From oneb!cs.ubc.ca!utcsri!torn!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!olivea!uunet!ccs!covici Thu Jan 28 09:50:53 PST 1993 Article: 15788 of alt.activism Path: oneb!cs.ubc.ca!utcsri!torn!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!olivea!uunet!ccs!covici From: email@example.com (John Covici) Newsgroups: alt.activism Subject: Let LaRouche go Free to Stop World War Three Message-ID: <241-PCNewsfirstname.lastname@example.org> Date: 26 Jan 93 15:17:50 GMT Reply-To: email@example.com Organization: Covici Computer Systems Lines: 112 *************************************************************** TEXT OF "FREE LAROUCHE" LEAFLET PREVENT WORLD WAR III! FREEDOM FOR LAROUCHE! Everyone, who observes the increasing gravity of the situation in the Balkans and sees how European politicians have been incapable of responding for 19 months to the ever new horror reports of concentration camps and rapes, can understand that this war has the potential, to expand not only to a general Balkans war, but even under certain cirumstances to trigger World War III. If the West does not intervene militarily, then the war threatens to spread to Kosova and Macedonia and thereby almost automatically also to Greece and Turkey. Thus two NATO member states would stand on different sides of the war--therefore the West must intervene if it does not want to give up the Southern flank of NATO. Various Russian spokesmen have already threatened that in this case they would come to the aid of their slavic fellow-believers. And then? January 27 is a Day of Shame for the U.S.A. On this day, four years will have passed, since the American economist Lyndon LaRouche was sentenced by a summary court and innocently thrown into prison. Since then he sits there as a political prisoner of the Anglo-American Establishment. His fate and his liberation are closely connected with the question, as to whether it will be possible, to avert the danger of World War III, for the key to this lies in a change of policy in the U.S.A. The war in the Balkans is neither a civil war nor a regional conflict. Rather it began near the end of 1989, when the Anglo-Americans reacted to the contrasting reunification of Germany and the opening of the borders of Europe with a reversion to the same geopolitical thinking, which was already responsible for World War I and thereby also indirectly for World War II. The possibility, that Germany could assist the states of the East in their economic development, brought back among the Anglo-Americans the old fear of Mackinder and Haushofer that the ``Eurasian heartland'' could surpass the ``Atlantic rim countries,'' the U.S.A. and Great Britain, in significance. And so already in November 1989 the myth of the alleged ``Fourth Reich'' was created in England, which served from then on as the pretext to allow all of the Serbian horrors to run their course, because a German intervention into the Balkans would prove that the thesis of the ``Fourth Reich'' were true. The truth is, that the Anglo-Americans and other geopolitically thinking forces, concretely Baker, Eagleburger, Carrington, van den Broeck and now Vance and Owen gave the green light for the Great Serbian conquest, because they expected a lasting weakening of Germany and the ``Eurasian heartland'' from a long smouldering Balkan war. That the same circles, who de facto supported Serbia for 18 months, have now changed their minds and are preparing a military intervention against Serbia--be it, because they see, that they have created a Frankenstein monster, be it that they want to continue their geopolitical strategy in the military domain and want to draw Germany into extended military actions against a growing number of Russian soldiers--changes nothing in respect to their original intention. A military intervention seems unavoidable, if the genocide is to be stopped and an escalation of the war prevented. But it is absolutely necessary, that there be an understanding beforehand among all the participants that they must put an end to geopolitics. We must urgently return to a policy of war avoidance, and in this depression-shaken world that can only mean economic development in the interest of all states, which creates the basis for life for all. If the U.S.A. changes its policy and no longer encourages the Balkan conflict on the basis of geopolitical considerations, but rather builds up the whole region economically jointly with Europe, and thus collaborates on a genuine peace plan, then there is also no longer a reason to leave Lyndon LaRouche in prison as a political prisoner. LaRouche is only perceived as a threat by an Establishment, that wants to base its power on a neo-malthusian ``New World Order,'' in which the U.S.A. claims for itself the right to control the raw materials of the world and to trample underfoot more and more the sovereignty of other nations. For Lyndon LaRouche was only thrown into prison by the Bush Administraiton, because he has campaigned for a just new economic world order, that would above all make possible the economic development of the southern hemisphere and the East. If President Clinton wants to prove, that he is really serious about his election promise to bring about a political change in America, then he should free LaRouche immediately! Help to bring about the release of Lyndon LaRouche, there is nothing better you can do to overcome the danger of a third world war! Write to the White House, and demand the release of Lyndon LaRouche: Address: Join in the appeal to President Clinton, which thousands of prominent personalities from the whole world have already undersigned! Coupon: I request further information: I undersign the appeal to Clinton etc. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ---- John Covici firstname.lastname@example.org
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
Home · Site Map · What's New? · Search Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012