From slepokuo@cadvision.com Sun Jan 19 11:31:39 PST 1997
Article: 93507 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!vertex.tor.hookup.net!hookup!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!howland.erols.net!worldnet.att.net!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.bc.net!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news.agtac.net!news.cadvision.com!ts2ip65.cadvision.com!user
From: slepokuo@cadvision.com (Orest Slepokura)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: SWC's Sol Littman's Dr. Joseph Mengele Hoax
Date: 18 Jan 1997 19:24:41 GMT
Organization: CADVision Development Corp.
Lines: 138
Message-ID: 
NNTP-Posting-Host: ts2ip65.cadvision.com
X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.0b30


The Deschênes Report tabled on December 30, 1986, contained the results of
the Commission of Inquiry on [Nazi] War Criminals [in Canada]. 

The commission owed its existence of a rumour spread by Sol Littman,
Canadian representative of the Simon Wiesenthal Center of Los Angeles, to
the effect that Dr. Joseph Mengele had once applied for a visa to enter
Canada.  
There was a suggestion that Mengele may even have set foot in Canada.

Contained in the report is a description of how the rumour was first
floated and its predictable impact.  

_____________________________ 

                The Deschênes Report [pp. 67-68]: The Mengele Affair

The opening paragraph of Minute-of-Council 1985-348 states:

WHEREAS concern has been expressed about the possibility that Joseph
Mengele, an alleged Nazi war criminal, may have entered or attempted to
enter Canada;

Two weeks before the passage of this Minute there had indeed been a public
outcry following the publication on 23 January 1985 of an article over the
signature of "Ralph Blumenthal, the _New York Times_." The article was
captioned: "Records indicate Mengele sought Canadian visa".  The third
paragraph read:

          Other records indicate that Mengele applied to the Canadian
          Embassy in Buenos Aires for a Canadian visa in 1962 under a
          pseudonym and that the Canadians informed American intelligence
          officials of the attempt. 

One month earlier Mr. Sol Littman, Canadian representative of the Simon
Wiesenthal Center, had written to the Prime Minister of Canada a letter
where he unequivocally affirmed:

         The documents we received on Mengele, who has been the object
         of world-wide search since the close of WW II, produced two 
         shocking pieces of information.

         (...)

         2) Mengele, employing the alias of Dr. Joseph Menke, applied to
         the Canadian embassy in Buenos Aires for admission to Canada
         as a landed immigrant in late May or early June, 1962.

The relation between Littman's letter and Blumenthal's article is
established. In the course of an interview with Commission counsel in New
York, Blumenthal stated "that it was Mr. Sol Littman to whom he had been
directed by the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles, who introduced the
element of an application by Mengele to come to Canada from Buenos Aires".

Littman confirmed: "I am reasonably sure that most of the information that
Mr. Blumenthal printed came directly from me."

In his testimony before the Commission in December 1985, Littman conceded
his paternity of the assertion of the facts concerning Mengele:

Q. [Gordon Whitehall]I see.  Let us just take a look for a moment, if we
may, at your letter of December the 29th, Exhibit 154. In that letter,
sir, you assert as a fact that Mengele, employing the alias of Dr. Josef
Menke, applied to the Canadian embassy in Buenos Aires for admission to
Canada as a landed immigrant.

Now I ask you, sir, whether or not--whether that assertion of fact, did it
come from the documents, did it come from the Immigration Officer or did
it come from Corporal Yetter?

A. [Sol Littman] The assertion of fact, Mr. Whitehall, is mine.

Q. [Gordon Whitehall] The assertion of fact is yours?

A. [Littman] Yes.

And to describe the basis of his assertion of facts, Littman could find no
better words than "speculation"; "impression"; "possibility"; and
"hypothesis".

[end of excerpt from The Deschênes Report]
____________________________________

On page 81 of the Deschênes Report it is further made clear that on the
basis of nothing more than "speculation, impression, possibility, and
hypothesis,"  Littman offered a version of events for public consumption
as though it were factual and solidly documented.  

What is even more telltale is that Littman had been warned by one of his
sources that it would unwise to do so: "Littman was, therefore, put on
notice that, in view of the paucity of available information, it was
dangerous to make the assumptions with which he was playing."  He chose
instead to disregard the warning.

On page 82, the Deschenes Report comes to the following conclusion
regarding Littman and his inglorious role in the Mengele Affair:

__________________________________

There is no documentary evidence whatsoever of an attempt by Dr. Joseph
Mengele to seek admission to Canada from Buenos Aires in 1962.

The affirmation has come from Mr. Sol Littman, and from him alone.

The documents which were then available to him related to a security
request from Canada, not an immigration check from Germany, and do not
bear out the theory of Mengele's visa application in Buenos Aires.

The advice which Litman solicited (whether it were from one or two people)
did not support his assumptions, but put him on notice about their
fragility.

As stated at the outset, all the Littman could rely on was "speculation,
impression, possibility, hypothesis".  Yet he chose to transmute them into
statements of fact which he publicized, with the results that are now
known.

This is a case where not a shred of evidence has been tendered to support
Mr. Littman's statement to the Prime Minister of Canada on 20 December
1984, or Mr. Ralph Blumenthal's article in the _New York Times_ on  23
January 1985.

Indeed Mr. Littman has stated before the Commission:

Well, let me put it this way.  We have accepted the fact that Mengele did
not come to Canada and, in all likelihood, never applied to come over to
Canada. We had no difficulty accepting that.

[end of excerpt from The Deschênes Report]

___________________________________

-- 
******************************************************************
What sort of truth is it that needs protection?  - Auberon Waugh  *
                                                                  *
The London Daily Telegraph, May 9, 1992                           *
*******************************************************************

Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor