From email@example.com Wed Oct 9 14:04:10 PDT 1996 Article: 72911 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!nntp.portal.ca!news.mindlink.net!uniserve!news.sol.net!newspump.sol.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!xmission!news From: firstname.lastname@example.org Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.revisionism Subject: Re: The Holocaust-What a scam! Date: Wed, 09 Oct 1996 18:18:29 GMT Organization: XMission Internet (801 539 0900) Lines: 57 Message-ID: <email@example.com> References: <3258957C.firstname.lastname@example.org> <3259F001.5FE2@area51.ufo> NNTP-Posting-Host: rippers.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.conspiracy:97313 alt.revisionism:72911 "Death!"
wrote: >Lee Newton wrote: >> >> The so-called holocaust is one of the biggest scams in the history >> of the world. It NEVER happened. The only thing that did happen >> is that a bunch of jews have gotten lots of money from >> lots of slimy politicians. >About ten years ago I met an old jewish woman with a blue >concentration camp tatto on her upper-right arm. I guess >your telling me the internation Zionist conspiracy placed >her in my neighborhood for viewing purposes after a quick >tatto job. You know.... for years now, I've read that it happend, and for years, I've read it was a hoax. both sides continue to bicker and flame one another, but there is one question that never seems to come up, that I read a report on last year... WHY?????? Many say it DID happen, just as the victor of the war wrote the history about it, and even THEY do not say "WHY". No one ever says, "Sure, the Nazis gassed millions," BUT that same person never says tells us why... what did the Jews do to piss off the Nazis so bad? Would anyone care to take a guess before I post that report? Would you walk down the street punching people in the face for no reason at all? Or would you wait until you were stabbed in the back or pushed in some other way, before you start swinging your fists? History always fails to remind us that it was the Zionist Jews who took over Christian Russia in the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, and formed the Russian Communist Party, and committed Genocide against Christians and others, 10 fold of what the Nazis ever killed. To be "anti-Semite" is to be against a HEBREW JEW, But the Zionist run Untited States (Socialist Democrats), brainwashed everone to think that ALL Jews are Hebrew, but by the definition of the Jewish Encyclopedia, a "true" Jew is a very very small percent of the worlds Jews, the rest of them are the false Jews, that Jesus warned about. Who cares if it happened or not, what is important is WHY!!!!! From email@example.com Thu Oct 10 13:58:37 PDT 1996 Article: 73076 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!nic.wat.hookup.net!hookup!news.nstn.ca!coranto.ucs.mun.ca!news.unb.ca!news.uoregon.edu!xmission!news From: firstname.lastname@example.org Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.revisionism Subject: Invalidity of the term "Anti-Semitism" Date: Thu, 10 Oct 1996 19:58:47 GMT Organization: XMission Internet (801 539 0900) Lines: 234 Message-ID: <email@example.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: rippers.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.conspiracy:97672 alt.revisionism:73076 CITIZEN'S PERSPECTIVE September, 1995 KHAZARS; AND THE INVALIDITY OF THE TERM 'ANTI-SEMITISM' By Rex Weeks NOTE: For those of you reading the information on the METRO organization, you will need to understand the following history to grasp the big picture. You may have noticed the term "Khazar" or "Khazarian Zionists" popping up more frequently in articles. Many of you know who and what this term refers to (especially CONTACT readers), but for those who don't, you are about to get a short lesson in history which is most pertinent to events that have led up to the "One World Order". The following information is from several Jewish historians, scholars, and encyclopedic sources. Because of the direct connection with "Khazars" and Jewish people today, I feel it is important to use Jewish sources for this information. To understand past and present world political events, we need to understand this history. The kingdom of the Khazars may have vanished from the maps of today, but their affect and influence are still acutely felt. In the fist millennia A.D. a warlike, pagan tribe of people were driven westward from Central Asia (see Ancient Russia, by George Vernadsky). They settled in an area of what is now Southern Russia between the Black and Caspian Seas. This was an area just beyond the boundaries of both the Roman and Byzantine Empires. These people were called _Khazars_ (or Chazars) and were a tribe of Mongol, Turkish and Nordic bloodlines. Throughout the centuries, this warring tribe became the most powerful in Asia. As early as 3 A.D. they were indentifiable in constant warfare in Persia and Armenia. They fought alongside Attila the Hun around 5 A.D. They were at the peak of power between the seventh and tenth centuries A.D. The Khazars were strategically situated at the mouth of the Volga River, surrounded by the Caucasus mountains to the south, the Black Sea to the west, and the Khazar Sea (now Caspian Sea) to the east. They occupied a strategic key position in the vital gateway between the Seas where the great eastern powers of the period confronted each other (The Thirteenth Tribe, by Arthur Koestler, Jewish historian). Khazars were not only expert warriors, but aggressive merchants. At the peak of their power, they exacted a "tribute" (tax, extortion) of 10 percent from all traders who had to pass through their dominion. This made them a wealthy, but despised nation. By the eighth century, their kingdom extended as far north as Kiev, Russia. At its peak, it encompassed one million square miles. for three of four centuries it was an untouchable empire. How many of you have ever heard of the Khazarian Empire? In the eighth century (740 A.D.) something of _historic profoundness_ occurred in this kingdom. the Khazarian king (Kagan/Khan, Khakan or Chagan), having no religion for the kingdom beyond pagan phallic/idolatry worship, was getting pressure from the surrounding Christian Byzantine and Moslem empires to convert. According to the _Universal Jewish Encyclopedia_, the Khazar chieftain Bulan, "called representatives of Judaism, Christianity, and Mohammedism to expound their doctrines before him". Not wanting to associate himself with either side, so as not to incur the wrath (hence, a potential alliance of war) against them, King Bulan _chose as the nations religion, Talmudism_, now known as JUDAISM (and formally known as Pharisaism). It was now a state religion. ("Facts are Facts", by Benjamin Freedman, Jewish author and historian in a letter to Dr. David Goldstein). From the king's conversion to "Judaism" (we'll use the current vernacular), it was spread to the subjects of the land, especially by one of Bulan's successors, Obadiah. By the tenth century the ruler of Christian Russia, Vladimir III had conquered the Khazarian empire. but this is not the end of the story. In fact, it is only the beginning. Before going on, reflect on what happened here. Purely as a political decision, the Khazar kingdom became Jews en masse (although remember, the term "Jew" did not exist at that time; Khazaria was called, "Land of the Judahites"). As Jewish historian Benjamin Freedman put it, "The converted Khazars were the first population of so called or self-styled (terms from the _Jewish Encyclopedia_) "Jews" in eastern Europe. So-called or self-styled "Jews" in eastern Europe after the conversion of the conversion of the Khazars _are the descendants of the Khazars converted to "Talmudism", or as it is now known "Judaism", by the 7th century mass conversion of the Khazar population_", end quote. Are you beginning to grasp the historical significance of the conversion to Talmudism/Judaism by the Khazars? These historians have determined that the "Jews" of southern Russia and eastern Europe are the Khazarian descendants of self-chosen converts, _having nothing to do with Biblical Hebrews yet laying claim to their heritage. Ponder on this a moment. For further reference, let's take a quote from the _Jewish Encyclopedia_, Vol. IV, pages 1-5 on "Chazars" (pronounced like cos(tume)Czar. From the _Jewish Encyclopedia_: quoting: "Chazars: A people of Turkish origin whose life and history are interwoven with _THE VERY BEGINNINGS OF THE HISTORY OF THE JEWS IN RUSSIA_... driven on by nomadic tribes of the steppes and by their own desire for plunder and revenge...The kingdom of the Chazars was firmly established in _most of south Russia long before the foundation of the Russian monarchy by the Varangians_ (Russians)...The Kingdom of the chazars was constantly at war...At the end of the eighth century...the chagan (king) of the Chazars _TOGETHER WITH A LARGE NUMBER OF HIS HEATHEN PEOPLE, EMBRACED THE JEWISH RELIGION_...The Jewish population in the entire domain of the chazars, in the period between the seventh and tenth centuries, _must have been considerable_...about the ninth century, _IT APPEARS AS IF ALL THE CHAZARS WERE JEWS AND THAT THEY HAD BEEN CONVERTED TO JUDASM ONLY A SHORT TIME BEFORE_...the people were instructed in the Bible, Mishnah and the _TALMUD_...In their writings the _Chazars used Hebrew letters_ (applied to the phonetics of Asiatic dialects)... The Russian varangians established themselves at Kiev.. .until the final conquest of the chazars by the Russians...Many members of the chazarian royal family emigrated to Spain...Some went to Hungary, _BUT THE GREAT MASS OF THE PEOPLE REMAINED IN THEIR NATIVE COUNTRY." (end quote). Jewish historian, Professor H. Graetz, points out in his famous "_History of the Jews_" that when other so called or self-styled "Jews" in other countries heard about the Jewish Khazar kingdom, they mistakenly believed the Khazars were one of the "lost ten tribes". As you can see from the history above, this is the furthest thing from the truth, hence the name of Arthur Koestler's book, "The _Thirteenth_ Tribe" (indicating they were not one of the original 12 tribes of Israel). The Khazars took the Hebrew characters they say in the Babylonian Talmud and applied them to the phonetics of the German, Russian, Turkish and other dialects around them. This hybrid language was known as _Yiddish_. Even with the disbandment of the Khazars, their language of Yiddish survived and still today forms a common bond between the people. After their conquering, the Khazars of southern Russia stayed in the area for the most part, spreading to the areas now known as eastern Europe - Poland, Germany, Hungary - and made up the eastern European "Jewry". From generation to generation they also passed down a militant tradition known as _ZIONISM_ - the belief that they were a chosen people and divinely ordained to have a homeland of their own, at any cost. As the eminent Rabbi Louis Finkelstein said, "Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Rabinism", which became Judaism, which became Zionism. Rabbi Adolph Moses States, "Among the innumerable misfortunes which have befallen...the most fatal in its consequences is the name _Judaism_...Worse still, the Jews themselves, who have gradually come to call their religion Judaism..." As you can see, the Khazars were _NOT_ and are not the Biblical Hebrew Judaists, but _claimed_ to be so as time went on. This reasoning gave them (Khazarian Zionists) eventual justification for establishing "Israel"; but one must ask if the killing of men, women and children or forcing over half a million Palestinian Arabs (and Christians) out of there homes to create a state is the "will of God"? This is the Khazarian mentality. When the Khazarian empire broke up through the tenth and twelfth centuries, they migrated to become the "Jewry" of eastern Europe (Germany, Poland, Hungary) as well as the Jewry of southern Russia and the "Pale of Settlement". This is an _EXTREMELY VITAL POINT_ to remember and will be expounded upon in a subsequent article. Jewish historian Benjamin Freedman states: "The so-called or self-styled "Jews" throughout the world today of eastern European origin _MAKE UP AT LEAST 90 PERCENT OF THE WORLD'S TOTAL PRESENT POPULATION OF SO-CALLED OR SELF-STYLED "JEWS."_ The modern Jewry (Khazars) that run "Israel" and make up most eastern European and Russian Jews are the "_Ashkenazi_" Jews (as opposed to Sephardic, Oriental or Ethiopian/black Jews). the word "Ashkenazi" is derived from "_Ashkenaz". This goes back to the days of Noah who had three sons, Japheth, Sem (Shem), and Ham. _UNDERSTAND THE FOLLOWING CAREFULLY_: we have all heard the term "anti-semite". The derivation is from Noah's son Sem, hence "Semites" - all who are descended from Sem; so presumable an "anti-Semite" is one who is racist or prejudiced against a "Semite". Fine. but Noah's other son named Japheth, had a son named Gomer, who had a son named _ASHKENAZ!_ The truth is that the "Ashkenazi Jews" _ARE NOT SEMITES_, but are named after JAPHETH'S grandson, _Ashkenaz_. the people of Ashkenaz, according to Biblical concordances, lived in the _area of the Black and Caspian Seas!_. This is also an area populated by the Canaanites, who descended from Noah's son Ham. The people of this area are _not_ _Semites_!. You can see that the slur of "anti-semite" has no validity whatsoever. It would be a _non-semite_ accusing another of being an "anti-semite". It is illogical. In fact the _accuser_ is the anti- semite in reality. I am not saying racism against Jews doesn't exist, but the intended context of the "anti-semite" label is based on a totally false premise. The term "anti-semite" was first used in 1880 for the purpose of spreading the idea that as Christ was a "Semite", it was un-Christian to oppose the activities of the people (Semites) through whom He came to us. this applies only to _Semites_. You can see the pertinence of this information today. The Khazarian/Ashkenazi/Zionist _elite_ who claim to be true Judeans but aren't, are those such as the Rockefellers, Rothschilds, and the Warburgs of the international banking scene; the British Israeli Zionists that make up the core of the Committee of 300 and Crown of England; the Anti-Defamation League who, in concert with the _Metro_ organization (Rockefeller, Carnegie, and Ford Foundation supported) runs the IMF, World Bank, Federal Reserve, and is implementing administrative, social legislation (unconstitutional) through the National Governors Association, Council of State Governments and the United Nations; all run by the same faction of Khazarians! The Khazarians/Ashkenazi/Zionists are in control of Israeli government, international banking, and all the various national and world Jewish Congresses and Committees. Just ask any _Sephardic_ Jew how much of a role they play in governmental affairs. In Israel they are treated as second-class citizens _by the Khazarian Ashkenazi Zionist Jews_! A few personal notes here. Please don't misconstrue my intentions with this article. I have no connection with any white supremacist type organization or any such group of ignorant, foolish racists and bigots. I am not implicating all, or even most, Jewish people with this information. As a matter of fact, this information is more for the millions of good and godly Jewish people in the world than for anyone else. All Jewish people everywhere need to realize _who stole the Judean's heritage and why_, because it is the true Jews and the Godly Jews that have always been sacrificed at the alter of the Khazarians. these few power-seeking bad apples spoil the whole bunch and its time for the "true Jews" to see it and speak out. In fact, many have. Such truthful men as the Jewish authors presented above have tried to reveal the truth to people, as well as those such as Rabbi Elmir Berger, Rabbi Louis Joel Teitelbaum and many other Jewish scholars. Again _all_ the above information is from Jewish historians and scholars. In the above article we are talking about a _specific_ group of evil men who are trying to control the world's wealth, minds and ultimately, souls. The Khazarian/Ashkenazi/Zionist _elite_ leaders are the anti-god/anti-Christ force of the world. The "adversary" energy (by whatever name) must have physical beings to work through and _they are it_. They are the destroyers and the testers of humanity. They have done their job well, indeed. But the world they have ensnared in their web of deceit and lies is now fully exposed. They know the game is over, but will certainly fight to the very end. So be it. Creator's troops of light and truth are here once again and are now prevailing. recall _Revelations_ 3:9; "To those who are of the synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews though they are not..." KHAZARS! METRO, IMF, WORLD BANK, CSG, BIS, IRS, U.N., FEDERAL RESERVE, GOVERNORS ASSOC., ONE WORLD ORDER ------------------------- SOURCES; 1: The Thirteenth Tribe, by Arthur Koestler 2: The Garden of Aton, by Nora Boyles 3: A History of Russia, by Nicholas Rissanovsky 4: Facts are Facts, by Benjamin Freedman 5: The Iron Curtain Over America, by John Beaty ----------------------------------------- From firstname.lastname@example.org Thu Oct 10 13:58:39 PDT 1996 Article: 73077 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!nic.wat.hookup.net!hookup!news.nstn.ca!coranto.ucs.mun.ca!news.unb.ca!news.uoregon.edu!xmission!news From: email@example.com Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.revisionism Subject: Zionism and the Bolshevik Revolution Date: Thu, 10 Oct 1996 19:59:05 GMT Organization: XMission Internet (801 539 0900) Lines: 336 Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> References: <3258957C.email@example.com> <3259F001.5FE2@area51.ufo> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: rippers.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.conspiracy:97673 alt.revisionism:73077 CITIZEN'S PERSPECTIVE Sept. 30, 1995 KHAZARS, COMMUNISM/BOLSHEVISM By Rex Weeks Please keep in mind with this series of articles on Khazarian self- chosen Jews that there is no intent whatsoever to insult or denigrate all Jews worldwide. The fact is that we are talking about a small, specific faction of world-domination thinking "Jews" who have stolen the Hebrew Judaists heritage and use it for their own gain. I honor all Jewish seekers of truth who see this light because you are the most affected by this evil ploy. In the last article on the history of the Khazars of southern Russia, we learned that this powerful warrior/merchant/pagan tribe became "Jews" (Judahites) as a political decision in 740 A.D., according to the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. They had, and still have, no connection at all to the Biblical Hebrew Judaists. They had build a despotic empire by brutal warfare and in part through their extraction of a 10 percent "toll" (tax) on all traders passing through their lands, with the penalty of death for those who would resist. Around 862 A.D., a _Rus_, (or "Varangian" of Nordic/Viking origin) leader from the north and west named Rurik founded the city of Novgorod, and _Russia_ was born. Some of these "Russians" settled in areas of Khazar territory and warfare ensued. In 989 A.D., Russia's leader, Vladimir of Kiev, embraced Christianity, as did the populace. Russia became a Christian nation and was so until the Bolshevik Revolution. Lets see how that came about. Around 1016, the Russian forces defeated the Khazars, and their kingdom was finished. Many Khazarians, who now called themselves "Jews", stayed in their old homeland area of southern Russia, but others "migrated to Kiev and other parts of Russia" (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VI, pg 377). Many moved to the areas now known as eastern Europe (Poland, Lithuania, Hungary, Germany). In 1240 in Kiev, "The Jewish community was uprooted, its surviving members finding refuge in towns further west" (Univ Jewish Encyl.Vol VI pg 382). With the third partition of Poland in 1793, Russia acquired the world's largest 'Jewish' (Khazarian) population, which would eventually contribute to their downfall. Understand the situation here. You have a Khazarian people who are now self-chosen 'Jews' (not Biblical Judaists) following the _Babylonian Talmud_, who were just conquered by a Christian Russian people. The Judaized Khazars held deep ideological resentment against their new Christian rulers which set the stage for future war against the Russians. The Khazarians 'Jews' were determined not to be Russianized or Christianized. Under Christian Tsarist Russia, most Jews (Khazarians) were relegated to a specific area of southern/western Russia called the "Pale of Settlement". In 1897, the year of Russia's first census, 93.6 percent of Russian Khazarian 'Jews' lived in the 'Pale'. It was in the Pale period when many Jewish/Khazarian radicals fomented the plot to finally overthrow their age old enemy, the Christian Russians, through their movements of Zionism and Bolshevism! Feeling a possible kinship, many were also students of Karl Marx, the Jewish author/revolutionary. Eventually, every Russian 'Jew'/Khazarian came to identify themselves with one of the three movements above. In the early 1800's, Alexander II attempted to have the Jew/Khazars assimilate into the Russian community. They were now permitted into the universities and to hold professional and governmental positions. While this provided opportunity for the law-abiding Jewish citizen, it also opened the "Pandora's Box" of Jewish/Khazarians anti-government radicals. Tsar Alexander II lost considerable enthusiasm for the liberal "Jewish" policy when an assassination attempt was made on his life in 1866. Another attempt was made again in 1879. Finally, in 1881, a plot was hatched at the home of Hesia Helfman (Jewish/Khazar), and the Tsar was killed. Much unrest and rioting occurred thereafter. In 1882, the Russian "May Laws" were passed in an attempt to stem the tide of both Jewish/Khazarian exploitation of people and the anti-Jewish reaction to this. Under Nicholas II there was no abatement of the regulations, after the murder of Alexander II, to curb the anti-government activities of the Jews; consequently, the "reaction to those excesses was Jewish support of the Bolsheviks" (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. I, pg. 286). The Russian Empire was in social and economic turmoil. Desperate for money, the Russian minister turned to the banking house of Rothchild (Khazarian financier). Once the loans were made, Rothschild informed them that unless the Jewish persecution stopped, no more money would be forthcoming. This set the stage for even further unrest. In 1900, the Jewish dominated Social Revolutionary Party was responsible for the assassination of no less than six ranking members of the Imperial government. It's chief was the Khazarian Jew, Gershuni, along with Yevno Azev, son of a Jewish tailor. "Bloody Sunday" marked the beginning of the 1905 Revolution. The Jewish Khazarian Marxists were joined by the working class. This was the real beginning of the Jewish dominated revolution in Russia. This year also marked the return of Lenin from his Siberian exile. Several political parties were formed in the subsequent years leading up to the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution. There was the workers union, The Jewish General Workers Union, or Bund, the Mensheviks, a predominantly Jewish group, and the Bolsheviks. The leaders of these groups made up the Petersburg _Soviet_, led by such Jews as Zborovski, Nosar and Trotsky (real name Bronstein). With the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, the Khazarian Jewish/Marxists of the Bolshevik/Communist Party had finally achieved the overthrow of their Christian Russian rulers. One of the first acts of the Provisional Government was to bring back to Russia the political victims of the tsarist government who had either fled or been exiled. Among the _ninety thousand_ exiles (almost all professional revolutionaries) most were Jewish, with the few exceptions. Returning to Russia were men such as Lenin (again), Stalin, Kamenev, Martov, Radek (Sobelsohn, who was head of the Soviet Russian Atheist Party), Sverdlov and others. These were _all_ Jewish/Khazarian radicals, including Lenin. The Petersburg Soviet was initially Menshevik dominated but was soon taken over by the Bolsheviks, who in 1918 changed their name to the _Communist Party_. There power was consolidated by the merging of the Jewish Bund. To see the Jewish/Khazarian influence in the Bolshevik takeover of Russia, let's take a look at some statistics relating to the members of the Communist organizations that formed the core of the Revolution. Some of the following is from Robert Wilton, Russian correspondent of _The Times_. The list of names of the Communist/Bolshevik/Khazarian rulers of the Revolution are as follows: The Central Committee of the Extraordinary Commission and the Council of Commissars, of the 62 members; 5 Russians, 1 Ukrainian, 6 Letts, 2 Germans, 1 Czech, 2 Armenians, 3 Georgians, 1 Karaim (Jewish sect), 41 Jews. The Extraordinary Commission of Moscow; of 36 members; 1 German, 1 Pole, 1 Armenian, 2 Russians, 8 Letts, 23 Jews. The Council of People's Commissars; 2 Armenians, 3 Russians, 17 Jews. According to the _Soviet Press_, out of 556 important functionaries of the _Bolshevik State_, including the above, there were in 1918-1919; 17 Russians, 2 Ukrainians, 11 Armenians, 35 Letts, 15 Germans, 1 Hungarian, 10 Georgians, 3 Poles, 3 Finns, 1 Czech, 1 Karaim, and 457 JEWS. The _Central Committee of the Bolshevik/Communist Party is as follows: Bronstein (Trotsky), Apfelbaum (Zinovieff), Loured (Larine), Ourtitski, Volodarski, Rosenfeldt (Kamenev), Smidovitch, Sverdlof (Yankel), Nakhamkes (Steklof), Ulyanov (Lenin), Krylenko, Lounatcharski. All but the last two are Jews. The Central Committee of the _Menshevils_; 11 members, all Jews. Communists of the People, 6 members, 1 Russian, 5 Jews. S.R. (Right Wing), 15 members, 2 Russians, 13 Jews. S.R. (Left Wing), 12 members, 2 Russians, 10 Jews. Committee of the Anarchists of Moscow, 5 members, 1 Russian, 4 Jews. Polish Communist Party, 12 members, all Jews. Here is another breakdown of the ruling Bolshevik/Communist/Khazarians who ran the Revolution: Name (Real Name) Nationality Lenin Ulyanov Rus/Jewish Trotsky Bronstein Jewish Martoff Zederbaum Jewish Zinoviev Apfelbaum Jewish Steckloff Nakhames Jewish Kamenov Rosenfeld(t) Jewish Dan Gourevitch Jewish Ganetzky Furstenberg Jewish Parvus Helpfand Jewish Uritzky Padonilsky Jewish Larin Lurge Jewish Bohrin Nathansohn Jewish Martinoff Zibar Jewish Bogdanoff Zilberstein Jewish Garin Garfeld Jewish Suchanoff Gimel Jewish Kamnelff Goldman Jewish Sagersky Krochmann Jewish Riazanoff Goldenbach Jewish Solutezeff Bleichmann Jewish Piatnitzky Ziwin Jewish Axelrod Orthodox Jewish Glasnuoff Schultze Jewish Zuriesain Weinstein Jewish Lapinsky Loewensohn Jewish After Reading the above, there can be no question at to the role of the Khazarian Jewish Communists in the Bolshevik Revolution which overthrew Christian Russia. "Individual revolutionary leaders of Jewish origin - such as Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamemev, and Sverdlov - played a conspicuous part in the revolution of November, 1917. which enabled the Bolshevists to take possession of the state apparatus" - Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol IX, pg. 668 The Jewish writer, M. Cohen in an article published in _The Communist_ (a Soviet paper), wrote: "The Great Russian revolution was indeed accomplished by the hands of the Jews. There are no Jews in the ranks of the red Army as far as _privates_ are concerned, but in the Committees (Soviet), and the Soviet organization as Commissars, the Jews are gallantly leading the masses. The symbol of Jewry has become the symbol of the Russian proletariat, which can be seen in the fact of the adoption of the five-pointed star, which in former times was the symbol of Zionism and Jewry." The battle in Russia then, and _now_, is an age old conflict between the Khazarian Communist Ashkenazi Bolshevik "Jew" and the Christian Russia. The battle wages on today. The ramifications of the Bolshevik takeover of Russia were dire. Estimates are that anywhere from 30 to 80 million Christians (60 million according to Soltzchenytsin) were killed at the hands of the atheistic Khazarian Communist Bolshevik "Jews". This included millions of Jews themselves who were sacrificed at the Khazarian alter of blood. This Christian Holocaust is one you never hear of and is one of the most horrific in history. The Khazarians will not hesitate to sacrifice even their "own" (or especially true Jews). to understand the treason and treachery of the Khazarian Communist Zionist, you need to see how they aided and abetted the Russian Revolution (and Nazi Germany) through financial support. During the Bolshevik Revolution, the Khazarian Jewish banker, Jacob Schiff (who helped establish the Federal Reserve) helped to send Trotsky to Russia with a support of $20 million dollars! As evidence of Jacob Schiff's "settlement in Russia" effort, we have the following letter from the _German Imperial Bank of Stockholm_; "Dear Comrade; In conformity with a telegram from the Westphalian Rhineland Syndicate, Max Warburg & Co.'s Bank informs you that an account is opened to Comrade _Trotsky's_ enterprise. I. Furstenburg." At the time, the Jewish bankers, the Warburgs (Max, Felix and Paul) were co-directors with Jacob Schiff of the New York Banking House of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. The _American Civil Servant Document_ 65th Congress, 3rd Session, contains the following: "It was found that the following persons, as well as the banking house mentioned, were engaged in these work of destruction (meaning the subsidizing of Russian revolutionaries); Jacob Schiff, Guggenheim, Max Breitung, Kuhn Loeb & Co., Felix Warburg, Otto Kahn, Mortimer Schiff, and S.J. Hanauer." (all Khazarians). This was also evidenced in Nazi Germany where Khazarian Ashkenazi (Jewish power brokers were involved in financial dealings with the Germans. Rockefeller of Standard Oil (in conjunction with I.G. Farben) supplied Germany before and during the war. I.G. Farben in fact had plants ( 'buna' rubber) inside some of the concentration/ labor camps. I.G. Farben had over a half dozen Jews (Ashkenazi) on their board. At the Nuremburg Trials, evidence was given connecting the Warburg banking house with Hitler. The following testimony was given by the widow of General Ludendorff: "As early as the summer of 1929, James P. Warburg had undertaken and assignment from financial circles in America which desired to exercise solitary influence on Germany in the unleashing of a national revolution. Warburg's task was to find the suitable man in Germany (Hitler), who subsequently received sums of money amounting to 27 million dollars up to January 30, 1933, and still another seven million thereafter, enabling him to finance his movement." The London Jewish Chronicle of Jan. 6, 1933 reported, "Over one-third of the Jews in Russia have become officials." The "Jewish" nature of the Bolshevik Revolution was not lost on some international leaders. That the Revolution was plotted, organized, financed and managed by "Jews" (Khazarians) was further revealed by Winston Churchill in the following statement: "There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international atheistic Jews. The Majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. In the Soviet institutions the prominence of Jews is even more astonishing..." Churchill again, in the "_Sunday Herald_" of 8-2-20 wrote; "I deal here with the schemes of the International Jew...This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus- Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemberg (Germany), Emma Goldman (U.S.A.), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization, and for the re-construction of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing." Further confirmation is given by the "_The American Hebrew_" as follows: "The Bolshevist Revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning whose goal is to create a _new order_ in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction, and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental and physical forces, become a reality all over the world." This brief history of Russia should awaken people, most especially all good Jews, to the danger of the Khazarian Communist Zionist "Jews" in our midst. They are the "One World Order" right from the Crown of England, the British Israeli Zionists/Committee of 300, international bankers, "Metro/1313", Federal Reserve, U.N., 'state' of Israel, and British Intelligence (CIA, ADL, MI-6, etc.) ALL interconnected and _planned_ organizations, the common denominator being the _KHAZARIANS_ regardless of agency or country. I state before the eyes of God that I have true love and respect for the millions of good Jewish people of the world and for their contributions to humanity. But I have no respect for the evil, anti- Christ Khazarian Communist Zionist "false Jewish" elite who have stolen the heritage of the true Jews and use it to foment the control and destruction of our freedom; even our souls, should we allow it. It is up to those good and Godly Jews to reveal this truth to the world, and you will find the world will stand with you. References: 1: The Iron Curtain Over America, by John Beaty. 2: Behind Communism, by Frank Britton. 3: Three Who Made a Revolution, by Bertram D. Wolfe. 4: Universal Jewish Dictionary 5: Universal Jewish Encyclopedias From firstname.lastname@example.org Thu Oct 10 13:58:40 PDT 1996 Article: 73078 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!nic.wat.hookup.net!hookup!news.nstn.ca!coranto.ucs.mun.ca!news.unb.ca!news.uoregon.edu!xmission!news From: email@example.com Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.conspiracy Subject: Re: The Holocaust-What a scam! Date: Thu, 10 Oct 1996 19:59:23 GMT Organization: XMission Internet (801 539 0900) Lines: 127 Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> References: <3258957C.email@example.com> <3259F001.5FE2@area51.ufo> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <53h21m$p2j@Networking.Stanford.EDU> NNTP-Posting-Host: rippers.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.revisionism:73078 alt.conspiracy:97674 email@example.com (Rich Graves) wrote: >In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Gary Livermore > writes: >>You know.... for years now, I've read that it happend, and for years, >>I've read it was a hoax. >> >>both sides continue to bicker and flame one another, but there is one >>question that never seems to come up, that I read a report on last >>year... WHY?????? >> >>Many say it DID happen, just as the victor of the war wrote the >>history about it, and even THEY do not say "WHY". >> >>No one ever says, "Sure, the Nazis gassed millions," BUT that same >>person never says tells us why... what did the Jews do to piss off >>the Nazis so bad? Would anyone care to take a guess before I post >>that report? >> >>Would you walk down the street punching people in the face for no >>reason at all? >No, Gary, but I bet you would. Wrong again! >>Or would you wait until you were stabbed in the back >>or pushed in some other way, before you start swinging your fists? >> >>History always fails to remind us that it was the Zionist Jews who >>took over Christian Russia in the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, and >>formed the Russian Communist Party, and committed Genocide against >>Christians and others, 10 fold of what the Nazis ever killed. >History also fails to mention that Elvis is alive and well, working at a >truck stop in Fort Mojave, Arizona. Why are you interested in the story >that has less personal relevance to you? Just goes to show that YOU believe in stupid unrelated topics, I bet you even have a photo of yourself with Elvis and some aliens at the trailer.... >>To be "anti-Semite" is to be against a HEBREW JEW, But the Zionist >>run Untited States (Socialist Democrats), brainwashed everone to >>think that ALL Jews are Hebrew, but by the definition of the Jewish >>Encyclopedia, a "true" Jew is a very very small percent of the worlds >>Jews, the rest of them are the false Jews, that Jesus warned about. >I see. If everyone has been brainwashed, then how did you escape? You left >your brain behind or something? I'm not brainwashed, I still have a dirty mind! But seriously, the uninformed are anaware that they are uninformed, and you seem to fit that catagory. Now, I will post the articles (with REFERENCES), that I refered to, and you can check them if you want, although I believe that you won't bother, as that may prove you wrong! You can call it all lies WITHOUT checking the references, but if you do the later, I can only assume it is due to your lack of wanting to get to the truth of the matter. I never said the Holocaust never happened, I'm sure it DID happen, but for different reasons than just to have a big bar-b-que. I bet you don't know who the salesman was who sold the poison gas to the Nazis? Someone who (to avoid war crimes) took sancuary the Chatholic Church, stayed at the church, and is now a world-known public figure... care to guess who that person was (is)? >>Who cares if it happened or not, what is important is WHY!!!!! >I see. >David Irving, a Nazi sympathizer in Britain, spoke to this in the talk I >went to in Oakland. He agrees with Professor Goldhagen that the primary >reason the Nazis murdered millions of people is the prevalence of hate >propaganda, based mostly on lies like the above. Specifically, Mr. Irving >said that the average British soldier would not have participated in the >mass shootings of innocent people that Walter Frenz told him about, late >one night over a bottle of wine. He also worked into his talk, and into >his book, some of Goebbels' anti-Jewish propaganda, as if what Goebbels >was saying were fact. For example, Mr. Irving repeats, not only >uncritically but as a central theme of his speeches and a chapter of his >book, Goebbel's claim that Time Magazine ran a positive review of >Kaufman's kooky book advocating the sterilization of the German people. In >fact the original review, and the editorial clarification printed in the >letters section, were rather different, as anyone reading them in print or >on Nizkor would agree. Again, the above paragraph you wrote may well be just propaganda, and STILL does not address WHY the Nazi's HATED the Jews so much, enough to commit genocide.... Gotta be a reason... and I'll post it... >The reason the Holocaust happened, Gary, is that people just like you were >fed, and were willing to believe, blatant lies designed to incite >murderous hatred against innocent people. Ordinary Germans could perhaps >be excused, because they were exposed to little else; but Gary Livermore >lives in a free, democratic country with excellent libraries, and an >Internet connection to boot. For Gary Livermore to accept and spread Nazi >propaganda is in my view worse than the actions of the ordinary German >during the Holocaust. You have a choice. Wrong again... you have false information. I'll post the reasons in a post called "Reason for the Holocaust" Watch for it! READ IT COMPLETELY, and then make your comments. And while you are at it, read these posts I'll post in the same session called: Zionists and the Bolshevik Revolution . U.S. and Zionist Government Invalidity of "Anti-Semitism" These 4 topics tie each other together, and you should read ALL of them, THEN tell me it's all a pack of lies and YOU are the only one who holds the everlasting truth! and DON'T forget to post YOUR references!!!!!!! From email@example.com Thu Oct 10 14:11:32 PDT 1996 Article: 97676 of alt.conspiracy Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!nntp.portal.ca!news.mindlink.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!newspump.sol.net!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!xmission!news From: firstname.lastname@example.org Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.conspiracy Subject: WHY the Holocaust happened Date: Thu, 10 Oct 1996 20:05:50 GMT Organization: XMission Internet (801 539 0900) Lines: 509 Message-ID: <email@example.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: rippers.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.revisionism:73082 alt.conspiracy:97676 A Jewish Defector Warns America: Benjamin Freedman Speaks by Benjamin H. Freedman Introductory Note Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century. Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was at one time the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States. Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times. This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense. Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman's essential message to us -- his warning to the West -- is more urgent than ever before. -- K.A.S. HERE IN THE UNITED STATES, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government. For many reasons, too many and too complex to go into here at this time, the Zionists and their co-religionists rule these United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country. Now you may say that is a very broad statement, but let me show you what happened while we were all asleep. What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey. Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean. Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week's food supply -- and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had mutinied. They had lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting, they were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed. Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, Germany was offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: "Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started." England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that -- seriously. They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated. While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and -- I am going to be brief because it's a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make --they said: "Look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally." The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful. They told England: "We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war." In other words, they made this deal: "We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey." Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain, that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war. However, they did make that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that -- I don't know how many here remember it -- the United States, which was almost totally pro- German, entered the war as Britain's ally. I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews; and they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German because many of them had come from Germany, and also they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar. The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. These German-Jew bankers, like Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: "As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!" But they poured money into Germany, they fought beside Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime. Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like a traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies' hands. They were no good. Shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany. The Zionists in London had sent cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis, saying "Go to work on President Wilson. We're getting from England what we want. Now you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States into the war." That's how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room. There was absolutely no reason for World War I to be our war. We were railroaded into -- if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into -- that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. That is something that the people of the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War I. After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: "Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war." They didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, which was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration. The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. I don't think I could make it more emphatic than that. That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the war. The United States crushed Germany. You know what happened. When the war ended, and the Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know. Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, "Oh, so that was the game! That's why the United States came into the war." The Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered the terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost. That brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany. You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd's and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers -- the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. The Germans felt: "Well, that was quite a sellout." It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical situation: Suppose the United States was at war with the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union: "Well, let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing." And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man's imagination cannot encompass. Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How would we feel, then, in the United States against Chinese? I don't think that one of them would dare show his face on any street. There wouldn't be enough convenient lampposts to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel. Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. They'd been so nice to them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they had sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than the fact that they wanted Palestine as a so- called "Jewish commonwealth." Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you read about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923 wrote in all their papers -- and the press was filled with their statements -- that the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by Jewish intercession in bringing the United States into the war. The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious. Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said "Shema' Yisroel" or "Our Father." Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing: the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat. And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for which Germany was responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade. You must remember that Germany at the time of the French Revolution consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth. Three hundred separate little political entities. And between that time, between the times of Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And within 50 years they became one of the world's great powers. Their navy was rivalling Great Britain's, they were doing business all over the world, they could undersell anybody, they could make better products. What happened as a result of that? There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap down Germany. There isn't one historian in the world who can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically. When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine condition. They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they were filled with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had international affiliations. Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over Bavaria for a few days. Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of other Jews took over the government for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia and that he was going to meet the same fate as the Czar. So he fled to Holland for safety, for security. After the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could without hurting a single hair on anyone's head. They fought them the same way that, in this country, the Prohibitionists fought anyone who was interested in liquor. They didn't fight one another with pistols. Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews. About one half of one per cent of the population of Germany were Jews. And yet they controlled all the press, and they controlled most of the economy because they had come in with cheap money when the mark was devalued and bought up practically everything. The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that. The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They, shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could. They shunned them. The same way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat. After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world attended this meeting in July 1933. And they said to Germany: "You fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist or no matter what he was. You can't treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you." You can imagine what the Germans told them. So what did the Jews do? In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of Jews in Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer, who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference, came to the United States and went from the steamer to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he in effect said, "The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business." And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. There was just not enough food for more than one third of the population. Now in this declaration, which I have here, and which was printed in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that "this economic boycott is our means of self- defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the National Recovery Administration," which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, and which was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words "made in Germany" on it. In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted if anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany," they were picketed with signs saying "Hitler," "murderer," and so forth, something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South. At a store belonging to the R. H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked "made in Germany." Well, they were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20 years, since I've been observing women's legs for many years and it's been a long time since I've seen any cotton stockings on them. I saw Macy's boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying "murderers," "Hitlerites," and so forth. Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing. Naturally, the Germans said, "Who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and make our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?" They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews. Why should a German go in and give his money to a storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve Germany into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous. The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn't until 1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot a German official, that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth. Now I don't like to use the word "anti-Semitism" because it's meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I'll have to use it. The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible for World War I and for this world-wide boycott. Ultimately they were also responsible for World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive. In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided that Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between. And the Germans decided they were going to keep it Christian if possible. And they started to re-arm. In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that "Our turn was going to come soon, unless we are strong." The same as we in this country are saying today, "Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong." Our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars for defense. Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other countries of the world. For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT. Our nuclear bombs had a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT, when they were first developed. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have. What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. Why might such a war take place? It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. That is just as true as I am standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is known all over the world. What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you don't know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew it. You weren't permitted to know it. Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other insiders knew it. Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there. I was "confidential man" to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the finance committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson's brain the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement. Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand. President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby. That is how they got us into World War I, while we all slept. They sent our boys over there to be slaughtered. For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their "commonwealth." They've fooled you so much that you don't know whether you're coming or going. Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony." I don't know what state you come from, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness told one lie, disregard his testimony. What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because they are known as Jews. I don't call them Jews myself. I refer to them as so-called Jews, because I know what they are.) The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world's population of those people who call themselves Jews, were originally Khazars. They were a warlike tribe who lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe. They set up a large Khazar kingdom of 800,000 square miles. At the time, Russia did not exist, nor did many other European countries. The Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe - - so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That's how big and powerful they were. They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not want to go into the details of that now. But that was their religion, as it was also the religion of many other pagans and barbarians elsewhere in the world. The Khazar king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith --either Christianity, Islam, or what is known today as Judaism, which is really Talmudism. By spinning a top, and calling out "eeny, meeny, miney, moe," he picked out so-called Judaism. And that became the state religion. He sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of rabbis, and opened up synagogues and schools, and his people became what we call Jews. There wasn't one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy Land. Not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. Not one of them! And yet they come to the Christians and ask us to support their armed insurrections in Palestine by saying, "You want to help repatriate God's Chosen People to their Promised Land, their ancestral home, don't you? It's your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior. You now go to church on Sunday, and you kneel and you worship a Jew, and we're Jews." But they are pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish were converted. It is as ridiculous to call them "people of the Holy Land," as it would be to call the 54 million Chinese Moslems "Arabs." Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., and since then 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious belief. Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, from Mecca and Mohammed's birthplace. Imagine if the 54 million Chinese decided to call themselves "Arabs." You would say they were lunatics. Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy. All they did was adopt as a religious faith a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia. The same as the Irish. When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and imported to the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants. They hadn't become a different people. They were the same people, but they had accepted Christianity as a religious faith. These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns, were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. Because their king took the Talmudic faith, they had no choice in the matter. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So the Khazars became what we call today Jews. Now imagine how silly it was for the great Christian countries of the world to say, "We're going to use our power and prestige to repatriate God's Chosen People to their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land." Could there be a bigger lie than that? Because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business, and because they have the ministers in the pulpit and the politicians on the soapboxes talking the same language, it is not too surprising that you believe that lie. You'd believe black is white if you heard it often enough. You wouldn't call black black anymore -- you'd start to call black white. And nobody could blame you. That is one of the great lies of history. It is the foundation of all the misery that has befallen the world. Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you think is so sacred to them? I was one of them. This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser. I'm here to give you facts. When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, you stand up for the very first prayer that you recite. It is the only prayer for which you stand. You repeat three times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre. In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months shall be null and void. The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall have no force or effect. And further, the Talmud teaches that whenever you take an oath, vow, or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted from fulfilling them. How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916. We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same reason. From firstname.lastname@example.org Thu Oct 10 14:11:33 PDT 1996 Article: 97677 of alt.conspiracy Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!nntp.portal.ca!news.mindlink.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!newspump.sol.net!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!xmission!news From: email@example.com Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.conspiracy Subject: The Zionist U.S. Government Date: Thu, 10 Oct 1996 20:07:02 GMT Organization: XMission Internet (801 539 0900) Lines: 97 Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: rippers.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.revisionism:73083 alt.conspiracy:97677  "...(entire USA) in hands of Israel.."-Ari Shawit email@example.com Israeli columnist Ari Shavit claims "...the White House, the Senate and much of the American media is in our (Israel's) hands...." ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Following is an article from the June 13, 1996 edition of The Wanderer that cries for wide distribution. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "In Our Hands" by Joseph Sobran One isn't supposed to say this, but many people believe that Israel now holds the White House, the Senate, and much of the American media in its hands. This is what is known as an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory. The odd thing is that it is held by many Israelis. In an essay reprinted in the May 27th issue of The New York Times, Ari Shavit, an Israeli columnist, reflected sorrowfully on the wanton Israeli killing of more than 100 Lebanese civilians in April: "We killed them out of a certain naive hubris. Believing with absolute certitude that now, with the White House, the Senate, and much of the American media in our hands, the lives of others do not count as much as our own..." In a single phrase -- "in our hands" -- Shavit has lighted up the American political landscape like a flash of lightning. Notice that Shavit assumes as an obvious fact what we Americans can say publicly only at our own risk. It's surprising, and refreshing, to find such candor in an American newspaper (though his essay was reprinted from the Israeli paper Haaretz). The prescribed cant on the subject holds that Israel is a "reliable ally" of the United States, despite Israel's long record of double-dealing against this country, ranging from the killing of American sailors to constant espionage and technology theft. The word "ally" implies that the relationship exists because it's in the interests of this country, though Israel's lobby is clearly devoted to the interests of Israel itself, and it's childish to suggest otherwise. You expect that from the Israeli lobby; lobbies are lobbies, after all. But it's unnerving that the White House, the Senate, and much of the American media should be "in our hands," as Shavit puts it. Bill Clinton, a lover of peace since his college days, raised no protest when the Israelis drove 400,000 innocent Lebanese out of their homes in "retaliation" for rockets launched into Israel (wounding one Israeli) by a faction over whom those 400,000 had no control. Congress, of course, was supine as usual at this latest extravagance of Israeli "defense." Congress too is "in our hands." A recent article in The Washington Post likened the Israel lobby's power to that of the gun and tobacco lobbies. But there is one enormous difference. Newspapers like the Post aren't afraid to criticize the gun and tobacco lobbies. They will say forthrightly that those lobbies seek goals that are dangerous for this country. They don't dare say as much of the Israeli lobby. But much of the press and electronic media are "in our hands" in a more active sense: They supply misleading pro-Israel propaganda in the guise of news and commentary, constantly praising Israeli "democracy" and ignoring Israel's mistreatment of its non-Jewish minorities -- mistreatment which, if any government inflicted it on a Jewish minority, would earn it the fierce opprobrium of our media. No decent American would think of reducing American Jews to the status of Palestinians in Israel. The idea is almost absurd. Yet Americans are taxed to subsidize the oppression of Palestinians, on the flimsy pretext that they are helping an "ally" in America's own self-interest to be hated and despised by the whole Muslim world. All this is interesting less for what it tells us about Israel than for what it tells us about America. Frank discussion of Israel is permitted in Israel, as Shavit's article illustrates. It's rarely permitted here. Charges of anti-Semitism and a quiet but very effective boycott will be the reward of any journalist who calls attention to his own government's -- and his own profession's -- servitude to Israeli interests. Very few in America are doing anything to change this sorry state of affairs. Shavit wrote his article in the desperate hope of turning back his countrymen and his government from a morally and politically perilous course. At least he can hope. It's harder for us, when our own government isn't in our hands. =========end============== "All truth passes through 3 stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." --- Arthur Schopenhauer From firstname.lastname@example.org Mon Oct 14 09:59:27 PDT 1996 Article: 99259 of alt.conspiracy Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!nntp.portal.ca!news.mindlink.net!uniserve!news.sol.net!newspump.sol.net!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!xmission!news From: email@example.com Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.revisionism Subject: Re: Zionism and the Bolshevik Revolution Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 16:06:10 GMT Organization: XMission Internet (801 539 0900) Lines: 32 Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> References: <3258957C.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: rippers.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.conspiracy:99259 alt.revisionism:74157 firstname.lastname@example.org (Daniel Keren) wrote: >Every time I read the claims of strong ideological links between >Judaism or Zionism and Soviet communism, I fail to understand one >thing. >If such a strong link existed, how can one explain that communist >USSR, for many years, supplied numerous amounts of weapons, as well >as military training, to Arab countries and organizations which >fought many bitter wars with Israel, and vowed - again and >again - to erase it from the face of the earth? I would venture to guess that since the "self-claimed" jews of The Soviet Union were NOT true Hebrew Jews, who lived in Israel, they wanted to destroy the true Jew in Israel. Now that they (the false jews) have taken away Israel from the true Jews, and run it for their genocide plans. Very few REAL Jews have any political say-so in Israel. >If such a strong link existed, how can one explain that communist >USSR, for years, ruthlessly persecuted Jews and Zionists? >Can any "revisionist scholar" explain this? >-Danny Keren. From email@example.com Mon Oct 14 09:59:28 PDT 1996 Article: 99260 of alt.conspiracy Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!nntp.portal.ca!news.mindlink.net!uniserve!news.sol.net!newspump.sol.net!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!xmission!news From: firstname.lastname@example.org Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy Subject: Does England "own" Chicago? Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 16:06:14 GMT Organization: XMission Internet (801 539 0900) Lines: 334 Message-ID: <email@example.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: rippers.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 The Southwest Reporter Special Edition Sept. 30, 1995 Why Chicago as the Center for Metro and the New World Order Treasonists? By David A. Newby & "Grandma" As this mystery unravels we have found more that has been hidden from us. A very dear friend and fellow researcher asked a relevant question in reference to this Metro mess, "Why Chicago"? This is a very pertinent question and what the attendant research revealed will be just one more shock upon those already revealed. Grandma and I have to do our work by phone and fax. We don't have the luxury of having the same books to work from in most cases and this slows down this process of divination of the mystery. She has copies of the old Charter maps and through these maps we found that under the original charters Chicago and Connecticut were outside the Virginia and Massachusetts charters. What we discovered was that Connecticut and Chicago fell under the Hudson's Bay Company Charter. Quoting the 11th Edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica from 1911: "In the year 1670 Charles II granted a charter to Prince Rupert and seventeen other noblemen and gentlemen, incorporation them as the 'Governor and Company of Adventures of England trading into Hudson's Bay,' securing to them the 'sole trade and commerce of all those seas, straits, bays, rivers, lake, creeks and streams in whatever latitude they shall be, that lie within the entrance of the straits commonly called Hudson's Straits, together with all lands and territories upon the countries, coasts and islands of the seas, bays, &c., aforesaid, that are not already actually possessed by or granted to any of our subjects, or possessed by the subjects of any other Christian prince or state." With this broad grant of latitude of all the waterways it should be pretty obvious that the Charter included all of the Great Lakes. But aside from all of this granting of land by the King, the Charter was also granted the whole right to travel for trade to and from the bays and waterways whether by land or water. This clause of the Charter has heavy relevance later in this article. In 1842 a Convention was concluded with England establishing the northern border of the United States at the 49th parallel. In studying these treaties and the laws you must always look at the words because they always have a relevance. Citing the Convention as to boundaries, Suppression of the slave Trade, and Extradition of 1842 Article IV states: "All grants of land heretofore made by either party, within the limits of the territory which by this treaty falls within the dominions of the other party, shall by held valid, ratified and confirmed to the persons in possession under such grant..." This section states that any property rights would be honored. In 1863 there was a "Treaty for Settlement of Claims with the Hudson Bay Company, etc." Article I states in part: "...it was stipulated and agreed that in the future appropriation of the territory south of the 49th parallel of the north latitude, as provided in the first article of the said treaty, (1846) the possessory rights of the Hudson's Bay Company...should by respected." The verbiage is identical to the 1846 treaty of the boundaries west of the rockies and similar to the 1842 Convention. The relevance of all of this in these two treaties is that Chicago was a fort or outpost of the Hudson's Bay Company. By 1842, and most definitely by 1863 Chicago was a large city. It is a proper assumption that the Hudson's Bay Company had substantial property interests and holdings in the Chicago area and that is why these provisions in the treaties are there. Remember that the original charter gave the Hudson's Bay Company control over all trade and travel to and from the "waters". Chicago today is a free port under maritime. With control of the travel and trade granted in the original charter, it most probably means that the Hudson's Bay Company controlled all the railroads, ports and roads in Chicago and probably does so to this day. The Hudson's Bay Company was relinquished to the Crown in 1869. This means that Chicago, at least in great part, is nothing but a British outpost on American soil and there is your direct connection between Metro and the Crown! That's "Why Chicago"! When one is into researching this type of data you never know what you may find. While digging through the books I found the Proclamation of 1763 in the Documents of American History. Within this Proclamation we see the King of England establishing four new governments, one in Quebec, one in East Florida, one in West Florida and one in Grenada. All of this got us to thinking. Why is the King of England setting up government in these obviously French and Spanish territories? We discovered that France and Spain had fought a war against England and concluded it with a treaty in Paris in February of 1763. The Proclamation was issued on October 7th of that same year. We determined that these aforementioned territories falling under British control shows that they were "prizes of war" and taken under treaty. The relevance of all of this comes to light when you look at the fact that we supposedly bought the "Floridas" from Spain in 1819. How could we buy the Floridas from Spain if Spain gave them to England as war prizes? The question led us to the Treaty of Friendship of 1795. Within the treaties of Spain at that time the King of Spain was always referred to as His Catholic Majesty. But within the document of 1795 we find a reference to His Majesty, a distinct difference and not an oversight. Establishing the Commission for negotiations it states: "And if on any account it should be found necessary that the said Commissioners and Surveyors should be accompanied by guards, they shall be furnished in equal proportions by the commanding officer of His Majesty's troops in the two Floridas..." As it appears from the distinction between His Catholic Majesty and His Majesty, there were British occupying forces in the Floridas. Here is a plausible hypothetical scenario: The King of England took over the territories of the Floridas. The King of Spain had subjects in the cities of St. Augustine and Pensacola and elsewhere. the King of England took over the land, but let the King of Spain retain rights to the cities, i.e. the Spanish Territory of the 1819 sale. When the United States bought the Spanish territories in the Floridas it only bought the Spanish cities. When you read the treaty of 1819 where the deal was made "His Majesty" appears again. From the way the treaty reads, the King of Spain had to petition "His Majesty's foreign minister" to get permission to make the sale. The British control of the Floridas also helps explain why Andrew Jackson "fought the bloody British in the town of New Orleans" during the war of 1812... the British had a vested land interest! Grandma states that the British troops were probably expelled, if they were not already gone, by the Monroe Doctrine of 1823. Even though there was no physical occupation by the British, the Crown still maintains the property rights to the Floridas. This could explain why Dade County, Florida is where the Metro pilot program started. It also explains why the British sided with the South during the Civil War, they were part owners! Another point that must be considered is that as well educated as the generation of the Founders was, they must have known of the British ownership of the Floridas. Something of that magnitude could not be reasonably overlooked. This leads one to thing that there may possibly have been some kind of deal cut between the United States government and the Crown. Not of us was ever taught the Proclamation of 1763 which brings this all into question. I am of the firm conviction nowadays that anything that is hidden in hidden for a reason. We've proven, through treaties and charters that the Hudson's Bay Company owned Chicago and the travel and tread thereto which includes more than likely the Chicago Transit Authority, the Port Authority, the municipal water works, power and telecommunications companies, and the railroads. Notice on the list of CSG Associates how many public utilities and public transpiration companies are affiliated. The following will establish the ADL aspect or the Khazarian connection. Citing from EIR's book, Dope, Inc.: "The probe turned up a 70-year legacy of intimate ADL ties with Jewish gangsters, from Meyer Lansky and his 'Our Crowd' sponsor Arnold Rothstein, to more contemporary Dope, Inc. figures such as Max Fisher, Edgar Bronfman, Edmond Safra, Meshulam Riklis, and the ADL's own national chairman, Kenneth Bialkin, the lawyer for the Medellin Cartel's 'American Connection,' Robert Vesco. We also discovered that much of the ADL's financial backing comes from leading families of Anglo-American establishment, whose fortunes trace back to the British banks and trading companies that ran the opium clipper ships in and out of China in the last century." Take note of the name Meyer Lansky who was the head of the Mafia during the Kennedy administration. Lansky had definitive connections in Miami which still serves as a major point of ingress to this country for illegal drugs. Remember that Attorney General Janet Reno comes from Miami, or Metro-Dade, and has been accused of covering up all manner of corruption in the book Votescam and by other individuals who worked in close association with her. It is very likely that she was picked as USAG specifically because of her probably ties directly into Metro. The Khazarian Bronfman family owns the Seagrams empire which you will note is a corporate associate of the CSG. The Anglo-American banking interests include J.P. Morgan & Associates. Per the citing from Dope, Inc. these selfsame organizations serve as contributors to the ADL. The Great Chicago fire occurred 8 years after the 1863 Settlement of Claims with the Hudson's Bay Company back to the Crown. One of the prime methods of deleting land titles and records is by fire. You will find great numbers of burned houses of records in Peru, Venezuela, Chile, Brazil, and all across the South during the Civil War in order to expunge deeds as well as the original 13th Amendment. Franklin Roosevelt once said that in politics there are no coincidences. It is too coincidental that two years after the Crown took over the possessions of the Hudson's Bay Company the city of Chicago burned to the ground. What an excellent way it would be to destroy legitimate land titles and put a British beachhead in America. Grolier's National Encyclopedia states: "The Great Fire destroyed 2,024 acres at a cost of $178,000,000, which did not destroy the hopes of Chicago...which was rebuilt in two years..." That means about $1 million per acre! We've done some figuring on just where that $178 million came from and this is what we came up with. Of Course, this is speculation based on certain real factors. In the series we did on Railroads and Corporations we discussed the Gold Railroad bonds issued during the Grant administration that made certain Congressmen a 500% profit, for which none were prosecuted. These bonds totaled about $62 million. Consider that a life insurance policy (Tontine) on someone was about $2,000 at that time, multiplied by about 1,500 deaths and that equals $3 million. A rough estimate on property loss runs about $100 million what with residential and commercial property, railroads, grainaries and cattle yards. That leaves over $11 million unaccounted for. We speculated that the banks that burned called their loans in from the smaller banks which made up the other $11 million which caused reverberations throughout the nation causing the Bank Panic of 1873. To make more sense out of this: Railroad bonds........................ $62 million Property loss and death insurance.....$100 million Bank loans called in...................$11 million ------------------ Total............$173 million Which would leave $5 million to be balanced between the property damage, loss of life and the bank note calls equaling the $178 million required to rebuild. It is our contention that most of this money came from the Insurance premiums and the Railroad Bonds in order to build a new "capitol" city in America from which to launch the New World Order through the Agent called Metro. "In 1890, Lake Michigan and the Illinois Michigan canal received Chicago's sewage...the Chicago River, when the canal was brought in, reversed its course to flow into the Mississippi..." - (Groliers - 1939) With the Settlement of the Hudson's Bay Company of 1863 giving the lawful possessors of land control of the lands adjoining the water; with the burning of all titles and deeds to prove ownership being burned in the fire; with the control of the courts, what a wonderful opportunity it would be to expand those "holdings" of the Hudson's Bay Company to encompass all of Chicago. Anyone who disputed the claims probably lost in court as they could not produce their deeds or titles due to the fire. do you see how neat it is? And on top of that it is a possibility that the assets of the major people involved had been spirited away and stored before "Mrs. O'leary's cow" started the fire. Could the Great Chicago fire be nothing more than another insurance scam and power play by the British to reclaim this nation for herself? The record of provable deeds is so phenomenal as to numb the mind, so we don't think this is beyond the realm of possibility. Especially when they modus operandi is the same, only on a larger scale. Throughout this series we have laid out substantial proof of our assertions, which, upon investigation will prove out the charges levied of sedition, fraud, theft and treason. The United States government, in concert with the British/Zionist/Communist controlled Metro organizations and it's Governors' Conference of the fifty State Governors has worked continuously to destroy this nation. Even if we are incorrect in our assessment and potential reasons for the Great Fire of 1871, (and we don't think we are), there is still more than enough evidence to convict these traitors in any court of true justice. In 1908 the Council of Governors issued a Declaration to the Congress in reference to Conservation. This 1908 Declaration reads very similar to the RAMSAR, and Bio-diversity treaty currently put forth through the U.S. Government and the U.N., who is intimately tied into Metro. The year 2007 keeps coming up in matters before the Congress. The year 2007 is 99 years from the 1908 Council of Governors Declaration on Conservation. This Declaration calls for the "COMPLETE CONTROL" of the waterways, streams, lakes and rivers of this nation as well as for soil and forest conservation. Sounds just like the enviromentalist's "green" agenda, doesn't it? It is my assertion that that is exactly what it is. It appears that anywhere between 20-40 years before these treaties, declarations and laws are to take effect, by the 99 years rule under the Law of Perpetuity, the Metro gang create groups to push for the acceptance of the already decided change. That figures out to be 1-2 generations, plenty long enough to push their agenda through the propaganda mills and educate the next generation into acceptance. Look at how hard the agenda is working for the biodiversity acceptance through the cartoons your children watch and the commercials being aired on recycling. We are all being herded like cattle into the new Metro-ized society of the New World Order of British-Israel. We all know that the flooding of the Midwest in the last two to three yours is unnatural. Is it possible that these floods are not accidental? With the rerouting and reversing of the Chicago River and it dumping into the Mississippi the backwash would not be evident at the headwaters but would flood downstream. does the connection to the Mississippi River now give the Crown/Hudson's Bay Company a broadened area of operations? Who is buying up all that land that was flooded out? Metro and associates, ADM? Always follow the money. Who profits? These articles are supposed to make you think and maybe do something to save your country and yourself. Grandma, Rex and I can't do it all for you. You have to help expose the lie, and many of you are. In the last article we showed how the Federal Reserve came into being in 1913, but forgot to mention that two other British controlled organizations came into this country as well, the American Bar Association was organized in 1913 and so was the ADL. Through the research of the EIR group, Liberty Lobby and others it has been revealed that the ADL is nothing but an extension of the British Intelligence arm MI-6 and is a spying and propaganda organization here to do nothing but to promote the agenda of British-Israel, or Zionism. The Intimate ties are there between the Khazarian elite and the royal heads of Europe and have been intertwined for centuries. This nation has stood as a bar to worldwide feudalism for the last two centuries, but the efforts by these same entities to destroy this nation and her people have almost succeeded. Our own lack of attention, de-education and laziness have allowed us to come to this. Some blame lies with Metro et al., the rest lies with us. Sources: Documents of American History - Commager U.S. Treaties, Conventions, International Acts, Protocols and Agreements. Encyclopedia Britannica 11th Ed. 1911 Dope, Inc. EIR Grolier's National Encyclopedia, 1939 Ed. From firstname.lastname@example.org Wed Oct 16 16:21:30 PDT 1996 Article: 74917 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!nntp.portal.ca!news.mindlink.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!xmission!news From: email@example.com Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.revisionism Subject: Re: The Holocaust-What a scam! Date: Wed, 16 Oct 1996 18:36:14 GMT Organization: XMission Internet (801 539 0900) Lines: 27 Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> References: <3258957C.email@example.com> <3259F001.5FE2@area51.ufo> <firstname.lastname@example.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: rippers.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.conspiracy:100172 alt.revisionism:74917 email@example.com (Rajiv K. Gandhi) wrote: >Evidence of a conspiracy of a Jewish collective who took over Russia and >conducted the systematic extermination of more than 60 million Christians >is where ? IT is nowhere, because it isn't true. Certainly, there may have >been Jewish people who participated in the revolution. Certainly there may >have been Jewish people who killed. But that cannot jutify the wholesale >extermination of an entire ethnic group. For you to say that the Jews asked >for it, as you seem to be insinuating, is like saying that a rape victim >asked for it. Obviously you are extreemly afraid to READ THE DAMNED POST!!!! Sorry, but it angers me when people continue to believe what the socialist education system taught them to believe! Where is it??? I POSTED IT! Obviously, you only CONTINUE to read what you think is correct, and fail to even look at FACTS that you can find in the library or in most good encyclopedias, INCLUDING the Jewish Encyclopedias. Yes indeed, it's iratating as hell, to post information that is known fact, and then those who do not READ it, continue to plug their ears jump up and down and say stupid things, to avoid hearing something. From firstname.lastname@example.org Wed Oct 16 17:57:46 PDT 1996 Article: 100172 of alt.conspiracy Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!nntp.portal.ca!news.mindlink.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!xmission!news From: email@example.com Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.revisionism Subject: Re: The Holocaust-What a scam! Date: Wed, 16 Oct 1996 18:36:14 GMT Organization: XMission Internet (801 539 0900) Lines: 27 Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> References: <3258957C.email@example.com> <3259F001.5FE2@area51.ufo> <firstname.lastname@example.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: rippers.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.conspiracy:100172 alt.revisionism:74917 email@example.com (Rajiv K. Gandhi) wrote: >Evidence of a conspiracy of a Jewish collective who took over Russia and >conducted the systematic extermination of more than 60 million Christians >is where ? IT is nowhere, because it isn't true. Certainly, there may have >been Jewish people who participated in the revolution. Certainly there may >have been Jewish people who killed. But that cannot jutify the wholesale >extermination of an entire ethnic group. For you to say that the Jews asked >for it, as you seem to be insinuating, is like saying that a rape victim >asked for it. Obviously you are extreemly afraid to READ THE DAMNED POST!!!! Sorry, but it angers me when people continue to believe what the socialist education system taught them to believe! Where is it??? I POSTED IT! Obviously, you only CONTINUE to read what you think is correct, and fail to even look at FACTS that you can find in the library or in most good encyclopedias, INCLUDING the Jewish Encyclopedias. Yes indeed, it's iratating as hell, to post information that is known fact, and then those who do not READ it, continue to plug their ears jump up and down and say stupid things, to avoid hearing something. From firstname.lastname@example.org Mon Oct 21 11:02:40 PDT 1996 Article: 101920 of alt.conspiracy Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!hookup!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!xmission!news From: email@example.com Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy Subject: SYSOPS! Avoid seizure of Equipment! Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 16:01:09 GMT Organization: XMission Internet (801 539 0900) Lines: 54 Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: rippers.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 (begin notice) ========================================================================= NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENTS: The owners and users of this system are exercising First Amendment rights. Some material on this system is in preparation for public dissemination and is "work product material" protected under The First Amendment Privacy Protection Act of 1980 (USC 42, Section 2000aa). Note that this is a civil statute. Violation of this statute by law enforcement agents is very likely to result in a civil suit as provided under Section 2000aa-6. Each and every person who has such "work product material" stored on this system is entitled to recover at least minimum damages of $1000 *plus all legal expenses.* Agents in some states may not be protected from *personal* civil liability if they violate this statute. In addition, there is email, i.e., "stored electronic communications" as defined by the Electronic Communication Privacy Act (ECPA) which has been in storage less than 180 days on this system. Such stored electronic communications are protected by the ECPA from seizure or "preventing authorized access" without warrants specific to each person's email. Seizing the computer where this BBS resides would prevent such authorize access. There are civil actions which may be taken against law enforcement agents under provisions of the Act. You can find them in USC 18, Section 2704. On this system you can expect up to 200 people to have stored email. Each of them is entitled to collect a minimum of $1000 *plus all legal expenses* for violations of Section 2700 and 2703. While the agency you work for *might* pay your legal fees and judgments against you, why take chances? If you feel the need to go after email, or take actions which would deny email access to our users (such as seizing our hardware), get appropriate warrants. In addition, it is a violation of the Arizona Revised Statutes, to gain access to this (or any) Computer Bulletin Board System, by supplying false information to the Sysop, and you can be criminally charged with wire fraud. It is the policy of the sysop of this system to cooperate with law enforcement agents--though we will not be involved in entrapments. It is our utmost concern to protect the rights and privacies of all of the Members of this BBS. Please bring it to my attention if you discover illegal activities on this board. ==================================================================== (end notice) From email@example.com Mon Oct 21 12:33:14 PDT 1996 Article: 76192 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!nntp.portal.ca!news.bc.net!arclight.uoregon.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!xmission!news From: firstname.lastname@example.org Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: "Anti-Zionism = anti-Semitism" Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 16:00:49 GMT Organization: XMission Internet (801 539 0900) Lines: 72 Message-ID: <email@example.com> References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <32679414.60FB@ccnis.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: rippers.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 "Annie Alpert, OFB" wrote: >tom moran wrote: >> >> "Anti-Zionism = anti-Semitism"? >> >> Yup. This is one of the Jewish community's many absurd proposals. >> >Well, to be accurate, there are some non-Jews who believe this is true. >Witness: > (From M.L. King Jr., "Letter to an Anti-Zionist Friend," _Saturday >Review_XLVII (Aug. 1967), p. 76. Reprinted in M.L. King Jr., >_This I Believe: Selections from the Writings of Dr. Martin Luther >King Jr._ (New York, 1971), pp. 234-235.) MLK should talk. Of Course he would side with the Zionists... for he is a devote Communist. And a Russian Communist IS a Zionist. For so many years now, people think that all Zionists are true Jews, Hebrew Jews, but they are not. Just because one calls a banana an orange, does not make that banana an orange. The Khazarians picked Judism as their "religion". They were not born into it, nor did they ever have a right to it. Had Hitler self-declared himself a "Jew", would that make him a Hebrew? I think Not, nor would the Zionists. People need to keep thinking of the difference between Zionism and Jewish, ther're as different as a banana and an orange. When the banana says it is an orange, and if you say you don't like bananas, then you are anti-orange. >". . . You declare, my friend, that you do not hate the Jews, you >are merely 'anti-Zionist.' And I say, let the truth ring forth >from the high mountain tops, let it echo through the valleys of >God's green earth: When people criticize Zionism, they mean >Jews--this is God's own truth. >"Antisemitism, the hatred of the Jewish people, has been and remains >a blot on the soul of mankind. In this we are in full agreement. >So know also this: anti-Zionism is inherently antisemitic, and ever >will be so. >"Why is this? You know that Zionism is nothing less than the dream >and ideal of the Jewish people returning to live in their own land. >The Jewish people, the Scriptures tell us, once enjoyed a >flourishing Commonwealth in the Holy Land. From this they were >expelled by the Roman tyrant, the same Romans who cruelly murdered >Our Lord. Driven from their homeland, their nation in ashes, forced >to wander the globe, the Jewish people time and again suffered the >lash of whichever tyrant happened to rule over them. >"The Negro people, my friend, know what it is to suffer the torment >of tyranny under rulers not of our choosing. Our brothers in Africa >have begged, pleaded, requested--DEMANDED the recognition and >realization of our inborn right to live in peace under our own >sovereignty in our own country. They may have suffered in the past, but Black History Month would have us believe that ALL black slaves were kidnapped, when records show that many were SOLD to the slave trader by their OWN tribal leaders! And they fail to mention that it were whites, Europeans who were the FIRST slaves here in the Colonies... indentured slaves, who were sent here from England as prisoners, who had to work off their sentence of normally 7 to 10 years. Is it any less demeaning for a white person to be a slave than a black person? The problem with today is that the black person wants reparations for their ancestors, and are dispiteful of whites, but they (and whites) will one day again be slaves, if they don't quit living in the past, and join together with the whites and other races and fight the evil NWO together. Divide and concour, that is the whole reason between keeping blacks and whites at each others throats.
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
Home · Site Map · What's New? · Search Nizkor