The Nizkor Project: Remembering the Holocaust (Shoah)

Shofar FTP Archive File: people/l/lebouthillier.arthur/1995/lebouthillier.1195


From pendragn@cyberg8t.com Tue Jan  2 13:09:26 PST 1996
Article: 8478 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.coast.net!news.net99.net!news.cyberg8t.com!usenet
From: Arthur LeBouthillier 
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Subject: Re: $100 OFFER
Date: 19 Dec 1995 13:56:05 GMT
Organization: Cyberg8t Internet Services (800) 399-4NET 
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <4b6g9m$mpf@gate.cyberg8t.com>
References: <4agfvc$grt@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4ahlds$rqc@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: host04.cyberg8t.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit)

If you can find me a geneologist who can explain to me, if race and
language are always correlated, then I will give them $1 billion.
I mean, is the language that one speaks always indicative of racial
heritage?

So the offer stands.  If you care to claim the prize, e-mail me
privately. You can have 10,000,000 C-Notes to prove your linguistic
beliefs would seem to be a pretty lucrative thing.

Note: I will not accept the word of anyone with more than an A.A. 
inlinguistics.  Proof of degree is required to receive award.  Liberal
college degrees do not count.  The $1 billion goes to the first personwho 
can rightly claim it.  Multiple prizes will not be given.




From pendragn@cyberg8t.com Tue Jan  2 13:09:27 PST 1996
Article: 8479 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.coast.net!news.net99.net!news.cyberg8t.com!usenet
From: Arthur LeBouthillier 
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power
Subject: Re: $100 for Christian Identity
Date: 19 Dec 1995 14:00:39 GMT
Organization: Cyberg8t Internet Services (800) 399-4NET 
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <4b6gi7$mpf@gate.cyberg8t.com>
References: <4b0bo7$nks@spectator.cris.com> <4b488g$dsu@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: host04.cyberg8t.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit)
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:8479 alt.politics.white-power:11328

If you can find me a geneologist who can explain to me, if race and
language are always correlated, then I will give them $1 billion.
I mean, is the language that one speaks always indicative of racial
heritage?

So the offer stands.  If you care to claim the prize, e-mail me
privately. You can have 10,000,000 C-Notes to prove your linguistic
beliefs would seem to be a pretty lucrative thing.

Note: I will not accept the word of anyone with more than an A.A. 
inlinguistics.  Proof of degree is required to receive award.  Liberal
college degrees do not count.  The $1 billion goes to the first personwho 
can rightly claim it.  Multiple prizes will not be given.




From pendragn@cyberg8t.com Tue Jan  2 13:09:28 PST 1996
Article: 8546 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.net99.net!news.cyberg8t.com!usenet
From: Arthur LeBouthillier 
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Subject: The Annals of Hatred
Date: 20 Dec 1995 00:17:00 GMT
Organization: Cyberg8t Internet Services (800) 399-4NET 
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <4b7kls$poe@gate.cyberg8t.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: host26.cyberg8t.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit)

> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 95 22:53:08 0000
> From: Leonard Wassinger 
> Organization: Soundservice
> To: pendragn@cyberg8t.com
> Subject: (no subject)
> X-URL: http://www.io.com/~rlogsdon/aryan-page/misc-wpf.html

> you fucking ignorant racist pigfucking bastards! Somebody ought to
> cut off your decrepid little miserable bollocks and shove them up
> your aryan snouts! You´re so incredibly primitive that I can´t
> be bothered to taunt you any longer - I fart in your general direction!

I was just so happy to receive this letter that I thought that I would
share it with you all. It warms my heart to no end to know that I have
brightened the day of one of the "peace and love" crowd! :)

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           Arthur Lebouthillier
                           pendragn@cyberg8t.com
                  http://www.geopages.com/CapitolHill/1889
               We must secure the existence of our people
                   and a future for White children.
------------------------------------------------------------------------





From pendragn@cyberg8t.com Tue Jan  2 13:09:29 PST 1996
Article: 9377 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!frankensun.altair.com!nntp.coast.net!news.net99.net!news.cyberg8t.com!usenet
From: Arthur LeBouthillier 
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Subject: Re: THE THREE FALSE GODS
Date: 29 Dec 1995 04:46:47 GMT
Organization: Cyberg8t Internet Services (800) 399-4NET 
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <4bvrro$kf5@gate.cyberg8t.com>
References: <4bsctr$pdg@news.sas.ab.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: host30.cyberg8t.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit)

                            Nationalism

"This book is about the most powerful political force of the twentieth
 century, which is likely to prove the most powerful force of the 
 twenty-first as well: nationalism. Nationalism is a profound, if
 often malign[ed], expression of human identities, a negative force,
 but also a positive one. It is an expression of love as well as of
 hate. It is a fundamental element in modern political life and
 international relations. It demands to be better understood.

 ...

    Nationalism has been the cause of much hateful violence in modern
 history, and is so again today in the Balkans and the states of
 the former Soviet Union. The related phenomena of communal and
 racial violence afflict parts of Asia and Africa. However,
 nationalism is also the force which confounded and broke the
 imperialism of Lenin's heirs, and Nazism's domination of Europe
 in the 1940's. The two totalitarian internationalist movements of
 this century  have crimes to their account much worse than any of
 the crimes yet produced by nationalism, horrifying as they are."

The Wrath of Nations
William Pfaff (not kind to nationalism)
Pages 13 and 14




From pendragn@cyberg8t.com Tue Jan  2 13:09:30 PST 1996
Article: 9562 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!news.net99.net!news.cyberg8t.com!usenet
From: Arthur LeBouthillier 
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Subject: Positively Racist!
Date: 30 Dec 1995 14:50:23 GMT
Organization: Cyberg8t Internet Services (800) 399-4NET 
Lines: 102
Message-ID: <4c3jjg$5ut@gate.cyberg8t.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: host15.cyberg8t.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit)

                              Positively Racist

       "It is better to light a candle than to curse the darkness."

     Ours is a noble goal: We must secure the existence of our people
and a future for White children. For all of the goodness this goal
represents, we are often unable to adequately communicate to our own
people the Cause for which we fight. We must recognize that our
Movement has been too negative for too long. This negativeness has
slowed down the positive work that must be accomplished and has
permitted many well-intentioned activists to be misled and misdirected.
If we are to learn and grow as individuals and as a nation, a new way
of examining our task is necessary. I propose a new viewpoint which I
call Positivism and Constructivism.
     If we are to attain our goal, we must recognize the manner in
which the negativeness has evidenced itself in our Movement. First
and foremost, there has been a constant siege mentality and attempt
to keep ourselves as a secret society. This siege mentality has
created the conditions where we often distrust and fight against our
fellow comrades and spend more time guarding what little we have from
our own Movement members than in actively promoting our goal together.
Because of this, I have watched one of our comrades after another
leave our Movement from frustration. I have also seen high quality
people not join our Movement because of the apparent negativeness
and disorganization; we have thus lost important new members because
of our own actions.
     We can lay some of the blame for this siege mentality on our
enemies. Causing in-group fighting has been an important tactic
used by our enemies against us. The FBI's Cointelpro program regularly
had agent provocateurs sow the seeds of mistrust and misdirection.
Even organizations like the ADL have used paid informants to sow the
negativity. Jewish military leader Shlomo Gazit outlined a program
of counter-insurgency depending primarily on sowing intergroup
mistrust, disaffection with leaders and misrepresenting the group
to its public. However, knowing that this is an important tactic
of our enemy, we must resolve to deny him these tactics.
     I offer a new viewpoint from which to evaluate our Movement
and our activities; I call it Positivism and Constructivism. Very
basically, Positivism is defining the positive goal you hope to
achieve and Constructivism means to do that work which will have
lasting effects. It offers a simple way to evaluate your own goals
and activity.
     Positivism can best be summed up as "Define the positive goal
you hope to achieve." This may seem like a simple idea (and it is)
but it is an important first step to accomplishing any goal. There
is one significant thing to know in accordance with Positivism: the
difference between a positive goal state and a negative goal state.
A positive goal refers to a goal state that you would like to
maintain or bring about to a greater degree. A negative goal refers
to a goal state that you would like to stop or bring about to a
lesser degree. Therefore, an example of a positive goal is to have
a White homeland; an example of a negative goal is to stop non-White
immigration. The importance of defining the positive goal that you
are working towards is that you can consider where to put your
efforts to get the best effect. You can put all of your efforts
into stopping negative states without ever attaining the positive
state that you hope to achieve because you are not allocating your
efforts in the most effective way. Considering things in accordance
with Positivism, you can plan better how to attain your goal.
     Constructivism can best be summed up as "Make your labor count
for something." It is possible to select goals which have little
effect on our eventual goal of having a sovereign homeland. You can
go out and get in a fight with a solitary Negro and get thrown in
jail for five or more years for the "hate crime," but what did you
accomplish? Our nation needs to build a number of institutions and
reach important milestones on the road to victory but instead, you
are wasting your time in jail for little or no benefit to our Cause.
Therefore, Constructivism entails selecting an important and
significant goal and working towards its attainment. But how do you
know what is important and significant? You must learn. Learning is
one of the most constructive things you can do in preparation for
work. By knowing beforehand what must be done and what to avoid,
you ensure the most efficient application of your efforts. Therefore,
by educating yourself and others, you ensure that you are the most
knowledgeable and skilled to attain the goals for our Movement. The
next most constructive thing you can do is engage more people in
the accomplishment of your task. By bringing new people into our
Movement and educating them to become productive in our Cause, you
bring more people to work on our goal while denying those people to
our enemy. Another constructive thing you can do is to lay a long-
term foundation to simplify the work of those who follow you or
create the conditions for others to accomplish their work better.
A good term for this is "building infrastructure."
     By examining our Movement positively and constructively, we can
bring a new vitality to it. We will deny our enemy the means to
destroy us from within by misdirecting us and turning us against
each other and we will deny them the opportunity to misrepresent
us to our own people. We will work efficiently toward the attainment
of our goal and we will lay the foundation for future Movement activity.
We will also make our Movement a more enjoyable place for our people
to come.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           Arthur Ed LeBouthillier
                            pendragn@cyberg8t.com
                  http://www.geopages.com/CapitolHill/1889
                 We must secure the existence of our people
                      and a future for White children.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------




From pendragn@cyberg8t.com Tue Jan  2 13:09:31 PST 1996
Article: 9563 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!nntp.coast.net!news.net99.net!news.cyberg8t.com!usenet
From: Arthur LeBouthillier 
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Subject: (no subject)
Date: 30 Dec 1995 14:54:39 GMT
Organization: Cyberg8t Internet Services (800) 399-4NET 
Lines: 155
Message-ID: <4c3jrf$5ut@gate.cyberg8t.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: host15.cyberg8t.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit)

Affirmative Action: What's Changed?

 
 	Recently, three Supreme Court decisions and the California
UC Regent's board decision to end the use of racial preference
schemes have headlined the news. The way that the Left portrays
these events, one might think that we have reached the end of
affirmative action. One might also think that non-Whites' rights
and interests have been violated. The Los Angeles Times headlined
the story as "High Court Deals Severe Blow to Federal Affirmative
Action." Even the rightist Conservatives portrayed it as a significant
event. Pete Wilson, a Conservative Republican said "The country is
moving into a new era..." Despite the frenzy that both statist wings
seek to raise on this issue, these decisions were neither effective
nor conclusive. Though symbolic attempts to remain credible in
White's eyes, neither of these decisions means that the government
will protect or promote the interests of our White nation.

	In the first decision on racial issues, the Supreme Court
ruled in mid-June that government branches and lower courts must
use "strict scrutiny" in providing special racial privilege
programs; it didn't abolish Affirmative Action. The court said
that other government branches and courts may impose or support
Affirmative Action programs as long as there is, in the courts
own words, "compelling government interests."

	The case arose as a result of a lawsuit brought by a
White construction contractor who had been unfairly discriminated
against by the federal government's Affirmative Action programs.
In this particular case, the Federal government gives contractors
large sums of money to subcontract to "minority owned" businesses.
Because of this, the White contractor lost a bid even though his was
the lowest bid; he sued. After a lower court ruled against him, he
appealed to the Supreme Court, whereby it said that the lower court
must be more careful in examining whether his rights had been violated
or not. The Supreme Court sent the contractor's case back to the lower
court for review. The White contractor is still awaiting a decision.
	On the surface, this decision appears to be against affirmative
action. In reality, it sets a precedent confirming the principle of
governments using Affirmative Action. Although it does require that
governments be more careful in their application of it, however, if
the court deems that it serves a compelling interest, then the
Affirmative Action is acceptable. It is entirely possible that the
courts might decide that a broad array of cases meet compelling
government interests, especially with a liberal court. Because the
majority decision of the court stated that "all racial
classifications..." are "...inherently  suspect and presumptively
invalid," there will be many more lawsuits brought by Whites against
various governments as they question whether the discrimination
targeted at them served a compelling interest. However, this decision
was not the nail in the coffin of Affirmative Action. As the court
said, in response to "...the unhappy persistence of both the practice
and the lingering effects of racial discrimination against minority
groups in this country..." the "...government is not disqualified
>from  acting in response to it."
	In a second decision, the federal Supreme Court ruled against
a long-running school desegregation program in the Kansas City school
system. In this case, federal judge Russell Clark had ordered Kansas
City school districts to upgrade their schools to create better
conditions for the blacks there and force busing programs on the
White students. After $1.3 billion dollars were spent and there was
no appreciable improvement in black academic standards, the school
district was ordered to spend more money, an order which they appealed
to higher courts. The Supreme Court ruled that the broad orders
"...are beyond the District Court's remedial authority"  and that
low academic standards among black students is not sufficient reason
to force the expenditure of large sums of money to correct. The
court did nothing to say that these policies were inappropriate
or illegal, it merely decided that in this particular case the
district court had been egregiously wrong in applying them. This
decision didn't negate integrationist policies but merely reined-in
the power of lower courts to impose them. If it served any positive
purpose, it told district courts that there was a limit to their
jurisdiction and scope.
	In a third June decision on race, the Federal Supreme Court
ruled that the government could not use race as the sole basis for
creating voting districts to provide benefits and privileges to
minorities. In response to the ill-conceived Voting Rights Act of
1965, many states had gerrymandered voting districts to create
special mostly-black districts. In the case under review, a Georgia
electoral district was created which ensured a black congressman;
in order to do that, the district wound its way along thin regions
where mostly blacks lived to create an artificial black majority
within its convoluted borders. The sole reason for the shape of the
district was to create a black-majority district. The Federal Supreme
Court ruled that this action was illegal because it ruled that
governments cannot use race as the sole basis for creating a voting
district.
	In actuality, the court did not negate using race as a basis,
it merely said that it couldn't be the only factor for carving out
special voting districts. The court's decision stated that the
government must "cleanse" itself of using race as a basis for
decision-making. Although this decision is good as it applies
to creating non-White voting districts, it also makes it illegal
to create White voting districts, hence it hurts Whites as much as
it hurts non-Whites. Lastly, this decision confirms the U.S.
government's intent to distance itself from considering and
promoting White interests as it was created it to do. In its
majority opinion, the court stated that "Just as the state may not
segregate citizens on the basis of race it its public parks, buses,
golf courses, beaches and schools, it may not separate its citizens
into different voting districts on the basis of race." It now
pretends that it is the "government for all" when it is in fact
the "government for none."
	Finally, in the state of California, Governor Pete Wilson
motivated the University of California's Board of Regents to end
affirmative action in admissions and hiring. Although heralded as
a significant breakthrough, it is not all that significant of an
event. First, the change is ONLY at the UC colleges (which are for
the upper 10% of students) and not all state colleges. Therefore,
affirmative action programs will continue at most of the state's
institutions of higher learning. Second, it does not apply to
private colleges. In fact, private colleges have institutionalized
their affirmative action programs into special minority recruiting
departments. This means that there are still departments and people
in those departments who have a vested interest in perpetuating those
programs. An example of the attitudes of employees of those
departments is seen in the statements of  Ana Rafferty, the
Associate Dean of Admissions at Claremont McKenna college. She
said ""We work very, very hard to get a diverse [freshman] class."
She continues to say, "Very hard. Will the regents' decision change
anything? It's the status quo for us. If an application is from a
underrepresented minority...race is an important factor [in the
admissions process]. That will not change."
	In summary, most of the Supreme court decisions distanced
the U.S. government from representing White interests. In the first,
it confirmed its support for affirmative action. In the second, it
merely decided that only the upper courts and not the lower courts
could impose outrageous penalties. In the third, it confirmed that
it would not consider any race's interests. Finally, the University
of California Board of Regents made a symbolic concession to Whites
on the issue of affirmative action at its universities. None of these
decisions has any long-lasting benefits for the White nation. In fact,
one thing showed most evident: the federal government's lack of concern
for any race's interests. As one Supreme Court judge stated on the U.S.
government's intent to ignore its racial ethnic groups, "In the eyes
of government, we are just one race here. It is American." The future
for the White nation is questionable under a government intent on
ignoring our existence and neglecting our interests.



Copyright 1995, Vanguard
Vanguard
P.O. Box 86221
Los Angeles, CA. 90086-0221

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Arthur LeBouthillier
                          pendragn@cyberg8t.com
                  http://www.geopages.com/CapitolHill/1889
                 We must secure the existence of our people
                     and a future for White children.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------



From pendragn@cyberg8t.com Tue Jan  2 13:09:32 PST 1996
Article: 9564 of alt.politics.nationalism.white
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.net99.net!news.cyberg8t.com!usenet
From: Arthur LeBouthillier 
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Subject: Prefigurative Politics
Date: 30 Dec 1995 14:57:33 GMT
Organization: Cyberg8t Internet Services (800) 399-4NET 
Lines: 152
Message-ID: <4c3k0t$5ut@gate.cyberg8t.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: host15.cyberg8t.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit)

PREFIGURATIVE POLITICS AND THE WHITE COMMUNITY
By Arthur LeBouthillier

	Our Movement is complex and varied. It harbors all manner of
approaches to our people's survival. Despite this, there is much that
we can learn from other social and political movements. There are many
examples of nationalistic, ethnic revivalist, as well as separatist
and sovereignty movements from which we can learn. One strategy which
has recurred throughout such movements is what might be called
"prefigurative" politics or that activism designed to create the goal
society through incremental growth strategies. Our Movement too must
learn about and apply prefigurative politics to our Cause.

	Prefigurative politics is a term coined by the left to describe
their strategy of involving more people into an evolutionary process
of transforming existing institutions into those that might exist in
their goal society. The strategy is "...to create and sustain within
the lived practices of the movement relationships and political forms
that 'prefigured' and embodied the desired society"(Breines 1982, p 6).
However, this is not a new concept since it is practiced by nearly
every social movement. The early Irish nationalists had developed
parallel social institutions prior to their independence which
included their own police, courts, social support agencies and many
other such institutions. German National Socialists had created a
parallel government within their political party also with courts
and help associations. Shining Path Communists in Peru have created
their own government and social institutions including schools; in
fact, students raised at those schools have been taught to believe
that the communist leader is the real president of their country. The
Palestinian liberation movement's success rests on the government
which exists safely in regions other than Palestine. Under this
government, Palestinians have developed whole industries, schools,
and embassies. This approach of building our new society while in
the process of loosening ourselves from the current one is one which
we can apply well and with great success.

PREFIGURATIVE POLITICS IN AMERICA

	Pre-figurative politics in America must entail the development
of all societal institutions and the necessary infrastructure so that
we can displace the centralized government of this corrupt republic
with our own pro-White institutions. By using the full extent of
liberties and resources available, great strides can be made towards
developing pro-White institutions and infrastructure.

	Among the first institutions to develop must be the basic
communications and media institutions. By providing alternative
nationalist media, our basic political precepts and premises can
be communicated to large numbers of people. If these media are
complete enough to meet most of peoples' information and
entertainment needs, then we can enculturate them with our
political and cultural ideals and viewpoints while denying them
to our opposition. Our nationalist media will also act as a
recruiting element if it is positive and wholesome. Greater numbers
will see the positiveness that White nationalism stands for and
understand its legitimacy and importance. Such simple things as
book, magazine, and video publishing and distribution businesses
should be developed within the next few years in every major city
in America. This will ensure the steady supply and accessibility
of White nationalist materials.

	Perhaps some of the most important classes of institutions
which need to be developed are think-tank and foundational
organizations which study the theoretical issues of White society
and develop visionary outlooks, policies and strategies for our
leadership. It is from these idea-originating institutions that
our political leadership will find the necessary vision as well
as substantive background information necessary for making better
decisions. Our political organizations must promote positive
engagement and role-taking among their members so that there
will be a steady supply of pro-White activists. These activists
must be shown the positive activities that they can perform which
will benefit our community. Activists should seek to fill all of
the roles that a society needs, but the few key  areas must
discussed here must have higher priority. Activists must become
book writers, magazine editors, video producers, and business
entrepreneurs.

	Educational institutions in the form of private schools
must also be developed. Educational institutions perform two vital
societal functions: socialization and education. Although today's
schools are bad enough with regard to their educational functions,
it is the socialization function which is perhaps the most damaging
to White society. In public schools Whites are not taught their own
national identity but are instead indoctrinated with the
universalistic multi-cultural doctrine. Nationalist schools must
be developed which stress cultural identity and national idealism.
However, these schools must also set high value on developing
capable students who excel in the four R's: Reading, Writing,
Arithmetic and Reasoning.

	Numerous other social groups must be developed which seek
to enculture all of our people with good ideals and form them into
an organized community dedicated to national freedom. For the youth,
there should be organizations similar to the boy and girl scouts. 
These associations will enculture our youth with our ideals while
developing important skills and habits in a cooperative White
environment. Teenage and young adults should be provided with
militia organizations which further their nationalist education
while teaching them discipline, perseverance and service to their
nation. For fathers and mothers, husbands and wives, numerous
organizations with other like-interested people should be developed
so that a true cooperative White community develops.

	There must be a two-fold strategy of developing economic
infrastructure and business culture. We must identify those key
industries that will provide important economic bases for
businesses of all types. We must work at developing and
systematizing our business acumen so that it can be perfected
and communicated to entrepreneurs in our community. Realizing
that money is one form of power, we should do business so that
there is a net buildup of a pro-White economic infrastructure.
Of course, this must be done in such as way as to maintain
compliance with anti-discrimination laws.
	
BENEFITS OF PREFIGURATIVE POLITICS

By adopting prefigurative political  strategies, we will accomplish
several important steps leading to our self-determination. First,
we will create a positive, growing White community which is an
example for all to see. Second, we will ensure the existence of
substantive power structures which will be able to displace the
power structures of the corrupt U.S. republic. Third, we advance
our people's interests now, before we attain independence. Fourth,
we will be able to reach out and embrace greater numbers of people
who would otherwise be unable or unwilling to sacrifice their
personal interests by joining a revolutionary-based movement.
Fifth, every bit of growth of the White community will legitimize
our political statements while discrediting and delegitimizing the
corrupt republic and its integrationist, multi-cultural ideals.

SUMMARY

Prefigurative politics entails building up a White community within
multi-cultural America. Under this strategy, all types of
institutions and infrastructure are developed which separate us
>from  the non- and anti-White society. It provides many benefits
which are unattainable in other ways. It is a strategy that we
must employ in advancing our nationalist cause.

Originally published in the Fall 1995 issue of Vanguard.
Copyright 1995, Vanguard.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
                            Arthur Lebouthillier
                           pendragn@cyberg8t.com
                  http://www.geopages.com/CapitolHill/1889
                 We must secure the existence of our people
                      and a future for White children.
----------------------------------------------------------------------




From pendragn@cyberg8t.com Tue Jan  2 13:43:14 PST 1996
Article: 11328 of alt.politics.white-power
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.coast.net!news.net99.net!news.cyberg8t.com!usenet
From: Arthur LeBouthillier 
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power
Subject: Re: $100 for Christian Identity
Date: 19 Dec 1995 14:00:39 GMT
Organization: Cyberg8t Internet Services (800) 399-4NET 
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <4b6gi7$mpf@gate.cyberg8t.com>
References: <4b0bo7$nks@spectator.cris.com> <4b488g$dsu@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: host04.cyberg8t.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit)
Xref: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca alt.politics.nationalism.white:8479 alt.politics.white-power:11328

If you can find me a geneologist who can explain to me, if race and
language are always correlated, then I will give them $1 billion.
I mean, is the language that one speaks always indicative of racial
heritage?

So the offer stands.  If you care to claim the prize, e-mail me
privately. You can have 10,000,000 C-Notes to prove your linguistic
beliefs would seem to be a pretty lucrative thing.

Note: I will not accept the word of anyone with more than an A.A. 
inlinguistics.  Proof of degree is required to receive award.  Liberal
college degrees do not count.  The $1 billion goes to the first personwho 
can rightly claim it.  Multiple prizes will not be given.





Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor

© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012

This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and to combat hatred. Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.

As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.