Bernard Lazare (Britons); The Zionist 
    Connection, Alfred M. Lilienthal (Veritas); The Controversy of
   Zion, Douglas Reed (Veritas); and others.
7.  Who Financed Hitler, James Pool and Suzanne Pool (Dial Press)
8.  War is a Racket, Smedley Butler (Noontide Press)
9.  See, A Preface to Paradise Lost, C. S. Lewis (Oxford University
    Press).
10. The Decline of the West, Oswald Spengler, (Allen & Unwin).
11. Equality, the Third World and Economic Delusion, P.T. Bauer
    (Weidenfeld & Nicolson).
12. African Genesis, Robert Ardrey (Collins).
13. See, 'Dr. Sun Yat-sen and the Principals of Nationalism' in Truth
    Out of Africa.  Ivor Benson (Veritas).
14. See, The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed (Veritas).

Other References in Text:

Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism (Harcourt Brace
   Jovanovich).
Ralph Durand, Oxford: It's Buildings and Gardens (Grant Richards)
J.A. Hobson, The Psychology of Jingoism, and the War in South
   Africa (James Nisbet).
John Milton, Paradise Lost (New American Library).
George Orwell, 1984 (Secker & Warburg)
Thomas Pakenham, The Boer War (Weidenfeld & Nicolson)
Carrol Quigley, Tragedy and Hope (Macmillan Company).
Antony C. Sutton, Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution,
   and Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler (both Veritas), and
   Wall Street and FDR (Random House).
Arnold Toynbee, A Study of History.

------
A guide to further reading is given under the heading 
BIBLIOGRAPHY, at the end of Part Two, 'The Source and 
Technology of Illegitimate Power."

 ----------------------------------------

Get the "Identity.faq" by anonymous FTP and many 
other files from:   ftp.netcom.com  /pub/SF/SFA

-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|   For unique political commentary & Christian views        Rick Savage    | 
|     Anonymous FTP:  ftp.netcom.com  - pub/SF/SFA           PO Box 5251    |
|   To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file       Denver, CO 80217 |
|       In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help.                 (u)SA       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Sun Jun 18 17:00:36 PDT 1995
Article: 5791 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!Sunserver.insinc.net!news.Direct.CA!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: What is Racism?
Message-ID: 
Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 05:31:49 GMT
Lines: 274
Sender: rsavage@netcom12.netcom.com

---------------------------------------
Get the "Identity.faq" and many other files by
anonymous FTP from:    ftp.netcom.com /pub/SF/SFA
-------------------------------------------------


                          WHAT IS RACISM?                        
                         by Thomas Jackson
   {Originally Published in American Renaissance, Vol 2, No. 8}

     There is surely no nation in the world that holds "racism"
in greater horror than does the United States. Compared to other
kinds of offenses, it is thought to be somehow more
reprehensible. The press and public have become so used to tales
of murder, rape, robbery, and arson, that any but the most
spectacular crimes are shrugged off as part of the inevitable
texture of American life. "Racism" is never shrugged off.        
For example, when a white Georgetown Law School student reported
earlier this year that black students are not as qualified as
white students, it set off a booming, national controversy about
"racism." If the student had merely murdered someone he would
have attracted far less attention and criticism.
     Racism is, indeed, the national obsession. Universities
are on full alert for it, newspapers and politicians denounce it,
churches preach against it, America is said to be racked with it,
but just what *is* racism?
     Dictionaries are not much help in understanding what is
meant by the word. They usually define it as the belief that
one's own ethnic stock is superior to others, or as the belief
that culture and behavior are rooted in race. When Americans
speak of racism they mean a great deal more than this.        
Nevertheless, the dictionary definition of racism is a clue to
understanding what Americans *do* mean. A peculiarly American
meaning derives from the current dogma that all ethnic stocks are
equal. Despite clear evidence to the contrary, all races have
been declared to be equally talented and hard- working, and
anyone who questions the dogma is thought to be not merely wrong
but evil.
     The dogma has logical consequences that are profoundly
important. If blacks, for example, are equal to whites in every
way, what accounts for their poverty, criminality, and
dissipation? Since any theory of racial differences has been
outlawed, the only possible explanation for black failure is
white racism. And since blacks are markedly poor, crime-prone,
and dissipated, America must be racked with pervasive racism.
Nothing else could be keeping them in such an abject state.      
     All public discourse on race today is locked into this rigid
logic. Any explanation for black failure that does not depend on
white wickedness threatens to veer off into the forbidden
territory of racial differences. Thus, even if today's whites can
find in their hearts no desire to oppress blacks, yesterday's
whites must have oppressed them. If whites do not consciously
oppress blacks, they must oppress them UNconsciously. If no
obviously racist individuals can be identified, then
*institutions* must be racist. Or, since blacks are failing so
terribly in America, there simply must be millions of white
people we do not know about, who are working day and night to
keep blacks in misery. The dogma of racial equality leaves no
room for an explanation of black failure that is not, in some
fashion, an indictment of white people.
    The logical consequences of this are clear. Since we are
required to believe that the only explanation for non-white
failure is white racism, every time a non-white is poor, commits
a crime, goes on welfare, or takes drugs, white society stands
accused of yet another act of racism. All failure or misbehavior
by non-whites is standing proof that white society is riddled
with hatred and bigotry. For precisely so long as non-whites fail
to succeed in life at exactly the same level as whites, whites
will be, by definition, thwarting and oppressing them. This
obligatory pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions.
First of all, racism is a sin that is thought to be committed
almost exclusively by white people. Indeed, a black congressman
>from  Chicago, Gus Savage, and Coleman Young, the black mayor of
Detroit, have argued that only white people *can* be racist.
Likewise, in 1987, the affirmative action officer of the State
Insurance Fund of New York issued a company pamphlet in which
she explained that *all* whites are racist and that *only* whites
can be racist. How else could the plight of blacks be explained
without flirting with the possibility of racial inequality?      
     Although some blacks and liberal whites concede that non-whites
can, perhaps, be racist, they invariably add that non-whites have
been forced into it as self-defense because of centuries of white
oppression. What appears to be non-white racism is so
understandable and forgivable that it hardly deserves the name.
Thus, whether or not an act is called racism depends on the race
of the racist. What would surely be called racism when done by
whites is thought to be normal when done by anyone else. The
reverse is also true.
     Examples of this sort of double standard are so common,
it is almost tedious to list them: When a white man kills a black
man and uses the word "nigger" while doing so, there is an 
enormous media uproar and the nation beats its collective breast;
when members of the black Yahweh cult carry out ritual murders of
random whites, the media are silent (see AR of March, 1991).
College campuses forbid pejorative statements about non-whites as
"racist," but ignore scurrilous attacks on whites.
     At election time, if 60 percent of the white voters vote
for a white candidate, and 95 percent of the black voters vote
for the black opponent, it is white who are accused of racial
bias. There are 107 "historically black" colleges, whose
fundamental blackness must be preserved in the name of diversity,
but all historically white colleges must be forcibly integrated
in the name of... the same thing. To resist would be racist.     
     "Black pride" is said to be a wonderful and worthy thing, but
anything that could be construed as an expression of white pride
is a form of hatred. It is perfectly natural for third-world
immigrants to expect school instruction and driver's tests in
their own languages, whereas for native Americans to ask them to
learn English is racist.
     Blatant anti-white prejudice, in the form of affirmative
action, is now the law of the land. Anything remotely like
affirmative action, if practiced in favor of whites, would be
attacked as despicable favoritism.
     All across the country, black, Hispanic, and Asian clubs
and caucuses are thought to be fine expressions of ethnic
solidarity, but any club or association expressly for whites is
by definition racist. The National Association for the
Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) campaigns openly for black
advantage but is a respected "civil rights" organization. The
National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP)
campaigns merely for equal treatment of all races, but is said to
be viciously racist.
     At a few college campuses, students opposed to
affirmative action have set up student unions for whites,
analogous to those for blacks, Hispanics, etc, and have been
roundly condemned as racists. Recently, when the white students
at Lowell High School in San Francisco found themselves to be a
minority, they asked for a racially exclusive club like the ones
that non- whites have. They were turned down in horror. Indeed,
in America today, any club not specifically formed to be a white
enclave but whose members simply happen all to be white is
branded as racist.
     Today, one of the favorite slogans that define the
asymmetric quality of American racism is "celebration of
diversity." It has begun to dawn on a few people that "diversity"
is always achieved at the expense of whites (and sometimes men),
and never the other way around. No one proposes that Howard
University be made more diverse by admitting whites, Hispanics,
or Asians. No one ever suggests that National Hispanic University
in San Jose (CA) would benefit from the diversity of having
non-Hispanics on campus. No one suggests that the Black
Congressional Caucus or the executive ranks of the NAACP or the
Mexican-American Legal Defense and Educational Fund suffer from a
lack of diversity. Somehow, it is perfectly legitimate for them
to celebrate *homogeneity*. And yet any all-white group - a
company, a town, a school, a club, a neighborhood - is thought to
suffer from a crippling lack of diversity that must be remedied
as quickly as possible. Only when whites have been reduced to a
minority has "diversity" been achieved.
      Let us put it bluntly: To "celebrate" or "embrace"
diversity, as we are so often asked to do, is no different from
*deploring an excess of whites.* In fact, the entire nation is
thought to suffer from an excess of whites. Our current
immigration policies are structured so that approximately 90
percent of our annual 800,000 legal immigrants are non-white. The
several million illegal immigrants that enter the country every
year are virtually all non-white. It would be racist not to be
grateful for this laudable contribution to "diversity."        
It is, of course, only white nations that are called upon to
practice this kind of "diversity." It is almost criminal to
imagine a nation of any other race countenancing blatant
dispossession of this kind.
     What if the United States were pouring its poorest,
least educated citizens across the border into Mexico? Could
anyone be fooled into thinking that Mexico was being "culturally
enriched?" What if the state of Chihuahua were losing its
majority population to poor whites who demanded that schools be
taught in English, who insisted on celebrating the Fourth of
July, who demanded the right to vote even if they weren't
citizens, who clamored for "affirmative action" in jobs and
schooling?
     Would Mexico - or any other non-white nation - tolerate
this kind of cultural and demographic depredation? Of course not.
Yet white Americans are supposed to look upon the flood of
Hispanics and Asians entering their country as a priceless
cultural gift. They are supposed to "celebrate" their own loss
of influence, their own dwindling numbers, their own
dispossession, for to do otherwise would be hopelessly racist.   
     There is another curious asymmetry about American racism.
When non- whites advance their own racial purposes, no one ever
accuses them of "hating" another group. Blacks can join "civil
rights" groups and Hispanics can be activists without fear of
being branded as bigots and hate mongers. They can agitate openly
for racial preferences that can come only at the expense of
whites. They can demand preferential treatment of all kinds
without anyone ever suggesting that they are "anti-white."       
    Whites, on the other hand, need only express their opposition to
affirmative action to be called haters. They need only subject
racial policies that are clearly prejudicial to themselves to be
called racists. Should they actually go so far as to say that
they prefer the company of their own kind, that they wish to be
left alone to enjoy the fruits of their European heritage, they
are irredeemably wicked and hateful.
     Here, then is the final, baffling inconsistency about
American race relations. All non-whites are allowed to prefer the
company of their own kind, to think of themselves as groups with
interests distinct from those of the whole, and to work openly
for group advantage. None of this is thought to be racist. At the
same time, *whites* must *also* champion the racial interests of
non-whites. They must sacrifice their own future on the altar of
"diversity" and cooperate in their own dispossession. They are to
encourage, even to subsidize, the displacement of a European
people and culture by alien peoples and cultures. To put it in
the simplest possible terms, white people are cheerfully to
slaughter their own society, to commit racial and cultural
suicide. To refuse to do so would be racism.
     Of course, the entire non-white enterprise in the United
States is perfectly natural and healthy. Nothing could be more
natural than to love one's people and to hope that it should
flourish. Filipinos and El Salvadorans are doubtless astonished
to discover that simply by setting foot in the United States they
are entitled to affirmative action preferences over native-born
whites, but can they be blamed for accepting them? Is it
surprising that they should want their languages, their cultures,
their brothers and sisters to take possession and put their mark
indelibly on the land? If the once-great people of a once-great
nation is bent upon self-destruction and is prepared to hand
over land and power to whomever shows up and asks for it, why
should Mexicans and Cambodians complain?
     No, it is the white enterprise in the United States that
is unnatural, unhealthy, and without historical precedent. Whites
have let themselves be convinced that it is racist merely to
object to dispossession, much less to work for their own
interests. Never in the history of the world has a dominant
people thrown open the gates to strangers, and poured out its
wealth to aliens. Never before has a people been fooled into
thinking that there was virtue or nobility in surrendering its
heritage, and giving away to others its place in history.        
Of all the races in America, only whites have been tricked into
thinking that a preference for one's own kind is racism. Only
whites are ever told that a love for their own people is somehow
"hatred" of others. All healthy people prefer the company of
their own kind, and it has nothing to do with hatred. All men
love their families more than their neighbors, but this does not
mean that they hate their neighbors. Whites who love their racial
family need bear no ill will towards non-whites. They only wish
to be left alone to participate in the unfolding of their racial
and cultural destinies.
     What whites in America are being asked to do is
therefore utterly unnatural. They are being asked to devote
themselves to the interests of other races and to ignore the
interests of their own. This is like asking a man to forsake his
own children and love the children of his neighbors, since to do
otherwise would be "racist."
     What then, is "racism?" It is considerably more than any
dictionary is likely to say. It is any opposition by whites to
official policies of racial preference for non-whites. It is any
preference by whites for their own people and culture. It is any
resistance by whites to the idea of becoming a minority people.
It is any unwillingness to be pushed aside. It is, in short, any
of the normal aspirations of people-hood that have defined
nations since the beginning of history - but only so long as the
aspirations are those of whites.

------------------------

For further study on the issue of race listen to the recorded message,
_Scriptural Understanding of Race_ by Pastor Pete J. Peters.  Audio tape 
$4.00 offering, booklet by same name $1.00.

Available from Scriptures for America, 
P.O. Box 766-c, 
LaPorte, CO 80535 

---------------------------------------
Get the "Identity.faq" and many other files by
anonymous FTP from:    ftp.netcom.com /pub/SF/SFA
-------------------------------------------------

-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|   For unique political commentary & Christian views        Rick Savage    | 
|     Anonymous FTP:  ftp.netcom.com  - pub/SF/SFA           PO Box 5251    |
|   To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file       Denver, CO 80217 |
|       In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help.                 (u)SA       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Sun Jun 18 17:00:41 PDT 1995
Article: 5792 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!Sunserver.insinc.net!news.Direct.CA!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: The Ducks and the Hens
Message-ID: 
Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 05:32:52 GMT
Lines: 393
Sender: rsavage@netcom12.netcom.com

From:    ftp.netcom.com /pub/SF/SFA
-----------------------------------

The Fable of the DUCKS AND THE HENS

Many, many years ago, 
When animals could speak
A wondrous thing the ducks befell; 
Their tale is quite unique.

Down by a pond dwelt all these ducks, 
Ten thousand at the least.
Their duckish joys were undisturbed, 
By any man or beast.

One day, down near the entrance gate, 
There was an awful din.
A hundred hens all out of breath, 
Were begging to come in.

"Oh, let us in!" the poor birds cried.  
"Before we do expire!"
"'Tis only by the merest inch 
That we escaped the fire!"

Their feathers singed, their combs adroop, 
They were the saddest sight.
They'd run a hundred miles or more, 
All day and then all night.

"Come in!  Come in!"  the ducks all quacked, 
"For you our hearts do bleed!
"We'll share our happy lot with you, 
"Just tell us what you need!"

And so the poor, bedraggled hens, 
Among the ducks moved in.
"For, after all," the ducks declared, 
"We're sisters 'neath the skin."

Before too many months had passed, 
The hens were good as new.
They sent for all their rooster friends, 
And these were welcomed too.

To please their hosts, 
the chickens tried to waddle and to quack,
To simulate the duckish ways 
they quickly learned the knack.

This pleased the flock of ducks, 
because it gratified their pride.
But hear my tale, and learn 
how they got taken for a ride.

The ducks, it seemed, 
spent all their time in fixing up the place,
In growing food and building homes 
and cleaning every space.

They asked the hens what they would do 
to earn their daily bread.
"We'll teach and write and entertain, 
and buy and sell," they said.

And so the hens began to teach 
the baby ducks and chicks.
They traded food and eggs and things, 
with many clever tricks.

They wrote great books and put on shows; 
of genius they'd no lack.
It wasn't long till chickens 
owned The Duckville Daily Quack.

One day a mother duck who took 
Her ducklings to the lake,
Was flabbergasted when one said, 
"A swim I will not take!"

"Why, ducklings always swim!" she gasped.  
"It's what you're built to do!
"Like bunnies hop, and crickets chirp, 
and cows "most always moo!"

"You're nuts!"  her little son replied, 
"That stuff is all old hat!"
"It's wrong for birds to swim; besides, 
It's damned cold on my pratt!"

"Oh, fie!"  the mother duck exclaimed, 
"You're talking like a fool!"
Up quacked the other ducks and said, 
"He's right!  We learned in school!"

"Such things must stop!" the mother cried, 
"Those hens can't teach such lies!"
"For sheer ingratitude and nerve, 
I'm sure this takes the prize!"

But she was wrong, for even then 
the hens did thump the tub,
Demanding they be let into 
The Duckville Swimming Club.

"But you don't swim!" the ducks exclaimed, 
"To join, why should you care?"
"That's not the point!" the hens replied, 
"To exclude us isn't fair!"

The younger ducks, who'd been to school, 
Agreed right there and then:
"To keep them out is bigotry!  
"'Twould just be anti-hen!"

Outnumbered by the younger ducks, 
The old ducks soon did lose.
They agreed to let the hens all in, 
If they would pay the dues.

That night the Duckville Daily Quack 
contained this banner spread:
"Reactionary Ducks are Licked!  
Duckville Moves Ahead!"

Down at the Duckville Gaiety, 
the young set laughed with glee,
At cracks about "old fuddy ducks" 
in burlesque repartee.

Next day the hens were at the club.  
A petition they'd sent 'round:
They objected to the swimming fund 
with fury and with sound.

"You use our dues to fix the pond, 
to keep it neat and trim,
"And this is wrong," they said, 
"because you know we do not swim!"

"God help us!" cried a wise old duck, 
"These chickens have gone mad!"
"We'll take this thing to court, by George!  
And justice will be had!"

But when they went up to the judge, 
imagine their dismay!
A chicken-judge decreed 
that they a heavy fine to pay!

"Minorities must have their rights!" 
The judge declared right then.
"To use hens' dues to fix the pond 
is very anti-hen!"

Once more the Duckville Daily Quack 
emblazoned 'cross the page:
"Old-Fogey Ducks Refuse to See 
The Great New Coming Age!"

In Duckville's church on Sunday morn, 
The preacher spoke these words,
"Discrimination's got to stop!  
Remember, we're all birds!"

The wisest duck in all the town 
sat down in black despair.
"I'll write a book," he thought, 
"and then this madness I will bare!"

"Let swimmers swim, let hoppers hop, 
let each one go his way."
"Let none coerce a fellow bird!" 
Was what he had to say.

"Twere wrong to force the hens to swim, 
so here's the problem's crux;
"It's just as bad for hens 
to try to chicken-ize our ducks!"

"I can't print that," the printer said, 
"twill put me in a mess!"
"My shop is mortgaged to the hens; 
the chickens own my press!"

This worried duck then tried to warn 
His friends by speech and pen, 
But young ducks fresh from school just jeered.  
"He's vicious anti-hen!"

Now up the stream a little way 
was Gooseville, on the lake.
The hens had come to Gooseville too, 
but the geese were more awake.

When the hens began to spoil the young, 
and Gooseville's laws to flout,
The geese rose up in righteous wrath 
and simply threw them out.

Of course you know where they all ran; 
on Duckville they converged.
"We've got to take these refugees," 
was what the hens all urged.

The Duckville Daily Quack declared: 
"These geese will stop at naught!
"They plan to conquer all the world!  
Atrocities they've wrought!"

"That's right!" the young ducks all agreed, 
"We'll help our fellow birds!
"These geese have plans to conquer us!  
We've read the Quack's own words!"

They let the hens from Gooseville in, 
The whole bedraggled pack.
And every hen took up a job 
on Duckville's Daily Quack!

When Duckvilles' mayor's term was up, 
The Quack put up its duck.
A vain and stupied duck was he, 
a verifiable cluck!

But when he praised the wild young ducks, 
and cursed the evil geese,
The Quack declared he was all-wise; 
His praise would never cease.

The hens chipped in to help this cluck 
give grain away for free.
The old ducks sadly shook their heads; 
the writing they could see.

And, sure enough, this stupid duck, 
He was elected mayor.
>From  this point on, the Duckville ducks, 
they never had a prayer.

The mayor said, "Gooseville must go! 
We'll wipe them off the map!"
While Duckville slept, the scheming hens 
for Goosville set a trap.

They called the geese by filthy names; 
they filled their pond with sticks.
They helped the weasels catch the geese, 
and other hennish tricks.

The geese got mad and threw some rocks.  
"It's war!" the Quack announced.
"We ducks must fight those evil geese 
"'Till they've been soundly trounced!"

The ducks (who knew not 
of the tricks indulged in by the mayor)
Were filled with patriotic zeal, 
and pitched right in for fair!

Now when the ducks had whipped the geese, 
the mayor called "Retreat!"
"Our hennish friends should really take 
Gooseville's big main street!"

The hens were back in Gooseville now. 
They starved and beat the geese.
They prayed for peace-but organized 
the "Hennish Armed Police!"

They drained the Gooseville swimming pond; 
they de-goose-ified the schools;
They wrung the neck of Gooseville's mayor 
on lately made-up rules.

They formed a council of the hens: 
"United Birds" the name.
The other birds who joined the thing 
did not perceive the game.

No sooner had they set this up, 
than they announced their plan
To seize up Swanville as a home 
for all their hennish clan.

They took a vote amongst the hens, 
and every one approved!
"Swanville was for hens!" they said, 
"Way back, before we moved."

And so they kicked the swans all out 
with Duckville's help and power,
And Duckville couldn't understand 
why swans on them turned sour.

By this time, Duckville was a mess; 
The young ducks had gone mad.
They stole and laughed at truth and law; 
They went completely bad.

The hens were selling loco weed 
In every nasty den.
But ducks who dared to mention this 
were labelled "anti-hen."

The hens all preached of tolerance.  
They invoked the Golden Rule,
But they subsidized the indigent, 
the greedy, and the fool.

At last the very dumbest ducks 
began to smell a rat.
"This mayor is no good!" they cried, 
"And we will soon fix that!"

But the hens had planned for even this; 
a Candidate they had
Whom even wise old ducks believed 
just never could be bad.

This hen-tool duck had whipped the geese; 
A soldier-duck was he.
Although the hens had set him up, 
the ducks all thought him free.

This hen-tool got elected, 
through ignorance and greed,
Through hennish lies in press and speech, 
through bribes of chicken feed.

The hens now kicked the ducks around 
without a blush of shame,
Until the mayor ran the town 
in nothing else by name.

They pumped the swimming pool all dry; 
they taught the ducks to crow.
While duckish numbers dwindled, 
the hens' began to grow.

The hens stirred up the happy crows 
>from  out the piney wood,
to come and mix with all the ducks 
in the name of brotherhood.

Things got so bad that fifty ducks 
who knew of days gone by
Took up their wives and children 
and decided that they'd fly.

They flew through storm and tempest; 
They froze, and many died.
But on they drove, until, at last, 
a lovely lake they spied.

They settled down exhausted, 
but soon went straight to work
To build and clear and cultivate. 
No danger did they shirk.

Now, after many years of toil, 
this little band had grown.
The fields around were full of grain 
>from  seeds that they had sown.

The first ducks now were long since dead; 
their struggles long had ceased.
Through hard work and suffering 
their joys had been increased.

One day near the entrance gate 
there was and awful din;
A hundred hens, all out of breath, 
were begging to come in.

"Oh, let us in!" the poor birds cried, 
"Before we do expire!"
"'Tis only by the merest inch...."  
And now our tale repeats itself entire.

- G. L. Rockwell  (1918-1967)


---------------------------------------
Get the "Identity.faq" and many other files by
anonymous FTP from:    ftp.netcom.com /pub/SF/SFA
-------------------------------------------------

-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|   For unique political commentary & Christian views        Rick Savage    | 
|     Anonymous FTP:  ftp.netcom.com  - pub/SF/SFA           PO Box 5251    |
|   To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file       Denver, CO 80217 |
|       In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help.                 (u)SA       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Sun Jun 18 17:00:58 PDT 1995
Article: 5793 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!Sunserver.insinc.net!news.Direct.CA!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Whites & Blacks 100 Facts
Message-ID: 
Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 05:29:59 GMT
Lines: 989
Sender: rsavage@netcom12.netcom.com

Get the "Identity.faq" and many other files by
anon. FTP from:    ftp.netcom.com /pub/SF/SFA
Scriptures for America files are also available by WWW:
  http://nyx10.cs.du.edu:8001/~nmonagha/arc.html
-------------------------------------------------

Whites & Blacks 100 FACTS (and one Lie)
   By Roger Roots

Senator Bilbo's Warning
   "If our buildings, our highways, and our railroads should be 
wrecked, we could rebuild them.  If our cities should be destroyed, 
out of the very ruins we could erect newer and greater ones.  Even 
if our armed might should be crushed, we could rear sons who 
would redeem our power.  But if the blood of our White race 
should become corrupted and mingled with the blood of Africa, 
then the present greatness of the United States of America would 
be destroyed and all hope for civilization would be as impossible 
for a Negroid America as would be redemption and restoration of 
the Whiteman's blood which had been mixed with that of the 
Negro."
    -Senator Theodore G. Bilbo, of Mississippi in 1947

    In the pages of this booklet are found 100 facts, the vast 
majority of which can be easily verified in any set of 
encyclopedias, almanacs, psychology text, and other reference 
materials commonly found in any public library.

THE LIE 
   Cleverly hidden within these hundred facts, for added incentive 
to read onward, is one lie.  not a lie of statistical or grammatical 
error, but a ludicrous falsehood at once so absurd as to strike the 
reader as an insult to human intelligence, and yet so deadly evil 
that if allowed to go unanswered its final cost would be 
incalculable. 
   I sincerely pledge that my motivations are not of insult or hatred, 
but of the deepest love for mankind and the truest concern for its 
future generations.  my purpose is not to deceive but to enlighten, 
and I hope this work will help you reflect and reexamine your 
views on race.

FACT #1:  The White race has crossed seas, harnessed rivers, 
carved mountains, tamed deserts, and colonized the most barren 
icefields.  It has been responsible for the invention of the printing 
press, cement, the harnessing of electricity, flight, rocketry, 
astronomy, the telescope, space travel, firearms, the transistor, 
radio, television, the telephone, the lightbulb, photography, motion 
pictures, the phonograph, the electric battery, the automobile, the 
steam engine, railroad transportation, the microscope, computers, 
and millions of other technological miracles. It has discovered 
countless medical advances, incredible applications, scientific 
progress, etc.
   Its members have included such greats as Socrates, Aristotle, 
Plato, Homer, Tacitus, Julius Ceaser, Napoleon, William the 
Conqueror, Marco Polo, Washington, Jefferson, Hitler, Bach, 
Beethoven, Mozart, Magellan, Columbus, Cabot, Edison, 
GrahamBell, Pasteur, Leeuwenhoek, Mendel, Darwin, Newton, 
Galileo, Watt, Ford, Luther, Devinci, Poe, Tennyson, and 
thousands upon thousands of other notable achievers. (37)  (39)

FACT #2:  Throughout 6,000 years of recorded history, the Black 
African Negro has invented nothing.  Not a written language, 
weaved cloth, a calendar, a plow, a road, a bridge, a railway, a ship, 
a system of measurement, or even the wheel.  (Note:  This is in reference
to the pure-blooded Negro.)
   He is not known to have ever cultivated a single crop or 
domesticated a single animal for his own use (although many 
powerful and docile beasts abounded around him.)  His only 
known means of transporting goods was on the top of his hard 
burry head.  For shelter he never progressed beyond the common 
mud hut, the construction of which a beaver or muskrat is capable.
(21)  (39)

INTELLIGENCE

FACT #3: The I.Q.'s of American Negroes are from 15 to 20 
points, on average, below those of American Whites.  (26)  (16)
(18)  (22)

FACT #4:  These Black\White differences have been 
demonstrated repeatedly by every test ever conducted by every 
branch of the U.S. Military, every state, county, and local school 
board, the U.S. Dept. of Education, etc.  The same ratio of 
difference has held true over a 40 year period.  (18)  (26)  (24)

FACT #5:  With an average I.Q. of 85, only 16% of Blacks score 
over 100, while half the White population does.  The Negro 
overlap of White median I.Q.'s ranges from 10 to 25 percent--
equality would require 50 percent.  (31)  (27)  (16)

FACT #6:  Blacks are 6 times as likely to have I.Q.'s of 50 to 70 
which put them in the slow learner (retarded) category, while 
Whites are ten times more likely to score 130 or over.  (15)  (16)
(18)  (23)

FACT # 7:  The U.S. government's PACE  examination, given to 
100,000 university graduates who are prospective professional or 
administrative civil-service employees each year, is passed with a 
score of 70 or above by 58% of the whites who take it but by only 
12% of the Negroes.  Among top scorers the difference between 
Negro and White performance is even more striking:  16% of the 
white applicants make scores of 90 or above, while only one-fifth 
of one percent of a Negro applicants score as high as 90--a 
White/Black success ration of 80/1.  (27)

FACT #8:  Differences between Negro and White children 
increase with chronological age,  the gap in performance being 
largest at the high school and college levels.  (31)  (26)

FACT #9:  White/Negro I.Q. differences are constantly excused 
as results of environmental variations.  but at least five studies that 
have attempted to equate socio-economic backgrounds of the two 
races indicate no significant change in relative results.  As 
environment improves, the Negro does better but so does the 
White.  The gap is not decreased.  (26)
    In fact, extensive research by DR. G.J. McGurk, associate 
Professor of Psychology at Villanove University, reveals that the 
gap in intelligence between Blacks and Whites INCREASES 
where socio-economic levels of both races are raised to the middle 
classes.  (18)

FACT #10:  In 1915, Dr. G.W. Ferfuson took 1000 school 
children in Virginia, divided them into 5 racial categories, and 
tested them for mental aptitude.
    On average. full-blooded Negroes scored 69.2% as high as 
Whites.  Three-quarter Negroes scored 73.0% as high as Whites.  
One-half Negroes scored 81.2% as high as Whites.  One-quarter 
Negroes scored 91.8% as high as Whites.
    All of these Blacks lived as and considered themselves 
"Negroes."  Their environments and "advantages" or 
disadvantages were exactly the same.  (14)  Also see (26)  pg 452.

FACT #11:  Results of the Army Beta test given by the U.S. 
Army to over 386,000 illiterate soldiers in WWI showed Negro 
draftees to be "inferior to the Whites on all types of tests used in 
the Army."  Additionally, tests were conducted upon pure 
Negroes, Mulattoes, and Quadroons.  It was found that "the 
lighter groups made better scores."  (14)

FACT #12:  Studies conducted with identical twins raised apart in 
radically different environments provide conclusive evidence that 
over-all influence of heredity exceeds that of environment in a 
ratio of about 3 to 1.  (41)

FACT #13:  Even when Blacks and Whites have the same 
backgrounds, in terms of family income and childhood 
advantages, Blacks still have average I.Q. scores 12 to 15 points 
lower than comparable Whites.  This includes cases where Black 
children have been adopted by White parents.  Their I.Q.s may be 
improved by environment, but they are still closer to their 
biological parents than their adoptive parents.  (3)  (15)  (26)

FACT #14:  Equalitarian ideologists often discount I.Q. test results 
with the excuse that they are culturally biased.  Nonetheless, NO 
ONE, not the NAACP nor the United Negro College Fund, nor 
NEA had been able to develop an intelligence test which shows 
Blacks and Whites scoring equally.  (15)  (42)  (3)

FACT # 15:  American Indians, who often live in conditions far 
worse than American Blacks during their entire lives, still 
consistently outscore them on I.Q. tests.  (3)  (27)

FACT #16:  The offspring of interracial marriages tend to have 
lower I.Q.s than the white parent.  (11)  (26)

THE NEGRO BRAIN

Fact #17:  Among human races numerous studies have been made 
of the comparative weight of White and Negro brains with results 
that fell within the range of about an 8-12 percent lower weight for 
the Negro brain.  Such studies have been conducted by Bean, 
Pearl, Vint, Tilney, Gordon, Todd, and others.  (23)  (27)

FACT #18:  In addition to the difference in brain weight, the 
Negro brain grows less after puberty than the white.  Though the 
Negro brain and nervous system mature faster than the white 
brain, its development is arrested at an earlier age which limits 
further intellectual advancement.   (22)  (27)

FACT #19:  The thickness of the supragranular layer (the outside 
layer) of the Negro brain is about 15 percent thinner, and its 
convolutions are fewer and more simple, on average, than that of 
the White brain.  (9)

FACT #20:  The frontal lobes of the Negro brain, responsible for 
abstract conceptional reasoning, are smaller relative to body 
weight, less fissured, and less complex than those of the White 
brain.  (9)  (27)  (23)  (22)

ANTHROPOLOGY

FACT #21:  The name Homo sapien was first used by the 18th 
Century Swedish botanist Carolus Linnaeus.  The word "sapien" 
means "wise."  The name was originally used to speak of the 
White man and synonymous with "europaeus."  As a result, many 
later taxonomists and geneticists believed that Negroes and other 
races should be classified as different species.
    In fact, Darwin declared in The Descent of Man that the 
varieties of mankind are so distinct that similar differences found 
in any other animal would warrant their classification in different 
species, if not different genera.  (39)

FACT #22:  For his mammoth work, The Origin of Races, 
Professor Carleton Coon, President of the American Association 
of Physical Anthropologists and the premier geneticist of the 
world, assembled massive evidence from geography, anatomy, 
genetics, physiology, comparative dentition, linguistics, 
archeology, and fossil records from 300 bone-bearing sites to 
verify his theory of pre-sapien racianation."  In other words, 
Homo erectus was divided by race even before evolution into 
Homo sapien stage.  (12)

FACT #23:  According to Dr. Coon, while the Caucasoid 
subspecies (the White race) was evolving in Europe, the Negro 
race was standing still on the evolutionary plane and is today no 
less than 200,000 years behind the European in skull and brain 
development.  (9)

FACT #24:  The Negro skull, in addition to having a smaller brain 
volume and thicker cranial bones than that of the White, is 
prognathous; i.e., the lower face projects forward, rather in the 
manner of an animal's muzzle.  In consequence, the Negro jaw is 
substantially longer, relative to its width, than the White jaw.  A 
feature of the Negro lower jaw is its retention of a vestige of the 
"simian shelf," a bony region immediately behind the incisors.  
The simian shelf is a distinguishing characteristic of apes, and it is 
absent in Whites.  (9)  (12)  (39)

FACT #25:  The skin of the Negro is thicker and possibly 
superior to the White's in the way it impedes the penetration of 
germs and in its protection from the ultraviolet rays of the sun.
(39)  (14)

FACT #26:  The dark color of the Negro is due to melanin 
pigment which is spread through every layer of the skin and is 
found even in the muscles and brain.  (9)  (27)

FACT #27:  An African dentist can tell a Negro's tooth from a 
white man's at a glance.  (14)

FACT #28:  Negroes have arms which are longer, relative to body 
height, than those of Whites.  This feature, together with their 
much thicker cranial bones, gives Black athletes an advantage over 
Whites in boxing.  The skeletal and muscular peculiarities of 
Negroes' lower limbs have given them considerable success as 
sprinters, but have left them relative undistinguished as distance 
runners.  (39)  (27)

FACT #29:  ADDITIONAL DIFFERENCES 
--The hair is black, crispy, and "woolly" in texture, it is flat and 
elliptical with no central canal or duct like the hair of Europeans. 
--The nose is thick, broad and flat, often turned up nostrils 
exposing the red inner lining of the mucous membrane similar to 
an ape. 
--The arms and legs of the Negro are relatively longer than the 
European.  The humerus is a trifle shorter and the forearm longer 
thereby approximating the simian form. 
--The eyes are prominent, iris black and the orbits large.  The eye 
often has a yellowish sclerotic coat over it like that of a gorilla. 
--The Negro has a shorter trunk the cross-section of the chest is 
more circular than whites.  The pelvis  is narrower and longer as it 
is in an ape. 
--The mouth is wide with very thick, large and protruding lips. 
--Negro skin has a thick superficial horny layer which resists 
scratching and impedes the penetration of germs. 
--The Negro has a larger and shorter neck akin to that of 
anthropoids. 
--The cranial sutures are more simple than in the white type and 
close together earlier. 
--The ears are roundish, rather small, standing somewhat high and 
detached thus approaching the simian form. 
--The Negro is more powerfully developed from the pelvis down 
and the white more powerfully developed in the chest. 
--The jaw is larger and stronger and protrudes outward which, 
along with  lower retreating forehead, gives a facial angle of 68 to 
70 degrees as opposed to a facial angle of 80 to 82 degrees for 
Europeans. 
--The hands and fingers are proportionally narrower and longer.  
The wrist and ankles are shorter and more robust. 
--The frontal and paricial bones of the cranium are less excavated 
and less capacious.  The skull is thicker especially on the sides. 
--The brain of the Negro on the average is 9 to 20% smaller than 
whites. 
--The teeth are larger and are wider apart than in the white race. 
--The three curvatures of the spine are less pronounced in the 
Negro than in the white and thus more characteristic of an ape. 
--The femur of the Negro is less oblique, the tibia (shin bone) 
more curved and bent forward, the calf of the leg high and but 
little developed. 
--The heel is broad and projecting, the foot long and broad but 
slightly arched causing flat soles, the great toe is shorter than in 
the white. 
--The two bones proper of the nose are occasionally united, as in 
apes.

FACT #30:  Blood group studies made during WWII suggest the 
American Negro gene pool is about 28% white.  --This despite all 
manner of institutional discrimination, social segregation, etc.
    Keep in mind that the results of test from true Black Africans 
would show even bigger differences from Whites.  (32)  (14)

CRIME

FACT #31:  The rate at which Blacks commit murder is thirteen 
times that of Whites;  Rape and assault, ten times.  These figures, 
as given by the F.B.I. reports, vary somewhat from year to year 
but fairly represent the trend for the past decade.  (27)  (6)  (13)

FACT #32:  According to the justice Dept, 1 in every 4 Black 
males between the ages of 20 and 29 is currently in prison or on 
probation or parole.  (32)  (6)  (3)

FACT #33:  Though only 12% of the U.S. population, Blacks 
commit more than half of all rapes and robberies and 60% of all 
murders in the U.S.  (32)  (27)  (6)

FACT #34:  Approximately 50% of all Black males will be 
arrested and charged with a serious felony during their lifetime.
(27)

FACT #35:  A Black person is 56 TIMES more likely to attack a 
White person than Vice Versa.  (3)  (32)

FACT #36:  Black rapists choose White victims over half  
(54.9%) of the time,  30X as often as Whites choose Blacks.
(2)  (32)  (28)

FACT #37:  The annual report from the Department of justice 
shows that when Whites commit violence they do it to Blacks 
2.4% of the time.  Blacks, on the other hand, choose White 
victims MORE THAN HALF the time.  (3)

FACT #38:  In New York City, any White is over 300 TIMES 
MORE LIKELY to be assaulted by a gang of Blacks than is a 
Black by a gang of Whites.  (32)

FACT #39:  Many people argue that high Black incarceration 
rates show that police center enforcement at Black crimes and 
ignore white-collar crimes.  However, Blacks commit a 
disproportionate number of white-collar offenses as well.  In 
1990, Blacks were nearly 3 times as likely to be arrested for 
forgery, counterfeiting, and embezzlement as Whites.  (32)  
(6)

FACT #40:  Many people believe that crime is a product of 
poverty and lack of "advantages."  However, the District of 
Columbia, which enjoys the highest average annual salaries and is 
second only to Alaska in personal income per capita, leads the 
nation in just about every category of crime including murder, 
robbery, aggravated assault, and vehicle theft.
    D.C. also has the country's strictest gun control, highest police 
costs per capita, highest ration of police and correctional officers 
per citizen, and highest rate of incarceration.  Its permanent 
population is over 80% Black.
    West Virginia, which has the nation's lowest crime rate, suffers 
>from  chronic poverty and has the highest unemployment in the 
U.S.  It also has the fewest police per capita.
    West Virginia is over 96% White.  (33)

THE BLACK FAMILY

FACT #41  46% of inner city Black men between the ages of 16 
and 62 are unemployed.  (27)

FACT #42:  More than 66% of the children of Negroes are born 
out of wedlock.  Per capita, their illegitimacy rate is ten times that 
of Whites.  (32)  (27)

FACT #43:  Blacks are four and a half times more likely than 
Whites to be on welfare.  (32)

FACT #44:  More than 35% of all Black men in U.S. Cities are 
drug or alcohol abusers.  (27)

BEAUTY

FACT #45:  The January l986 issue of the journal of Ethnic and 
Racial Studies, "Skin Color Preference, Sexual Dimorphism and 
Sexual Selection: a case of Gene-Culture Co-evolution?"  by Peter 
Frost and Pierre Van der Herghe,  stated that in any given race, the 
women tend to have lighter complexions than the men.  Using 
standard ethnographic files from 51 societies on five continents 
which have recorded their preference for human skin color, the 
study found that 30 preferred lighter women and 14 preferred 
lighter women and lighter men.
    The cultures of India, China, Brazil and Bali, as well as the 
Arabs and Negroes regard the lightest women as the most 
beautiful.  --perpetuating the aesthetic appeal of the ivory-skinned, 
rosy-cheeked, blue-eyed, blond "nordic ideal" of feminine beauty-
-even though they themselves do not possess the genetic capacity 
to reproduce such an organism. 
    Over time, the study said, the upper classes of all races have 
become lighter-skinned than their fellow countrymen because they 
have repeatedly skimmed off fairer women from the lower classes.    
(Also see #11)

FACT #46:  Scientific research on what constitutes human beauty, 
in which 300 judges of various backgrounds were shown portrait 
photographs and asked to rate the beauty of the individual's face, 
has revealed that nordic Whites are universally recognized as the 
most attractive humans, even by Blacks.
     The judges were instructed to evaluate the faces solely on his 
or her "personal standards of beauty and not to consider popular 
norms."
     The results of the study "Age, Sex, Race, and the Perception of 
Facial Beauty."  Developmental Psychology, 5, Nov., 1971, pp 
433-439, are reprinted below.

GROUP BEAUTY RATINGS IN CROSS AND CROSS STUDY 

JUDGES'                   GROUP GIVEN
CHARACTERISTICS          HIGHEST RATING
---------------          --------------
Age 7 white males         white adolescent males 
Age 7 black males         white adolescent males 
Age 7 white females       white adolescent females 
Age 7 black females     3-way tie:
                          black adolescent females, 
                          white adolescent females, 
                          white female children 
Age 12 white males        white adolescent females
Age 12 black males        white adolescent females 
Age 12 white females      white adolescent females 
Age 12 black females      white adolescent females 
Age 17 white males        white adolescent females 
Age 17 black males        white adolescent females 
Age 17 white females      white adolescent females 
Age 17 black females      white adolescent females 
Adult white males         white adolescent females 
Adult black males         white adolescent females 
Adult white females       white adolescent males 
Adult black females       white adolescent females

FACT #47:  In experiments in which Black children have been left 
to themselves with White and Black dolls, it has been found tha 
most of the them would rather play with White dolls.  This is true 
all over the world.  Even in such places as Tobago.  (32)  (22)  (23)


AMERICAN HISTORY 

FACT #48:  The Declaration of Independence, which contains the 
oft-repeated phrase ". . . all men are created equal . . ." was written 
by Thomas Jefferson, who owned about 200 slaves at the time and 
never set any of them free, including the mulattoes and quadroons.
    Jefferson's words certainly had no reference to Negroes, who at 
that time had no place in American society except as property.
(27)  (38)  (31)

FACT #49:  The Constitution was written by and for 'We the 
people" and dedicated to "ourselves and our posterity," All of the 
55 delegates that met in Philadelphia to draft the Constitution and 
all of the members of the 13 state conventions that ratified it were 
of the White race.  (38)

WEBSTER'S DICTIONARY OF 1828 defines Posterity as:
POSTERITY.  1. Descendants; children, children's children, etc. 
indefinitely; the race that proceeds from a progenitor.  2. In a 
general sense, succeeding generations; opposed to ancestors. . .


FACT #50:  The 14th Amendment is invalid for the following 
reasons:
  -It was never ratified by three-fourth of all the States in the 
Union according to Article 5 of the U.S. Constitution.  Out of 37 
States, 16 had rejected it.
  -Many of the States who were counted as ratifying it, were 
compelled to do so under duress of military occupation.  Any legal act 
entered into under force duress, and coercion is automatically null and 
void.
  -The fact that 23 Senators had been unlawfully excluded from 
the U.S. Senate, shows that the Joint Resolution proposing the Amendment 
was not submitted to or adopted by a constitutional Congress.
  -The intent of the 14th Amendment is repugnant to the original 
U.S. Constitution and the Organic Law of the land.  It did not, and 
could not, repeal anything that was part of the Organic Law.  Therefore 
the principles of precedent and stare decisis render it void.  (23)
     
FACT #51:  In Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation of 
Sept. 1862 he said:
    "I have urged the colonization of the Negroes, (back to Africa), 
and I shall continue.  My Emancipation Proclamation was linked 
with this plan (of colonization).  There is no room for two distinct 
races of White men in America, much less for two distinct races 
of Whites and Blacks.
     . . . I can think of no greater calamity than the assimilation of 
the negro into our social and political life as our equal . . .
    Within twenty years we can peacefully colonize the Negro . . . 
under conditions in which he can rise to the full measure of 
manhood.  This he can never do here.  We can never attain the 
ideal union our fathers dreamed, with millions of an alien, inferior 
race among us, whose assimilation is neither possible nor 
desirable." (27)

FACT #52:  Lincoln actually proposed an amendment to the 
constitution that would've authorized congress to recolonize all 
freed Blacks back to Africa.  On Aug. 15, l962, Congress did 
appropriate over half a million dollars for that purpose.  
Thousands of Negroes had been shipped back when Lincoln was 
shot.  (27)

WASHINGTON D.C.

FACT #53: 
 The District of Columbia, which is approximately 70% Black, 
leads the U.S. in many areas:
  -  The nations highest crime rates
  -  Strictest gun control
  -  Highest incarceration rates
  -  Highest birthrate
  -  Highest death rate
  -  Highest rate of federal assistance per capita
  -  Highest number of welfare recipients per capita
  -  Highest rate of illegitimacy
  -  Highest high school dropout rate even though its teachers are 
the highest paid in the U.S.
  -  Highest rate of ghonnorrhea and syphilis
  -  Highest incidence of AIDS
      (33)  (32)

PORTUGAL

FACT #54:  Populated by White stock, the nation of Portugal 
rose in four centuries to be the wealthiest most powerful country 
in the world.  A great commercial and maritime power, it had large 
colonies in Asia, Africa, and America.  Its seamen were the first to 
explore western Africa and they brought back hundreds of Negro 
slaves.  By 1550, at the height of Portugal's power, one-tenth of its 
population were Blacks.
    Today, Portugal's population is described as one of the most 
homogeneous in Europe, having slowly absorbed the Negro gene 
pool.  As of l975 it had lost all of its outside territories.  Its 
workers are the lowest paid in Europe and they have the highest 
rate of illiteracy and a high infant mortality rate.  In terms of art, 
literature, music, science and philosophy the "new" Portugal has 
produced virtually nothing in 100 years and by most standards is 
the most backward nation in Europe. *Keep in mind that the 
Black population of the U.S. is approximately 13%.  (27)

HAITI

FACT #55:  The Republic of Haiti, the only completely Black 
republic in the Western Hemisphere also happens to be the 
poorest country in the Western Hemisphere.  It also has the 
lowest life expectancy, highest illiteracy, lowest per capita 
consumption of newsprint, lowest per capita GNP, and the lowest 
level of political stability.  (27)

FACT #56:  Haiti once had a promising future.  Before 1789 as a 
French colony under White rule, San Domingo (Haiti) was as rich 
or richer in productivity as all the 13 American Colonies 
combined. 
    It was considered the "crown jewel" of the French colonial 
system, and was in fact the most prosperous colony anywhere in 
the world.  Populated by 40,000 Whites, 27,000 freed Mulattoes, 
and 450,000 Black slaves and with a bountiful climate and 
productive soil, it supplied all of France and half of Europe with 
sugar, coffee, and cotton.
    But in 1791, the French government issued a decree ordering 
Haiti to give the vote to the Mulattoes, and soon after another 
ordering freedom for all the slaves.  This resulted in a bloody civil 
war in which the entire White population (about 40,000 
Frenchmen) was murdered, down to the last man, woman, and 
child.  Rape, decapitation, and mutilation were committed almost 
universally upon their bodies.  (22)  (23)

FACT #57:  After the Blacks massacred the last of the White 
population in 1804, Haiti remained a part of Santa Domingo, until 
1844 when it became a separate "republic."  Between 1844 and 
1915 only one Haitian president completed his term in office.  
Fourteen were ousted by armed uprisings, one was blown up, one 
was poisoned and another was hacked to pieces by a mob.
    Between 1908 and 1915 the revolutions and assassinations 
increased so rapidly that a United States military occupation was 
needed to restore order.  This lasted from 1915 to 1934.  
Thereafter followed twelve years of rule by a Mulatto elite which 
ended in the resumption of control by the Black military in 1946.  
Since then wholesale corruption and political murder have been 
the rule.  (23)

INDIA

FACT #58:  India's Negroid peoples have been subjected to 
numerous White invasions for over 5000 years, prompting the 
rise and fall of one civilization after another as the White invaders 
became absorbed into the non-White masses.  Then, about 1800 
B.C. Aryans again invaded from the northwest, this time 
establishing a rigid caste ("varna." meaning color) system of 
White supremacy which eventually evolved into an integral part of 
the Hindu religion.  Interracial mixing was banned and punishable 
by death.  (5)  (37)

FACT #59:  Led by an Aryan ruling class, Classical India 
blossomed into a great culture, giving expression to philosophy, 
poetry, science, mathematics, and literature.  The land prospered as 
never before --or after. 

FACT #60:  The caste system lasted about 2,000 years   (probably 
longer than any civilization under similar racial circumstances.)  
However, eventually the castes broke down due to miscegenation 
and by modern times virtually no pure Whites were remaining.
(39)  (37)  (10)

FACT #61:  Today, India has 834 million people who speak 150 
different languages and dialects.  When the annual rainfall is 
insufficient, they die of starvation at a rate of 2,000,000 to 
6,000,000 per year.  India has the highest birthrate in Asia, one of 
the lowest per capita incomes in the world, and an illiteracy rate 
close to 70%.  (35)  (33)

EGYPT

FACT #62:  Ancient Egypt was founded and built by 
Mediterranean Caucasians as far back as 4500 B.C.  Egypt's 
period of greatness was from 3400 B.C. to 1800 B.C. and was 
characterized by its amazing architecture, pyramids, temples, and 
mastery of mathematics and engineering, the remnants of which 
are still evident today.  The White Egyptians pioneered medicine, 
chemistry, astronomy, and law; In many cases, their achievements 
remain unequalled.  (37)  (39)  (21)

FACT #63:  But, about 3400 B.C. Egypt civilization began to 
spread up the Nile River, bringing it in close contact with the black 
Nubians to the south. Soon they were using Blacks for slave labor 
and Egypt became history's first melting pot.  (39)  (10)  (14)

FACT # 64:  In time the infusion of Negro blood worked itself up 
>from  the bottom of Egyptian society.  The slaves were eventually 
freed, received political equality, and took posts of authority in 
government.  (10)  (37)

FACT #65:  By the time of King Tut (1370-1352 B.C.) even the 
ruling classes had been mongrelized and Egypt began a tailspin 
downward.  Today, the once-mighty Egypt is very much a Third 
World country, having lost its art, its medicine, its architectural 
ability, and its position in world affairs.  (10)  (37)

   The absurd notion that Ancient Egypt was a product of Negro 
ingenuity is now being widely disseminated in the schools.  
Though scholars know this is a blatant lie, they justify the 
deception by assuming it will boost the "self-esteem" of Black 
children.

SOUTH AFRICA  
    (Note:  These facts will most likely change drastically 
    now that South Africa has fallen under black rule.)

FACT #66:  White people have lived in South Africa much longer 
than Negroes.  There have been White settlements in South Africa 
for over 300 years, about the same length of time Europeans have 
lived in North America.  Even 150 years after the first colonies 
around Capetown, at the beginning of the 19th Century, there still 
were no Blacks within 500 miles.  The Blacks wandered in from 
central Africa later on, possibly fleeing the slave trade or due to 
famine.  In fact, most of South Africa's Blacks were born in other 
countries.  (29)  (8)  (14)

FACT #67:  South Africa is by far the wealthiest and most 
advanced country in Africa, producing nearly 75% of the 
continent's Gross National Product.  It is almost completely self-
sufficient so boycotts have little affect upon its economy.  In fact 
most of Africa is dependent upon South Africa.
    South Africa is governed by a Western parliamentary republic 
and strictly segregated racially.
    South Africa grants complete self-government to the Blacks in 
their own areas of the country.  (29)  (8)  (14)

FACT #68:  Though South Africa is perpetually criticized by the 
world press for its racial separatism, its Blacks live better than the 
Blacks of any other African country and are multiplying rapidly 
and healthily.
     87% of Black welfare costs are being paid by the White man.  
This includes food, clothing, training, housing, education an health 
care.  --even old age pensions.  (14)

FACT #69:  Thousands of South African Blacks graduate from 
college every year, more than three times as many as in the rest of 
Africa combined.  Every Black child is within walking distance of 
a primary school.  Africa's largest hospital, which serves Blacks 
almost exclusively and performs over 1800 operations per month, 
is in South Africa.  (14)

FACT #70:  The Blacks of South Africa own more cars than do 
all the citizens of the Soviet Union.  (29)

FACT #71:  South Africa has more Black doctors, lawyers, 
professional people, and millionaires than  all of the rest of the 
world combined.  (8)

FACT #72:  In fact, conditions are "so bad" for Blacks in South 
Africa that the country has a tremendous problem with illegal 
Black immigration, having over one million illegal foreign 
workers.  (14)  (29)

ICELAND

FACT #73-75:  Iceland, the only all-White nation in the world, 
has the world's highest literacy rate.  100%.
    It is an island of cooled volcanic magma, located Just south of 
the Arctic Circle.  It has no coal, no fuel, no timber, no mineral 
wealth or natural resources, and no navigable rivers.  75% of the 
interior is uninhabitable and only about 1% of the land is arable.  
It is the youngest nation in Europe and one of the most isolated 
countries in the world.
    Nonetheless, Iceland is #2 in the world in life expectancy and 
has one of the world's highest standards of living, in terms of per 
capita income.
    It has tremendous medical facilities and a thriving publishing 
business.  Virtually every family has a telephone.  Upon 
graduation from high school, each Icelandic student has learned 
five languages.  (33)

MARTIN LUTHER KING

FACT #75-77:  On Jan. 31, 1977, Martin Luther King's FBI 
records were sealed by court order until the year 2027 because, as 
his wife said, "its release would destroy his reputation"
    These records are rumored to contain instances of bizarre 
sexual perversion and homosexuality, and proof that King was 
under the direct orders of Soviet spies and financed by the 
Communist Party. 

FACT #78:  The Wall Street Journal (Nov.9, 1990) disclosed that 
Stanford University editors of  The Papers of Martin Luther King 
Jr. have long known that King was guilty of plagiarism in his l955 
Boston University doctoral thesis, having lifted significant 
portions from the works of other writers and graduate students.

FACT #79:  Martin Luther King frequently enjoyed prostitutes 
and paid for them with his church's money.
    Still, congress has voted to make King's birthday a national 
holiday, in most places replacing Columbus Day or Washington's 
Birthday as an official observance.

FACT #80:  Almost every state in the union has a King holiday, 
and almost every city has a King Boulevard or King Civic Center.  
Yet the electoral evidence suggests that Americans will almost 
always vote down honors for King when given a chance.  (41)

MISCELLANEOUS

FACT #81:  The entire continent of Africa, perhaps Earth's richest 
land, accounts for only 3% of world trade.  (27)

FACT #82-84:  Almost all Blacks who have been leaders in fields 
other than athletics or music have had some White ancestry:  
Fredick Douglas, W.E.B. Dubois,  Booker T. Washington,  
George Washington Carver, Alex Hailey, Thurgood Marshall, 
Bryant Gumbell, Colin Powell, Carl Rowan, Ed Bradley, Doug 
Wilder, etc.
    According to Dr. E.B. Reuter, ". . . Of successful and best 
known men that the Negro race has produced, at least thirteen-
fourteenths are men of mixed blood.  (27)  (21)

FACT #85:  Blacks are 50 times more likely to have syphilis than 
Whites.  (32)

FACT #86:  Twice as many Blacks as Whites receive 
dishonorable discharge from the U.S. military.  (32)

FACT #87:  A White woman is 15 times more likely to contract 
AIDS by engaging in sex with a Negro than with a White 
heterosexual.  (U.S. Centers for Disease Control) 

FACT #88:  90% of U.S. children with AIDS are Black or 
Hispanic.  (36)

FACT # 89-92:  In l950, American schools were among the best 
in the world.  However, vocal elements within our society 
demanded that the public schools take on a social engineering role 
as well as an educational one.  Violent disruptions of American 
education were ordered by the Supreme Court for the purpose of 
breaking down racial barriers.  For 30 years, American schools 
have diverted enormous resources into forced integration, quotas, 
and bussing operations.
     (Few people realize how expensive bussing is.  Annual cost 
may run into tens of billions of dollars.  In l990 California alone 
was spending $500 million per year on integration.  Many school 
districts spend a quarter or more of their budgets on 
transportation.  In Milwaukee alone and in a single school year, 
30,000 staff hours were diverted into calculating the race of 
students to attend the various schools.)
    The results?  Today's students rank at the very bottom 
worldwide in science and math, some 40% of American adults are 
functionally illiterate, and standardized test scores have declined 
steadily for both Whites and Blacks.  Today the average White 
still scores 200 points higher on the combined SAT than the 
average Black.
    Americans spend more on education than any other country in 
the world and have the worst results.  Massive White flight to 
escape racial zoning has reduced the tax base of every major 
American city.
    In l983, after nearly two generations of racial experimentation 
to promote equality, the research arm of the Dept. of Education 
could not produce a single study that showed Black children were 
learning appreciably better after desegregation.  (25)  (20)  (32)

FACT #93:  In Black Africa the average ruler lasts 7 months.
  (22)  (27)  (7)

FACT #94:  By 1995, a third of U.S. students will be non-Whites 
and Whites will be a minority in the school districts of 5 states.
(32)

FACT #95:  Dr. William Shockley, Nobel prize winner for his 
work in the invention of the transistor and renowned geneticist as 
Stanford University, said, "The major cause for American 
Negroes' hereditary is origin and thus not remedial to a major 
degree by improvement in environment."

FACT #96:  In 1930, about 33% of the world was White.  Today, the 
U.N. estimates that only about 9.5% of the world's population is 
Caucasian.  This percentage is falling rapidly.  (34)  (27)

FACT #97:  Every race has an equal capacity to learn and 
contribute to civilization and any differences are caused by 
prejudice and racism.  The fact that white skins are associated with 
civilization is merely a quirk of fortune and coincidence.  Any 
attempt to distinguish the races is motivated by paranoia and 
hatred.  We must prevent any investigation into the subject and 
work to melt society together into a receless, nationless, 
harmonious utopia. (?)

FACT #98:  In 1988 there were 9,406 cases of Black-on-White 
rape and fewer than 10 cases of White on Black rape in the U.S.
(32)

FACT #99:  For the book INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL 
ACHIEVEMENT, by Raymond Cattell, three distinguished 
American scholars compare massive evidence of national I.Q. 
score averages worldwide and warn against the decline of any 
nation whose population reflects declining intelligence.  Taking 
into consideration the differential birthrates of American ethnic 
stocks, they concluded that American ability is declining rapidly.
(21)

FACT #100:  The American taxpayers have spent over $2.5 
TRILLION trying to upgrade Blacks since the l960's.  (6)

FACT #101:  QUOTES
     "The Negroes' rude ignorance has never invented any effectual 
weapons of defense or destruction: they appear incapable of 
forming any extensive plans of government or conquest: and the 
obvious inferiority of their mental faculties has been discovered 
and abused by the nations of the temperate zone."  --Edward 
Gibbon, the great historian and author of THE DECLINE AND 
FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE, (V.III, pg. 277)
     "Wherever you find the Negro everything is going down 
around him, and wherever you find the White man you see 
everything around him improving."  --Robert E. Lee, to Col. 
Thomas H. Carter, May, l965

-----------------
Recommended books for further study:

  * "The Origins of Race and Civilization" by Charles A. 
Weisman.   $8.00 from Scriptures For America, P.O. Box 766-c, 
LaPorte, CO 80535.
    "The greatest controversies today seem to center around the 
races of man, the origin of which is battled over by two concepts - 
"evolutionism" and "creationism."  But in all the debates, it is 
strange no one has suggested that BOTH of these concepts may 
be in error.  It is the intent of this material to reveal the true origin 
and nature of the different races and civiliazations occording to 
'immutable' evidence.  In doing so it will be shown that both of the 
forenamed concepts are inconsistent and illogical in much of what 
they say, and that they both have been manipulated so as to 
produce the 'same' erroneous results regarding our origins."  pg. 4 
(preface)
     "Since God is the source of science as well as His Word 
recorded in the Bible, it is impossible for the two to be in conflict 
with one another." -pg. 5
     "The word 'species' is in itself an anti-evolution term since the 
very meaning of the word refers to something specific and fixed." 
-pg. 9
     "Natural selection and the survival of the fittest are natural 
processes, they are not evolutionary ones."  -pg. 14
     "Nature has a way of preventing cross mating between species 
and rejecting the hybrids that do occur." -pg. 18
     " The Bible, verified by the geological record, reveals the 
pattern of creation God has used."  -pg. 23
     "All evidence available from comparative ethnology, linguistics, 
and prehistoric archaeology indicates a long seperation of the 
principal races of man."  -pg. 38
     "From the Egyptian monuments we know that there were 
various races of man in existence during the three centuries that 
followed the Flood."  -pg. 55
     "All scripture evidence indicates Adam was created a white 
man."  -pg. 57
     "Inequality and discrimination, like segregation, are Divine 
precepts." -pg 80
     "The weight of scientific studies and research on the subject of 
the races of man seems to be in favor of classifying them as 
distinct species." - pg. 86
     "Prolificacy of distinct species, inter se, is now proved to be no 
test of COMMON ORIGIN." -pg. 128
     "A study of civilizations throughout history is a study of the 
history of the Adamic race - the builders of civilization."  -pg 131.
     "3,000 years before the Europeans ever raised a single 
cathedral, their ancestors had already constructed pyramids in 
Egypt, Stonehenge in Britain, and palaces at Crete."  -pg. 153

                SOURCES
                -------

  1.  African Business Magazine, Dec. '91
  2.  American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 92, pg 822+
  3.  American Renaissance, Dec. '90, Box 2504, Menlo Park, CA 
94026
  4.  American Sociological Review, Vol 45, pg. 859 
  5.  Basham, A.L., The Wonder That Was India, Grove Press, 
New York, NY 1954
  6.  Buckley, William F. syndicated column, Jan. 5. 1993
  7.  "But What about Africa?"  Harper's, May '90
  8.  "The Christian Heritage of South Africa Under Attack!", 
Peter Hammond, Herald the Coming, Dec. '92.
  9.  Coon, Carleton S.  The Origin of Races, 1962, Alfred A. 
Knopf
  10.  Fagan, Myron C.  How the Greatest White Nations Were 
Mongrelized - Then Negroized, Sons of Liberty Books.
  11.  Fields, Dr. Ed,  The Dangers of Interracial Marriage, PO 
Box 1211, Marietta, GA 30061
  12.  Howells, William.  Mankind So Far, Doubleday, Garden 
City, NY 1945.
  13.  Harris, Marvin, 1981.  Why Nothing Works.  Simon & 
Schuster, New York, NY
  14.  Jacob, A.  White Man, Think Again!  1965, publ. by author.
  15.  Jensen, Arthur R.  Bias in Mental Testing, The Free Press, 
New York 1980
  16.  Jensen, Arthur R.  Straight Talk About Mental Tests, the 
Free Press.  (Macmillan) New York, 1981
  17.  McCall's, May '92, pg 76
  18.  McGurk, Frank, "A Scientist's Report on Race Differences."  
U.S. News and World Report, Sept. 21, 1956.  Washington, D.C.
  19.  Pearson, Roger,  Eugenics and Race, 1966, Noontide Press
  20.  Pearson, Roger.  Race, Intelligence, and Bias in Academe, 
Scott-Townsend Publishers, N.W. Washington, D.C.
  21.  Pendell, Elmer,  Sex Versus Civilization, Noontide Press.
  22.  Putnam, Carleton.  Race and Reason, 1961, Howard Allen 
Press, Cape Canaveral, FL
  23.  Putnam, Carleton.  Race and Reality, a Search for Solutions, 
1967, Howard Allen, Box 76, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920
  24.  Putnam, Carleton.  A Study in Racial Realities, an address at 
the University of California at Davis, Dec. 17, 1964
  25.  Scott, Ralph.  Education and Ethnicity:  The U.S. 
Experiment in School Integration, Scott-Townsend.  Washington, 
D.C. 1989
  26.  Shuey, Audrey H., The Testing of Negro Intelligence, Social 
Science Press, New York, 1966
  27.  Simpson, William Gayley.  Which Way Western Man?  
1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535, Washington, D. C. 
20007
  28.  Social Forces, Vol. 69, pg.1+, Sept. '90
  29.  "South Africa: Time to Choose Sides"  Soldier of Fortune, 
Dec. '89.
  30.  Snyderman, Mark, and Rothman, Stanely.  The IQ 
Controversy, the Media and Public Policy.  Transaction 
Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ 1990.
  31.  Stell v Savannah-Chattham County Board of Education, 
U.S. District Court, Southern Georgia, May 13, 1963.
  32.  Taylor, Jared,  Paved with Good Intentions:  The Failure of 
Race Relations in Contemporary America.  1992, Carrol & Graf.  
New York, NY
  33.  World Almanacs, '88, '89, '90, '91, '92
  34  United Nations World Census, 1990
  35.  Van Loon, Henrick, 1940, Van Loon's Geography, Garden 
City Publ.
  36.  The Voice, Feb. 27, 1990.
  37.  Waddell, L. A. The Makers of Civilization, 1929, Angriff 
Press, Hollywood, CA
  38.  Weisman, Charles A.  America:  Free, White and Christian, 
1989, SFA, Box 766-c, LaPorte, CO 80535
  39.  Weisman, Charles A.  The Origins of Race and Civilization, 
1990, SFA
  40.  Weyl, Nathaniel.  The Geography of American 
Achievement, Scott-Townsend, Washington, D.C. 1989.
  41.  Martin Luther King (Man Behind the Myth) by Des Griffin.

-------------------------------------------------
Get the "Identity.faq" and many other files by
anon. FTP from:    ftp.netcom.com /pub/SF/SFA
Scriptures for America files are also available by WWW:
  http://nyx10.cs.du.edu:8001/~nmonagha/arc.html

-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|   For unique political commentary & Christian views        Rick Savage    | 
|     Anonymous FTP:  ftp.netcom.com  - pub/SF/SFA           PO Box 5251    |
|   To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file       Denver, CO 80217 |
|       In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help.                 (u)SA       |


From rsavage@netcom.com Sun Jun 18 17:01:16 PDT 1995
Article: 5794 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!Sunserver.insinc.net!news.Direct.CA!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: White_America
Message-ID: 
Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 05:31:23 GMT
Lines: 1145
Sender: rsavage@netcom12.netcom.com

From:    ftp.netcom.com /pub/SF/SFA
-----------------------------------

      WHITE AMERICA
How Civilization Was Built
   -------------------
   Summary of the book
  by Earnest Sevier Cox
   -------------------

      Introduction
   by Dr. E.R. Fields

     This is the title of the greatest race book ever written.  
Unfortunately it has long been out of print and is not available in 
any library.  The remarkable and far seeing author was Earnest 
Sevier Cox.  He was born on Jan. 24, l880 in Knoxville, Tenn. 
and this book was published in l937.  Cox proved that all 
civilization stems from the White Race.  Also, that interbreeding 
with lower races always destroys civilization. 

     Cox was not recognized for his greatness during his lifetime 
but what he wrote in l937 has turned out to be a prophecy of the 
racial problems Western civilization faces today.  Thousands of 
years ago the same racial crisis plagued Egypt, India and more 
recently Haiti, Portugal, Brazil, Puerto Rico and other countries. 
Cox maintains that maintaining the purity of the White Race is far 
more important than a nation's economic condition or whether or 
not it has the raw materials to develop, etc.  He says that nothing 
can stop the eventual amalgamation of two races except the 
physical separation of those races.  Even Segregation is but a 
temporary solution because sexual contact of the lowest lust 
driven Whites will mix with the mulatto and even the full-blooded 
Negro. 

     Cox did not "hate" blacks and in fact actually worked with the 
great black leader Marcus Garvey who organized millions of 
Negroes in America.  Garvey's plan was to take them all back to 
Africa to form a new nation.  Garvey was framed by the U.S. 
government at the behest of big business who wanted to keep the 
blacks here for cheap labor.  He was thrown into prison and then 
deported to Jamaica and never allowed to return to the U.S. again.  

     Earnest Cox uphold the right of the Negro to develop his own 
society but insists that it must be within his own separate nation.  
During the l920s and 30s, Cox toured America speaking publicly 
on his racial discoveries which were developed after a life time of 
study and world-wide travel.  His meetings were often canceled or 
disrupted.  Not by Negroes, but by left-wing political forces and 
big business elements who wanted to keep the Negro here to be 
exploited as cheap labor or for their controlled block vote. 


Problems caused by Negroes 

     Cox clearly lays out the argument that the very existence of 
blacks in our presence will lead to high taxes, crime, riots and the 
deterioration of our cities.  He said this in l937 - do we not bear 
witness to this today?  Cox graduated from Vanderbilt University 
and the University of Chicago.  His studies were mostly devoted 
to the "colored problem."  He then sought funds  to finance a 
world-wide tour to: 1) Observe the traits of other races.  2) How 
other nations treat the Negro.  3)  Make a study of Negro 
governments. 4) Study the effect of the Negro race upon White 
society. 

     Cox was shocked when he learned that there was no university 
or foundation willing to finance such an important expedition.  He 
therefore set off on a six-year tour of the world at his own 
expense.  He spent two years in South Africa, visited colonial and 
black nations in Africa.  He traveled up the Nile to Egypt.  From 
there he traveled to India, Southeast Asia, the Philippines, 
Australia, New Zealand and South America. 


Cox's Legacy To Us

     "White America" was delayed because of World War One in 
which Cox served in Europe and observed Negro troops first 
hand.  Earnest Sevier Cox was an original thinker and one of the 
first to recognize the relationship between race and the 
maintenance of civilization.  When the book was published it 
became an "underground best seller"    but was shunned by book 
reviewers and book stores.  It was sent to every member of 
Congress and Mississippi's famous Sen. Theodore G. Bilbo 
quoted from it.  Cox formed the "Anglo-saxon Clubs of America" 
and lectured widely on the urgent necessity to preserve the purity 
of the White Race.  Cox passed away on April 26, 1966, at age 86 
in Richmond, Va.  He is buried in Arlington National Cemetery. 


Important notice:  

     The following text is summarized from the original 200 page 
book "White America."  Wherever the word "Note" appears there 
follows comments by this editor.)


     Race friction is not local but is world wide.  It exists wherever 
two different races live together in the same country.  To urge the 
White people to preserve their own identity is not a superficial 
desire.  It is a primary necessity if civilization is to continue.  
Preserving the White race is to promote its own progress and 
impart its achievements to the backward races.  Many non-
scientific thinkers grudgingly acknowledge the age long 
ascendancy of the White race and make lame excuses for the lack 
of progress on the part of the Negro and mongrel races.  They 
cannot answer the question:  "If the White race has retained its 
relative position of superiority over the non-White races for six 
thousand years what reason do we have to suppose that this will 
change in the future?"   

     The "color problem" goes much deeper than just the pigment 
of ones skin.  Culture is created by the brain matter of a particular 
race.  When the quality of that mind is diluted by interbreeding 
with colored subjects, leaving a mix-breed population heir to the 
pure White, the result is arrested development, stagnation and 
eventual collapse.  Colored races will gladly avail themselves of 
the opportunity to mate with the White.  Gloomy consideration 
shows that sixty centuries of race history have proven that the 
White people at no time or place in history have remained white 
when in prolonged contact with colored races. 

      This, then, is the essence of the color problem - the difficulty 
of preserving the culturally fit when in contact with the culturally 
unfit.  There are many economic and political problems but the 
fundamental problem is to preserve the breed from which all 
progress issues.  Out propositions:

   1)  The White race has founded all civilizations
   2)  The White race remaining White has not lost a civilization.
   3)  When the White race becomes mixed it has not retained
       any civilization.


Ancient White Civilizations

       It is our objective to show that ancient civilizations whose 
origins have been ascribed to colored races were actually 
developed directly out of the creative ingenuity and energy of the 
White people.  This will include India, China, Ethiopia, Japan, etc. 

       Written record cover but a short last chapter in human 
history.  To grasp the results of contact by races, it is necessary to 
push back the curtain of history and trace earlier events.  
Prehistoric migrations of the Whites since the dawn of time 
carried with them the germs of intellect and culture which would 
later develop. 

       When races are in permanent contact, there is blood 
amalgamation creating a mongrel race.  However the language, 
carvings, statues, and monuments remain to prove that the White 
race once build the civilization.  The White man has always been in 
motion, restless, daring, seeking unknown lands and dominating 
other peoples.  


Civilization Begins 

       Civilization dawned along the Nile and Euphrates.  Early 
Aryans ventured out to Greece, Rome and Carthage.  To the East 
they traveled to India and on to Asia.  These race movements can 
easily be followed by skeletal remains, skull formations, 
implements, burial mounds, etc.  A sign of the ancient White man 
was his burial cell and block (which led to today's vault and 
tombstone.)  J. McMillan Brown calls them: a Caucasian track 
across the earth."    Renown British ethnologist Prof. A.H. Kean 
wrote:  "These neo-lithic monuments, all of the stone cell and 
block types are found in Asia, Iran, Syria, Palestine, Arabia, 
Northern Africa, Ethiopia, the Crimea, the British Isles, and 
China."  This megalithic engineering is not found among the 
yellow or black races.  Water was a barrier to the African Negro 
(who never even developed a sail).  The Whites were the only race 
never deterred by the ocean wave.  The White man of the stone age 
reached the Pacific at two points two thousand miles apart. 


Mongrel Remnants

       Often when two races come in contact with the other the 
stronger will expel the weaker from its territory.  If this does not 
take place the two races adjust to one another and interracial 
breeding occurs.  Thus the leading race loses its specialized 
characteristics.  This is a biological law which cannot be altered by 
educational programs or legislative decrees.


White Egypt 

      Sir Harry Johnston. the foremost authority on Egypt, in his 
book "History of Egypt," says this was a White nation!  Early 
Egyptians recognized that inter-breeding with the Negroes to the 
south in Nubia would dilute their race.  Through race-mixing the 
decay would eventually destroy their civilization. 

       They were divided into two nations - Upper Egypt and Lower 
Egypt.  The first Pharaoh, Menes, ruled in the year 3400 B.C.  
However, the Whites had launched the great civilization at a much 
earlier date.  In the year 4300 B.C. the people of the delta had 
invented the first calendar year with 365 days.  Menes conquered 
the Nubians and build a great dam to divert the waters of the Nile. 

       Thus they were able to drain the swamps and build a vast 
farming community in the fertile land.  Under Menses 
hieroglyphic writing (the first alphabetic signs) were developed.  It 
would be 2500 years later before any other people thought up an 
alphabet. 

       Thus we have an interval of 27 centuries in which an efficient 
society thrived.  The decline covered a long period of time.  The 
decay begins when the "fit race" is replaced by the "unfit race."  
Many attempts were made by the Pharaohs to stop the 
interbreeding of the races.  Mongrelization ended a great 
civilization.  It was never really conquered from without - it had 
decayed from within.


White Mummies 

        Egyptian Mummies have been exhumed which are complete 
with hair eyes, skin which are strictly from the White race.  The 
great engineering skills which resulted in the construction of the 
huge pyramids declined as inter-breeding between the races 
spread.  By breeding downward their culture gradually 
disappeared.  It was a slow retrogression of both mind and body.


The Second Dynasty 

       Under the Pharaoh Namar the first huge stone temples were 
erected using 120,000 Nubians as slave laborers.  The following 
six dynasties (years 2,929 B.C. to 2,475 B.C.) saw the 
development of a formal religion, an orderly government, society, 
industry and art.  All would be superior to that which would 
follow them. 

       Within the home the wife was in every respect equal with the 
husband.  Faithful affection and obedience to parents was 
important to youths.  A favorite early tomb inscription was: I was 
beloved by my father and praised by my mother."  Even at this 
early date the White Egyptians believed in a religion which was 
much like the Christianity which was yet to come - more than 
2000 years later.  

       The Egyptians devoutly believed in the immortality of the 
soul, the resurrection of the body after death.  Of their God Osiris 
it was said: "As Osiris lives so shall ye live; as Osiris died not, so 
shall ye also not die, as Osiris perished not, so shall ye also not 
perish." 
       (Note:  Does this not sound familiar?) 
       Thus the Egyptians elaborately embalmed their dead leaders 
as mummies to prepare for the day when they would be 
resurrected from the dead.  They believed that a ferryman would 
row the departed to the land of the glorified.  However the 
ferryman would carry only the good people of whom it was said: 
"There is no evil which he has done." 

       This was the first recorded record of the making of the life 
hereafter dependent on the moral quality of the life lived in this 
world.  As mongrelization set in with the Negroes of central 
Africa this religion was discarded and replaced by the worship of 
animals which still exists in chaotic Egypt today.


Building The Pyramids 

      The Egyptians were the first to discover the use of metals as 
tools.  Thus the drill was developed  which would cut slabs of 
stone blocks twenty to thirty feet long weighing fifty to sixty tons.  
They had drills of copper, long copper saws, which brought forth 
mighty weapons.  Pyramids were build that would be very 
difficult to erect today.

       Sesostris III, the Pharaoh of the 12th Dynasty came to power 
in 1,887 B.C.  He completed the conquest of Nubia.  This 
extension southward was very slow and to this they owed their 
long-lived civilization. 

        The Great Pyramid was built of two million three hundred 
thousand stone blocks each weighing two and a half tons.  They 
were floated on rafts from quarries south of Cairo and raised on 
enormous ramps.  This single project took ten years to complete.  
The Great Pyramid is 481 feet high.  The blocks are so close that 
the edges are fitted one ten-thousandth of an inch together which 
is equal to optical work today.  


Decline and Fall

       The sixth Dynasty began the use of Negro troops recruited in 
Nubia against their enemies.  This had much to do with the final 
decay and collapse of Egypt.  By the year 1,500 B.C. Half of the 
people of Southern Egypt were of mixed blood.  Some 800 years 
later, all progress ended when Teharka became the first mulatto 
Pharaoh in 688 B.C. 

       Negroes came to Egypt as soldiers, slaves and captives from 
other nations.  They lived in squalid settlements along the Nile 
outside the White communities.  Certain Pharaohs sought to 
prevent the mongrelization of the Egyptian race and made it a 
death penalty to bring them north.  One fort was erected on the 
Nile in central Egypt to stop the passage of Negroes to the north. 

       However, important people were always able to circumvent 
the law and their slaves were permitted to pass.  The Negro was a 
docile, subservient workman and soldier whom the less 
enlightened Pharaohs accepted.  Today, after 30 centuries of a 
mongrel Egypt, no progress whatsoever has occurred. 

       The White Egyptian race is now extinct.  The later mulatto 
Pharaohs also wanted to be buried in pyramids but could not 
build them.  Thus they removed the name of an early Pharaoh and 
inserted their own and were buried under the old pyramid.  Art, 
science and literature died out. 

       The Assyrians easily conquered Egypt and Teharka fled into 
Nubia from which he would never return.  His sister was the 
divine queen of the grossly debased animal worshipping religion.  
All subjects had to bow down before his Nubian mother.  His 
feeble line died out and Nubia relapsed back into its previous 
barbaric condition.  All future Pharaohs would be appointed by 
foreign occupying powers.


India -Land Of Aryans 

       The ancient Aryans came from Persia and entered India by 
way of Afghanistan (where their White descendants can still be 
found.)  To the south they conquered and enslaved a dark 
aboriginal race.  These people can be traced to the Asiatic branch 
of the Negro race.  Historian Madison Grant found that the 
Aryanized Whites of India spoke a language directly traceable to 
the old Sanskrit of the Mediterranean White people. 

       The great Aryan civilization of India existed from 2,000 B.C. 
to 1,400 B.C.  Their writings reveal a vigorous White society, a 
conquering people, well organized, respecting their women and 
already in possession of ancient laws.  They glorified in 
agriculture, were passionately religious, and imposed their faith 
and culture on the surrounding colored population whom they 
referred to with contempt.  They called themselves "a people of 
fair complexion."  They ridiculed the half-breeds they had so 
easily conquered.  They held them to be inferior and referred to 
them as "monkeys." 

       (Note:  When the Whites first ventured into Central Africa 
they wrote that the Negroes looked much like the gorillas who 
inhabited the same lands.)


The High Nose Race 

      Besides complexion a high bridged nose elevated a person 
over dark people who have a round-wide nose.  Even today the 
"nasal index" influences the status of Indians in the caste system.  
It should be noted that the British conquered India without hardly 
firing a shot.  The ancient Aryans found it even easier! 

       The Aryans set up a caste system to prevent racial 
intermarriage.  Explicit laws were adopted outlawing intermarriage 
and they established the Hindu religion which promoted the ideal 
of maintaining racial purity.  The caste system of segregation 
helped to prolong the Aryan civilization but eventually 
mongrelization set in. 

     The big question was - how to preserve the White race and still 
utilize the inferior colored peoples?  They decided that the answer 
was: "Caste, enforced by law and religion"  Originally caste 
divided the people into five divisions - warriors, priests, farmers, 
merchants and laborers. 

       The first was made up of the purest of the Aryans and the last 
of the subjected mix-breeds.  People were required to marry 
within their own caste.  The very black lower race was not even 
allowed to enter the system and were called 'outcasts."  This is 
how the term "outcast" originated.

      White people are the custodians of civilization.


Illegitimate Unions 

      Caste prevented mixed marriages but was incapable of 
preventing illegitimate sexual unions.  The Aryans were intent on 
retaining the purity of their White race.  Yet they were unable to 
discover those engaging in secret relations with the "low caste 
coloreds."  Thus they turned their wrath on the helpless half-caste.  
They were not allowed to live within the confines of the city.  
They were reviled by all, both White, colored and black castes. 
  
       Under certain conditions soldiers were permitted to slay them 
without mercy.  With time the mixed-breeds multiplied and the 
caste system broke down.  Today less than 10% of the Indian 
people can be classified as "White."  Nevertheless they still make 
up the ruling class.

(Note: Look at pictures of the Nehru family with their White 
features!) 

      These fair-skinned, high nosed warriors and priests, suddenly 
emerged from obscurity and conquered South India and Ceylon 
(now Sir Lanka.)  Then they moved along the coast and seized 
Cambodia.

       In India the colored Dravidians practiced a cult of barbaric 
superstitions.  Their religion was debauched and they worshipped 
cows and even rats (as some still do today.)  They recognized 
only the mother as the head of the family as this was the only way 
to establish parenthood.  Chile marriage was permitted along with 
the ghastly practice of throwing the widow on the funeral fire of 
the deceased male to send her off with him.  

      Culture decays when submerged by the non-creative race.  It 
is interesting that many of these primitive practices are also 
common in Darkest Africa.  


A God Fearing People

       The Aryans of India 2,000 years before the birth of Christ 
held high ideals.  They believed that immortality would be 
obtained through good works.  They believed that God would be 
incarnated and walk as man upon earth.  They also believed that 
God the Redeemer would return to this earth again.   

      One early Hindu prayer asked: "God who comprehends all 
things - take me to the immortal and imperishable abode where 
lithe dwells eternal." 

       They prayed and fasted for this one God, who through a 
miraculous birth would be reincarnated upon this earth.  They 
prayed for his reappearance.   

       It is interesting to note that Christianity has long been 
"natural" to the White Race.  It is the only branch of humankind 
to accept Christ.  The colored races which embrace Jesus Christ 
do so only with the influence of White Christians of missionaries.  
When our kind leave the scene the non-Whites quickly return to 
their superstitious voodoo type worship.  Even black Christian 
churches have adopted portions of the primitive African style of 
worship into their "churches" today. 

      One element saw in the interracial breeding of Aryan stock 
was quietly taking place with the mongrels of India.  They urged 
their leaders to expel the coloreds from their midst.  Such an 
action was overruled as being too "harsh" by the property owners 
who benefited from serf labor.  Sympathy for the oppressed is 
one of the chief means by which the racemixers seek to weaken 
the side of the Whites to accept coloreds as equals. 

       The Hindu religion sought to perpetuate the Whites by 
keeping the races apart in India.  It taught that caste was the will of 
God.  However, Gautama Buddha, an aristocrat of mixed blood, 
with Asiatic features predominating, sought a religion which 
would level the races of India.  Since the mongrels were in the vast 
majority, Buddhism became very popular.  It taught that all races 
were equal and interracial marriage would create a one race utopia. 

      However, today India is a hodge-podge of mixed breed 
peoples but the caste system is still intact. Hindus who are light-
skinned rule India!


Whites in Asia 

       Prof. Keane wrote "The dominant position in Society seems 
destined into the future to be held by the large and much 
convoluted brain of the White Caucasian people."  A branch of 
the White race followed a Northern route into Northern China, 
Mongolia, Korea and to Japan.  It is admitted that some people 
living here today are partly Caucasian.  Early Chinese civilization 
has been linked to that existing in Babylonia in prior centuries.  

      The people of southern China and Entocone are a much 
darker race and are inferior to the "Whiter" Asiatics of the north.  
The Japanese are hybrid Caucasians.  Even to this day the White 
"Ainus" people live in the mountains of northern Japan are 
definitely descendants of White Aryans.  They are also found on 
the northern Japanese island of Yezo. 

       The Chinese have the ability to hold on to science but not to 
advance it (which the Japanese - a more Whiter race are efficient 
at.)  The Chinese suffer from arrest of mental development by the 
closure of the sutures of the skull at an earlier age than do the 
Europeans or Japanese.

     _The Races of Man_ by Deniker, page 363, states: "Southern 
Siberia and North Mongolia are covered with stone circles, 
barrows, burial places, skulls, iron and copper, which are of 
European origin."   Early Chinese records refer to blonde tribes 
and there remain fair-skinned blue-eyed people in Manchuria and 
Korea today.  The rulers of China for the most part have been of 
hybrid-Caucasian descent.  The Chinese civilization was more 
creative 2,500 years ago than it is today - especially in the 
southern provinces.  

      Madison Grant,  In his masterful book,  "The Passing of The 
Great Race"  wrote: " The Chinese seem in some respects to be 
almost as incapable of progress as the Negroes themselves.  The 
only essential difference being that the arrest of mental 
development comes later in life for the yellow man than for the 
black.

       "Meanwhile it may be pointed out that Chinese culture has 
been stagnant since the early historic period despite many 
attempts to shake off the chronic state of lethargy in which China 
seems to vegetate."

       Even today Chinese medical art continues to be a hopeless 
mix of superstitions and absurd ideas.  Acupuncture still is 
considered a "cure all."

       Whites In South America Prominent Ethnologists are 
confident that the White man is responsible for the cultures of 
Mexico and Peru.  The American Indian came from Mongolia in 
Asia.  They ventured here from Siberia to Alaska and down into 
Central and South America.  Did the Caucasian follow the 
Mongolian on the same route to America?  We also know that the 
Vikings came from Greenland and Iceland to settle in eastern 
Canada and the New England states.

     (Note:  Thor Heyerdahl has proven that Egyptians in reed 
boats crossed the Atlantic and settled in Mexico.  His explorations 
show that the Pyramids of Mexico and Peru are similar to those in 
Egypt.  He also proved that Whites from Peru voyaged 2,000 
miles to Easter island where they erected hundreds of huge stone 
statues of White faced images.  Thus White people probably 
came here on northern Siberian route as well as across the sea from 
Egypt. 
      Cox did not have the benefit of this new information when he 
wrote this book in l937)

       The Caucasian race built an early civilization in the Americas.  
By the time the Spaniards arrived their society was already 
crumbling.  The White aristocratic leadership exhibited very 
different racial features than do the Mongolian Indian population 
which make up the vast majority of people living in Mexico today. 

      They built mighty pyramids like those in Egypt and originally 
had a religion similar to that of the Whites in India.  These 
pyramid builders did not have the slant eyes of the Indian nor the 
short round nose.  These Caucasian people originated a very high 
culture.  There is definitely a non-Mongolian element in the 
American Indian.  There is no doubt that this "lost race" 
amalgamated with the Indian people.  Many Indian words such as 
"Manhattan" are traced to European roots.  
 

The Racial Brain 

       The power of race extends to both body and mind and is not 
skin deep.  Race not only conditions us to what we are but to what 
we are to become.  The differentiations in the sub-species of 
humanity were determined in all their essentials untold ages ago.  
The Caucasian is the only race which has produced great stone 
architecture. 

       The stone temples of Mexico and Peru show an astonishing 
resemblance to those of Egypt. Can there be any difference of 
opinion as to their racial source?  Authorities have identified the 
language used in certain localities in Mexico with the spoken 
tongue of the ancient Caucasians in Asia. 

       There is a similarity between the games played in Mexico and 
those known to have been familiar to eastern Asia.  (See 1934 
edition of Encyclopedia Britannica on Archaeology - "The same 
designs, patterns and even games are found in ancient Mexico and 
in India and China.")  Alexander von Humcal has declared that the 
Mexican sun-dial calendar is identical with the Tibeto-Chinese 
calendar - which emanated from the European method of 
reckoning time.


The American Indians 

       The mysterious American "Indian" mounds were not built by 
the present day Mongolian Indians.  The White pioneers asked 
the Indians about the pyramid type mounds.  They did not know 
how they were constructed or for what purpose.  We now know 
that a Caucasian-hybrid people from Mexico journeyed up the 
Mississippi and spread east building the pyramid mounds as 
grave sites (like in Egypt-) and as defense fortifications for their 
rulers. 

      The people of Mexico and Peru held a religious belief in a 
universal flood.  The Aryan idea that God would become carinate 
and walk as a man to set an example for people to follow.  Bear in 
mind that the Christian faith rose within the White race and was 
disseminated across the world by the Caucasian people. 

      While there are Christians who are not White there are no 
colored Christians who have not taken this religion directly or 
indirectly from the White race! 

      Similar thoughts will arise from a common cerebral brain 
structure even though such related Caucasian people exist 
thousands of years apart or thousands of miles apart!


Races Think Alike 

      When interbreeding dilutes the purity of a race. it also 
destroys this common cerebral structure of the brain thus 
eliminating these important features of White thinking.  The mind 
is dependent upon the quantity and quality of the brain.  The 
Negro brain is vastly different and more archaic than the White 
brain.

     Millions of coloreds are flooding our nation  They are at war 
against our White civilization at all times.  As this deluge floods 
into our cities, so they will crumble.  

(Note: Do we not see this frightening prophecy coming to pass 
today?)

     Their increasing numbers constitute an ever growing menace to 
the progress of our White society.  Ultimately they threatened the 
very existence of our people.  The "color problem is a permanent 
problem."  Our very future is clouded and the problem will 
become even greater as the non-White population increases.

(Note:  Has not the charge of "racism" against White people 
grown with the increasing numbers and belligerence of the non-
Whites?)


Race-Mixing Problem In South America 

       Far more slaves were brought to South America than to the 
U.S.  The Negro and Indian freely co-mingled with many of the 
original Spanish and Portuguese. Thus there was interbreeding on 
a massive scale.  This is why a continent, far richer in natural 
resources, lags far behind the U.S. in progress. 

       Garcia Calderon, a Peruvian diplomat, in his work, Latin 
America, wrote: 

       "The Negro is a formal influence in Latin America.  They are 
revenged for their enslavement in that their blood is mingles with 
that of their masters.  The black race is doing its work and the 
continent is returning to a primitive barbarism.  Their 
retrogression constitutes a very serious menace.  The African 
woman satisfied the ardor of the conquerors - she has darkened 
the skin of his face.  South American civilization is dependent 
upon the numerical predominance of the Spaniard over the 
Mulatto, the Negro and the Indian.


Protect Blood Line

       The White people are a majority in Argentina, Chile, 
Uruguay, and southern Brazil.  Senior Pezet, Peru's foreign 
Minister stated in a lecture at Clark University: 

       "You people formed an unmixed mass.  Your ancestors came 
determined to settle down and so they brought their families with 
them.  Our men did not bring their women and families until 
many years after the conquest.  In consequence many Spaniards 
took unto themselves Indian women and the offspring became 
'Mestizos,' a mixed race that the haughty Castellan Spanish would 
never countenance.  However the Spanish monarchy, on the 
contrary encouraged interbreeding as the best possible means of 
establishing a uniform race." 

      Spain and Portugal believed that a mongrel nation would be 
more easily controlled.  This view was also promoted by Portugal, 
France and England in their African colonies.  
 
      The Belgium government in 1911 sought to promote unions 
between Whites and Negroes in the Belgium Congo.  Northern 
Brazil, where the Negro is in the majority, has witnessed the 
collapse of both culture and law and order.  The richest country in 
the Americas is facing total destruction at the hands of the blacks 
and mulattos.


Integrate South Africa

      In 1830 the British government launched a program to 
encourage interracial breeding in South  Africa.  All policies of 
segregation were banned.  However, in this vast land it was 
possible for the Whites to escape the enforced race-mixing 
program by fleeing to the north.  Missionaries from the British 
Anglican Church (The Church of England officially headed by the 
Queen) preached a radical pro-Negro policy openly advocating 
interracial marriage.  Some 98% of the slave owners remained in 
the Cape Colony. 

       The Voortrekkers (the Dutch Whites), the non-slave owners, 
knew that interbreeding with Negroes would doom their culture.  
They were a breed of austere, hard working, hard fighting praying 
Anglo-Saxons.  They defied the official British policy of reducing 
them to the level of the black African.  Their number included 
Dutch, Germans, English, Scotch and Irish.

       They first made their way to Natal.  No sooner had they 
'settled down" when the British landed from the sea and attacked 
them.  From here they proceeded to the transvall and Orange Free 
State.

       However the Zulus were at the peak of their power and knew 
no mercy.  Cut off from supplies from the sea, many Whites died 
>from  famine and pestilence.  Still they refused the demands of the 
British to return to the coast where they would have been 
submerged with the Anglican's church's madness of merging the 
two races into one.  

       As an example to others many missionaries and sub-normal 
Whites in the Cape Colony married black women and founded 
co-racial schools.  They urged the White and Negro children to 
socialize with one another.  They brazenly paraded the children 
through the streets with signs reading:  "We Are Of One Blood."  
The colony fell under the influence of these misguided zealots 
who believed that only they had the right to interpret the Holy 
Bible.


Whites Betrayed

       Negro tribes were now pouring into South Africa to take 
advantage of the British order that no retaliation be taken against 
blacks who raped, looted and murdered Whites.  Colonial 
Secretary Lord Glenelg actually ordered that the rampaging blacks 
be considered innocent because if they were treated with tolerance 
they would then behave properly.  

      Soon the Cape Colony would be destroyed through the decay 
of thousands of mulatto (colored) people unable to sustain 
civilization.  Today Cape Town is the most corrupt, decadent and 
collapsed area of South Africa with over 500,000 mulattoes. 

      The Whites of the Transvall and Free State now had the 
British to their backs and the fierce Zulu warriors to the north.  
Often the Zulus would pretend friendship or ask for truce talks.  
Then they would brutally slaughter the emissaries.  They would 
surround White Farming communities and attack with spears and 
hatchets.  Women and children would be brutally raped and then 
tortured to death. 


Fight Two Front Racial War

       Hissing like a snake the Zulus would dance and then begin 
their charge.  The Voortrekkers would fire and reload again and 
fire with true aim.  Thus they were triumphant despite being 
outnumbered 100 to 1.  The British Colonial Office never forgave 
the Whites for defying their orders to integrate with the Negroes. 

        For 25 years they would persecute these people, withholding 
food and weapons so that they would become weakened.  Then 
the savages might have another opportunity to defeat the Whites.  
Three times the British invaded the small White colonies and 
finally captured the Free State.  After subduing the Whites and 
disarming them the British withdrew.  They left them to the mercy 
of the Basuto tribe with whom the British had concluded a peace 
treaty. 

        Against all odds, in brutal hand-to-hand fighting in a two 
year war, the Whites finally defeated the Basuto.  The British, at 
the request of the Negroes, "took them under the folds of the 
British flag" and warned the Whites (Boers) to desist as the 
Basuto were now British subjects.  The British told the world that 
they were protecting the poor downtrodden blacks from the 
cruelty of the Whites. 

(Note:  Is this not the anti-White propaganda line we constantly 
hear today?)

     The British bullied the Boers into submission, then abandoned 
them to the fierce black tribes, attacked them again when they 
dared to defend themselves from terrible and murderous assaults 
by the Negroes.  The British occupied the Boer lands again and 
deprived them of their liberty for resisting the blacks.  This was to 
prove to the world that Britain would enforce racial equality and 
the interbreeding of the races.

Gold and Greed -- War Against Whites

     The discovery of gold and diamonds in the Free State and 
Transvaal led to the Boer War of 1898 to 1902 in which 
thousands of Whites were slaughtered.  All this because Cecil 
Rhodes demanded that this immense wealth be held for the 
Rothschild family of England to which the monarchy was deeply 
in debt.  (To this day the Rothschilds and Oppenheimers maintain 
a world-wide monopoly on all gold and diamond reserves.)

      Known laws of biology demonstrate that mongrelization does 
not blend traits and capacities of the races together.  The germ 
plasm of the primitive race will dominate and reduce the creativity 
of the advanced race.

      Suddenly the British government realized what tremendous 
damage race-mixing had inflicted on this rich nation of South 
Africa.  They saw the crumbling and decayed culture of the Cape 
Colony which was now called, "the land of the tar brush" and "the 
coffee-colored capitol."  Thus the British Parliament passed the 
_Act of Union_ which limited the seats in the South African 
parliament to "British Subjects of European descent."  Thus, after 
decades of fighting and senseless bloodshed, the British had 
recognized that the Boers had been right all along.

      (Note:  Today the White people of South Africa are back 
where they began.  Both the British, U.S. and the colored 
dominated United Nations are once again demanding black rule 
over the Whites.  This will never work and bloodshed will return 
on a massive scale.  The White people of the rest of the world 
must depend the rights of the Boer South Africans to have their 
own All-White society within the nation.)


The Negro In America

      The Negro has not proven himself to be the equal of the 
White Worker.  This is the reason big business has always 
favored hiring Whites over blacks.  The cotton gin and other 
inventions eliminated tens-of-thousands of jobs for blacks.  The 
Negro is indolent, slow and careless about his work.  The 
tendency to allow harder working mongrels to immigrate to 
America will eventually cost White people decent paying jobs. 

       The slave trade was immensely profitable.  Queen Elizabeth 
of England was keenly interested in taking the slave trade away 
>from  the Spanish.  She knighted John Hawkins and furnished 
him with a fleet of ships to haul slaves to America.  The first ship 
was named, "The Jesus."  


Slavery In America
 
       At that time the White world believed that they were doing the 
Negro a favor by saving him from brutal tribal chiefs who had 
already enslaved these people and would have either eaten them, 
worked them to death or tortured them for pleasure.  It was not 
uncommon for Puritan ministers to go out in small boats to meet 
the slave ships.  They gave prayers of thanksgiving to the 
Almighty for bring the heathen blacks to America where they 
could be saved through Christianity. 

       Before the American Revolution, some farsighted men 
petitioned the Queen to stop the slave trade because they saw that 
in the future it would lead to interbreeding and doom civilization 
here.  She refused as the profits of slavery were too great. 

      With modern industry replacing the need for stoop labor, the 
Negro has become a burden.  Some believe that the black race will 
die out due to their early and high death rate but this is not true.  
The real danger lies in the White man becoming extinct.  
Civilization has never survived an intimate and prolonged contact 
with the colored races.  The American civilization has survived as 
long as it has because important measures have been taken to 
preserve the purity of the White race.  These steps are:

Protection for Whites

   1)  In most states it is against the law for a White to marry a 
non-White. 
   2)  We have laws providing for the Segregation of the races in 
schools and public accommodations. 
   3)  The blacks have effectively been denied the right to vote in 
the Southern states through the Democratic White Primary and 
the poll tax and literacy test. 
   4)  Most of the major churches in the nation teach that race-
mixing and interracial marriage are forbidden by the Holy Bible.

       White Americans are fortunate to have all these barriers 
erected to maintain the preservation of the White race.

      (Note:  Dear readers - take note that all of the above was 
written by Cox in 1937.  All of these protective barriers have been 
destroyed leaving our children defenseless to the constant barrage 
of propaganda advocating every conceivable form of interracial 
mixing.  Such dastardly policies are now advocated by most 
churches, schools, politicians and the media.  Thus we see the 
work we have cut out for ourselves to save our White Race and 
White America.)

      It is our duty to bequeath to our posterity the race type and 
culture received by us from our forefathers.  We have survived in 
America for over three centuries but will we survive in the three 
centuries ahead of us?  The struggle for the maintenance of 
civilization is the struggle for the preservation of the White race.  
We owe the fact that we are White entirely to those who lived 
before us.  Had they feebler morals, we would be mix-breeds 
living in squalor today.


Stop Black Voting

      Even after the civil war a majority of Americans were opposed 
to granting "suffrage" (the right to vote) to the Negro.  It was 
voted down in every state except Iowa and Minnesota where no 
blacks lived.  In 1868 Michigan voted it down by a 32,000 vote 
majority.  New York voted against allowing Negroes the right to 
vote by 34,000 votes. 

       The problem lies not in a White marrying a full-blood Negro.  
It is the octoroon (one-eight) light skinned Negro who will marry 
the White girl.  Their offspring will consider marrying a quadroon 
(one-fourth) darker Negro and so the downward spiral spins out 
of control.  It is of interest that those "blacks" who are hailed as 
being very intelligent are always mulattoes.  Had they been White 
their "brilliance" might well make them appear merely "average."


Race and Heredity

       Maintaining the purity of the White race must be a national 
ideal.  Racial heredity governs , spiritual, physical, skin color, hair 
texture, skull shape, brain capacity, skeletal propositions and 
psychic predispositions.  Allowing such an inferior race increase 
within our borders will drastically lower our standards.  If the 
Negro could be removed from the Southern States our future 
would be much brighter than it is now.


Slavery Benefited Negroes

       President Grover Cleveland said:  The Negro is the greatest 
problem of our civilization and constitutes the only problem 
beyond which we cannot see." 

      Slavery in America left the Negro infinitely better off that he 
was in Africa.  

      White people rescued them from cannibalism, clothed the 
naked savage and provided him with medical care and job training 
in a far more healthier environment.  The institution of slavery 
resulted in greater harm to the White race than to the black. 

      The Negro has profited from contact with the White while the 
White has suffered great losses from his contact with the Negro.  
The White people have held a superior position to the Negro 
down through history and has been the predominant force in 
directing the civilized history of the world.  No one can deny that 
the Negro has been the beneficiary of the White man's progress.


Separate Nation For Blacks

      Thomas Jefferson said: "Nothing is more certainly written in 
the book of fate than that these people are to be free / nor is it less 
certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same 
government." 

      The part of this statement after the slash (/) was deliberately 
left off the Jefferson Monument in Washington.   

      During the Lincoln-Douglas debate held in Charleston, ILL. 
on Sept. 18, 1858 Douglas said: 
     "I am opposed to Negro citizenship in any and every form.  I 
believe that this government was made by White men for the 
benefit of White men and their posterity forever."


Lincoln Speaks

      Lincoln's famous response was: "I will say then, that I am not, 
nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the 
social and political equality of the White and the black races - that 
I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of 
the Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to 
intermarry with White people, and I will say in addition to this, 
that there is a physical difference between the White and black 
races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living 
together on terms of social and political equality."


Liberia - The Black Homeland

       Jefferson, Lincoln, Madison, Monroe, Jackson, Clay, 
Webster, Douglas, Grant and many others supported the 
American Colonization Society.  They established the nation of 
Liberia in Africa for the resettlement of all blacks back to their 
own homeland.  During the Civil War Lincoln made inquiries 
with South American nations to determine if our blacks could be 
sent there.  Later President Grant presented a bill in the Congress 
to provide for all blacks to be resettled in Haiti and Santo 
Domingo.  Unfortunately it failed to pass.


Separate The Races 

      The physical separation of the races is the only total alternative 
to the eventual amalgamation of the races.  Timid individuals will 
tell you that repatriation of the American Negro is an 
impossibility.  Ask them for their solution to the problem.  They 
have none! 

       There are but two solutions - separation or amalgamation!

       Those who do not advocate the first are to be classed as 
adherents of the latter! 

       Will you work with those who seek a White America or will 
you grant the misguided liberals the power to turn our country 
into a mulatto populated decadent nation? 

       Will it be a White America or a Negroid America?  One or 
the other will be our fate - there is no middle ground!  God helps 
those who help themselves.  Look into the future and visualize the 
burden our children and our children's children will face unless 
we act now.  Men die; man lives on!  Now is the time for all 
White people to UNITE for action to save the White race for a 
white America.

(Note:  There is still a small black  "Back To Africa" organization 
in America.  They should be encouraged to continue working in 
the name of the great Marcus Garvey.  Also consideration should 
be given to providing the Negro race with a separate nation within 
our borders made up of one or more states.  Black independence 
must be studied, debated, and acted upon for the permanent 
salvation of both races.)


Fastest Collapsing Cities

     Many people think of New York City as the most rapidly 
declining area in the nation.  The East-West Council has reported 
that the worst major city in America is ST. LOUIS, followed by 
PITTSBURG and CLEVELAND.

      St Louis has lost 95,000 people in the past 10 years.  They 
were mostly in their productive years of 18 to 65.  All three cities 
had a large loss of young educated professionals.  There can be 
no doubt that the criminal violence on the part of Negroes is the 
root cause of the decline.


The Anti-White Church 

       The Anglican Church of England is once again intruding in 
South African affairs.  On Jan. 17 the Archbishop of Canterbury, 
George Carey, arrived in the mongrelized decadent town of Cape 
Town (where over 500,000 mulattoes live.)  Carey urged a rapid 
and peaceful transition to a black ruled government.  END


Communist Work to Instill a "Guilt-Complex" 
Within Whites to Further Mongrelization

       The following statement quotes the well known Communist 
writer, Israel Cohen, who in 1921 wrote "A racial Program For 
The Twentieth Century."  This quote can be found in the U.S. 
Congressional Record of 1957, on page 8559, available from the 
U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

      "We must realize that our Party's most powerful weapon is 
racial tension.  By pounding into the consciousness of the dark 
races that for centuries they have been oppressed by the Whites, 
we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party.  The 
terms colonialism and imperialism must be featured in our 
propaganda in America, we will aim for a subtle victory.  While 
inflaming the Negro minority against the Whites.  We will 
endeavor to instill in the Whites a built complex for their 
exploitation of the Negroes. 
       "We will aid the Negroes to rise to prominence in every walk 
of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and 
entertainment.  With this prestige, the Negroes will be able to 
intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver 
America to our cause." 
***

------------------
Words of Wisdom
by Senator Theodore G. Bilbo, of Mississippi in 1947
 
     "If our buildings, our highways, and our railroads should be 
wrecked, we could rebuild them.  If our cities should be destroyed, 
out of the very ruins we could erect newer and greater ones.  Even 
if our armed might should be crushed, we could rear sons who would
redeem our power.  But if the blood of our White race should become 
corrupted and mingled with the blood of Africa, then the present 
greatness of the United states of America would be destroyed and all 
hope for civilization would be as impossible for a Negroid America as 
would be redemption and restoration of the White man's blood which had 
mixed with that of the Negro."
------------------

End of Article..
-----------------------

    "Vigilantes of Christendom" 
      by Richard Kelly Hoskins
(The story of Militant Christianity)

   It follows the spread of violent alien liberation tactics into
Christendom, gives the past history of Christendom's own 
Phineas Priesthood, and projects startling events that lie just 
ahead.

   Richard Kelly Hoskins is the author of the best seller, "War
Cycles/Peace Cycles" and other books, pamphlets and articles 
circulated worldwide.  His new book relates the history and 
rebirth of militant Christianity.  His research discloses that the 
rise of violent religious movements in other lands has triggered 
the same phenomenon  in the West.  No longer will political 
and economic considerations alone determine events in 
Christendom as people again begin to believe that their God's 
Laws must be enforced on earth and that God has created a 
priesthood to enforce them! 
     482 pages, hardback.

    As the Kamakazi is to the Japanese
    As the Shiite is to Islam
    As the Zionist is to the Jews
    So the Phineas Priest is to Christendom

Vigilantes of Christendom - tells the stories of role models - 
Phineas, Sampson, King Arthur, Beowulf, St. George, Capt. 
John Smith, and many others.

Vigilantes of Christendom - tells the story of Death Wind who, 
after being ambushed by savages, killed 2000 in retaliation

Vigilantes of Christendom - tells the story of the attack on 
homosexuals and the destruction of porno-parlors

Vigilantes of Christendom - traces the assassinations of Western 
Christian leaders and the beginning of retaliation

Vigilantes of Christendom - tells the story of the execution of 
Alen Berg - foul mouthed anti-Christian disc jockey.

Vigilantes of Christendom - tells the story of Blood River in 
South  Africa where the Zulus say angels came and fought for 
the settlers.

Published by:  Virginia Publishing Company
  Available from:  Scriptures for America,
                   P.O. Box 766-c,
                   LaPorte, Colorado 80535, USA
                   $20.00 postpaid


---------------------------------------
Get the "Identity.faq" and many other files by
anonymous FTP from:    ftp.netcom.com /pub/SF/SFA
-------------------------------------------------


-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|   For unique political commentary & Christian views        Rick Savage    | 
|     Anonymous FTP:  ftp.netcom.com  - pub/SF/SFA           PO Box 5251    |
|   To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file       Denver, CO 80217 |
|       In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help.                 (u)SA       |


From rs241@delphi.com Thu Jun 29 05:35:56 PDT 1995
Article: 22851 of alt.revisionism
Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!news.insinc.net!news.sprintlink.net!wizard.pn.com!satisfied.apocalypse.org!news2.near.net!news.delphi.com!usenet
From: rs241@delphi.com
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: NO NO DELIBERATE STARVATION POLICY FOR INMATES
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 95 18:49:25 -0500
Organization: Delphi (info@delphi.com email, 800-695-4005 voice)
Lines: 26
Message-ID: 
References: <454824811wnr@stumpy.demon.co.uk> <1995Jun22.001704.1780@hobbes.kzoo.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bos1b.delphi.com
X-To: Jamie R. McCarthy 

Jamie R. McCarthy  writes:
 
>In the second half, I pointed out that Hans Frank documented, in his
>diary, exactly when it was decided by top Nazi officials to starve the
>Jews and Poles.  In his diary entry for 24 August 1942, Frank took down
>the minutes of the meeting:  "That we sentence 1,200,000 Jews to die of
>hunger should be noted only marginally."  And there are other
>expressions of this statement (though none so explicit and in so few
>words) -- all of which I presented with full context.
>
 
 
 
 
This quote from Dr. Frank's diary is devastating not to the
Revisionists, but to the anti-Revisionists.  According to the
Exterminationists, Chelmno began operations on December 1941
(this camp was outside of the General Government).  The camps
of Belzec and Sobibor were in operation in early 1942.  The
Treblinka camp began working several weeks before this entry by
Dr. Frank was made.  If this entry by Dr. Frank is authentic,
then there were no gas chambers at these camps, nor were there
evacuations to the east.  What Dr. Frank should have said
(to please both sides of the debate): "We do not need to
feed 1.2 million Jews within our borders, since these people
are being evacuated to the east."


From rs241@delphi.com Thu Jun 29 05:36:03 PDT 1995
Article: 22858 of alt.revisionism
Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!unixg.ubc.ca!vanbc.wimsey.com!fountain.mindlink.net!agate!sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk!plug.news.pipex.net!pipex!oleane!simtel!news.kei.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!satisfied.apocalypse.org!news2.near.net!news.delphi.com!usenet
From: rs241@delphi.com
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Holocaust Almanac - I.G. Farben removed 'indicator' from gas
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 95 18:06:41 -0500
Organization: Delphi (info@delphi.com email, 800-695-4005 voice)
Lines: 55
Message-ID: 
References: <1995Jun16.160157.7300@hobbes.kzoo.edu> <3s4q6r$fjg@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bos1d.delphi.com
X-To: HMazal 

HMazal  writes:
 
>Both Mr. Hunt (a.k.a. DbtgThomas) and Mr. [anonymous] (a.k.a.
>rs241@delphi.com) have had the opportunity to search their libraries and
>prove, beyond reasonable proof, whether the producers of Zyklon-B did or
>did not include a warning agent in their deadly product. After perusing
>the evidence that follows, one hopes that they will concede that Zyklon-B
>was produced both _with_ and _without_ the agent.  We can then continue
>with Mr. rs241's inquisiton.
 
 
 
 
 
I am not concerned whether  this gas was produced with an odor
indicator (or irritant or warning agent), or without.  What interests
me is whether or not the production of this product without the
indicator showed criminal intent in regards to the alleged
extermination of Jews.  The quotation from Commandant Hvss's
memorandum does not state that the gas did not have an indicator,
but that it had "less" of an indicator.  There were forty copies of
this memorandum distributed throughout the camp.    The document
NI-9912 does state that: "this irritant also has the advantage of
stimulating the respiration of insects."  It is claimed by the manual
that it has an advantage; it does not mean that it would be
disadvantageous to use it on lice without the indicator.  Also, many
businesses's often emphasize the positive aspects of their products,
not the negative.  In other words, does an irritant warn rodents;
therefore giving these creatures a chance to escape from a multiroom
building should it not be sealed properly?
 
 
 
 
Regarding your quotation of Professor Hilberg, you had forgotten to
include the rest of Professor Hilberg's sentence.  This order by a
representative of Mrugowski was needed by the Waffen-SS.  I had pointed
out in an earlier post that this organization had expanded during the
course of the war (I had used combat units as an example, since I do
not have sufficient informations on the other branches such as the
training units, prison guards, etc.) and could have been shipped
anywhere.  Professor Hilberg did not state that all or part of this
requisition was intended for Auschwitz.  On the following sentence,
Hilberg claims that 2800 KG (if we really want to nitpick, he did not
state whether or not this was Zyklon, but I would think so)  was
ordered by Dr. Evers and shipped to Auschwitz.   Professor Hilberg did
not claim these two requests were linked.
 
 
 
Where does Professor Hilberg directly state that the request for
Zyklon B without the odor indicator was necessary for the
extermination of people?
 
 


From rs241@delphi.com Thu Jun 29 15:24:51 PDT 1995
Article: 22863 of alt.revisionism
Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!unixg.ubc.ca!vanbc.wimsey.com!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news2.near.net!news.delphi.com!usenet
From: rs241@delphi.com
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: NO NO DELIBERATE STARVATION POLICY FOR INMATES
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 95 18:55:30 -0500
Organization: Delphi (info@delphi.com email, 800-695-4005 voice)
Lines: 19
Message-ID: 
References: <454824811wnr@stumpy.demon.co.uk> <1995Jun22.001704.1780@hobbes.kzoo.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bos1f.delphi.com
X-To: Jamie R. McCarthy 

Jamie R. McCarthy  writes:
 
>* "If the Germans had wanted to kill the inmates, why choose a policy
>of starvation, why not set up another gas chamber?"  (Starvation,
>though it takes longer and is crueller, is just as effective.  And
>Mr. Roberts knows full well that the Belsen camp did not experience
>its dramatic overcrowding until the last few months of the war -- if
>they had wanted to gas the inmates, there was not much time to build
>the gas chamber.)
 
 
 
If Commandant Kramer had intent to commit murder via starvation,
why didn't he cremate the corpses?   He was commandant of Birkenau
during his career.   It has been alleged that this camp was
murdering and cremating people (via furnaces and burning pits).
The logic used by non-Revisionist historians was to cover-up the crime.
Why the sudden change in policy?  Couldn't he obtain fuel
>from  the panzer school?


From mstein@access5.digex.net Thu Jun 29 15:25:02 PDT 1995
Article: 22874 of alt.revisionism
Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!unixg.ubc.ca!info.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news1.digex.net!news3.digex.net!digex.net!not-for-mail
From: mstein@access5.digex.net (Michael P. Stein)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: NO NO DELIBERATE STARVATION POLICY FOR INMATES
Date: 28 Jun 1995 00:09:32 -0400
Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA
Lines: 68
Message-ID: <3sqkls$gad@access5.digex.net>
References: <454824811wnr@stumpy.demon.co.uk> <1995Jun22.001704.1780@hobbes.kzoo.edu> 
NNTP-Posting-Host: access5.digex.net

In article ,   wrote:
>This quote from Dr. Frank's diary is devastating not to the
>Revisionists, but to the anti-Revisionists.  According to the
>Exterminationists, Chelmno began operations on December 1941
>(this camp was outside of the General Government).  The camps
>of Belzec and Sobibor were in operation in early 1942.  The
>Treblinka camp began working several weeks before this entry by
>Dr. Frank was made.  If this entry by Dr. Frank is authentic,
>then there were no gas chambers at these camps, nor were there
>evacuations to the east.

    Not necessarily; Frank may at that time have been unaware of a) the
camps, or (more likely) b) their capacity and/or full scope of operations. 
See below.... 


>What Dr. Frank should have said (to please both sides of the debate): 
>"We do not need to feed 1.2 million Jews within our borders, since these 
>people are being evacuated to the east."

   And you know what?  Frank did change his tune!  On 9th December Frank 
no longer talked about losing Jews to starvation; more active measures 
were referred to though not spelled out in detail.



     I expect great things from your elasticity, and please don't come 
     to me with complaints about contradictions in our economic policy.  
     For you there is only one order, bring in workers from wherever you 
     can find them.

     Recently they have taken away a non-insignificant portion of our 
     old, protected Jewish workers.  It is clear that the process of 
     finding workers is made more difficult when, in the middle of this 
     war-related jobs program, an order comes that all Jews are to be 
     exterminated.  [In German "alle Juden sind der Vernichtung anheim 
     zu stellen", literally "All Jews are to be submitted to 
     extermination."]  The responsibility for this order does not rest 
     with the administration of the General Government.  This order for 
     extermination of the Jews comes from higher authorities.  We must 
     only reconcile ourselves to its conclusions, and can merely inform 
     the Federal authorities that the removal of those Jews capable of 
     working has led to tremendous difficulties.  Only recently I 
     complained to State Secretary Ganzenmueller [top official in the 
     Federal Transportation Ministry] that a huge building project in 
     the General Government had come to a standstill, and that I could 
     prove that this would not have happened had not the many thousands 
     of Jews who were employed on that project been hauled away.  Now an 
     order has been issued saying that all Jews should be taken off of 
     armaments work; I hope that this order will be repealed, if it has 
     not already been repealed, for otherwise I see the situation as 
     even worse.



Source: Minutes of a Cabinet Meeting, from the Office Diary of Hans 
Frank, 9 December 1942 (588-89), quoted in "Holocaust 1939-1945: A 
Collection of Primary Sources," selected and translated by John L. 
Heineman, pp. 142-143.

    (Please do note that Frank said "Vernichtung" rather than
"Ausrottung.")

    Posted/emailed.
-- 
Mike Stein			The above represents the Absolute Truth.
POB 10420			Therefore it cannot possibly be the official
Arlington, VA  22210		position of my employer.


From kfilan@netcom.com Thu Jun 29 19:52:50 PDT 1995
Article: 22880 of alt.revisionism
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!unixg.ubc.ca!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!psgrain!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!kfilan
From: kfilan@netcom.com (kevin filan)
Subject: Re: Holocaust Almanac - I.G. Farben removed 'indicator' from gas
Message-ID: 
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References: <1995Jun16.160157.7300@hobbes.kzoo.edu> <3s4q6r$fjg@newsbf02.news.aol.com> 
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 1995 12:44:36 GMT
Lines: 61
Sender: kfilan@netcom17.netcom.com

rs241@delphi.com wrote:
: I am not concerned whether  this gas was produced with an odor
: indicator (or irritant or warning agent), or without.

	It is good you feel that way, as there is pretty overwhelming 
evidence that the gas was produced BOTH with and without an irritant.  
Now we come to the question of why... the same question which arises for 
you later on in your post.

  						What interests
: me is whether or not the production of this product without the
: indicator showed criminal intent in regards to the alleged
: extermination of Jews.  The quotation from Commandant Hvss's
: memorandum does not state that the gas did not have an indicator,
: but that it had "less" of an indicator. 

	We've already said that Zyklon-B's active ingredient (Hydrogen 
Cyanide) has a distinctive "bitter almond" smell.  There is a 
CONSIDERABLE difference between this odor and the odor of the irritant, 
which I'm led to believe had an effect similar to tear gas.  

	Given the fact that Zyklon-B is highly dangerous, don't you 
suppose that we might consider that irritant pretty darned important? And 
that we might question why it was shipped?

 					There were forty copies of
: this memorandum distributed throughout the camp.    The document
: NI-9912 does state that: "this irritant also has the advantage of
: stimulating the respiration of insects."

	In other words... this irritant makes it _more_ effective as a 
delousing agent.  And yet the SS still wanted it removed, even though 
they were using it as a delousing agent.  Curious, no? 

					  It is claimed by the manual
: that it has an advantage; it does not mean that it would be
: disadvantageous to use it on lice without the indicator.

	Give me an "A!" Give me a "U!" Give me an "S!" ... 

	No, they didn't say it wouldn't WORK without the irritant... just 
that it worked better WITH it?

							  Also, many
: businesses's often emphasize the positive aspects of their products,
: not the negative.  In other words, does an irritant warn rodents;
: therefore giving these creatures a chance to escape from a multiroom
: building should it not be sealed properly?

	Possibly... but Zyklon-B was predominantly used in "delousing" 
chambers for delousing clothing.  Last I heard, lice aren't rodents.  So 
why remove something that would make it a more effective tool in getting 
rid of lice... its ostensible purpose?

Peace
Kevin Filan
-- 
________________________________________________________________
Kevin Filan			*	P.O. Box 231582
kfilan@netcom.com		*	Old Statehouse Station
Rakshasa PODSnet, FidoNet, IRC	*	Hartford, CT 06123
________________________________________________________________   
"Toto... I don't think we're in Kansas anymore..."


From dmittleman@bpavms.bpa.arizona.edu Sat Jul  1 05:27:03 PDT 1995
Article: 22959 of alt.revisionism
Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!info.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!noao!news.Arizona.EDU!bpavms.bpa.arizona.edu!dmittleman
From: dmittleman@bpavms.bpa.arizona.edu (Daniel Mittleman)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: NO NO DELIBERATE STARVATION POLICY FOR INMATES
Date: 28 Jun 1995 06:18 MST
Organization: University of Arizona (BPA)
Lines: 43
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <28JUN199506183993@bpavms.bpa.arizona.edu>
References: <454824811wnr@stumpy.demon.co.uk> <1995Jun22.001704.1780@hobbes.kzoo.edu> 
NNTP-Posting-Host: bpavms.bpa.arizona.edu
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.50    

    [posted and emailed, reply by post please]

>Jamie R. McCarthy  writes:
> 
>>In the second half, I pointed out that Hans Frank documented, in his
>>diary, exactly when it was decided by top Nazi officials to starve the
>>Jews and Poles.  In his diary entry for 24 August 1942, Frank took down
>>the minutes of the meeting:  "That we sentence 1,200,000 Jews to die of
>>hunger should be noted only marginally."  And there are other
>>expressions of this statement (though none so explicit and in so few
>>words) -- all of which I presented with full context.

>This quote from Dr. Frank's diary is devastating not to the
>Revisionists, but to the anti-Revisionists.  According to the
>Exterminationists, Chelmno began operations on December 1941
>(this camp was outside of the General Government).  The camps
>of Belzec and Sobibor were in operation in early 1942.  The
>Treblinka camp began working several weeks before this entry by
>Dr. Frank was made.  If this entry by Dr. Frank is authentic,
>then there were no gas chambers at these camps, nor were there
>evacuations to the east.  What Dr. Frank should have said
>(to please both sides of the debate): "We do not need to
>feed 1.2 million Jews within our borders, since these people
>are being evacuated to the east."

    {sigh} Some days I wonder if there is a screen a denier basic training
    to make sure that no one there has passed a course in logic.

    If the entry by Dr. Frank is authentic, then why would that entry
    invalidate either gas chambers or evacuations to the East?

    Isn't it possible that there were different policies at different
    times?  Isn't it possible that there were different policies at the
    same time for different sub-groups of the population?

    Isn't it possible that Dr. Frank (rather than summarizing all
    comprehensive policy with this diary note) was merely commenting to
    himself on a new policy established that day?

===========================================================================
daniel david mittleman     -     danny@arizona.edu     -     (520) 621-2932

       "I can't complain, but sometimes I still do..."  -- Joe Walsh

Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor