The Nizkor Project: Remembering the Holocaust (Shoah)

Shofar FTP Archive File: people/s/savage.rick/1994/rs.1094


Archive/File: fascism/identity rs.1094
Last-Modified: 1994/10/28

Article 18127 of alt.revisionism:
Xref: oneb alt.skinheads:9984 alt.revisionism:18127
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads,alt.revisionism
Path: oneb!hakatac!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!vanbc.wimsey.com!scipio.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!EU.net!uunet!olivea!sgigate.sgi.com!enews.sgi.com!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Racial Bill of Rights - BOOK REVIEW
Message-ID: 
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 1994 19:07:21 GMT
Lines: 72

-----------------------------------------
___The Racial Compact___
  by Richard McCulloch
 
A Racial Bill of Rights
     If individuals are protected by a Bill of Rights, why not races?  
All sorts of laws are on the books to prevent discrimination against 
minorities, but what about the Majority, which is under attack 24 
hours a day?  Doesn't America's largest population group deserve 
a break?  Richard McCulloch, who has written several books on 
racial matters, proposes _The Racial Compact_, the title of his 
latest work.  McCulloch wants to see a universal agreement, 
something on the order of the United Nations Charter, to protect 
and preserve all races, not just the ones currently in favor.  The 
author has gone to the trouble of making a comprehensive draft of 
his proposal.  In contrast to the UN's Genocide Convention, 
which is primarily based on hate, McCulloch's Racial Compact is 
founded on mutual respect.  To lend weight to his idea.  
McCulloch has come up with a Charter of Racial Rights, one of 
which asserts.  "All races have the right to have their existence and 
identity recognized, respected and protected..."
     What McCulloch is getting at is a legal way to stop or at least 
slow miscegenation which, he claims, weakens both the number 
and character of the two races from which the hybrids emerge.  In 
his considered opinion, multiculralism and multiracism lead not to 
diversity but to a dull, monotonous overall sameness.
     McCulloch's charter is a racial Magna Carta that will be 
anathema to anti-racists, whom he calls racial nihilists.  His 
poosition is that racial protectionism will do much more to bring 
peace to the world than racial integration.  We've all seen what 
integration has done to the social order.  To McCulloch a majority 
threat to any race is one race's interference and meddling into the 
affairs of another.  As he says in his book, "let Poland be Poland, 
Sweden be Sweden...China be Chine, India be India."  but this can 
only be accomplished if governments are dedicated to enforcing 
racial preservation.
     The idea of a racial charter subscribed to by all nations is just 
one of McCulloch's interesting insights.  Another is his tracing 
what he calls "racial nihilism"  to gnosticism, which he defines as 
"claiming that the only true reality is non-material or spiritual."  
Racial nihilistsls members of a Nordish race, both here and 
abroad, since their very existence has been threatened by non-
Nordish immigrants, a low birthrate and an anti-Nordish 
ideological crusade headed by one minority, whihc he is careful 
not to identify. derived from searching for some way to save 
Northern Europeans, whom he calls members of a Nordish race, 
both here and abroad, since their very existence has been 
threatened by non-Nordish immigrants, a low birthrate and an 
anti-Nordish ideological crusade headed by one minority, whihc 
he is careful not to identify.
     Everywhere the Nordish people are losing the simmering racial 
war.  New ideas are needed to help turn the war around and 
inspire a successful counterattack.  If put into practice, 
McCulloch's ideas could be much more effective than bullets.
     _The Racial Compact_ is well worth reading and rereading in 
preparation for the dark times ahead.  Our enemies will find its 
content difficult to refute.  Our potential friends will find it 
attractive and insightful.  It may be ordered from Towncourt 
Enterprises, P.O. Box 9151, Coral Springs, Florida 33075, USA.  
Softcover, 135 pages, $8.95 postpaid.
 
 
-----------------------------------------
Get the "Identity.faq" and many other files by
anonymous FTP from:    ftp.netcom.com /pub/SFA
-----------------------------------------

-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|     Access this ftp site for many interesting files:      Rick Savage     | 
|  Anonymous FTP server:  ftp.netcom.com  -  cd /pub/SFA    PO Box 5251     |
|       Gov't, history, law, Bible, socialissues          Denver, CO 80217  |


Article 18196 of alt.revisionism:
Xref: oneb alt.revisionism:18196 alt.religion.christian:3616 alt.christnet.theology:1419
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.religion.christian,alt.christnet.theology
Path: oneb!hakatac!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!scipio.cyberstore.ca!vanbc.wimsey.com!news.bc.net!news.mic.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!agate!darkstar.UCSC.EDU!news.hal.COM!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Identity.faq
Message-ID: 
Keywords: Identity,Israelites,Jews,Christian Identity
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 1994 04:32:09 GMT
Lines: 1487

IDENTITY -- F.A.Q. -- An Introduction
Frequently Asked Question (and Answers) 
on the "Israel-Identity" Christian Message.
 
Compiled by Rick Savage 
Last Updated 9/1/94
Future updates available via anonymous ftp 
     ftp to:        ftp.netcom.com
     Location:   /pub/SFA/identity.faq
 
    "And are not they [today's "Jews"] the inventors of the Chosen 
People myth?" -- [Dr. Oscar Levy, preface, "The World 
Significance of the Russian Revolution," George Pitt Rivers 
(Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell, 1920) vi]
    "Behold, days are coming, says YHWH (The LORD) when I will 
effect a New Covenant with the House of Israel and with the House 
of Judah..."  [Hebrews 8:8]
 
Table Of Contents - The Questions
----------------------------
1.  What is the Christian message of Israel's Identity in a nutshell?
     Why is it such a "minority" belief and so maligned by it's 
     detractors?
2.  What difference does the "Israel-Identity" Christian message 
     make?
3.  What is the central proof of the "Israel-Identity" Christian 
     message?  What about the so-called "Messianic Jews"?
4.  Isn't the "Jewish" god the God of the Old Testament?  Isn't this 
     why we refer to the popular (kosher) belief in Christ as 
     "Judeo-Christianity"?
5.  Who are these self-styled "Jews" if they are not Israelites?
6.  Is the "Israel Identity" Christian message "anti-semitic"?
7.  What is the difference between a Semite, a Hebrew, an Israelite 
     and a "Jew"?  Are these terms equivalent in any way and can they
     be used interchangeably?  
8.  Is the "Israel Identity" Christian message "racist" and 
     "white supremacist"?  What about 'non-white' races?  Inferior?  
     Superior?  Equal?  
9.  Can the redemption of the house of Israel through accepting the 
     Covenant offered by Christ, *only* be granted to descendants of 
     Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob?  Or is this same redemption available 
     to all?  And if the same redemption is available to all, to black and
     white, Khazar and non-Khazar, 'false' and 'true' Israelites, then 
     why does the 'identity' of the tribe of Israel matter?  How does the
     redemption of different races or kinds or types differ?
10. What about Adam and Eve?  Were they of the white 'race' or 
     did they are they the mother and father of all the "races"?  
11. How did the white 'race' manage to keep its bloodline pure 
     during times when instances of intermarriage are known to 
     have occurred?  How can we prove the purity of our own 
     bloodline?  How do we know that we aren't all mongrels?  
     What about those who are already mixed and know they are 
     not "100% pure Israelite?"
12. What are the consequences of the self-styled "Jews" NOT 
     being who they claim to be?
13. Conclusion -  LET THE BLIND SEE!
 *   Sources and other resources for further investigation
 *   When the Saxon Learns to Love!
=====================================
 
INTRODUCTION
 
     "Here is a paradox,  a most ingenious paradox: an 
anthropological fact, many Christians may have much more 
Hebrew-Israelite blood in their veins than most of their Jewish 
neighbors." -- Alfred M. Lilienthal, "What Price Israel" (Chicago: 
Henry Regnery Company, 1953) 223.
     The statement above, made by an anti-Zionist "Jew," reflects an 
idea we hope to prove further in this document of questions and 
answers.  Since information concerning the "Identity" message has 
been mostly from those who take the opposite presupposition to the 
question, we felt that it was necessary to defend the beliefs of a 
growing Christian reform movement.  This movement would 
question centuries of the "traditions of men" with what they believe 
to be a more correct understanding of Scriptural truth and history.
     There are some people who have already made up their mind on 
this matter.  They are those who want to answer every question 
before hearing out the other side of the story.  They would be wise to
heed the advise of the Apostle Paul when he said:  "if anyone 
supposes that he knows anything, he has not known as he ought to
know," (I Corinthians 8:2).  This brief attempt to answer the questions
above is for those who are not so fool-hearty to believe they can 
answer the matter before they hear it.
     We admonish you to be as noble as the Bereans who "received 
the word with all readiness of mind, and search the scriptures....to 
see if these things are so" (Acts 17:11).  May the Spirit of Truth 
help you to discern what stands upon the Rock of Truth and what is 
built on the sinking sands of tradition.
 
1.  What is the Christian message of Israel's Identity in a nutshell?
     Why is it such a "minority" belief and so maligned by it's 
      detractors?
----------------------------------------------------------- 
These are the core points of the Israel Identity message:
*   God has a New Covenant plan for physical (regenerate) Israel 
     today.
*   The "Jews" today are not Israelites but are impostors and 
     constitute (for the most part) true Christian IsraelUs greatest 
     enemies.
*   The Celto-Saxon, Germanic and kindred (white) peoples are 
     Israelites, the true descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and 
     Jacob/Israel.
*   The truth concerning the identity of modern-day Israel is not 
     only important, but vital for the body of Christ, for true Israel,
     and for the rest of the world.
*   This understanding is neither "Anti-Semitic," "Racist," nor 
     "White Supremacist"; but it is rather the correct teaching 
     concerning Israel as found in the Scriptures.
*   It is important to know the Truth, because "the Truth shall make 
     you free" (John 8:32).
 
     These points might sound strange at first because of the success 
of the Zionist propaganda campaign to promote the opposite 
position.  But, those coming to the truth of this matter would not be 
growing in number if there was no truth in it.  
     It is a known fact that a person does not change their beliefs 
easily.  It is much easier to believe as we have always believed.  
It seems safer to not "rock the boat" in our church, with our 
family, or in the company of our friends.  However, those who 
prefer to live in truth rather than fear will not let these obstacles 
suppress their search in order that they may know truth and live by 
it.
     At the same time, there are also those who do not want truth to 
reach the general public. They will do everything in their power to 
keep the populace ignorant.  Some are motivated out of a terror of 
being exposed while others have different reasons.  Maybe others 
simply don't want to change because they profit from the lies.  
Perhaps they are lazy and don't want to expend the effort to change 
the way they have always believed or done things.  For whatever 
reason, when these "terrible" truths are made public they orchestrate 
smear campaigns (through Hollywood, the media, schools, peers, as 
well as from the pulpits of JUDEO-Churchianity) for the purpose 
of labeling the Israel Identity message as simply "Anti-Semitism," 
"Racism," or "White Supremacy."  Some people, wanting the easy 
way out, will choose to believe this venom, but it is all to no avail.  
The facts are not going to change for our comfort or convenience, 
though some will try to make them do just that.
     The enemies of truth who oppose honest investigation and 
inquiry into this matter seem to have a standard reaction.  Their first 
attempted defense is to ignore the exposure and hope that it does 
not get widespread recognition.  The next step is to ridicule the 
information and the person or persons giving the information.  If 
that doesn't work, the next step is character assassination, which 
usually is done through the asking of unsubstantiated questions to 
insinuate a lack of credibility or "evil" intent of the person or the 
sources they use to make their case.  If the author or speaker hasn't 
been involved in sufficient scandal, they fabricate one against the 
person or persons.  If these don't work, they have been known to 
resort to more direct means of intimidation and even physical 
attacks.
     Some are afraid to address the subject and do not speak out for 
"fear of the Jews" (John 7:13).  This fear and unbelief is an insult to 
Jesus the Christ and is a damnable sin.  This lack of belief in and 
fear of (YHWH) God will be our destruction.  "And fear not them 
which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear 
him which is able to destroy both soul and body in (hell)" (Matt. 
10:28).  The fearful, cowardly and unbelieving get top billing of 
those whose "place will be in the lake which burns with fire and 
brimstone: which is the second death" (Rev. 21:8).  This is a terrible 
price to pay for such a lack of love and faith.  Pray that your 
redeemer, Jesus the Christ, might help your unbelief and give you 
courage!
     A lack of courage in our duty to bring all men to Christ's 
Salvation and Truth (I Tim. 2:4) is a failure to recognize what kind 
of Spirit we were given.  "For God has *not* given us the spirit of 
fear; but of POWER, and of LOVE, and of a SOUND MIND.  Be 
therefore not ashamed of the testimony of our Lord...who has saved 
us, and called us with an holy calling, not according to our own 
works, but according to His own purpose and grace, which was 
given us in Christ Jesus before the world began" (2 Timothy 1:7-9).
     Perfect love knows no fear and truth fears no investigation.  
"There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because 
fear hath torment.  He that feareth is not made perfect in love" (I 
John 4:18).  If you fear to search out the truth, or fear the anti-
Christs in their attempts to prevent the truth from being told, you 
don't have love like you out to have it.
 
 
2.  What difference does the Israel-Identity Christian message 
      make?
----------------------------------------------------------- 
     The identity of Israel is primarily important because it is the 
truth and Christ desires that "all men be saved AND come to the
knowledge of the truth," (1 Tim. 2:4). 
     It is important to discover the true identity of Israel (redeemed 
white people called of God) so that they may be restored to their 
rightful purpose and duty.  That purpose is a duty of servanthood to 
their God and His world (Gen. 1:27-28; Matt. 28:18-20).  
     In this great commission, after having been redeemed and 
brought into God's Kingdom, He asks them to begin to make a 
difference in their world.  It starts by reforming their lives, their 
families, and their daily walk before Him and men.  Evangelism 
means teaching people of the Kingdom of God and to obey His 
Law-Word, through the empowering of God's Spirit.  Evangelism 
means obedience.  This is the message of Jesus as it is recorded in 
the Gospel of John (14:15):  "If you love me, keep my 
commandments."  Love never contradicts God's Law-Word, but 
rather is a fulfilling of the Law (Romans 2:13; 6:1-2).  Law has 
dominion over all men (Rom. 7:1), but those who come into Christ's 
redemptive grace and walk by a desire to keep His commandments 
are truly free from the judgments of the law which leads to death.  
Through our Love for Him, He helps us obey His commandments.  
For we know that those who live after their own law will die and are 
at enmity with God, but those who live after Christ's Law-Word 
shall live (Rom. 8:1-13).  So, this great commission is to save the 
world from the law of carnal men that leads to death, by the saving 
power of God's Law-Word which leads to life.
     The Bible tells us that all of creation groans for the revealing of 
the sons of God:
     "For the anxious longing of the creation waits eagerly for the 
revealing of the sons of God.  For the creation was subjected to 
futility, not of its own will, but because of Him who subjected it, in 
hope that the creation itself also will be set free from its slavery to 
corruption into the freedom of the glory of the children of God 
(redeemed Israel).  For we know that the whole creation groans and 
suffers the pains of childbirth..." (Romans 8:19-22)   
     Who are these sons of God?  We are given a clue in verses 14 & 
15 in chapter 8 of Romans, "For as many as are led by the Spirit of 
God, they are the sons of God.  For you have not received the spirit 
of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, 
whereby we cry, Abba, Father."
     The prophet Hosea prophesied that the Israelites (not "Jews") 
would become sons of God (i.e. Christians).  At the time of Hosea, 
the Israelites were divided into two nations known as the house of 
Israel and the House of Judah.  Hosea said in Hosea 1:10,11 that 
those Israelites who were cast off (divorced) by God (and no longer 
known as "His people") would be gathered together under one 
leader (who was Christ) and be called the "sons of the living God."  
This was confirmed in the Covenant Christ made with these two 
nations of Israelites described in Hebrews 8:8-10.
     God has used other peoples for His purposes when Israel has 
been delinquent in her duty.   It is not ultimately "imperative," 
though important to Christ, to define "Israel" and return them to 
their duty.  Even though Christ came only to Israelites (Matt. 15:24) 
and is very concerned about them being fed, tended and shepherded 
(John 21:15-17), God's plan will be carried out even if He has to 
raise up children of Abraham from the very stones (Luke 3:8).  
     It *is* imperative to remove the pretenders who are fighting 
against God's purposes on His earth in the name of "Israel," (I Cor. 
15:25; Luke 19:27).  THE imperative duty of every creature is to 
fear God and see that His Will be done *on Earth* as it is in 
heaven (Eccl. 12:13,14; Matt. 6:10).  God's plan for the world is to 
bring freedom, life and salvation into it through His servants, i.e. 
Christ and everyone who follows Him (John 3:16; John 17:3; 
Romans 6:4,23 & 8::34-39; 2 Cor. 3:17; Gal. 5:1, etc, etc.).  This 
can't be done when an usurper is using the name of God's chosen 
people in direct opposition to God's plan.
     The impostors (self-styled "Jews") who have attempted to steal 
the birthright of true Israel (to rule & reign as kings and priests with 
God - Ex 19:3-6) are, in reality, simply God's punishing rod on His 
rebellious people (Israel) to return them back to Him and His duty 
for them.  The "Jews" have been unleashed to beat His true Israel 
people until they have finally had enough and will repent (turn back 
and obey Him).  Until God's true Israel people repent, they will 
continue to suffer the curses for disobedience as outlined in 
Deuteronomy 28, which includes the worst of the heathen ruling 
over and devouring them, (Deut. 28:33,43-52).
     Modern Churchianity has failed to heed the warning of Col. 2:8 
"Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, 
after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not 
after Christ," because they have dropped the charge given to them in 
II Corinthians 10:5.  Most "churches" have not heard this warning 
and have passively accepted these "Jewish Fables and 
commandments (traditions) of men" (Titus 1:14).  Thus, their 
message has become impotent and of no affect in bringing life and 
liberty into the world.
     A redeemed and awakened Israel to their Identity and duty 
toward God will again catch the Spirit that indwelled the men of 
Marlborough, Connecticut in 1773 when they made this unanimous 
proclamation:
     "Death is more eligible than slavery.  A freeborn people are not 
required by the religion of Jesus Christ to submit to tyranny, but 
may make use of such power as God has given them to recover and 
support their laws and liberties... (we) implore the Ruler above the 
skies, that He would make bare His arm in the defense of His 
church and people, and let Israel go." ('The Light and the Glory,' by 
Peter Marshal and David Manuel, p. 267)
 
 
3. What is the *central* proof of the Israel-Identity Christian 
     message?  What about the so-called "Messianic Jews"?
----------------------------------------------------------- 
    Genetic evidence is not "central" to the Israel-Identity Christian 
message.  If anything, genetics, science and His(S)tory supply 
supporting and confirming evidence of God's plan for His people 
and the world.   The Bible, God's Law-Word, is the central source 
and authority of the Israel-Identity Christian message.
    God's history, as recorded in his Word, establishes the character 
of His major players on His world-stage (ie. His sheep, Jacob/Israel 
and His enemies, the dogs, goats and specifically - Esau/Edom -
Romans 9:13) and reveals the standards by which we can distinguish
them.  "By their fruits you shall know them" (Matt. 7:20),  "My 
sheep hear My voice and they follow Me"(John 10:27),  "If you 
obey the Lord your God...these  blessings shall come upon you..." 
(Deut. 28:1,2), "I will put My law upon their minds and I will write
them upon their hearts (Hebrews 8:10)," etc, etc.  
     Those who obey and follow Christ are His people (Gal. 3:29) 
and those who denounce and hate Christ are anti-Christ enemies 
(I John 2:22,23).  So THE central proof of Israel's Identity would
be the acceptance of Christ Jesus as Saviour, Messiah and God.  
     While the majority of people following after Christ and 
attempting to do His will are the Celto-Saxon, Germanic and 
kindred (white) peoples, the self-styled "Jewish" impostors hate 
Christ, Christianity, and oppose His will.  For example:
     "The widespread idea that the Jews, while rejecting Jesus' claim 
to divinity, consider him a great teacher and moral figure is 
completely false.  We don't accept his claims and we are oblivious 
to his teachings; we are simply not interested in him nor in what he 
has to say,  any more than Christians are interested in Mohammed."  
- 'Living Jewish - The Lore and Law of the Practicing Jew' by 
Michel Asheri.
     They further give us reason why they are enemies of Christ and 
Christianity in the Jewish Encyclopedia edition of 1925, vol. 5, page 
41 which states, "Edom is in modern Jewry."  The significance of 
this admission becomes more clear when we understand the 
struggle between Jacob and Esau for the birthright and get an 
understanding of why God stated that He loved Jacob and hated 
Esau (Edom) in Romans 9:13.  We suggest the book "Who is 
Esau/Edom," by Charles Weisman, for an exhaustive study on the 
subject (made available below).
       As another witness, Rabbi Meir Kahane has stated: 
      "I have not the slightest sympathy for Christianity or Jesus.  As 
a believing Jew, not only is Jesus not "God" but he is neither 
Messiah nor prophet.  For the Jew he was a blasphemer, one who 
attacked the Torah as unchanging divine law and who was a false 
prophet and heretic.  ...As for Christianity, this is the faith that, in 
the name of Jesus, has made life for the Jewish people a living hell 
for 19 centuries.  In its name, and in the name of Jesus, millions of 
Jews were massacred and the agony of life under Christians can 
never be sufficiently described in all its horror."  The Jewish Press, 
N.Y. Jan 6, 1989, page 49 
      Rabbi Kahane laments about Jewish persecution under 
Christians.  Is this a just complaint or merely due justice deserved?  
Are not the modern day "Jews" the inheritors of the judgment that 
their spiritual predecessors called down upon themselves when they 
stated to Pilate "Let His blood be upon us and our children" (Matt. 
27:25)?  Do these people really have any right to complain if they 
continue in the spirit of those early Jews who persecuted those who 
followed Christ in Judea, who "both killed the Lord Jesus and their 
own prophets, and have persecuted us (Christians); and they please 
not God, and are contrary to all men"?
     Some want to point to the so-called "Messianic Jews" or "Jews 
for Jesus."  The glaring fact that they still refer to themselves as 
"Jews" is an omission of their true lack of submission and sincerity 
toward Christ (Colossians 2:18-23).  Their pride in their own 
identity as "Jews" (I Corinthians 2:1-3), and their traditions (Mark 
7:8-9), supersedes what a true repentant servant of Christ would 
think of themselves.  
     The Apostle Paul referred to himself as a "prisoner", a "debtor," 
a "slave" and a "servant" who surrendered his life and identity to 
Christ so that Christ might live through Him (Gal. 2:15-21).  Gal. 
3:26-28 speaks of this surrender and submersion of our own 
identity into the identity of Christ and His body.  We "put on 
Christ" and His name, i.e. CHRISTians when we are baptized into 
Christ's death and Resurrection (Romans 6, Col 2, etc.)  We are 
then no longer known as "Jew," or "Greek," or whatever, but rather 
as CHRISTIAN.  Why then not call themselves Christian?  Why 
cling to their identity as "Jews"?  We read about what these "Jews"
really mean by the term "Messianic Jews" in Q#4 in Baruch Levy's 
letter.  The very term is blasphemy.  The Messiah has already 
come and He is Jesus the Christ.  The "Jews" are not the Messiah
or "Messianic" in any way.
      Dr. Benjamin Freidman was a converted Jew to Christianity 
who dedicated his whole fortune and life to bringing to light the 
religion of the "Jews" and the teachings of their Talmud.  To quote 
from his letter to Dr. Goldstein, which was compiled into a booklet 
entitled 'Facts are Facts' (made available below), he said:
     "Stimulated by this statement by an imminent Jewish Rabbi 
every Christian especially every pastor should take time to 
investigate if this is true.  Ask yourself, what do I know about the 
Talmud?  From the birth of Jesus to the present there has never 
been recorded a more vicious, vile and libelous blasphemy against 
Jesus and Christians then you will find in the pages of these 63 
volumes.  The Talmud reviles Christ and Christians in unbelievably 
foul, obscene, indecent, lewd and vile language."
     Rabbi Morris N. Kertzer, Director of Interreligious Activities for 
the American Jewish Committee, considered the Talmud essential to 
the training of rabbis because it is the legal basis for their religious 
law:
     "The TALMUD consists of 63 books of legal, ethical and 
historical writings of the ancient rabbis.  It was edited five centuries 
after the birth of Jesus.  It is a compendium of law and lore.  It is 
the legal code which forms the basis of Jewish religious law and it 
is the textbook used in the training of rabbis."  ("What is a Jew," by 
Rabbi Morris N. Kertzer, quoted in LOOK Magazine, 17 June 
1952)
      As former followers of the religion of Judaism (Talmudism) 
these so called "Messianic Jews" know it's anti-Christian basis and 
hatred for Christ better than any other.  Their identification with the 
Talmudic "Jews", and their failure to warn the Christians as to the 
true nature of these people and their religion, is a glaring admission 
of where their true sympathies are.  For it is the duty of every 
Christian to "let love be without hypocrisy, abhor what is evil and 
cling to what is good" (Romans 12:9).
      With these witnesses is there any doubt as to where the self-
styled "Jews" stand?  If you are still unsure, listen to the warnings 
of your Saviour King, Christ Jesus:  "Jesus therefore said to those 
Jews which had not believed him,..Ye (Jews) are of your father the 
devil, and the lusts of your father it is your will to do...He that is of 
God heareth the words of God:  for this cause, ye (Jews) hear them 
not, because ye are not of God."  (John 8:31,44,47)   and,
      "I know...the blasphemy by those who say they are 'Jews' and 
are not, but are a synagogue of Satan."  (Rev 2:9)
     "Who is the liar, but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ?" (I 
John 2:22.)  Who is the liar indeed?  We have just seen who denies 
that Jesus is the Christ in word, deed and action.
 
 
4.  Isn't the "Jewish" god the God of the Old Testament?  Isn't this 
     why we refer to the popular belief in Christ as the 
     "Judeo"-Christian religion?
----------------------------------------------------------- 
     Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser wrote in "Judaism and the Christian 
Predicament" (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1967) p. 59:  "This is 
not an uncommon impression and one finds it sometimes among 
Jews as well as Christians - that Judaism is the religion of the 
Hebrew Bible.  It is, of course, a fallacious impression... Judaism is 
*not* the religion of the Bible."  
     Rabbi Moshe M. Maggal, wrote:  "...you will notice the great 
difference between the Jewish and Christian religions.  But these are 
not all.  We consider the two religions so different that one excludes 
the other.  ...we emphasized that there is no such thing as a Judeo-
Christian religion.  ...There is not any similarity between the two 
concepts."  Rabbi Maggal (President, National Jewish Information 
Service) letter, 21 August 1961.
      So what is the nature of the "Jewish" god?  It is not the God of 
the Hebrew Bible as we have just seen by their own admission.  
They have no need of the concept of God as they have "killed off 
God" a long time ago as James Yaffe comments:  
      "And so it seems we must agree with Rabbi Richard Israel, who 
writes in "Commentary's" symposium on Jewish belief, "[The 
current discussion on] the Death of God will cause Jews to ask, 'So 
what else is new?' ... The Jewish funeral was a much more private 
affair.  We buried him [YHWH-God] quietly and in the middle of 
the night." -- James Yaffe, "The American Jews" (New York: 
Random House, 1968) 161
      James Yaffe's statement was a comment to a statement made by 
Rabbi Sherwin Wine of the Birmingham Temple:  "...the whole 
concept of God is outdated; Judaism can function perfectly well 
without it." 
     If the self-styled "Jews" have "killed off God", then what sort of 
"god" do they have?  The Jewish God is the "Jew" as the Jewish 
Cabala (Kabbalah) puts it: "The Jew is the living God, God 
incarnate: he is the heavenly man.  The other men are earthly, of 
inferior race.  They exist only to serve the Jew.  They are the cattle 
seed."  Who are the supremacists?  "You will know them by their
fruits..."  
      In the following quote we begin to understand this "Jewish" 
idea of their "god" a little better as it is applied more directly to 
today:   "The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah.  It 
will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the 
abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy, and by the 
establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere 
exercise the privilege of citizenship.  In this *new world order* the 
children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering 
opposition.  The Governments of the different peoples forming the 
world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews.  
It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private 
property, and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state.  
Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said 
that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the 
property of the whole world in their hands."  -Baruch Levy, Letter to 
Karl Marx, 'La Revue de Paris', p. 574, June 1, 1928
 
 
5. Who are these self-styled "Jews" then if they are not Israelites?
----------------------------------------------------------- 
     One American Jew woke up to the lie after living in the Israeli 
occupational state in Palestine.  He put it this way:  
     "The American people have been led to believe that Jews are 
"God's chosen people."  This myth was started by a small group of 
Jews.  A few Jewish leaders took excerpts from the Bible and 
interpreted them to mean that God designated them as "chosen 
people." ...
     "Leading the cry, 'We are God's Chosen People,' are the 
Zionist/Marxist (Ashkenazi) Jews who for political purposes chose 
Judaism and who don't have a drop of biblical Jewish blood in 
them....
     "The Judeo-Christian ethic we hear so much about in America is 
a big joke - the result of an intense Zionist propaganda campaign.
     "I'll toss in one last thought about the "God's chosen people" 
myth: God said, "Beware of those who call themselves Jews and are 
not, for they lie."  Could it be the Ashkenazi Jews are the people to 
whom God was referring?"  - Jack Bernstein, "The Life of an 
American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel" (California: The Noontide 
Press, 1984) p.15-17 (To order this book see end of FAQ)
      In their own writings these self-styled "Jews" tell us it is 
incorrect to call a contemporary "Jew" an "Israelite" or a "Hebrew."  
Under the heading "A Brief History of the Terms for Jew," in the 
1980 Jewish Almanac, is the following:   "Strictly speaking it is 
*incorrect* to call an ancient Israelite a "Jew" or to call a 
contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew." 1980 Jewish Almanac, 
P.3
     In "The Pharisees--The Sociological Background of Their 
Faith," Rabbi Louis Finkelstein describes these self-styled "Jews" 
and their origins:
     "Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval 
Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism.  
But throughout these changes in name...the spirit of the ancient 
Pharisee survives unaltered.  When the Jew studies the Talmud, he 
is actually repeating the arguments used in the Palestinian 
academies..."  "...rabbinic Judaism, the first-born child of 
Pharisaism, remains a unit until this day."  (p.XXI of Forward to 1st 
Edition, "The Pharisees," Vol. 1, Philadelphia: The Jewish 
Publication Society of America, 1938 & Vol. 2, p. 622
     Jesus had quite a verbal scathing for the Pharisees in Matthew 
23.  He exposed them for the sort of people they were:  
"Hypocrites," "sons of hell," "blind guides," "fools," "full of 
robbery and self-indulgence," "whitewashed tombs...full of dead 
men's bones and all uncleanness," "full of hypocrisy and 
lawlessness," "partners with them in shedding the blood of the 
prophets," and "serpents and brood of vipers."  Not quite an 
endorsement by the One and Only Sovereign God, Jesus the Christ, 
is it?  And some fools have the gall, or should we say "Chutzpah," 
to call Jesus a "Jew!"  What blasphemy!  
     Professor of Medieval Jewish History, Abraham N. Poliak of 
Tel Aviv University, has stated "The large majority of world Jewry 
is descended from the Jews of Khazaria." ("The Thirteenth Tribe" 
by Arthur Koestler (New York: Random House, 1976) p.226) 
(Made available below.)
     The people living in Palestine in the 20th century have no racial 
or historic connection with Palestine and are, in reality, descendants 
from a Turko-Mongolian tribal people who created a kingdom 
called Khazaria which existed until the 12th century.  These 
Khazarian "Jews" could just as easily have practiced Christianity, 
but for whatever reason they chose Judaism (Talmudic Pharisaism) 
and there is nothing that can be done about it.
     Obviously, if these people have *no racial, or historic connection 
with Palestine* they have no claim to the promises made to 
Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel or the land known as "Israel" 
(Palestine) today.
     If this is true then there should be more evidence to support this 
position, and there is.  The American People's Encyclopedia for 
1964 at 15-292 records the following reference to Khazars:
    "In the year 740 the Khazars were officially converted to 
Judaism.  A century later they were cursed by the in-coming Slavic-
speaking people and were scattered over central Europe where they 
were known as Jews.  It is from this grouping that most German 
and Polish Jews are descended, and they likewise make up a 
considerable part of that population now found in America.  The 
term Aschenazim is now applied to this....division."
     Alfred Lilienthal writes, in What Price Israel (Henry Regenery 
Co., 1953)  "Perhaps the most significant mass conversion to the 
Judaic Faith occurred in Europe, in the 8th century A.D., and that 
story of the Khazars (Turko-Finnish people) is quite pertinent to the 
establishment of the modern state of Israel."  Again, "That the 
Khazars are the lineal ancestors of Eastern European Jewry is a 
historical fact.  Jewish historians and religious textbooks 
acknowledge the fact, though the propagandists of Jewish 
nationalism belittle it as pro-Arab propaganda."
     Arthur Koestler's book 'The Thirteenth Tribe' (New York: 
Random House, Inc., 1976) blew the lid off this suppressed fact.  
Koestler notes, "In the 1960's, the number of the Sephardim was 
estimated at 500,000.  The Ashkenazim, at the same period, 
numbered about eleven million.  Thus in common parlance, Jew is 
synonymous with Ashkenazi Jew."  He further states, "For the sake 
of piquantry it should be mentioned that the Ashkenaz of the Bible 
refers to a people living somewhere in the vicinity of Mount Ararat 
and Armenia.  The name occurs in Genesis 10:3 and 1 Chronicles 
1:6 as one of the sons of Gomer, who was a son of Japhet.  
Ashkenaz is also a brother of Togarmah (and a nephew of Magog) 
whom the Khazars, according to King Joseph, claimed as their 
ancestor."
     Koestler further quotes an early source indicating that the 
Khazars had some connection with Gog of the land of Magog.  "At 
some date earlier than 864, the Westphalian monk, Christian 
Druthmar of Acquitania, wrote a Latin treatise 'Esposito in 
Evangelium Mattei,' in which he reported that 'there exist people 
under the sky in regions where no Christian can be found, whose 
name is Gog and Magog, and who are Huns; among them is one, 
called the Gazari (Khazars) who are circumcised and observe 
Judaism in its entirety.'"  For those interested in Bible prophecy, the 
implications of this last sentence are staggering.  Read Genesis 
10:2-3 to see from whom Ashkenaz descended; notice who his 
relatives are.  Then read Ezekiel 38 & 39.
    Jewish author Alfred Lilienthal further stated: "These 
Ashkenazim Jews...have little or no trace of Semitic blood." - p. 
222, "What Price Israel."  This is now understandable from what 
Koestler revealed.
    The Jews fully understand their Khazarian heritage as the third 
edition of the Jewish Encyclopedia for 1925 records:
    "Chazars: a people of Turkish origin whose life and history are 
interwoven with the very beginnings of the history of the Jews of 
Russia." The Jewish Encyclopedia, Third Edition, 1925
     There are two main "racial" branches of modern Jewry.  The 
smaller of the two is called the Sephardim, some of whose ancestors 
fled after the fall of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. and spread across North 
Africa to Spain.  This group has been from the outset so small, in 
terms of a viable gene pool, and has mixed with such regularity over 
the centuries with the indigenous peoples wherever they lived that 
Dr. Raphael Patai, a leading Jewish scholar, felt compelled to write a 
book entitled 'The Myth of the Jewish Race' (Scribners, 1975).  In 
reviewing an earlier work by Dr. Patai, 'Israel Between East and 
West,' Dr. Camille Honig, literary editor for the Voice (Jewish 
Voice of California, Sept. 25, 1953), stated:  "If you studied Jewish 
types and communities in five continents, as this writer had the 
opportunity of doing, you would have realized that it is sheer 
nonsense, and very dangerous nonsense, as well as unscientific, to 
speak about a Jewish race."  
     In a book entitled "Races in Europe", the author, William Z. 
Ripley, states under ethnology:  "The findings of physical 
anthropology show that contrary to all popular view, there is no 
Jewish race.  "Our conclusion then is final.  It is paradoxical yet 
true, we affirm.  The Jews are not a race, but only a people after all."
     Perhaps it can be understood why this is.  The World Book 
Encyclopedia states:  "The Jews were once a sub-type of the 
Mediterranean race, but they have mixed with other peoples until the 
name Jew has lost all racial meaning."
     Since the majority of people in modern Palestine and the world 
who call themselves "Jews" are descendants from a "Turko-
Mongolian tribal people" known as Khazars, and have "little or no 
trace of Semitic blood in them," but are rather descendants of 
Ashkenaz who was one of the sons of Gomer, who was a son of 
Japheth, then anyone who would be critical or oppose these people 
cannot be anti-Semitic.  Anti-impostors, anti-liars, anti-deceivers, 
anti-con artists, anti-Christ haters, yes.  But anti-Semitic, no.
 
 
6.  Is the Israel Identity Christian message "anti-semitic"?
----------------------------------------------------------- 
     The term "anti-semitism" is a nonsense smear word that is 
used to intimidate and silence those who would criticize the "Jews."
Albert Einstein exposed the true origins and use of anti-semitism by
the "Jews" when he said:  "Anti-Semitism is nothing but the 
antagonistic attitude produced in the non-Jew by the Jewish group.
The Jewish group has thrived on oppression and on the antagonism
it has forever met in the world."  (Collier's Magazine, Nov. 26, 1938)
Einstein was describing their common use of "chutzpah" for their 
own gain and profit while crying "persecution."
      Mr. Koestler, in his book, 'The Thirteenth Tribe,' stated the 
following:  "In this last chapter I have tried to show that the evidence 
from Anthropology concurs with history in refuting the popular 
belief in a Jewish race descended from a biblical tribe." p. 199
     He again stated on p. 226, "Nevertheless the lingering influence 
of Judaism's racial and historical message, *though based on 
illusion*, acts as a powerful emotional break by appealing to tribal 
loyalty....  It is perhaps symbolic that Abraham Poliak, a professor 
of history at Tel Aviv University and no doubt an Israeli patriot, 
made a major contribution to our knowledge of Jewry's Khazar 
ancestry, *undermining the legend of the Chosen Race.*"  
     It is interesting to know that Random House advertised 
Koestler's book quite extensively and began some of their ads with 
the headline:  "What if Most Jews Aren't Really Semites at All?"  
Not only should most "Jews" be asking themselves this question 
but so should modern-day Christians.
     Identifying Israel today, while at the same time exposing the self-
styled "Jews" as impostors, cannot properly be labeled "Anti-
Semitism" as we have seen in (Q#5 above), because the people 
known as "Jews" today are primarily of Japheth's lineage, rather 
than Shem's.  They have virtually no Shemite (Semite) blood 
running through their veins except for a trace of Edomite blood 
which is present through intermarriage from an earlier time in their 
history as revealed in the Jewish Encyclopedia edition of 1925, vol. 
5, page 41 ("Edom is in Modern Jewry"). 
     On the other hand, the majority of the white race is a race which 
has descended from Noah's son Shem and, consequently, is 
predominantly Semitic.  Many of the white race today are accused 
of being anti-Semitic.  What utter nonsense.  The accused are 
Semites!  If you want to identify people who are truly Anti-Semite, 
find the people who are anti-White and anti-Christ
     "Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of 
hate - healthy, virile hate - for what the German personifies and for 
what persists in the German." - Elie Wiesel, "Legends of Our Time" 
(Hold, Rinehart and Winston, 1968) p. 142
 
 
7.  What is the difference between a Semite, a Hebrew, an Israelite, 
      and a "Jew"?  Are these terms equivalent in any way and can they
      be used interchangeably?
----------------------------------------------------------- 
(From: "The Answering Service" Index by the late Pastor Sheldon 
Emry)
     A Semite (or, "Shemite") is someone descended from Shem, one 
of the sons of Noah.  A Hebrew is someone descended from Heber 
(or, "Eber"), one of the great-grandsons of Shem.  So all Hebrews 
are Semites, but not all Semites are Hebrews.
     Six generations after Heber, Abraham was born to his line, so 
Abraham was both a Hebrew and a Semite, born of the line of 
Heber and Shem. 
     Isaac was born of Abraham; then Jacob of Isaac.  Jacob's name 
was changed to "Israel," and he fathered 12 sons.  His sons and 
their descendants are called Israelites, and they would be both 
Semitic and Hebrew.  However, this would not make either 
Abraham or Isaac "Israelites."  Some, who interchange the words 
"Jew" and Israelite, call Abraham a Jew, even though Abraham was 
not even an Israelite, and the word "Jew" is not used in the Bible 
until 1,000 years after Abraham.
     One of Jacob-Israel's children was Judah (Hebrew - Yehudah).  
His descendants were called Yehudim ("Judahites").  In Greek this 
reads Ioudaioi ("Judeans").
      The confusing factor is that almost all Bible translations employ 
the word "Jew," which is a modern, shortened form of the word 
"Judahite."  Every time you come to the word "Jew" in the Old 
Scriptures, you should read "Judahite;" and every time you come to 
the word "Jew" in the New Scriptures, you should read it as 
"Judean."
     Once you have those proper translations in mind, then we have to 
interpret those words further, because they can have more than one 
meaning, depending on the context.  In the Old Testament, the word 
"Judahite" has three distinct usage's: (1) one who is of the tribe of 
Judah in a racial sense; (2) one who is a citizen of the southern 
"House of Judah," including the tribes of Benjamin and Levi.  Thus, 
this word can be used either tribally (racially) or geographically 
(nationally).  (3) This is also used in a religious sense of those who 
followed the religion of Judah.  At the time of Esther, many non-
Israelites "became Jews" (that is, Judahites) as the result of the 
Judahite victory (Esther 8:17).
     In the New Testament, the Greek word Ioudeos should be 
translated "Judean."  Again, this term was used in the same manner:  
(1) one who is of the tribe of Judah in the racial sense; (2) one who 
is a citizen of the province of Judea (as opposed to Galilee and 
Samaria), as is shown in John 7:1.  This usage is geographical, and 
it applied also to the non-Israelite citizens of Judea who had been 
incorporated into the nation in 135 B.C.; and (3) a follower of the 
religion of Judah as given by Moses and the prophets.  This usage 
is found in Romans 2:28 and 29.
     Most churches today make no distinction between these terms.  
One of their arguments is that the Apostle Paul said in Romans 11:1 
that he was an "Israelite," and then in Phil. 3:5 he called himself "a 
Hebrew of the Hebrews."  Therefore, they say, the terms are 
identical, and by implication they include the word "Jew" as well.  
However, Paul was also a Benjamite (Rom. 11:1), but the fact that 
he descended from Benjamin, Israel, and Heber did not mean that all 
of these men were the same person.
           Therefore, we can say:
1.  All Israelites are Hebrews and Semites.
2.  Only a few of the Israelites were called Jews (or, Judahites, 
     Judeans).
3.  Many non-Israelites were called Jews (Judahites, Judeans) 
     simply because they lived in Judah or claimed to follow the 
     religion of the Judeans.
 
 
8.  Is the Israel Identity Christian message "racist" and "white 
     supremacist?"  What about 'non-white' races?  Inferior?  
     Superior?  Equal?  
----------------------------------------------------------- 
     Every race was created by God (Col. 1:16) unique and different.  
God called His creation *good* (I Timothy 4:4).
     He established the order of "kind after kind."  Every creature, 
beast and "race" of people were to reproduce after their own kind.  
Thus Christians should love and strive to keep each race in it's pure 
form, for God called ALL of His creation good according to His 
own purpose.
     Man's belief in equality is a hatred of the unique traits of every 
"race" God created.  Man hates what God called good if he mixes 
the races through interracial marriage which ultimately destroys the 
uniqueness of each racial type.  Each race has its superior traits and 
inferior ones.  There is no race that can claim "superiority" in 
everything, the key point is that they are *unique* and good 
according to His own purpose.  
     It is the duty of every Christian to preserve God's creation and 
defend the order He established! ("Kind after kind.")  The Christian 
("Identity") message is that of love for all races and a desire to 
preserve them as God created them.  If anyone claiming to be a 
Christian, "Identity" or otherwise, preaches hatred of any original 
racial type for simply being what God created them, then they are 
not preaching the Word of God, but rather that which is contrary to 
His Will.
     We are told in the parables of Christ that what God did not plant 
will be uprooted and burned (Matt. 13:25-30).  God did not create 
racially mixed people, that is man's doing through man's rejection of 
God's law-order of "kind after kind". 
     God demonstrated his dislike for the mixing of the races by 
saving only one man, Noah and we find out why in Gen.6:9,  
"These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and 
PERFECT in his GENERATIONS, and Noah walked with God."
     The word "generations" in the Hebrew concordance (Strong's 
#8435), means "descent, family, history, birth-generations."  Noah 
was perfect in all of his descent or family, there could not then have 
been any "mixed" seed in his genealogy.  We see in Genesis 11:6, 
"And the Lord said, Behold, the people is *one*."  (#259 - 
Strong's).  The meaning here is that the people were united, 
undivided, or had mixed racially, instead of being separate peoples 
and going forth to multiply and replenish the earth as God had 
commanded.  God not only saved Noah because he was perfect in 
his generations, but also because he "walked with God," which is 
just another way of saying He obeyed God's commandments to be 
separate and holy unto Him.
     Jesus came as a sword (Matt. 10:34, Rev. 2:12,16; 19:13-15), to 
divide out a people for Himself.  In Matt. 10: 5&6, Christ instructed 
His disciples to not go "into the way of the heathen, but rather go 
unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel."  Christ's message was 
not of inclusion; but separation.  All throughout Jesus' parables we 
read how he came to separate the sheep from the goats, the wheat 
from tares, the good seed from the bad seed, etc.  Separation is the 
message of the Gospel of the Kingdom of God.
     Most Pastors are taking the safeQand profitableQroad by 
preaching "love" as a code-word for liberal "non-exclusion."  We 
Christians must surely preach the accomplishment of Christ on the 
Cross, and all that it provides for those who surrender to and accept 
it in repentance and faith, but today it is importantQcritically 
importantQto draw an absolute distinction between "whosoever 
will" (follow Christ) and the leftist spawned false universalist non-
exclusion doctrine, which has most denominations bringing 
Buddhist monks, Islamic clerics, shamans, witches, homosexuals 
and, of course, Rabbis into their congregations to "teach" that, after 
all, we all worship the same God.
     On what basisQand whyQdid God separate Cain from Abel, 
Abraham from his worldly family, Isaac from Ishmael, Jacob from 
Esau?  Read Leviticus 16 about the annual ritual God gave as a 
statute to the Israelites, which He called the Day of Atonement.  
Consider carefully the significance of the two goats which were 
chosen by lot (a method of choosing which indicated God's choice), 
and their subsequent fates.  We read that we did not choose God 
but rather Jesus the Christ (God in the flesh) chose us, the white 
Israelite race.  It was a matter of choice, HIS Sovereign choice, and 
He separated them from out of the world not to be "superior" but to 
be a chosen generation (NASV says "race"), and a holy nation for 
His own possession (I Peter 2:9; John 6:44,45; II Cor. 6:17). 
     Unfortunately, the "chosen" or favored child is usually hated and 
envied by the other children as we read about in the story of Joseph 
(Genesis. 37:3-) and how he was sold to the Egyptians into slavery 
by his brothers because of their father's special favor toward 
Joseph.  But Joseph was blessed by this and raised up by God to 
eventually save his brothers and family when we read the "rest of 
the story."  So shall it be with true Christian Israel and the other 
peoples of the world when Israel is returned to their God and His 
duty for them.
     God's ways have always been "repent" or "perish."  Man can't 
blame God for the evil that man creates when he rebels against 
God's law-order.  Man has only himself to blame if he is 
responsible for mixing the races.  Any suffering brought about by 
the sin of inter-racial marriage is the responsibility of rebellious 
man, not God!
     "Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they 
separated from Israel all the mixed (mongrel) multitude" (Neh. 13:3, 
Josh. 23:12-13, etc.).
     Identifying the white peoples as Israel cannot be correctly 
labeled "White Supremacy" because this teaching does not elevate 
one race above another but separates them and mandates that one 
race (the white race) be a servant unto God and others by *God's* 
standards.  It is not "White Supremacy"; if anything, it is "White 
Servanthood."  As a rule, whenever the thought of race leads us to 
boastfulness or contempt, there is something false in it.  
     Israel was to be a blessing to the world.  They were given God's 
Law (Ps. 147:19-20) to be a model and "light" to the world through 
their obedience to and enforcement of His Law-Word.  Through 
their obedience they would be blessed and prosper and from these 
blessings were to teach the other people the Laws of God (Micah 
4:1,2; Rev.3:12; Rev. 21:1,2,10).  This is still Israel's duty (Gen. 
1:27-28; Matt. 28:18-20).  Christians (redeemed Israel) must begin 
applying the Great Commission, indeed, ALL of Scripture, to the 
fundamental institutions of social order: the family, the Church, and 
the State in order that nation after nation will bow before Him Who 
has "all Authority and Dominion in Heaven and on Earth," (Eph. 
1:21; I Timothy 6:14-16).  We do this by obeying His commands 
found in His Law-Word.  "For He must reign until He has put all 
His enemies under His feet," (I Cor. 15:25).
    His Word tells us, "All creation longs for the revealing of the 
Sons of God".  True Israel, the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Celtic, 
Scandinavian and kindred (white) peoples, have been a blessing to 
the world and continue to be at the for-front of fulfilling this duty.  
When true Israel wakes up to their identity and duty to their God, 
this will be manifested in an even greater way.  
 
 
9.  Can the redemption of the house of Israel through accepting the 
     Covenant offered by Christ, *only* be granted to descendants of 
     Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob?  Or is this same redemption available
     to all?  And if the same redemption is available to all, to black 
and 
     white, Khazar and non-Khazar, 'false' and 'true' Israelites, then 
     why does the 'identity' of the tribe of Israel matter?  How does 
     the redemption of different races or kinds or types differ,?
-----------------------------------------------------------
    Yes, only "Israel" can be "redeemed" (to be bought back).  Jesus 
Christ came to save His own (John 1:11) and to do this took on the 
very seed of Abraham (Hebrews 2:16) in order to keep the promise 
made to Abraham (Genesis 17:7).  He came into this world to 
REDEEM only Israel.  Salvation is another story and is to those 
who believe by faith.  Only true Israel was ever cast off and in need 
of being "bought back."  That Christ did come and did Redeem His 
people Israel is the testimony of the New Testament writers.  (See 
Luke 1:54-55,68-73, John 1:31, St. Matthew 15:24, Acts 5:31; 
13:23).  To keep the Law of Redemption (Lev. 25), Jesus Christ had 
to be genetically related to those that He redeemed.  Jesus the Christ 
was of the Seed of Abraham (Hebrews 2:16), of the Tribe of Judah 
(Hebrews 7:14), of the House of David (Romans 1:3), and of the 
Adamic 'race' (Matthew 1:1-16).  Besides, "original sin" (Gen. 3:6-
7, 17-19) only applies to Adam and His descendants (Romans 
5:12 also see Q#10).  Since the Bible is only a story about the 
Adamic family, specifically through Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel, 
we would expect it's specific application would generally be 
applicable only to Adamic Israelites in general.
    This does not mean that non-Israelites cannot put themselves 
under the dominion rule of Christ and under His Law-Covenant.  
Isa. 56 speaks of such people as receiving a *greater* reward, 
because they did and obeyed what was required of a people other 
than themselves.  This duty to the King of Kings and to the 
Covenant He made with Israel is one of dominion in Christ's name.  
Non-Israelites are welcome to pick up that commission and will be 
blessed for their service to the King of kings.  They shall be saved
by their faith.  
    Salvation is a consequence of redemption.  Here is how it works:
1.  Redemption is only through the King of kings, Christ Jesus (1 
     Tim. 6:14-16), as our great High Priest after the order of 
     Melchizedek (Hebrews chpts. 5-7), who has taken His seat at the 
     right hand of God (Heb. 8:1), and Has made a New Covenant 
     with His People, Israel (Heb. 8:8-10,13).
2.  When Israel is redeemed through Christ, they will again obey 
     His commandments and do their duty, i.e carry out His Will on 
     Earth (Heb. 3:18,19; Heb. 4:1,5,6,11).
3.  The duty of Israel is to bring everything into obedience to Christ 
     Jesus and His Law-Dominion (Romans 13:4, 1 Cor. 6:2; 2 Cor. 
     10:3-6, Hebrews. 10:26-31; Heb. 12:28,29; James 1:22-25).
4.  Through His Law-Dominion, peace, law and order will be 
     restored and all the earth shall be blessed and "saved" from those 
     who would oppress, enslave and destroy the people of God's 
     creation (Rev. chpts. 21 & 22).
 
     The key to redemption is a love for His Will to be done on Earth 
as it is in Heaven,  i.e. obedience.  "If you love Me, Keep (obey) My 
commandments" (Deut. 6:4-5, 11:1;  Matt. 22:40; I John 2:3,5).  If 
you love God, Christ Jesus, and hear His voice, you will seek out 
His plan of redemption and do what it requires of you.  This is 
merely doing our duty out of love for what He has already done for 
us in making our redemption possible by dying in our place to 
atone for our sins (rebellion against His Law - I John 3:4).  The 
plan for redemption is revealed in His New Covenant plan found in 
His Word.  We can attempt to sum it up in Matt. 28:18-20; John 
3:3,5; Acts 2:38; 8:37-39; 19:5; Romans 6; Gal. 3:27; Col. 2:11-14; 
Eph. 4:5; I Peter 3:21; etc, etc., but there is so much more.  Christ 
promised those who diligently seek shall find and those who hunger 
and thirst after it will find it. 
 
 
10.  What about Adam and Eve?  Were they of the white 'race' or 
        are they the mother and father of all the "races"?  
-----------------------------------------------------------
     We can not definitively answer these questions in the breadth 
and depth they should be answered because of space limitations, but 
we will try to give a brief over-view.  A good reference for an 
exhaustive study on the matter is "Origins of Race and Civilization," 
by Charles Weisman, which is made available below.
1.  Adam was white:
     The book we call the Bible is a family His(S)tory of God's 
people-- the generations of Adam and more specifically of his 
descendants through Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel.  All 
Scriptural evidence indicates Adam was created a white man.  The 
name "ADAM" (aw-dawm') in Hebrew means a "ruddy human 
being" (Strong's O.T. #120).  It is derived from Strong's O.T. #119 
- ADAM (aw-dam'), which means "to show blood (in the face), i.e. 
flush or turn rosy."  The attributes of skin color are described by 
one geneticist as follows:
     "The color of normal human skin is due to the presence of three 
kinds of colored chemicals, or pigments.  The most important of 
these pigments is melanin, a dark-brown substance... The second of 
the three pigments is carotene.  This is a yellow substance which is 
present in carrots (from which it gets its name) and egg yokes as 
well as human skin...  The third pigment is hemoglobin, which is the 
red coloring matter of blood...the hemoglobin occurs in the blood 
vessels beneath the skin, so that very little can show through..  The 
presence of fair amounts of either melanin or carotene in the skin 
covers it up completely.  Hemoglobin does show up however in the 
skin of white men, particularly in those of light complexion.  It is 
the hemoglobin that accounts for pink cheeks and the ability to 
blush."   -William C. Boyd, Ph.D.  'Races and People' (1955) 
pp.43-45
     Adam was fair and white which caused the hemoglobin (blood) 
to show in his skin making him look "ruddy" or to give him a 
"flush" look.  Thus the word "ADAM" is a descriptive name but 
here indicates certain physical characteristics that the man Adam 
possessed.  It is a common practice in both Hebrew and English 
languages to name something according to some *outstanding 
feature* or characteristic.  We thus call a bird a "red-headed 
woodpecker" because it has a red head and pecks wood.
     Adam was evidently called or named "ADAM" because he 
possessed 'aw-dam' characteristics - that being of a ruddy or rosy 
complexion coming from the blood (hemoglobin) showing through 
his non-pigmented skin. This is what ADAM meant.  People of a 
very fair complexion often appear as though they are reddish or 
sunburnt since the hemoglobin readily shows through their skin.  
This was the case with Adam and Eve.
     It is argued that other racial types get rosy cheeked as well and 
"blush".  Two facts that they can't argue with is that other races just 
don't show "blood in the face" as pronounced as the white race can 
and secondly one never asks if these other races "who blush" have 
any white mixed into their past generations.  Regardless, the ability 
to "blush, turn rosy" is an *outstanding feature* of the fair skinned 
white race.  The word "ADAM" was a descriptive term to describe 
this outstanding feature of Adam & Eve over the other races.
     That Adam and Eve were of the white race with this fair, ruddy or 
rosy complexion is verified in the Bible by the descriptions of their 
descendants.  King David, who was one of Adam's direct 
descendants, was described as being "ruddy, and of fair 
countenance." (I Samuel 16:12 and 17:42)  David's daughter Tamar 
was "fair" (2 Samuel 13:1).  Sarah and Rebekah, who were both 
descendant from Adam, were both described as being "very fair" 
(Genesis 12:11,14; Gen. 24:16; Gen. 26:7).  The daughters of Job, 
one of the Adamic patriarchs, were known as the fairest women "in 
all the land" (Job 42:15).  Solomon was described as being "white 
and ruddy" (Song of Solomon 5:10).  The Nazarites (consecrated 
persons) of Judah were "whiter than milk" and "more ruddy in 
body than rubies" (Lamentations 4:7).
-----------
2.  Were they of the white 'race' or are they the mother and father of 
all the "races"? 
      Where does the idea come from that believes Adam and Eve were 
the only (first) two people on God's created earth?  Both Creationists 
and Evolutionists agree with this false assumption.   Both positions are
wrong, but their adherents stubbornly cling to this concept as the only 
possible explanation when the truth lies elsewhere.  The hypocrisy of 
the creationist's rejection of evolution should be self evident when they
claim that all men have sprung from a single pair (Adam and Eve).   
      The "common origin" concept is needed in order to promote the 
real doctrine that is desired --the doctrine of "equality of the races."  
Without a common origin, all "equalitarian" arguments disintegrate.
The Bible does not support the "common origin" concept.  God's
creation reveals the opposite.
      When we look up at the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, we see 
Adam, supposedly the first man, unquestionably depicted as a 
handsome white man.  When we look at the various religious tracts 
on "creationism," we see Adam and Eve portrayed as the most 
perfect and attractive representatives of the white European race.  Yet 
these same religious denominations, such as Jehovah's Witness, 
also state that:  "All races descended from the first man and 
woman."  ('Did Man Get Here by Evolution or by Creation,'  
Published by Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York 
(1967) p. 113.)
      Certainly if Michelangelo had painted Adam as being a Pygmy 
or carved the marble statue of David into a Bushman type, he would 
have been excommunicated.  It would appear that the only way 
White Christians will accept a unity of races doctrine is if Adam and 
Eve are attractive white people -- yet at the same time they want all 
racial types being their descendants.  Strange inconsistency or the 
Law of Truth speaking to their hearts? 
      Bible chronologists, and those who believe in creationism, place 
Adam's creation around 4004 B.C.   There is no evidence in the 
Scriptures that indicates Adam was the first man and the progenitor 
of all races or types of man.  However, there is ample evidence that 
proves many other people were all ready in existence by the time 
Adam was created.  
      The book of Genesis provides most of this evidence.  For 
example, after Cain killed Abel he was cursed and driven out of the 
land by God.  In the fourth chapter of Genesis, Cain makes the 
statement:  "I shall be a FUGITIVE and a vagabond in the earth: it 
shall come to pass, that EVERY ONE that findeth me shall slay 
me."  If only Adam and Eve existed, then who was Cain afraid of 
that would kill him?  Who was it that he would be a fugitive from?  
It is quite clear that the "every one" which Cain was referring to 
could not be Adam and Eve.  Who was Cain referring to?  Cain was 
well aware that many people existed in the lands around them.  This 
fact is verified by God in His response to Cain in verse 15.  God 
told Cain that "whosoever" of the other people that might slay you, 
vengeance shall be on that person.  Why did God have to give Cain 
an identifying mark if the only other people that existed (Adam and 
Eve) knew Cain perfectly well?  This mark was not a signal so 
Adam and Eve could recognize Cain, but rather so that "any" of the 
other people then living could recognize Cain upon their "finding 
him."  
       If Adam and Eve were the first and only people at this time, 
then from where did Cain find a wife?  Not only was he able to find 
a wife, but there were obviously enough people to be part of the city 
built by Cain.  Cain's marriage, the birth of his son Enoch, and his 
building of a city all took place before the birth of Seth.  All these 
circumstances thus point to the existence of men independent of 
Adam.
      Adam was the "first man" only in the same sense that Christ 
was the "second man," for Adam "was the figure of Christ" (Rom. 
5:14).  The basic theme of the Bible is:  Death in Adam, Life in 
Christ.  This is the "resurrected" life that was promised to be 
RESTORED to Adam and his descendants, and thus pertains to no 
other races.  The Bible is simply not a comprehensive historical
record of the origins of any other people besides the Adamic
family.  If it was, it would have to be many volumes in length.
      The Bible is quite clear about there being many people on the 
earth at the time of the story of Adam and Eve.  The Bible does not 
support the idea that Adam and Eve gave birth to all the different races
on the earth, but rather implies that Adam and Eve were a separate
creation in the midst of other people who existed prior to them. 
Since these "other" people existed before Adam, they are called 
"pre-Adamic."    
      Adam was a special creation who was called for God's own 
purpose.  The Bible, and Genesis specifically, is not a comprehensive 
account on all of God's creation.  What is covered is just the history 
God felt relevant to include.  The Bible simply does not detail the 
creation and origin of any other people besides the Adamic family, 
though we read about these other people later in the Bible.  This 
understanding will eventually end the false arguments over the two
wrong concepts of Evolution vs. Creation.  
      We could go into many more details and examples but space will not 
permit.  Again, we recommend C. Weisman's excellent book 
"Origins of Race and Civilization" for more details. (available 
below.)
 
 
11.  How did the original white 'race' manage to keep its bloodline 
       pure during times when instances of intermarriage are known to 
       have occurred?  How can we prove the purity of our own 
       bloodline?  How do we know that we aren't all mongrels of 
       mixed-race?  What about those who are already mixed and know
       they are not "100% pure Israelite?"
-----------------------------------------------------------
     (See also Q#8)  God wrote His Law upon the hearts of His 
people Israel (Jer. 31:33, Heb. 8:10), and part of that Law is 
represented in the order He established at the beginning.  "Kind 
after Kind."  If God can raise up "sons of Abraham out of the very 
stones" or raise up a man, Adam, out of the dust of the earth (Luke 
3:8), He is certainly able to maintain a select and chosen "remnant" 
to Himself, would He not?  
     Only God knows everyone's complete genealogy.  He knows 
His own people and when He calls, they answer His voice (John 
10:27).  Many others who may be of mixed race have heard His 
Word, but God says that nothing that He has not planted shall 
endure (Matt 13:24-30).  Does this mean they will be destroyed, or 
will their faith save them?  That is God's call.  "God is the one who 
justifies" (Romans 8:33).
     Perhaps the mixed-race persons only receive their reward in this 
lifetime while suffering for the sins of their fathers.  But God's 
Word also says that He will not remember the children of the sinful 
and rebellious fathers for generations (Hos. 4:6). This is very tragic 
and magnifies the consequences of the evil committed by their 
parents.   Once again, man can't blame God for their sinful actions 
against His created Law-Order (kind-after-kind).  The sin of 
rebellion is great and horrible, and man has only himself to blame 
for the misery, pain or suffering it brings.  If anyone wants to be 
angry over this tragedy it should be directed at those who are guilty 
of perpetuating it and not at those who are saying it is against God's 
created and established law-order.
     It is equally plausible, though speculation, that those mixed-race 
children, who by faith, belief in, and surrender to Jesus the Christ, 
will be purified, by the purifying fire of the power of God, in the 
promised "perfected bodies" to be granted those who choose life 
and obediently followed Christ into His death, burial and 
resurrection (Rom. 8:11; I Cor. 15:40-44).  After all, if the 
circumcision that Christ desires (of the WHOLE flesh - Col 2:11-
14) does literally "remove" the body of the flesh and a new 
"spiritual" creature is born out of this baptism and the power of 
God, does race count in such an equation?  Who are we to say 
which is the Will of God?  One thing is certain, it is up to Him 
according to His good pleasure.  
     "For it is God who is at work in you, both to will and to work for 
His good pleasure" (Phil. 2:13).
 
 
12.  What are the consequences of the self-styled "Jews" NOT 
       being who they claim to be, i.e. Israelites?  (Also see Q #4)
----------------------------------------------------------- 
    "We Jews, who have posed as Saviors of the World, we are today 
nothing else but the world's seducers, its destroyers, its incendiaries, 
its executioners."  -Dr. Oscar Levy, "The World Significance of the 
Russian Revolution," preface (Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1920) x
    "We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain destroyers forever.  
Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands.  We will 
forever destroy because we need a world of our own."  -Maurice 
Samuels, 'You Gentiles', p. 155, Harcourt, Brace. 1924
     These confessions sound rather grim, don't they?  Have these 
two witnesses accurately predicted the fate of the world if these self-
styled "Jews" are allowed to continue unhindered in their evil 
schemes and destructive purposes?  What should the consequences 
be when their impersonation of and pretending to be God's 
"chosen" is exposed for the lie that it is?  What does the law on 
your heart (and the Law of God) say should be done with 
"destroyers," "executioners," and murderers?  
     Not only is the pretender's claim to be "Israel" a false and 
fraudulent one, but these same self-styled "Jews" are in fact the 
most dangerous enemies of true Israel and the world.  The 
impostors' claim on the title "Israel" is at the core of any issue 
regarding the self-styled "Jews" because it is the first and foremost 
LIE that every other "fact" concerning these people rests upon.  If 
the lie of the impostor's impersonation of God's "chosen people" 
crumbles then their very identity is founded on nothing but fraud 
and falsehood.  Any issue or claim they may make follows this lie, 
and can't be taken seriously or given any validity.
     Because this is the foundational lie upon which all of their other 
"facts" are established regarding "Jewish" identity and claims, this 
matter establishes the integrity of all their arguments which follow.  
Anything that is built on the shifting sands of falsehood and fraud 
cannot stand, that is why those who have built their foundation upon 
the Rock of Christ (1 Cor. 10:1-5; Isa. 28:16; Matt. 12:42, 24:27; 2 
Tim. 2:19) and His Truth (John 14:6) will stand eternal and will 
eventually fill the whole earth (Dan. 2:35, Isaiah 9:7.)
     With the above (Q#4), we can conclude that the Talmudists (self-
styled "Jews") have no relation to the physical Israelites, except by 
religion which they adopted and perverted to their own ends.  This 
invalidates their arguments and claims for the land in Palestine, 
since they were never a people from that area.  It makes them out to 
be representing themselves as something they are not, which makes 
them impostors who are lying about their identity.  If they lie about 
something so fundamental as their identity, how can anything else 
they say be taken seriously?  "Who is the liar, except he who denies 
that Jesus is the Christ?" (I John 2:22.)
     These self-styled "Jews" don't take too kindly to being exposed 
and are full of all sorts of hate, sarcasm and vindictive demonization 
for those who would bring these facts into the light of day.  They 
rarely have the honesty in them to admit the facts and repent from 
their political and religious agenda.  They will hardly ever admit any 
error and do not attempt to seriously refute the accusations because 
they have no desire to repent nor have they an answer for the Truth.  
They would rather indulge in ridicule, name-calling and libel, or try
to divert the discussion away from the more condemning facts.  
"He who corrects a scoffer gets dishonor for himself, and he who 
reproves a wicked man gets insults for himself" (Proverbs 9:7).
     They have no defense, so they have no choice but to indulge in 
these fruitless activities or else admit their guilt.  Through their 
unashamed use of their "Chutzpah" they wail non-stop for 
unearned sympathy like a whining two-year-old who needs a 
spanking (Prov. 22:15).  Because people can only take so much of
this, it is only a matter of time, give them enough rope to expose 
themselves and the rest is history...  The Truth WILL out! 
     Some have weakly given in to these name-calling venom 
spewers.  Very few are tolerant enough to put up with this childish 
behavior and speak the truth regardless.  The "Jews" have 
absolutely no shame in their use of the "Jewish Persecution 
Complex" (tm) and few are those who give them what they 
truly need (i.e. Prov. 22:15).
     According to Leo Rosten's "Joy's of Yiddish" (1968), the word 
"Chutzpah" is from the Hebrew and means insolence, audacity, gall, 
effrontery:  "A 'Chutzpahnik' may be defined as the man who 
shouts 'Help!' 'Help!' while beating you up."  This is a perfect 
definition of Jewish expression.  This has been a most effective 
weapon against the faithless and fearful unbelievers who are 
separated from their God, Christ Jesus.  "If God be for us, who can 
stand against us?" (Romans 8:31-39.)
     As for the "Jewish Persecution Complex" (tm), it was observed 
and first identified in print by the Jewish author, Howard F. Stein, 
writing in 'The Journal of Psychohistory' (Fall, 1978) on "Judaism 
and the Group-Fantasy of Martyrdom".  In a follow-up on this 
article he wrote the following for 'The Journal of Historical Review' 
(Winter, 1980,):
     "For the Jews, the term "Holocaust" does not simply denote a 
single catastrophic era in history, but is a grim metaphor for the 
meaning of Jewish history.  The word "Holocaust" lies at the heart 
of the Jewish experience of time itself.  One is either anxiously 
awaiting persecution, experiencing persecution, recovering from it, 
or living in a period that is a temporary reprieve from it."  -The 
Holocaust and the Myth of the Past History.
     The oft-quoted Yiddish phrase, It's "tough to be a Jew" ("schwer 
tsoo zine a Yid") perfectly illustrates the Jewish Persecution 
Complex (tm).  This sounds like a very sad way to live, but their 
pride keeps them from surrendering to Christ and acknowledging 
Him as Lord, Messiah and Sovereign God.  Who knows, they may 
be spared this self-imposed terror if they were not so unwilling to 
give up and expose the evil of the Talmudic religion and way of life 
for the damnable thing that it is in the hope that they may find grace 
from Jesus the Christ and only true God.  "God is the one who 
justifies" (Romans 8:33).
     More and more honest inquirers, who see through this insulting 
and distasteful behavior, are finding their belief in the infallible 
"Jew" crumbling.  These truth seekers see these people as our Lord 
Jesus the Christ saw them: "a synagogue of Satan" (Rev. 2:9, 3:9) - 
liars, pretenders, persecutors, murderers, destroyers and benefactors 
of ill-gotten gains.  It is amazing that such a people can exist, but 
these impostors who call themselves "Jews" are their own worst 
enemy because the more people they defraud, insult and enslave the 
more people will eventually awaken to the "Jews" true nature and 
identity. 
     George Washington (1732-1799), our first president in America 
recognized the self-styled "Jews" for what they were: "The Jews 
work more effectively against us than the enemy's armies.  They are 
a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties and the great cause 
we are engaged in.  It is much to be lamented that each State, long 
ago has not hunted them down as pests to society and the greatest 
enemies we have to the happiness of America"  (Maxims of George 
Washington, by A.A. Appleton and Co, pp. 125,126.)
 
 
13.   Conclusion - LET THE BLIND SEE!
----------------------------------------------------------- 
     Isaiah prophesied of a time in IsraelUs future when the blind 
would see:
     "Then the eyes of those who see will not be blinded, and the ears 
of those who hear will listen. And the mind of the hasty will discern 
the truth.I" (Isaiah 32:3,4)
      In spite of the confusion in this present day and age, you must 
decide upon the action you will take regarding this information on 
Israel's Identity.  It is my prayer that you will be honest enough to 
seek out the true facts of the matter and accept the responsibility that 
is incumbent upon you. 
      You must decide who you are going to believe:
*  The Zionist "Jews" who lie for their own political gain and profit 
     as they falsely claim to be Israelites, the Chosen People of God, 
     but who refuse to acknowledge the facts to the contrary.  
*  Your pastors who falsely declare that the "Jews" are "God's 
     Chosen People" without any proof whatsoever to substantiate 
     their claim.  
*  "Jews" who truthfully admit, to their own kind and occasionally 
     to those outside of "Jewry," (as we have seen in the above 
     Q&A's) what Jewish and non-Jewish historians have verified; 
     that the Jews of today have no historical or racial lineage to the
     sons of Jacob/Israel. 
*  The Almighty God of the Bible when He warned us of "the 
    blasphemy by those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a 
     synagogue of Satan." (Rev. 2:9, 3:9) and "Who is the liar, except
     he who denies that Jesus is the Christ?" (I John 2:22.)
 
     The Bible warns us, and the "Jews" themselves confess that 
these Khazar "Jews" are impostors.  Consequently, we no longer 
have any excuse for perpetrating the LIE that the modern-day self-
styled "Jews" are Israelites, the Chosen People of God.
 
     Notwithstanding the great perils which threaten it, our civilization 
will not perish; but rather it is in the hands of God and His true 
Christian Israel peopleI It is up to them whether during the next 
fifteen or twenty years we will see the hastening or retardation of the 
coming of ChristUs kingdom in the world by tens, hundreds, and/or 
perhaps thousands, of years. 
     It does not take a genius to see that the white Christian nations 
and their people are not what they once were: that their grandeur and 
greatness are declining.  Why has it happened? Could it be because 
Israel lost her identity and her sense of obligation to her God?:
 
    "For what great nation is there that has a god so near to it as is 
YHWH our God whenever we call on Him?  Or what great nation is 
there that has statutes and judgments as righteous as this whole law 
which I am setting before you today?  Only give heed to yourself 
and keep your soul diligently, lest you forget the things which your 
eyes have seen, and lest they depart from your heart all the days of 
your life; but make them known to your sons and your grandsons." 
(Deuteronomy 4:7P9)
 
       This description will only be said again of Israel when she 
awakens to her identity and returns to her God and His laws!
       May we who have been graciously granted a deeper 
understanding of GodUs Word, and who have been privileged to see 
and hear a higher calling in Jesus(Yhshua) the Christ, prove 
ourselves worthy and true to this calling. Let us awaken to the 
tremendous impact which can be made on our generation and the 
generations to come with the knowledge of IsraelUs true identity.  
 
	LISTEN to me, you who pursue righteousness,
	 	  Who seek YHWH (the LORD):
	 	  Look to the rock from which you were hewn,
		  And to the quarry from which you were dug.
		  Look to Abraham your father,
		  And to Sarah who gave birth to you in pain.
					(Isaiah 51:1,2)
 
	OH THAT My people would listen to Me,
	  That Israel would walk in My ways!
	  I would quickly subdue their enemies,
	  And turn My hand against their adversaries.
					(Psalm 81:13,14)
 
     God had, and continues to have, a plan for His Covenant People 
Israel P the Celtic, Anglo-Saxon, Scandinavian, Germanic, and 
kindred (white) peoples. May YHWH (the LORD God of Israel) be 
magnified through YHSHUA (Jesus) THE CHRIST!
     The Creation groans for the revealing of the Sons of God!  
ISRAEL AWAKEN FROM YOUR SLUMBER!
---------------------------------------------------
 
Acknowledgments:
Our heavenly Father, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel 
for His Son, Christ Jesus who makes our redemption possible.
____________________________________
 
For further study, we recommend the following books available 
through Scriptures For America, PO Box 766-c, LaPorte, CO 80535.
----------------
*  God's Covenant People: Yesterday, Today and Forever by Ted R. 
Weiland -- THE resource book for the Israel-Identity Christian 
message.  This book proves that God continues to have a plan for 
the physical Israelites under the New Covenant dispensation.  It 
exposes the impostors and establishes who Israel *is* today from 
the Scriptures, archaeology, and history, and discloses why this is of 
such significance to us.  A hard bound book, 14 chapters, in excess 
of 700 quotes with footnotes, over 30 early American and European 
testimonies, and more than 40 Biblical, archaeological, and historical 
proofs of Israel's modern-day identity.  460 pages.  $23.00 
postpaid.
 
*  The Greatest Love Story Never Told by Pastor Pete Peters -- A 
novel introduction to the Israel-Identity message that tells the story 
of the Great I-Am of the Bible as the husband, Abraham as the 
father of the Bride, Israel as the unfaithful wife and the children of 
Israel as the cast of millions.  A love story involving love, romance, 
intrigue, divorce, conspiracy and murder.  A Bible story that will 
bring you a deeper appreciation for the love of God and how love 
truly overcomes all.  An entertaining, yet serious, study into the 
Israel-Identity truth.  $5.00
 
*  Love: The Greatest Commandment (6 Part audio album), by 
Pastor Pete Peters.  These tapes show how important it is to 
understand what love is and is not.  We know God's ways are not 
ours, but do we know our ways are not His?  What is love?  Has 
love been perverted and if so how and why?  How do we increase in 
love?  The Bible has clear step by step instructions on how to love 
God's way.  What can steal our love?  It is time to love the King 
with all our hearts, minds, souls and strength.   $24.00
 
*  Facts are Facts by Benjamin H. Freedman -- A reproduction of 
Dr. Freedman's letter addressed to Dr. David Goldstein, LL.D. of 
Boston, Massachusetts, in which Dr. Freedman demonstrates the 
Khazarian ancestry of the majority of today's Jews.  This authority 
provides proof that these Khazars are not descendants of Abraham, 
Isaac, and Jacob and consequently have no lawful claim to the land 
of Palestine.  $3.00
 
*  Missing Links Discovered in Assyrian Tablets by Archaeologist 
Raymond Capt --  Mr. Capt verifies the Identity of Israel from 
archaeological evidence.  It is specifically a study of recently 
discovered Assyrian tablets that reveal the fate of the "Lost" Tribes 
of Israel.  256 pages, $10.00
 
*  The International Jew - The World's Foremost Problem by 
Henry Ford Sr. -- Abridged version from the original printed in the 
periodical 'The Dearborn Independent' published by the Ford Motor 
Company.  This book is an expose' of Judaism and its powerful 
influence.  As revealing today as the day in which it was written.  
231 pages.  $6.00
 
*  The Thirteenth Tribe by Arthur Koestler --  Renowned Jewish 
author, Arthur Koestler, fully documents that over 90% of today's 
"Jews" are not descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, but rather 
they are descendants of the fierce Turkish, Mongolian Khazar tribes 
of the Southern Steppes of Russia.  These tribes adopted the 
religion of Judaism and thus became known as "Jews" not because 
of race but because of religion.  255 pages.  $6.00
 
*  Origins of Race and Civilization by Charles Weisman -- an 
expose' on the false Christian doctrines and distorted historical and 
scientific teachings on the origins of races and civilizations.  176 
pages, 83 Illustrations, 204 Footnotes, references, Bibliography, 6 
chapters.  Finally the truth about YOUR origins and destiny!  No 
other book like it.  Only $9.00
 
*  The Life of an American Jew in Racist, Marxist Israel by Jack 
Bernstein -- Mr. Bernstein relates his story of returning to the land 
of Israel after the 1967 Six-Day War and discovering the truth 
regarding the Ashkenazic and Sephardic Jews, who they are and 
who they are not.  48 pages.  $3.00
 
*  Who is Esau-Edom? by Charles Weisman -- Mr Weisman 
documents how Edomite blood runs through the veins of most 
"Jewish" people today.  A book which expounds upon the age-old 
battle between Esau-Edom and Jacob-Israel.  132 pages.  $8.00
 
*  Who Rules America -- This document will provide you with the 
documentation that can be reproduced in most public libraries on 
who controls today's media outlets.  $1.00
 
*  America the Conquered by Pastor Pete Peters -- This book 
provides an understanding of how America was conquered and the 
manner of her conquest.  It describes how a people can be 
conquered unaware and the motives behind the conquerors.  
Discover how it happened and what we must do.  220 pages $8.00
 
* Music:  Songs For His People by Michael Carter -- A variety of 
music from the Israel-Identity Christian perspective.  Hail the Law, 
Only To God Do We Bend Our Knee, Elie We're Sorry, The 
Mighty Hand of God and more.  Inspirational, fun and motivational.  
$8.00
_____________________________
Other Highly Recommended Sources:
 
*  The Jubilee Newspaper, P.O. Box 310, Midpines, California 
95345.  Ph:  (209) 742-NEWS. --Newspaper of news, reviews and 
views from the Patriotic Christian perspective.  $2.50 for a sample 
copy.
*  Truth for the Times -- Television Program hosted by Pastor Pete 
Peters, aired three times a week by Satellite on Galaxy 3, 
Transponder 11 as well as numerous Cable Television companies.  
(Check your local Cable TV guide).
*  NewsLight -- News Radio hosted by Paul Hall, Chris Temple 
and Louis Beam -- Every Saturday evening on 11.950 short-wave 6-
7 p.m. Pacific Time.
*  Music - Watch Out For Martial Law by Carl Klang -- inspired 
by this nation's modern-day life-and-death struggles for freedom.  
Federal Reserve Isn't Federal At All, Why the Banksters Keep Us 
Dumb, Hang-um High, Blinded By the Lies, Leave Our Guns Alone 
and more!  Carl Klang, PO Box 217, Colton, OR 97017 ($10.00 
postpaid)
__________________________________
 
WHEN THE SAXON LEARNS TO LOVE
 by - S. Grace
 
To a Candle, tall and white, Comes a wonder (from above):
A flame, like a guiding Light, When the Saxon learns to love.
And a world, once grim and dark, Sunk in clouds of sullen fear,
Rejoices to see the spark in his eyes, so bright and clear!
Like a lion, poised to leap, Or a sweetly-singing dove
Who watches (while others sleep) from a tower lit by love;
Like the sun, he shares a fate (Once a shadowed world revolves)
To shine, until gloomy hate, Like a morning mist, dissolves;
And the rule of Christ on earth (which the prophets much spoke of)
Arrives, like a blessed birth -- When the Saxon learns to love,
 
When the Saxon BURNS with love!

-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|     Access this ftp site for many interesting files:      Rick Savage     | 
|  Anonymous FTP server:  ftp.netcom.com  -  cd /pub/SFA    PO Box 5251     |
|       Gov't, history, law, Bible, socialissues          Denver, CO 80217  |


Article 18174 of alt.discrimination:
Xref: oneb alt.activism:49746 alt.discrimination:18174 alt.politics.correct:17494
Newsgroups: alt.activism,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.correct
Path: oneb!hakatac!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!vanbc.wimsey.com!scipio.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!lll-winken.llnl.gov!enews.sgi.com!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Re: Racial Bill of Rights Proposal
Message-ID: 
Followup-To: alt.activism,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.correct
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References:  <38l009$fdk@nntp.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 1994 19:14:18 GMT
Lines: 20

Joseph G. Adams (jgadams@leland.Stanford.EDU) wrote:

: Rick Savage  wrote:

: >    Sorry about having to re-post this, but the previous article by 
: >the same name had a big editing problem that is now fixed in this new 
: >version:

: [very long article deleted in the interest of brevity and c*mm*n s*ns*]

: Umm, you didn't fix it.  It's STILL quasi-Nazi bullshit.


    Is this your best neo-commie equalitarian opinion?

-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|     Access this ftp site for many interesting files:      Rick Savage     | 
|  Anonymous FTP server:  ftp.netcom.com  -  cd /pub/SFA    PO Box 5251     |
|       Gov't, history, law, Bible, socialissues          Denver, CO 80217  |


Article 10029 of alt.skinheads:
Xref: oneb alt.skinheads:10029 alt.config:37843
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads,alt.config
Path: oneb!hakatac!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!scipio.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!lll-winken.llnl.gov!enews.sgi.com!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Re: **PROPOSAL** alt.white-power
Message-ID: 
Followup-To: alt.skinheads,alt.config
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References:  <38f2o3$11g@thor.inlink.com> 
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 1994 16:48:18 GMT
Lines: 42

Jason Smith (al998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) wrote:

: In a previous article, tlathrop@netcom.com (Tom Lathrop) says:
: >However I think a much better name would be alt.nationalism.white.
: >
: >The term "white power" suggests to many people the idea that whites
: >should dominate non-whites.  However many white nationalists have other
: >ideas, and would either like to separate peacefully, or else change the
: >social contract so that whites and non-whites can live together without
: >the group existence of whites being threatened.  (I know this must
: >sound pretty silly to a lot of people, but some of us really do care
: >about such things).  So the name alt.nationalism.white is more
: >descriptive and inclusive than alt.white-power, and also strikes me as
: >being a little bit less likely to incite flame wars (although I must
: >admit probably not much less likely).

: 	Seems like you beat me to it.  I was going to propose much the
: same thing.  alt.white-power sounds much too supremacist for some of the
: more moderate nationalist factions.  I second this motion.

     I also support the "alt.nationalism.wht" over alt.white-power.  I 
don't think we need to start an alt.*-power heirarchy.  I could support 
an alt.nationalism.* heirarchy though.  You know as soon as the 
"alt.nationalism.wht" hits we will have an alt.nationalism.blk, etc.  
     All nationalist factions whether they be white, black or whatever 
need to get over their desire for "empowerment" for it's own sake but 
build power that is focused on their end goals of self-determination and 
seperation. 
     These goals have a better chance of being furthered if they are 
focused on nationalism rather than race.  Nationalism encompases race but 
is not limited to it.  Nationalism is favorable to the preservation of 
all races through seperation and a true respect and love for diversity.  
     Supremacist factions are merely dialectical tools that benefit the 
agents of cultural destruction by giving them the necessary "bad guys" to 
create the problems of inter-cultural conflict which they can "solve" by the
elimination of all diversity and culture into a one-world sameness.
     alt.white.power?  No.  alt.nationalism.*?  Yes.
-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|     Access this ftp site for many interesting files:      Rick Savage     | 
|  Anonymous FTP server:  ftp.netcom.com  -  cd /pub/SFA    PO Box 5251     |
|       Gov't, history, law, Bible, socialissues          Denver, CO 80217  |


Article 18253 of alt.revisionism:
Xref: oneb alt.politics.nationalism.white:1 alt.revisionism:18253 alt.skinheads:10058
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Path: oneb!hakatac!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!zip.eecs.umich.edu!caen!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Re: Picking at Scabs
Message-ID: 
Followup-To: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References:  
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 1994 20:16:54 GMT
Lines: 58

Joseph Boyle (boyle@netcom.com) wrote:
: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage) writes:

: >     A recurring theme in Instauration is the judaization of America ...

: >     More important are Jewish influences that are not just "alien" 
: >to us, but infect and transform us so completely we start to exhibit 
: >Jewish behavior.  ...

: >Melville's Captain Ahab -- a sorely wounded Gentile who suffered 
: >from the "Never Forget" syndrome -- was named after a Hebrew 
: >king.)  ...

: Get a clue, Rick. Ahab's Hebrew name was typical for a New England founded
: by Puritans who admired the Jews, favored the Old Testament, and put
: Hebrew lettering on Yale's shield. America (the northern part, anyway has
: been "Judaizing" from the start. It's not for nothing that we refer to the
: national ethic as "Judeo-Christian". 

     Judeo-Christian is an oxymoron.  The two are black and white, oil 
and water, fire and ice to each other.  Opposites that cannot co-exist.  
Once cancels out the other. 

: >there's mores than enough heartache to go around.  Most cultures 
: >provide a specified period of mourning, but in semitized America, 
: >we can never forget.  (We are, however, constantly advised to 
: >deep-six the Old South and the Stars and Bars, even though "Old 
: >times there are not forgotten.")  Too many of us have become 

: Thanks for refuting your own thesis before I could, Rick. If all
: complaining about things past can be traced to Jews, I can't wait to hear 
: your history of the Lost Cause. After all, it was true that the
: Confederacy had a Jewish vice-president. Maybe the whole thing was 
: another Jewish plot?

      This isn't *my* thesis, though I wouldn't have posted it if I 
didn't find some agreement with it.  Leave it to someone like yourself to 
miss the point and conclusions of the article to nitpick at irrelevances.

: >stopped.  Christianity, when transplanted to pagan cultures, 
: >frequently blends with the local beliefs.  Judaism and those who 
: >espouse it are unassimilable.

: At the end of a long rant complaining that Jews are affecting our "local 
: beliefs", you come out with this?

   I fail to see your point in this question of bewilderment.  Care to 
explain?  I would assume, by using the authors ethnic and cultural 
persuation he was refering to white "pagan" cultures.  In this case his 
statement is completely true about Christianity and how easy it has been 
adopted by the many white people who heard Christ's message.  That shouldn't 
be surprising since Christ came only to Israel and said that His people 
shall hear his voice.  (Matt. 15:24, John 8:47)
-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|     Access this ftp site for many interesting files:      Rick Savage     | 
|  Anonymous FTP server:  ftp.netcom.com  -  cd /pub/SFA    PO Box 5251     |
|       Gov't, history, law, Bible, socialissues          Denver, CO 80217  |


Article 18256 of alt.revisionism:
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Path: oneb!hakatac!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!torn!howland.reston.ans.net!news.moneng.mei.com!uwm.edu!lll-winken.llnl.gov!enews.sgi.com!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: The lie before all lies
Message-ID: 
Keywords: Identity,Israelites,Jews,revisionism
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 1994 03:52:07 GMT
Lines: 34

    All discussions concerning the "Jews" as identified by their 
religion, Judaism, rests upon the foundation of their claim to be "God's 
Chosen people" (i.e. the people of the "Book", the "Jews" of the Bible).  
    This fraud is the easiest thing in the world to expose as wishful 
thinking as best.  They are discredited as frauds from the outset until 
they denounce any claims to be "Israelites" or "Jews" of the Bible and 
acknowledge their true identity as imposters who have inherited the 
identity as "Jews" by their condemned religion alone and not blood.
    With this precedent of outright fraud or blind innocent belief in 
something so fundamental as their historical identity we can understand 
the "Jewish" tenacity in maintaining their "never-forget" vendetta.  
Their house of lies rests on a lie which makes them vulnerable to the 
smallest truth.  The charge of so-called "anti-semitism" had to become a 
weapon of self-defense against the indignation of those who discover one 
of these small truths about the "Jewish" house of lies from exploding 
into the real thing.  
    To live in constant paranoia must take it's toll on these people.  
This fear of defending their indefensable position soon manifests 
in constant accusations against those who can't ignore obvious plain truth. 
They must become masters of subtlety and innuendo to practice their 
"final solution" to all "deniers" who refuse to accept their simple
assertions without question.  Character assisination has become a refined 
art because of their pioneering and persistent efforts.   Any who 
chose to learn it should study these people who call themselves "Jews."   

    In the following message is the "Identity.faq."  It is a simple 
introduction to the true Identity of "God's Chosen People", the 
Israelites.  

-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|     Access this ftp site for many interesting files:      Rick Savage     | 
|  Anonymous FTP server:  ftp.netcom.com  -  cd /pub/SFA    PO Box 5251     |
|       Gov't, history, law, Bible, socialissues          Denver, CO 80217  |


Article 18336 of alt.revisionism:
Xref: oneb alt.politics.nationalism.white:5 alt.revisionism:18336 alt.skinheads:10105
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads
Path: oneb!hakatac!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!scipio.cyberstore.ca!vanbc.wimsey.com!news.bc.net!news.mic.ucla.edu!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!casaba.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!noc.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!solaris.cc.vt.edu!news.duke.edu!godot.cc.duq.edu!newsfeed.pitt.edu!uunet!olivea!news.hal.COM!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!rsavage
From: rsavage@netcom.com (Rick Savage)
Subject: Picking at Scabs
Message-ID: 
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 1994 01:42:43 GMT
Lines: 281

From anonymous FTP site:    ftp.netcom.com /pub/SFA
-----------------------------------------
 
PICKING AT SCABS
   -- Our Judeo-Fiction Heritage
        "If a man cannot forget, he will never amount to much" 
             --Soren Kierkegaard
 
     A recurring theme in Instauration is the judaization of America 
or words to that effect.  I suspect that most of us have some pretty 
vivid notions of what that means.  We could point to Jewish 
control of the media and finance (and degradation of same), Israeli 
influence on foreign policy, Holocaust sanctification, the 
predictable yammering of the ACLU and the ADL and Clinton's 
cabinet appointments and Supreme Court nominees.  
     More important are Jewish influences that are not just "alien" 
to us, but infect and transform us so completely we start to exhibit 
Jewish behavior.  Here we could mention hucksterism and fast 
bucksterism, the mounting rudeness and abrasiveness of daily life, 
an intolerable increase in conspicuous consumption while taste 
and restraint are nose-diving, the collapse of ethics, the 
proliferation of lawsuits and the over-emphasis on groins and 
loins in popular culture.  Jews may have blazed the trails, but all 
too many of us have followed them, almost oblivious to the fact 
that the aforementioned trails are anathema to an advanced 
civilization.
     Another Jewish trait that permeates American society is the 
"Never Forget Syndrome."  I like to call it picking at scabs.
     There's a reason why your mother told you to leave your scabs 
alone.  First of all, it isn't polite to pick, your scabs in public.  
More importantly, if you leave the scabs alone, they eventually fall 
off.  In time, you'll never know a scab used to be there.  (Note that 
Melville's Captain Ahab -- a sorely wounded Gentile who suffered 
from the "Never Forget" syndrome -- was named after a Hebrew 
king.)  But no matter how big the scab, if you pick at it, it will 
never heal -- worse yet, it may become infected.  By choosing to 
pick scabs, the Chosen render themselves as pustulous as they are 
pushy.  And the contagion has spread to the Majority.
     From Freud to the latest Jewish headshrinker on the nonfiction 
bestseller list, Jews have achieved fame and fortune by convincing 
us to pick at every scab -- real or imaginary -- long after the injury 
-- real or imaginary.
     There is a two-step process at work here.  First you convince 
'em they're sick, then you sell 'em the cure!  It's an unbeatable 
combination.
     The Holocaust survivor is an all-too-familiar figure reaching 
back 50 years or more into his memory bank and bringing out 
atrocity after atrocity.  Ah, but now the Holocaust survivor has 
company -- lots of it.  And most of it belongs to the Majority.  
The semitized bestsellers and TV talk shows allow even the most 
seemingly normal person to major in victimology.  We have 
people claiming to have witnessed hundreds of murders during 
satanic rituals, though no remains are ever found.  Alien 
abductions are a real problem, but I'm referring to Latino 
carjacking, rap and murder, not abductions of the "Beam me up, 
Jose'" variety.
     The thousand and one shocks the flesh was heir to in Hamlet's 
time have grown apace.  Today we must be up to at least a million 
and one.  But you wouldn't have a clue as to what they are if you 
stuck to the TV talk shows that specialize in victim/survivors 
picking their scabs in public:
     - They called me fatso and hurt my feelings!
     - My dad never told me he loved me!
     - My parents use racial slurs when no one else is around.
     - They said I wasn't pretty enough to make the cheerleading 
squad.
     - My mother wouldn't accept my black boyfriend.
     - My supervisor fondled my buttocks!
     And the scabs of the fathers are visited upon the sons.  Note 
how we now have not only Holocaust victims but children and 
grandchildren of Holocaust victims -- perhaps not so surprising 
considering Yahweh's wrath toward not just evildoers but their 
offspring.  In the year 2025 will we tun in holograph sets and sit 
among a solemn talk show gathering of great-grandchildren of 
Auschwitz inmates?
     Don't bet against it.  Multi-generational whining is all the rage.  
We not only have Alcoholics Anonymous but organizations for 
the spouses and teenage children of boozers.  The gays and 
lesbians not only have their own organizations, so do their parents 
and children.
     One of the sorriest trends in pop psychology is the concept of 
pain sharing.  "I feel your pain," is now the equivalent of "I'm so 
sorry."  This is the height of idiocy.  Pain is to be RELIEVED, 
not shared, just as a disease is to be cured, not spread.  Would 
you want to share someone else's HIV virus or E. coli?  Perhaps 
this trend explains why we haven't quarantined AIDS victims.  We 
want to share their pain.
     Hard to believe that we used to be a hearty people.  Ask 
yourself if you or anyone you know would even attempt to cross 
North America in a wagon train.  AT the first broken wheel, we 
would sue the wheelwright.  Indian attack?  Sue the wagonmaster 
for not protecting us.  
     Have you ever noticed how that as Gentiles age they start to 
resemble Jews?  As the body ages and loses its tone, it assumes a 
wizened, shriveled look.  Many elderly people are complainers, 
evoking good old days when they had their health, before they 
made a lifetime of mistakes of the "If I knew then what I know 
now" variety.
     Catholics will literally light a candle rather than curse the 
darkness but Jews prefer the histrionics of the wailing wall.  
Curiously, they seem to do so not for the purpose of catharsis but 
for the perverse joy of wallowing in pain.  But Jews aren't the only 
ones with a wailing wall these days.  Have you seen those TV 
news stories of Vietnam vets at their own wailing wall -- the 
Vietnam Memorial in Washington, D.C.?  Is there anything more 
pathetic than the sight of a middle-aged white man in fatigues, 
blubbering away about his war experiences of a quarter century 
ago.   (Note that relatively few blacks are videotaped visiting the 
wall -- even though it's in the heart of D.C.!)
     Now I can hear someone objecting that the Vietnam Memorial 
is just the latest in a long line of war memorials.  Not so.  A 
generation after WWII, you didn't see veterans lingering around 
memorials to their war and bawling their eyes out.  You didn't see 
the mothers of dead soldiers still grieving.  Actually, it's not so 
much that the memorials have changed.  WE have changed.  
Generations ago people got on with their lives.  Now we're too 
busy picking at scabs.
     Thanks to a student deferment and a high draft lottery number, 
I was spared the Vietnam experience, so I may not be qualified to 
pronounce judgment on lachrymose vets.  Still, it strikes me their 
response is not normal.  Here I defer to a recently deceased 
WWII veteran who once described to me the three stages of 
combat grief:
     The first time you see a buddy get killed, it's "Oh, my God!  
My best friend!  He's dead!"
     The second time, it's "Oh, geez, too bad." 
     And the third time, it's "Whew, glad it wasn't me."
     Throughout the vast charnel house of history -- of wars, 
famines, plagues, natural disasters and changing neighborhoods -- 
there's mores than enough heartache to go around.  Most cultures 
provide a specified period of mourning, but in semitized America, 
we can never forget.  (We are, however, constantly advised to 
deep-six the Old South and the Stars and Bars, even though "Old 
times there are not forgotten.")  Too many of us have become 
emotionally disabled for life.  Note the terms "incest survivor" or 
"rape survivor" as opposed to "incest victim" or "rape victim."  
Well, why wouldn't you survive?  As brutal and repulsive as these 
activities may be, they are not usually life-threatening.  But the 
term "survivor" magnifies the seriousness of the wound and the 
deadliness of the perpetrator.  Anything to maximize sympathy.
     So let's look at the Holocaust afresh.  Forget the body count 
and let the Jews assert that Six Million Jews died in concentration 
camps.  Then let us utter the time-honored words, "So what?"
     Insensitive?  Maybe so, but the next time you're in a crowd, say 
at a stadium, a shopping mall, a subway concourse at rush hour or 
a beach on a holiday weekend, take a look at all the people within 
your field of view.  Out of the thousands that you see, every one 
will feel pain at various stages of his life -- guaranteed!  And every 
one will die -- guaranteed!  Black and white, Jew and Gentile, 
homo and hetero, male and female -- every last one of them.  But 
once the dead have been buried, it's time to abandon funeral dirges 
and funeral urges.  Listen, Hymie, they've made great progress in 
tattoo removal since you were in that camp.  You could at least 
cover it up with another tattoo, say, a heart with "My Yiddische 
Momma" emblazoned on it.  Whether the body count is 6 or 
6,000,000, they've been gone for almost 50 years.  So enough of 
those bladder-buster feature films (Swindler's List is a mere 195 
minutes.  The Sorrow and the Pity (1970) ran 260 minutes.  
Shoah (1985) lasted 503 minutes).  Of course, all three movies are 
routinely given four stars by the reviewers.  Could any group of 
people on this planet render abject misery in such wall-to-wall 
detail?  What other group would even try?
     As time goes by, it becomes all too easy to stockpile 
resentments and disappointments.  Some may be profound, others 
trivial.  But they mount up relentlessly and inevitably.  You can't 
totally ignore them but you can, in the current parlance, "Get a 
life!"  It is not that unusual to find people who operate under dire 
handicaps yet still remain cheerful and productive.  On the other 
hand, the chronic complainer usually has it no worse than 
anybody else.
     All females are victims/survivors to a large degree.  They 
surpass men in rote memory and have an uncanny ability to recall 
every slight, every insult.  Men tend to have more selective 
memories.  Women bruise easier than men -- emotionally as well 
as physically.  They are too thin-skinned, literally and figuratively.  
Men, with thicker skins (and thicker skulls, I can hear the distaff 
reader adding) can withstand pain better.  But you better not say, 
"Be a man!" to a male today.  That exhortation can get you in big 
trouble in some circles.
    The white man, at least if he is of Northern European descent, 
constantly derided by those of darker hue because he is too 
restrained, too repressed, too uptight, too anal retentive.  (Thank 
you, Sigmund, what would we do without such colorfully 
descriptive phrases.)  In view of the link between light-colored 
eyes and hesitation and inhibition, Nordics are constitutionally 
able to suffer pain in silence.  This may be the cause of our 
greatest failing.  Look at how patient we are with the depredations 
of minorities.  Ironically, despite Instauration's exaltation of 
Nordics, a serious white consciousness movement will probably 
have brown-eyed foot soldiers!
     Until recently, we didn't burden others with our tales of woe.  
The "stiff upper lip" used to denote courage.  Now the trembling 
lower lip is more common, as the worst examples of human 
wreckage are congratulated for their "courage" when they appear 
on talk shows and rip apart their old wounds on national 
television.  "Well," gushes the talk show host, "it certainly took 
COURAGE for you to come on our show and tell us how you 
were anally raped by inmates for twenty years at Leavenworth."
     The talk show circuit is heavily semitized, but the damage to 
Majority sensibilities doesn't stop with this kind of 
"entertainment."  Do you think we would have been treated to so 
many instant replays of Rodney King getting his comeuppance if 
the TV networks weren't run by the Chosen?  Would the rabble 
have responded so rabidly if the images in that famous blow-by-
blow videotape hadn't been seared into their collective 
consciousness?  If Rodney King had been Shlomo Schwartz, the 
videotape would still be running.
     The Jew is an emotional hypochondriac.  As he exerts more 
and more influence over our popular culture, the unique character 
of his tribe becomes more and more evident.  Originally, Woody 
Allen was going to call "Annie Hall" by another name:  
"Anhedonia."  This is a clinical term for an affliction in which an 
individual is unable to feel pleasure.  A born scab-picker, that 
Woody!
     Whatever their accomplishments as scientists, Jews are not 
known as outstanding naturalists.  Too bad, because they could 
learn something.  Snakes shed their skin, birds moult, trees lose 
their leaves, cells die and are replaced by more dead skin.  This is 
renewal.  This is normal.  This is life.
     Note that blisters eventually give way to calluses if friction 
continues.  This is the normal course of events.  However, this 
does not mean that the subject must become callous.  The callus is 
designed to protect the blister from further injury.  The callous 
individual, despite the linguistic similarity, is generally someone 
who INFLICTS pain in others.  His best defense is offensive 
behavior. 
     Perhaps now we can see the unbridgeable chasm between 
Christianity and Judaism.  Christianity is life.  Judaism is death.  
We can argue forever about whether Christ was a Jew.  Either 
way, his teachings were aimed at Jews -- the people who needed it 
most.  "Look, you Jews, life doesn't have to be like this.  There's 
another way."  Perhaps this is the most compelling reason to 
believe that Christ was not a Jew.  If he had been, he would have 
picked at those Crucifixion wounds and they never would have 
healed.
     There is a long tradition of healing in Christianity and 
paganism.  I'm no Biblical scholar, but from what I remember in 
my readings, healing didn't play a big part in the Old Testament.  
Gnashing of teeth, rending of garments, beating of breasts, 
lamentations, and imprecations were common behavior patterns.  
Of course, in the New Testament, the Jews had a lot to complain 
about, since they were living under Roman occupation.  But since 
they weren't buying Christ's message, his apostles took it to the 
Gentiles.  Lazarus was literally brought back from the dead; the 
"live" Jews weren't so lucky.  The scales had to fall from Saul's 
eyes before he saw the light.  Then came the Diaspora, when Jews 
packed their bags and picked their scabs -- and they still haven't 
stopped.  Christianity, when transplanted to pagan cultures, 
frequently blends with the local beliefs.  Judaism and those who 
espouse it are unassimilable.
     The normal organism tries to avoid bodily distress.  Picking at 
scabs prolongs bodily distress.  It is an unnatural attempt to 
reverse the out-with-the-old, in-with-the-new process.  Worse, it 
increases the possibility of infection.  And infection, if not treated 
or held in check by a strong immune system, will eventually kill 
the organism.
     You have been warned.
 
- Judson Hammond, INSTAURATION, September 1994
  Published by Howard Allen Enterprises, Inc.
  Box 76, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920
  Annual Subscription:
    $35 (third class)
    $43 (First class)
    $43 Canada
    $47 foreign (surface)
    $66 foreign (air)
  Single copy price $4, postpaid.
  Make checks payable to Howard Allen.
  Florida residents, please add %6 sales tax
 
-----------------------------------------
Get the "Identity.faq" and many other files by
anonymous FTP from:    ftp.netcom.com /pub/SFA
-----------------------------------------

-- 
 _____________________Rick Savage ______________________
|     Access this ftp site for many interesting files:      Rick Savage     | 
|  Anonymous FTP server:  ftp.netcom.com  -  cd /pub/SFA    PO Box 5251     |
|       Gov't, history, law, Bible, socialissues          Denver, CO 80217  |



Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor

© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012

This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and to combat hatred. Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.

As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.