From cwporter@tornado.be Sat Jan 10 21:17:21 EST 1998
Article: 159226 of alt.revisionism
From: "CARLOS W. PORTER" 
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: he gassed them, he gassed them not
Date: 11 Jan 1998 01:54:20 GMT
Organization: Tornado News Processing System
Lines: 153
Message-ID: <01bd1e25$354ffe20$155795c2@default>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.149.87.21
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.cmc.net!syix.com!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!atl-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.planetc.com!tornix.tornado.be!not-for-mail
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.revisionism:159226

 
 
I don't suppose it occurs to people that the Jews are placing the world
upon the horns of a dilemma.
 
Let's be logical. Either Hitler gassed the Jews, or he didn't. Let' say he
did.
 
HE GASSED THEM
 
The Jews say the Germans killed 2/3 of the Jews in Europe. If that is true,
it means that American intervention in Europe -- which cost us a trillion
dollars and 250,000 lives -- saved 1/3 of the Jews in Europe from certain
destruction.
 
I repeat: If Hitler gassed 2/3, then we saved 1/3. The Jews can't have it
any other way.
 
That being the case, do we get any gratitude? Of course not. Instead, all
of the accusations that used to be made against the Germans are now made
against the White Race as a whole.
 
The Pope is guilty for the Holocaust (or so the Jews say). Christianity is
guilty for the Holocaust (or so the Jews say). Western civilization is
guilty for the Holocaust (or so the Jews say). We are all guilty for the
Holocaust (or so the Jews say).
 
Maybe some day life will be discovered on other planets, so that we can
hear about how Martians and Venusians are guilty for the Holocaust.
 
Our guilt for the Holocaust can never be erased (or so the Jews say).
Centuries, eons, ages, may pass, but our guilt for the Holocaust will
remain (or so the Jews say). When our culture, nation, and race have become
extinct through immigration, abortion, race-mixing, the constant promotion
of homosexuality and Zero-Birth Rate as a way of life, etc. etc., our guilt
for the Holocaust will remain, unextinguished for all time (or so the Jews
say).
 
When all the industry is in China and all the Chinese are in Europe; when
car-theft, drug-pushing, and whoring are the only gainful occupations left;
when our sons have all become AIDS-infected drug addicts or drag queens;
when our daughters have all become race-mixing, guilt-obsessed field sluts,
aborting their own children and adopting Africans instead, our guilt for
the Holocaust will remain, unextinguished for all time (or so the Jews
say).
 
No country lives in the past. No country spends all its time worrying about
something that happened in a foreign country fifty years ago. Whatever
Hitler did to the Jews, it was a matter between foreigners. It's not only
something other nations had nothing to do with, it's something we put a
stop to, at considerable cost to ourselves. 
 
Hundreds of millions of people have been killed in the twentieth century
(usually because the Jews wanted it that way), but no matter; only Jews are
important. Only Jews have rights; only Jews have feelings. 
 
I have 4 children educated in Catholic schools. They know nothing about the
Christian religion. They know nothing about the Bible. They know nothing
about the Middle Ages or the Renaissance. They've never heard of Communism
or Stalin. But they know all about Auschwitz. They know all about
homosexuals, transsexuals, transvestites, condoms and AIDS, because they
learn it in school!
This is all that is left of the religion that produced thousands of martyrs
and built the cathedrals of Europe. 
 
This is the world that tens of millions of people died for. The Jews say
they want a G-d world. But what they have given us is a filth world, an
excrement world; in short, a J-w world.
 
It used to be that the Jews only wished to destroy the German. That day is
finished. Now they want to destroy us all. All law, all morals, all art,
all culture, all religion, must be perverted and destroyed to suit the
Jews. Why? Because of the Holocaust. Because a foreigner killed foreign
Jews.
 
I have faith in my children. They are good children. But I see no future
for them. They remind me of goldfish swimming in a sewer. They seem to
think it perfectly natural that their future should be blotted out for the
benefit of billions of Africans and Asians; that the world should be filled
with disease to avoid interfering with the pleasures of deviants; that
there should be no future for White children.
 
If you have 4 children and are White, people treat you like a sex-fiend,
like you can't control yourself. So many children!!! But all the other
races can have 8 or 10, and that is wonderful. We are supposed to feed
them, care for them, cure their diseases, admit them as immigrants, provide
them with a modern standard of living; we must LITERALLY prefer them over
our own children! And what is the excuse for it all? Because a foreigner
killed foreign Jews!
No matter where in the world we live, we can't write our own immigration
laws without interference from the Jews. We can't even expel illegal
immigrants without interference from the Jews, because it reminds them of
"when they were being rounded up for the Holocaust", etc. etc..
 
The cave paintings at Lescaux and Altamira are among the most beautiful
artistic creations in history, and they are 20,000 years old. Yet the race
that created them is doomed to extinction. What is our guilt? Is it some
crime we committed? No. We are being destroyed for an act of kindness. We
took pity on the Jews.
 
This means that we are doomed to become extinct as a race because of
something some foreigner did to a load of foreigners 50 years ago!
 
So what is the lesson to be learned from all this? That the Jews are
ungrateful? Of course not. Jewish ingratitude has been proverbial since
Biblical times. Every act of kindness shown to them becomes a new injustice
to be expiated through eternal atonement (and hundreds of tons of gold).
 
No. The real lesson of the Holocaust (assuming that it is a historical
fact) is that, with Jews, partial killing and pogroms DO NOT WORK. 
 
If you could kill 90% of them, it would teach the remaining 10% absolutely
NOTHING. They would NEVER understand that they had it coming to them TO ANY
EXTENT AT ALL, even 1%.
 
The lesson of the Holocaust is that partial killing of Jews does not work
-- it must be ALL or NOTHING.
 
Really, we should thank the Jews for making matters so clear to us.
 
Since killing all the Jews is impossible and should not be attempted -- but
since the Jews never seem to learn anything and since Israel is a failure
-- perhaps the Jews will be kind enough to colonize the moon to escape
anti-Semitism? Perhaps it could be paid for out of reparations collected
>from  the Palestinians. 
 
Now let's look at the other horn of the dilemma.
 
HE GASSED THEM NOT
 
Of course, the above only applies if the Holocaust is a "proven fact",
i.e., if Hitler really gassed the Jews.
 
If it's all lies -- and a filthy, disgusting, degrading pack of lies at
that -- then the situation is incomparably worse.
 
 
 
 
C.W.PORTER
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
End of text




From cwporter@tornado.be Sat Jan 10 21:17:22 EST 1998
Article: 159253 of alt.revisionism
From: "CARLOS W. PORTER" 
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: why dispute the holocaust?
Date: 11 Jan 1998 01:37:59 GMT
Organization: Tornado News Processing System
Lines: 122
Message-ID: <01bd1e22$ed654400$155795c2@default>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.149.87.21
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!newsxfer.visi.net!europa.clark.net!4.1.16.34!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!atl-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.planetc.com!tornix.tornado.be!not-for-mail
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.revisionism:159253

WHY DISPUTE THE HOLOCAUST?
By
Prof. Roger Dommergue
 
(A Jew by birth and by education)
 
A new campaign has been launched to show the fraudulent nature of the
belief that Germany under Hitler undertook a systematic programme with the
objective of a mass extermination of the Jews, especially, that 6 million
were killed in gas chambers.
There are certain explanations to be given first for the benefit of those
who are not familiar with the revisionist cause, and who will probably ask
a few questions, or only think them:
Question no. 1: if you admit that Jewish deaths in the Nazi concentration
camps amounted to several thousands, why is it so important to prove that
the figures are not millions? Does the gravity of the crime depend on the
numbers?
Answer: Why is so important for the Holocaust true believers to perpetuate
this number using millions instead of thousands, to such an extent that
Draconian punitive measures, including imprisonment, must be implemented to
suppress doubt as to the numbers?
Of course, if several thousand were deliberately killed instead of several
million, the crime would be just as repugnant!
But the subject of doubting the scale of the alleged extermination is to
cast doubt upon the entire credibility of the legend of the Holocaust
itself, since if it can be established that the exterminationists lied as
to the numbers, it can therefore furthermore be asked whether they lied
about other things as well!
Was there ever a real programme of deliberate extermination?
Or did the thousands who really died (Jews and non-Jews) die of other
causes?
And if that is the case, does the fault really lie with the Nazi
authorities?
Question no. 2:
Why is it so important to cast doubt upon the truth of the Holocaust and
make such an issue of the matter, particularly when that causes so much
offence?
Answer: Hasn't it ever occurred to you that the offence is just as great as
great to the Germans, particularly if it involves a monstrous hoax?
Why should the feelings of Germans be considered less important than the
feelings of Jews?
It is incredible that a judge should state: "If there was no extermination
of Jews under Hitler, this is equivalent to saying that all the Jewish
witnesses are liars, and you do not have the right to call them liars,
since that would disturb public order and engender racial hatred?"
Thus, lies when they are Jewish lies must be protected from examination by
the law, without regard for the racial hatred which they engender against
the Germans!
It is important to dispute the Holocaust for one single reason: IF… our
pubic life is directed by a mechanism of lies, it is vital for us to
recognize that fact, since those who lie on one matter are likely to lie to
us on many others!
WE WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO DEAL WITH ANY OF OUR CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS BEFORE
ESTABLISHING THE TRUTH IN ALL FIELDS!
In fact, for some 50 years, the public has been subjected to permanent
propaganda intended to depreciate many of the greatest national European
achievements of history. There are many reasons to believe that this
propaganda is the same as that which is responsible for the flood of lies
about the Second World War and the so-called Holocaust.
These discoveries compel us to conclude that the reasons for attempting to
suppress free discussion on the truth of the Holocaust… very far removed
>from  those who pretend that they only wish to protect the sensibility of
certain people and hit something really indisputably sinister.
THE REASONS: The history of the Holocaust has supplied the formula for
destroying the nations and races of the world, which is the principal
ambition of Zionism, with the exception of their own (see many passages
>from  the Old Testament).
The Zionist plan has this objective, it is therefore a Zionist objective to
destroy the racial identity of the peoples of the world (always with the
exception of their own), an identity which is the most vital element of an
independent nation.
Through this sort of pressure, they frighten and reduce to silence all
opposition to the Zionist power and to the progressive destruction of the
national idea! There is no doubt as to the success of this sinister tactic:
millions of "Gentiles" have been terrified to express patriotic or racial
sentiments by fear of stigmatization (by their own justices systems, at
that!!!) as the advocates of a new Holocaust.
The tortuous logic which governs us today insists that if one wishes to
protect one's nation or race (unless one is a Jew!!!) one must necessarily
aim at the hatred and extermination of others!
In addition to the absurdity of such an idea, and the enormous confession
which it contains, perhaps relating to a tragic past, is, alas, that it is
a reality that the reasoning powers of the "Gentiles" has been largely
atrophied by the impact of Holocaust propaganda.
This explains the catastrophic acquiescence of so many Europeans in the
loss of sovereignty of their homelands and the invasion of their countries
by non-white immigration.
It is therefore URGENT, and in the present framework in which ALL RACISM IS
CONDEMNED, to publicly and openly examine THE RACIST JEWISH MYTH OF THE
HOLOCAUST, in such a way that we may then capable of seeing and thinking
clearly on these problems which affect our own national and racial future,
without being handicapped by a sense of guilt by association of ideas, a
sense of guilt carefully inculcated by the ONLY RACISM WHICH IS ACCEPTED IN
THE WORLD!!! If it is ANTI-SEMITIC to suggest that the Holocaust is a
fraud, isn't is DICTATORIALLY RACIST to insist to forbid all free
discussion about it?
It is necessary to say another word about the ultimate motive in
suppressing the search for the truth, which has perhaps become the
principal motive of the most lucid among the Zionists already feeling a
sense of fear: IF THE LIE WERE GENERALLY REVEALED, THE RESULT WOULD BE A
WAVE OF HOSTILITY, likely sooner or later to engender a true Holocaust. To
prevent such a reaction, the wound must be cleaned without delay, as long
as the old basis of civilization still exists in Europe! A Europe which,
despite its losses and its ruin, would be content to free itself from the
Jewish yoke, in politics, in the media, in economics, a yoke which
"deculturizes" us, but from which the Europeans would still be content
simply to denounce as a lie in the face of the world.
Later, the "multi-racial" societies engendered by Zionism could turn
against the Zionists and prove themselves to be more ferocious to the
sorcerer's apprentices of Zionism and their racial brethren who believed in
good faith in this devastating myth!
Judaism declared war in 1932, 1933, and 1939, a war which cost 50 million
real deaths, against a Germany which was the only rampart against both
international capitalism and bolshevism… the two jaws of the pincers "made
in Zion" which have crushed EUROPE!
IT IS A RIGHT AND A DUTY TO SEARCH FOR THE TRUTH ABOUT THIS TRAGEDY!
 
 
 
End




From cwporter@tornado.be Mon Jan 12 08:29:01 EST 1998
Article: 159464 of alt.revisionism
From: "CARLOS W. PORTER" 
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: holocaust museum of stupidity
Date: 12 Jan 1998 13:40:08 GMT
Organization: Tornado News Processing System
Lines: 99
Message-ID: <01bd1f51$01c5e380$065795c2@default>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.149.87.6
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news-feed.inet.tele.dk!bofh.vszbr.cz!europa.clark.net!206.229.87.25!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news-peer-east.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!news.idt.net!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!atl-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.planetc.com!tornix.tornado.be!not-for-mail
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.revisionism:159464


HOLOCAUST MUSEUM OF STUPIDITY
Now Opening at a Location Near You 



[On 5 December 1997, the court rejected the defendant's defence of
justified absence due to pedal-driven brain-bashing machine induced
injuries, partly on the grounds that he had failed to specify the exact
date of his injury! How stupid can you get? He was given one week in which
to object, in German.]
 



TRANSLATION OF JUDGEMENT OF 5 DECEMBER 1997
18 Ns 112 Js 116737/96
Regarding: Criminal proceedings against Porter, Carlos
For incitement to racial hatred

[Short excerpts only]


…[The defendant] stated that he had been unable to attend the main trial on
10 October 1997 due to "severe cranial injuries and concussion". With
regards to the other statements, reference is made to the letter of the
defendant dated 5 November 1997, which was translated. 
[This means: the letter of 7 November will be ignored.]


[…etc., etc., blah, blah, blah.]

…The mere assertion of severe cranial injuries and concussion is
insufficient to constitute justified failure to appear. Because there is no
indication of the date [!!!]. In addition, the claim was not substantiated
[!].
The doctor's certificate mentioned by the accused in his letter of
05.11.1997, was not presented [!]. Nor was this failure made good in the
letter
of the defendant dated 7.11.1997 in which the accused stated that he had 
recovered from his cranial injuries [!]. Furthermore, the accused, in his
letter to the court dated 1 September 1997, had [already] stated at length
that he
would refuse to appear. [OK; so why bother with the trial?]

[…etc., etc., blah, blah, blah.]

Kunert

Presiding Judge
Regional Court
[certified true copy, etc., etc.]


[The defendant was then given one week in which to protest the rejection of
his defence of justified absence due to pedal-driven brain-bashing machine
induced injuries.]

…The objection must be in German.]

---

OBJECTION [by fax on 5 January 1997]

Judge Kunert,

[address, references, etc.]

Es ist mein Pflicht, Ihnen mitzuteilen , dass, indem Sie die
Glaubwuerdigkeit meiner durch die in dem Nuernbergerprozess beschriebenen
(IMT VII 377 [416-417]) Pedal-angetriebene Gehirnzertruemmerungsmachine
verursachten Kopfverletzungen anzweifeln bzw leugnen, Sie mich in meiner
Menchenwuerde verletzen, was mir ganz schwere psychische und Gefuehlsleiden
verursachen muss. Ich fuehle mich herabwuerdigt und beleidigt. Sie werden
von meinem Rechtsanwalt hoeren. Im uebrigens, wuerde ich am 9. Oktober
schwer verbrannt durch Ausstrahlungen von deutschen Atomwaffen aus dem
Zweiten Weltkrieg [IMT XVI 529-530 [580]) und bin immer noch radioactiv.

Carlos W. Porter

 [translation]

It is my duty to inform you that in disputing or denying the credibility of
my cranial injuries caused by the pedal-driven brain-basing machine
described in the Nuremberg Trial transcript [IMT VII 377 [416-417] you
injure my dignity as a human being, causing me serious psychic disturbances
and emotional anguish. I feel humiliated and insulted. You will be hearing
>from  my lawyer about this. I also suffered severe radiation burns on 9
October 1997 while handling the German World War II atomic bomb described
in the Nuremberg trial transcript [IMT XVI 529-530 [580]) and am still
radioactive.

Carlos W. Porter

[to be continued]






From cwporter@tornado.be Wed Jan 14 06:05:25 EST 1998
Article: 159639 of alt.revisionism
From: "CARLOS W. PORTER" 
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: verb autrotten in German documents
Date: 13 Jan 1998 17:16:40 GMT
Organization: Tornado News Processing System
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <01bd2038$731bc8a0$155795c2@default>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.149.87.21
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!oronet!news-stk-11.sprintlink.net!news-stk-3.sprintlink.net!news-west.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!atl-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.planetc.com!tornix.tornado.be!not-for-mail
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.revisionism:159639

 
I have made a bit of a study of the use of the verb "ausrotten" in the
German original of The Decline of the West, by Oswald Spengler (Deutsche
Taschenbuch Verlag, Muenich). As you know, the book was finished in 1922,
and published in 1923.
 
"Ausrotten" appears to be a fairly unusual verb in German.
 
Spengler uses the verb "vernichten" (to exterminate or destroy) many times,
but the verb "ausrotten" (to exterminate or destroy) occurs only 5 times,
on pages 932, 1050, and 1066.
 
On pp. 1050 and 1066 it is used to mean physical extermination or killing.
 
On p. 932 it is used purely figuratively. The sentence is: "In der
Zerstoerung von Sybaris durch Kroton, der sicherlich nur als Hoehepunkt
eines wilden Religionskrieges in der geschichtlichen Erinnerung haften
blieb, entlud sich derselbe Hass, der auch in Karl I von England und seinen
froehlichen Kavalieren nicht nur eine Irrlehre, sondern auch die weltliche
Gesinnung ausrotten wollte."
 
"The destruction of Sybaris by Croton, which certainly remained in
historical memory as simply the climax of a savage war of religion, was an
explosion of the same hatred which also wished to extirpate, in Charles I
of England, not only a false doctrine, but a worldly way of thinking."
 
If "ausrotten" means to "exterminate", one can exterminate a king and his
cavaliers, but not a "false doctrine" and a "worldly way of thinking". Did
Oliver Cromwell erect gas chambers to exterminate the king and his
cavaliers? Or was he merely content with a social and religious revolution?
 
 
 
 
Yours faithfully,
 
Carlos W, Porter
 
 
 
 



From cwporter@tornado.be Wed Jan 14 06:05:25 EST 1998
Article: 159647 of alt.revisionism
From: "CARLOS W. PORTER" 
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: chemistry of the holocaust
Date: 13 Jan 1998 17:16:03 GMT
Organization: Tornado News Processing System
Lines: 547
Message-ID: <01bd2038$38676700$155795c2@default>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.149.87.21
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news.cs.ucla.edu!news.greennet.net!uunet!in4.uu.net!korova.insync.net!news.io.com!mr.net!news-chi-1.sprintlink.net!news-east.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!atl-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.planetc.com!tornix.tornado.be!not-for-mail
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.revisionism:159647







	THE CHEMISTRY OF THE HOLOCAUST


	It has escaped the notice of most people that stories of a "Nazi
Holocaust" during World War II are actually impossible as regards the
chemistry of poisons. This can be verified by calling or writing the
American Cyanamid Co., Box 31, Linden, NJ 07036, telephone (201) 862-6000,
or by consulting standard reference works such as the various editions (in
particular the 11th) of the Encyclopedia Britannica under "Hydrocyanic
Acid", "Prussic Acid", "Poisons", Gleason's Clinical Toxicology of
Commercial Products, or Legal Medicine and Toxicology by Peterson, Haines
and Webster (2nd edition).

	One might be permitted to ask:

	(a) whether there is any such thing as an "amethyst-blue crystal of
hydrogen cyanide" (Reitlinger, The Final Solution, p. 160; Shirer, Rise and
Fall of the Third Reich, p. 970);

	(b) whether hydrogen cyanide can be solidified at room temperature in an
ordinary tin can (Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews, p. 566,
"The hydrogen cyanide, solidified into pellets, immediately passed into the
gaseous state");

	(c) whether hydrogen cyanide can be made to crystallize in a vacuum and
become gaseous upon exposure to air ("I used Zyklon B, which was a
crystallized prussic acid", Rudolf Hoess at Nuremberg, quoted in Shirer, p.
968); (1)

	(d) whether potassium cyanide becomes immediately gaseous upon exposure to
air '"The use of special chemicals, such as Zyklon B [potassium cyanide]
..... from a special opening in the ceiling, Zyklon B crystals were
introduced, becoming immediately gaseous". Moshe Pearlmann, The Capture and
Trial of Adolph Eichmann, pp. 375, 385) (Note: Is potassium cyanide a
crystal?);

	(e) whether any salt of cyanide in the absence of an acid could release
lethal quantities of poisonous gas in 30 seconds ("He gave me a bottle
containing about half a pint of salts. I think they were salts of
cyanide... I introduced a certain quantity of salt through a tube... they
breathed for about half a minute before they fell to the floor". Joseph
Kramer at the Balsen Trial, quoted in Shirer, p. 981);

	(f) whether humidity is an antidote to cyanide poisoning ("The subject, a
girl aged 15, was saved by contact with the humidity of the cement floor",
Reitlinger, p. 157;

	(g) whether victims of cyanide poisoning retain consciousness ("We knew
when the people were dead, because their screaming stopped". Rudolf Hoess,
former Auschwitz commander, at Nuremberg, quoted in Rise and Fall of the
Third Reich, p. 968); (1)

	This is medically impossible. The Merck Index of Dangerous Properties of
Industrial Chemicals (p. 623) describes the symptoms of cyanide poisoning
as "unconsciousness, convulsions and respiratory arrest". Clinical
Toxicology of Commercial Products (Gleason, p. 76) lists them as
"unconsciousness followed promptly by violent convulsions". The
Encyclopedia Britannica ("Prussic Acid", 1911) says, "The patient is quite
unconscious".

	Legal Medicine and Toxicology (Peterson, Haines and Webster, 2nd Edition)
remarks (Vol. 2, p. 678), "The patient falls to the ground insensible", and
mentions a case history in which the victim was unconscious for six hours!

	The same standard reference work contains numerous case histories of
accidental or suicidal cyanide poisoning. P. 682: "... fell to the ground
insensible... died quietly without any further struggle 15 or 20 minutes
after taking the poison... he did not scream... fell to the ground
completely insensible, he died in about 10 minutes"; p. 681: "... loss of
consciousness...  complete insensibility... signs of returning
consciousness in two hours after admission..."; p. 679: ... "a healthy
woman... died in 15 to 20 minutes. ... in another case a man took a similar
dose and was insensible for four hours, but recovered"; p. 677: "In some
cases the patient staggers a few steps, and then falls down and dies in
five minutes or less without sound  or convulsion".

	Hoess could only ascertain death by entering the chamber and taking pulse
or heartbeat. Cyanide is not practical for mass killing in concentrations
less than that required to cause instant death ("Poison Gas Warfare", 1922
Supplement, Encyclopedia Britannica). (2)

	The concentrations required to kill quickly are extremely high and must be
exactly known - not guessed at by listening to unconscious people.

	(h) whether anything can be a crystal, a pellet, a "gas crystal" (?)
(Shirer, p. 971), a salt and a gas all at the same time, as well as two
different chemicals at once ("this dangerous gas", etc, "these tins of
gas". Rudolf Hoess in Poland six months later, according to the Communist
ghost-written autobiography, Commandant at Auschwitz, p. 208);

	(i) whether any solid of cyanide intended to kill fleas and lice would be
an efficient instrument for purposes of mass murder, compared to the ethyl
cyanide or cyanic acid used in the manufacture of fulminate of mercury
(Leschke, Clinical Toxicology,  p. 56) or the acrylonitrile used to make
Buna nitrile (GBR) rubber ("Organically bound cyanides, i.e.,
acrylonitrile, are sometimes used as fumigant gases, especially for
grains", Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products, p. 74; "Also developed
by the Germans (GBR) ... manufactured in large tonnage during the war...
copolymerized with acrylonitrile... up to 40% acrylonitrile by volume".
Colliers Encyclopedia, "Rubber", 1965);

	Please note: the Monowitz Rubber Plant at Auschwitz was one of the largest
in the world, established by I.G. Farben. Farben held the patient for
Zyklon B, and was supposedly cooperating in the mass gassings. Krupp
established a huge munitions plant at Auschwitz. Fulminate of mercury is a
primary explosive related chemically to the cyanides (Encyclopedia
Britannica, "Fulminic Acid"). Hydrocyanic acid is explosive (Sax, Dangerous
Properties of Industrial Chemicals, p. 764);

	(j) whether cyanide gas is heavier than air, since it was supposedly
released from the ceiling, ("... looking up at the shower heads, from which
no water came... realized the gas was coming out of the vents..." Shirer,
p. 970).

	(k) whether "powerful fans" are a smart way to get rid of cyanide gas in
an industrial complex housing 200,000 people, etc. (3)

	Needless to say, the answer to every one of these questions is "No".

	Zyklon B was a commercially manufactured fumigant intended for fleas and
lice packed in a 200-gram tin can. Since 200 grams of pure hydrocyanic acid
could kill at least 2,000 people, it was evidently highly diluted (4).
Hydrocyanic acid "in the pure state is said to kill with a lightning-like
rapidity. It is met with in commerce only in a diluted state..."
(Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th edition, "Poisons"). "A stout, muscular man,
aged 40, drank by mistake half an ounce of 1.48 percent solution of
hydrocyanic acid... fell suddenly, completely insensible... he died... in
about ten minutes" (Legal Medicine and Toxicology,  Vol. 2, p. 682).

	At the rate of 60-100 milligrams per person, the manufacture of 1,000 tons
of nitrile rubber could require enough pure hydrocyanic acid for the
preparation of acrylonitrile to "gas" the entire world! (Note: In practice,
as opposed to theory, "mass gassings" require huge amounts of poison,
because the air acts as a dilutant and filter. The liquid must evaporate
and fill the entire chamber to an extremely high concentration, which takes
time. To kill 2000 people in 2 minutes would probably require a ton of pure
cyanide). (5)

	According to pre-Nuremberg technical literature, the active ingredient in
Zyklon B was a liquid "absorbed in granular diatomite" (Encyclopedia
Britannica, "Hydrocyanic Acid", 1943).

	A single inhalation of pure hydrocyanic acid (60 milligrams) produces near
instantaneous unconsciousness followed by death in several minutes.

	Zyklon B (which the "Holocaust experts" claim was used to gas the Jews),
in contrast, was so fantastically weak that to kill clothes moths with
Zyklon required 16 grams per cubic meter over a 24-hour exposure. (Source:
Document NI-9912, Office of the Chief Counsel for War Crimes, 1947, a
translation of directions issued by the Health Institute of the
Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia in Prague, p. 6).

	A Polish Communist, Pelagia Lewinska (Twenty Months at Auschwitz, p. 55),
has remarked: "The gas [Zyklon] was too weak, did not always kill the lice
and did no harm whatsoever against the nits".

	According to post-Nuremberg Jewish "historians", Zyklon B was a commercial
bug-bomb packed in a tin can which apparently no one ever opened,
containing non-existent crystals, salts or pellets compressed to kill
fleas, reacting in an impossible way and releasing fumes which went down
instead of up, producing impossible symptoms, and that this dilute mixture
was used in preference to tons of an extremely powerful poison which was
readily available!


	THE OVENS


	The German edition of Shirer's Rise and Fall (p. 1025 in the Knaur
paperback edition) contains a footnote which is apparently the result of a
legal action brought against the German publishers by the manufacturer of
the crematory ovens at Belgrade (the Didier-Werke). The note observes that
the "dimensions are those which are standard for crematory ovens of a
not-very-modern design intended for smaller cemeteries, and would be
unsuitable for mass burnings".

	Anyone who has ever tried to burn magazines in a trash can will
immediately recognize that the technical problems involved in designing a
crematory oven capable of burning several thousand corpses a day would be
practically insurmountable. Such an oven would have to be equipped with
giant mechanical arms to keep the bodies stirred up as well as an apparatus
to keep the fuel and air evenly distributed.

	Photographs of German ovens taken immediately after the war show 18-inch
doors about two feet off the floor. Those at Buchenwald have even been
photographed with the doors open, showing back and side walls, grid and
grate, very clearly.

	The story according to Hilberg, Shirer and others is that the ovens proved
"inefficient", and the bodies were finally burned in the open using wood
and petroleum for fuel. The buildings were razed and the landscape altered
by planting trees (!) thus conveniently destroying all real evidence.

	(Source of "information": The Soviet Union at Nuremberg).

	Legal Medicine and Toxicology observes (Vol. 2, pp. 881-883) that it
requires 40 hours to burn a human body using wood as fuel. "A body of
ordinary size is completely cremated when gas is used as a fuel in one
hour; when petroleum is used, from one and a half to two hours are
required. The ash which remains, which consists entirely of mineral
substances, all organic compounds having been destroyed, weighs from five
to nine pounds, depending on the size of the body".

	This means 15,000 to 27,000 tons of ashes for six million people. Where is
it? As usual, we are left with only the Communists to tell us how it all
came to disappear.

	The cremation of 16,000 bodies a day (according to Rudolf Hoess) using
petroleum as fuel would require over 1,000 ovens. Where are they?

	The larger camps have four or five; the smaller camps have one or two; and
they are coal-fired. What kind of murder program is this?

	When one considers that there are no oversize ovens; no "gas chambers"
which have not repeatedly been proven to be merely shower baths, which is
what they were supposed to have been in the first place ("See those shower
heads? This is a gas chamber. Two dollars, please".); no significant
quantity of ashes or skeletons; no documents which are not Zionist or
Communist forgeries; that the chemical reactions, symptoms and crematory
processes described are impossible; and that Jews have never cooperated
with a census at any time in history (see I Chronicles: 21 and II Samuel:
24), one is tempted to ask: if millions of them really disappeared during
the war, how would we know it? By believing what we see on TV? Surely not.

	The slaughter of 1.5 million Cambodians by the Communists was given an
average of 20-seconds evening network-news coverage per month. By contrast
an imaginary atrocity involving Jews 40 years ago gets nine and one-half
hours in one week! Is this lack of proportion coincidental?

Notes:

(1) The "confession" referred to in (c) and (g) was written entirely in
English by Lt. Col. Smith W. Brookhart Jr. (reportedly still living at 18
Hillside Drive, Denver, Colorado USA 80215). There is no proof that Hoess
understood English. The translation into German dated 3 days later was
never signed. Brookhart was the son of a Senator from Washington, Iowa. A
person who knows the family well is Rev. George McDaniel of St. Ambrose
University, 518 Locust St., Davenport, Iowa.

(2) What the article actually says is: "A gas is classed as immediately
fatal when death follows exposure for a period of two minutes to a certain
concentration (i.e., a certain proportion of the air breathed). A higher
concentration may cause instantaneous death. The only known compounds
which, in concentrations practically obtainable, produce immediate death
are those containing cyanogen. The chief disadvantage of these compounds is
that when the concentration is not sufficient to cause death, they have no
effect at all... the specific lethal gases will only produce their effect
in very high concentrations, which means that a large number of shells must
be used simultaneously over a certain area..."

(3) These fans never existed. See the Leuchter Report.

(4) This is an error. See the Leuchter Report.

(5) American prisons have been known use up to 2 pounds of cyanide salt in
acid to generate the gas required to kill one convict in a very small
chamber in much longer than 2 minutes. The convict is unconscious in 40
seconds, but may take 15 minutes to die. See "Until You Are Dead:
Executions in America" by Frederick Drimmer, pp. 57-59. See also page 12,
column 1 of the Leuchter Report, Focal Point edition.

This essay was written in 1978 and revised in 1985. It has been rendered
obsolete by the Leuchter Report published in 1988. I continue to make the
essay available despite its shortcomings because it was only the
impossibility of the chemical reactions which first convinced me that the
Holocaust was a lie.

	"ANTI-SEMITISM"
	IN THE ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA

A truism of liberalism is that the truth may be approximated through a
comparison of opinion.

	In the Encyclopedia Britannica, for example, all articles dealing directly
with Jewish matters are written by Jews and Rabbis, dripping with self-pity
and self-praise.

	Articles on peripheral subjects, however, tell a different story.

	From the 1911 ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA

RUSSIA:

"The Semitic race is represented by upwards of 5,000,000 Jews... The
rapidity with which they peopled certain towns (e.g., Odessa) and whole
provinces was really prodigious. The law of Russia prohibits them from
entering Great Russia, only the wealthiest and best educated enjoying this
privilege; nevertheless they are met with everywhere, even in the Urals.
Their chief abodes, however, continue to be Poland... Organized as they are
into a kind of community for mutual protection and mutual help, they soon
become masters of the trade wherever they penetrate. In the villages, they
are mostly innkeepers, intermediaries in trade, and pawnbrokers..." (vol.
XXIII, p. 855).

"The numerous outbreaks against the Jews are directed, not against their
creed, but against them as keen business men and extortionate
money-lenders..." (p. 885).

"The wealth of Russia consisting mainly of raw produce, the trade of the
country turns chiefly on the purchase of this for export... this traffic is
in the hands of a great number of middlemen - in the West, Jews, and
elsewhere Russians - to whom the peasants are for the most part in debt..."
(p. 890).

"In the rest of the country they had not been allowed to reside in the
villages, because their habits of keeping vodkashops and lending money at
usurious interest were found to demoralize the peasantry..." (p. 906).


RUMANIA:

"Their improvidence soon got them into the hands of Jewish money-lenders,
who, fortunately for the peasants, were by law unable to become proprietors
of the soil..." (vol. XXIII, p. 828).

"The bitter feeling against them in Rumania is not so much due to religious
fanaticism as to the fear that if given political and other rights they
will gradually possess themselves of the whole soil... in many places they
have a monopoly of the wine and spirit shops, and retail trade generally;
and as they are always willing to advance money on usery, and are more
intelligent and better educated than the ordinary peasant, there is little
doubt that in a country where the large landowners are proverbially
extravagant, and the peasant proprietors needy, the soil would soon fall
into the hand of the Jews were it not for the stringent laws which prevent
them from owning land outside the towns. When in addition it is considered
that the Moldavian Jews, who are mostly of Polish and Russian origin, speak
a foreign language, wear a distinguishing dress and keep themselves aloof
>from  their neighbours, the antipathy in which they are held by the
Rumanians generally may be understood" (p. 829).


HUNGARY:

"The Jews... monopolize a large portion of trade, are with the Germans the
chief employers of labour, and control not only the finances but to a great
extent the government and the press of the country. Owing to the
improvidence of the Hungarian landowners and the poverty of the peasants,
the soil of the country is gradually passing into their hands" (vol. XIII,
p. 897).


GERMANY:

"Nearly all the bankers and stockbrokers in Germany were Jews. Many of the
leaders of the liberal parties, e.g., Bamberger and Lasker, were of Jewish
origin; the doctrines of Liberalism were supported by papers owned and
edited by Jews; hence the wish to restore more fully the avowed Christian
character of the state, coinciding with the attack on the influence of
finance, which owed so much to the Liberal economic doctrines, easily
degenerated into attacks on the Jews" (vol. XI, p. 888).


	From the 1922 ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA

POLAND:

"THE JEWISH QUESTION: One of the most important questions to be considered
by the new Polish State is that of the Jews. Numerically they form roughly
one seventh of the population. In Warsaw a third of the population are
Jews; in many provincial towns four out of every five inhabitants are Jews,
and in some nine out of ten, and of these the vast majority are Eastern
Jews who in language, religion, and customs differ from the population.
Their language is Yiddish, a Middle-High German dialect; for the purposes
of writing, Hebrew characters are used. Their dress is peculiar to
themselves and their unclean habits and low standards of conduct "are
neither European nor modern". The Western Jew is the more civilized type
which is generally found in Western Europe, speaking the language and
conforming to the habits of Western civilization.

"The Eastern Jew is essentially a business or commercial man, but rarely a
producer. He is usually a middleman or intermediary. In towns the majority
of the shops are owned by Jews, but they are a race apart, hated and
despised by the rest of the population, devoted to their religion, which is
a primitive type of Judaism.

"The Jews have been settled in Poland between 800 and 1,000 years so that
they can hardly be considered "strangers" in the land; in fact the Slavs
cannot be considered very much more native than they. It was not, however,
until about 20 years ago that the present quarrel between the Jews and the
Poles began. The Tsarist Government drove the Jews out of Russia but gave
them exceptional advantages in Poland. These Litvaks (as they were called)
openly professed themselves the partisans of Russia & founded the Jewish
press which set to work openly to fight against Polish autonomy. The Poles
attacked the Jews before the war by means of a national boycott, the only
means by which one subject race could attack another. During and after the
war the hostility to the Jews was increased by the fact that in the German
occupation the Jew was a willing tool of the invader and by the close
connection between the Jews and Bolshevism. The hostility to the Jews was
marked in 1918 and 1919 by excesses in which some 200-300 have in fact been
killed, but which have been enormously exaggerated by the Jewish press.

"... Capt. Peter Wright, in his very valuable and interesting report states
(Cmd 674, 1920, pp. 17-36) that the great majority of the poor Jews are of
the Eastern type and extreme Orthodoxy (Chassidim). They form an immense
mass of squalid and helpless poverty and Capt. Wright's only recommendation
is that the richer Jews should study the condition of the poor Jews, who
either trade as small middlemen, as hawkers or touts... They are driven to
all sorts of illicit and fraudulent practices and in England, in the East
End of London... too large a proportion of convictions for such offenses
can be laid to their account. They are unfit for the modern economic world
for want of education and for Western society because of their habits and
want of cleanliness. They are devoted to their strange old religion but as
they grow richer their piety, as the Chief Rabbi told Capt. Wright, is
destroyed by wealth and they take too little interest in their poorer
brethren. No one who knows Poland can be surprised at the Polish attitude
or the desire of the Poles to be rid of this corrupting influence" (vol.
XXXII, p. 123).


HUNGARY:

"The Jewish question has become important in Hungary... As they grew rich
through trade, the ghetto became too small for them. As they owned no land,
they were not tied to the soil and streamed into the cities, where they
found more opportunities of making money and adding to their wealth. Above
all Budapest, as the centre of commerce and industry and the seat of the
banks, had a strong attraction for them. Three distinct classes of the Jews
grew up: the Orthodox, who wished to remain Jews with all the habits and
customs of the ghetto; those who in most respects relinquished their
position of religious isolation and strove after assimilation... and
thirdly the cosmopolitan Jews, the revolutionaries, who were the enemies of
all national feeling and represented materialistic internationalism. It was
the part played by this third class of Jews... which has made the Jewish
question acute in Hungary. As Hungary has no true middle class, they
exercised great influence on the intellectual life of the country..." (vol.
XXXI, p. 408).

"Instead of the national heroes, Marx, Engels & Lenin were glorified... In
boys and girls schools, the pupils received enlightened instruction in the
processes of generation, birth, etc., with disastrous results to the
juvenile morality" (p. 416).

"The leaders of the Social Democrats and Bourgeois Radicals were, almost
without exception, of Jewish origin. This was also the case with the most
prominent members of Government of the Republic..; these were the men who
had made it impossible to resist the invasion of Hungary by force of
arms..." (p. 415).

"Since most of the ruling politicians and People's Commissars... belonged
to the younger generation of Jews anti-Communist feeling in the country
assumed more and more the character of anti-Semitism" (p. 417).

"One consequence of the Bolshevist rule was the still more intense
development of anti-Semitic feeling. Since the leaders of the Communists
were chiefly recruited among the younger Jewish intellectual circles, the
National Assembly in order to prevent the creation of a Jewish intellectual
proletariat, in Sept. 1920, proclaimed "Numerus Clausus" for the
universities. Under this clause, Jews could only be admitted to the
universities in proportion to their percentage of the population" (p. 418).


ANGOLA:

"Southern Angola in 1909-11, was regarded as a probable choice by the
Jewish Territorial Association as a field for colonization, and Portugal
enacted land laws with a view to that contingency. But Angola was rejected
as a home for the Jews" (vol. XXX, p. 139).


	From the 1928 ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA


JEWS:

"The Jewish population of the world on the outbreak of the War in 1914 may
be estimated at about 14,900,000...

"The Jews whole-heatedly supported the revolution... Among the Bolshevik
leaders & their satellites were a certain number of Jews... At the same
time, the American Jews began to play a part of growing importance in the
Zionist movement and were concerned in the negotiations leading up to the
Balfour Declaration (*) of which President Wilson was a consistent and
influential advocate" (vol. II, p. 605).

"In both Russia and Hungary a prominent part in the Bolshevik movement was
played by men who, though long disassociated from the Jewish community,
were nevertheless of Jewish birth" (p. 606).


HUNGARY:

"The people's commissars and practically all the leading persons were Jews,
a fact which explains the anti-Jewish feeling which later prevailed in
Hungary..." (vol. II, p. 393).


ZIONISM:

"Not long after the outbreak of the war, Dr. Weizmann and his friends were
brought in touch with a number of influential public men... What the
Zionists proposed was, in effect, that Great Britain should make it part of
the policy to provide in the peace settlement for the establishment in
Palestine of a national home for the Jews...

"By the beginning of 1916, the British Government had come to the
conclusion that there were other and more practical reasons for taking
Zionism seriously...

"The hour of decision was approaching in the United States, where there was
a Jewish population of over 3,000,000... A declaration in favour of Zionism
would help to rally Jewish opinion throughout the world to the side of the
Allies... President Wilson had personally intervened to make it clear that
he would welcome a British pronouncement in favour of Zionism... in 1922
resolutions associating the United States with the policy embodied in the
Declaration were unanimously adopted by both Houses of Congress. At the
insistence of Great Britain a Zionist delegation was given a hearing by the
Peace Conference in Paris on Feb. 27, 1919..." (vol. III, p. 1139).

"The Arabs did not take kindly to the Balfour Declaration, which they did
not altogether unnaturally misconstrue... there were anti-Jewish
demonstrations in Jerusalem in 1920..." (p. 1140).


BAVARIA:

"Meanwhile, the Nationalist leagues had gained in strength and now began to
defy the Governments orders. The most powerful of them were the National
Socialists, an extreme militaristic, nationalist, and, above all,
anti-Semite body, nominally democratic in tendency, but actually largely
used by the rich to break strikes and attack Socialism. This body was
raised from obscurity by one Hitler, a good demagogue but no politician...
Hitler and other leaders were sent to prison or lunatic asylums" (vol. I,
p. 342).

	There is a saying in French: the more things change the more they are the
same. The Jew is eternal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

* The Balfour Declaration was a declaration made by Lord Balfour on Nov. 2,
1917, that the British government favoured a national home for the Jewish
people in Palestine, supposedly, without prejudice to the civil and
religious rights of the existing non-Jewish communities. This theft of
Palestine from its people has caused more pain and suffering to the
Palestinians than the Iraqis would have ever brought upon Kuwait by its
annexation.







From cwporter@tornado.be Wed Jan 14 06:05:26 EST 1998
Article: 159762 of alt.revisionism
From: "CARLOS W. PORTER" 
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: war crimes trials
Date: 14 Jan 1998 11:38:06 GMT
Organization: Tornado News Processing System
Lines: 233
Message-ID: <01bd20d2$550bce60$035795c2@default>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.149.87.3
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!tor-nx1.netcom.ca!chippy.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!atl-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.planetc.com!tornix.tornado.be!not-for-mail
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.revisionism:159762



War Crimes Trials


By Carlos Porter 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approximately 10,000 "War Crimes Trials" have been held since 1945. Trials
of Japanese military personnel ended in 1949, yet "war crimes trials" of
Germans and Eastern Europeans continue to date. 

Almost invariably, the charge is "violation of the laws and customs of
war", derived, in turn, from international conventions signed at the Hague
in 1899 and 1907. 

That these trials have little or no basis in law is clear from the wording
of the treaties which are said to have been violated. 

Let us take a typical example, the Hague Declaration (IV, 3) of 1899 on the
Use of Expanding Bullets, dated July 29, 1899. 

The Convention states, 

"The Contracting Parties agree to abstain from the use of bullets which
expand or flatten easily in the human body, such as bullets with a hard
envelope which does not entirely cover the core, or is pierced with
incisions. 

"The present Declaration is only binding for the Contracting Powers in the
case of a war between two or more of them. 

"It shall cease to be binding from the time when, in a war between the
contracting Powers, one of the belligerants is joined by a non-contracting
Power". 

The United States never ratified this convention, which, thus, never became
"international law" in any war involving the United States. This was
because American troops were busy using expanding bullets against
Philipinos whom they had just "liberated" from the Spanish. American
refusal to ratify this convention meant, not only that the United States
was free to continue using expanding (or dum-dum) bullets legally in all
wars, but from the moment the United States entered any conflict, all other
belligerants were free to use them as well. (**) 

This is called an "all-participation clause". 

There are fourteen Hague Conventions, almost all of which contain similar
clauses, and for this reason have had little or no application since 1907. 

The Fifth Hague Convention Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral
Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land of 18 October 1907, for example,
states: 

Art. 20: "The provisions of the present Convention do not apply except
between Contracting Powers, and then only if all the belligerants are
parties to the Convention". 

This Convention was never ratified by Great Britain, and never applied
after August 4, 1914. 

Art. 1: "The territory of neutral Powers is inviolable". 

Nevertheless, the British and Americans never tired of quoting this clause
against the German and Japanese despite their own violation of the
neutrality of Iceland, Greenland, Persia, Irak, Portuguese Timor, and the
planned violation of Scandinavian neutrality. 

The Third Hague Convention Respecting the Opening of Hostilities states,
article 1, states: 

"The contracting powers recognize that hostilities between themselves must
not commence without previous and explicit warning, in the form either of a
reasoned declaration of war or an ultimatum with conditional declaration of
war". 

The problem here is that the "warning" may be as little as one minute, and
no verbal formula is required. Poland received two ultimatums and was the
first to mobilize. America received a formal declaration 25 minutes late,
of which it had actual knowledge 10 days beforehand. 

However, the basis of nearly all "war crimes trials" has been the Fourth
Hague Convention Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land. In the
words of Telford Taylor, Chief Counsel and Representative of the United
States for the Prosecution of War Crimes at Nuremberg: 

"An Annex to the Convention," consisting of 56 articles, sets forth various
requirements and limitations with respect to the conduct of hostilities,
the treatment of prisoners of war, and the exercise of authority over the
occupied territory of a hostile state" (*). 

This, then, is the Convention which the Germans and Japanese were alleged
to have violated in 10,000 trials. What does the Convention say exactly? 

Art. 2: "The provisions... of the present Convention do not apply except
between contracting Powers, and then only if all the belligerants are
parties to the Convention". 

This condition has remained unfulfilled since August 1, 1914.
Non-signatories during WWII included Italy, Greece, and the national states
of Yugoslavia. Communist Russia repudiated all Czarist agreements and never
made any pretence of obeying the Hague or Geneva Conventions. 

Art. 3: "Belligerants violating the Convention may be made to pay
compensation". 

This is self-explanatory. No trials were contemplated. 

THE ANNEX TO THE 4th HAGUE CONVENTION 

The Annex to the Convention was the real basis for nearly all of these
10,000 trials. This is the Convention which defines "war crimes" and "war
criminals"... 

Articles 1 and 2 prohibit guerrilla warfare, stating that belligerants must
be "commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates... have a fixed
distinctive emblem recognizable at a distance... carry arms openly... and
conduct their operations in accordance with the laws and customs of war". 

Thus the European and Asian resistance movements were illegal. 

Article 43 requires collaboration with occupation governments. "The
authority of the legitimate power having in fact passed into the hands of
the occupant, the latter shall take all the measures in his power to
restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety, while
respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country".


The "collaborators" shot, hanged, or imprisoned after WWII were acting in
compliance with international law. 

Article 23 (3) prohibits weapons calculated to cause unnecessary suffering.


Napalm, phosphorous, jellied gasoline, etc. are illegal. 

Articles 25, 27 and 56 prohibit bombardment "by whatever means" of
undefended cities, cultural monuments, etc... 

The fire bombings of Dresden and civilian areas of Hamburg, Tokyo,
Hiroshima, Nagasaki, etc., were illegal. 

Article 6 states that belligerants may utilize the labour of prisoners of
war, officers excepted, for the public service, for private persons or
their own account. 

German and Japanese "slave policy" was perfectly legal insofar as it
applied to members of resistance groups or lower ranking military
personnel. 

Article 8: "Prisoners of war are subject to the laws, regulations and
orders in force of the State in whose power they are. Any act of
insubordination justifies the adoption towards them of such measures of
severity as may be considered necessary". 

So much for the "mistreatment of prisoners" which formed the basis of so
many war crimes trials. 

Article 46: "Private property cannot be confiscated". 

The post-WWII expulsions and confiscations were illegal. The provisions of
the Versailles Treaty which confiscated the private property of all German
citizens resident outside Germany, including missionaries on South sea
islands, who were expelled and sent home penniless, were illegal. 

Art. 5: "Prisoners... cannot be confined except as an indispensable measure
of safety, and only while the circumstances which necessitate the measure
continue to exist", and Art. 20: "After the conclusion of peace, the
repatriation of prisoners shall be carried out as quickly as possible". 

The prolonged detention of German and Japanese prisoners by the British,
French, Russians and Americans for years after the war was illegal. 

Art. 7: "Prisoners of war shall be treated as regards board, lodging, and
clothing on the same footing as the troops of the Government who captured
them". 

The conditions of detention in "Eisenhower's death camps" were illegal
whatever the death rate. (See Other Losses by James Bacque). 

Art. 32: "A person is regarded as a parlementaire who has been authorized
by one of the belligerants to enter into communications with the other...
he has a right to inviolability". 

The detention of Rudolph Hess was illegal. 

Finally, article 23 (h) prohibits declaring "abolished, suspended, or
inadmissible in a court of law the rights and actions of the nationals of
the hostile party". 

If these treaties have any application at all (which is doubtful), the real
war criminals were the Americans, the British, the French, and the
Russians. 

The illegalities of "war crimes" proceedings include the admissibility of
oral and written hearsay, the introduction of the concept of "conspiracy"
into international law (unknown prior to 1945), the total lack of any
pre-trial inquest or forensic evidence, and trial before a court itself
composed of actual "war criminals". 

To return to the writings of Telford Taylor: 

"The issues surrounding the war crimes trials are numerous and complex;
discussion and criticism of what was done should be welcomed by all who
hope for a continuing development of international law... but what should
have been done instead is a problem generally ignored by those who condemn
what was done in fact" (*) 

The alternative is a fair trial before an impartial court under existing
procedures and proper rules of evidence. 

FOOTNOTES: 

(*) "The Legality of the Trials", in "Trials at Nuremberg", History of the
Second World War, Volume 8, No. 7 3/6, Purnell & Sons, 1969. 

(**) Dum dum bullets, first manufactured by the British at Dum Dum, India,
are of advantage only in jungle warfare against primitive tribes, where the
danger is of sudden rushes of large numbers at close quarters. They are not
used in European warfare because they are inaccurate and tend to foul guns.
If they offered an advantage, they would be used regardless of any treaty. 

Back to Top of Page

------------------------------------------------------------------------
CODOH can be reached at: 
Post Office Box 3267 
Visalia CA 93278 

Email: CODOHmail@aol.com 

Back to Main Index 



From cwporter@tornado.be Wed Jan 21 12:12:32 EST 1998
Article: 160603 of alt.revisionism
From: "CARLOS W. PORTER" 
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: holocaust museum of stupidity
Date: 12 Jan 1998 13:40:08 GMT
Organization: Tornado News Processing System
Lines: 99
Message-ID: <01bd1f51$01c5e380$065795c2@default>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.149.87.6
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161
Path: news.trends.ca!ftn.hub.org!hub.org!vncnews!HSNX.wco.com!jupiter.dnai.com!ultra.sonic.net!uunet!in3.uu.net!nntp.ntr.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!atl-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.planetc.com!tornix.tornado.be!not-for-mail
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.revisionism:160603


HOLOCAUST MUSEUM OF STUPIDITY
Now Opening at a Location Near You 



[On 5 December 1997, the court rejected the defendant's defence of
justified absence due to pedal-driven brain-bashing machine induced
injuries, partly on the grounds that he had failed to specify the exact
date of his injury! How stupid can you get? He was given one week in which
to object, in German.]
 



TRANSLATION OF JUDGEMENT OF 5 DECEMBER 1997
18 Ns 112 Js 116737/96
Regarding: Criminal proceedings against Porter, Carlos
For incitement to racial hatred

[Short excerpts only]


…[The defendant] stated that he had been unable to attend the main trial on
10 October 1997 due to "severe cranial injuries and concussion". With
regards to the other statements, reference is made to the letter of the
defendant dated 5 November 1997, which was translated. 
[This means: the letter of 7 November will be ignored.]


[…etc., etc., blah, blah, blah.]

…The mere assertion of severe cranial injuries and concussion is
insufficient to constitute justified failure to appear. Because there is no
indication of the date [!!!]. In addition, the claim was not substantiated
[!].
The doctor's certificate mentioned by the accused in his letter of
05.11.1997, was not presented [!]. Nor was this failure made good in the
letter
of the defendant dated 7.11.1997 in which the accused stated that he had 
recovered from his cranial injuries [!]. Furthermore, the accused, in his
letter to the court dated 1 September 1997, had [already] stated at length
that he
would refuse to appear. [OK; so why bother with the trial?]

[…etc., etc., blah, blah, blah.]

Kunert

Presiding Judge
Regional Court
[certified true copy, etc., etc.]


[The defendant was then given one week in which to protest the rejection of
his defence of justified absence due to pedal-driven brain-bashing machine
induced injuries.]

…The objection must be in German.]

---

OBJECTION [by fax on 5 January 1997]

Judge Kunert,

[address, references, etc.]

Es ist mein Pflicht, Ihnen mitzuteilen , dass, indem Sie die
Glaubwuerdigkeit meiner durch die in dem Nuernbergerprozess beschriebenen
(IMT VII 377 [416-417]) Pedal-angetriebene Gehirnzertruemmerungsmachine
verursachten Kopfverletzungen anzweifeln bzw leugnen, Sie mich in meiner
Menchenwuerde verletzen, was mir ganz schwere psychische und Gefuehlsleiden
verursachen muss. Ich fuehle mich herabwuerdigt und beleidigt. Sie werden
von meinem Rechtsanwalt hoeren. Im uebrigens, wuerde ich am 9. Oktober
schwer verbrannt durch Ausstrahlungen von deutschen Atomwaffen aus dem
Zweiten Weltkrieg [IMT XVI 529-530 [580]) und bin immer noch radioactiv.

Carlos W. Porter

 [translation]

It is my duty to inform you that in disputing or denying the credibility of
my cranial injuries caused by the pedal-driven brain-basing machine
described in the Nuremberg Trial transcript [IMT VII 377 [416-417] you
injure my dignity as a human being, causing me serious psychic disturbances
and emotional anguish. I feel humiliated and insulted. You will be hearing
>from  my lawyer about this. I also suffered severe radiation burns on 9
October 1997 while handling the German World War II atomic bomb described
in the Nuremberg trial transcript [IMT XVI 529-530 [580]) and am still
radioactive.

Carlos W. Porter

[to be continued]

Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor