From cook@dowco.com Tue Jun 11 20:54:26 PDT 1996 Article: 46929 of bc.general Newsgroups: bc.general Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news2.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!news.bc.net!news.dowco.com!ppp34.dowco.com!user From: cook@dowco.com (Cook) Subject: Re: ICBC...are they mad? Or do they just lie alot? Sender: news@dowco.com Message-ID:Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1996 06:05:57 GMT References: Nntp-Posting-Host: ppp34.dowco.com Organization: N/A X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.1.8 Lines: 40 In article , hollyr@dowco.com (Holly Rivers) wrote: > This driver was making a left turn and was passed on his left and struck > by another car who crossed a double solid yellow line to do so! > -------ICBC says this driver is 25% at fault?!-------- > Why? This will not affect ths drivers insurance premiums or cost him any money. > What is the point ICBC? Are you just trying to insult us for allowing > your existance. > The statement given to ICBC follows... > > I WAS TRAVELING WESTBOUND ON NORTHWEST MARINE DRIVE. > THERE WERE FOUR PASSENGERS IN MY CAR BESIDES MYSELF. > TWO ADULT FEMALES ONE INFANT IN A CAR SEAT AND ONE FIVE YEAR OLD > CHILD BOTH MALE. THIS IS A ONE LANE ROAD EACH WAY SEPARATED > BY A SOLID DOUBLE YELLOW LINE. I HAD HAD SIGNALED A LEFT TURN > BEFORE THE 5500 BLOCK NORTHWEST MARINE. > I WAS SLOWED TO MAKE THE LEFT TURN AT THE END OF THE > SOLID DOUBLE YELLOW LINE. I OBSERVED A DARK CAR APPROACHING FAST > FROM MY REAR . I CONTINUED WITH MY TURN. > I OBSERVED THE SAME CAR IN MY DRIVERS SIDE MIRROR AS IT SUDDENLY > SWERVED FROM MY REAR AND BEGAN TO PASS. I SLAMMED ON MY BRAKES. > I WAS AT A COMPLETE STOP WHEN THE FRONT RIGHT CORNER OF MY > VEHICLE WAS STRUCK. I HAD MY LAP AND SHOULDER SEATBELT ON. > MY CAR WAS STILL DRIVEABLE AND I MOVED IT OFF OF NORTHWEST MARINE DRIVE. > WHILE I CHECKED ON THE CONDITION OF THE OCCUPANTS OF MY CAR THE YOUNG > MALE WHO WAS THE DRIVER OF THE OTHER VEHICLE GOT OUT OF HIS VEHICLE > WHICH WAS PLAYING LOUD MUSIC. HE APOLOGIZED EXPRESSING CONCERN FOR THE > OCCUPANTS OF MY CAR AND EXPLAINED THAT THE ACCIDENT WAS HIS FAULT. > WE EXCHANGED INFORMATION. I DID NOT SEE IF HE WAS WEARING HIS > SEATBELT. MY WIFE COMPLAINED OF A SORE NECK IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE > INCIDENT AND FOR THAT NIGHT BUT HAS HAD NO SIGNIFICANT PAIN SINCE. > SHE DID NOT SEEK MEDICAL ATTENTION. THERE WERE NO OTHER INJURIES. snip If the accident happened as you describe, how on earth did he hit your RIGHT front? I assume you mean left front. -- cook From cook@dowco.com Tue Jun 18 11:25:40 PDT 1996 Article: 47212 of bc.general Newsgroups: can.general,can.politics,misc.immigration.canada,bc.general,ont.general,qc.general,soc.culture.canada,soc.culture.hongkong,soc.culture.somalia,soc.culture.china,soc.culture.korean,soc.culture.caribbean,soc.culture.filipino,soc.culture.pakistan,soc.culture.taiwan,soc.culture.african Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!hookup!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.dacom.co.kr!bofh.dot!usenet.seri.re.kr!bofh.dot!news.cais.net!van-bc!news.mindlink.net!news.bc.net!news.dowco.com!ppp48.dowco.com!user From: cook@dowco.com (Cook) Subject: Re: Canadians DONT want Immigration Sender: news@dowco.com Message-ID: Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 07:22:51 GMT References: <063353Z06061996@anon.penet.fi> <4pj09m$3pe@apollo.isisnet.com> <4pkfpr$2k1@news.inforamp.net> <4pmlc9$9t8_001@popsie.uwaterloo.ca> Nntp-Posting-Host: ppp48.dowco.com Organization: N/A X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.1.8 Lines: 29 Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca can.general:80401 can.politics:52682 misc.immigration.canada:7587 bc.general:47212 ont.general:43210 qc.general:7689 soc.culture.canada:90868 soc.culture.hongkong:93784 soc.culture.somalia:7398 soc.culture.china:125886 soc.culture.korean:51367 soc.culture.caribbean:15287 soc.culture.filipino:49969 soc.culture.pakistan:80291 soc.culture.taiwan:72309 soc.culture.african:37800 In article , Charles Abbott wrote: > > I recently read Peter Brimelow's _Alien Nation_ (which is about > immigration into America) and have developed a much more mixed attitude > toward immigration that I used to have (which was almost unconditionally > in favor of it). > > I still don't oppose it, but my view is now more nuanced. The book is > worthwhile. It's got tons of notes, good graphics, good summaries of > what various experts think and what their underlying assumptions are. I > was ignoring the book until it got a review in London _economist_ which > compared reading the book to having an boorish cocktail party guest who > is loud, annoying, and frequently right! > > Take a look at the book. Your local library should have it. It's > american based, but the theory is probably useful to someone in any > immigration receiving country. > If the book takes anything like a rational approach to immigration, you can be sure the pro-immigration lobby will have it banned. Your recommendation of the book ensures it will never sees the light of day in any Canadian library. -- cook
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.