Archive/File: holocaust/deniers wmm.1294 Last-Modified: 1994/10/29 Article 20044 of alt.revisionism: Path: oneb!hakatac!news.bc.net!news.mic.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!swiss.ans.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf01.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Wm Michael) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: The Top Ten Net Mythologists Date: 14 Dec 1994 20:05:29 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 30 Sender: email@example.com Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> References: <12DEC94.11353106.0082@UNBVM1.CSD.UNB.CA> NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf01.news.aol.com In article <12DEC94.11353106.0082@UNBVM1.CSD.UNB.CA>, Keith Morrison
writes: >I think that this indicates the honesty (or lack thereof) inherent in the Official Milton J. Kleim Jr. Poll of People He Does Not Like. The eye Weekly poll did not hide the fact that anti-revisionists were polled, so I do not think Miltie need try to give his poll an aura of greater respectibility by claiming that revisionists AND lurkers of all viewpoints were polled since that is obviously impossible for the reasons I have outlined above.< >As to the final evaluation of the alleged poll, the results are somewhat ambiguous. Did Ken McVay and Danny Keren finish so low because of their effectiveness in destroying revisionist arguments? Why did Miltie apparently lie when he could have just stated that this was his own personal view on how we ranked? And why is Mike Stein so damn popular? First McGuire then Miltie. I bet you're just underwhelmed there, Mike.< Well, I for one received Milton's request to rank the "net mythologists", and I recall that it had a lot of "To:s" and "cc:s". And, yes I sent mine in. So I know that he received some replies. Why disparage someone for what the exterminationists did themselves? Perhaps you should look in the mirror once in awhile, and repeat "I will be truthful."
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Home · Site Map · What's New? · Search Nizkor