The Nizkor Project: Remembering the Holocaust (Shoah)

Shofar FTP Archive File: people/l/lambert.pearl/1998/lambert.9802


From lambert@morgan.net Thu Feb  5 22:29:33 EST 1998
Article: 162944 of alt.revisionism
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 98 03:58:20 GMT
Subject: Re: STILL No Abuse And Insults?
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.revisionism,triangle.politics
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
References: <34CE1664.535D@global.net> <6aqq7m$vm@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net>
 <#dL2NebL9GA.237@upnetnews02.moswest.msn.net>
 <6avn71$cu6@dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com> <6b29rv$ntn@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net>
 <6b4se5$lu7@sjx-ixn11.ix.netcom.com> <6b5o5c$28c@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net>
 <6b7b5j$jvs@sjx-ixn4.ix.netcom.com> <6b81cp$879@sjx-ixn11.ix.netcom.com>
Lines: 31
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.58
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news-feed.inet.tele.dk!bofh.vszbr.cz!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!europa.clark.net!205.197.251.110!dca1-hub1.news.digex.net!digex!WCG!news.randori.com!205.218.162.58
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.conspiracy:252512 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:481951 alt.politics.clinton:323138 alt.politics.nationalism.white:89219 alt.politics.white-power:114737 alt.revisionism:162944 triangle.politics:29109

On 2/3/98 3:15PM, in message <6b81cp$879@sjx-ixn11.ix.netcom.com>, NSWPP 
 wrote:

>     STILL no wild tirades of hysterical abuse from the
> Usual Suspects?
> 
>     You guys are slipping.
> 
>     Or perhaps the better term would be improving. Can it
> just possibly be that you are coming to understand how
> childish and absurd all this has been?
> 
> 


 I HAVE SINNED BEFORE THE EYES OF MY GAWD. I AM A SINNER! I SHALL
REPENT AND STICK MY HEAD IN THE SAND AND BEG FOR MERCY AND FORGIVENESS!

I AM MY OWN WORST ENEMY! GAWD HELLLLLLLLP MUH! OOOOOOOHHHHH GAAAWWWD!
YE ARE MY SHEPERD AND I AM ONE OF YOUR SHEEP. COME SHEAR MY HIDE AND
MARK ME WITH THE MARK OF CAIN. I MUST NOW SACRIFICE AND FAST IN MY
GRIEVANCE! I MUST PART WITH MUH EVIL WAAAAAAYS! 

 WHO'S HAROLD COVINGTON? HE IS THE M-A-N! HE IS THE SERVANT AND
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ALL-MIGHTY HIMSELF. THE NSWPP IS HIS CREATION.
AND I REPENT FOR PAST CURSINGS OF HIS REPRESENTATIVES. OH MY GAWD!

 In response to your question: Why should I attack those of whom I
support? Yeah, right (!) one must say. I support the idea of a natural
order and will fight unto the death for its consumation.
 



From lambert@morgan.net Thu Feb  5 22:29:33 EST 1998
Article: 163031 of alt.revisionism
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 98 21:14:55 GMT
Subject: Re: STILL No Abuse And Insults?
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.revisionism,triangle.politics
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
References: <34CE1664.535D@global.net> <6aqq7m$vm@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net>
  <6ba5tk$hj5@sjx-ixn5.ix.netcom.com>
Lines: 58
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.42
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news-feed.inet.tele.dk!bofh.vszbr.cz!europa.clark.net!206.229.87.25!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!news-peer.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!news.idt.net!newsxfer.visi.net!WCG!news.randori.com!205.218.162.42
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.conspiracy:252716 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:482457 alt.politics.clinton:323505 alt.politics.nationalism.white:89280 alt.politics.white-power:114842 alt.revisionism:163031 triangle.politics:29125


> >
> > In response to your question: Why should I attack those of whom I
> >support? Yeah, right (!) one must say. I support the idea of a natural
> >order and will fight unto the death for its consumation.
> > 
> >
> 
>     Ronald, is that you or is this another NA forgery?

 Someone say something of interest? I have no affiliation with any decent
group or even hate groups. The esteemed NA (decent) and I have no contact 
whatsoever.
I have not authorized the peruse of my e-mail address to any individual,
much less any willing member of the NA.



> You told me
> you weren't going to post any more under this address;

 I never made this claim. I am personally aghast and trying to
distance myself from this so-called movement. I do not like it,
although I want to keep in contact. And what contacts I do keep,
is through this address.



>  I thought
> you were using "red@rahul.net".

No! I no longer post to any 'pro-white' (sic) newsgroup. I don't
have the time. I am disgusted by many others who are not 'pro'
anything yet 'anti' everything. To use the very name of 'red'
as if I were against the basic principles of Nationalism is
not my grand and glorious style. I would not denegrate those
of whom I disagree by such methods.




>  This SOUNDS nutty enough to be you,
> though. If it's a forgery, Vince has done his homework.
> 

 It READS as if I needed to proofread another poorly scribed post.
Vince is not John Hammer. I may be naive and take a man's word and
swear upon oath that this is the case, but Vince has placed this
base trust in me.

 I must forewarn you that I have sent a number of unpublished posts
to Hammer in the past, but our contact has ceased for some time now.
I do not contemplate if/and/or/when he may publish these posts, but
they may or may not be in my current agreement of them.

Kuuu-peesh?

> -HAC



From lambert@morgan.net Mon Feb  9 03:34:19 EST 1998
Article: 64232 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 98 22:41:00 GMT
Subject: WHITE  Aryan Mummies of China
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.white-power,soc.culture.usa,soc.history
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 368
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.33
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!fu-berlin.de!newsfeed.direct.ca!news.he.net!news.randori.com!205.218.162.33
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:63766 alt.discrimination:64232 alt.politics.white-power:115449 soc.culture.usa:198471 soc.history:42521


THE MUMMIES OF XINJIANG

In the dry hills of this central Asian province, archaeologists 
have unearthed more than 100 corpses that are as much as 4,000 
years old, astonishingly well preserved -- and Caucasian.
 
One glimpse of the corpses was enough to shock Victor 
Mair profoundly. In 1987, Mair, a professor of Chinese at 
the University of Pennsylvania, was leading a tour group 
through a museum in the Chinese city of Urumqi, in the 
central Asian province of Xinjiang, when he accidentally 
strayed into gloomy, newly opened room. There, under glass, 
lay the recently discovered corpses of a family - a man, a 
woman, and a child of two or three -- each clad in long, 
dark purple woolen garments and felt boots. "Even today I 
get chills thinking about that first encounter," says Mair. 
"The Chinese said they were 3,000 years old, yet the bodies 
looked as if they were buried yesterday."
 
But the real shock came when Mair looked closely at their 
faces. In contrast to most central Asian peoples,these 
corpses had obvious Caucasian, or European, features - 
blond hair, long noses, deep-set eyes, and long skulls.
"I was thunderstruck," Mair recalls. "Even though I was 
supposed to be leading a tour group, I just couldn't leave 
that room. The questions kept nagging at me: Who were these 
people? How did they get out here at such an early date?"
 
The corpses Mair saw that day were just a few of more 
than 100 dug up by Chinese archeologists over the past 
16 years. All of them are astonishingly well preserved.
They come from four major burial sites scattered between 
the arid foothills of the Tian Shan ("Celestial Mountains") 
in northwest China and the fringes of the the Taklimakan 
Desert, some 150 miles due south. All together, these 
bodies, dating from about 2000 B.C. to 300 B.C., constitute
significant additions to the world's catalog of prehistoric 
mummies. Unlike the roughly contemporaneous mummies of ancient 
Egypt, the Xinjiang mummies were not ruler or nobles; they 
were not interred in pyramids or other such monuments,
nor were they subjected to deliberate mummification procedures. 
They were preserved merely by being buried in the parched, 
stony desert, where daytime temperatures often soar over 
100 degrees. In the heat the bodies were quickly dried, with 
facial hair, skin, and other tissues remaining largely intact.
 
Where exactly did these apparent Caucasians come from? And 
what were they doing at remote desert oases in central Asia?
 
Any answers to these questions will most likely fuel a
wide-ranging debate about the role outsiders played in the 
rise of Chinese civilization. As far back as the second 
century B.C., Chinese texts refer to alien peoples called 
the Yuezhi and the Wusun, who lived on China's far western 
borders; the texts make it clear that these people were 
regarded as troublesome "barbarians." Until recently, 
scholars have tended to downplay evidence of any early 
trade or contact between China and the West, regarding 
the development of Chinese civilization as an essentially 
homegrown affair scaled off from outside influences; indeed, 
this view is still extremely congenial to the present Chinese 
régime. Yet some archaeologists have begun to argue that these 
supposed barbarians might have been responsible for introducing 
into China such basic items as the wheel and the first metal 
objects. Exactly who these central Asian outsiders might have 
been, however -- what language they spoke and where they 
came from -- is a puzzle. No wonder, then, that scholars see 
the discovery of the blond mummies as a sensational new clue.
 
Although Mair was intrigued by the mummies,the political 
climate of the late 1980s (the Tiananmen Square massacre 
occurred in 1989) guaranteed that any approach to Chinese 
archaeological authorities would be fraught with difficulties. 
So he laid the riddle to one side as he returned to his main 
area of study, the translation and analysis of ancient Chinese 
texts. Then, in September 1991, the discovery of the 5,000 feet. 
Photos of the Ice Man's corpse, dried by the wind and then 
buried by a glacier, reminded Mair of the desiccated mummies 
in the Urumqi museum. And he could't help wondering
whether some of the scientific detective methods now being 
applied to the Ice Man, including DNA analysis of the preserved 
issue, could help solve the riddle of Xinjiang.
 
With China having become more receptive to outside scholars, 
Mair decided to launch a collaborative investigation with 
Chinese scientists. He contacted Xinjiang's leading archaeologist, 
Wang Binghua, who had found the first of the mummies in 1978. 
Before Wang's work in the region, evidence of early
settlements was virtually unknown. In the late 1970s, though, 
Wang had begun a systematic search for ancient cites in the 
northeast corner of Xinjiang Province. "He knew that ancient 
peoples would have located their settlements long a stream to 
have a reliable source of water," says Mair. As he followed 
one such stream from its source in the Tian Shan, says Mair, 
"Wang would ask the local inhabitants whether they had ever 
found any broken bowls, wooden artifacts, or the like. Finally 
one older man told him of a place locals called Qizilchoqa, or 
'Red Hillock.'"
 
It was here that the first mummies were unearthed. This 
was also the first site visited last summer by Mair and his 
collaborator, Paolo Francalacci, an anthropological geneticist 
at the University of Sassari in Italy. Reaching Qizilchoqa 
involved a long, arduous drive east from Urumqi. For a day
and a half Mair, Wang, and their colleagues bounced inside 
four-wheel-drive Land Cruisers cross rock-strewn dirt roads 
>from  one oasis to the next. Part of their journey eastward 
followed China's Silk Road, the ancient trade route that 
evolved in the second century B.C. and connected China to 
the  West. Finally they reached the village of Wupu; 
goats scattered as the vehicles edged their way through 
the back streets. Next to the village as a broad green 
ravine, and after the researches had maneuvered their 
way into it, the sandy slope of the Red Hillock 
suddenly became visible.
 
"It wasn't much to look at," Mair recalls, "about 20 
acres on a gentle hill ringed by barbed wire. There's 
a brick work shed where tools are stored and the visiting 
archaeologists sleep. But you could spot the shallow 
depressions in the sand where the graves were." As Mair 
watched, Wang's team began digging up several previously 
excavated corpses that had been reburied for lack of adequate 
storage facilities at the Urumqi museum. Mair didn't have to, 
wait long, just a couple of feet below the sand, the 
archaeologists came across rush matting and wooden logs 
covering a burial chamber with mud bricks. Mair was 
surprised by the appearance of the logs: they looked 
as if they had just been chopped down. Then the first 
mummy emerged from the roughly six-foot-deep pit. For 
Mair the moment was nearly as charged with emotion as 
that first encounter in the museum. "When you're standing 
right next to these bodies, as well preserved as they are, 
you feel a sense of personal closeness to them," he says. 
"It's almost supernatural - you feel that somehow life 
persists even though you're looking at a dried-out corpse."
 
Mair and Francalacci spent the day examining the corpses, 
with Francalacci taking tissue samples to identify the 
genetic origins of the corpses. "He took small samples 
>from  unexposed areas of the bodies,' says Mair, "usually 
>from  the inner thighs or underarms. We also took a few bones, 
usually pieces of rib that were easy to break off, since 
bone tends to preserve the DNA better than muscle tissue 
or skin." Francalacci wore a face mask and rubber gloves 
to avoid contaminating the samples with any skin flakes 
that would contain his own DNA. The samples were placed 
in collection jars, sealed, and labeled; Mair made a 
photographic and written record of the collection.
 
So far 113 graves have been excavated at Qizilchoqa;
probably an equal number remain to be explored. Based 
on carbon-14 dating by the Chinese and on the style 
of painted pots found with the corpses, all the mummies 
here appear to date to around 1200 B.C. Most were 
found on their backs with their knees drawn up - a 
position that allowed the bodies to fit into the small
burial chambers. They are fully clothed in brightly 
colored woolen fabrics, felt and leather boots, and 
sometimes leather coats. The men generally have light 
brown or blond hair, while the women have long braids; 
one girl has blue tattoo marks on her wrist. Besides 
pottery, resting alongside them are simple items 
>from  everyday life: combs made of wood, needles of bone,
spindle whorls for spinning thread, hooks, bells, loaves 
of bread, and other food offerings. The artifacts provide 
further proof that these were not the burial sites of the 
wealthy: had the graves been those of aristocrats, laden 
with precious bronzes, they probably would have been 
robbed long ago.
 
However, Wang and his colleagues have found some 
strange if not aristocratic, objects in the course 
of their investigations in Xinjiang. At a site near 
the town of Subashi 310 miles west of Qizilchoqa, 
that dates to about the fifth century B.C., they 
unearthed a woman wearing a two-foot-long black felt 
peaked hat with a flat brim. Though modern Westeners 
may find it tempting to identify the hat as the 
headgear of a witch, there is evidence that pointed 
hats were widely worn by both women and men in some  
central Asian tribes. For instance, around 520 B.C., 
the Persian king Darius recorded a victory over the 
"Sakas of the pointed hats"; also, in 1970 in Kazakhstan, 
just over China's western border, the grave of a man 
>from  around the same period yielded a two-foot-tall 
conical hat studded with magnificent gold-leaf 
decorations. The Subashi woman's formidable headgear, 
then, might be an ethnic badge or a symbol of prestige 
and influence.
 
Subashi lies a good distance from Qizilchoqa, and 
its site is at least seven centuries younger, yet 
the bodies and their clothing are strikingly similar. 
In addition to the "witch's hat," clothing found there 
included fur coats and leather mittens; the Subashi 
women also held bags containing small knives and herbs, 
probably for use as medicines. A typical Subashi man, 
said by the Chinese team to be at least 55 years old, 
was found lying next to the corpse of a woman in a 
shallow burial chamber. He wore a sheepskin coat, 
felt hat, and long sheepskin boots fastened at the 
crotch with a belt.
 
Another Subashi man has traces of a surgical 
operation on his neck; the incision is sewn up with 
sutures made of horsehair. Mair was particularly 
struck by this discovery because he knew of a Chinese 
text from the third century A.D. describing the life 
of Huatuo, a doctor whose exceptional skills were said 
to have included the extraction and repair of diseased 
organs. The text also claims that before surgery, 
patients drank a mixture of wine and an anesthetizing 
powder that was possibly derived from opium. Huatuo's 
story is all the more remarkable in that the notion 
of surgery was heretical to ancient Chinese medical 
tradition, which taught that good
health depended on the balance and flow of natural 
forces throughout the body. Mair wonders if the Huatuo 
legend might relate to some lost Asian medical tradition 
practiced by the Xinjiang people. One clue is that  
the name Huatuo is uncommon in China and seems close 
to the Sanskrit word for medicine.
 
THE WOOLEN GARMENTS WORN BY THE MUMMIES MAY provide 
some clue to where exactly the Xinjiang people came 
from. A sample of cloth brought back by Mair was 
examined by University of Pennsylvania anthropologist 
Irene Good, a specialist in early Eurasian textiles. 
Examining the cloth under a low-power microscope, she 
saw that the material was not, strictly speaking, wool 
at all. Wool comes from the undercoat of a sheep; this
material appeared  to have been spun from the coarse 
outer hair (called kemp) of a sheep or goat.
Despite the crudeness of the fibers, they were 
carefully dyed green, blue, and brown to make a plaid 
design. They were also woven in a diagonal twill pattern 
that indicated the use of a rather sophisticated loom. 
The overall technique, Good believes, is "characteristically 
European" and, she says, the textile is "the easternmost 
known example of this kind of weaving technique." Similar 
textile fragments, she notes, have been recovered from 
roughly the same time period at sites in Germany, Austria, 
and Scandinavia.
 
Another hint of outside connections struck Mair as he 
roamed across Qizilchoqa. Crossing an unexcavated grave, 
he stumbled upon an exposed piece of wood, which he quickly 
realized had once belonged to a wagon wheel. The wheel was 
made in a simple but distinctive way, by doweling together 
three carved, parallel wooden planks. This style of wheel 
is significant: wagons with nearly identical wheels are 
known from the grassy plains of the Ukraine from as far 
back as 3000 B.C.
 
Most researchers now think the birthplace of horsedrawn 
vehicles and horse riding was in the steppes east and 
west of the Urals rather than in China or the Near East. 
As archaeologist David Anthony and his colleagues have 
shown through microscopic study of ancient horse teeth, 
horses were already being harnessed in the Ukraine 6,000 
years ago. The Ukraine horses, Anthony found, show a 
particular kind of tooth wear identical to that of modern
horses that "fight the bit." The world's earliest 
high-status vehicles also seem to have originated 
in the steppes; recent discoveries of wooden chariots with
elaborate spoked wheels were reported by Anthony to date 
to around 2000 B.C. Chariots do not seem to have appeared 
in China until some 800 years later.
 
A number of artifacts recovered from the Xinjiang 
burials provide important evidence for early horse riding. 
Qizilchoqa yielded a wooden bit and leather reins, a horse 
whip consisting of a single strip of leather attached to a 
wooden handle, and a wooden cheekpiece with leather straps. 
This last object was decorated with an image of the sun that 
was probably religious in nature and that was also found 
tattooed on some of the mummies. And at Subashi, archaeologists 
discovered a padded leather saddle of exquisite workmanship.
 
Could the Xinjiang people have belonged to a mobile, 
horse-riding culture that spread from the plains of 
eastern Europe? Does this explain their European 
appearance? If so, could they have been speaking an 
ancient forerunner of modern European, Indian, and 
ranian languages? Though the idea is highly 
speculative, a number of archaeologists and linguists think
the spread of Indo-European languages may be linked 
to the gradual spread of horse-riding and 
horse-drawn-vehicle technology from its origins 
in Europe 6,000 years ago. The Xinjiang mummies 
may help confirm these speculations.
 
Intriguingly, evidence of a long-extinct language 
belonging to the Indo-European family does exist 
in central Asia. This language, known as Tocharian, 
is recorded in manuscripts from the eighth century 
A.D., and solid evidence for its existence can be 
found as far back as the third century. Tocharian 
inscriptions from this period are also found painted 
in caves in the foothills of the mountain west of 
Urumqi, along with paintings of swash-buckling 
knights wielding long swords. The knights are 
depicted with full red beards and European faces. 
Could the Xinjiang people have been their ancestors, 
speaking an early version of Tocharian? "My guess is 
that they would have been speaking some form of 
Indo-European," comments Don Ringe, a historical 
linguist at the University of Pennsylvania, "but whether 
it was an early form of Tocharian or some other branch 
of the family, such as Indo-Iranian, we may never 
know for sure."
 
Perhaps a highly distinctive language would help 
explain why the Xinjiang people's distinctive appearance 
and culture persisted over so many centuries. Eventually 
they might well have assimilated with the local population
 - the major ethnic group in the area today, the 
Uygur, includes people with unusually fair hair and 
complexions. That possibility will soon be investigated 
when Mair, Francalacci, and their Chinese colleagues 
compare DNA from ancient mummy tissue with blood and 
hair samples from local people. Besides the riddle 
of their identity, there is also the question of  
what these fair-haired people were doing in a remote 
desert oasis. Probably never wealthy enough to own 
chariots, they nevertheless had wagons and
well-tailored clothes. Were they mere goat and 
sheep farmers? Or did they profit from or even 
control prehistoric trade along the route that  
later became the Silk Road? If so, they probably 
helped spread the first wheels and certain 
metalworking skills into China.
 
"Ultimately I think our project may end up having 
tremendous implications for the origins of Chinese 
civilization," Mair reflects. "For all their incredible 
inventiveness, the ancient Chinese weren't cut off 
>from  the rest of the world, and influences didn't just 
flow one way, from China westward.'
 
Unfortunately, economics dictates that answers will 
be slow in coming. The Chinese have little money to spare 
for this work, and Wang and his team continue to 
operate on a shoestring. Currently most of the 
corpses and artifacts are stored in a damp, 
crowded basement room at the Institute of
Archeology in Urumqi, in conditions that 
threaten their continued preservation. If 
Mair's plans for a museum can be financed 
with Western help, perhaps the mummies can be 
moved. Then, finally, they'll receive the study 
and attention that will ultimately unlock 
their secrets.
-=-=-=-=-
Western Imperative Network (WIN)
http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm

National Alliance/Europeans Only!
http://www.natall.com

Kill Whitey
http://www.postfun.com/~racetraitor
        
     





From lambert@morgan.net Mon Feb  9 03:34:19 EST 1998
Article: 64234 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 98 22:56:47 GMT
Subject: Aryan Ancestors On The Silk Road
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,alt.history,alt.politics.white-power,soc.culture.usa
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 126
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.33
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news.IAEhv.nl!newsfeed.wli.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!news.he.net!news.randori.com!205.218.162.33
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:63771 alt.discrimination:64234 alt.history:2148 alt.politics.white-power:115450 soc.culture.usa:198476

                       ARYAN ANCESTORS ON THE SILK ROAD

        

        Political correctness has gotten a slap in the face recently from a
number of archaeological discoveries in the Orient which indicate that the
founders of many Eastern civilizations, which are so revered by trendy New
Age types who despise anything White and European, were in fact racial
Aryans. One famous example is the country of Iran, which takes its name from
its original conquerors; until 1978 one of the many formal titles of the
Shah was "Lord of the Aryans."

        It has long been known that around the first century A.D. the
northwestern part of China was inhabited by a Caucasian people who spoke a
language called by scholars Tocharian. In the early part of this century,
French and German archaeologists excavating in the northwest provinces
discovered extensive written manuscripts in this language, and when they
cracked the code, so to speak, they were astonished at the similarities
between this supposedly isolated Oriental tongue and ancient Germanic and
Celtic languages.

        Now the PC academic and scientific establishment who want to rewrite
history to make it "Afrocentric" and get rid of "dead White European males"
have gotten another kick in the pants from the truth. Recent excavations in
the Tarim Basin in Xinjiang province have uncovered more than 100 naturally
mummified corpses of people who lived there between 4,000 and 2,400 years
ago, indicating that the Aryan incursion into Asia was in fact far earlier
and far more extensive than anyone previously believed. The bodies were
amazingly well preserved by the arid climate, and according to the New York
Times "...archaeologists could hardly believe what they saw." 

        The mummies had long noses and skulls, blond or red hair, thin lips,
deepset eyes, and other unmistakably Aryan features. Dr. Victor H. Mair of
the University of Pennsylvania said, "Because the Tarim Basin Caucasoid
corpses are almost certainly representatives of the Indo-European family,
and because they date from a time period early enough to have a bearing on
the expansion of the Indo-European people from their homeland, it is thought
that they will play a crucial role in determining just where that might have
been."

        [- My own understanding is that the ancient homeland of our
people was by the shores of Lake Baikal in what is now Russia, from whence
we began our migrations untold millennia ago when we were all one nation
known as "The Children of the Sun". As to where we came from before we were
hanging around the lake---I have my own theory, but that's another story,
which I won't get into now for a variety of reasons.]

        One such mummy of a teenaged girl with blond hair and blue eyes,
found in a cave, has become quite a tourist attraction in Beijing. She has
been nicknamed "The Lady of Tarim" and she is on display to throngs of
museum visitors in the Chinese capital. Apparently she was a princess or a
priestess of some kind over 3,000 years ago, for she was buried in fine
embroidered garments of wool and leather, along with beautiful jewelry, jars
and ornaments of gold, silver, jade and onyx. Her remains are in such a
remarkable state of preservation that the dead girl looks as if she were
just sleeping.

        "Diffusionism can now be taken seriously again," chortled one
historian, Michael Puett of Harvard. Diffusionism is the theory that the
ostensibly advanced Middle Eastern and Oriental civilizations of the ancient
world all benefited from contact with Aryan migrants, merchants, wandering
tribes, etc. and acquired much of their knowledge and attributes from these
contacts; this theory can actually explain quite a lot about history, from
the Indo-European roots of the Hindustani language to the Quetzalcoatl
legend of the Aztecs to the mysterious ruins of Zimbabwe which were so
clearly never built by blacks. 

        Diffusionism has been replaced over the past twenty years by the
new, Politically Correct dogma of "independent invention", which holds that
there was no contact at all between White people and any Asian or
pre-Columbian civilization, or if there was it was bad because all White
males are "imperialist exploiters". The PC theory teaches that EVERYTHING in
ancient non-White societies was invented by the indigenes, EVERYTHING
WITHOUT EXCEPTION, no ideas or influence from European contact, nothing good
or beneficial at all even if there was any White contact, which there wasn't
because White males are not the world-exploring hotshots they are supposed
to be, so there! I guess we made up Leif Ericson and Columbus was really a
monkoid. Don't laugh---I have heard both of those idiocies advanced
seriously by "Afrocentric historians". 

        (The PC eggheads also claim that Columbus was a Jew. Yeah. Right.
Ferdinand and Isabella, who had just finished expelling the Jews from Spain
in 1492, then proceeded to hock the queen's jewels to finance a major
nautical expedition by a Jew. What's wrong with this picture?)

        According to the independent invention theory, the list of things
non-Whites have independently invented includes the dozens of Asiatic
dialects from Hindu to Punjabi to Uighur, all clearly based on a common
Aryan root language---pure coincidence, say the PC profs! The agricultural
techniques of the Aztecs and Incas such as crop rotation and terrace
farming, so similar to ancient Roman and medieval European practices---bah,
say the intellectual gangsters of liberalism, the Indians made it up
themselves! The Mayan pyramids and calendar and astronomy, almost duplicates
of Greek and Egyptian knowledge (Egyptians who were NOT in any way, shape or
form negroes!)---those are all products of the brilliant Maya civilization
alone, according to the official line. The same Mayas' predelictions for
cannibalism and sacrificing young children by drowning them in sacred wells
is ignored.

        The blue eyes and broken Welsh language of Missouri's Mandan
Indians; the Celtic-style megaliths and stone round towers of New England;
the Viking ruins of L'Anse Aux Meadow in Newfoundland; the runic
inscriptions on Connecticut's Dighton Rock and the Minnesota Kensington
stone; Shaka the Zulu's organization of his impis based on Napoleon's system
which he got from a French hunter and trader who was a Napoleonic veteran;
the stone ruins of Zimbabwe so utterly unlike anything ever found anywhere
else in black Africa and resembling nothing so much as a Bronze Age Celtic
fort; the long Aryan features of the Easter Island statues---nyet, no, nada,
nein, no way! According to the left-wing academic establishment, NOTHING was
ever learned by non-Whites from contact between Third World cultures and
Aryan man.

        How PC academia will explain away those hundred blond-haired,
blue-eyed mummies from China I don't know, but I'm sure it will be good.
Looks like us Children of the Sun got around in the old days.
-=--=-=-=-=-
Western Imperative Network (WIN)
http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm

National Alliance/Europeans Only
http://www.natall.com

Americas Forgotten White Slaves
http://www.hoffman-info.com





From lambert@morgan.net Mon Feb  9 03:34:20 EST 1998
Article: 64240 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 98 00:12:23 GMT
Subject: Re: Aryan Ancestors On The Silk Road
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,alt.history,alt.politics.white-power,soc.culture.usa
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
References: 
 <34de3dcc.1937834@news.univie.ac.at>
Lines: 119
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.33
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!WCG!news.randori.com!205.218.162.33
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:63787 alt.discrimination:64240 alt.history:2151 alt.politics.white-power:115458 soc.culture.usa:198500

On 2/8/98 5:20PM, in message <34de3dcc.1937834@news.univie.ac.at>, Thomas Mohr 
 wrote:

> On Sun, 08 Feb 98 22:56:47 GMT, lambert@morgan.net wrote:
> 
> < snip >
> >        It has long been known that around the first century A.D. the
> >northwestern part of China was inhabited by a Caucasian people who spoke a
> >language called by scholars Tocharian. In the early part of this century,
> >French and German archaeologists excavating in the northwest provinces
> >discovered extensive written manuscripts in this language, and when they
> >cracked the code, so to speak, they were astonished at the similarities
> >between this supposedly isolated Oriental tongue and ancient Germanic and
> >Celtic languages.
> 
> So what ? That Tocharian is an indo-european language is well
> established knowledge now.
> 
 
 Tsk. Tsk. Must one be so harsh? The opening paragraph simply stated
facts. One hundred and sixty years ago, most historians would have
told the 'educated' that Egypt was the founder of Western Civilization.
Although the origins of our civilization does not lie along the Nile, it
is good to point out simple facts.



> 
> >        [- My own understanding is that the ancient homeland of our
> >people was by the shores of Lake Baikal in what is now Russia, from whence
> >we began our migrations untold millennia ago when we were all one nation
> >known as "The Children of the Sun". As to where we came from before we were
> >hanging around the lake---I have my own theory, but that's another story,
> >which I won't get into now for a variety of reasons.]
> 
> Why, because it is so ridiculous ?

 Ridiculous? Is Mr. Mohr (jew?) objective or simply attacking a wee li'l
comment? Does an Orientalist find it 'ridiculous' to suggest that after
the Ice Ages Europe voided much of her ice, the proto-Aryans
began their migration from the Southern Steppes of Russsia, Anatolia, or
some nearby area of Central Asia? It is a plausible theory. However, the
standard response that "about 2000 B.C.E. the Indo-Europeans emerged from
these steppes and this branch went south into the desert/Middle-East while
their other kinsmen trekked westward into Greece, Rome, and Europe proper."

 I find this of interest, yet I do not condemn such a theory. I do find it
somewhat too 'base' and wishfully categorical.


> 
> >
> >        "Diffusionism can now be taken seriously again," chortled one
> >historian, Michael Puett of Harvard. Diffusionism is the theory that the
> >ostensibly advanced Middle Eastern and Oriental civilizations of the ancient
> >world all benefited from contact with Aryan migrants, merchants, wandering
> >tribes, etc. and acquired much of their knowledge and attributes from these
> >contacts; this theory can actually explain quite a lot about history, from
> >the Indo-European roots of the Hindustani language to the Quetzalcoatl
> >legend of the Aztecs to the mysterious ruins of Zimbabwe which were so
> >clearly never built by blacks. 
> 
> Proof ?

 Who needs proof? Seriously, the founders of the Middle-Eastern civlizations,
i.e., Sumeria, Akkadia, Babylon, were of Europid origins. They were akin to
the Meditteranid sub-race, resembling Italians and Spaniards of today.

 I have noticed that when referring to "Semites" (sic) one often thinks of
hook-nosed Arabs, yet the original speakers of anything 'semitic' were 
Meditteranid. The Phoenicians and Carthagians were not racially Arabs, but
olive-complected Europids who spoke a seperate and non-Europid dialect.



> 
> As for the indo-european roots of certain indan languages ... why do
> you think that this family of languages is called "indo-european" ?
> 
> < snip >
> 
> >        According to the independent invention theory, the list of things
> >non-Whites have independently invented includes the dozens of Asiatic
> >dialects from Hindu to Punjabi to Uighur, all clearly based on a common
> >Aryan root language---pure coincidence, say the PC profs! The agricultural
> >techniques of the Aztecs and Incas such as crop rotation and terrace
> >farming, so similar to ancient Roman and medieval European practices---bah,
> >say the intellectual gangsters of liberalism, the Indians made it up
> >themselves! 
> 
> Did you ever hear that if somebody puts together 2 apples and 2 apples
> he will get 4 ? Absolutely independently wether he is in America or in
> Europe or on the moon ? Or, if you want to construct something that
> cuts meat, it will most likely be a knife and not a CD player. Ever
> heard that function dictates the form ? Even in evolution there are
> parallel developments which look very similarily and have nothing
> whatsoever to do with each other. Why do dolphins and sharks have so
> very similar fins although they are evolutonary seen lightyears apart
> ?  You seem to be the only one thinking that this is not possible.
> 
 Yes, I have heard of this technique many, many times.




> >The Mayan pyramids and calendar and astronomy, almost duplicates
> >of Greek and Egyptian knowledge (Egyptians who were NOT in any way, shape or
> >form negroes!)---those are all products of the brilliant Maya civilization
> >alone, according to the official line. The same Mayas' predelictions for
> >cannibalism and sacrificing young children by drowning them in sacred wells
> >is ignored.
> 
> >Americas Forgotten White Slaves
> >http://www.hoffman-info.com
> >
> >
> >
> 




From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:16:43 EST 1998
Article: 164286 of alt.revisionism
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 98 06:15:03 GMT
Subject: Re: Crapfest Diminishing
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.nswpp,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.revisionism,alt.skinheads,triangle.politics
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 74
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.54
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!Supernews73!supernews.com!howland.erols.net!nntp.abs.net!WCG!news.randori.com!205.218.162.54
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.nswpp:11408 alt.politics.nationalism.white:89994 alt.politics.white-power:116095 alt.revisionism:164286 alt.skinheads:84193 triangle.politics:29308

On 2/14/98 3:20PM, in message <6c51ra$if6@sjx-ixn6.ix.netcom.com>, NSWPP 
 wrote:

>     I'm sure I'm not the only one who's noticed that the
> Hate Harold crapfest has been slowly diminishing for some time
> now, and especially since former members of the NA "cyber-cell"
> blew the whistle on the fact that the whole thing since July
> has been more or less run by only two Induhviduals, Will Williams
> and Vince Breeding, posting under God knows how many aliases
> and fraudulent e-mail addresses.

Tubby, why present proof when you can fib your way into spinning
more lies? Ian McKinney recently rebuked your claims that any
NA "cyber-cell" members -- former or present -- have any claims
of attacking you via their home or anonymous e-mail addresses.



>  I wonder if anyone has
> tried to do an analysis of just how much all this horse shit
> has COST the NA in money terms, lawyers and all?

John Hammer is not a NA member, nor has the NA financed
one penny towards refuting your diabolical and self-incriminating
claims.


>  'Nswpp.com",
> I note, hasn't been updated for several months.

John Hammer updated his page yesterday. I believe the court
documents PROVE you are a BONA FIDE FEDERAL INFORMANT, tubby.



> 
>     What I think is happening here is that A) Slowly but surely,
> the Ditzy Duo have come to understand that it is impossible to
> drive someone off the Internet who wants to be there;

 Aye, and your crystal ball proves this, tubby?




>  and B) They
> are making total fools of themselves and the National Alliance.

The "hate patriots" position of you defendant Covington is well-known
and documented at ___http://www.nswpp.com___

 You are a convicted con-artist! Why lie some more?


> This last has been a long, long time sinking in---I have never in
> my life known anyone as completely self-absorbed and utterly
> unable to understand how other people see their behavior as
> the minions of the National Alliance, but even they, I think,
> are finally seeing the handwriting on the wall.

 The "handwriting on the wall" has been scribbled by you for
26 years, tubby. You and your ill-used Nasty Party have not
elected one single patriot to office. You, defendant Sir, are
the real loser in this 'game.'



>  Harold Covington
> 
> 
> 88!
> HAC
> 




From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:16:44 EST 1998
Article: 164379 of alt.revisionism
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 98 03:03:41 GMT
Subject: JEWS Fought for Hitler !!
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.history.what-if,alt.revisionism
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 251
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.40
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!Supernews73!Supernews60!supernews.com!uunet!in4.uu.net!news.randori.com!205.218.162.40
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.history.what-if:22598 alt.revisionism:164379


Jews are wrestling with another of their own Big Lies. 
As time passes more and more "discoveries" are made about what really happened 
in WWII. In the Tugent article, an independent researcher finds Germans with 
Jewish ancestry who fought on the German side of the war. Both articles, which 
still maintain the myth of "extermination" camps, ignores the
 contradictions inherent in the story itself. Actually, the National Socialist 
racial policy extended German citizenship to anyone who was half German, 
including half-Jewish. The "revelation" only appears amazing to those spoon-fed 
50 plus years of anti-German propaganda. Soon someone will "disc
over" that 300,000 Jews lived in Germany in 1939 and that 300,000 Jews lived in 
Germany in 1945. Then they'll ask: "How can that be, weren't they all gassed?" 
Ed.

------------------------------------------------------------------------




GRAD STUDENT UNCOVERS JEWS WHO FOUGHT FOR HITLER
By Tom Tugend 
Jewish Telegraph Agency (JTA)


LOS ANGELES, Dec. 26 (JTA) -- Thousands of soldiers and officers of Jewish 
descent fought in Hitler's armies, with his full approval, while their 
relatives were transported to extermination camps.

In one instance, Hitler personally suspended his Nuremberg racial laws to 
designate a list of 77 high-ranking Wehrmacht officers of "mixed Jewish race or 
married to a Jew'' as pure, German-blooded Aryans. The list included 15 
generals. These incredible tales were unearthed by Bryan Rigg, a 25-ye
ar-old Yale University graduate. Rigg has spent four years scouring German army 
records and interviewing more than 300 Jewish or partly Jewish people who 
fought under the swastika in World War II. 

The Texas-born Rigg is now a graduate history student at Cambridge University 
in England, where he was interviewed by the London correspondent of the Los 
Angeles Times. His research has impressed historians. 

Jonathan Steinberg, a professor at Cambridge, said, "When I saw Bryan's 
archive, I couldn't believe it. He's like the sorcerer's apprentice, calling 
these sources up from the depths.'' 

Rigg said he had documented the Jewish ancestry of 1,200 of Hitler's soldiers, 
among them two field marshals. Twenty of these men were awarded the Knight's 
Cross, Germany's highest military decoration. One of the field marshals was 
Erhard Milch, deputy to Luftwaffe Chief and Gestapo founder Herm
ann Goering. Rumors of Milch's Jewishness -- his father was Jewish -- 
circulated widely in Germany in the 1930s. 

In one of the famous anecdotes of the time, Goering falsified Milch's birth 
record and then said, "I decide who is a Jew and who is an Aryan.'' 

>From  his interviews, Rigg culled stories that defy belief. One was about a 
German officer, in full uniform, who visited the Sachsenhausen concentration 
camp in 1942 to see his Jewish father, one of the inmates. Another story was 
about a Knight's Cross holder who, as a prisoner of war in England,
 was reunited with his Jewish father, who had earlier fled Germany. 

Many of the veterans Rigg met indicated that they had hoped through their 
military service to save the lives of relatives classified as Jews. But in 
analyzing one group of 1,000 such soldiers, Rigg found that nearly 2,300 of 
their relatives were killed in the Holocaust. 

Rigg's research also shed light on stories surrounding the rescue by German 
soldiers of the Lubavitcher rebbe of that time, who was trapped in Warsaw when 
war broke out in 1939. Joseph Isaac Schneerson was spirited to safety after an 
appeal to Germany from the then-neutral United States. Traditi
on has it that Schneerson was rescued by a German Jew. Rigg has identified the 
man as a highly decorated professional soldier, Maj. Ernst Bloch, whose father 
was a Jew. 

Rigg started his quest at Yale while digging into his own family's German 
roots. His first discovery was that his great- grandparents, who arrived in the 
United States as Protestants, had been born in Germany as Jews. Next, he 
happened to see the film "Europa, Europa,'' the true story of a Jewis
h teen-ager who saved his life by posing as an ethnic German and serving in the 
Nazi army. Afterward, Rigg struck up a chance conversation with an elderly 
German Jew, who spoke about his own service in the Wehrmacht, and Rigg was 
hooked. 

With hardly any financial resources, Rigg conducted his interviews by 
crisscrossing Germany, often by bicycle, carrying his clothes, computer and 
documents in a bulging knapsack. He has 400 more interviews to go on his 
current check list. "The thing is, I don't give up,'' Rigg told the Los Angel
es Times. ``If I have to carry 60 pounds on my back, I do it. If I have to 
sleep in train stations, I do it. I do it to get to these people.'' 

The initial reports on Rigg's findings in the British media have provoked 
debates among historians. Most agree that while the fact that Jews served in 
the Wehrmacht has been known for some time, the story has never before been 
documented in such intimate detail. 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
( Return to top of page ) 





HITLER'S MARTIAL JEWS
By Bernard Levin
Copyright 1996 Times Newspapers Limited


(December 6, 1996, Friday) Jewish and part-Jewish soldiers fought for the Third 
Reich. What did they think they were doing? We shall never know.

When will the Holocaust be the Holocaust, in all its terrible meaning and no 
more? When will professors stop finding a new "angle" on something that can 
never have an angle? When will the dreadful fools and madmen who prove that 
there was no Holocaust (I have just got another pamphlet saying as 
much), stop hating and even stop being mad?

Never, I fear, but I have long ago given up trying to convince fools and 
professors that my nose is of standard British length and width and no more. 
Wearily, I shrug, and say, yes, I am a Jew, and no, no member of my family died 
in the Holocaust. And, just to clinch it, no - my name has always 
been Levin, and never Featherstonhaugh-Golightly. 

Now then. What would you say if Adolf Hitler were on his throne and the 
Holocaust was in full blast, but German Jews were not only serving in Hitler's 
ranks, but personally enlisting in those ranks. Not just to find a place that 
the Nazis might not spot, but with full intent to take part in the 
war on Hitler's side? It sounds lunatic, and in a sense it was. But read this:

It seems that those Jewish Germans who enlisted voluntarily and made efforts to 
remain in uniform even after their Jewish origins came under scrutiny by the 
authorities were allowed to do so. Indeed, some rose to high rank and several 
won the Ritterkreuz , the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross, G
ermany's highest military decoration, awarded to fighter aces, U-boat captains 
and tank destroyers. They performed their feats of bravery at the height of the 
war, when the Nazi state was murdering German Jews in hundreds of thousands and 
the Jews of Eastern Europe in millions.

Only they can explain why they chose the path they did, and all are now old or 
already dead.

These almost unbelievable facts were dug up by a young American student, Bryan 
Rigg, who, in a chance meeting, was to reveal some of the most extraordinary 
true stories of the Second World War. Rigg did not even know, before he began 
his studies in this fascinating story, that he was of German-J
ewish ancestry, but believed his family was of the Protestant Bible-belt, and 
among his amazements were the members of his family who had stayed in Germany 
and died in the Holocaust.

And now, with this extraordinary story at our elbows, we are tempted to believe 
that the whole thing is, and must be, a hoax. But it isn't. It is not only 
true, from top to bottom, it is terrible. Terrible, you say? Just glance at one 
headline (the story broke in The Daily Telegraph ), reading "
Why men of Jewish blood shed it for Adolf Hitler". Answer that.

I can't. Nor can anybody else. I am a Jew, and thus to be hated by Nazis; very 
well, I understand that, and shrug. But Mr Rigg has not just found a cache of 
almost unbelievable matter about Hitler's Reich and its evil madness, he has 
pointed a dagger at some of the newly known facts of the Holoc
aust, and - well, let me say it again: "Why men of Jewish blood shed it for 
Adolf Hitler". For they did, they did, they did.

Have you ever heard of Major Robert Bor chardt? No? Nor had I until very 
recently. He was a half-Jew, and a very brave man, and a very great fighter on 
Hitler's side. He did not commit atrocities, nor did he allow them in his 
units. He fought in Russia, in Rommel's Afrika Korps, and he was strew
n with medals. Not long before he died, he spoke to the children of his old 
school, and this is what he said: "Many German Jews and half-Jews who fought in 
the First World War and even in the Second World War believed that they should 
honour their Fatherland by serving in the military." And many
 of them did.

But what I want to know, and I imagine many others want to know, is what did 
Jews think they were doing when they were fighting for Hitler? Take the 
remarkable story - a perfectly true story - of the way Rabbi Schneerson was 
saved from the Nazis. The rabbi was the leader of the most ultra-orthod
ox Jews, and when the war broke he was trapped, and very likely to be killed by 
Hitler. There was a plea from the United States to let the Rabbi Schneerson go. 
It was touch and go; but then another German Jew, fighting in the war on the 
side of Hitler, took a hand: he was a very high officer, Er
nst Bloch, who had fought in the First World War, and Schneerson was saved.

And saved in the most macabre manner imaginable. Admiral Canaris recruited 
Bloch, and then Hitler made the world go round the other way; with a half-Jew 
staring him in his face, Hitler read the appropriate document: "I, Adolf 
Hitler, leader of the German nation, approve Major Ernst Bloch to be o
f German blood. However, after the war, Ernst Bloch will be re-evaluated to see 
if he is still worthy to have such a title." (Who said Hitler was sane?)

But still the question must be asked and answered, why men of Jewish blood shed 
it for Adolf Hitler.

Most of those men are now dead, and the dead cannot speak. If they could speak, 
what might they say? There would be many who would say "I didn't know - how 
could I know? The whole world was there, and nobody knew - nobody knew what 
that man called Hitler would do to the world and millions upon m
illions."

Not enough. Not enough. You, the ones who were there, could see. Oh no, very 
few indeed could have guessed the whole of the madness (though even that could 
have been spotted and was by the tiny number who could read Mein Kampf from 
beginning to end), but that was not enough.

Very well, not enough. What next? We must try to think into the minds of the 
survivors, and what they did and what lies they told. There is a very old man, 
82 and failing, who has asked for anonymity; he shall have it. But he says that 
he served 6 1/2 years in Hitler's military, and became a cap
tain. Presumably he drew the curtains when a Nazi went by. That's small fry. 
What about a real field marshal, a good friend of Goering and indeed a very 
important figure in the Nazi camp, for it was he who made the Luftwaffe the 
tremendous thing it became. That was Field Marshal Milch, and he wa
s a Jew. But a field marshal, surely, should know better. And so should a Jew.

Surely should? Did. Did. We come back to where we started. But not quite. For 
we now know the massive quantities of horror that poured out of Bryan Rigg's 
find. (It was luck, of a kind: he had just come out of a cinema and started to 
chat to another cinema-goer, a German, whereupon they began to
 speak, and the other man spoke of his life, whereupon "they talked until 
dawn". I bet they did.)

We come back to where we started yet again. What were real Jews or even 
half-Jews (and there were many of these) doing with Adolf Hitler? True, there 
were people who saw through Hitler very quickly, but were sure that he would be 
a busted flush in no time. Well, he wasn't, and in the end the blo
od poured copiously. And there was no shortage of important people; Helmut 
Schmidt, who became the Chancellor of West Germany for eight years, had when 
somewhat younger been very much in the wrong place.

This is yet another question that cannot be answered unless the dead rise from 
the grave to give the answers. It would be dreadful to say that the dead 
deserved what they got, because they didn't. Again, we hear the terrible words 
- how could we have known?

Perhaps the most pitiful or most deserved - you can take it either way - is 
that of Milch, the one who was "a personal friend of Hermann Goering." And 
instantly the thunder rolls; how does a Jew become a personal friend of Hermann 
Goering, and more to the point, why is he prepared to be one in t
he first place?

Milch was tried and convicted in the Nuremberg war trials; his Jewishness did 
not help him, and he was imprisoned for ten years. But again and again, we ask 
the question, the question that cannot be answered. What was a Jew, or a 
half-Jew, doing with Adolf Hitler? God forbid that I should take s
ides in such a dreadful argument. It is enough that almost all the people 
concerned are now dead. But if they came to life, would they not instantly go 
back into the shades?
-=-=-=-==-
Western Imperative Network (WIN)
http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm

National Alliance 
http://www.natall.com




From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:17:15 EST 1998
Article: 64337 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 98 06:34:29 GMT
Subject: Re: UNIVERSALITY IN RACE, LANGUAGE, RELIGION AND CULTURE
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.white-power,soc.culture.usa
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
References: <01bd37ad$c4db05c0$0f645c89@dambiec>
Lines: 254
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.62
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!fu-berlin.de!newsfeed.direct.ca!news.he.net!news.randori.com!205.218.162.62
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64130 alt.discrimination:64337 alt.politics.white-power:115872 soc.culture.usa:199713

On 2/12/98 6:03AM, in message <01bd37ad$c4db05c0$0f645c89@dambiec>, 
"Dharmadeva"  wrote:

> Though there are some apparent or prima facie differences in
> language, colour, etc. in human beings, still in all
> essential matters they come from the same source, they
> originate from One Singular Entity - Parama Purusa.



 The real "lambert@morgan.net" speaks:

Good Gosh! One has bipassed a whole *science* dedicated
to Anthropology.



>  There
> may be linguistic differences, colour differences, national
> differences, but all these are external and apparent.

"Race is soul seen from within." --Alfred Rosenberg

 Genetics determine color differences. I believe mutations
are responsible for altering characteristics of different
peoples.



>  It is
> the language of the heart, the language of sentiment, and
> not the language of the tongue, that should be heard.


I believe etymology (the study of language and its origins)
and philogy to be a scientific study of language and it should
be heard too.


>  No
> language can claim to be an original language - neither
> English, nor Telegu nor Bengali. The English language is not
> an original language.

The very word *English* is derived from the original tribes
of "Angles" who carried this Germanic tongue to the Isles of
Ole Albion herself. It was pure 1500 years ago.


>  Nine hundred years ago there was no
> English language,

The English language still exists. I believe I am writing it at the
very moment. 



>  one thousand-five hundred years ago there
> was no Bengali language and eight hundred years ago there
> were no Angika, Maithili and Assamese languages. Modern
> English is a mixture of the Scotch tongue, the old Norman
> tongue, the Anglo-Saxon tongue, the Briton tongue, the
> Celtic tongue, and the Latin and Greek tongues.

 When a language lacks certain concepts, it borrows them from
related groups. Geographical seperation of a few select groups
speaking the same language evolve differently. Has one noticed
that the English-descended Americans of the American South have
a distinct dilect different from their lineal brethren of England?

You fail to realize that English was a pure Germanic tongue at
one period in time and that the 'loan' words and grammar were
borrowed by their distant and racially related kinsmen who spoke
an Indo-European tongue.

> Similarly, no race
> can claim the absolute purity of its blood.

Wow! The English language is descended from the same Indo-Europeans
who originally spoke it as Low German and borrowed certain words
>from  their seperated and related kinsmen who spoke a similar,
yet isolated tongue. I personally do not know how you can make
the claim that "race and language are synonomous." Organically
they are, but the universalists and race-mixers preach that
they are haughty and 'dirty.'



>  Hitler's clam
> about the purity of Aryan blood was to mislead the people.

Sigh! You are trampling on my historical grounds. The Offical
Handbook of the Hitler Youth states on page 16:

Nordic sub-race...........50 percent
Eastern sub-race..........20 percent
Dinaric sub-race..........15 percent
East Baltic sub-race......8 percent
Phalic sub-race...........5 percent

This was the racial make-up of the German nation in the early 1930's.

 Again, you fail to scientifically and rationally explain your rather
baseless arguments. There are no "mixed-races." There are only hybridized
individuals. Races will always exist -- however often one tries to mix
them. The Austrians are a great example of this process over the past
1200 years by the fusion of Nordic and Nordic-Alpine genes. They are
a nearly homogenous sub-race.




> In Europe alone there are so many races such as the Nordic,
> Mediterranean, Alpine and Greek races.


Yes, but aren't these races seperated along ethnic lines in
nation-states?


>  In India there are
> Austrics, Austrico-Negroids, Dravidians, MongoloNegroids,
> and the like.


 True, but has India ever been a real nation-state?


>  Therefore, no race is absolutely free from
> blending. Everywhere there is universal blending. Nowhere in
> the world will you find a single original race and language.

 Please visit Iceland, Norway, and Sweden. Also visit the
North Arizona Injun tribe known as the "Havasuapi."



> Human society is a singular entity.

Based on what foundations? "Human society" did not produce the
Western world, nor did you Orientalists.



>  All the merits and
> demerits of the society are ours.

You didn't give my ancestors chivalry or the Eddas. We produced
them ourselves.



>  They are our common
> patrimony. It is foolishness to claim that the merits are
> ours and the demerits are someone else's. In this universe
> all entities are divine; only people have to realise it.

Superstitious are we? Please learn to think rationally.



> Nobody is helpless or alone in this universe. We have
> mundane, supramundane and spiritual relationships with the
> universe.

Heee-heeee. "For mankind." What ever happened to "diversity?"
The Universe is boring without different peoples and cultures.
I champion a pluri-verse and not pluralistic-nation-states.




>  So it is the bounden duty of human beings to
> expand their mental arena because basically all finite
> entities have the inherent wont of universal pervasion.




> Their goal is the Supreme Entity who is free from
> limitations. Human beings will have to expand themselves so
> much that they will go beyond the fetters of limitations.
> There cannot be and should not be an inferiority or
> superiority complex in anybody.

Nature does not realize your "equality" based theories. People
are not equal. In traditional western philosophy the dregs of
society were to remain at the bottom while the "natural aristoi"
rose to the top of a hierarchal structure.



>  Those who preach individual
> racial superiority are committing sins.

 Sins against whom? A supernatural diety? Or nature?




>  They are going
> against human Dharma. Like earth, air and water, Dharma is
> common to one and all. Human beings will have to become one
> with the Universal Entity.

 People are different! Spirituallity is man-made and invented
out of a psychological need. Man looks to nature or creates myths
with his imagination for a world outlook.


 I follow CULTURE! One may ask for a definition:

 My dictionary states:

 "The integrated pattern of human knowledge, belief and behavior that
depends upon (and rovides the foundation) for man's capacity for learning
and transmitting knowledge to succeeding generations; the customary beliefs,
social forms and material traits of a racial, religious, or social group."

 What is defined here is the matrix upon which all human values and
progress depend, and without which men would be an atomized group of
grunting savages living in perpetual squalor. It is culture and only
culture that gives men a foundation for life above the animal.

 A culture -- any culture -- is the product of the history of a specific
group -- any group -- since before the memory of man. It is the sum total
of the group's historical experience. It is all of the popular conclusions
and prejudicess and common wisdom that have developed over the eons and
which are embedded in the group's consciousness: their mores and habits,
their do's and don'ts.

 Do you agree with my statement?

 I personally tire of the "New Age" types who preach that Hinduism
is based on Vedic relgion, of course, which is notoriously false.
They say the Vedic religion is about "peace and love," etc. This
is contradictory. If one has ever read the Bhagavad Gita, one realizes
that the soldier Arjuna is commanded by Krishna to "stop sulking and
get up and slay your enemies."



> 
>        The famous American poet Karl Sandburg proclaimed
> "There is only one man in the world, And his name is All
> Men. There is only one woman in the world, And her name is
> All Women. There is only one child in the world, And the
> child's name is All Children."
*****
Western Imperative Netork (WIN)
http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm

National Alliance-Europeans Only!
http://www.natall.com



From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:17:15 EST 1998
Article: 64340 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 98 12:45:53 GMT
Subject: Re:Universality in Race
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,soc.culture.usa
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 9
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.62
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!Supernews73!supernews.com!news.he.net!news.randori.com!205.218.162.62
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64139 alt.discrimination:64340 soc.culture.usa:199764


 wooo! What a repetitious post I sent yesterday. I was too
tired to properly function or comprehend writing a better response.
-=-=-
Western Imperative Network (Great Site!)
http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm

National Alliance-Europeans Only
http://www.natall.com



From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:17:16 EST 1998
Article: 64356 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 98 12:47:52 GMT
Subject: A Religion for Aryans
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,soc.culture.usa
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 388
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.53
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!Supernews73!supernews.com!news.he.net!news.randori.com!205.218.162.53
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64213 alt.discrimination:64356 soc.culture.usa:200083

A RELIGION FOR ARYANS 

by Professor Revilo P. Oliver 

(Liberty Bell, December 1986) 

  

Many believe that, as is quite possible, a large population of mediocrities 
requires the spiritual sustinence of a religion that promises survival after 
death as a compensation for the inevitable disappointments and sorrows of human 
life. If that is so, a replacement must be found for the demora
lizing cult of the Jew-god that has, for fifteen centuries, blighted our race 
and sapped its vital instincts. And if the substitute religion is not to impair 
our race's vitality, it must be in harmony with the Aryan psyche. 

An attempt to design and launch such a religion is being made by a group who 
call themselves Reincarnation, Incorporated, with perhaps a gentle pun in the 
title. Their initial promotion is a forty-page tabloid paper, oddly but 
cleverly entitled What Is, of which seventy thousand copies are said 
to have been distributed from the new Delphi (P.O.Box 3009, Agoura Hills, 
California). A second printing of the same quantity is in prospect to recruit 
more "New Age Activists," as members of the cult like to call themselves. 

The obvious basis for an Aryan religion is the doctrine of metempsychosis, 
which is congenial to our racial psyche and was a faith held wherever our race 
established its superiority, from India to Scandinavia. It reappears, with only 
a little modification, in Schopenhauer's doctrine of the palin
genesis of the will.(1) It is foreign to all the Semitic religions, and appears 
among Mongolians only under the influence of Buddhism, which was exported from 
India to China. 

(footnote 1. Schopenhauer drew inspiration for much of his philosophy from the 
fifty Upanisads that he read in the Latin translation by Anquetil Duperron 
(Strassburg, 2 vols., 1801-1802), of which he said (Parerga, II, 185), "It has 
been the most elevating reading which (with the exception of th
e original text) there can possibly be in the world. It has been the solace of 
my life, and will be of my death.") 

Belief in the transmigration of souls is not inherently unreasonable. It is 
untainted by the trumpery 'revelations' and preposterously childish tales of 
the Jewish concoction called Christianity. Since souls are, by definition, 
invisible and impalpable, one cannot prove that they do not exist an
d do not act as a catalyst, so to speak, in initiating and maintaining the 
chemical and bio-electrical reaction called life. And if souls exist as a kind 
of subtle energy, the transfer of the undetectable spark from one organism to 
another would conform to a psychic law of the conservation of en
ergy, and one could, of course, give the doctrine a now fashionable embroidery 
by discoursing on analogies with quantum mechanics. A soul thus conceived could 
be the real personality of an individual, and not entirely irrational 
explanations can be found for an incarnate soul's inability to reme
mber its previous incarnations. Unlike other religions, a faith in 
metempsychosis need involve nothing that is demonstrably false. 

The doctrine of metempsychosis was brought to its fullest and most logical form 
by the Aryans of India, who perfected it by combining with it the concept of 
karma (karman).(2) This produces a grandiose system of psychic evolution that 
neatly parallels the scientific fact of biological evolution.
 The individual soul is presumed to have begun with the lowest and simplest 
form of organic life and to have developed itself, through its experiences and 
actions in each incarnation, ascending gradually to ever higher forms of life 
and eventually to the higher mammals, who become capable of con
scious moral activity. By the time that we become human beings (perhaps even 
before), the moral quality of an individual's actions automatically determine, 
by an unalterable natural law, his social status and his fate (i.e., what 
happens to him, as distinct from what he does voluntarily) in his 
next incarnation. If he discharges faithfully his moral obligations in the 
status in which he is born, he will have a higher (and morally more demanding) 
status in his next life; if, on the other hand, he violates the morality of the 
natural law, he will revert to a lower social status and suffe
r in it condign tribulations, or, if his guilt exceeds such demotion, he 
reverts to a subhuman mammal and has to progress to human form once more. 

(footnote 2. When one cites Sanskrit nouns and adjectives, one does not give 
the nominative singular, as in Greek and Latin, but the special base, or 
'pausa,' form that is used in dictionaries and in grammatical treatises, from 
which the inflected cases are derived.) 

This is, of course, a rational religion. Karma is governed by a natural law 
inherent, like gravitation, in the structure of the universe. There is no need 
for a theodicy, the intellectual reef on which all monotheist religions are 
wrecked. There is no need for a creator of an eternal universe an
d no function for a god who intervenes in human affairs. One of the six 
orthodox religious philosophies of India, the Nirisvara-Samkhya, is frankly 
atheistic in the sense that it excludes a creating or governing god, although 
it does admit higher forms of life to which humans may evolve and thus
 become beings that are superhuman, just as we are supersimian. 

If you must have a god, the alternate (Sesvara) system will give you one who is 
like the god in Plato's Politicus: he designed and fashioned the perfect 
mechanism of the universe and, after setting it in motion, left it to function 
automatically, giving no further attention to it and its inhabit
ants. Only fools would try to attract his attention by performing childish 
rites or whimpering prayers, but by the moral law of the universe austerities 
and self-mortification automatically (and regardless of an individual's intent 
in performing them) release the cosmic energy of tapas and thus 
confer psychic powers that may be exerted in this or in subsequent lives. 

You will have seen that this is also a socially perfect religion. However 
disagreeable may be your present status in life and however great may be the 
injustice and suffering that you must endure, you are thus expiating your moral 
errors in a preceding life, while your fortitude in accepting wit
hout protest the consequences of your past immorality automatically generates 
the moral quality that will raise you to a higher status in your next life. The 
doctrine even reconciles the races: a nigger is assured that by good conduct he 
can ascend racially and eventually be born an Aryan.(3) A 
society that fully accepts the belief in karma is one in which discontent, 
social agitation, political conflict, and revolutions are all impossible. 

(footnote 3. The stages of transition from the Vedas to the doctrine of the 
later Upanisads is obscure, but one conjecture, drawn from the term dvija 
('born again'), applied only to Aryans, is that originally only Aryans were 
thought capable of reincarnation, while black-skinned Dravidians and a
pes were thought to perish like all other lower mammals. That was a 
biologically wholesome attitude, and an historian may regret that it was 
superseded by formulation of the complete scheme of spiritual evolution called 
karma. By another conjecture, one regarding the origin of the caste system, 
one can suppose that the civilized white race that preceded the Aryans in the 
Indus Valley was included among the 'born again.') 

Such is the perfectly logical and coherent religion that the Aryans in India 
fashioned from the religion of the Rg-veda that was theirs when they invaded 
that sub-continent and which they never formally repudiated, despite the 
implications of the doctrine I set forth above.(4) The older religion
 and its analogues naturally dominated the great literature in Sanskrit. All 
belief in hyper-physical phenomena was, for a time, challenged by the strictly 
rational and materialistic (i.e., scientific) conception of the universe and 
life called Lokayata.(5) The religious conceptions of India wer
e profoundly perturbed and altered by the disastrous and egalitarian heresy 
called Buddhism, a religion that had been fashioned from gross perversion of 
the austere and profoundly pessimistic philosophy of Gautama. And the common 
people, increasingly mongrelized by miscegenation in defiance of t
he Aryan Laws of Manu, while never doubting metempsychosis, sought to evade 
natural law by magic, that is, by invoking the intervention of a god (e.g., 
Krishna) or goddess (e.g, Kali) whom they pleased and flattered by sacrifices 
and other acts of special devotion. 

(footnote 4. I have given a concise, perhaps too concise, summary of Hindu 
religions and religious philosophies in Appendices A, B, and C to my 
translation of the Mrcchakatika (Little Clay Cart); cf. Appendices D, E, and L. 
The essentials can be learned from any good reference work.) 

(footnote 5. In a very early article, written with Spenglerian fatalism, I 
wrote: "We need not be astonished that Hindu skepticism enjoyed only a 
relatively brief existence: no malism was ever more than transitory, for in 
philosophy, as in daily life, men are naturally cowards and optimists. "Sk
epsis" always consumes itself; it is a brilliant flame that, like a magnesium 
flare, bursts forth for a moment in the tenebrous night, and then vanishes, 
leaving the darkness more impenetrable than ever." According to Spengler, 
gerontic civilizations enter a period of "second religiosity" before
 they die; we may now have reached that stage. Other and perhaps better 
explanations are possible, such as the observed decline of the level of 
intelligence in proletarian and multiracial societies, or the necessary effect 
of a civilization that contravenes the innate instincts of our species. (
I am thinking of an extremely important article by Alan McGregor that will 
appear in a coming issue of the Mankind Quarterly; I plan to consider it in 
connection with the phenomena of sexual perversion.)) 

It would be pointless to mention here the wild variety of grotesque sects, each 
with its gang of holy men intent on exploiting the superstitions of the 
populace, that flourish in modern India, but it may be relevant to give a 
glimpse of the corruption of the old Aryan conception of reincarnation
 and karma among the most highly cultivated Hindus of the age that followed the 
rise of Buddhism in India. A good example is one of the great works of Sanskrit 
literature, the Kadambari of Bana (completed after his death, c. A.D. 650, by 
his less talented son). It is written in the ornate and al
embicated prose that is esteemed as more poetic than verse -- a mannered and 
artificial style that reminds one of Euphuism, but paradoxically also reminds 
one of the German style of Kant, for, given the incomparable lexical and 
syntactical suppleness of Sanskrit, it can be said of Bana, as it wa
s of Kant, that he often dives into a sentence and comes up, several pages 
later, with the verb in his mouth. The Kadambari is a work that was accessible 
only to the most highly cultivated readers.(6) 

(footnote 6. If you have sufficiently mastered Sanskrit to read the Mahabharata 
or the Kathasaritsagara without difficulty, you will find that reading Bana is 
like breaking trail in three feet of snow. There is an English translation by 
C. M. Ridding (1906), which I have not seen. Aside from the
 inimitably ornate and poetic diction, Bana's work has a considerable charm in 
its sensitivity to the beauties of nature, but the late Arthur Berriedale 
Keith, the foremost authority on Sanskrit literature, was certainly right in 
saying that it will seem fantastic, uninteresting, and tedious to 
readers who have no settled belief in metempsychosis.) 

The story opens at the court of a famous king and dramatist, Sudraka, whose 
very name shows that he was not a true Aryan. (He cannot have been a Sudra, but 
he probably was a hybrid like Dumas, his father's Aryan blood mingled with that 
of a woman of lower race.) To him comes a Candala, a maiden 
of wondrous beauty, although she belongs to the very lowest and most despised 
caste.(7) (Don't worry: you will eventually discover she is the goddess Lakshmi 
in disguise.) She presents to the king a learned and eloquent parrot, who, 
after composing verses in the king's honor, narrates a long and
 intricate romance, inset with subordinate stories, which is the body of the 
work but need not be outlined here. The wise parrot's discourse causes the 
"veil of ignorance" to fall from before the king's eyes, and he learns of his 
earlier incarnations on earth and, at the behest of the disguised 
Lakshmi before she ascends to heaven, he dies and eventually discovers that he 
is really Lord of the Night, Regent of the Moon. His terrestrial sufferings 
have atoned for the moral lapse that brought upon him the curse that sent him 
to earth, so he rejoins his favorite wife and wins Kadambari, t
he maiden whom he especially loves and long desired in vain. The three 
thereafter dwell in his lunar orb, together with their friends and associates, 
but from time to time revisit the two terrestrial kingdoms that belong to them. 

(footnote 7. The offspring of a white woman of the highest primary caste by a 
brown-skinned male of the lowest is the result of miscegenation so monstrous 
that he (or she) is particularly accursed. The descendants of such persons are 
Candalas; they are legally dead and must carry rattles to warn
 of their approach so that decent persons can avoid the loathesome sight. They 
serve as executioners and porters of corpses, since they cannot be more 
polluted than they are by birth. They are, however, morally superior to 
Englishmen and Americans, who commit the heinous crime of eating beef and
 will therefore be reborn as pigs or worse.) 

You will not need to be shown how drastically this story departs from the basic 
simplicity and rationality of the Aryan doctrine of karma that I outlined 
above. I have mentioned it expressly to show how the pure doctrine of karma can 
survive contamination by notions of deities who intervene in e
arthly affairs, incarnate divinities, and even the mystical efficacy of 
curses.(8) That should make us cautious in criticizing modern adaptations of 
the doctrine that are designed for popularity today. 

(footnote 8. The parrot is an estimable young man who was reborn as a parrot 
because he was cursed, not by a holy man as is so common in Hindu story, but 
only by a maiden whom he had wearied with protestations of love.) 

The concept of a transmigration of souls is, as I have said, native to our 
race. It reappeared frequently in the literature of the Nineteenth Century 
(e.g., in two of Edgar Allan Poe's most memorable short stories or Theophile 
Gautier's Avatar). Langdon Smith spontaneously saw the parallel betwe
en metempsychosis and biological evolution in his one well-known poem, "When 
you were a tadpole and I was a fish,/ In the Paleozoic time." In our century, 
the concept has been popularized by the "memories" of "Bridey" Murphy, Joan 
Grant, "Taylor Caldwell" (Mrs. Marcus Reback), and others. The do
ctrine, furthermore, is susceptible of a kind of "proof." 

Most literate persons read in their youth vivid tales set in ancient or 
transcendentally exotic cultures, such as Ryder Haggard's She, Flaubert's 
Salammbo, Georg Ebers' Der Kaiser, Merejkowski's Tutenchamon auf Kreta, 
Maseras' Ildaribal, Pierre Louys' Aphrodite, or any of a hundred others. Such 
stories, set in a panorama of a vanished civilization, make a deep impression 
on the minds of youthful readers, but fade from the conscious mind in 
subsequent decades. As the readers, especially if they are female, approach or 
enter middle age, their youthful impressions can be recalled in hypno
sis; they may spontaneously mistake them for memories of a past incarnation, 
and they will almost certainly do so, if they have been prepared for a "past 
life regression" by a skilled hypnotist. 

There should, therefore, be a large and active market for a new religion based 
on metempsychosis and karma, now that Mme. Blavatsky's Theosophy is quite worn 
out. It is not easy, however, to estimate the potential of Reincarnation, 
Incorporated. 

The forty pages of its tabloid, half of them written by one man, are chiefly 
devoted to glowing descriptions of how wonderful it is to be a "New Age 
Activist," and they have comparatively little to say about a specific 
metaphysical doctrine. One principal theme is a vehement but entirely justifi
ed polemic against the Jesus-jerks of the "Moral Majority" and "New Christian 
Right," who are so lavishly promoted by the Jews' boob-tubes and have already 
excited such mindless fanaticism that one of the chief hokum-peddlers has set 
himself up as a candidate for the Presidency, and the Revoluti
onary Tribunal in Washington has shown ominous signs of coming to a working 
agreement with the crude communism of early Judaeo-Christian cults. One can 
only applaud the polemic, which gives the new religion a present utility. 

The bits of doctrine that one can gather from obiter dicta scattered through 
the forty pages indicate that the basic doctrines of karma have been 
incorporated in an odd mishmash. The sect teaches acceptance of the world as it 
is, and that is good, but then we encounter a blob of Christian sentim
entality in the strange affirmation that "the Law of Grace supersedes the Law 
of Karma... All your positive and loving thoughts and actions go to cancel out 
your stored-up bad karma." Now this directly contravenes the basic doctrine, 
according to which sentiments and thoughts have no effect in t
hemselves, and actions are all that count. The word karman means 'an act, 
deed,' and is in some writings taken as an antithesis to belief and the kind of 
thought that does not result in physical action. Thus karmanurupa may designate 
what is in accord with a constant action or function, such as 
a chemical reaction, as well as the conduct and fate of a man that are in 
accord with his actions in a previous life. It is the latter conception, of 
course, that is fundamental to the religio-philosophical doctrine that takes 
its name from karman. 

Then we are told "everyone is here on earth to fulfill their [sic] dharma and 
to resolve their karma by rising above fear and learning to express 
unconditional love." I am not sure what this means. Dharma is 'duty, propriety, 
justice,' and hence the prescribed conduct of a man (or woman) in the 
social status and position to which he (or she) has been born. Fulfilling those 
obligations faithfully advances one spiritually; violation of that duty will 
result in rebirth in a lower and more unpleasant status. It is the dharma of a 
slave to serve his master loyally; the dharma of a soldier, 
to slay the enemies of his king; and the dharma of a king (as is so clearly 
stated in the famous Arthasastra ), to be merciless toward criminals and 
subversives, and to root them out, even by using a corps of "agents 
provocateurs." There isn't a word about bubbling with love, conditional or unco
nditional. 

The "New Age Activists," we are told, "will be an army of people armed with 
love" and they will "replace repression and fear with peace and light." So we 
end with more of the old buncombe. Such pie may be served in the sky, but it 
will never be found on earth, and it is a great disservice to aro
use an appetite for an imaginary confection. I suppose this nonsense was put in 
to stimulate the glands of compulsive do-gooders. 

I refrain from commenting on the two-page spiel by a certain Joseph Goldstein, 
who twice assures us that "Sexual misconduct can most easily be understood as 
refraining [!] from those actions of sensuality which cause pain and harm to 
others." If he means what he says, he should laud the famous M
arquis de Sade, who was most emphatically not guilty of such misconduct. 

What is most disturbing is that Reincarnation, Incorporated, carries with it a 
whole passel of fakirs and mystery-mongers, all eager to perform magic if you 
cross their palms with silver. One female will bang a Tibetan gong (probably 
made in Brooklyn) to help you remember your past lives in Tibe
t and to "facilitate...the rising of the Kundalini." I forbear asking about her 
qualifications, but in my quite limited reading in the sources, if memory does 
not deceive me, it was implied that only males have a kundalini, a cute psychic 
snake that issues from the sexual organs, climbs up the s
pine, and enters the brain to fill it with transcendence. 

There are "psychics" who will read your destiny from tea leaves, from quartz 
crystals (giving you "crystal energetics"), from the palms of your hands, just 
as they used to do in the tents of the old carnivals. "International 
authorities" will teach you how to raise your "vibrational level" and w
ill introduce you to "spirit guides," just waiting to act as your unseen (but 
not unpaid) cicerone and show you the sights of spookland; how to have fun in 
trances, even if you don't know what you are doing; how to work up enough 
"psychic ability" to remember at least three of your past lives; a
nd how to get such a big dose of awareness that you will be "attuned to the 
awesome power that guides the universe" and make "love's psychic dimensions" 
work for you. "Top parapsychologists" will teach you how to have "extra-sensory 
perception" and "nurture your ESP ability," to the astonishment
 of your friends. (That should be lots of fun, but my guess is that any 
card-shark could teach you more about stacking a deck of cards and would do it 
for less.) And to complete the show, there are astrologers all over the lot, 
and all of them have got computers now and can tell you with scienti
fic accuracy just what the planets, including Pluto and, I suppose, the larger 
asteroids, such as Vesta, Ceres, and Pallas, are going to do to you tomorrow. 
One wizard, who has the same address as Reincarnation, Incorporated, will, for 
only $16.00, jiggle his "IBM System 36" computer for you and
 give you a print-out to "bring energy to each part of your personality" and, 
you know, a big computer like that just couldn't make a mistake. 

Now I am sure that some prospective customers will be repelled by some or all 
of those side-shows and turn away from the main tent, and others will be 
displeased by the somewhat inept collocation on page 9 of "the liberal 
leadership, New Age practitioners, homosexuals (estimated at over 40 milli
on)" as three groups, presumably equally precious, who will be run into "Nazi 
death camps," if the awful "Fascists" get control after the impending collapse 
of this ruined and bankrupt country. What I do not profess to know is what 
percentage of potential customers will be alienated by such ingr
edients in the mishmash. 

The potentiality of Reincarnation, Incorporated, furthermore, is delimited by 
the fact that if a new religion is to attract multitudes, it must exhibit a 
great novelty and seem to be radically new. It must differ drastically from all 
religions in vogue when it is introduced. The new cult, howeve
r, offers only crambe repetita, warmed-over cabbage. The chatter about "love" 
and "higher consciousness" and "transcendental values" that Theosophy peddled 
in its hey-day, when such figments of the imagination differed attractively 
>from  the dreary quibbles of Christian theology, are now stale an
d tedious; they are offered today by a hundred competing sects and with only 
slight variations. 

To give a specific example: What does Reincarnation, Incorporated, offer that 
is not also offered by the Stelle Group, which I mentioned obiter in Liberty 
Bell, August 1984, p. 13? The differences are only in the trimmings of the 
worn-out garments. 

If a new religion based on metempsychosis and karma is to command wide 
adherence, it must offer some doctrine that is not now tediously familiar to 
everyone who has gone shopping in the salvation-marts. 

In sum, then, I am inclined to believe that the new religion is perhaps fatally 
flawed as it comes from its makers, and I should suppose that it has little 
chance of becoming more than just another weird cult for people who want to 
believe whatever is incredible. But when I remember the jumble o
f inconsistent and even antithetical ideas in all of the most popular cults in 
India, of which the best is illustrated by the Kadambari, I prudently refrain 
>from  categorical predictions about what Weishaupt's "marvellous mind of man" 
cannot be made to believe.
-=-=-=-=-=
Western Imperative Network (WIN)
http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm

National Alliance
http://www.natall.com





From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:17:16 EST 1998
Article: 64364 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 98 12:58:20 GMT
Subject: Thomas Jefferson on Race
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,alt.journalism,alt.politics.usa,soc.culture.usa,triangle.politics
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 306
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.55
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!tor-nx1.netcom.ca!news3.bellglobal.com!news1.bellglobal.com!news-pen-1.sprintlink.net!news-east.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news-backup-east.sprintlink.net!news-in-east.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!207.20.0.50!peerfeed.ncal.verio.net!WCG!news.randori.com!205.218.162.55
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64223 alt.discrimination:64364 alt.journalism:82804 alt.politics.usa.misc:159992 soc.culture.usa:200121 triangle.politics:29298









Thomas Jefferson on Race and Slavery


>from  Notes on the State of Virginia (Boston, 1829), pages 144-151, 169-171.


[Note: For easier reading, I've taken the liberty of breaking some Jefferson's 
long paragraphs. Ed.]

It will probably be asked, Why not retain and incorporate the blacks into the 
state, and thus save the expense of supplying, by importation of white 
settlers, the vacancies they will leave? Deep rooted prejudices entertained by 
the whites; ten thousand recollections, by the blacks, of the injuri
es they have sustained; new provocations; the real distinctions which nature 
has made; and many other circumstances, will divide us into parties, and 
produce convulsions, which will probably never end but in the extermination of 
the one or the other race. - To these objections, which are politic
al, may be added others, which are physical and moral. 

The first difference which strikes us is that of colour. - Whether the black of 
the negro resides in the reticular membrane between the skin and scarf-skin, or 
in the scarf-skin itself; whether it proceeds from the colour of the blood, the 
colour of the bile, or from that of some other secretion
, the difference is fixed in nature, and is as real as if its seat and cause 
were better known to us. And is this difference of no importance? Is it not the 
foundation of a greater or less share of beauty in the two races? Are not the 
fine mixtures of red and white, the expressions of every pass
ion by greater or less suffusions of colour in the one, preferable to that 
eternal monotony, which reigns in the countenances, that immovable veil of 
black which covers all the emotions of the other race? Add to these, flowing 
hair, a more elegant symmetry of form, their own judgment in favour o
f the whites, declared by their preference of them, as uniformly as is the 
preference of the Orangotan for the black women over those of his own species. 
The circumstance of Superior beauty, is thought worthy attention in the 
propagation of our horses, dogs, and other domestic animals; why not i
n that of man? 

Besides those of colour, figure, and hair, there are other physical 
distinctions proving a difference of race. They have less hair on the face and 
body. They secrete less by the kidneys, and more by the glands of the skin, 
which gives them a very strong and disagreeable odour. This greater degre
e of transpiration renders them more tolerant of heat, and less so of cold than 
the whites. Perhaps too a difference of structure in the pulmonary apparatus, 
which a late ingenious experimentalist has discovered to be the principal 
regulator of animal heat, may have disabled them from extricatin
g, in the act of inspiration, so much of that fluid from the outer air, or 
obliged them in expiration, to part with more of it. They seem to require less 
sleep. A black after hard labour through the day, will be induced by the 
slightest amusements to sit up till midnight, or later, though knowin
g he must be out with the first dawn of the morning. They are at least as 
brave, and more adventuresome. But this may perhaps proceed from a want of 
forethought, which prevents their seeing a danger till it be present..- When 
present, they do not go through it with more coolness or steadiness th
an the whites. They are more ardent after their female: but love seems with 
them to be more an eager desire, than a tender delicate mixture of sentiment 
and sensation. Their griefs are transient. Those numberless afflictions, which 
render it doubtful whether heaven has given life to us in mercy 
or in wrath, are less felt, and sooner forgotten with them. In general, their 
existence appears to participate more of sensation than reflection. To this 
must be ascribed their disposition to sleep when abstracted from their 
diversions, and unemployed in labour. An animal whose body is at rest, 
and who does not reflect, must be disposed to sleep of course. Comparing them 
by their faculties of memory, reason, and imagination, it appears to me that in 
memory they are equal to the whites; in reason much inferior, as I think one 
could scarcely be found capable of tracing and comprehending 
the investigations of Euclid; and that in imagination they are dull, tasteless, 
and anomalous. It would be unfair to follow them to Africa for this 
investigation. 

We will consider them here, on the same stage with the whites, and where the 
facts are not apocryphal on which a judgment is to be formed. It will be right 
to make great allowances for the difference of condition, of education, of 
conversation, of the sphere in which they move. Many millions of 
them have been brought to, and born in America. Most of them indeed have been 
confined to tillage, to their own homes, and their own society: yet many have 
been so situated, that they might have availed themselves of the conversation 
of their masters; many have been brought up to the handicraft 
arts, and from that circumstance have always been associated with the whites. 
Some have been liberally educated, and all have lived in countries where the 
arts and sciences are cultivated to a considerable degree, and have had before 
their eyes samples of the best works from abroad. 

The Indians, with no advantages of this kind, will often carve figures on their 
pipes not destitute of design and merit. They will crayon out an animal, a 
plant, or a country, so as to prove the existence of a germ in their minds 
which only wants cultivation. They astonish you with strokes of th
e most sublime oratory; such as prove their reason and sentiment strong, their 
imagination glowing and elevated. 

But never yet could I find that a black had uttered a thought above the level 
of plain narration; never saw even an elementary trait of painting or 
sculpture. In music they are more generally gifted than the whites with 
accurate ears for tune and time, and they have been found capable of imagini
ng a small catch. [FN1] Whether they will be equal to the composition of a more 
extensive run of melody, or of complicated harmony, is yet to be proved. Misery 
is often the parent of the most affecting touches in poetry. Among the blacks 
is misery enough, God knows, but no poetry. Love is the pe
culiar oestrum of the poet. Their love is ardent, but it kindles the senses 
only, not the imagination. Religion indeed has produced a Phyllis Whately but 
it could not produce a poet. The compositions published under her name are 
below the dignity of criticism. The heroes of the Dunciad are to he
r, as Hercules to the author of that poem. Ignatius Sancho has approached 
nearer to merit in composition; yet his letters do more honour to the heart 
than the head. They breathe the purest effusions of friendship and general 
philanthropy, and show how great a degree of the latter may be compound
ed with strong religious zeal. He is often happy in the turn of his 
compliments, and his style is easy and familiar, except when he affects a 
Shandean fabrication of words. But his imagination is wild and extravagant, 
escapes incessantly from every restraint of reason and taste, and, in the cour
se of its vagaries, leaves a tract of thought as incoherent and eccentric, as 
is the course of a meteor through the sky. His subjects should often have led 
him to a process of sober reasoning: yet we find him always substituting 
sentiment for demonstration. Upon the whole, though we admit him to
 the first place among those of his own colour who have presented themselves to 
the public judgment, yet when we compare him with the writers of the race among 
whom he lived and particularly with the epistolary class, in which he has taken 
his own stand, we are compelled to enrol him at the bott
om of the column. This criticism supposes the letters published under his name 
to be genuine, and to have received amendment from no other hand; points which 
would not be of easy investigation. 

The improvement of the blacks in body and mind, in the first instance of their 
mixture with the whites, has been observed by every one, and proves that their 
inferiority is not the effect merely of their condition of life. We know that 
among the Romans, about the Augustan age especially, the con
dition of their slaves was much more deplorable than that of the blacks on the 
continent of America. The two sexes were confined in separate apartments, 
because to raise a child cost the master more than to buy one. Cato, for a very 
restricted indulgence to his slaves in this particular, took fr
om them a certain price. But in this country the slaves multiply as fast as the 
free inhabitants. Their situation and manners place the commerce between the 
two sexes almost without restraint. The same Cato, on a principle of oeconomy, 
always sold his sick and superannuated slaves. He gives it a
s a standing precept to a master visiting his farm, to sell his old oxen, old 
wagons, old tools, old and diseased servants, and every thing else become 
useless... 

The American slaves cannot enumerate this among the injuries and insults they 
receive. It was the common practice to expose in the island Esculapius, in the 
Tyber, diseased slaves, whose cure was like to become tedious. The emperor 
Claudius, by an edict, gave freedom to such of them as should re
cover, and first declared that if an person chose to kill rather than expose 
them, it should be deemed homicide. The exposing them is a crime of which no 
instance has existed with us; and were it to be followed by death, it would be 
punished capitally. We are told of a certain Vedius Pollio, who
, in the presence of Augustus, would have given a slave as food to his fish, 
for having broken a glass. With the Romans, the regular method of taking the 
evidence of their slaves was under torture. Here it has been thought better 
never to resort to their evidence. When a master was murdered, all
 his slaves, in the same house, or within hearing, were condemned to death. 
Here punishment falls on the guilty only, and as precise proof is required 
against him as against a freeman. 

Yet notwithstanding these and other discouraging circumstances among the 
Romans, their slaves were often their rarest artists. They excelled too in 
science, insomuch as to be usually employed as tutors to their masters' 
children. Epictetus, Terence, and Phaedrus, were slaves. But they were of th
e race of whites. It is not their condition then, but nature, which has 
produced the distinction. Whether further observation will or will not verify 
the conjecture, that nature has been less bountiful to them in the endowments 
of the head, I believe that in those of the heart she will be found 
to have done them justice. 

That disposition to theft with which they have been branded, must be ascribed 
to their situation, and not to any depravity of the moral sense. The man, in 
whose favour no laws of property exist, probably feels himself less bound to 
respect those made in favour of others. When arguing for ourselv
es, we lay it down as a fundamental, that laws, to be just, must give a 
reciprocation of right; that, without this, they are mere arbitrary rules of 
conduct, founded in force, and not in conscience: and it is a problem which I 
give to the master to solve, whether the religious precepts against t
he violation of property were not framed for him as well as his slave? And 
whether the slave may not as justifiably take a little from one, who has taken 
all from him, as he may slay one who would slay him? That a change in the 
relations in which a man is placed should change his ideas of moral 
right or wrong, is neither new, nor peculiar to the colour of the blacks. Homer 
tells us it was so 2600 years ago. 

Jove fix'd it certain, that whatever day
Makes man a slave, takes half his worth away. 

But the slaves of which Homer speaks were whites. Notwithstanding these 
considerations which must weaken their respect for the laws of property, we 
find among them numerous instances of the most rigid integrity, and as many as 
among their better instructed masters, of benevolence, gratitude and 
unshaken fidelity. 

The opinion, that they are inferior in the faculties of reason and imagination, 
must be hazarded with great diffidence. To justify a general conclusion, 
requires many observations, even where the subject may be submitted to the 
anatomical knife, to optical classes, to analysis by fire, or by sol
vents. How much more then where it is a faculty, not a substance, we are 
examining; where it eludes the research of all the Senses; where the conditions 
of its existence are various and variously combined; where the effects of those 
which are present or absent bid defiance to calculation; let me
 add too, as a circumstance of great tenderness, where our conclusion would 
degrade a whole race of men from the rank in the scale of beings which their 
Creator may perhaps have given them. 

To our reproach it must be said, that though for a century and a half we have 
had under our eyes the races of black and of red men, they have never yet been 
viewed by us as subjects of natural history. I advance it therefore as a 
suspicion only, that the blacks, whether originally a distinct rac
e, or made distinct by time and circumstances, are inferior to the whites in 
the endowments both of body and mind. It is not against experience to suppose, 
that different Species of the same genus, or varieties of the same species, may 
possess different qualifications. Will not a lover of natura
l history then, one who views the gradations in all the races of animals with 
the eye of philosophy, excuse an effort to keep those in the department of man 
as distinct as nature has formed them? 

This unfortunate difference of colour, and perhaps of faculty, is a powerful 
obstacle to the emancipation of these people. Many of their advocates, while 
they wish to vindicate the liberty of human nature are anxious also to preserve 
its dignity and beauty. Some of these, embarrassed by the ques
tion `What further is to be done with them?' join themselves in opposition with 
those who are actuated by sordid avarice only. Among the Romans emancipation 
required but one effort. The slave, when made free, might mix with, without 
staining the blood of his master. But with us a second is neces
sary, unknown to history. When freed, he is to be removed beyond the reach of 
mixture. 

The particular customs and manners that may happen to be received in that state?

It is difficult to determine on the standard by which the manners of a nation 
may be tried, whether catholic, or particular. It is more difficult for a 
native to bring to that standard the manners of his own nation, familiarized to 
him by habit. There must doubtless be an unhappy influence on th
e manners of our people produced by the existence of slavery among us. The 
whole commerce between master and slave is a perpetual exercise of the most 
boisterous passions, the most unremitting despotism on the one part, and 
degrading submissions on the other. 

Our children see this, and learn to imitate it; for man is an imitative animal. 
This quality is the germ of all education in him. From his cradle to his grave 
he is learning to do what he sees others do. If a parent could find no motive 
either in his philanthropy or his self love, for restrainin
g the intemperance of passion towards his slave, it should always be a 
sufficient one that his child is present. But generally it is not sufficient. 
The parent storms, the child looks on, catches the lineaments of wrath, puts on 
the same airs in the circle of smaller slaves, gives a loose to the
 worst of passions, and thus nursed, educated, and daily exercised in tyranny, 
cannot but be stamped by it with odious pecularities. The man must be a prodigy 
who can retain his manners and morals undepraved by such circumstances. And 
with what execration should the statesman be loaded, who, per
mitting one half the citizens thus to trarnple on the rights of the other, 
transforms those into despots, and these into enemies, destroys the morals of 
the one part, and the amor patriae of the other. 

For if a slave can have a country in this world, it must be any other in 
preference to that in which he is born to live and labour for another; in which 
he must lock up the faculties of his nature, contribute as far as depends on 
his individual endeavours to the evanishment of the human race, or
 entail his own miserable condition on the endless generations proceeding from 
him. With the morals of the people, their industry also is destroyed. For in a 
warm climate, no man will labour for himself who can make another labour for 
him. This is so true, that of the proprietors of slaves a ver
y small proportion indeed are ever seen to labour. 

And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their 
only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties 
are of the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath? 
Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is jus
t: that his justice cannot sleep for ever: that considering numbers, nature and 
natural means only, a revolution of the wheel of fortune, an exchange of 
situation is among possible events: that it may become probable by supernatural 
interference! The almighty has no attribute which can take side
 with us in such a contest. 

But it is impossible to be temperate and to pursue this subject through the 
various considerations of policy, of morals, of history natural and civil. We 
must be contented to hope they will force their way into every one's mind. I 
think a change already perceptible, since the origin of the prese
nt revolution. The spirit of the master is abating, that of the slave rising 
>from  the dust, his condition mollifying, the way I hope preparing, under the 
auspices of heaven, for a total emancipation, and that this is disposed, in the 
order of events, to be with the consent of the masters, rather
 than by their extirpation. 

FN1. (Jefferson's own note) The instrument proper to them is the Banjar, which 
they brought hither from Africa, and which is the original of the guitar, its 
chords being precisely the four lower chords of the guitar.

( To top of page )

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return to Politically Incorrect Home Page http://www.sound.net/~fenix

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Western Imperative Network (WIN)
http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm

National Alliance
http://www.natall.com







From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:17:17 EST 1998
Article: 64394 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 98 05:48:24 GMT
Subject: God and ARYAN man
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,soc.culture.usa,triangle.politics
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 48
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.54
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!WCG!news.randori.com!205.218.162.54
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64303 alt.discrimination:64394 soc.culture.usa:200262 triangle.politics:29307




  As the eye to the sun, so does man correspond to God. Since our
conscious mind does not comprehend the "absolute", it is ludicrous to
speak of such things in a patronizing or depreciatory manner. The divine
knowledge of God never relates to particular things, because it is
conversant with the highest, and therefore cannot be explained save when
it is extended to some truth less than God. Only then is God capable of
being described, but this general knowledge is ineffable. Principalities
and powers are always with us; we have no need to create them. It is
merely incumbent upon us to choose the high one who best represents our
folk, so that his service shall be our safeguard against being mastered
by the "other", whom we have not chosen. We do not CREATE God, we CHOSE
him in a comprehensible form to fit our personal needs and
understanding. The evolved and perfected folk archetype known as Wotan,
the Allfather of the Aryan race, has long been revered as the high god
of our ancient ancestors. Wotan is not necessarily identical with the
image we project of him in time and space. The archetype runs deep
within our genetic memory and goes on working as before, like an unknown
quantity in the depths of our psyche. The primordial names may change
through history, but the characteristic essence remains consistent
through today's existing Wotan archetype. It is only through the psyche
that we can establish that God acts upon us, but we are unable to
distinguish whether God and the unconscious are two different entities.

Both are border-line concepts for transcendental contents. Empirically
it can be established with a sufficient degree of probability that there
is in the unconscious an archetype of wholeness which manifests itself
spontaneously with a tendency independent of the conscious will. As
Wotan personifies the innermost divine essence of Aryan man. It should
be understood that Wotan is not THE all-knowing incomprehensible God
absolute. Everything that we have come to know about Wotan reveals that
he, likewise, is personally pursuing an upward path towards the
understanding of life's great universal mysteries and perfection,
sharing many of our own human characteristics. This again is the
essencial function of they sky-god archetype. It is of vital importance
that there always exists an interplay of the human nature in the divine
Gods and a divine nature that exists in the human make-up of man.

WOTANSVOLK
http://www.nidlink.com/~fourteenwords/wvolk.htm

Western Imperative Network (WIN)
http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm

National Alliance
http://www.natall.com



From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:17:17 EST 1998
Article: 64410 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 98 13:37:16 GMT
Subject: Louis Farrakhan: Black Hero
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.nationalism.black,alt.politics.usa.republican,soc.culture.usa,triangle.politics
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 380
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.54
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!fu-berlin.de!newspeer.monmouth.com!darla.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!WCG!news.randori.com!205.218.162.54
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64351 alt.discrimination:64410 alt.politics.nationalism.black:10807 alt.politics.usa.republican:478262 soc.culture.usa:200325 triangle.politics:29315



Interview with the Arizona Republic:

WHO IS FARRAKHAN? 
PART I


------------------------------------------------------------------------
On March 25, 1996, the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan was interviewed by
editors and reporters at the Arizona Republic Newspaper in Phoenix. 
------------------------------------------------------------------------


MINISTER LOUIS FARRAKHAN: As a person who is a part time resident in Phoenix, 
it is an honor for me to sit with you. One of the things that I think is 
somewhat disturbing to me is that a person can grow up in America, grow up in 
the Black community, work in the Black community for nearly 40 year
s, and now has come to national and international attention, and whites, in 
particular, do not have what I think is a good knowledge of the person. 

It seems to me that the white community has always wanted to know those persons 
who become spokespersons for the oppressed. I believe that there is a 
tremendous lack of knowledge of Louis Farrakhan. So, I'm here this morning 
hoping to give information about myself, about what I believe, about wh
ere we want to go, about the World Friendship Tour, about the things that you 
may be interested in asking of me. I would hope that it would lead to the 
American public being much more aware of Louis Farrakhan than the 30 second 
(sound) bites on television, or the information that you may receive
 from those whose view of me is far from what I believe I really am. 

With that in mind, I would hope that since I've come to submit myself to you 
for questioning that you'll feel free to ask of me anything that you desire to 
know with respect to the Nation of Islam, the religion of Islam, the aim of 
Islam or anything that you have heard concerning the tour. I wou
ld be most happy to try to answer them for you. Thank you, very much. 

ARIZONA REPUBLIC (AR): What do you think is the white public's perception of 
you, and what would like it to be? 

MINISTER LOUIS FARRAKHAN (MLF): I think since I have never spoken primarily to 
white audiences--all of my audiences for the past 40 years have been mainly 
Black, not even Hispanic, or Asian or Arab. Black people, more than likely, 
have a fairly good understanding of Louis Farrakhan on the mass l
evel as was seen with the Million Man March. The call that was made by Louis 
Farrakhan was answered by over a million persons, and these persons have some 
knowledge or understanding of Louis Farrakhan.

Unfortunately, during the Jesse Jackson campaign ...I came to national public 
attention as a person who is (mislabeled) "anti-Semitic," as a person who is 
"racist," as a person who is "anti-white," etc. So, most white persons who came 
to know me, believe me to be anti-Semitic, anti-white, anti-A
merican, anti-Christian.

The perception that I would prefer is: what is the truth? Perception is not 
necessarily truth. Whatever I really am is what I would like to be know as. 
That means that you can't just look at Louis Farrakhan and pigeon-hole me by a 
word-- 'bigot," "anti-Semite," "hater," "anti-white". There's got
 to be something more to a person than these little words would tend to 
describe. I would hope that through persons like yourself, that know how to dig 
behind masks, that you will find the real Louis Farrakhan, whatever that is 
>from  your perception. Then, that's what I hope to be perceived as, w
ho and what I really, really am. 

AR: Will you reach out to these other communities? 

MLF: Yes, I not only intend to do this, but I intend to speak in the Hispanic 
community, in the Arab community, and in the white community. I would welcome a 
chance to speak at a Jewish synagogue, because I feel that the Jews need to 
know me, and know me more than what they've been made to perce
ive of me. Whites need to know me better. I will frankly say, that I've had 
several meetings with Jewish rabbis. In the dialogue, I learned the sensitivity 
of Jews, in particular, and whites, in general, to certain words and phrases 
that we would speak commonly in the Black community without off
ense. 

Sometimes when you speak only to your own people there are words that you would 
speak in an Irish context as an Irish person that, even if it were negative, an 
Irish person might not feel bad because you are speaking and you are Irish. But 
if someone out of that context spoke as you spoke to you
r people it might create offense. By talking to people outside of your own 
group, you begin to learn their sensitivities. This one of the reasons why I 
wish to speak to more than just my own people, but I want to speak to that 
which makes up America so that I can learn the sensitivities of other
 cultures and ethnic groups that my words might not be as offensive as they are 
not found, necessarily, to be offensive in the Black community. 

AR: If you could speak to a Jewish synagogue right now, what would your message 
be? 

MLF: As I spoke to these rabbis, one of them asked me would I be willing to 
speak before the Board of Rabbis. I said, yes, I would be glad to do that 
tomorrow, if you could arrange it. And the other rabbi that was present asked, 
would you come to a Jewish synagogue? I said tonight if you could a
rrange it. I believe that if I stood before the Jewish people and spoke to them 
honestly from what I feel and believe, that whether they agreed with me or not, 
at least they would get to know me better. It disturbs me that members of the 
Jewish community may feel or believe that I'm another Hitl
er, and that if I ever get mass following that I would do to them that which 
Hitler and others have done to them. That is disturbing to me, because no such 
thought has ever been in my mind and is not in my mind now, and I don't think 
it will ever be in my mind. So, I would be to them as I hope t
o be to you this morning, very open, very frank. I think that when you're 
candid and frank, whether they agree with you or not, they get to know you 
better. And then they can form a better opinion of you. I would probably just 
present myself to them, and speak to them from my heart and see what 
my reaction would be. 

AR: You said you were reaching out to other communities. Are you also getting 
more involved here in Phoenix? I noticed that ASU (Arizona State University) 
and the Nation of Islam were involved I a controversy there over racial 
tensions. They had an event there Thursday. Saturday, the Nation of I
slam's young group, one of the drill teams, was involved in an event they had 
here at ASU, for hundreds, maybe a thousand Black young people across the 
state. Is that something the Nation of Islam is consciously trying to do? 

MLF: Well, we are a part of the community. We have been separate and we want 
people to know us better. We come from the community, and our desire is to 
serve the community, and our desire is to serve the community. The only way we 
can serve the community is that the community knows us, we know t
he community, know its needs and then work to fulfill the desires of our 
community in harmony and in coalition with other groups who are working for the 
same cause. We are not against building coalitions past racial lines or 
identification. We know that if our people are going to be successful i
n America, we can't do it all by ourselves. There has to be the help of others 
to help us to help ourselves. We're not against coalitions; what we are for is 
coalitions on the basis of strength, not weak coalitions where we come to the 
table bringing nothing, and then having to accept other pers
on's guidance, instructions, and philanthropy. We want to be able to come to 
the table as an equal and then think about forming these coalitions for the 
good, not only of our community, but the total community at large. 

Most of our coalitions, unfortunately from my vantage point, are usually from a 
position of weakness. When we sit at tables with our white counterparts, we 
come with ideas but not money. So other people finance our marches, finance our 
things, and when people finance you they're the ones paying 
the piper so they usually feel justified in calling the tune. We don't feel 
that as a people we can make progress with these kinds of coalitions where it 
serves the best interest of others who we are coalescing with, but not our best 
interests. 

By coming to a table from a position of strength, strength means that a s 
community we know what is our self-interest, we know what is our best interest. 
We are unified in the pursuit of what is in our best interest and then we come 
to the table with Hispanics, with Whites, with Arabs, with Asia
ns, but we bring something to that table with something more than just a 
request or a demand. 

All of us are in this ship called America. America is in deep, deep, deep 
trouble. If she goes down, all of us are going to be hurt whether we feel that 
we're an oppressed community or not-oppressed, so we have a stake here. So, 
it's going to take coalitions, but coalitions that are based on equ
ity, fairness, justice, and certainly bringing something to the table more than 
a demand. 

AR: That last statement about America being in deep, deep, deep trouble--what 
would you characterize as the single most, in your eyes, the single most vital 
issue that in a perfect world that this country won't address. 

MLF: That last phrase, "in a perfect world" ...as I see America, there is no 
nation on Earth her equal. She is a superpower with great strength 
economically, politically, and militarily. But from my vantage point, she's not 
a superpower morally. It is the righteousness of a nation that sustains 
it. If America now as the only superpower in the world is motivated, her 
self-interests, her international interests are motivated by four hundred or 
more corporate entities that determine America's domestic and mainly foreign 
policies, and they are driven by greed, which is not a good moral cha
racter: if policy is formed to help America interact with nations in the world, 
but there is a greed in this policy, and then that greed is coupled with power, 
with wealth, with military might, and the poison of racism, then is sets this 
country up to be like the great empires of the past with w
hom God became angry and moved in His own way to bring those civilizations to 
naught. 

I see this nation going in that direction, and I hope to be a voice crying in 
the wilderness to Jews, to Gentiles, to Blacks, and Whites, and especially to 
government. We're on a wrong course and if you don't change the course that 
we're on, there are very serious consequences to this present co
urse. The greatest single thing that I would hope to see in America is that 
religious leaders would begin to teach and stress the moral values that make a 
nation perpetually great, and stop compromising that of His prophets by what 
we'd call modernism, or humanism, that makes us compromise the v
ery values that make the nation great. 

AR: What are those values, the core values, what would make a nation great? 
Would you list them? 

MLF: Yes. In my judgment, the belief in God, by whatever name you choose to 
call Him. A belief in God's Sovereignty over our lives. And since God is the 
Giver of life, He's the Best One to direct how we should live our lives, and 
>from  that flows our system of justice, our system of social values
, our economic values, our family values. It all flows from our belief in God 
and our willingness to carry our His Will our lives. 

In the beginning, America started off with a belief in a Higher Power, but we 
as Blacks were not necessarily included in what flows from belief in terms of 
the treatment of fellow human beings. So, here you have America at the pinnacle 
of her greatness, confronted with a problem that started fro
m the institution of slavery and the founding fathers setting up a magnificent 
document that did not have us, the Blacks, in mind. Now Americans who have to 
decide whether the view of the founding fathers was somewhat narrow. If you 
want this land to be multiracial, multi-cultural, then the visi
on of the rulers has to expand to include those persons. 

You are faced now with the terrible Black and White problem. You are faced with 
a rich and poor problem. You are faced with a rich and poor problem. You are 
faced with an economic problem--that little talk that's going in the Congress 
about arguing over whether they're going to balance the budge
t in seven years or five years. These re serious problems, but they flow our of 
a basic immorality. I'll close this by saying that each of us has 
responsibility for the moral condition of this nation, and to see cultural 
degeneracy displayed day in, day out, on radio, television, newspapers, mag
azines, the lowest, the base instincts of the human being is pandered to and 
the masses of the people are ignorant, in a democracy. 

These are serious problems, as I see it, that demand all of us looking at it 
intelligently, and coming up with solutions that can save America from herself. 
There's no power outside of America that can destroy, even as we speak, by an 
internal rot that is not being properly addressed necessarily
 by the spiritual leaders, by the political leaders. The economic leaders, who 
have benefited so much from this country, have no sense of patriotism. 
Patriotism is not a part of corporate America's modus operandi. When you think 
more of a dollar and how you can make your bottom line fatter at th
e expense of the very nation that gave you c chance to become rich and 
powerful, then we have some serious, serious problems that have to be 
addressed. 

The politicians, in my judgment, are not forthright enough. They want to talk 
about hopes and dreams of a good future, but they don't have the moral strength 
or courage right now to deal with the serious problems that this country faces. 
They've done a lot of comparing me with Pat Buchanan. Pat 
Buchanan is a very honest person. Whether you agree with Pat Buchanan is a very 
honest person. Whether you agree with Pat Buchanan or not, there's fire in that 
man's belly for what he believes. He speaks with passion because he's concerned 
about the future of this country. Whether you agree with
 him or not--that's entirely the people's choice--we need more people speaking 
forthrightly for the things and against those things that are absolutely 
destroying this nation. 

AR: Do you hope to become a factor in the elections this year, to use the power 
you have, the influence you have? 

MLF: I would like to be able to help as many Blacks, Hispanics, Arab-Americans, 
Asian-Americans, and White Americans, who have dropped out of the process or 
have not become involved in the political process, to get involved. I would 
like to see these votes leveraged, particularly since most Blac
k people are Democrats, but yet are not getting from the Democratic Party what 
Blacks have given to that party. We have put our hopes and trusts in 
individuals, rather than in an agenda that is in the best interest of our 
people. If we, meaning the Nation of Islam and those who were responsible 
for the success of the Million Man March, could marshal those votes and 
mobilize those votes and develop an agenda that is good for the weak and the 
poor and the vulnerable in this society, then we could ask both parties to 
address these concerns. The one addressing our concerns best would get o
ur vote. I would hope, not as a politician, to influence that direction, by the 
help of God. 

AR: Is there a candidate right now who appeals to you? 

MLF: No. Not at all. Mr. Clinton, according to what I read this morning in the 
paper, has great support in the Black community. But Mr. Clinton went further 
in dismantling affirmative action than the Supreme Court did. President Clinton 
spoke well on affirmative action but did the very opposite 
of what he said. Our people are very loyal, they're democrats, but what we 
would hope is to make Mr. Clinton more responsive to the needs of the Black, 
Hispanic, Asian, and Arab constituency. We can't do that by letting this man 
get off the hook with wonderful sounding speeches. We have to prese
nt him with an agenda, programmatic things, and get him to sign off on that 
which we feel is not only in the best interest of Black people--because it goes 
beyond us--but what is in the best interests of the masses of the American 
people--Black, Hispanic, Asian, Arab, and poor Whites. 

If these concerns are not met properly, the thing that we saw in April of last 
year--bombing of the Federal Building in Oklahoma, the rise of a militia that 
feels that the country is going wrong and that nobody has to get it right--this 
spirit is growing in America. While the politicians are pla
ying silly, little childish games, the American people are suffering and 
becoming more and more disillusioned with politicians, with the process. When 
that happens, you're facing possible anarchy and revolution. 

We can't sit and say that that can't happen in America, when you see the great 
Russia, which was an empire, and all of a sudden in the twinkling of an eye 
it's done. The Shah of Iran sitting there with the powerful backing of America, 
and in the next day or two it's gone. President Ceausecu in R
omania, so solid on the throne, and in a few minutes he's gone. What is this 
says is if our own intelligence-gathering institution could not see this and 
even prepare adequately for it, then it says we are like the ostrich with our 
head in the sand. Whatever we're doing with our head in the sand
, some part of us is greatly exposed, so it would seem to me that we'd better 
start locking out for the masses of the American people, and bringing some sort 
of satisfaction to their dissatisfaction, otherwise, in the next four years 
there is great trouble on the horizon, in my humble judgment, 
for this country and for the world. 

AR: What about other Black leaders such as Jesse Jackson, Benjamin Chavis, and 
others? Do you feel that they're doing an adequate job or could they be doing 
more? 

MLF: We could do a much better job together that we do apart. The Rev. Jackson 
has tremendous skill and brilliance, both spiritually and politically. He's a 
major player, not only in Black affairs, but the Rev. Jackson can be a major 
player in the affairs of America. Kwesi Mfume, who has accepte
d the mantle of leadership of the NAACP and that organization, as well as Hugh 
Price (of the Urban League), as well as the Nation of Islam. All of us are 
valuable, but none of us individually can do what needs to be done. But this 
collective strategy of coming together and forming a consensus to
 in that direction, I think that would be in the best interest not only of 
Black people, but of America. 

I will close that question with the point made by Martin King... that the 
oppressed, with all of our hurt and our pain, we became the moral conscience of 
a nation. Since there is not superpower on earth that can challenge 
America--we've always had this balance of power thing, Russia in the east 
and America in the west and the poor nations could opt to either play like 
they're going to communist to extract something from America or extract 
something from the Soviet Union. Well, now that the Soviet Union is gone, and 
England is not as powerful as she once was, nor France, so they have th
e EC, the European Community, coming together. But, they don't come together to 
challenge America, to make America more moral and more just. 

Here is the unique contribution that Blacks can make to the survival of this 
nation. I feel that it is my duty to call Black people, in particular, and the 
oppressed, in general, to the task, to the mission of challenging America. Not 
with guns, because I really don't think that is necessary. No
t with terrorist activity that takes the innocent lives of human beings, but 
challenging America with the force of our unity and the power of our logic. 

I believe that once the American people really know, they will act 
appropriately. And to me, that's the responsibility of the news media. For the 
news media not to be free, is not in the best interest of the American people. 
The media must be free in order to keep America free and strong. I read
 an article in the paper recently that media people should not be used as 
spies. "Should not be," but some are. Some media folk are planted there by CIA, 
by FBI, to plant stories and this has been going on for years. It does not help 
America in the long run. 

Now, I am a voice that you may not like, and that's alright with me. I'm not 
here to win popularity contests. But, if you report me accurately, that's all I 
ask. I don't ask you to give me some roses. What I do ask is that you do your 
research, question me as hard as you wish to, but then quote 
me accurately. Then, the American people are not deceived by false words 
because people fear me. And if you have any fears, I would like to dispel them. 

At the Million Man March, which was a great triumph of will, a great triumph of 
character, we put that Million Man March on a Monday. Everyone told us you 
can't do it on a Monday. You must do it on a weekend. I said, no, it must be on 
a Monday, when government is in session, when school is in se
ssion, when people have to go to work, because I want to see if they will make 
a sacrifice; and they did. 

Here was a mass of human beings that responded to a call. At the height of this 
"manifestation of influence and power," go back and listen to my speech, I 
never threatened America, I never said "well, we're going to do this." That was 
an army of Black men standing in front of me. You can say the
y liked the message, but they didn't like the Messenger. You can tickle 
yourself with that, if you wish to. They loved the message AND they loved the 
Messenger. Don't' you fool yourself or be fooled by those who manipulate your 
fears. I wanted to demonstrate to America that that's not my aim at 
all. 

My aim is to do good for our people. Since this is the only country I know, and 
though I have love for Africa, great love for Africa, this is home to me. I 
would like to see America get it right. I would like to play a part in helping 
her to get right. Since all of us are only here for a short t
ime, we have to ask what are we going to pass on to our children, and our 
grandchildren. Is this the America that we wish to pass on? I don't think so. 
That puts on all of us to do something better than what we are doing and have 
done. I hope I'm not talking too long on simple questions. 
------------------------------------------------------------------------




©1996 FCN Publishing
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
External Links are not necessarily endorsed by FCN Publishing







From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:17:17 EST 1998
Article: 64416 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 98 14:31:18 GMT
Subject: JEWS Fought for Hitler !!
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.usa.republican,soc.culture.israel,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.usa,triangle.politics
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 250
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.54
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!fu-berlin.de!howland.erols.net!ais.net!uunet!in4.uu.net!news.randori.com!205.218.162.54
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64356 alt.discrimination:64416 alt.politics.usa.republican:478269 soc.culture.israel:122761 soc.culture.palestine:41421 soc.culture.usa:200329 triangle.politics:29317


Jews are wrestling with another of their own Big Lies. 
As time passes more and more "discoveries" are made about what really happened 
in WWII. In the Tugent article, an independent researcher finds Germans with 
Jewish ancestry who fought on the German side of the war. Both articles, which 
still maintain the myth of "extermination" camps, ignores the
 contradictions inherent in the story itself. Actually, the National Socialist 
racial policy extended German citizenship to anyone who was half German, 
including half-Jewish. The "revelation" only appears amazing to those spoon-fed 
50 plus years of anti-German propaganda. Soon someone will "disc
over" that 300,000 Jews lived in Germany in 1939 and that 300,000 Jews lived in 
Germany in 1945. Then they'll ask: "How can that be, weren't they all gassed?" 
Ed.

------------------------------------------------------------------------




GRAD STUDENT UNCOVERS JEWS WHO FOUGHT FOR HITLER
By Tom Tugend 
Jewish Telegraph Agency (JTA)


LOS ANGELES, Dec. 26 (JTA) -- Thousands of soldiers and officers of Jewish 
descent fought in Hitler's armies, with his full approval, while their 
relatives were transported to extermination camps.

In one instance, Hitler personally suspended his Nuremberg racial laws to 
designate a list of 77 high-ranking Wehrmacht officers of "mixed Jewish race or 
married to a Jew'' as pure, German-blooded Aryans. The list included 15 
generals. These incredible tales were unearthed by Bryan Rigg, a 25-ye
ar-old Yale University graduate. Rigg has spent four years scouring German army 
records and interviewing more than 300 Jewish or partly Jewish people who 
fought under the swastika in World War II. 

The Texas-born Rigg is now a graduate history student at Cambridge University 
in England, where he was interviewed by the London correspondent of the Los 
Angeles Times. His research has impressed historians. 

Jonathan Steinberg, a professor at Cambridge, said, "When I saw Bryan's 
archive, I couldn't believe it. He's like the sorcerer's apprentice, calling 
these sources up from the depths.'' 

Rigg said he had documented the Jewish ancestry of 1,200 of Hitler's soldiers, 
among them two field marshals. Twenty of these men were awarded the Knight's 
Cross, Germany's highest military decoration. One of the field marshals was 
Erhard Milch, deputy to Luftwaffe Chief and Gestapo founder Herm
ann Goering. Rumors of Milch's Jewishness -- his father was Jewish -- 
circulated widely in Germany in the 1930s. 

In one of the famous anecdotes of the time, Goering falsified Milch's birth 
record and then said, "I decide who is a Jew and who is an Aryan.'' 

>From  his interviews, Rigg culled stories that defy belief. One was about a 
German officer, in full uniform, who visited the Sachsenhausen concentration 
camp in 1942 to see his Jewish father, one of the inmates. Another story was 
about a Knight's Cross holder who, as a prisoner of war in England,
 was reunited with his Jewish father, who had earlier fled Germany. 

Many of the veterans Rigg met indicated that they had hoped through their 
military service to save the lives of relatives classified as Jews. But in 
analyzing one group of 1,000 such soldiers, Rigg found that nearly 2,300 of 
their relatives were killed in the Holocaust. 

Rigg's research also shed light on stories surrounding the rescue by German 
soldiers of the Lubavitcher rebbe of that time, who was trapped in Warsaw when 
war broke out in 1939. Joseph Isaac Schneerson was spirited to safety after an 
appeal to Germany from the then-neutral United States. Traditi
on has it that Schneerson was rescued by a German Jew. Rigg has identified the 
man as a highly decorated professional soldier, Maj. Ernst Bloch, whose father 
was a Jew. 

Rigg started his quest at Yale while digging into his own family's German 
roots. His first discovery was that his great- grandparents, who arrived in the 
United States as Protestants, had been born in Germany as Jews. Next, he 
happened to see the film "Europa, Europa,'' the true story of a Jewis
h teen-ager who saved his life by posing as an ethnic German and serving in the 
Nazi army. Afterward, Rigg struck up a chance conversation with an elderly 
German Jew, who spoke about his own service in the Wehrmacht, and Rigg was 
hooked. 

With hardly any financial resources, Rigg conducted his interviews by 
crisscrossing Germany, often by bicycle, carrying his clothes, computer and 
documents in a bulging knapsack. He has 400 more interviews to go on his 
current check list. "The thing is, I don't give up,'' Rigg told the Los Angel
es Times. ``If I have to carry 60 pounds on my back, I do it. If I have to 
sleep in train stations, I do it. I do it to get to these people.'' 

The initial reports on Rigg's findings in the British media have provoked 
debates among historians. Most agree that while the fact that Jews served in 
the Wehrmacht has been known for some time, the story has never before been 
documented in such intimate detail. 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
( Return to top of page ) 





HITLER'S MARTIAL JEWS
By Bernard Levin
Copyright 1996 Times Newspapers Limited


(December 6, 1996, Friday) Jewish and part-Jewish soldiers fought for the Third 
Reich. What did they think they were doing? We shall never know.

When will the Holocaust be the Holocaust, in all its terrible meaning and no 
more? When will professors stop finding a new "angle" on something that can 
never have an angle? When will the dreadful fools and madmen who prove that 
there was no Holocaust (I have just got another pamphlet saying as 
much), stop hating and even stop being mad?

Never, I fear, but I have long ago given up trying to convince fools and 
professors that my nose is of standard British length and width and no more. 
Wearily, I shrug, and say, yes, I am a Jew, and no, no member of my family died 
in the Holocaust. And, just to clinch it, no - my name has always 
been Levin, and never Featherstonhaugh-Golightly. 

Now then. What would you say if Adolf Hitler were on his throne and the 
Holocaust was in full blast, but German Jews were not only serving in Hitler's 
ranks, but personally enlisting in those ranks. Not just to find a place that 
the Nazis might not spot, but with full intent to take part in the 
war on Hitler's side? It sounds lunatic, and in a sense it was. But read this:

It seems that those Jewish Germans who enlisted voluntarily and made efforts to 
remain in uniform even after their Jewish origins came under scrutiny by the 
authorities were allowed to do so. Indeed, some rose to high rank and several 
won the Ritterkreuz , the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross, G
ermany's highest military decoration, awarded to fighter aces, U-boat captains 
and tank destroyers. They performed their feats of bravery at the height of the 
war, when the Nazi state was murdering German Jews in hundreds of thousands and 
the Jews of Eastern Europe in millions.

Only they can explain why they chose the path they did, and all are now old or 
already dead.

These almost unbelievable facts were dug up by a young American student, Bryan 
Rigg, who, in a chance meeting, was to reveal some of the most extraordinary 
true stories of the Second World War. Rigg did not even know, before he began 
his studies in this fascinating story, that he was of German-J
ewish ancestry, but believed his family was of the Protestant Bible-belt, and 
among his amazements were the members of his family who had stayed in Germany 
and died in the Holocaust.

And now, with this extraordinary story at our elbows, we are tempted to believe 
that the whole thing is, and must be, a hoax. But it isn't. It is not only 
true, from top to bottom, it is terrible. Terrible, you say? Just glance at one 
headline (the story broke in The Daily Telegraph ), reading "
Why men of Jewish blood shed it for Adolf Hitler". Answer that.

I can't. Nor can anybody else. I am a Jew, and thus to be hated by Nazis; very 
well, I understand that, and shrug. But Mr Rigg has not just found a cache of 
almost unbelievable matter about Hitler's Reich and its evil madness, he has 
pointed a dagger at some of the newly known facts of the Holoc
aust, and - well, let me say it again: "Why men of Jewish blood shed it for 
Adolf Hitler". For they did, they did, they did.

Have you ever heard of Major Robert Bor chardt? No? Nor had I until very 
recently. He was a half-Jew, and a very brave man, and a very great fighter on 
Hitler's side. He did not commit atrocities, nor did he allow them in his 
units. He fought in Russia, in Rommel's Afrika Korps, and he was strew
n with medals. Not long before he died, he spoke to the children of his old 
school, and this is what he said: "Many German Jews and half-Jews who fought in 
the First World War and even in the Second World War believed that they should 
honour their Fatherland by serving in the military." And many
 of them did.

But what I want to know, and I imagine many others want to know, is what did 
Jews think they were doing when they were fighting for Hitler? Take the 
remarkable story - a perfectly true story - of the way Rabbi Schneerson was 
saved from the Nazis. The rabbi was the leader of the most ultra-orthod
ox Jews, and when the war broke he was trapped, and very likely to be killed by 
Hitler. There was a plea from the United States to let the Rabbi Schneerson go. 
It was touch and go; but then another German Jew, fighting in the war on the 
side of Hitler, took a hand: he was a very high officer, Er
nst Bloch, who had fought in the First World War, and Schneerson was saved.

And saved in the most macabre manner imaginable. Admiral Canaris recruited 
Bloch, and then Hitler made the world go round the other way; with a half-Jew 
staring him in his face, Hitler read the appropriate document: "I, Adolf 
Hitler, leader of the German nation, approve Major Ernst Bloch to be o
f German blood. However, after the war, Ernst Bloch will be re-evaluated to see 
if he is still worthy to have such a title." (Who said Hitler was sane?)

But still the question must be asked and answered, why men of Jewish blood shed 
it for Adolf Hitler.

Most of those men are now dead, and the dead cannot speak. If they could speak, 
what might they say? There would be many who would say "I didn't know - how 
could I know? The whole world was there, and nobody knew - nobody knew what 
that man called Hitler would do to the world and millions upon m
illions."

Not enough. Not enough. You, the ones who were there, could see. Oh no, very 
few indeed could have guessed the whole of the madness (though even that could 
have been spotted and was by the tiny number who could read Mein Kampf from 
beginning to end), but that was not enough.

Very well, not enough. What next? We must try to think into the minds of the 
survivors, and what they did and what lies they told. There is a very old man, 
82 and failing, who has asked for anonymity; he shall have it. But he says that 
he served 6 1/2 years in Hitler's military, and became a cap
tain. Presumably he drew the curtains when a Nazi went by. That's small fry. 
What about a real field marshal, a good friend of Goering and indeed a very 
important figure in the Nazi camp, for it was he who made the Luftwaffe the 
tremendous thing it became. That was Field Marshal Milch, and he wa
s a Jew. But a field marshal, surely, should know better. And so should a Jew.

Surely should? Did. Did. We come back to where we started. But not quite. For 
we now know the massive quantities of horror that poured out of Bryan Rigg's 
find. (It was luck, of a kind: he had just come out of a cinema and started to 
chat to another cinema-goer, a German, whereupon they began to
 speak, and the other man spoke of his life, whereupon "they talked until 
dawn". I bet they did.)

We come back to where we started yet again. What were real Jews or even 
half-Jews (and there were many of these) doing with Adolf Hitler? True, there 
were people who saw through Hitler very quickly, but were sure that he would be 
a busted flush in no time. Well, he wasn't, and in the end the blo
od poured copiously. And there was no shortage of important people; Helmut 
Schmidt, who became the Chancellor of West Germany for eight years, had when 
somewhat younger been very much in the wrong place.

This is yet another question that cannot be answered unless the dead rise from 
the grave to give the answers. It would be dreadful to say that the dead 
deserved what they got, because they didn't. Again, we hear the terrible words 
- how could we have known?

Perhaps the most pitiful or most deserved - you can take it either way - is 
that of Milch, the one who was "a personal friend of Hermann Goering." And 
instantly the thunder rolls; how does a Jew become a personal friend of Hermann 
Goering, and more to the point, why is he prepared to be one in t
he first place?

Milch was tried and convicted in the Nuremberg war trials; his Jewishness did 
not help him, and he was imprisoned for ten years. But again and again, we ask 
the question, the question that cannot be answered. What was a Jew, or a 
half-Jew, doing with Adolf Hitler? God forbid that I should take s
ides in such a dreadful argument. It is enough that almost all the people 
concerned are now dead. But if they came to life, would they not instantly go 
back into the shades?
-=-=-=-==-
Western Imperative Network (WIN)
http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm

National Alliance 
http://www.natall.com



From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:17:17 EST 1998
Article: 64418 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 98 14:41:53 GMT
Subject: Re: "Honest" Abraham Lincoln on Negroes
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.nationalism.black,alt.politics.usa,soc.culture.african.american,soc.culture.usa,triangle.politics
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
References: 
 <34e6fa31.268928345@news.univie.ac.at>
Lines: 40
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.54
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!fu-berlin.de!peerfeed.ncal.verio.net!WCG!news.randori.com!205.218.162.54
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64357 alt.discrimination:64418 alt.politics.nationalism.black:10809 alt.politics.usa.misc:160104 soc.culture.african.american:229419 soc.culture.usa:200332 triangle.politics:29318

On 2/15/98 8:25AM, in message <34e6fa31.268928345@news.univie.ac.at>, DI Thomas 
Mohr  wrote:

> lambert@morgan.net wrote:
> 
> >"What I would most desire would be the separation of the white and black 
> >races." (Spoken at Springfield, Illinois on July 17th, 1858; from Abraham 
> >Lincoln: Complete Works, 1894, Vol. 1, page 273).
> < snip >
> 
> What do you want to prove with that ? My God, don't you realize that
> this was more than 100 years ago ? Do you know how you seem to me ?
> Like a German saying that there can never be peace with France because
> they took away the Elsass in 1918. Or like a Frenchman saying there
> never can be peace with Germany because the Germans crowned their
> emperor in Versailles in 1870. My God, are you really so pathetic ?
> 
> We write 1998 and not 1865 !
> 

The header to your post claims you are not from the United States? If
this is true, America is "politically correct" and much of our history
is re-written as if it were to offend someone. I am a history major and
I feel the truth needs to be told!

Hail Bismarck! Heil Luther! Heil Frederick the Great!




> >-=-=-=-=-
> >Western Imperative Network (WIN)
> >http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm
> >
> >National Alliance
> >http://www.natall.com
> >
> >
> 




From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:17:18 EST 1998
Article: 64425 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 98 14:24:11 GMT
Subject: Non-White Immigration= Death Sentence
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.usa.republican
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 314
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.54
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!Supernews73!Supernews60!supernews.com!uunet!in4.uu.net!news.randori.com!205.218.162.54
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64360 alt.discrimination:64425 alt.politics.usa.republican:478317

Non-White Immigration: Death Sentence for America


by Dr. William L. Pierce 
Chairman, National Alliance 


(1/10/97) TODAY WE'LL TAKE A LOOK into the future -- a look into what the 
future will be like if we all remain spectators and simply let the present 
course of events continue. 

And we'll also look at what the future could be if we choose to become 
participants in the historical process instead of merely remaining spectators. 

I will tailor these two visions of the future especially for those of us who 
live in North America -- but in broad outline they will be recognizable by all 
of us, no matter what part of the White world we live in. 

First, let's look at the future we will have if we continue behaving just as we 
are now: if we continue watching TV, paying our taxes, and letting the 
politicians and the controlled media run the country. 

Consider demographics, for example: the relative numbers of the different types 
of people in America. During the 50 years since the Second World War, America 
has been darkening, has been getting less and less White. Immigration from 
Europe was cut off after the war -- except for Jews, of course 
-- and the floodgates from the non-White world were opened. Asians and mestizos 
have been pouring into the country, both legally and illegally. 

Most of these non-White races breed much faster than Whites do. The result has 
been a steady rise in the percentage of non-White minorities in America. If you 
live on a farm in Kansas or the Dakotas you may not have noticed the change. If 
you live in Florida or California or New York, however, y
ou certainly have noticed it. In fact, most of our people who live in America's 
larger cities have had their faces rubbed in it. 

If things continue as they are going now, there is no chance at all that this 
situation will become better. Non-White immigrants will continue pouring into 
America, because no matter how bad things get here, conditions will be even 
worse where these immigrants came from. The government will not 
even try to halt the illegal part of this non-White flood, because the 
government doesn't really want it halted. And the non-Whites already here will 
continue to have more children than the Whites. At some time in the next 
century Whites will become a minority in North America. And the flood wil
l continue. 

And the television propaganda telling us that the flood of non-Whites really is 
a good thing will continue too. The politicians will continue to sing the 
praises of "diversity" and "multiculturalism," in tune with the television. We 
will be told that if we object to the flood we are "haters" and
 "racists." Interracial sex will continue to be presented as fashionable by the 
media. And what was a White country 50 years ago will gradually become a Brown 
country. 

Of course, even a hundred years from now there may be a few super-richWhite 
families who will be able to keep their heads above the flood on their own 
private islands, with their private security forces, but for the rest of us 
there will be no White schools, no White neighborhoods, no White club
s or bars or restaurants. We will be submerged: that is, our grandchildren will 
be submerged. That's the way it has been planned, and that is the way it will 
happen -- not may happen, but will happen -- if we don't interfere: if we just 
keep watching TV, paying our taxes, and voting for the Demo
crats or the Republicans. 

Right now I can almost hear the hoots and groans from a million or so 
Politically Correct idiots. "What difference does it make whether America is 
White or Brown?" they are saying. "What difference does it make what color our 
grandchildren are? Color is only skin deep. After all, we're all the s
ame; we're all equal." Or, if they're onto the very latest Politically Correct 
fad, they are saying, "There really is no such thing as race. Scientists have 
proved that race is just an illusion created by racists to keep us all apart." 

Really, there is no fad too foolish or too perverse, no opinion too contrary to 
the facts, for these Politically Correct lemmings to adopt, once it has been 
declared fashionable by the controlled media. But certainly the lemmings will 
have their way -- if the rest of us do nothing. 

Or consider crime. The lemmings would have us believe that crime is the result 
of "oppression" and "injustice" by heterosexual White males, and that it will 
disappear as soon as we have a society where no one is "discriminated against" 
and where all of the officially favored minorities are given
 everything they want. I don't think that even the lemmings really believe 
that, but that's what the television has taught them to say, and so that's what 
they say. 

You and I, on the other hand, understand that as we have given the minorities 
more and more handouts, as we have given them every sort of advantage over 
ourselves -- all sorts of affirmative action preferences in admissions to 
universities and professional schools, in the granting of financial a
id, in hiring and promotions -- crime has become worse and worse. Passing laws 
requiring us to favor them and prohibiting us from discriminating against them 
in any way has made their behavior steadily worse -- not better. 

It used to be that nearly all crimes committed by Blacks were against other 
Blacks. They knew that if they attacked a White person they would be severely 
punished, and besides, segregation kept them pretty much among themselves and 
didn't give them many opportunities for mischief. Now we've taug
ht them that they don't have to fear us or respect us. The controlled media 
have persuaded them that we have oppressed and persecuted them and that 
whatever they do to us serves us right. 

You know and I know that the crime situation can only become worse in the 
future, if for no other reason than that the number of Blacks and other 
minorities will continue growing. We have only to look to the continent of 
Africa in order to see our own future. Before Europeans came to Africa, the
 Blacks there were eating each other, literally, just like the other animals. 
We outlawed cannibalism among the Blacks, and for more than 300 years we tried 
to teach them the ways of civilization. 

Then after the Second World War, in a spasm of lunatic egalitarianism, we 
turned our colonies in Africa over to the indigenous Blacks and left them to 
their own devices: no oppression, no persecution, every advantage for success. 

And what happened? The Blacks reverted to their jungle behavior almost as soon 
as we had left. Even in South Africa, which until very recently was a 
civilized, White country, the jungle is reasserting itself. The financial 
capital, Johannesburg, which a couple of years ago was as safe and clean 
as any city in Europe, has become so crime-ridden since the handing over of the 
country to Black rule that its streets are now among the most dangerous in the 
world, with armed Black gangs prowling in search of prey by day as well as by 
night. It may be another 30 or 40 years before conditions i
n South Africa resemble those in Rwanda or Uganda, but that's exactly where 
they're headed. 

And it may take more than 100 years for America to get there, but that's where 
we're headed too. There is a fundamental law of Nature which also applies to 
the historical process. It is the law of entropy. It tells us that if we have a 
highly developed civilization in one part of the world and a
 jungle society in another part of the world, and we place those two societies 
in contact and let the inhabitants of the jungle society take a hand in the 
running of things, the civilization which used to be highly developed will soon 
take on the characteristics of the jungle society. Ordered so
cieties become disordered, except where the genius for order remains in firm 
control. The tendency is always toward decay, toward dissolution, toward chaos 
and ruin -- except in those rare instances where the vital spark is able to 
assert itself. When that spark is quenched or overwhelmed, decay
 inevitably sets in. 

The vital spark I'm talking about, the genius for order, the spirit of progress 
which built our civilization, is European. Of course, Europeans aren't the only 
race with a vital spark. Every people has its own variety of organizational 
genius. The Japanese have theirs, the Chinese have theirs, a
nd so on. Actually, every form of life has a peculiar genius for organizing the 
non-living matter in its environment into living matter. That's true of worms 
and viruses, of fish and horses. In each case, however, the genius takes a 
unique form, the spark burns with a different brightness. In Bl
ack Africa the spark of civilization always has been very, very dim. Among our 
people it has been very bright. Our government now, however, under the 
influence of the controlled mass media, is pursuing policies which are 
guaranteed to extinguish our spark, policies which are guaranteed to bring 
our level of civilization down to that in Rwanda or Haiti -- not next year, or 
even in the next decade, but eventually. 

Haiti is a good example of the law of entropy. In the 18th century Haiti was 
the jewel among the European colonies in the New World. It was clean and green 
and prosperous. It was civilized. It had an efficient government, thriving 
industry and commerce, and law and order. It was a French island,
 a European island. Then came the egalitarian lunacy, the sheer democratic 
madness, of the French Revolution, which declared Black slaves and White 
masters equal. The consequence of this was that the French with foresight left 
Haiti, and the Blacks, having been persuaded that they were just as c
apable as Frenchmen, massacred the rest, hoping to have Haiti's riches entirely 
for themselves. What happened instead, of course, was that Haiti's civilization 
declined within a few years from the European level to the African level, and 
it has remained there ever since, despite the fact that th
e United States Marines went in and rebuilt Haiti's entire physical 
infrastructure and reorganized its political system earlier in this century. As 
soon as the White Marines left, in 1934, the Black genius for crime, squalor, 
and disorder asserted itself again. So that's our future, if we just s
it back and watch: more and more non-Whites, more and more crime and filth and 
disorder, and eventually, a century or two from now, another Haiti on the 
mainland. 

But we don't have to just sit back and watch. We know how to avoid that dismal 
path of decay and ruin. We know how to solve every problem necessary to get us 
back onto the upward path again. 

Consider illegal immigration, for example, which is responsible for so much of 
the darkening of America. The government and the controlled media pretend that 
illegal immigration is an insoluble problem. They show us on television all the 
holes which Mexicans have cut in the border fence, they sh
ow us groups of Mexicans wading across the Rio Grande, they show us Mexicans 
climbing over the fence and running through the traffic in San Diego to evade 
our Border Patrol, and they wring their hands and tell us that it's just 
impossible to stop illegal immigration. The government says it's ass
igning another 100 Border Patrol agents in one place and it's building a 
stronger fence in another place, but then the Mexicans just come across some 
other part of the border. The government acts like it just doesn't know what to 
do, that it's just too big a problem, that it would take too much 
money to solve. 

But really, that's all just a game calculated to fool the American people. The 
government knows perfectly well how to stop illegal immigration, but it doesn't 
want to stop it. The government just wants to make us believe that it's trying 
its best. But, you know, any of you listeners who've had a
ny military experience understand that illegal immigration can be stopped 
easily, quickly, and permanently. Even I, who've never been in the Army, can 
guarantee you that if I were in charge of the border between the United States 
and Mexico I could completely halt illegal immigration within 24 h
ours, and I could keep it completely halted with far less expense than that now 
required to operate our Border Patrol. All I would do is authorize Border 
Patrol agents to shoot anyone attempting to cross the border illegally. Two or 
three shootings in the first night, in each sector of the borde
r where crossings are frequent, and the word would be out: "Don't try to cross 
the border, unless you want to die."After that, I would spend a couple of 
months erecting a simple fence from San Diego, California, to Brownsville, 
Texas. I'd erect it in two rows 100 feet apart, with mines and elect
ronic sensors planted between the rows. I'd have jeep patrols along our side of 
the fence, patrolling at unpredictable times, but with never more than an hour 
between patrols, and I'd have helicopters patrolling above. I'd do it all with 
a permanent Border Patrol force along the Mexican border o
f 5,000 men, and no illegal immigrants would get through. None. 

The lemmings, of course, would be screaming that I am bloodthirsty, that I am a 
murderer, and so on, but really, fewer Mexicans would have to be shot trying to 
come across the border that first night than law-abiding Americans are now 
being murdered each year by illegal-alien criminals in Califo
rnia and Texas. 

I guess we all tend to be a bit selective in our sympathies. I have sympathy 
for my own people, for the victims of Mexican criminals, and the lemmings have 
sympathy for the criminals. They're Politically Correct, and I'm Politically 
Incorrect. But I would stop illegal immigration, painlessly and
 cleanly, and they prefer to believe that it can't be done. 

The problem of the illegal aliens already in America also can be solved. So can 
the race problem. These problems are more difficult and will require a much 
larger effort than the problem of illegal immigration, but the cost of solving 
them now is infinitesimal compared to the long-term cost of f
ailing to solve them. All we need to solve these problems is the will to 
survive as a people, the will to build the basis for a progressive future for 
our kind, the will to avoid ending up like Haiti or Rwanda a couple of 
centuries hence. 

Of course, we all know that one thing couch potatoes don't have is will. People 
who've been raised on television, who've grown up with a spectator's attitude 
toward the world around them, certainly aren't going to stir themselves just to 
ensure a future for their grandchildren. Instead, they're 
just going to reach for the potato chips and keep on watching. Spectators don't 
count. The people who do count are in two relatively small groups. In one group 
are you and I and the others who care enough about the future of our people to 
do something about it: in fact, to do whatever it takes. 


In the other group are the people who control the mass media, plus their 
collaborators in the government, in the mainstream churches, in the 
universities, in finance and industry, and in the other institutions of our 
society. 

You know who controls the mass media. Many of you also know why they don't want 
the problem of illegal immigration and the other problems threatening our 
future to be solved. They are Jews, and throughout their whole history they 
have lived by two principles: first, always be loyal to your fello
w Jews; and second, always remember that anyone who is not a Jew is your enemy; 
never forget and never forgive. 

Their collaborators in the government and other institutions are individuals 
who have no sense of loyalty to our people and who have a vested interest in 
following the lead of the Jews. Some of them are office holders who understand 
that they hold their offices at the pleasure of those who contr
ol the mass media, those who control public opinion, those who control votes. 
Most of these collaborators have no sense of responsibility to anyone but 
themselves. 

Typical of these is a man who is a friend of an acquaintance of mine; he is an 
assistant district attorney in New York City, a man who understands what's 
going on but who doesn't really care. When challenged to take a stand for his 
own people, he said: "Look. Everyone around here knows that the 
Jews are running the government. It's too bad, but there's nothing we can do 
about it. I've got to look out for myself. I have a career and a family to 
think about. If I want to get ahead, I have to collaborate." 

Unfortunately, there are many, many others among our people who have no more 
sense of personal honor or responsibility than this New York City assistant 
prosecutor. It is a great shame for us. We really need to purge ourselves of 
this shame some day. 

Meanwhile, we can take some comfort in the knowledge that such people, who have 
no loyalty to anyone but themselves, are always ready to switch sides as soon 
as they see the tide turning. The tide is not yet turning -- at least, not 
enough for people like that assistant district attorney in New 
York to notice. The swarm of Brown immigrants from Mexico is still growing from 
week to week, and our government is still making only the most transparent 
pretense of trying to stop them. The couch potatoes are as passive as ever, and 
the Politically Correct lemmings are as idiotic as ever. 

Changes are beginning to take place, however. 

Our weekly radio programs are reaching more and more people. People who hear us 
telling the truth are emboldened to tell the truth themselves. 

The ripples of truth are spreading. Soon those ripples will become waves. And 
one day the storm will break loose over this land.

------------------------------------------------------------------------


About the National Alliance


Probably considered the most disciplined and "hardcore" of American white 
racialist organizations, the National Alliance, directed by Dr. William L. 
Pierce (biography), conducts a wide variety of activities from its headquarters 
in West Virginia, such as: 

•American Dissident Voices, hosted by Kevin Alfred Stom, is an excellent weekly 
radio program broadcast over shortwave and AM radio. Strom's web site, entitled 
"Occupied America" (http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages) 
*******
*******
Fight Anti-White Propaganda by joining the __Western Imperative Network___
by following this URL __http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm ...This is a
not an organization other than posting to Usenet under the ideal 
"WIN" banner. Fight Back!



From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:17:18 EST 1998
Article: 64445 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 98 14:14:01 GMT
Subject:  "Honest" Abraham Lincoln on Negroes
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.nationalism.black,alt.politics.usa,soc.culture.african.american,soc.culture.usa,triangle.politics
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 35
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.54
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!newsfeed.sollentuna.se!Cabal.CESspool!bofh.vszbr.cz!nntp.abs.net!WCG!news-out.netasset.com!news.randori.com!205.218.162.54
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64387 alt.discrimination:64445 alt.politics.nationalism.black:10815 alt.politics.usa.misc:160163 soc.culture.african.american:229458 soc.culture.usa:200405 triangle.politics:29329

"What I would most desire would be the separation of the white and black 
races." (Spoken at Springfield, Illinois on July 17th, 1858; from Abraham 
Lincoln: Complete Works, 1894, Vol. 1, page 273).

"Why should the people of your race be colonized, and where? Why should they 
leave this country? This is, perhaps, the first question for proper 
consideration. You and we are different races. We have between us a broader 
difference than exists between almost any other two races. Whether it is ri
ght or wrong I need not discuss, but this physical difference is a great 
disadvantage to us both, as I think your race suffer very greatly, many of them 
by living among us, while ours suffer from your presence. In a word, we suffer 
on each side. If this be admitted, it affords a reason at least 
why we should be separated. It is better for both, therefore, to be separated." 
(Spoken at the White House to a group of black community leaders, August 14th, 
1862, from Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, Vol 5, page 371).

"I will say, then, that I am not nor have I ever been in favor of bringing 
about in any way the social and political equality of the black and white 
races---that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors 
of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry
 with White people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical 
difference between the White and black races which will ever forbid the two 
races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch 
as they cannot so live, while they do remain together, there m
ust be the position of superior and inferior, and I, as much as any other man, 
am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the White race." (4th 
Lincoln-Douglas debate, September 18th, 1858; Collected Works. Vol. 3, pp. 
145-146).
-=-=-=-=-
Western Imperative Network (WIN)
http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm

National Alliance
http://www.natall.com




From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:17:18 EST 1998
Article: 64457 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 98 23:42:26 GMT
Subject: Re: God and ARYAN man
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,soc.culture.usa,triangle.politics
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
References: 
 <34e6b9e8.1077094@news.univie.ac.at>
Lines: 38
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.40
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news-fra.maz.net!Cabal.CESspool!bofh.vszbr.cz!newsfeed2.uk.ibm.net!ibm.net!news-lond.gip.net!news-peer.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!dca1-hub1.news.digex.net!digex!WCG!news.randori.com!205.218.162.40
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64404 alt.discrimination:64457 soc.culture.usa:200457 triangle.politics:29334



 Thomas Mohr is the hatemonger.
http://www.postfun.com/racetraitor



On 2/15/98 3:48AM, in message <34e6b9e8.1077094@news.univie.ac.at>, Thomas Mohr 
 wrote:

> On Sun, 15 Feb 98 05:48:24 GMT, lambert@morgan.net wrote:
> 
> >The evolved and perfected folk archetype known as Wotan,
> >the Allfather of the Aryan race, has long been revered as the high god
> >of our ancient ancestors. Wotan is not necessarily identical with the
> >image we project of him in time and space. The archetype runs deep
> >within our genetic memory and goes on working as before, like an unknown
> >quantity in the depths of our psyche. 
> 
> Unfortunately for you, everything in the genetic memory can be
> checked. So, your proof that this type of god is genetically inherent
> in whites please ?
> 
> > It should
> >be understood that Wotan is not THE all-knowing incomprehensible God
> >absolute. Everything that we have come to know about Wotan reveals that
> >he, likewise, is personally pursuing an upward path towards the
> >understanding of life's great universal mysteries and perfection,
> >sharing many of our own human characteristics. 
> 
> What for a pathetic God in comparison to the christian God. Your Wotan
> is obviously stumbling through a world he doesn't fully understand. He
> does that just like any human or animal. The concept of the christian
> God is, that he does not only understand the world, but he stands
> outside the universe since he has created it. 
> 
> 




From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:17:19 EST 1998
Article: 64458 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 98 23:48:48 GMT
Subject: Re: "Honest" Abraham Lincoln on Negroes
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.nationalism.black,alt.politics.usa,soc.culture.african.american,soc.culture.usa,triangle.politics
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
References: 
 <34e6fa31.268928345@news.univie.ac.at>
Lines: 37
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.40
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news.IAEhv.nl!news.gmv.es!news-feed1.eu.concert.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!207.207.0.25!nntp.texas.net!WCG!news.randori.com!205.218.162.40
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64405 alt.discrimination:64458 alt.politics.nationalism.black:10822 alt.politics.usa.misc:160207 soc.culture.african.american:229489 soc.culture.usa:200459 triangle.politics:29335

On 2/15/98 8:25AM, in message <34e6fa31.268928345@news.univie.ac.at>, DI Thomas 
Mohr  wrote:

> lambert@morgan.net wrote:
> 
> >"What I would most desire would be the separation of the white and black 
> >races." (Spoken at Springfield, Illinois on July 17th, 1858; from Abraham 
> >Lincoln: Complete Works, 1894, Vol. 1, page 273).
> < snip >
> 
> What do you want to prove with that ? My God, don't you realize that
> this was more than 100 years ago ? Do you know how you seem to me ?
> Like a German saying that there can never be peace with France because
> they took away the Elsass in 1918. Or like a Frenchman saying there
> never can be peace with Germany because the Germans crowned their
> emperor in Versailles in 1870. My God, are you really so pathetic ?
> 
> We write 1998 and not 1865 !
> 


Really? Abraham also said "A government for the people, by the people,
and of the people." Perhaps in 1998, the destruction of sovereign nation-
states like America should succumb to the dissolution of democratic govt
because it was written by a DEAD WHITE MALE in the 1850's !


> >-=-=-=-=-
> >Western Imperative Network (WIN)
> >http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm
> >
> >National Alliance
> >http://www.natall.com
> >
> >
> 




From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:17:19 EST 1998
Article: 64462 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 98 00:54:51 GMT
Subject: RACE: A Biological Concept
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.usa,alt.politics.usa.republican,soc.culture.usa
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 172
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.40
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news.IAEhv.nl!Cabal.CESspool!bofh.vszbr.cz!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news-peer.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!dca1-hub1.news.digex.net!digex!WCG!news.randori.com!205.218.162.40
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64412 alt.discrimination:64462 alt.politics.usa.misc:160218 alt.politics.usa.republican:478577 soc.culture.usa:200469



RACE AS A

BIOLOGICAL CONCEPT

 Dr. J. Philippe Rushton

(November 4, 1996)

Discussion of "race" shows little sign of diminishing, despite efforts to 
deconstruct the concept. Deconstructing the concept of race not only conflicts 
with people's tendency to classify and build family histories according to 
common descent but also ignores the work of biologists studying non-
human species. Ever since 1758, when the Swedish naturalist Carolus Linnaeus 
created the classification system still used in biology today, most zoologists 
have recognized at least the four human subdivisions Linnaeus delineated: 
Asians, American Indians, Europeans, and Africans. (Technically, s
ome would group the first two Linnaean subdivisions together, thus yielding 
three major races, often termed, mongoloids, caucasoids, and negroids.) Such 
high-level classifications do not rule out making finer, hierarchical 
subdivisions within these major groups. 

A race is what zoologists term a variety or subdivision of a species. Each race 
(or variety) is characterized by a more or less distinct combination of 
inherited morphological, behavioral, physiological traits. In flowers, insects, 
and non-human mammals, zoologists consistently and routinely stu
dy the process of racial differentiation. Formation of a new race takes place 
when, over several generations, individuals in one group reproduce more 
frequently among themselves than they do with individuals in other groups. This 
process is most apparent when the individuals live in diverse geog
raphic areas and therefore evolve unique, recognizable adaptations (such as 
skin color) that are advantageous in their specific environments. But 
differentiation also occurs under less extreme circumstances. Zoologists and 
evolutionists refer to such differentiated populations as races. (Within 
the formal taxonomic nomenclature of biology, races are termed subspecies). 
Zoologists have identified two or more races (subspecies) in most mammalian 
species. 

Unless one is a religious fundamentalist and believes that man was created in 
the image and likeness of God, it is foolish to believe that human beings are 
exempt from biological classification and the laws of evolution that apply to 
all other life forms. Of course, individuals vary greatly with
in each racial group and should be treated as such. Nonetheless, much has been 
learned by studying the statistical differences between the various human 
races. In my book Race, Evolution, and Behavior (1995, Transaction Publishers), 
as well as in other recent writings (e.g., the February 1996 is
sue of Current Anthropology), I review the behavioral, morphological, and 
physiological differences between the three major human races -- mongoloid, 
caucasoid, and negroid -- and show that these statistical differences are 
constant across both historical time, national boundaries, and politica
l and economic systems. 

Here I will briefly summarize the findings. Asians and Africans consistently 
aggregate at opposite ends, with Europeans intermediate, on a continuum that 
includes over 60 anatomical and social variables. These 60 variables include 
brain size, intelligence, sexual habits, fertility, personality, 
temperament, speed of maturation, and longevity. If race were an arbitrary, 
socially-constructed concept, devoid of all biological meaning, such consistent 
relationships would not exist. 

Those objecting to the concept of race argue that the taxonomic definitions are 
arbitrary and subjective. Although critics are correct to point out that the 
variation within each race is extremely large, that there is disagreement as to 
exactly how many races there are, and that there is a blurr
ing of category edges because of admixture, they are in error when they claim 
that classifications are arbitrary. For example, race-critic Jared Diamond, in 
the 1994 issue of Discover magazine, surveyed half a dozen geographically 
variable traits and formed very different races depending on whic
h traits he picked. Classifying people using anti-malarial genes, lactose 
tolerance, fingerprint patterns, or skin color resulted in the Swedes of Europe 
being placed in the same category as the Xhosa and Fulani of Africa, the Ainu 
of Japan, and the Italians of Europe. 

Jared Diamond's classifications, however, are arbitrary and nonsensical because 
they have little, if any, predictive value beyond the initial classification. 
More significantly, they confuse the scientific meaning of race, that is, a 
recognizable (or distinguishable) geographic population. In ev
eryday life, as in evolutionary biology, a "negroid" is someone whose ancestors 
were born in sub-Saharan Africa, and likewise for a "caucasoid" and a 
"mongoloid." This definition fits with the temporal bounds offered by the best 
current theory of human evolution. Thus, since Homo sapiens first a
ppeared in Africa about 200,000 years ago, branched off into Europe about 
110,000 years ago, and into Asia 70,000 years after that, a "negroid" is 
someone whose ancestors, between 4,000 and (to accommodate recent migrations) 
20 generations ago, were born in sub-Saharan Africa -- and likewise, fo
r a caucasoid and a mongoloid. 

Social definitions -- that is, self-identification and other-identification 
actually accord quite well with the physical evidence. Mongoloids, caucasoids, 
and negroids can be distinguished on the basis of obvious differences in 
skeletal morphology, hair and facial features, as well by blood grou
ps and DNA fingerprints. Forensic anthropologists regularly classify skeletons 
of decomposed bodies by race. For example, narrow nasal passages and a short 
distance between eye sockets identify a caucasoid person, distinct cheekbones 
characterize a mongoloid person, and nasal openings shaped lik
e an upside down heart typify a negroid person. In certain criminal 
investigations, the race of a perpetrator can be identified from blood, semen, 
and hair samples. To deny the predictive validity of race at this level is 
nonscientific and unrealistic. 

The mean pattern of educational and economic achievement within multi-racial 
countries such as Canada and the United States has increasingly been found to 
prove valid internationally. For example, it is not often recognized, perhaps 
because it contradicts the politically correct theories that in
telligence is purely a matter of socio-economic conditions, that 
Asian-Americans and Asians in Asia often outscore white Americans and white 
Europeans on IQ tests and on tests of educational achievement (even though the 
tests were largely developed by Europeans and white Americans for use in a E
uro-American culture). Blacks in the Caribbean, Britain, Canada and sub-Saharan 
Africa as well as in the United States have low IQ scores relative to whites. 
For violent crime, analyses of INTERPOL data from the 1980s and 1990s show the 
same international distribution that occurs within the Unit
ed States (that is, Asians least, Europeans in the middle, and Africans most). 
A similar racial gradient is found both within the U.S. and globally for 
measures of sexual activity and frequencies of sexually transmitted diseases 
such as AIDS (based on World Health Organization data). 

One neurohormonal contributor to crime and reproductive behavior is 
testosterone. Studies show that black college students and military veterans 
have 3% to 19% more testosterone than their white counterparts. The Japanese 
have even lower amounts than whites. Sex hormones are circulated throughou
t the body and are known to activate many brain-behavior systems involving 
aggression and reproduction. For example, around the world the rate of 
dizygotic twinning per 1,000 births (caused by a double ovulation), is less 
than 4 among Asians, 8 among Europeans, and 16 or greater among Africans. 
The differences in multiple birthing are known to be heritable through the race 
of the mother regardless of the race of the father, as found in Asian/European 
matings in Hawaii and European/African matings in Brazil. 

Publication of The Bell Curve brought widespread public attention to the 
research on race that has been accumulating over the last 30 years in technical 
and specialist journals that demonstrably challenges each and every article of 
the dogma of biological egalitarianism. Startling, and alarming 
to many, is the conclusion that follows from these data that if all people were 
treated the same, most average race differences would not disappear. With 
egalitarianism under siege, there has been a major effort to get the "race 
genie" back in the bottle, to squeeze the previously tabooed toothp
aste back into the tube, to suppress or deny the latest scientific evidence on 
race, genetics, and behavior. 

Regardless of the extent to which the media promote "politically correct," but 
scientifically wrong, resolutions from professional societies such as the 
American Anthropological Association, facts remain facts and require 
appropriate scientific, not political, explanation. On average, the Chines
e, Koreans, and Japanese are more similar to each other and are different from 
Australians, Israelis and the Swedes, who in turn are similar to each other and 
are different from Nigerians, Kenyans, and Jamaicans. None of this should be 
construed as meaning that environmental factors play no part
 individual development. But with each passing year and each new study, the 
evidence for the genetic contribution to individual and group differences 
becomes more firmly established than ever. 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

J. Philippe Rushton is a John Simon Guggenheim Fellow and a professor of 
psychology at the University of Western Ontario in London, Ontario N6A 5C2 
Canada. He holds two doctorates from the University of London (PhD and DSc) and 
is a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Scien
ce and of the American, British, and Canadian Psychological Associations. His 
latest book Race, Evolution, and Behavior (1995, Transaction Publishers, 
telephone 908-445-2280) details the theories and data summarized in this 
article.
-=-=-=-=-=-=
Western Imperative Network (WIN)
http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm

National Alliance
http://www.natall.com

David Duke for President!
http://www.duke.org



From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:17:20 EST 1998
Article: 64464 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 98 01:00:41 GMT
Subject: **100 Racial Facts and One Lie **
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,alt.liberty-vs.conspiracy,soc.culture.usa,triangle.politics
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 803
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.40
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!fu-berlin.de!newsfeed.direct.ca!news.he.net!news.randori.com!205.218.162.40
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64413 alt.discrimination:64464 alt.liberty-vs.conspiracy:672 soc.culture.usa:200471 triangle.politics:29340



Whites & Blacks
100 FACTS
(and one Lie) 

By Roger Roots

Senator Bilbo's Warning:


"If our buildings, our highways, and our railroads should be wrecked, we could 
rebuild them. If our cities should be destroyed, out of the very ruins we could 
erect newer and greater ones. Even if our armed might should be crushed, we 
could rear sons who would redeem our power. But if the blood 
of our White race should become corrupted and mingled with the blood of Africa, 
then the present greatness of the United States of America would be destroyed 
and all hope for civilization would be as impossible for a Negroid America as 
would be redemption and restoration of the Whiteman's blood 
which had been mixed with that of the Negro."
(Senator Theodore G. Bilbo, of Mississippi in 1947) 
In the pages of this booklet are found 100 facts, the vast majority of which 
can be easily verified in any set of encyclopedias, almanacs, psychology text, 
and other reference materials commonly found in any public library.

THE LIE


Cleverly hidden within these hundred facts, for added incentive to read onward, 
is one lie. not a lie of statistical or grammatical error, but a ludicrous 
falsehood at once so absurd as to strike the reader as an insult to human 
intelligence, and yet so deadly evil that if allowed to go unanswer
ed its final cost would be incalculable. I sincerely pledge that my motivations 
are not of insult or hatred, but of the deepest love for mankind and the truest 
concern for its future generations. my purpose is not to deceive but to 
enlighten, and I hope this work will help you reflect and reexam
ine your views on race.

FACT #1: The White race has crossed seas, harnessed rivers, carved mountains, 
tamed deserts, and colonized the most barren icefields. It has been responsible 
for the invention of the printing press, cement, the harnessing of electricity, 
flight, rocketry, astronomy, the telescope, space travel, 
firearms, the transistor, radio, television, the telephone, the lightbulb, 
photography, motion pictures, the phonograph, the electric battery, the 
automobile, the steam engine, railroad transportation, the microscope, 
computers, and millions of other technological miracles. It has discovered cou
ntless medical advances, incredible applications, scientific progress, etc. Its 
members have included such greats as Socrates, Aristotle, Plato, Homer, 
Tacitus, Julius Ceaser, Napoleon, William the Conqueror, Marco Polo, 
Washington, Jefferson, Hitler, Bach, Beethoven, Mozart, Magellan, Columbus,
 Cabot, Edison, GrahamBell, Pasteur, Leeuwenhoek, Mendel, Darwin, Newton, 
Galileo, Watt, Ford, Luther, Devinci, Poe, Tennyson, and thousands upon 
thousands of other notable achievers. (37) (39)

FACT #2: Throughout 6,000 years of recorded history, the Black African Negro 
has invented nothing. Not a written language, weaved cloth, a calendar, a plow, 
a road, a bridge, a railway, a ship, a system of measurement, or even the 
wheel. (Note: This is in reference to the pure-blooded Negro.) He
 is not known to have ever cultivated a single crop or domesticated a single 
animal for his own use (although many powerful and docile beasts abounded 
around him.) His only known means of transporting goods was on the top of his 
hard burry head. For shelter he never progressed beyond the common 
mud hut, the construction of which a beaver or muskrat is capable. (21) (39)

INTELLIGENCE 

FACT #3: The I.Q.'s of American Negroes are from 15 to 20 points, on average, 
below those of American Whites. (26) (16) (18) (22) 

FACT #4: These Black\White differences have been demonstrated repeatedly by 
every test ever conducted by every branch of the U.S. Military, every state, 
county, and local school board, the U.S. Dept. of Education, etc. The same 
ratio of difference has held true over a 40 year period. (18) (26) (
24) 

FACT #5: With an average I.Q. of 85, only 16% of Blacks score over 100, while 
half the White population does. The Negro overlap of White median I.Q.'s ranges 
>from  10 to 25 percent-- equality would require 50 percent. (31) (27) (16)





FACT #6: Blacks are 6 times as likely to have I.Q.'s of 50 to 70 which put them 
in the slow learner (retarded) category, while Whites are ten times more likely 
to score 130 or over. (15) (16) (18) (23)

FACT # 7: The U.S. government's PACE examination, given to 100,000 university 
graduates who are prospective professional or administrative civil-service 
employees each year, is passed with a score of 70 or above by 58% of the whites 
who take it but by only 12% of the Negroes. Among top scorers t
he difference between Negro and White performance is even more striking: 16% of 
the white applicants make scores of 90 or above, while only one-fifth of one 
percent of a Negro applicants score as high as 90--a White/Black success ration 
of 80/1. (27)

FACT #8: Differences between Negro and White children increase with 
chronological age, the gap in performance being largest at the high school and 
college levels. (31) (26)

FACT #9: White/Negro I.Q. differences are constantly excused as results of 
environmental variations. but at least five studies that have attempted to 
equate socio-economic backgrounds of the two races indicate no significant 
change in relative results. As environment improves, the Negro does bet
ter but so does the White. The gap is not decreased. (26) In fact, extensive 
research by DR. G.J. McGurk, associate Professor of Psychology at Villanove 
University, reveals that the gap in intelligence between Blacks and Whites 
INCREASES where socio-economic levels of both races are raised to th
e middle classes. (18)

FACT #10: In 1915, Dr. G.W. Ferfuson took 1000 school children in Virginia, 
divided them into 5 racial categories, and tested them for mental aptitude. On 
average. full-blooded Negroes scored 69.2% as high as Whites. Three-quarter 
Negroes scored 73.0% as high as Whites. One-half Negroes scored 8
1.2% as high as Whites. One-quarter Negroes scored 91.8% as high as Whites. All 
of these Blacks lived as and considered themselves "Negroes." Their 
environments and "advantages" or disadvantages were exactly the same. (14) Also 
see (26) pg 452.

FACT #11: Results of the Army Beta test given by the U.S. Army to over 386,000 
illiterate soldiers in WWI showed Negro draftees to be "inferior to the Whites 
on all types of tests used in the Army." Additionally, tests were conducted 
upon pure Negroes, Mulattoes, and Quadroons. It was found that
 "the lighter groups made better scores." (14)

FACT #12: Studies conducted with identical twins raised apart in radically 
different environments provide conclusive evidence that over-all influence of 
heredity exceeds that of environment in a ratio of about 3 to 1. (41)

FACT #13: Even when Blacks and Whites have the same backgrounds, in terms of 
family income and childhood advantages, Blacks still have average I.Q. scores 
12 to 15 points lower than comparable Whites. This includes cases where Black 
children have been adopted by White parents. Their I.Q.s may be
 improved by environment, but they are still closer to their biological parents 
than their adoptive parents. (3) (15) (26)

FACT #14: Equalitarian ideologists often discount I.Q. test results with the 
excuse that they are culturally biased. Nonetheless, NO ONE, not the NAACP nor 
the United Negro College Fund, nor NEA had been able to develop an intelligence 
test which shows Blacks and Whites scoring equally. (15) (42
) (3)

FACT # 15: American Indians, who often live in conditions far worse than 
American Blacks during their entire lives, still consistently outscore them on 
I.Q. tests. (3) (27)

FACT #16: The offspring of interracial marriages tend to have lower I.Q.s than 
the white parent. (11) (26)

THE NEGRO BRAIN 

FACT #17: Among human races numerous studies have been made of the 
comparative weight of White and Negro brains with results that fell within the 
range of about an 8-12 percent lower weight for the Negro brain. Such studies 
have been conducted by Bean, Pearl, Vint, Tilney, Gordon, Todd,
 and others. (23) (27)

FACT #18: In addition to the difference in brain weight, the Negro brain grows 
less after puberty than the white. Though the Negro brain and nervous system 
mature faster than the white brain, its development is arrested at an earlier 
age which limits further intellectual advancement. (22) (27)

FACT #19: The thickness of the supragranular layer (the outside layer) of the 
Negro brain is about 15 percent thinner, and its convolutions are fewer and 
more simple, on average, than that of the White brain. (9)

FACT #20: The frontal lobes of the Negro brain, responsible for abstract 
conceptional reasoning, are smaller relative to body weight, less fissured, and 
less complex than those of the White brain. (9) (27) (23) (22)

ANTHROPOLOGY


FACT #21: The name Homo sapien was first used by the 18th Century Swedish 
botanist Carolus Linnaeus. The word "sapien" means "wise." The name was 
originally used to speak of the White man and synonymous with "europaeus." As a 
result, many later taxonomists and geneticists believed that Negroes a
nd other races should be classified as different species. In fact, Darwin 
declared in The Descent of Man that the varieties of mankind are so distinct 
that similar differences found in any other animal would warrant their 
classification in different species, if not different genera. (39)

FACT #22: For his mammoth work, The Origin of Races, Professor Carleton Coon, 
President of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists and the 
premier geneticist of the world, assembled massive evidence from geography, 
anatomy, genetics, physiology, comparative dentition, linguistics, a
rcheology, and fossil records from 300 bone-bearing sites to verify his theory 
of pre-sapien racianation." In other words, Homo erectus was divided by race 
even before evolution into Homo sapien stage. (12)

FACT #23: According to Dr. Coon, while the Caucasoid subspecies (the White 
race) was evolving in Europe, the Negro race was standing still on the 
evolutionary plane and is today no less than 200,000 years behind the European 
in skull and brain development. (9)

FACT #24: The Negro skull, in addition to having a smaller brain volume and 
thicker cranial bones than that of the White, is prognathous; i.e., the lower 
face projects forward, rather in the manner of an animal's muzzle. In 
consequence, the Negro jaw is substantially longer, relative to its widt
h, than the White jaw. A feature of the Negro lower jaw is its retention of a 
vestige of the "simian shelf," a bony region immediately behind the incisors. 
The simian shelf is a distinguishing characteristic of apes, and it is absent 
in Whites. (9) (12) (39)

FACT #25: The skin of the Negro is thicker and possibly superior to the White's 
in the way it impedes the penetration of germs and in its protection from the 
ultraviolet rays of the sun. (39) (14)

FACT #26: The dark color of the Negro is due to melanin pigment which is spread 
through every layer of the skin and is found even in the muscles and brain. (9) 
(27)

FACT #27: An African dentist can tell a Negro's tooth from a white man's at a 
glance. (14)

FACT #28: Negroes have arms which are longer, relative to body height, than 
those of Whites. This feature, together with their much thicker cranial bones, 
gives Black athletes an advantage over Whites in boxing. The skeletal and 
muscular peculiarities of Negroes' lower limbs have given them cons
iderable success as sprinters, but have left them relative undistinguished as 
distance runners. (39) (27)

FACT #29: ADDITIONAL DIFFERENCES 

•The hair is black, crispy, and "woolly" in texture, it is flat and elliptical 
with no central canal or duct like the hair of Europeans. •The nose is thick, 
broad and flat, often turned up nostrils exposing the red inner lining of the 
mucous membrane similar to an ape. •The arms and legs of the 
Negro are relatively longer than the European. The humerus is a trifle shorter 
and the forearm longer thereby approximating the simian form. •The eyes are 
prominent, iris black and the orbits large. The eye often has a yellowish 
sclerotic coat over it like that of a gorilla. •The Negro has a sho
rter trunk the cross-section of the chest is more circular than whites. The 
pelvis is narrower and longer as it is in an ape. •The mouth is wide with very 
thick, large and protruding lips. •Negro skin has a thick superficial horny 
layer which resists scratching and impedes the penetration of ger
ms. •The Negro has a larger and shorter neck akin to that of anthropoids. •The 
cranial sutures are more simple than in the white type and close together 
earlier. •The ears are roundish, rather small, standing somewhat high and 
detached thus approaching the simian form. •The Negro is more powerfu
lly developed from the pelvis down and the white more powerfully developed in 
the chest. •The jaw is larger and stronger and protrudes outward which, along 
with lower retreating forehead, gives a facial angle of 68 to 70 degrees as 
opposed to a facial angle of 80 to 82 degrees for Europeans. •Th
e hands and fingers are proportionally narrower and longer. The wrist and 
ankles are shorter and more robust. •The frontal and paricial bones of the 
cranium are less excavated and less capacious. The skull is thicker especially 
on the sides. •The brain of the Negro on the average is 9 to 20% sma
ller than whites. •The teeth are larger and are wider apart than in the white 
race. •The three curvatures of the spine are less pronounced in the Negro than 
in the white and thus more characteristic of an ape. •The femur of the Negro is 
less oblique, the tibia (shin bone) more curved and bent fo
rward, the calf of the leg high and but little developed. •The heel is broad 
and projecting, the foot long and broad but slightly arched causing flat soles, 
the great toe is shorter than in the white. •The two bones proper of the nose 
are occasionally united, as in apes. 

FACT #30: Blood group studies made during WWII suggest the American Negro gene 
pool is about 28% white. --This despite all manner of institutional 
discrimination, social segregation, etc. Keep in mind that the results of test 
>from  true Black Africans would show even bigger differences from White
s. (32) (14)

CRIME

FACT #31: The rate at which Blacks commit murder is thirteen times that of 
Whites; Rape and assault, ten times. These figures, as given by the F.B.I. 
reports, vary somewhat from year to year but fairly represent the trend for the 
past decade. (27) (6) (13)

FACT #32: According to the justice Dept, 1 in every 4 Black males between the 
ages of 20 and 29 is currently in prison or on probation or parole. (32) (6) (3)

FACT #33: Though only 12% of the U.S. population, Blacks commit more than half 
of all rapes and robberies and 60% of all murders in the U.S. (32) (27) (6)

FACT #34: Approximately 50% of all Black males will be arrested and charged 
with a serious felony during their lifetime. (27)

FACT #35: A Black person is 56 TIMES more likely to attack a White person than 
Vice Versa. (3) (32)

FACT #36: Black rapists choose White victims over half (54.9%) of the time, 30X 
as often as Whites choose Blacks. (2) (32) (28)

FACT #37: The annual report from the Department of justice shows that when 
Whites commit violence they do it to Blacks 2.4% of the time. Blacks, on the 
other hand, choose White victims MORE THAN HALF the time. (3)

FACT #38: In New York City, any White is over 300 TIMES MORE LIKELY to be 
assaulted by a gang of Blacks than is a Black by a gang of Whites. (32)

FACT #39: Many people argue that high Black incarceration rates show that 
police center enforcement at Black crimes and ignore white-collar crimes. 
However, Blacks commit a disproportionate number of white-collar offenses as 
well. In 1990, Blacks were nearly 3 times as likely to be arrested for 
forgery, counterfeiting, and embezzlement as Whites. (32) (6) 

FACT #40: Many people believe that crime is a product of poverty and lack of 
"advantages." However, the District of Columbia, which enjoys the highest 
average annual salaries and is second only to Alaska in personal income per 
capita, leads the nation in just about every category of crime includ
ing murder, robbery, aggravated assault, and vehicle theft. D.C. also has the 
country's strictest gun control, highest police costs per capita, highest 
ration of police and correctional officers per citizen, and highest rate of 
incarceration. Its permanent population is over 80% Black. West Virg
inia, which has the nation's lowest crime rate, suffers from chronic poverty 
and has the highest unemployment in the U.S. It also has the fewest police per 
capita. West Virginia is over 96% White. (33)

THE BLACK FAMILY

FACT #41 46% of inner city Black men between the ages of 16 and 62 are 
unemployed. (27)

FACT #42: More than 66% of the children of Negroes are born out of wedlock. Per 
capita, their illegitimacy rate is ten times that of Whites. (32) (27)

FACT #43: Blacks are four and a half times more likely than Whites to be on 
welfare. (32)

FACT #44: More than 35% of all Black men in U.S. Cities are drug or alcohol 
abusers. (27)

BEAUTY

FACT #45: The January l986 issue of the journal of Ethnic and Racial Studies, 
"Skin Color Preference, Sexual Dimorphism and Sexual Selection: a case of 
Gene-Culture Co-evolution?" by Peter Frost and Pierre Van der Herghe, stated 
that in any given race, the women tend to have lighter complexions 
than the men. Using standard ethnographic files from 51 societies on five 
continents which have recorded their preference for human skin color, the study 
found that 30 preferred lighter women and 14 preferred lighter women and 
lighter men. The cultures of India, China, Brazil and Bali, as well a
s the Arabs and Negroes regard the lightest women as the most beautiful. 
--perpetuating the aesthetic appeal of the ivory-skinned, rosy-cheeked, 
blue-eyed, blond "nordic ideal" of feminine beauty- -even though they 
themselves do not possess the genetic capacity to reproduce such an organism. 
Ove
r time, the study said, the upper classes of all races have become 
lighter-skinned than their fellow countrymen because they have repeatedly 
skimmed off fairer women from the lower classes. (Also see #11)

FACT #46: Scientific research on what constitutes human beauty, in which 300 
judges of various backgrounds were shown portrait photographs and asked to rate 
the beauty of the individual's face, has revealed that nordic Whites are 
universally recognized as the most attractive humans, even by Blac
ks. The judges were instructed to evaluate the faces solely on his or her 
"personal standards of beauty and not to consider popular norms." The results 
of the study "Age, Sex, Race, and the Perception of Facial Beauty." 
Developmental Psychology, 5, Nov., 1971, pp 433-439, are reprinted below.

GROUP BEAUTY RATINGS
IN CROSS AND CROSS STUDY 


JUDGES'                   GROUP GIVEN
CHARACTERISTICS          HIGHEST RATING
---------------          --------------
Age 7 white males         white adolescent males 
Age 7 black males         white adolescent males 
Age 7 white females       white adolescent females 
Age 12 white males        white adolescent females
Age 12 black males        white adolescent females 
Age 12 white females      white adolescent females 
Age 12 black females      white adolescent females 
Age 17 white males        white adolescent females 
Age 17 black males        white adolescent females 
Age 17 white females      white adolescent females 
Age 17 black females      white adolescent females 
Adult white males         white adolescent females 
Adult black males         white adolescent females 
Adult white females       white adolescent males 
Adult black females       white adolescent females



FACT #47: In experiments in which Black children have been left to themselves 
with White and Black dolls, it has been found tha most of the them would rather 
play with White dolls. This is true all over the world. Even in such places as 
Tobago. (32) (22) (23)

AMERICAN HISTORY 

FACT #48: The Declaration of Independence, which contains the oft-repeated 
phrase ". . . all men are created equal . . ." was written by Thomas Jefferson, 
who owned about 200 slaves at the time and never set any of them free, 
including the mulattoes and quadroons. Jefferson's words certainly had
 no reference to Negroes, who at that time had no place in American society 
except as property. (27) (38) (31)

FACT #49: The Constitution was written by and for 'We the people" and dedicated 
to "ourselves and our posterity," All of the 55 delegates that met in 
Philadelphia to draft the Constitution and all of the members of the 13 state 
conventions that ratified it were of the White race. (38)

WEBSTER'S DICTIONARY OF 1828 defines Posterity as: POSTERITY. 1. Descendants; 
children, children's children, etc. indefinitely; the race that proceeds from a 
progenitor. 2. In a general sense, succeeding generations; opposed to 
ancestors. . .

FACT #50: The 14th Amendment is invalid for the following reasons: 

•It was never ratified by three-fourth of all the States in the Union according 
to Article 5 of the U.S. Constitution. Out of 37 States, 16 had rejected it. 
•Many of the States who were counted as ratifying it, were compelled to do so 
under duress of military occupation. Any legal act entered in
to under force duress, and coercion is automatically null and void. •The fact 
that 23 Senators had been unlawfully excluded from the U.S. Senate, shows that 
the Joint Resolution proposing the Amendment was not submitted to or adopted by 
a constitutional Congress. •The intent of the 14th Amendmen
t is repugnant to the original U.S. Constitution and the Organic Law of the 
land. It did not, and could not, repeal anything that was part of the Organic 
Law. Therefore the principles of precedent and stare decisis render it void. 
(23) 

FACT #51: In Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation of Sept. 1862 he said: 
"I have urged the colonization of the Negroes, (back to Africa), and I shall 
continue. My Emancipation Proclamation was linked with this plan (of 
colonization). There is no room for two distinct races of White men in
 America, much less for two distinct races of Whites and Blacks. . . . I can 
think of no greater calamity than the assimilation of the negro into our social 
and political life as our equal . . . Within twenty years we can peacefully 
colonize the Negro . . . under conditions in which he can rise 
to the full measure of manhood. This he can never do here. We can never attain 
the ideal union our fathers dreamed, with millions of an alien, inferior race 
among us, whose assimilation is neither possible nor desirable." (27)

FACT #52: Lincoln actually proposed an amendment to the constitution that 
would've authorized congress to recolonize all freed Blacks back to Africa. On 
Aug. 15, l962, Congress did appropriate over half a million dollars for that 
purpose. Thousands of Negroes had been shipped back when Lincoln w
as shot. (27)

WASHINGTON D.C.

FACT #53: The District of Columbia, which is approximately 70% Black, leads the 
U.S. in many areas: 

•The nations highest crime rates •Strictest gun control •Highest incarceration 
rates •Highest birthrate •Highest death rate •Highest rate of federal 
assistance per capita •Highest number of welfare recipients per capita •Highest 
rate of illegitimacy •Highest high school dropout rate even though 
its teachers are the highest paid in the U.S. •Highest rate of ghonnorrhea and 
syphilis •Highest incidence of AIDS (33) (32) 

PORTUGAL

FACT #54: Populated by White stock, the nation of Portugal rose in four 
centuries to be the wealthiest most powerful country in the world. A great 
commercial and maritime power, it had large colonies in Asia, Africa, and 
America. Its seamen were the first to explore western Africa and they broug
ht back hundreds of Negro slaves. By 1550, at the height of Portugal's power, 
one-tenth of its population were Blacks. Today, Portugal's population is 
described as one of the most homogeneous in Europe, having slowly absorbed the 
Negro gene pool. As of l975 it had lost all of its outside territo
ries. Its workers are the lowest paid in Europe and they have the highest rate 
of illiteracy and a high infant mortality rate. In terms of art, literature, 
music, science and philosophy the "new" Portugal has produced virtually nothing 
in 100 years and by most standards is the most backward nati
on in Europe. *Keep in mind that the Black population of the U.S. is 
approximately 13%. (27)

HAITI

FACT #55: The Republic of Haiti, the only completely Black republic in the 
Western Hemisphere also happens to be the poorest country in the Western 
Hemisphere. It also has the lowest life expectancy, highest illiteracy, lowest 
per capita consumption of newsprint, lowest per capita GNP, and the l
owest level of political stability. (27)

FACT #56: Haiti once had a promising future. Before 1789 as a French colony 
under White rule, San Domingo (Haiti) was as rich or richer in productivity as 
all the 13 American Colonies combined. It was considered the "crown jewel" of 
the French colonial system, and was in fact the most prosperous
 colony anywhere in the world. Populated by 40,000 Whites, 27,000 freed 
Mulattoes, and 450,000 Black slaves and with a bountiful climate and productive 
soil, it supplied all of France and half of Europe with sugar, coffee, and 
cotton. But in 1791, the French government issued a decree ordering H
aiti to give the vote to the Mulattoes, and soon after another ordering freedom 
for all the slaves. This resulted in a bloody civil war in which the entire 
White population (about 40,000 Frenchmen) was murdered, down to the last man, 
woman, and child. Rape, decapitation, and mutilation were comm
itted almost universally upon their bodies. (22) (23)

FACT #57: After the Blacks massacred the last of the White population in 1804, 
Haiti remained a part of Santa Domingo, until 1844 when it became a separate 
"republic." Between 1844 and 1915 only one Haitian president completed his term 
in office. Fourteen were ousted by armed uprisings, one was 
blown up, one was poisoned and another was hacked to pieces by a mob. Between 
1908 and 1915 the revolutions and assassinations increased so rapidly that a 
United States military occupation was needed to restore order. This lasted from 
1915 to 1934. Thereafter followed twelve years of rule by a M
ulatto elite which ended in the resumption of control by the Black military in 
1946. Since then wholesale corruption and political murder have been the rule. 
(23)

INDIA

FACT #58: India's Negroid peoples have been subjected to numerous White 
invasions for over 5000 years, prompting the rise and fall of one civilization 
after another as the White invaders became absorbed into the non-White masses. 
Then, about 1800 B.C. Aryans again invaded from the northwest, thi
s time establishing a rigid caste ("varna." meaning color) system of White 
supremacy which eventually evolved into an integral part of the Hindu religion. 
Interracial mixing was banned and punishable by death. (5) (37)

FACT #59: Led by an Aryan ruling class, Classical India blossomed into a great 
culture, giving expression to philosophy, poetry, science, mathematics, and 
literature. The land prospered as never before --or after. 

FACT #60: The caste system lasted about 2,000 years (probably longer than any 
civilization under similar racial circumstances.) However, eventually the 
castes broke down due to miscegenation and by modern times virtually no pure 
Whites were remaining. (39) (37) (10)

FACT #61: Today, India has 834 million people who speak 150 different languages 
and dialects. When the annual rainfall is insufficient, they die of starvation 
at a rate of 2,000,000 to 6,000,000 per year. India has the highest birthrate 
in Asia, one of the lowest per capita incomes in the world,
 and an illiteracy rate close to 70%. (35) (33)

EGYPT

FACT #62: Ancient Egypt was founded and built by Mediterranean Caucasians as 
far back as 4500 B.C. Egypt's period of greatness was from 3400 B.C. to 1800 
B.C. and was characterized by its amazing architecture, pyramids, temples, and 
mastery of mathematics and engineering, the remnants of which a
re still evident today. The White Egyptians pioneered medicine, chemistry, 
astronomy, and law; In many cases, their achievements remain unequalled. (37) 
(39) (21)

FACT #63: But, about 3400 B.C. Egypt civilization began to spread up the Nile 
River, bringing it in close contact with the black Nubians to the south. Soon 
they were using Blacks for slave labor and Egypt became history's first melting 
pot. (39) (10) (14)

FACT # 64: In time the infusion of Negro blood worked itself up from the bottom 
of Egyptian society. The slaves were eventually freed, received political 
equality, and took posts of authority in government. (10) (37)

FACT #65: By the time of King Tut (1370-1352 B.C.) even the ruling classes had 
been mongrelized and Egypt began a tailspin downward. Today, the once-mighty 
Egypt is very much a Third World country, having lost its art, its medicine, 
its architectural ability, and its position in world affairs. (
10) (37)

The absurd notion that Ancient Egypt was a product of Negro ingenuity is now 
being widely disseminated in the schools. Though scholars know this is a 
blatant lie, they justify the deception by assuming it will boost the 
"self-esteem" of Black children.

SOUTH AFRICA
(Note: These facts will most likely change drastically now that South Africa 
has fallen under black rule.)

FACT #66: White people have lived in South Africa much longer than Negroes. 
There have been White settlements in South Africa for over 300 years, about the 
same length of time Europeans have lived in North America. Even 150 years after 
the first colonies around Capetown, at the beginning of the 
19th Century, there still were no Blacks within 500 miles. The Blacks wandered 
in from central Africa later on, possibly fleeing the slave trade or due to 
famine. In fact, most of South Africa's Blacks were born in other countries. 
(29) (8) (14)

FACT #67: South Africa is by far the wealthiest and most advanced country in 
Africa, producing nearly 75% of the continent's Gross National Product. It is 
almost completely self- sufficient so boycotts have little affect upon its 
economy. In fact most of Africa is dependent upon South Africa. So
uth Africa is governed by a Western parliamentary republic and strictly 
segregated racially. South Africa grants complete self-government to the Blacks 
in their own areas of the country. (29) (8) (14)

FACT #68: Though South Africa is perpetually criticized by the world press for 
its racial separatism, its Blacks live better than the Blacks of any other 
African country and are multiplying rapidly and healthily. 87% of Black welfare 
costs are being paid by the White man. This includes food, clo
thing, training, housing, education an health care. --even old age pensions. 
(14)

FACT #69: Thousands of South African Blacks graduate from college every year, 
more than three times as many as in the rest of Africa combined. Every Black 
child is within walking distance of a primary school. Africa's largest 
hospital, which serves Blacks almost exclusively and performs over 180
0 operations per month, is in South Africa. (14)

FACT #70: The Blacks of South Africa own more cars than do all the citizens of 
the Soviet Union. (29)

FACT #71: South Africa has more Black doctors, lawyers, professional people, 
and millionaires than all of the rest of the world combined. (8)

FACT #72: In fact, conditions are "so bad" for Blacks in South Africa that the 
country has a tremendous problem with illegal Black immigration, having over 
one million illegal foreign workers. (14) (29)

ICELAND

FACT #73-75: Iceland, the only all-White nation in the world, has the world's 
highest literacy rate. 100%. It is an island of cooled volcanic magma, located 
Just south of the Arctic Circle. It has no coal, no fuel, no timber, no mineral 
wealth or natural resources, and no navigable rivers. 75% o
f the interior is uninhabitable and only about 1% of the land is arable. It is 
the youngest nation in Europe and one of the most isolated countries in the 
world. Nonetheless, Iceland is #2 in the world in life expectancy and has one 
of the world's highest standards of living, in terms of per cap
ita income. It has tremendous medical facilities and a thriving publishing 
business. Virtually every family has a telephone. Upon graduation from high 
school, each Icelandic student has learned five languages. (33)

MARTIN LUTHER KING

FACT #75-77: On Jan. 31, 1977, Martin Luther King's FBI records were sealed by 
court order until the year 2027 because, as his wife said, "its release would 
destroy his reputation" These records are rumored to contain instances of 
bizarre sexual perversion and homosexuality, and proof that King 
was under the direct orders of Soviet spies and financed by the Communist 
Party. 

FACT #78: The Wall Street Journal (Nov.9, 1990) disclosed that Stanford 
University editors of The Papers of Martin Luther King Jr. have long known that 
King was guilty of plagiarism in his l955 Boston University doctoral thesis, 
having lifted significant portions from the works of other writers 
and graduate students.

FACT #79: Martin Luther King frequently enjoyed prostitutes and paid for them 
with his church's money. Still, congress has voted to make King's birthday a 
national holiday, in most places replacing Columbus Day or Washington's 
Birthday as an official observance.

FACT #80: Almost every state in the union has a King holiday, and almost every 
city has a King Boulevard or King Civic Center. Yet the electoral evidence 
suggests that Americans will almost always vote down honors for King when given 
a chance. (41)

MISCELLANEOUS

FACT #81: The entire continent of Africa, perhaps Earth's richest land, 
accounts for only 3% of world trade. (27)

FACT #82-84: Almost all Blacks who have been leaders in fields other than 
athletics or music have had some White ancestry: Fredick Douglas, W.E.B. 
Dubois, Booker T. Washington, George Washington Carver, Alex Hailey, Thurgood 
Marshall, Bryant Gumbell, Colin Powell, Carl Rowan, Ed Bradley, Doug Wi
lder, etc. According to Dr. E.B. Reuter, ". . . Of successful and best known 
men that the Negro race has produced, at least thirteen- fourteenths are men of 
mixed blood. (27) (21)

FACT #85: Blacks are 50 times more likely to have syphilis than Whites. (32)

FACT #86: Twice as many Blacks as Whites receive dishonorable discharge from 
the U.S. military. (32)

FACT #87: A White woman is 15 times more likely to contract AIDS by engaging in 
sex with a Negro than with a White heterosexual. (U.S. Centers for Disease 
Control) 

FACT #88: 90% of U.S. children with AIDS are Black or Hispanic. (36)

FACT # 89-92: In l950, American schools were among the best in the world. 
However, vocal elements within our society demanded that the public schools 
take on a social engineering role as well as an educational one. Violent 
disruptions of American education were ordered by the Supreme Court for t
he purpose of breaking down racial barriers. For 30 years, American schools 
have diverted enormous resources into forced integration, quotas, and bussing 
operations. (Few people realize how expensive bussing is. Annual cost may run 
into tens of billions of dollars. In l990 California alone was s
pending $500 million per year on integration. Many school districts spend a 
quarter or more of their budgets on transportation. In Milwaukee alone and in a 
single school year, 30,000 staff hours were diverted into calculating the race 
of students to attend the various schools.) The results? Toda
y's students rank at the very bottom worldwide in science and math, some 40% of 
American adults are functionally illiterate, and standardized test scores have 
declined steadily for both Whites and Blacks. Today the average White still 
scores 200 points higher on the combined SAT than the average
 Black. Americans spend more on education than any other country in the world 
and have the worst results. Massive White flight to escape racial zoning has 
reduced the tax base of every major American city. In l983, after nearly two 
generations of racial experimentation to promote equality, the r
esearch arm of the Dept. of Education could not produce a single study that 
showed Black children were learning appreciably better after desegregation. 
(25) (20) (32)

FACT #93: In Black Africa the average ruler lasts 7 months. (22) (27) (7)

FACT #94: By 1995, a third of U.S. students will be non-Whites and Whites will 
be a minority in the school districts of 5 states. (32)

FACT #95: Dr. William Shockley, Nobel prize winner for his work in the 
invention of the transistor and renowned geneticist as Stanford University, 
said, "The major cause for American Negroes' hereditary is origin and thus not 
remedial to a major degree by improvement in environment."

FACT #96: In 1930, about 33% of the world was White. Today, the U.N. estimates 
that only about 9.5% of the world's population is Caucasian. This percentage is 
falling rapidly. (34) (27)

FACT #97: Every race has an equal capacity to learn and contribute to 
civilization and any differences are caused by prejudice and racism. The fact 
that white skins are associated with civilization is merely a quirk of fortune 
and coincidence. Any attempt to distinguish the races is motivated by
 paranoia and hatred. We must prevent any investigation into the subject and 
work to melt society together into a receless, nationless, harmonious utopia. 
(?)

FACT #98: In 1988 there were 9,406 cases of Black-on-White rape and fewer than 
10 cases of White on Black rape in the U.S. (32)

FACT #99: For the book INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT, by Raymond 
Cattell, three distinguished American scholars compare massive evidence of 
national I.Q. score averages worldwide and warn against the decline of any 
nation whose population reflects declining intelligence. Taking into cons
ideration the differential birthrates of American ethnic stocks, they concluded 
that American ability is declining rapidly. (21)

FACT #100: The American taxpayers have spent over $2.5 TRILLION trying to 
upgrade Blacks since the l960's. (6)

FACT #101: QUOTES "The Negroes' rude ignorance has never invented any effectual 
weapons of defense or destruction: they appear incapable of forming any 
extensive plans of government or conquest: and the obvious inferiority of their 
mental faculties has been discovered and abused by the nations o
f the temperate zone." --Edward Gibbon, the great historian and author of THE 
DECLINE AND FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE, (V.III, pg. 277) "Wherever you find the 
Negro everything is going down around him, and wherever you find the White man 
you see everything around him improving." --Robert E. Lee, to
 Col. Thomas H. Carter, May, l965 

SOURCES


1.African Business Magazine, Dec. '91 2.American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 92, 
pg 822+ 3.American Renaissance, Dec. '90, Box 2504, Menlo Park, CA 94026 
4.American Sociological Review, Vol 45, pg. 859 5.Basham, A.L., The Wonder That 
Was India, Grove Press, New York, NY 1954 6.Buckley, William F.
 syndicated column, Jan. 5. 1993 7."But What about Africa?" Harper's, May '90 
8."The Christian Heritage of South Africa Under Attack!", Peter Hammond, Herald 
the Coming, Dec. '92. 9.Coon, Carleton S. The Origin of Races, 1962, Alfred A. 
Knopf 10.Fagan, Myron C. How the Greatest White Nations Wer
e Mongrelized - Then Negroized, Sons of Liberty Books. 11.Fields, Dr. Ed, The 
Dangers of Interracial Marriage, PO Box 1211, Marietta, GA 30061 12.Howells, 
William. Mankind So Far, Doubleday, Garden City, NY 1945. 13.Harris, Marvin, 
1981. Why Nothing Works. Simon & Schuster, New York, NY 14.Jacob
, A. White Man, Think Again! 1965, publ. by author. 15.Jensen, Arthur R. Bias 
in Mental Testing, The Free Press, New York 1980 16.Jensen, Arthur R. Straight 
Talk About Mental Tests, the Free Press. (Macmillan) New York, 1981 
17.McCall's, May '92, pg 76 18.McGurk, Frank, "A Scientist's Report on 
Race Differences." U.S. News and World Report, Sept. 21, 1956. Washington, D.C. 
19.Pearson, Roger, Eugenics and Race, 1966, Noontide Press 20.Pearson, Roger. 
Race, Intelligence, and Bias in Academe, Scott-Townsend Publishers, N.W. 
Washington, D.C. 21.Pendell, Elmer, Sex Versus Civilization, Noon
tide Press. 22.Putnam, Carleton. Race and Reason, 1961, Howard Allen Press, 
Cape Canaveral, FL 23.Putnam, Carleton. Race and Reality, a Search for 
Solutions, 1967, Howard Allen, Box 76, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 24.Putnam, 
Carleton. A Study in Racial Realities, an address at the University of Cal
ifornia at Davis, Dec. 17, 1964 25.Scott, Ralph. Education and Ethnicity: The 
U.S. Experiment in School Integration, Scott-Townsend. Washington, D.C. 1989 
26.Shuey, Audrey H., The Testing of Negro Intelligence, Social Science Press, 
New York, 1966 27.Simpson, William Gayley. Which Way Western Ma
n? 1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535, Washington, D. C. 20007 28.Social 
Forces, Vol. 69, pg.1+, Sept. '90 29."South Africa: Time to Choose Sides" 
Soldier of Fortune, Dec. '89. 30.Snyderman, Mark, and Rothman, Stanely. The IQ 
Controversy, the Media and Public Policy. Transaction Publishers,
 New Brunswick, NJ 1990. 31.Stell v Savannah-Chattham County Board of 
Education, U.S. District Court, Southern Georgia, May 13, 1963. 32.Taylor, 
Jared, Paved with Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in 
Contemporary America. 1992, Carrol & Graf. New York, NY 33.World Almanacs, '88, 
'89
, '90, '91, '92 34.United Nations World Census, 1990 35.Van Loon, Henrick, 
1940, Van Loon's Geography, Garden City Publ. 36.The Voice, Feb. 27, 1990. 
37.Waddell, L. A. The Makers of Civilization, 1929, Angriff Press, Hollywood, 
CA 38.Weisman, Charles A. America: Free, White and Christian, 1989, 
SFA, Box 766-c, LaPorte, CO 80535 39.Weisman, Charles A. The Origins of Race 
and Civilization, 1990, SFA 40.Weyl, Nathaniel. The Geography of American 
Achievement, Scott-Townsend, Washington, D.C. 1989. 41.Martin Luther King (Man 
Behind the Myth) by Des Griffin. 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Western Imperative Network (WIN)
http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm

National Alliance (Europeans Only)
http://www.natall.com

David Duke for President
http://www.duke.org





------------------------------------------------------------------------





American Civil Rights Review
The web's first and only known unabashed collection of both positive and 
negative civil rights publications for student comparison and contrast papers, 
general reading, and just plain surfin'. 






From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:17:20 EST 1998
Article: 64466 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 98 01:16:23 GMT
Subject: **What is Racism?********************************
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.usa.republican,soc.culture.usa,triangle.politics
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 244
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.40
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news.cs.ucla.edu!news.greennet.net!uunet!in4.uu.net!news.randori.com!205.218.162.40
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64422 alt.discrimination:64466 alt.politics.usa.republican:478591 soc.culture.usa:200477 triangle.politics:29342



What Is Racism?

by Thomas Jackson 

Originally Published in American Renaissance, Vol 2, No. 8 
------------------------------------------------------------------------


There is surely no nation in the world that holds "racism" in greater horror 
than does the United States. Compared to other kinds of offenses, it is thought 
to be somehow more reprehensible. The press and public have become so used to 
tales of murder, rape, robbery, and arson, that any but the m
ost spectacular crimes are shrugged off as part of the inevitable texture of 
American life. "Racism" is never shrugged off. For example, when a white 
Georgetown Law School student reported earlier this year that black students 
are not as qualified as white students, it set off a booming, nationa
l controversy about "racism." If the student had merely murdered someone he 
would have attracted far less attention and criticism. 

Racism is, indeed, the national obsession. Universities are on full alert for 
it, newspapers and politicians denounce it, churches preach against it, America 
is said to be racked with it, but just what is racism? 

Dictionaries are not much help in understanding what is meant by the word. They 
usually define it as the belief that one's own ethnic stock is superior to 
others, or as the belief that culture and behavior are rooted in race. When 
Americans speak of racism they mean a great deal more than this. 
Nevertheless, the dictionary definition of racism is a clue to understanding 
what Americans do mean. A peculiarly American meaning derives from the current 
dogma that all ethnic stocks are equal. Despite clear evidence to the contrary, 
all races have been declared to be equally talented and hard
- working, and anyone who questions the dogma is thought to be not merely wrong 
but evil. 

The dogma has logical consequences that are profoundly important. If blacks, 
for example, are equal to whites in every way, what accounts for their poverty, 
criminality, and dissipation? Since any theory of racial differences has been 
outlawed, the only possible explanation for black failure is 
white racism. And since blacks are markedly poor, crime-prone, and dissipated, 
America must be racked with pervasive racism. Nothing else could be keeping 
them in such an abject state. 

All public discourse on race today is locked into this rigid logic. Any 
explanation for black failure that does not depend on white wickedness 
threatens to veer off into the forbidden territory of racial differences. Thus, 
even if today's whites can find in their hearts no desire to oppress blac
ks, yesterday's whites must have oppressed them. If whites do not consciously 
oppress blacks, they must oppress them Unconsciously. If no obviously racist 
individuals can be identified, then societal institutions must be racist. Or, 
since blacks are failing so terribly in America, there simply m
ust be millions of white people we do not know about, who are working day and 
night to keep blacks in misery. The dogma of racial equality leaves no room for 
an explanation of black failure that is not, in some fashion, an indictment of 
white people. 

The logical consequences of this are clear. Since we are required to believe 
that the only explanation for non-white failure is white racism, every time a 
non-white is poor, commits a crime, goes on welfare, or takes drugs, white 
society stands accused of yet another act of racism. All failure o
r misbehavior by non-whites is standing proof that white society is riddled 
with hatred and bigotry. For precisely so long as non-whites fail to succeed in 
life at exactly the same level as whites, whites will be, by definition, 
thwarting and oppressing them. This obligatory pattern of thinking 
leads to strange conclusions. First of all, racism is a sin that is thought to 
be committed almost exclusively by white people. Indeed, a black congressman 
>from  Chicago, Gus Savage, and Coleman Young, the black mayor of Detroit, have 
argued that only white people can be racist. Likewise, in 1987
, the affirmative action officer of the State Insurance Fund of New York issued 
a company pamphlet in which she explained that all whites are racist and that 
only whites can be racist. How else could the plight of blacks be explained 
without flirting with the possibility of racial inequality? 

Although some blacks and liberal whites concede that non-whites can, perhaps, 
be racist, they invariably add that non-whites have been forced into it as 
self-defense because of centuries of white oppression. What appears to be 
non-white racism is so understandable and forgivable that it hardly d
eserves the name. Thus, whether or not an act is called racism depends on the 
race of the racist. What would surely be called racism when done by whites is 
thought to be normal when done by anyone else. The reverse is also true. 

Examples of this sort of double standard are so common, it is almost tedious to 
list them: When a white man kills a black man and uses the word "nigger" while 
doing so, there is an enormous media uproar and the nation beats its collective 
breast; when members of the black Yahweh cult carry out r
itual murders of random whites, the media are silent (see AR of March, 1991). 
College campuses forbid pejorative statements about non-whites as "racist," but 
ignore scurrilous attacks on whites. 

At election time, if 60 percent of the white voters vote for a white candidate, 
and 95 percent of the black voters vote for the black opponent, it is white who 
are accused of racial bias. There are 107 "historically black" colleges, whose 
fundamental blackness must be preserved in the name of di
versity, but all historically white colleges must be forcibly integrated in the 
name of... the same thing. To resist would be racist. 

"Black pride" is said to be a wonderful and worthy thing, but anything that 
could be construed as an expression of white pride is a form of hatred. It is 
perfectly natural for third-world immigrants to expect school instruction and 
driver's tests in their own languages, whereas for native Americ
ans to ask them to learn English is racist. 

Blatant anti-white prejudice, in the form of affirmative action, is now the law 
of the land. Anything remotely like affirmative action, if practiced in favor 
of whites, would be attacked as despicable favoritism. 

All across the country, black, Hispanic, and Asian clubs and caucuses are 
thought to be fine expressions of ethnic solidarity, but any club or 
association expressly for whites is by definition racist. The National 
Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) campaigns openly for 
bla
ck advantage but is a respected "civil rights" organization. The National 
Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) campaigns merely for 
equal treatment of all races, but is said to be viciously racist. 

At a few college campuses, students opposed to affirmative action have set up 
student unions for whites, analogous to those for blacks, Hispanics, etc, and 
have been roundly condemned as racists. Recently, when the white students at 
Lowell High School in San Francisco found themselves to be a mi
nority, they asked for a racially exclusive club like the ones that non- whites 
have. They were turned down in horror. Indeed, in America today, any club not 
specifically formed to be a white enclave but whose members simply happen all 
to be white is branded as racist. 

Today, one of the favorite slogans that define the asymmetric quality of 
American racism is "celebration of diversity." It has begun to dawn on a few 
people that "diversity" is always achieved at the expense of whites (and 
sometimes men), and never the other way around. No one proposes that Howa
rd University be made more diverse by admitting whites, Hispanics, or Asians. 
No one ever suggests that National Hispanic University in San Jose (CA) would 
benefit from the diversity of having non-Hispanics on campus. No one suggests 
that the Black Congressional Caucus or the executive ranks of 
the NAACP or the Mexican-American Legal Defense and Educational Fund suffer 
>from  a lack of diversity. Somehow, it is perfectly legitimate for them to 
celebrate homogeneity. And yet any all-white group - a company, a town, a 
school, a club, a neighborhood - is thought to suffer from a crippling l
ack of diversity that must be remedied as quickly as possible. Only when whites 
have been reduced to a minority has "diversity" been achieved. 

Let us put it bluntly: To "celebrate" or "embrace" diversity, as we are so 
often asked to do, is no different from deploring an excess of whites. In fact, 
the entire nation is thought to suffer from an excess of whites. Our current 
immigration policies are structured so that approximately 90 per
cent of our annual 800,000 legal immigrants are non-white. The several million 
illegal immigrants that enter the country every year are virtually all 
non-white. It would be racist not to be grateful for this laudable contribution 
to "diversity." It is, of course, only white nations that are call
ed upon to practice this kind of "diversity." It is almost criminal to imagine 
a nation of any other race countenancing blatant dispossession of this kind. 

What if the United States were pouring its poorest, least educated citizens 
across the border into Mexico? Could anyone be fooled into thinking that Mexico 
was being "culturally enriched?" What if the state of Chihuahua were losing its 
majority population to poor whites who demanded that schools
 be taught in English, who insisted on celebrating the Fourth of July, who 
demanded the right to vote even if they weren't citizens, who clamored for 
"affirmative action" in jobs and schooling? 

Would Mexico - or any other non-white nation - tolerate this kind of cultural 
and demographic depredation? Of course not. Yet white Americans are supposed to 
look upon the flood of Hispanics and Asians entering their country as a 
priceless cultural gift. They are supposed to "celebrate" their ow
n loss of influence, their own dwindling numbers, their own dispossession, for 
to do otherwise would be hopelessly racist. 

There is another curious asymmetry about American racism. When non- whites 
advance their own racial purposes, no one ever accuses them of "hating" another 
group. Blacks can join "civil rights" groups and Hispanics can be activists 
without fear of being branded as bigots and hate mongers. They ca
n agitate openly for racial preferences that can come only at the expense of 
whites. They can demand preferential treatment of all kinds without anyone ever 
suggesting that they are "anti-white." 

Whites, on the other hand, need only express their opposition to affirmative 
action to be called haters. They need only subject racial policies that are 
clearly prejudicial to themselves to be called racists. Should they actually go 
so far as to say that they prefer the company of their own kind
, that they wish to be left alone to enjoy the fruits of their European 
heritage, they are irredeemably wicked and hateful. 

Here, then is the final, baffling inconsistency about American race relations. 
All non-whites are allowed to prefer the company of their own kind, to think of 
themselves as groups with interests distinct from those of the whole, and to 
work openly for group advantage. None of this is thought to 
be racist. At the same time, whites must also champion the racial interests of 
non-whites. They must sacrifice their own future on the altar of "diversity" 
and cooperate in their own dispossession. They are to encourage, even to 
subsidize, the displacement of a European people and culture by ali
en peoples and cultures. To put it in the simplest possible terms, white people 
are cheerfully to slaughter their own society, to commit racial and cultural 
suicide. To refuse to do so would be racism. 

Of course, the entire non-white enterprise in the United States is perfectly 
natural and healthy. Nothing could be more natural than to love one's people 
and to hope that it should flourish. Filipinos and El Salvadorans are doubtless 
astonished to discover that simply by setting foot in the Unit
ed States they are entitled to affirmative action preferences over native-born 
whites, but can they be blamed for accepting them? Is it surprising that they 
should want their languages, their cultures, their brothers and sisters to take 
possession and put their mark indelibly on the land? If the
 once-great people of a once-great nation is bent upon self-destruction and is 
prepared to hand over land and power to whomever shows up and asks for it, why 
should Mexicans and Cambodians complain? 

No, it is the white enterprise in the United States that is unnatural, 
unhealthy, and without historical precedent. Whites have let themselves be 
convinced that it is racist merely to object to dispossession, much less to 
work for their own interests. Never in the history of the world has a domi
nant people thrown open the gates to strangers, and poured out its wealth to 
aliens. Never before has a people been fooled into thinking that there was 
virtue or nobility in surrendering its heritage, and giving away to others its 
place in history. Of all the races in America, only whites have b
een tricked into thinking that a preference for one's own kind is racism. Only 
whites are ever told that a love for their own people is somehow "hatred" of 
others. All healthy people prefer the company of their own kind, and it has 
nothing to do with hatred. All men love their families more than
 their neighbors, but this does not mean that they hate their neighbors. Whites 
who love their racial family need bear no ill will towards non-whites. They 
only wish to be left alone to participate in the unfolding of their racial and 
cultural destinies. 

What whites in America are being asked to do is therefore utterly unnatural. 
They are being asked to devote themselves to the interests of other races and 
to ignore the interests of their own. This is like asking a man to forsake his 
own children and love the children of his neighbors, since to 
do otherwise would be "racist." 

What then, is "racism?" It is considerably more than any dictionary is likely 
to say. It is any opposition by whites to official policies of racial 
preference for non-whites. It is any preference by whites for their own people 
and culture. It is any resistance by whites to the idea of becoming a
 minority people. It is any unwillingness to be pushed aside. It is, in short, 
any of the normal aspirations of people-hood that have defined nations since 
the beginning of history - but only so long as the aspirations are those of 
whites. 
-=-=-=-=-=-==--

Western Imperative Network (WIN)
http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm

National Alliance (Europeans Only)
http://www.natall.com




From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:17:21 EST 1998
Article: 64467 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 98 01:20:12 GMT
Subject: What is (Aryan) Nationalism ?
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.usa.republican,soc.culture.usa,triangle.politics
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 152
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.40
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!fu-berlin.de!nntp.abs.net!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!nntp.texas.net!WCG!news.randori.com!205.218.162.40
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64423 alt.discrimination:64467 alt.politics.usa.republican:478593 soc.culture.usa:200478 triangle.politics:29343



Introduction to Nationalism

By Arthur E. LeBouthillier 

We hear much about nationalism in the news and even from some in the White 
movement. Usually, nationalism is maligned as a bad thing leading to 
disintegration and mass violence. To the media, it is the stability-threatening 
force that causes governments to fall. To those in the White movement, i
t is the force that causes White brothers to fight each other. However, a 
better understanding of nationalism is necessary to appreciate its true role in 
world politics and how it relates to our own movement. 

There are many myths about what nationalism is. For many, nationalism only 
evidences itself as warfare between ethnic groups or as the force that 
destabilizes multi-ethnic countries. However, this view misses a much more 
important fact about nationalism: that it is something that affects people'
s everyday actions in many positive ways while never causing them to engage in 
acts of violence. Another myth about nationalism is that it is something 
fundamentally different from racism. In fact, the basis of nationalism can be 
one or more of several influences such as religion, race, language
 or other factors. 

Nationalism 

Nationalism is a complex phenomenon that is not always immediately easy to 
grasp. It is a whole ideological viewpoint that affects all aspects of one's 
every day political, cultural, economic and social life. As Anthony D. Smith 
defines it in Nationalism in the Twentieth Century, it is "...the i
deological movement for the attainment and maintenance of autonomy, cohesion, 
and individuality for a social group, some of whose members conceive it to be 
an actual or potential nation." In accordance with this definition, it can be 
seen that virtually any activity taken on behalf of the nation
 (a social group) could be considered a "nationalistic act." Such things as 
writing poetry to spread the ideals of the nation, learning the historical 
dances of that nation, speaking in the historical language of that people, or 
engaging in politics on behalf of the nation's interests are all "n
ationalistic acts." In extreme cases, nationalism does evidence itself as 
ethnic warfare when two or more ethnic groups compete at the expense of each 
other's interests. According to John Breuilly in Nationalism and the State: 



•A nationalist argument is a political doctrine built upon three basic 
assertions: 
1.There exists a nation with an explicit and peculiar character 2.The interests 
and values of this nation take priority over all other interests and values. 
3.The nation must be as independent as possible. This usually requires at least 
attainment of political sovereignty. [Breuilly, 1982. p 3] 





In accordance with the above definitions, one can see that our own movement to 
ensure the survival of the White race is a nationalist movement. This is even 
more strikingly evident when one considers Aryan Nation's own slogan: "Your 
race is your nation." This slogan is an obvious statement linki
ng racial and nationalistic arguments and ideals. 

The State 

Nationalists make explicit distinctions between the nation, which is a social 
group, and the State, which is a government that rules over one or more 
nations. Therefore, nationalists often state that nationalism is love of one's 
people, whereby patriotism is love of the State. It is important to
 understand this difference between nationalism and patriotism since most 
arguments against nationalism are patriotic attempts to ensure the survival of 
a particular State. 

As a political institution, the State is an entity with its own interests. 
States derive their power from the number of people whom they are able to tax 
and control through laws and by force. Because of this, there is a conflict of 
interests between the State and the nation. Often, States find i
t necessary to suppress nationalistic feelings and disenfranchise national 
groups in order to secure their dominance. Where several ethnic groups exist in 
a single State, the State must compromise one group's national interests in 
order to satisfy the desires of minority groups or to assure stan
ding in the eyes of other nations or States of the world. Often, minority 
groups are able to assume control of the State apparatus and thus make it an 
instrument of their own ends. To the nationalist, often the only viable State 
is one that is expressly structure to protect and promote his own n
ation above all others; therefore, multi-ethnic States are seen as 
illegitimate. 

The Nation 

The key concept in understanding nationalism is knowing the meaning of the word 
nation. Contrary to the everyday use of the word nation, which often includes 
the many different ethnic groups existing in a certain State, the nationalist 
definition of nation is those people who believe they belong
 together because they are a social group bound by blood, language, culture, 
religion or other factors. As Walker Conner says, "The essence of the nation is 
a psychological bond that joins a people and differentiates it, in the 
subconscious convictions of its members, from all non-members in a m
ost vital way" [Conner, 1994. p 197]. There are many such bonds, but perhaps 
the strongest national identity is that founded on race (lineage or bloodline). 
"In sharpest contrast with most academic analysts of nationalism, those who 
have successfully mobilized nations have understood that at the
 core of ethnopsychology is the sense of shared blood, and they have not 
hesitated to appeal to it" [Conner, p 197]. Other bases of ethnic identity 
include many other features such as language, folkways, historical viewpoints 
and other characteristics. 

The White Nationalist Perspective 

With the above understanding of nations and States, we Whites can examine our 
own situation better. Phrasing our position in terms of the basic nationalist 
arguments, one can state that we Whites are a nation, that the interests and 
values of that nation take priority over all others and that we
 must be as independent as possible. Therefore, we must embark on a program 
leading towards greater sovereignty and security for our nation. We must not 
let ANY government impose policies and programs that are harmful to our 
nation's interests. 

We must recognize that the U.S. Government, as a State, has subverted the 
interests of our nation and that unless measures are taken to bolster our 
nation, all that we hold as dear will be destroyed. 

Conclusion 

Nationalism is a social movement by a people seeking the maintenance of their 
group. The key element in nationalism is the nation, a social group of those 
people who believe that they belong together because of common characteristics 
and interests. By putting the interests of their social group 
ahead of all other interests, they are able to ensure its survival. Because 
they put the interests of their people first, nations are often in conflict 
with the States in which they reside. This most often results in a desire for 
political sovereignty by nations. The nationalist model applies to
 the White movement in North America. With a better understanding of 
nationalism, one can learn to utilize the tactics of other nationalist 
movements around the world. 

References 

Breuilly, John. 1982. Nationalism and the State. ISBN 0-312-56005-2. 

Conner, Walker. 1994. "Beyond Reason: The Nature of the Ethnonational Bond." in 
Ethnonationalism: The Quest for Understanding. Princeton University Press. ISBN 
0-691-02563-0. 

Smith, Anthony D. 1979. Nationalism in the Twentieth Century. ISBN 
0-8147-7803-8. 
-=-=-==-=-=-
Western Imperative Network (WIN)
http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm

National Alliance (Europeans Only)
http://www.natall.com





From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:17:21 EST 1998
Article: 64468 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 98 01:24:09 GMT
Subject: Mark Twain on Indian Savages
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,alt.nswpp,alt.politics.white-power,soc.culture.usa
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 140
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.40
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!WCG!news.randori.com!205.218.162.40
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64425 alt.discrimination:64468 alt.nswpp:11420 alt.politics.white-power:116154 soc.culture.usa:200479

The Noble Red Man?

by Mark Twain

>from  American Renaissance  December, 1991

Although it is difficult to imagine an era more receptive to ethnic flummery 
than the present, the impulse to glorify the Indian is scarcely new.  In 1870, 
Mark Twain, never a man to leave foolishness unrebuked, vented his contempt for 
worshipful accounts of imaginary Indians. His essay, which o
riginally appeared in the September issue of The Galaxy, is omitted from most 
anthologies. 

In books he is tall and tawny, muscular, straight and of kingly presence; he 
has a beaked nose and an eagle eye. 

His hair is glossy, and as black as the raven's wing; out of its massed 
richness springs a sheaf of brilliant feathers; in his ears and nose are silver 
ornaments; on his arms and wrists and ankles are broad silver bands and 
bracelets; his buckskin hunting suit is gallantly fringed, and the belt 
and the moccasins wonderfully flowered with colored beads; and when, rainbowed 
with his war-paint, he stands at full height, with his crimson blanket wrapped 
about him, his quiver at his back, his bow and tomahawk projecting upward from 
his folded arms, and his eagle eye gazing at specks against
 the far horizon which even the paleface's field-glass could scarcely reach, he 
is a being to fall down and worship. 

His language is intensely figurative. He never speaks of the moon, but always 
of "the eye of the night;" nor of the wind as the wind, but as "the whisper of 
the Great Spirit;" and so forth and so on. His power of condensation is 
marvelous. In some publications he seldom says anything but "Waugh!
" and this, with a page of explanation by the author, reveals a whole world of 
thought and wisdom that before lay concealed in that one little word. 

He is noble. He is true and loyal; not even imminent death can shake his 
peerless faithfulness. His heart is a well-spring of truth, and of generous 
impulses, and of knightly magnanimity. With him, gratitude is religion; do him 
a kindness, and at the end of a lifetime he has not forgotten it. Ea
t of his bread, or offer him yours, and the bond of hospitality is sealed--a 
bond which is forever inviolable with him. 

He loves the dark-eyed daughter of the forest, the dusky maiden of faultless 
form and rich attire, the pride of the tribe, the all-beautiful. He talks to 
her in a low voice, at twilight of his deeds on the war-path and in the chase, 
and of the grand achievements of his ancestors; and she listens
 with downcast eyes, "wh ile a richer hue mantles her dusky cheek." 

Such is the Noble Red Man in print. But out on the plains and in the mountains, 
not being on dress parade, not being gotten up to see company, he is under no 
obligation to be other than his natural self, and therefore: 

He is little, and scrawny, and black, and dirty; and, judged by even the most 
charitable of our canons of human excellence, is thoroughly pitiful and 
contemptible. There is nothing in his eye or his nose that is attractive, and 
if there is anything in his hair that--however, that is a feature wh
ich will not bear too close examination . . . He wears no bracelets on his arms 
or ankles; his hunting suit is gallantly fringed, but not intentionally; when 
he does not wear his disgusting rabbit-skin robe, his hunting suit consists 
wholly of the half of a horse blanket brought over in the Pint
a or the Mayflower, and frayed out and fringed by inveterate use. He is not 
rich enough to possess a belt; he never owned a moccasin or wore a shoe in his 
life; and truly he is nothing but a poor, filthy, naked scurvy vagabond, whom 
to exterminate were a charity to the Creator's worthier insects
 and reptiles which he oppresses. Still, when contact with the white man has 
given to the Noble Son of the Forest certain cloudy impressions of 
civilization, and aspirations after a nobler life, he presently appears in 
public with one boot on and one shoe--shirtless, and wearing ripped and patch
ed and buttonless pants which he holds up with his left hand--his execrable 
rabbit-skin robe flowing from his shoulder--an old hoop-skirt on, outside of 
it--a necklace of battered sardine-boxes and oyster-cans reposing on his bare 
breast--a venerable flint-lock musket in his right hand--a weathe
r-beaten stove-pipe hat on, canted "gallusly" to starboard, and the lid off and 
hanging by a thread or two; and when he thus appears, and waits patiently 
around a saloon till he gets a chance to strike a "swell" attitude before a 
looking-glass, he is a good, fair, desirable subject for extermina
tion if ever there was one. 

There is nothing figurative, or moonshiny, or sentimental about his language. 
It is very simple and unostentatious, and consists of plain, straightforward 
lies.  His "wisdom" conferred upon an idiot would leave that idiot helpless 
indeed. 

He is ignoble--base and treacherous, and hateful in every way. Not even 
imminent death can startle him into a spasm of virtue. The ruling trait of all 
savages is a greedy and consuming selfishness, and in our Noble Red Man it is 
found in its amplest development. His heart is a cesspool of falseh
ood, of treachery, and of low and devilish instincts. With him, gratitude is an 
unknown emotion; and when one does him a kindness, it is safest to keep the 
face toward him, lest the reward be an arrow in the back. To accept of a favor 
>from  him is to assume a debt which you can never repay to his
 satisfaction, though you bankrupt yourself trying. To give him a dinner when 
he is starving, is to precipitate the whole hungry tribe upon your hospitality, 
for he will go straight and fetch them, men, women, children, and dogs, and 
these they will huddle patiently around your door, or flatten 
their noses against your window, day aft er day, gazing beseechingly upon every 
mouthful you take, and unconsciously swallowing when you swallow! The scum of 
the earth! 

And the Noble Son of the Plains becomes a mighty hunter in the due and proper 
season. That season is the summer, and the prey that a number of the tribes 
hunt is crickets and grasshoppers! The warriors, old men, women, and children, 
spread themselves abroad in the plain and drive the hopping cre
atures before them into a ring of fire. I could describe the feast that then 
follows, without missing a detail, if I thought the reader would stand it. 

All history and honest observation will show that the Red Man is a skulking 
coward and a windy braggart, who strikes without warning--usually from an 
ambush or under cover of night, and nearly always bringing a force of about 
five or six to one against his enemy; kills helpless women and little 
children, and massacres th e men in their beds; and then brags about it as long 
as he lives, and his son and his grandson and great-grandson after him glorify 
it among the "heroic deeds of their ancestors." A regiment of Fenians will fill 
the whole world with the noise of it when they are gettin
g ready invade Canada; but when the Red Man declares war, the first intimation 
his friend the white man whom he supped with at twilight has of it, is when the 
war-whoop rings in his ears and tomahawk sinks into his brain. . . . 

The Noble Red Man seldom goes prating loving foolishness to a splendidly 
caparisoned blushing maid at twilight. No; he trades a crippled horse, or a 
damaged musket, or a dog, or a gallon of grasshoppers, and an inefficient old 
mother for her, and makes her work like an abject slave all the rest 
of her life to compensate him for the outlay. He never works himself. She 
builds the habitation, when they use one (it consists in hanging half a dozen 
rags over the weather side of a sage-brush bush to roost un der); gathers and 
brings home the fuel; takes care of the raw-boned pony when they p
ossess such grandeur; she walks and carries her nursing cubs while he rides. 
She wears no clothing save the fragrant rabbit-skin robe which her 
great-grandmother before her wore, and all the "blushing" she does can be 
removed with soap and a towel, provided it is only four or five weeks old and 
not caked. 

Such is the genuine Noble Aborigine. I did not get him from books, but from 
personal observation. 

-=-=-==-=-
Western Imperative Network (WIN)
http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm

National Alliance (Europeans Only)
http://www.natall.com



From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:17:21 EST 1998
Article: 64489 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 98 06:55:26 GMT
Subject: I Preach Black Power !
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.usa,soc.culture.usa
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 56
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.47
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!fu-berlin.de!newsfeed.direct.ca!news.he.net!news.randori.com!205.218.162.47
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64452 alt.discrimination:64489 alt.politics.usa.misc:160284 soc.culture.usa:200548

(from a black nationalist posting on soc.culture.african.american)

We who seek self-determination to retain our genetic and cultural 
uniqueness shall win!!!!! --A White Man --Please read the black's
post below:

(Begins)

This is an interesting paradox; the concept of placing blacks in the
socio-political and business structures of foreign cultures to gain
"power" without establishing a base of operation. In other words, the
same black conservatives that are fiercely opposed to the creation and
establishment of anything that is black operated and controlled, turn
around and tell us that we need to see more blacks put in political and
corporate positions so that "we" can have representation. I have one
question; who is this "we" that they are referring to? The popular
phrase used by these conservatives is, "you have to play the other man's
game and get inside. Once you are in THEN you can make moves."

 I have no
problem with the concept of infiltration, but this mode of thinking
leaves out the most important variable. If a Palestinian spy were to
infiltrate into a position of power within the Israeli government, who
would they be reporting the information back to? The Palestine
government, right? If a Chinese spy were to infiltrate into a foreign
government and retrieve vital information, it would no doubt be
transferred back to the Chinese government. When a black spy infiltrates
into the Eurocentric power structure and achieves a high political or
corporate position, who is he/she reporting this vital information back
to? Themselves? What are they...SOLO SPYS??? Instead of a organized,
concrete socio-economic and political structure that black leadership is
accountable to, black leadership and conservatives endorse a vague,
ambiguous "we" concept that no one answers to. 

Question: Why would our so-called "representatives" take choose the
Vague over the concrete?

Answer: They are pimping the masses of our people and withholding
information and political education for manipulative purposes. ALL OF
OUR LEADERS. Before anyone says, "What about so and so?", the answer is
ALL OF OUR LEADERS. EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM.
******

Western Imperative Network (WIN)
http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm

National Alliance -- Europeans Only!
http://www.natall.com

America's Forgotten White Slaves
http://www.hoffman-info.com








From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:17:21 EST 1998
Article: 64492 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 98 00:16:19 GMT
Subject: Farrakhan: Black Hero Part II
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.usa,triangle.politics
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 160
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.40
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!newsfeed.sollentuna.se!newsxfer.visi.net!WCG!news.randori.com!205.218.162.40
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64458 alt.discrimination:64492 alt.politics.usa.misc:160292 triangle.politics:29353



Interview with the Arizona Republic:

WHO IS FARRAKHAN? 
PART II


------------------------------------------------------------------------
On March 25, 1996, the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan was interviewed by
editors and reporters at the Arizona Republic Newspaper in Phoenix. 
------------------------------------------------------------------------


ARIZONA REPUBLIC (AR): What's the aim of the next march coming up? 

MINISTER LOUIS FARRAKHAN MLF: I don't envision a march at all. Right now the 
serious work is mobilizing people for spiritual, moral, social, political and 
economic action. Marches are good, but that Million Man March was designed to 
draw men out, to encourage men to take their God-given role and
 responsibility as heads for their families, as builders of our community and 
protectors of our women and children. It was designed to help us see the abuse 
that we have heaped on our women and that the abuse must cease. Our effort now 
is to mobilize our people in the 400 or more cities where we
 have the March Local Organizing Committees, and we hope to organize in the 
states. At the very outset of the summer, we hope to have a political 
convention of the Black and the oppressed where we intend to develop an 
agenda... what we feel is in the best interest of all the people. 

AR: Will you be drafting a platform, a formal document or agenda? 

MLF: It will be a formal document that we would like to introduce to those who 
are making the platforms of both parties, or even the three parties, because 
Mr. Perot now has a Reform Party, and we will not leave him out of this 
equation. 

AR: Will this platform also include an international agenda? You just returned 
>from  Africa...? 

MLF: Yes! No foreign power needs to guide or instruct me, or us, in being 
concerned about what happens in Africa, what happens in the Caribbean, what 
happens in Central and South America. For the American people to travel and you 
hear the slogan, "Yankee, go home," why is that happening? It's no
t because the average American traveler has done some evil to the peoples of 
the world. The American people do not know what their government has done to 
nations on this earth through overt and covert policies, policies that 
destabilize other nations, policies that call for the assassination of 
other leaders, and the installing of leaders that are more favorable to the 
interest of big business in America, at the expenses of their own citizenry.
..Being a Muslim, I'm concerned about the assassination attempt on Muammar 
Gadhafi; I'm concerned about the embargo on Libya; I'm concerned about why all 
the regimes that are on America's embargo list are mainly Muslim. Why is this? 
You say it's because they are fundamentalists, they're terrori
st..
And how do you define that? 

President Hafez Al-Assad in Syria mentioned to me a conversation he had with 
President George Bush ; they were discussing terrorists. He said he houses in 
Syria some of the hard-liner Palestinians. There was an effort to get him to 
push them out of Syria, not give they any home in Syria. Accordi
ng to Hafez Al-Assad, he asked President Bush why doesn't the United Nations, 
led by George Bush or the American government, come up with a definition of 
terrorism and what constitutes a terrorist state. Once that definition is laid 
into international law as a standard by which we judge a nation
, then we apply that standard to every nation. He said he has not heard from 
Mr. Bush on that. 

So when America doesn't like a regime, for whatever the reason, we just say it 
was a terrorist regime. Terrorism is in the eye of the beholder. The Boston Tea 
Party was not a tea party. You ask the British, was that a terrorist action? 
They'll say it certainly was. The Americans, however, will s
ay it was a blow that was struck for our freedom. 

This is not to be taken from Louis Farrakhan as any acceptance of terrorism. 
For me, as a human being, to see bodies littered over the streets in Jerusalem, 
or for me to hear of bodies falling out of the sky from Pan Am (Flight) 103... 
but for God's sake, don't you ever ask yourself the question
 : Why would a person strap themselves with a bomb, knowing they're going to 
die but they want to make others die when life is the most precious gift that 
God has given? Why is that? 

Have you ever plumbed the depth of depravity of human beings when they are 
deprived of justice in any court for the legitimate redress of grievances? Do 
you, as an American, understand what it's like to be displaced from your 
homeland and have others tell you that this is ours by Divine right; a
nd they (Palestinians) are made vagabonds in the earth? Since they (Zionists) 
have international power and every avenue for the redress of their 
(Palestinian) legitimate grievances (is cut off), how are they going to get 
your attention? 

This is insanity to do what they're doing, but they have been driven to that 
point, and the driver refuses to recognize that he's in the driver's seat. 
America has a responsibility, not just in the peace process, but in the process 
of getting justice for those who have been deprived of it. If Am
erica does not pursue justice, she will never be a real pursuer of peace. It 
says in the scripture: They shall say peace, peace, peace, and they shall seek 
peace, but they shall not find it. 

America has to listen to voices that seem unpatriotic. I believe that I am a 
friend and not an enemy... You're not really what you say you are and somebody 
has to point it out. Whether America likes it or not, I believe I'm born to do 
just that. Thanks be to God that the founding fathers of this
 nation put it in the Bill of Rights that there's freedom of speech. That, and 
that alone, allows America to be corrected when she goes off course. There will 
always be a voice standing up. What we've got to do is, instead of bashing the 
voice, let's see if there is anything to the voice. 

AR: You mentioned that you think the government would like to get you into 
court. That's a very big issue right now. Recent stories coming out of 
Washington indicate that the Federal government is very interested in your 
World Tour. What do you expect to happen on that front? What was your purpo
se in making that tour? How is that going to play into what you think that the 
government may or may not do? 

MLF: Since I believe I am A Jesus, walking in the footsteps of THE Jesus, I saw 
that Million Man March in a scriptural light, like Jesus going into Jerusalem 
riding on a donkey to the "hosannas" of the people. I saw my call of Black men, 
who are the biggest problem in the country, and their resp
onding to my call as similar to Jesus going to the tomb of Lazarus, and calling 
Lazarus out of that tomb. 

There were many "hosannas" that day from he masses of the people, who were so 
overjoyed to look around and see a sea of Black men and they were hugging and 
embracing each other in love, which is something which they never, ever, ever 
did before in their life; and for that I got a "hosanna, hosan
na." Well, what does that mean? If you look at J. Edgar Hoover's work with the 
Counter-Intelligence Program, J. Edgar Hoover said his work was to stop what? 
The rise of a "Black Messiah." Who could do what? Unite the nationalist groups. 
Now, mind you, I already said I am not THE Messiah. I'm cle
ar on that. But I believe that I am a functionary of His. 

America has never countenanced any Black leader that had the influence over the 
masses of the people and they didn't control that individual. So I knew, or 
believed, that my crucifixion was at hand. I believe that after the Million Man 
March they (government) saw Farrakhan as a danger more so th
an they ever had seen me before. And thanks to the blessing of CNN, and CSPAN, 
and the other news media, the Million Man March took Farrakhan all over the 
world and allowed people who were fascinated by that number of Black men to 
hear more than a 30-second (sound) bite on Minister Farrakhan. Be
ing concerned that the destruction of the Nation of Islam was imminent - I 
could already see the signs in "separating the message from the Messenger" and 
then separating the people from the man, and this is from Clinton, and Dole, 
and Gingrich. These are powerful people. When they speak, there's
 a whole lot behind their words. They've got government apparatus behind their 
words. 

My intention, going on the World Friendship Tour, was to link the Nation of 
Islam with the entire Muslim world, that regardless to what happens to me, 
whether I live or die, the Nation of Islam would be tied to Africa, tied to the 
Muslim world, and would more than likely continue. Secondly, if y
ou're going to kill me, if that has been the thought - not necessarily in this 
room, but in other board rooms - then I'm going to raise the price of murder. 
And I'm going to make sure that if you do kill me , you won't live too much 
longer after this. Now how is that going to happen ? It's not g
oing to happen from the five so-called "rouge nations" that I spoke to. I'll 
tell you exactly what counsel was with Gemelial in the writings of Paul. He 
said if this work be of men, don't even worry about it, it will come to naught. 
If it is of God, and God is with this man, and we fig





From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:17:21 EST 1998
Article: 64528 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 98 00:49:19 GMT
Subject: **Who Brought Slaves to America ?******************************
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,soc.culture.african.american,soc.culture.usa
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 661
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.35
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.35
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: jo.randori.com
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!fu-berlin.de!nntp.abs.net!WCG!news.randori.com!205.218.162.35
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64522 alt.discrimination:64528 alt.politics.nationalism.white:90076 alt.politics.white-power:116246 soc.culture.african.american:229633 soc.culture.usa:200707





Blacks and Jews
Quotes and Facts


When assessing the relationship between Blacks and Jews, one need not resort to 
vicious name-calling or opprobrious epithets. One need only to present the 
facts. World Jewry apologizes to no one when they cite historical precedent as 
a guide for their future relationships with any people. The hi
storical record is clearer than the muddled pronouncements of a reactionary and 
controlled media. None of the critics of The Secret Relationship have been able 
to re-write the history showing a history of "friendship" between Blacks and 
Jews. They are forced to succumb to the tragic reality that
 nearly every one of their colonial fathers hated Black people and participated 
in the robbing of their humanity. Those who have felt that there was some 
"special" relationship which carried with it a "special" right to criticize and 
control Black leadership can no longer make such a claim.

The following is a guide for informed analysis. (See also "Open Letter to 
Cornel West" by the African United Front for a litany of issues raised by 
Blacks about Jewish behavior. See also Professor Tony Martin's Broadsides.)


------------------------------------------------------------------------


Home B&J Newspage | Minister Louis Farrakhan and the Jews 

The Most Controversial Books in America

Black Slavery and the Jews | Professor Tony Martin and Wellesley College | 
Facts and Quotes 
Trends in Black/Jewish Affairs | Current Issues | Open Letter to [Uncle Toms] 
Blacks & Jews Historical Bibliography | E-Mail, Letters & Correspondence | Links


------------------------------------------------------------------------




 

Historians



Marc Lee Raphael
Ira Rosenwaike
Cecil Roth
Jacob Rader Marcus, considered the Dean of American Jewish history
Arnold Wiznitzer
Louis Epstein
W.E.B. Dubois
Lester Friedman
Neal Gabler 
Seymour B. Liebman
Herbert I. Bloom 


Robert A. Rockaway 




 

Organizations & Media

The American and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society Report of 1853


The Jewish Record


Anti-Defamation League Charter


B'nai B'rith Magazine

Rob Reiner



 

Rabbis

Moses Maimonides


Elie Wiesel


anonymous


Isaac Mayer Wise, founder of Reform Judaism


Bertram W. Korn, the foremost scholar of nineteenth century Jewish history


Morris Raphael



 

Notables

Andrew Goodman


William Lloyd Garrison


Major Manuel Mordecai Noah


Adolf Hitler



------------------------------------------------------------------------



About Civil Rights



A Rabbi, 1956
"What our friends in the North do not fully appreciate is the fact that there 
is no difference between most of the Jews and their Christian neighbors in 
their attitudes toward the Negro. This is not a by-product of antisemitism, but 
an honest conviction. For these Jews desegregation presents not
 merely a school problem, but also a problem of the mixing of races."


------------------------------------------------------------------------



Black Slavery



Marc Lee Raphael
"Jews also took an active part in the Dutch colonial slave trade; indeed, the 
bylaws of the Recife and Mauricia congregations (1648) included an imposta 
(Jewish tax) of five soldos for each Negro slave a Brazilian Jew purchased from 
the West Indies Company. Slave auctions were postponed if they 
fell on a Jewish holiday. In Curacao in the seventeenth century, as well as in 
the British colonies of Barbados and Jamaica in the eighteenth century, Jewish 
merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, in all the American 
colonies, whether French (Martinique), British, or Dutch, J
ewish merchants frequently dominated.
"This was no less true on the North American mainland, where during the 
eighteenth century Jews participated in the 'triangular trade' that brought 
slaves from Africa to the West Indies and there exchanged them for molasses, 
which in turn was taken to New England and converted into rum for sale 
in Africa. Isaac Da Costa of Charleston in the 1750's, David Franks of 
Philadelphia in the 1760's, and Aaron Lopez of Newport in the late 1760's and 
early 1770's dominated Jewish slave trading on the American continent."

Jews and Judaism in the United States a Documentary History (New York: Behrman 
House, Inc., Pub, 1983), p. 14. Raphael is the editor of American Jewish 
History, the journal of the American Jewish Historical Society at Brandeis 
University in Massachusetts.

------------------------------------------------------------------------


Ira Rosenwaike
"In Charleston, Richmond and Savannah the large majority (over three-fourths) 
of the Jewish households contained one or more slaves; in Baltimore, only one 
out of three households were slaveholding; in New York, one out of 
eighteen....Among the slaveholding households the median number of slaves
 owned ranged from five in Savannah to one in New York." "The Jewish Population 
in 1820," in Abraham J. Karp, ed., The Jewish Experience in America: Selected 
Studies from the Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society 
(Waltham, Massachusetts, 1969, 3 volumes), volume 2, pp. 2, 17, 19


From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:17:22 EST 1998
Article: 64532 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 98 01:30:03 GMT
Subject: ARYAN MUMMIES OF CHINA
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.discrimination,alt.politics.white-power,soc.culture.celtic,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.israel,soc.culture.usa
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 377
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.35
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.35
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: jo.randori.com
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!fu-berlin.de!newsfeed.direct.ca!newsxfer.visi.net!WCG!news.randori.com!205.218.162.35
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.discrimination:64532 alt.politics.white-power:116252 soc.culture.celtic:33109 soc.culture.europe:95306 soc.culture.israel:122900 soc.culture.usa:200718


THE MUMMIES OF XINJIANG

In the dry hills of this central Asian province, archaeologists 
have unearthed more than 100 corpses that are as much as 4,000 
years old, astonishingly well preserved -- and Caucasian.
 
One glimpse of the corpses was enough to shock Victor 
Mair profoundly. In 1987, Mair, a professor of Chinese at 
the University of Pennsylvania, was leading a tour group 
through a museum in the Chinese city of Urumqi, in the 
central Asian province of Xinjiang, when he accidentally 
strayed into gloomy, newly opened room. There, under glass, 
lay the recently discovered corpses of a family - a man, a 
woman, and a child of two or three -- each clad in long, 
dark purple woolen garments and felt boots. "Even today I 
get chills thinking about that first encounter," says Mair. 
"The Chinese said they were 3,000 years old, yet the bodies 
looked as if they were buried yesterday."
 
But the real shock came when Mair looked closely at their 
faces. In contrast to most central Asian peoples,these 
corpses had obvious Caucasian, or European, features - 
blond hair, long noses, deep-set eyes, and long skulls.
"I was thunderstruck," Mair recalls. "Even though I was 
supposed to be leading a tour group, I just couldn't leave 
that room. The questions kept nagging at me: Who were these 
people? How did they get out here at such an early date?"
 
The corpses Mair saw that day were just a few of more 
than 100 dug up by Chinese archeologists over the past 
16 years. All of them are astonishingly well preserved.
They come from four major burial sites scattered between 
the arid foothills of the Tian Shan ("Celestial Mountains") 
in northwest China and the fringes of the the Taklimakan 
Desert, some 150 miles due south. All together, these 
bodies, dating from about 2000 B.C. to 300 B.C., constitute
significant additions to the world's catalog of prehistoric 
mummies. Unlike the roughly contemporaneous mummies of ancient 
Egypt, the Xinjiang mummies were not ruler or nobles; they 
were not interred in pyramids or other such monuments,
nor were they subjected to deliberate mummification procedures. 
They were preserved merely by being buried in the parched, 
stony desert, where daytime temperatures often soar over 
100 degrees. In the heat the bodies were quickly dried, with 
facial hair, skin, and other tissues remaining largely intact.
 
Where exactly did these apparent Caucasians come from? And 
what were they doing at remote desert oases in central Asia?
 
Any answers to these questions will most likely fuel a
wide-ranging debate about the role outsiders played in the 
rise of Chinese civilization. As far back as the second 
century B.C., Chinese texts refer to alien peoples called 
the Yuezhi and the Wusun, who lived on China's far western 
borders; the texts make it clear that these people were 
regarded as troublesome "barbarians." Until recently, 
scholars have tended to downplay evidence of any early 
trade or contact between China and the West, regarding 
the development of Chinese civilization as an essentially 
homegrown affair scaled off from outside influences; indeed, 
this view is still extremely congenial to the present Chinese 
régime. Yet some archaeologists have begun to argue that these 
supposed barbarians might have been responsible for introducing 
into China such basic items as the wheel and the first metal 
objects. Exactly who these central Asian outsiders might have 
been, however -- what language they spoke and where they 
came from -- is a puzzle. No wonder, then, that scholars see 
the discovery of the blond mummies as a sensational new clue.
 
Although Mair was intrigued by the mummies,the political 
climate of the late 1980s (the Tiananmen Square massacre 
occurred in 1989) guaranteed that any approach to Chinese 
archaeological authorities would be fraught with difficulties. 
So he laid the riddle to one side as he returned to his main 
area of study, the translation and analysis of ancient Chinese 
texts. Then, in September 1991, the discovery of the 5,000 feet. 
Photos of the Ice Man's corpse, dried by the wind and then 
buried by a glacier, reminded Mair of the desiccated mummies 
in the Urumqi museum. And he could't help wondering
whether some of the scientific detective methods now being 
applied to the Ice Man, including DNA analysis of the preserved 
issue, could help solve the riddle of Xinjiang.
 
With China having become more receptive to outside scholars, 
Mair decided to launch a collaborative investigation with 
Chinese scientists. He contacted Xinjiang's leading archaeologist, 
Wang Binghua, who had found the first of the mummies in 1978. 
Before Wang's work in the region, evidence of early
settlements was virtually unknown. In the late 1970s, though, 
Wang had begun a systematic search for ancient cites in the 
northeast corner of Xinjiang Province. "He knew that ancient 
peoples would have located their settlements long a stream to 
have a reliable source of water," says Mair. As he followed 
one such stream from its source in the Tian Shan, says Mair, 
"Wang would ask the local inhabitants whether they had ever 
found any broken bowls, wooden artifacts, or the like. Finally 
one older man told him of a place locals called Qizilchoqa, or 
'Red Hillock.'"
 
It was here that the first mummies were unearthed. This 
was also the first site visited last summer by Mair and his 
collaborator, Paolo Francalacci, an anthropological geneticist 
at the University of Sassari in Italy. Reaching Qizilchoqa 
involved a long, arduous drive east from Urumqi. For a day
and a half Mair, Wang, and their colleagues bounced inside 
four-wheel-drive Land Cruisers cross rock-strewn dirt roads 
>from  one oasis to the next. Part of their journey eastward 
followed China's Silk Road, the ancient trade route that 
evolved in the second century B.C. and connected China to 
the  West. Finally they reached the village of Wupu; 
goats scattered as the vehicles edged their way through 
the back streets. Next to the village as a broad green 
ravine, and after the researches had maneuvered their 
way into it, the sandy slope of the Red Hillock 
suddenly became visible.
 
"It wasn't much to look at," Mair recalls, "about 20 
acres on a gentle hill ringed by barbed wire. There's 
a brick work shed where tools are stored and the visiting 
archaeologists sleep. But you could spot the shallow 
depressions in the sand where the graves were." As Mair 
watched, Wang's team began digging up several previously 
excavated corpses that had been reburied for lack of adequate 
storage facilities at the Urumqi museum. Mair didn't have to, 
wait long, just a couple of feet below the sand, the 
archaeologists came across rush matting and wooden logs 
covering a burial chamber with mud bricks. Mair was 
surprised by the appearance of the logs: they looked 
as if they had just been chopped down. Then the first 
mummy emerged from the roughly six-foot-deep pit. For 
Mair the moment was nearly as charged with emotion as 
that first encounter in the museum. "When you're standing 
right next to these bodies, as well preserved as they are, 
you feel a sense of personal closeness to them," he says. 
"It's almost supernatural - you feel that somehow life 
persists even though you're looking at a dried-out corpse."
 
Mair and Francalacci spent the day examining the corpses, 
with Francalacci taking tissue samples to identify the 
genetic origins of the corpses. "He took small samples 
>from  unexposed areas of the bodies,' says Mair, "usually 
>from  the inner thighs or underarms. We also took a few bones, 
usually pieces of rib that were easy to break off, since 
bone tends to preserve the DNA better than muscle tissue 
or skin." Francalacci wore a face mask and rubber gloves 
to avoid contaminating the samples with any skin flakes 
that would contain his own DNA. The samples were placed 
in collection jars, sealed, and labeled; Mair made a 
photographic and written record of the collection.
 
So far 113 graves have been excavated at Qizilchoqa;
probably an equal number remain to be explored. Based 
on carbon-14 dating by the Chinese and on the style 
of painted pots found with the corpses, all the mummies 
here appear to date to around 1200 B.C. Most were 
found on their backs with their knees drawn up - a 
position that allowed the bodies to fit into the small
burial chambers. They are fully clothed in brightly 
colored woolen fabrics, felt and leather boots, and 
sometimes leather coats. The men generally have light 
brown or blond hair, while the women have long braids; 
one girl has blue tattoo marks on her wrist. Besides 
pottery, resting alongside them are simple items 
>from  everyday life: combs made of wood, needles of bone,
spindle whorls for spinning thread, hooks, bells, loaves 
of bread, and other food offerings. The artifacts provide 
further proof that these were not the burial sites of the 
wealthy: had the graves been those of aristocrats, laden 
with precious bronzes, they probably would have been 
robbed long ago.
 
However, Wang and his colleagues have found some 
strange if not aristocratic, objects in the course 
of their investigations in Xinjiang. At a site near 
the town of Subashi 310 miles west of Qizilchoqa, 
that dates to about the fifth century B.C., they 
unearthed a woman wearing a two-foot-long black felt 
peaked hat with a flat brim. Though modern Westeners 
may find it tempting to identify the hat as the 
headgear of a witch, there is evidence that pointed 
hats were widely worn by both women and men in some  
central Asian tribes. For instance, around 520 B.C., 
the Persian king Darius recorded a victory over the 
"Sakas of the pointed hats"; also, in 1970 in Kazakhstan, 
just over China's western border, the grave of a man 
>from  around the same period yielded a two-foot-tall 
conical hat studded with magnificent gold-leaf 
decorations. The Subashi woman's formidable headgear, 
then, might be an ethnic badge or a symbol of prestige 
and influence.
 
Subashi lies a good distance from Qizilchoqa, and 
its site is at least seven centuries younger, yet 
the bodies and their clothing are strikingly similar. 
In addition to the "witch's hat," clothing found there 
included fur coats and leather mittens; the Subashi 
women also held bags containing small knives and herbs, 
probably for use as medicines. A typical Subashi man, 
said by the Chinese team to be at least 55 years old, 
was found lying next to the corpse of a woman in a 
shallow burial chamber. He wore a sheepskin coat, 
felt hat, and long sheepskin boots fastened at the 
crotch with a belt.
 
Another Subashi man has traces of a surgical 
operation on his neck; the incision is sewn up with 
sutures made of horsehair. Mair was particularly 
struck by this discovery because he knew of a Chinese 
text from the third century A.D. describing the life 
of Huatuo, a doctor whose exceptional skills were said 
to have included the extraction and repair of diseased 
organs. The text also claims that before surgery, 
patients drank a mixture of wine and an anesthetizing 
powder that was possibly derived from opium. Huatuo's 
story is all the more remarkable in that the notion 
of surgery was heretical to ancient Chinese medical 
tradition, which taught that good
health depended on the balance and flow of natural 
forces throughout the body. Mair wonders if the Huatuo 
legend might relate to some lost Asian medical tradition 
practiced by the Xinjiang people. One clue is that  
the name Huatuo is uncommon in China and seems close 
to the Sanskrit word for medicine.
 
THE WOOLEN GARMENTS WORN BY THE MUMMIES MAY provide 
some clue to where exactly the Xinjiang people came 
from. A sample of cloth brought back by Mair was 
examined by University of Pennsylvania anthropologist 
Irene Good, a specialist in early Eurasian textiles. 
Examining the cloth under a low-power microscope, she 
saw that the material was not, strictly speaking, wool 
at all. Wool comes from the undercoat of a sheep; this
material appeared  to have been spun from the coarse 
outer hair (called kemp) of a sheep or goat.
Despite the crudeness of the fibers, they were 
carefully dyed green, blue, and brown to make a plaid 
design. They were also woven in a diagonal twill pattern 
that indicated the use of a rather sophisticated loom. 
The overall technique, Good believes, is "characteristically 
European" and, she says, the textile is "the easternmost 
known example of this kind of weaving technique." Similar 
textile fragments, she notes, have been recovered from 
roughly the same time period at sites in Germany, Austria, 
and Scandinavia.
 
Another hint of outside connections struck Mair as he 
roamed across Qizilchoqa. Crossing an unexcavated grave, 
he stumbled upon an exposed piece of wood, which he quickly 
realized had once belonged to a wagon wheel. The wheel was 
made in a simple but distinctive way, by doweling together 
three carved, parallel wooden planks. This style of wheel 
is significant: wagons with nearly identical wheels are 
known from the grassy plains of the Ukraine from as far 
back as 3000 B.C.
 
Most researchers now think the birthplace of horsedrawn 
vehicles and horse riding was in the steppes east and 
west of the Urals rather than in China or the Near East. 
As archaeologist David Anthony and his colleagues have 
shown through microscopic study of ancient horse teeth, 
horses were already being harnessed in the Ukraine 6,000 
years ago. The Ukraine horses, Anthony found, show a 
particular kind of tooth wear identical to that of modern
horses that "fight the bit." The world's earliest 
high-status vehicles also seem to have originated 
in the steppes; recent discoveries of wooden chariots with
elaborate spoked wheels were reported by Anthony to date 
to around 2000 B.C. Chariots do not seem to have appeared 
in China until some 800 years later.
 
A number of artifacts recovered from the Xinjiang 
burials provide important evidence for early horse riding. 
Qizilchoqa yielded a wooden bit and leather reins, a horse 
whip consisting of a single strip of leather attached to a 
wooden handle, and a wooden cheekpiece with leather straps. 
This last object was decorated with an image of the sun that 
was probably religious in nature and that was also found 
tattooed on some of the mummies. And at Subashi, archaeologists 
discovered a padded leather saddle of exquisite workmanship.
 
Could the Xinjiang people have belonged to a mobile, 
horse-riding culture that spread from the plains of 
eastern Europe? Does this explain their European 
appearance? If so, could they have been speaking an 
ancient forerunner of modern European, Indian, and 
ranian languages? Though the idea is highly 
speculative, a number of archaeologists and linguists think
the spread of Indo-European languages may be linked 
to the gradual spread of horse-riding and 
horse-drawn-vehicle technology from its origins 
in Europe 6,000 years ago. The Xinjiang mummies 
may help confirm these speculations.
 
Intriguingly, evidence of a long-extinct language 
belonging to the Indo-European family does exist 
in central Asia. This language, known as Tocharian, 
is recorded in manuscripts from the eighth century 
A.D., and solid evidence for its existence can be 
found as far back as the third century. Tocharian 
inscriptions from this period are also found painted 
in caves in the foothills of the mountain west of 
Urumqi, along with paintings of swash-buckling 
knights wielding long swords. The knights are 
depicted with full red beards and European faces. 
Could the Xinjiang people have been their ancestors, 
speaking an early version of Tocharian? "My guess is 
that they would have been speaking some form of 
Indo-European," comments Don Ringe, a historical 
linguist at the University of Pennsylvania, "but whether 
it was an early form of Tocharian or some other branch 
of the family, such as Indo-Iranian, we may never 
know for sure."
 
Perhaps a highly distinctive language would help 
explain why the Xinjiang people's distinctive appearance 
and culture persisted over so many centuries. Eventually 
they might well have assimilated with the local population
 - the major ethnic group in the area today, the 
Uygur, includes people with unusually fair hair and 
complexions. That possibility will soon be investigated 
when Mair, Francalacci, and their Chinese colleagues 
compare DNA from ancient mummy tissue with blood and 
hair samples from local people. Besides the riddle 
of their identity, there is also the question of  
what these fair-haired people were doing in a remote 
desert oasis. Probably never wealthy enough to own 
chariots, they nevertheless had wagons and
well-tailored clothes. Were they mere goat and 
sheep farmers? Or did they profit from or even 
control prehistoric trade along the route that  
later became the Silk Road? If so, they probably 
helped spread the first wheels and certain 
metalworking skills into China.
 
"Ultimately I think our project may end up having 
tremendous implications for the origins of Chinese 
civilization," Mair reflects. "For all their incredible 
inventiveness, the ancient Chinese weren't cut off 
>from  the rest of the world, and influences didn't just 
flow one way, from China westward.'
 
Unfortunately, economics dictates that answers will 
be slow in coming. The Chinese have little money to spare 
for this work, and Wang and his team continue to 
operate on a shoestring. Currently most of the 
corpses and artifacts are stored in a damp, 
crowded basement room at the Institute of
Archeology in Urumqi, in conditions that 
threaten their continued preservation. If 
Mair's plans for a museum can be financed 
with Western help, perhaps the mummies can be 
moved. Then, finally, they'll receive the study 
and attention that will ultimately unlock 
their secrets.
 

    
    "If, by the instrument of government authority, a Folk are 
being led to their destruction, then rebellion is not only the right 
of every member of such a Folk, it is their duty." - 


         __
        /\_\
       / / /_
      / /_/\ \     Western Imperative Network (WIN)               
     _\ \/  \ \     http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm
    /\ \  /\ \_\
    \ \/  \ \/_/
     \  /\ \_\      National Alliance (Europeans Only)
      \/_/ / /      http://www.natall.com
        / / /
        \/_/
     





From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:17:24 EST 1998
Article: 64556 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 98 07:27:24 GMT
Subject: **JEWISH COMMUNISM= JEWISH MURDER**
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,soc.culture.usa
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 677
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.35
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.35
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: jo.randori.com
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!Supernews73!supernews.com!news.he.net!news-out.netasset.com!news.randori.com!205.218.162.35
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64576 alt.discrimination:64556 soc.culture.usa:200775



© 1997 Michael A. Hoffman II's Campaign for Radical Truth in History

 

The Prop-Masters

Perpetrators of the holocaust against Christian Russia transform themselves 
into "survivors" of a holocaust.

The portraits at left are of the same man but in two different incarnations. On 
the far left we see Martin "Gray" in retirement after a successful career 
peddling fake antiques to gullible collectors. He is holding his mass market 
paperback, For Those I Loved, which is filled with his exploits a
s a saintly "Holocaust Survivor" who was supposedly forced to help clear bodies 
out of the Treblinka "gas chamber." The earlier portrait is of the youthful 
Gray as a highly-decorated officer in the Soviet NKVD (the savage forerunner of 
the KGB), responsible for the murder of millions of Christia
ns in Russia and Eastern Europe. Even Establishment researchers have had to 
admit that Gray's book is as phony as the antiques he peddled. But Gray's scam 
is symbolic of countless other Communist ghouls who have managed to land on 
their feet in the West, disguised as poor, persecuted "Survivors 
of the Holocaust" and feted as the saints and martyrs of the universe. 
Meanwhile the holocaust they perpetrated against millions of Christians slips 
further down the dark environs of Orwell's memory hole.

In chapter 13 of Charles Dickens' Oliver Twist, Dickens notes that the Jew 
Fagin has an inexhaustible supply of props and disguises.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jewish Communists

Copyright ©1997 by Michael A. Hoffman II. [Portions of this report first 
appeared in Mr. Hoffman's book, The Great Holocaust Trial: The Landmark Battle 
for Freedom of Speech. All Rights Reserved This book is banned by the 
government of Canada and is subject to seizure from the Canadian mails by 
Revenue Canada, which then burns the copies it confiscates].

Jewish Professor Arno Mayer of Princeton in his important book, Why Did the 
Heavens Not Darken? states that the German invasion of Russia was carried out 
with the intention to eradicate Bolshevik (Soviet Communist) ideology. The 
Germans were hardly the only ones in the West to believe that, "Sov
iet Russia is a dictatorship of Jewry."

On Feb. 8, 1920 a young British writer made a similar observation in the 
Illustrated Sunday Herald:

"There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism 
and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these 
international and for the most part atheistical Jews."

The writer was Winston Churchill. Though he would later sell his soul for 
considerably more than thirty pieces of silver, his analysis of the authentic 
nature of Soviet communism remains trenchant.

Churchill expressed the crucial insight that the crimes perpetrated by Jewish 
communists against Germans and Russians instilled in those people a desire for 
retribution:

"In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. 
And the prominent, if not indeed, the principal, part in the system of 
terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating 
Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by 
Jewesses.


"The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror 
during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented 
in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to 
prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people.

"...The fact that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish places of worship 
are excepted by the Bolsheviks from their universal hostility has tended more 
and more to associate the Jewish race in Russia with villainies which are now 
being perpetrated...Needless to say, the most intense passions
 of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people."

Chaim Bermant, writing in the Jewish Chronicle (Aug. 30, 1991), says: "It was 
Communism which toppled the hated Czars, Communism which removed Jewish 
disabilities and proscribed anti-Semitism and Communism which, in its early 
days at least, opened the doors to Jewish advancement."

Political analyst Joseph Sobran points out that the revelation of this "ethnic 
component" of Communism contests a cherished historical lie: "...the ethnic 
history of Communism is likely to complicate the conventional 'lachrymose 
version of Jewish history,' according to which Jews are always and 
everywhere innocent victims of Gentile prejudice and persecution."

Lenin, whose maternal grandfather, Israel Blank, was Jewish, said that Jews 
made the best revolutionaries: "The clever Russian is almost always a Jew or 
has Jewish blood in him." (Dmitri Volkogonov, Lenin: A New Biography, p. 112). 
Lenin was both clever and a revolutionary. He was surely referri
ng to himself.

Researcher Wayne McGuire of Harvard University writes: "Lenin was a Jew by the 
standards of Israel's Law of Return: he possessed a Jewish grandparent. It 
would seem that not only was Lenin a Jew, but that he was a Jewish racist and 
chauvinist, although he kept his ideas on this volatile subject 
far in the background, probably because they were in radical conflict with the 
supposed universalism of Marxism. ...Lenin was a Jewish racist who deliberately 
gave Jews especially, the most 'intellectually demanding tasks.' He admitted 
that 50% of the communist terrorist vanguard in the south an
d west of Russia was comprised of Jews."

Lenin declared, "We are exterminating the bourgeoisie as a class." His partner 
in crime, Apfelbaum (Zinoviev) stated: "The interests of the revolution require 
the physical annihilation of the bourgeoisie class." Who were these 
bourgeoisie? Certainly not Jews. Trotsky gave a clue to their identit
y in a 1937 interview in the New York Jewish newspaper, Daily Forward: "The 
longer the rotten bourgeoisie society lives, the more and more barbaric will 
anti-Semitism become everywhere."

Bourgeoisie was a Bolshevik code-word for Gentile. The first law passed after 
the Communists seized power in Russia made anti-semitism a crime punishable by 
death. (Izvestia, July 27, 1918).

The top Communist Jewish official Zinoviev stated: "Without mercy, without 
sparing, we will kill our enemies in scores of hundreds. Let them be thousands; 
let them drown themselves in their own blood. For the blood of Lenin and 
Uritzky, Zinoviev and Vólodarsky, let there be floods of the blood o
f the bourgeoisie--more blood! As much as possible!" (Krasnaya Gazeta, Sept. 1, 
1918).

The Jewish Bolsheviks regarded politics as a branch of Gentile pest control. 
Hatred of Christians, especially the peasant "bourgeoisie" was their prime 
motivation. The systematic destruction of the Christian peasantry of Russia as 
so many vermin, beginning with Lenin's attack on them in the summ
er of 1918 and his forced starvation in 1921, has been almost completely 
ignored in Western history.

The Siberian novelist Valentin Rasputin wrote in 1990: "I think today the Jews 
here in Russia should feel responsible for the sin of having carried out the 
revolution and for the shape it took. They should feel responsible for the 
terror--for the terror that existed during the revolution and esp
ecially after the revolution...their guilt is great. They perpetrated the 
relentless campaign against the peasant class whose land was brutally 
expropriated by the state and who themselves were ruthlessly murdered."

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's biographer recounts what it was like to grow up as a 
Russian Christian child among the children of the Jewish communist elite: "By 
the age of ten he had the cross ripped from his neck by jeering Pioneers and 
for over a year was held up to ridicule... Solzhenitsyn was, as
 a boy, exposed to students whose parents had an officially superior status. 
Most of the members of the Young Pioneers and Komsomol movements, at least in 
Rostov, were Jewish children..." (Michael Scammell, Solzhenitsyn: A Biography, 
p. 64).

Here is the most genocidal political movement in world history, which created 
the largest concentration camps and the most horrendous slave labor system of 
the 20th century, in which millions of Christians were slaughtered (on the size 
of the Gulag concentration camp system cf. C. Andrew and O. 
Gordievsky, KGB: The Inside Story and N.Y. Times, Oct. 22, 1990, p. 82. None of 
these camps are being preserved for posterity. Most were destroyed long ago by 
special military brigades; cf. Michael Specter, "Cold Reminder," N.Y. Times, 
Dec. 3, 1994).

This was a movement staffed in its upper echelons by Jewish Communists and yet 
the world is comparatively silent about the holocaust and war crimes this 
thoroughly kosher system inflicted and the identity of the persons who were its 
architects.

Auschwitz is on the tip of every tongue but who has heard of Kolyma, Magadan, 
the Solovetsky islands and the other infernal Soviet centers of human 
destruction in eastern Siberia? Who has seen films and books about the millions 
of human beings worked, frozen and starved to death in the construct
ion of the White Sea-Baltic Canal, over which stood a triumphant, colossal 
statue of the Jewish communist mass murderer Genrikh Yagoda?

The Jewish-communist epoch of mass murder has disappeared into history in one 
of the great vanishing acts of all time. Only practiced deceivers, with all the 
sleight of hand of the most accomplished stage magicians, could pull off such a 
coup against the rest of humanity. To trick mankind into f
ocusing nearly all expiatory sentiment, monuments and commemoration on Jewish 
victims and brand the Mark of Cain--the very words war crime and holocaust 
itself--on Germany and upon Germans alone as their proprietary trademark, must 
be regarded as one of the most masterful achievements of psychol
ogical warfare in the annals of illusion.

Jewish power in the West today has expanded commensurate with the expansion of 
"Holocaust" propaganda, as noted by the Israeli author Moshe Leshem: "Israelis 
and American Jews fully agree that the memory of the Holocaust is an 
indispensable weapon--one that must be used relentlessly against thei
r common enemy...Jewish organizations and individuals thus labor continuously 
to remind the world of it. In America, the perpetuation of the Holocaust memory 
is now a $100-million-a-year enterprise, part of which is government-funded." ( 
Balaam's Curse, p. 228)

This is why Edgar Bronfman, the billionaire Canadian Seagram's whiskey merchant 
and chairman of the powerful World Jewish Congress says, "The growing numbers 
of revisionist supporters cannot be ignored. We must use every resource to stop 
revisionism now, before it's too late."

The reason it must be stopped is because revisionism is the only force 
preventing the holy people from finishing the job they started in Russia and 
Bavaria, only this time they are using intellectual means to achieve the same 
end.

Consider the fact that the people who bear the brunt of contemporary Jewish 
racist hatred and invective, the Germans, have among the lowest birthrates and 
the highest abortion rates of any nation in the world. Far more Germans die 
every year than are born.

The self-hating Germans are not the only targets of corrosive gas chamber 
guilt, however. Organized Christianity (more accurately called Churchianity) 
nowadays is little more than one huge turkey flock, truckling, toadying and 
crawling in search of Jewish sanctification and approbation. Their sa
vior called the Jewish leadership of his time, "the children of hell" (Matthew 
23:15) but those who presume to speak in His name today, call them the saints 
and sages of the cosmos.

Only in such a profoundly falsified world soaked in fraud could the 
international media sit by, uninterested, as the great-great grandson of the 
blood-drenched Jewish Red Army commander Leon Trotsky, David Axelrod, shot to 
death an elderly Palestinian couple in November of 1990, as part of an Is
raeli, "Kach" terror group raid.

But imagine--if you can--the hubbub if a grandson of a Nazi war criminal had 
shot a Turkish couple in Germany. The weeping, wailing and never-ending 
references to "Never Forget" and "lessons of history" would seep out of the 
collective TV sets of the earth like waste from a toxic septic tank, be
cause what is clear from such a double standard is that the true lessons of 
history are not being learned and recollection itself is hostage to the diorama 
of Zionist monomania.

Sixteen million ethnic Germans were forcibly expelled from Silesia, Moravia and 
the Volga regions of the eastern territories at the end of the Second World 
War. On this trail of tears, two million perished--shot to death, starved, 
raped and beaten. Ask one in one thousand, one in ten thousand pe
ople on the street today-- "Have you heard?" The answer will be no.

The Steven Spielberg movie images of cattle cars jammed with human cargo are 
reserved for Jewish victims alone. The 800,000 mostly Muslim Chechens deported 
by Jewish commissars and savagely stuffed into railway cars to Kazakhstan, 
where a quarter of a million died enroute, do not meet Hollywood'
s standard of cinematic focus.

The Soviet cattle car deportations afflicted more than a half-million Estonian, 
Latvian and Lithuanian Christians who were shipped to the Gulag. 12% of the 
entire Baltic population was either deported to Siberia or executed by the 
Jewish Soviet Secret Police. Who knows of it? Who cares? Who trie
s to keep this history from repeating? Instead, in 1995 the president of 
Lithuania made a pilgrimage to the Israeli gas chamber shrine at Yad Vashem to 
grovel and beg "forgiveness" for his people who were the victims of the Jewish 
Communist murderers. To seek forgiveness in all humility is ordai
ned when it is predicated on the truth. To do so based on false witness in 
order to idolize the Pharisees is a mockery of justice.

In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the membership of the Soviet communist 
party was Jewish, though Jews comprised only 1.8 percent of the total 
population (Stuart Kahan, The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)

The following is a list of some top Jewish Communist murderers, commissars, 
spies, assassins and propagandists (aliases are listed in parentheses). This 
list is by no means comprehensive. To catalog all of the Jewish communists 
involved in crimes would require hundreds of pages.

Jewish Communists

V.I. Lenin, supreme dictator. Leon Bronstein (Trotsky): supreme commander of 
the Soviet Red Army. Grigory Apfelbaum (Zinoviev): executive, Soviet Secret 
Police. Solomon Lozovsky: deputy Soviet foreign minister. Maxim Wallach 
(Litvinov): Soviet foreign minister. Yuri Andropov: director, Soviet KG
B, later supreme dictator of the Soviet Union.

Jacob Sverdlov: first president of the Soviet Union. Sverdlov ordered the 
massacre of the Czar's family--women and children--in the town named after 
Catherine the Great, Yekaterinburg, (renamed Sverdlovsk in 1924 in honor of the 
murderer).

Jacob Yurovsky: commander, Soviet Secret Police. Yurovsky led the death squad 
which carried out Sverdlov's order for the murder of the Czar's family, 
including the bayoneting to death of the Czar's daughters. The Ipatyev house, 
where, in the basement, the massacre had occurred, stood intact unti
l 1977, when the local Communist party boss at that time, Boris Yeltsin, 
ordered it demolished, lest it become a shrine to anti-Jewish sentiment.



Lazar Moiseyevich Kaganovich (pictured at left): chief mass murderer for 
Stalin, ordered the deaths of millions and the wholesale destruction of 
Christian monuments and churches, including the great Cathedral of Christ the 
Savior. Standing amid the rubble of the cathedral, Kaganovich proclaimed,
 "Mother Russia is cast down. We have ripped away her skirts." (N.Y. Times, 
Sept. 26, 1995).

Mikhail Kaganovich: deputy commissar of heavy industry, supervisor of slave 
labor, brother of Lazar. Rosa Kaganovich: Stalin's mistress; sister of Lazar. 
Paulina Zhemchuzina: member of the Central Committee and wife of Soviet Foreign 
Minister Molotov. Olga Bronstein: officer, Soviet Cheka Secret
 Police, sister of Trotsky, wife of Kamenev.

Genrikh Yagoda: chief of Soviet Secret Police, mass murderer extraordinaire. 
(Jewish poet Romain Rolland, winner of the Nobel Prize, wrote a hymn of praise 
to Yagoda).

Matvei Berman and Naftaly Frenkel: founders, the Gulag death camp system.

Lev Inzhir, commissar for Soviet death camp transit and administration. Boris 
Berman: executive officer of the Soviet Secret Police and brother of Matvei. 
K.V. Pauker: chief of operations, Soviet NKVD Secret Police.

Firin, Rappoport, Kogan, Zhuk: commissars of death camps and slave labor, 
supervised the mass deaths of laborers during the construction of the White 
Sea--Baltic Canal.

M.I. Gay: commander, Soviet Secret Police. Slutsky and Shpiegelglas: 
commanders, Soviet Secret Police. Isaac Babel: officer, Soviet Secret Police.

Leiba Lazarevich Feldbin (Aleksandr Orlov): commander, Soviet Red Army; 
officer, Soviet Secret Police. Feldbin was chief of Soviet Security in the 
Spanish Civil War. He supervised the massacre of Catholic priests and peasants 
in Spain.

Yona Yakir: general, Soviet Red Army, member of the Central Committee. Dimitri 
Shmidt: general, Soviet Red Army. Yakov ("Yankel") Kreiser: general, Soviet Red 
Army. Miron Vovsi: general, Soviet Red Army.

David Dragonsky: general, Soviet Red Army, Hero of the Soviet Union. Grigori 
Shtern: general, Soviet Red Army. Mikhail Chazkelevich: general, Soviet Red 
Army. Shimon Kirvoshein: general, Soviet Red Army. Arseni Raskin: 
deputy-commander, Soviet Red Army. Haim Fomin, commander of Brest-Litovsk, So
viet Red Army. At least one hundred Soviet generals were Jewish (cf. Canadian 
Jewish News, April 19, 1989).

Generals who were not themselves Jewish often had Jewish wives. Among these 
were Marshal Voroshilov, Marshal Bulganin, Marshal Peresypkin and General Pavel 
Sudoplatov (Sudoplatov assassinated hundreds of Christian leaders including 
Ukranian Catholic Archbishop Teodor Romzha). This Jewish wife "i
nsurance policy" extended to Politburo members such as Andrei Andreyev and 
Leonoid Brezhnev.

Sergei Eisenstein: director of communist propaganda films which depicted 
Christian peasants (kulaks) as hideous, money-grabbing parasites. The kulaks 
were subsequently massacred. (Cf. for example Eisenstein's Bezhin Meadow).

KOMZET: commission for the settlement of Jewish Communists on land seized from 
murdered Christians in Ukraine; funded by Jewish-American financier Julius 
Rosenwald. 

Ilya Ehrenburg, Minister of Soviet Propaganda and disseminator of anti-German 
hate material dating from the 1930s. Ehrenburg instigated the Soviet Red Army 
rape and murder of German civilians. Referring to German women, Ehrenburg 
gloated to the advancing Red Army troops, "that blonde hag is in f
or a bad time."

In a leaflet addressed to Soviet troops, Ehrenburg wrote: "...the Germans are 
not human beings...nothing gives us so much joy as German corpses." (Anatol 
Goldberg, Ilya Ehrenburg, p. 197). Goldberg concedes that Ehrenburg, "...had 
always disliked the Germans...now that there was a war on he turn
ed his old prejudice into an asset." (Ibid., p. 193).

Another publication distributed to the Red Army, this time as the 
soldiers approached Danzig, was described by a historian: "Millions of leaflets 
were air-dropped on the troops with a message composed by the propagandist Ilya 
Ehrenburg and signed by Stalin: 'Soldiers of the Red Army! Ki
ll the Germans! Kill all Germans! Kill! Kill! Kill!" (Christopher Duffy, Red 
Storm on the Reich).

The Soviet leadership acknowledged that Ehrenburg sought the extermination of 
the entire German people (cf. Pravda, April 14, 1945. [Pravda was also 
published in a Yiddish edition, Einikeyt). Ehrenburg won the Order of Lenin and 
the Stalin Prize. He willed his papers to the Israeli Yad Vashem 'H
olocaust' Museum.

Solomon Mikhoels: commissar of Soviet propaganda. Soviet film propagandists: 
Mark Donsky, Leonid Lukov, Yuli Reisman, Vasily Grossman,Yevgeny Gabrilovich, 
Boris Volchok and Lillian Hellman (old movies written by her continue to be 
broadcast on American telelvision).

Soviet propagandist: Yevgeny Khaldei who staged the photo of the raising of the 
hammer and sickle flag over the Reichstag in Berlin, May 2, 1945. Afterward, a 
special plane was waiting to fly Khaldei, Stalin's top Tass photographer, to a 
Moscow lab, where his photo was further doctored (loot dis
played on one of the Soviet soldier's wrists was removed in the negative and 
Khaldei added clouds and smoke to the scene for dramatic effect (see photo of 
Khaldei and his beloved flag at left). Khaldei continued to work as a premier 
Soviet propagandist until his retirement from Pravda in 1972. H
is Communist propaganda is proudly on display at the Jewish Museum of New York 
and the Jewish Museum of San Francisco. N.Y. Times writer Vicki Goldberg 
exulted in the raising of the blood-drenched Soviet flag, emblem of the 
slaughter of millions of peasants and Christians; describing it as, "...
a national (and worldwide) symbol of triumph, justice and revenge." (Jan. 31, 
1997, p. B-26).

Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee (JAC): new form of the Bolshevik YEVKOM, Stalin's 
recruiting conduit for funding money, supplies and political influence for 
Soviet Russia from world Jewry as well as the dissemination of gas chamber 
atrocity propaganda (cf. The Black Book).

Nikolai Bukharin: Lenin's chief theorist. Samuel Agursky: commissar. Karl 
Radek: member, Central Committee. Mikhail Gruzenberg (Borodin) commissar. A.A. 
Yoffe: commissar. David Ryazanov: advisor to Lenin. Lev Grigorievich Levin: 
physician, poisoner of Stalin's enemies. Lev Rosenfeld (Kamenev): m
ember of the Central Committee.

Ivan Maisky: Soviet Ambassador to Britain. Itzik Solomonovich Feffer: 
commissar, Soviet Secret Police. Abraham Sutskever: Soviet terrorist-partisan. 
Mark Osipovich Reizen: Soviet propagandist, winner of three Stalin Prizes. Lev 
Leopold Trepper: Soviet espionage officer.

Bela Kun (Kohen): supreme dictator of Hungary in 1919. Kun was later Stalin's 
chief terrorist in the Crimea. Kun's eventual successor was Matyas Rakosi, 
Jewish Communist mass murderer of Christians in Hungary. According to the 
Jewish Telegraph Agency of May 14, 1997, Jews "...played key roles in
 ushering Communist rule into Hungary. In fact, during the brutal oppression of 
the early 1950s, the regime's top five leaders were Jews. "

Zakharovich Mekhlis: top executioner for Stalin. Henrykas Zimanas: leader of 
Lithuanian communist terrorists, butcher of Christians.

Moshe Pijade (sometimes spelled Piade): commander, Yugoslav Communist People's 
Army. Tito's top butcher of hundreds of thousands of Croatian Christians. 
Pijade later served as president of the Yugoslav Communist Parliament. At least 
eighteen generals in the Yugoslav Communist People's Army were 
Jewish. The Yugoslavian communist party sent massive arms shipments to Jewish 
fighters in Palestine in the 1940s.

In post-war Poland that nation was completely dominated by Jewish 
communists: the torturer Jacek Rozanski, head of the Secret Police; the 
Politboro commander Jacob Berman (pictured at right)

and commissars Minc, Specht (Olszewski) and Spychalski. These men murdered or 
deported to Kolyma and the other Arctic death camps, tens of thousands of 
Catholic Poles.

According to Jewish researcher John Sack, "In 1945 many Poles felt (and not 
without reason) that Jews ran the Office of State Security...the chief of the 
Office was Jacob Berman, a Jew, and all or almost all the department heads were 
Jews." Sack reports that 75% of the officers of the Communist 
Secret Police in Silesia were Jews. He noted that many Jews in the Communist 
terror apparatus in Poland changed their names to Polish ones like General 
Romkowski, Colonel Rozanski, Capt. Studencki and Lt. Jurkowski. (cf. John Sack, 
The New Republic, Feb. 14, 1994, p. 6. Sack in this article also
 refutes some shoddy research performed by Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, author of 
Hitler's Willing Executioners, who, in the double standard typical of the 
Jewish mentality, refuses to accept the proven fact that Jews ran the Polish 
Communist secret police even as Goldhagen asserts the racist myth th
at the entire German nation was guilty of genocide. Sack does a good job of 
proving Goldhagen wrong about Poland).

In Poland, "...a disproportionate number of Communists were Jews. In 1930, at 
its peak, 35% of the members of the party were Jewish. In Communist youth 
organizations, Jewish membership was even higher, while Communists of Jewish 
origin occupied most of the seats on the central committee. Communi
sm appealed to some Jews because it opposed anti-Semitism more vigorously than 
any other Polish party...Jewish Communists reached their apogee in the years 
immediately after World War Two, when the party leadership was totally in the 
hands of the prewar Communist leadership that abhorred anti-Se
mitism." (Sheldon Kirshner, The Canadian Jewish News, Nov. 5, 1992, p. 16).

Of course when one encounters the issue of Jews, Communists and Catholics in 
Poland in the Establishment media or universities today, the mass murder of the 
Polish Catholics at the hands of the Jewish Communists, is never raised. 
Instead, a minor attack on Jews by Polish peasants enraged at the 
role of Jews in Communist terror, which occurred in July, 1946 at Kielce and 
which has come to be called the "Kielce pogrom" will be the centerpiece of the 
"discussion. " The motivation for the attack is not usually mentioned. Rather, 
the Catholic peasantry are painted in terms of "fiendish bigo
ts" whose "blind, irrational hate" for the "poor, persecuted Jews" resulted in 
"yet another martyrdom of God's Chosen."

But the Catholic Primate of Poland at the time, Cardinal Hlond, a brave prelate 
in a stalwart tradition of Christian resistance to Jewish tyranny in Poland, so 
different from the traitorous philo-Judaism of the current Pontiff, stated that 
the attack in Kielce occurred because of resentment 'due
 to the Jews who today occupy leading positions in Poland's (Communist) 
government and endeavor to introduce a governmental structure that the majority 
of Poles do not wish to have." (Ibid., Kirshner).

As Piotr S. Wandycz of Yale University observes, "The average Pole could not 
but notice in the Stalinist era that the two most powerful men in the 
country--Berman and Minc--were both Jewish as was the dreaded security official 
Rozanski." (N.Y. Review of Books, Aug. 18, 1983, p. 51).

With this record it is interesting to note that the Polish occupant of the 
papacy, John Paul II, consistently lent his prestige and his presence to 
canonizations and commemorations of politically correct victims of the Nazis. 
Nowhere did this Pope breath a word about the openly Jewish, Communist
 massacres of Polish Catholics, Spanish Catholics, Croatian Catholics, 
Lithuanian Catholics--he was too busy, intoning the Shoah, referring to the 
heirs of the Pharisees as "our Elder Brothers in the Faith" giving official 
recognition to an Israeli state which even many orthodox, Haredi rabbis r
egard as a blasphemous and abominable entity, and attacking the German people 
as "the image of the beast."



Solomon Morel (pictured at left): commandant of a post-war Communist 
concentration camp for Germans in Poland. Stalin deliberately put Jews in 
charge of such camps. Morel tortured and murdered thousands of Germans, 
sometimes with his bare hands (cf. "The Wrath of Solomon," Village Voice, March 
3
0, 1993 and John Sack, An Eye for an Eye). Morel is comfortably esconsed in Tel 
Aviv. German survivors of Morel's camp have demanded he be tried as a war 
criminal, but for the Establishment media and the phony, partisan, "human 
rights" groups, bringing Morel to justice is simply a non-issue. Aft
er all, he murdered helpless Germans, so what's the problem?

Julius Hammer, M.D.: New York abortionist and co-founder of the American 
communist party. Armand Hammer: fundraiser and financier for Lenin and Stalin, 
son of Julius.

Lev Davidovich Landau: Stalinist physicist, co-father of the Soviet atomic 
bomb. Klaus Fuchs: helped steal atomic bomb secrets for Stalin. Ruth Werner: 
colonel, Red Army GRU intelligence, assisted Fuchs. Julius and Ethel Rosenberg: 
stole American atomic bomb secrets for Stalin. Morris Cohen (Pet
er Kroger): assisted the Rosenbergs. Markus Wolf: chief of German Communist 
Stasi Secret Police.

Howard Fast: American communist propagandist for Stalin. David 
Dubinsky: Stalin's ally, head of the U.S. International Ladies Garment Workers 
Union. Nahum Goldmann: founder, World Jewish Congress, communist propagandist. 
Rabbi Moses Rosen: agent, Romanian communist party. Victor Rothschild: top 
British espionage agent for Stalin.

Mark Zborowski: "...considered by historians of Soviet terror operations to 
have been the most fearsome...(Soviet) spy of all time" (Stephen Schwartz, 
Forward, Jan. 26, 1996). Zborowski, a medical researcher, murdered a dissident 
with a poisoned orange at the Soviet-run hospital in Paris. Zborow
ski was implicated in several other assassinations in 1936 and 1937. In the 
1940s worked for both the American Jewish Committee and the KGB. In the 1960s 
Zborowski worked as a medical researcher at Mount Zion Hospital in San 
Francisco. He trained numerous psychiatrists and medical specialists in
 the Bay Area. He died in 1990 (cf. "The Strange Case of Doctor Zborowski and 
Monsieur Etienne" by Philippe Videlier, in Le Monde Diplomatique, Dec. 1992).

On Oct. 16, 1948, 50,000 Jewish communists turned out in Moscow's Red Square to 
welcome the first Israeli delegation to Moscow. Stalin supported Zionism's 1947 
Palestine partition plan, gave crucial recognition to the newly-created state 
of Israel and voted for Israel's admission to the United N
ations.

In 1951 communist and Marxist parties had twenty-three seats in the Israeli 
Knesset. The kibbutz system was the most powerful movement in the country and 
the most powerful kibbutz leaders were nearly all Marxists. The biggest Israeli 
holiday was May Day, celebrated with rallies, marches, red ban
ners and red songs.

As recently as 1987 the Israelis were providing the KGB with American 
intelligence secrets (cf. UPI dispatch by Richard Sale, Dec. 13, 1987 and The 
City Paper [Washington, DC], Jan. 15, 1988). Jonathan Jay Pollard was part of 
one such spy ring. British traitor and Communist spy Kim Philby was as
sisted in obtaining safe haven in the Soviet Union by the Israeli Mossad (cf. 
Sunday Telegraph [England], April 16, 1989). This was most appropriate since 
Philby's KGB handler in Moscow was also Jewish.

Romania's communist regime received favorable trade deals from the U.S. for 
years due to Israeli pressure on Congress in its behalf (N.Y. Times, Jan. 18, 
1992, p. 23). The notion that the Zionist Jewish movement was anti-communist is 
a fallacy. The truth is more complex. There was a left wing an
d a right wing within Zionism. The rightists, like the terrorists Jabotinsky 
and Stern, took a fascist approach. Leftist Zionists like David "I am a 
Bolshevik" Ben-Gurion admired the Soviet model of Jewish power and sought to 
incorporate it as the political economy of the Israeli state.

"National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs 
characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an extreme form 
of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of cannibalism...under USSR 
law active anti-Semites are liable to the death penalty." (Stali
n, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).

The African National Congress (ANC) in South Africa was guided by two Communist 
Jews, Albie Sachs, "one of its foremost intellectuals"( London Sunday Times, 
Aug. 29, 1993) and Yossel Mashel Slovo (Joe Slovo).

Slovo was born in a shtetl in Lithuania and grew up speaking Yiddish and 
studying the Talmud. He joined the ANC's terrorist wing, the Umkhonto we Sizwe, 
in 1961 and eventually became its commander. He was named Secretary General of 
the South African Communist Party in 1986. ("Joe Slovo," Jewish 
Chronicle, Jan. 13, 1995).

Slovo had been the " planner of many of the ANC terrorist attacks, including 
the 1983 car bomb that killed 19 people and injured many others... Slovo, who 
had traveled to the Soviet Union many times, was awarded a Soviet medal on his 
60th birthday...Slovo is a dedicated Communist, a Marxist Leni
nist without morality of any kind, for whom only victory counts, whatever the 
human cost, whatever the bloodshed...Slovo disputes little of his image as 'the 
Communist mastermind' behind the ANC's armed struggle. For him the fears of 
South Africa's whites are both a measure of the ANC's growing 
strength and a crucial factor in hastening what he believes will be its 
ultimate victory. 'Revolutionary violence has created the inspirational impact 
that we had intended, and it has won for the ANC its leading position,' Slovo 
said." ("Rebel Strategist Seeks to End Apartheid," L.A. Times, Aug.
 16, 1987, p. 14). When Nelson Mandela's ANC took over South Africa, Slovo was 
named Minister of Housing.



 

Nelson Mandela and Joe Slovo give the clenched fist salute in front of the 
blood-drenched Hammer and Sickle flag of Jewish Bolshevism.

 

Slovo, a Yiddish-speaking Lithuanian Jew, was Secretary General of the South 
African Communist Party and director of the military wing of the ANC, which 
perpetrated numerous terror bombings against white civilians.

 

Mandela was hailed as a great statesman by Britain's Queen Elizabeth II in her 
1996 Christmas message to the realm.

 

When we look at these gruesome personalities, who are only the tip of the 
Jewish iceberg that was Soviet Communism and who were responsible for the 
deaths of upwards of thirty million people; when we realize how little is 
written or filmed about their crimes, we begin to realize that the exclusi
ve focus on the crimes of the Germans, real and imagined, is a function of 
propaganda.

If the facts about the Jewish Communist holocaust against the peasants and 
Christians of Russia and Eastern Europe were given massive publicity, the 
supposed "special evil" of the Germans would stand exposed as a racist fraud.

German actions during World War Two must be viewed in a vacuum in order for the 
New World Order to advance its covert objective of Jewish supremacy.

When Nazi actions are placed within the context of Jewish Communism's 
abominable crimes against the Christian people of Russia and Eastern Europe, 
the public will begin to understand that Hitler and the Nazis were a reaction, 
however unbalanced and excessive, to the Jewish Communist genocide aga
inst millions of Christians and peasants in the East.

This is why the crucial facts about Jewish Communism must never be documented 
in Hollywood films, discussed in university courses or pictured in contemporary 
news magazines. This is why Malcolm Muggeridge's book, an eyewitness account of 
the Jewish Communist holocaust against Christians, Winter 
in Moscow, has been tightly suppressed.

In the Sunday Telegraph (London, England: Nov. 18, 1990) the question is asked, 
"Why then has it (Winter in Moscow) never been republished? The answer may lie 
in Muggeridge's handling of what was then called the 'Jewish 
question.'...Winter in Moscow is acutely concerned with Jews...It was of cou
rse the case that a very disproportionate number of the early Bolsheviks were 
Jews and thus of commissars and apparatchiki..."

The Campaign for Radical Truth in History's documentation of these forbiden 
facts constitutes the chief motivation for the suppression attempts of such 
Stalinist censorship groups as the A.D.L. and Simon Wiesenthal Center. Both of 
these organizations would, if they could, have this writer jailed
 for publishing the documentation herein in Germany, France, or Austria. They 
regularly supply "intelligence files" to those governments on pro-Christian and 
pro-German writers. In 1995 the ADL sought to assist the prosecution of 69 year 
old American writer Hans Schmidt who was imprisoned in Ger
many for publishing a newsletter in Florida. These Jewish censors would like to 
have similar laws passed worldwide, resulting in the jailing of more writers 
and researchers who will not toe the party line or worship the Golden Calf.

To give the other side of history, the revisionist side--to give voice to the 
voiceless millions of dead victims of Jewish Communism--is regarded as 
"hateful" by the vain Zionists who demand for themselves the right to vomit 
forth a daily barrage of sewage upon the sacred memory of our grandpare
nts and ancestors. To defend against the dishonoring of our heritage and our 
ancestors, is surely not hate; it is the right of self-defense against 
psychological warfare.

©1995 and 1996 by Michael A. Hoffman II http://www.hoffman-info.com

All Rights Reserved. See Copyright terms on our home page.

Your donation = our financial survival. Keep Michael A. Hoffman II's research 
coming! Donate today: P.O. Box 849,Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 U.S.A.


------------------------------------------------------------------------


wwii revisionism / bookstore / news bureau /

research archives / home





From lambert@morgan.net Tue Feb 17 19:17:24 EST 1998
Article: 64559 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 98 00:55:06 GMT
Subject: Bill Clinton's Secret RACE Iniative
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,soc.culture.usa,triangle.politics
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 185
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.35
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.35
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: jo.randori.com
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!newsfeed.sollentuna.se!Cabal.CESspool!bofh.vszbr.cz!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!darla.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!WCG!news.randori.com!205.218.162.35
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64582 alt.discrimination:64559 alt.politics.nationalism.white:90102 alt.politics.white-power:116295 soc.culture.usa:200782 triangle.politics:29391


(courtesy of a few Black Nationalists ! Thank you>

Clinton's Initiative on Race is Actually The Trial of Minister Farrakhan 

President Clinton's Initiative on Race has been presented as a serious effort 
to address America's intractable problem of race, but the form that the 
Initiative has taken and the circumstances of its birth raises suspicions about 
the Initiative's actual purpose. We will suggest that the Initiati
ve is a front for anti-Black Jewish interests and its real focus is to severely 
restrict Black progress and to outlaw the Nation of Islam.

What is immediately suspicious to ardent observers is that the eight-member 
appointed advisory board to the Initiative has no Jews on it and the 40 pages 
of material presented as background by the White House makes little mention of 
Jews or "anti-Semitism" (Clinton speaks of "resurgent anti-Semi
tism even on some college campuses"). This raises an interesting point: The 
Jews have been involved in every attempt to deal with "race issues" in the last 
90 years. They ran the Civil Rights Movement; they played major roles in the 
1963 March on Washington and its subsequent 10-year, 20-year, a
nd 30-year anniversary marches; they have meddled endlessly in NAACP and Urban 
League affairs, directing leadership decisions and financial affairs; their 
presence has been imposed upon Black race equity efforts without apology. Now 
that the President of the United States of America has pledged 
the power of his office to grapple with the race issue, the Jews have 
suspiciously chosen to absent themselves.

This decision must be by choice. The ADL's Abraham Foxman was just re-appointed 
by the President to the Holocaust Commission and the ADL's press releases 
uncritically applaud Clinton's every move. At least a third of Clinton's 
cabinet officers are Jews and it has been estimated that nearly 50% o
f their staffs are Jewish. Additionally, more than a third (it is estimated) of 
the now infamous "sleep-over guests" at the White House under the Clinton 
administration were Jewish. It is unlikely, therefore, that Jews were 
uninvolved or overlooked in this "Race Initiative."

President Clinton himself has no reason to raise the race issue in his 
lame-duck position with a strong economy and relative peace in the land. It is 
hard to imagine why he would raise a contentious issue like this (or why his 
Jews would ALLOW him to raise it) especially when White people have e
verything to lose. Any result HAS to accrue to the suffering Black masseswhich 
would do nothing but infuriate White people against Blacks and their "friends," 
the Jews. This makes no sense, strategically.

The American Jewish Committee, the American Jewish Congress and the ADL have 
said NOTHING on the subject of this initiative even though such reticence to 
comment on this issue is unknown to 20th century observers. Such initiatives 
have always generated at least an encouraging, if mild, recogniti
on of the effort on the part of these Jewish organizations in the past. 
Typically, they would "hope" that the Initiative addresses all race hatred 
including "anti-Semitism" and point special attention towards the "hatemongers" 
and bigots "of all races." But there is atypical silence on this too.
 An investigation of this silence leads us to some curious coincidences.

President Clinton, according to his releases, seeks a national dialogue on race 
that will culminate in "legislation" to address the race issue. But what 
legislation is needed? If the Constitution were enforced, the "race issue" 
would be solved. Just a couple of years ago Clinton ignored a call b
y six Congresspeople to revisit the Kerner Commision's study on racism. It was 
suggested at the time that the potential voter backlash from White male made 
adderessing the race issue too risky.

Jewish Interests, Black Demise

We are suggesting that the legislation has already been written by Jewish 
interests for their own purposes and that the national dialogue is a farcical 
attempt (in conjunction with the media) to rubber stamp the Jewish attempt to 
outlaw the Nation of Islam and to severely restrict Black and Whit
e "extremists" with legal sanctions. The Jewish organizations have scapegoated 
the Nation of Islam and Min. Farrakhan with an intense "passion" that avoids 
confronting the real anti-Semites, while generating enough fear to keep the 
donations flowing. With ALL of their efforts having failed to "s
top" the NOI and Min. Farrakhan, they now are turning to Executive power to 
accomplish the task.

The laws which we can assume are prepared to be imposed in America through this 
Initiative will be similar to the "hate laws" in Canada that have been used to 
persecute the "Holocaust Revisionists" and which have already been used to ban 
the Nation of Islam's The Secret Relationship Between Blac
ks and Jews and The Jewish Onslaught by Prof. Tony Martin. The model for these 
laws, according to the Canadian Department of Justice "in large part, [is that] 
proposed by the Anti-Defamation League." According to the ADL, "Presently, 
almost every state in the nation has some form of hate crimes 
legislation. More than one-half of these states have enacted laws based on, or 
similar to, ADL's model hate crimes statute."

The ADL is absent from Clinton's Race Initiative because, as a summary 
investigation will show, they are waiting for another event that has garnered 
little attention Clinton's White House Conference on Hate Crimes. A June 7, 
1997 ADL press release (the same day of Clinton's radio address on the 
subject) entitled "ADL APPLAUDS PRESIDENT FOR `ALL-OUT ASSAULT ON HATE CRIMES'" 
"welcomes" President Clinton's leadership "in convening a special White House 
conference on the subject." According to the press release, "by mobilizing the 
vast resources of the Federal government to undertake a tho
rough review of existing laws to develop a coordinated strategy to address the 
problem of hate crimes, President Clinton has demonstrated that he is prepared 
to go the extra mile to deter and counter such crimes, we stand ready to 
contribute our resources and expertise to assist in this effort."
 (emphasis ours) The conference is scheduled for November 10th, just days after 
the 1997 Day of Atonement.

The next paragraph is the most chillingly significant: "As the President has 
recognized, combating hate crimes requires more than a legal strategy. It 
requires effective law enforcement, education, and vigilance. In the long run, 
the best way to combat such crimes is to reach potential perpetrat
ors early, before they are taught to hate and to act on their hate." (emphasis 
ours) In ADL parlance "potential perpetrators" are college-educated Black 
youth, who, according to their "polls and surveys," are the group with the 
fastest "most alarming" growth rate of anti-Semitism. Because the AD
L cannot tie hate crimes to this group they must speak of the "potential" 
rather than the actual. History demonstrates that precisely this language of 
"potential perpetrators" interned 110,000 Japanese in American concentration 
camps in early 1942. Lieutenant General John L. DeWitt used ADL-type
 language in his February 14, 1942 memo:





..It therefore follows that along the vital Pacific Coast over 112,000 
potential enemies, of Japanese extraction, are at large today....The very fact 
that no sabotage has taken place to date is a disturbing and confirming 
indication that such action will be taken. 



That convoluted configuration of official White Supremacy led to the wholesale 
violation of the rights of Japanese Americans.

Jewish "Hate" Strategy

This brings us immediately to "hate speech." The frightening thing about Min. 
Farrakhan, to them, is that he does it all with the Word. The Jewish strategy 
is to use the media to meld the terms "hate crimes" with "hate speech" with 
"terrorism", muddy the waters with heavy reporting of "domestic 
terrorism", and tie it all together with media imagery of the Ku Klux Klan and 
the militias threatening Blacks (note: It is reported that Seagram's Edgar 
Bronfman/World Jewish Congress is going to attempt to buy CBS). The negroes, 
meeting on the "Race Initiative," will call for legislation to co
mbat the KKK and "hate groups" which, when written, will be general enough to 
include (and even target) The Nation of Islam. These laws will nebulously refer 
to "hate speech" and "hate propaganda", its speakers and writers, and target 
501-C3 tax status and put all such prosecutions under the Att
orney General for his broad or narrow interpretation.

They will use a glib bumper sticker campaign like "Free Speech, Not Hate 
Speech" to rally and stampede this law through Congress. The weakening of the 
First Amendment will be explained away by some "National Security" argument. 
The underlying theme to the ignorant masses will be made acceptable"
Eliminate the complainers about race, and race relations will be better." The 
Jews will not be associated with this attack on Minister Farrakhan because they 
appeared not to be involved at the outset.

Proposed Options for Blacks:

It seems to me that the best way to thwart this plan is to expose it. The 
President, in a document on his Race Initiative entitled "What You Can Do", has 
called for town hall meetings. We, as good citizens, should seize the 
initiative and call for the meetings in our own communities and demand t
o be represented in the "official" meetings. The meetings should allow the 
people to vent their concerns on race and should be used to educate about the 
horrors of slavery and the Black experience with racism. This will also allow 
us an opportunity to organize for the Day of Atonement in various
 cities and also prepare for this proposed November White House conference on 
"Hate" which appears to be the "showdown" event for the Jews. May Almighty God 
ALLAH Bless Us All.
=-=--=-=-=-=
Western Imperative Network (WIN)
http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm

National Alliance (Europeans Only)
http://www.natall.com
















From lambert@morgan.net Wed Feb 18 11:54:02 EST 1998
Article: 64685 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 98 00:05:43 GMT
Subject: Re: God and ARYAN man
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,soc.culture.usa,triangle.politics
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
References: 
 <34e6b9e8.1077094@news.univie.ac.at> <34E701E7.35FF@online.no>
 <01bd3a2d$ae22d6a0$065a12ac@SECCCDMS.wins.compaq.com>
Lines: 70
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.40
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!Supernews73!supernews.com!howland.erols.net!news-feed.ifi.uio.no!WCG!news.randori.com!205.218.162.40
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64687 alt.discrimination:64685 soc.culture.usa:201016 triangle.politics:29420

On 2/15/98 10:20AM, in message 
<01bd3a2d$ae22d6a0$065a12ac@SECCCDMS.wins.compaq.com>, "Jack F" 
 wrote:


You are the real Hate-Monger. You are Politically Correct and without
objectivity, aren't you?




> Puhhhhhlease...!! Who cares what your personal deity is or believes or
> whatever. While I respect anyone's faith, that has nothing to do with the
> real, physical world(which is what I assume we are talking about here). I
> can believe that God is a giant pink snail who rides through town every day
> at noon tooting the star spangled banner on a tuba, if I so desire, but it
> doesn't prove anything. By the way...the God I believe in says "thou shalt
> send Jack all manner of good checks and monetary items in tribute."
> (sits waiting patiently for flood of green stuff to pour out of
> computer....hmmmm....must be a buncha NON believers!)
> JackF 
> 
> L. Smith  wrote in article
> <34E701E7.35FF@online.no>...
> > Thomas Mohr wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Sun, 15 Feb 98 05:48:24 GMT, lambert@morgan.net wrote:
> > > 
> > > >The evolved and perfected folk archetype known as Wotan,
> > > >the Allfather of the Aryan race, has long been revered as the high god
> > > >of our ancient ancestors. Wotan is not necessarily identical with the
> > > >image we project of him in time and space. The archetype runs deep
> > > >within our genetic memory and goes on working as before, like an
> unknown
> > > >quantity in the depths of our psyche.
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately for you, everything in the genetic memory can be
> > > checked. So, your proof that this type of god is genetically inherent
> > > in whites please ?
> > > 
> > > > It should
> > > >be understood that Wotan is not THE all-knowing incomprehensible God
> > > >absolute. Everything that we have come to know about Wotan reveals
> that
> > > >he, likewise, is personally pursuing an upward path towards the
> > > >understanding of life's great universal mysteries and perfection,
> > > >sharing many of our own human characteristics.
> > > 
> > > What for a pathetic God in comparison to the christian God. Your Wotan
> > > is obviously stumbling through a world he doesn't fully understand. He
> > > does that just like any human or animal. The concept of the christian
> > > God is, that he does not only understand the world, but he stands
> > > outside the universe since he has created it.
> > 
> > 
> > Who is this Wotan, anyway?
> > Is this a corruption of Odin from Scandic mythology, from which
> > Wednesday gets its name?
> > 
> > If so, that was a rather dead end religious myth even when it was
> > popular.
> > 
> > The Germanic Aryan master race is, and was, a joke. National Alliance
> > doesn't seem to brag openly about Adolph Hitler, but they certainly
> > spout his mindless hatred. 
> > -- 
> > - Larry Smith Sr
> > Remove the obvious error in my address for email replies
> > 




From lambert@morgan.net Mon Feb 23 22:24:55 EST 1998
Article: 64788 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 98 03:01:37 GMT
Subject: "The 15,000,000 Germans Murdered By The Anti-Racists" By Aryan 
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,alt.nswpp
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 382
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.40
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.40
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: jo.randori.com
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!Supernews73!supernews.com!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!nntp.texas.net!WCG!news.randori.com!205.218.162.40
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64805 alt.discrimination:64788 alt.nswpp:11487

On Sat, 29 Nov 1997 17:19:37 GMT, ourhero@ftcnet.com


Visit: Western Imperative Network (WIN)
http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm



Subject:      The 15,000,000 Germans Murdered By The Anti-Racists
From:         an572010@anon.penet.fi (The honourable Vyshinsky)
Date:         1996/07/30
Message-ID:   <212303Z30071996@anon.penet.fi>
Newsgroups:   soc.culture.german,alt.revisionism
[More Headers]


   The Fate of German Civilians 1945-1950

by James Bacque

  Paper for the Thirtieth Annual Conference of the Northern Great
  Plains Historians, Brandon, Manitoba, September 27/30, 1995.

An American naval officer named Captain Albert Behnke watched
German society collapsing under allied occupation in the western
zone. In his official report to the US Navy, he wrote "From 1945 to
the middle of 1948 one saw the probable collapse, disintegration
and destruction of a whole nation....Germany was subjected to
physical and psychic trauma unparalleled in history."

   In the British zone, the situation was so bad in early 1946 that
Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery, commanding the British occupation
forces in Germany, sent a cable to the British Foreign Office
demanding huge increases in food imports, with the warning that "If
we do not we shall produce death and misery to an extent which will
disgrace our administration in history and completely stultify
every effort  which we are making to produce a democratic Germany."
Nevertheless, in the British zone for six months in the
winter/spring of 1946-47, the official ration was around 1000 cpd,
slow but certain death by starvation. The official ration in the
French zone in January 1947 was 450 calories per day.  This was
half the ration of the Belsen concentration camp,

    As a result of the decisions of the UK, USSR and the USA at
Yalta and Potsdam, one quarter of eastern Germany was turned over
to the USSR and Poland. All 18 million Germans there and in
Czechoslovakia and other eastern countries, were subject to
expulsion. About 12 million starving, penniless refugees poured
into the remainder of Germany. This was the largest  ethnic
cleansing ever to have occurred in the world. Nearly all of them
were women and children, with a small mix of very old men. Raped,
robbed, beaten, ignored, shot, hanged, they made their way west.
Millions of them collapsed and died by the roadside as they went.

   For long periods in the American zone, the ration was officially
1275 calories per day, nowhere near enough to support health.
Presidential emissary Herbert Hoover told the President of the
United States that "the 1550 ration is wholly incapable of
supporting health."

   This was not due to any supposed world food shortage. The food
production of the world measured in calories per capita in October
1945 by the US Office of Foreign Agricultural Relations was 90% of
prewar. Food production in the world for 1945-46 per capita
outside the US was about 12% below prewar levels.  Distributed
according to need, this food would have been easily adequate to
feed everyone, because the prewar average was well above basic
human need. For 1946-47, world production was up by 7% meaning that
overall, it was very close to prewar levels.

   World production was virtually normal in 1947, except in
Germany, where 1947 was known as a Hunger Year. Since the rest of
the world was so close to normal, it is clear that the reason for
German starvation was not that there was a fatal world shortage of
food. Germans starved mainly because they were prevented from
supplying themselves. Available food was not sent to them, and at
the same time, they were prevented both from growing enough and
>from  buying enough to feed themselves. International aid went to
every country except Germany, because there, it was forbidden for
over a year, until mid-1946.

  The Americans who helped to plan and carry out all this stood
accused in the United States Senate of what we today would call
crimes against humanity. Senator Langer of North Dakota said in
March, 1946: "History already records that a savage minority of
bloody bitter-enders within this government forced the acceptance
of the brutal Morgenthau plan upon the present administration. I
ask, Mr President, Why in God's name did the administration accept
..this addlepated and vicious Morgenthau Plan?..."   The plan was
named after US Secretary of the Treasury Henry C. Morgenthau, one
of its progenitors.

   Senator Langer was not alone. His speech was warmly applauded.

   "Time and again,"  Senator Kenneth Wherry said in support of
Langer, "the administration has advanced the excuse that
transportation facilities were lacking, but for months scores of
ships have been lying idle in both eastern and European ports. So
it is not a question of the lack of ships. Furthermore, hundreds of
thousands of GI's in Europe are apparently sentenced to enforced
idleness for want of something to do.  Millions of dollars worth of
surplus trucks and jeeps are falling apart in their open-air
garages in Europe." Nor was food scarce, for there was plenty in
the civilian and the military stores, according to Senator Kenneth
Wherry, "...the truth is that there are thousands upon thousands of
tons of military rations in our surplus stock piles that have been
spoiling right in the midst of starving populations." The
government's defence of the Morgenthau Plan was reduced to rubble
by a couple of accurate criticisms, in which Senator Wherry was
joined by Senator Russell. The government  had said  that the
policy had been established in agreement with the allies not to
feed ex-enemies, but Russell said that the allies were feeding
Italians, who had also been the enemy during the war, and he
demanded to know why they received food, while the Germans starved.
The Japanese, also the former enemy, were also being fed.

      The relief of hunger around the world lay in the hands of a
few men in Ottawa and Washington during the spring of 1945. These
were the Prime Minister of Canada, Mackenzie King, his chief
assistant Norman Robertson, the new American President Harry
Truman, and a man with no office, Herbert Hoover.

    Hoover found that the only countries that could make up the
shortfall were Canada, the USA, Australia and Argentina. There was
a gap in the foreseeable future between the need for 26,000,000
tons of cereals and apparent supplies of around 15,000,000 tons. If
the statistics were correct, Hoover estimated that very soon some
800,000,000 people would starve. Most would die.

  The US Cabinet meeting on March 29 1946, with Truman, Secretary
of Agriculture Clinton Anderson and Secretary of War Robert
Patterson to discuss the food problem decided that  "...the real
trouble was one of price, it being more profitable for the farmers
today to feed their grain to animals than to sell it as grain. The
farmers were holding wheat in an expectation of a price rise."

   In his lengthy correspondence on the matter, Patterson
constantly refers to lack of priority, misallocation of rail cars
and so on, not to any production shortage. For instance, on June
13, 1947, he wrote urgently to Secretary of State George Marshall
that "Occupation [of Germany] has no chance of success if these
(famine) conditions continue. This state of affairs has been
foreseen, and I have urged repeatedly that priority be recognized
for food shipments to Germany. The basis for the priority is the
prevention of famine in the US-UK zones of Germany...."


In Canada, the government still maintained rationing and price
controls in 1946, while generously giving away wheat or selling it
below market value to those who needed it most.  Prime Minister
King was told by Norman Robertson, his senior policy adviser, in
February, 1946, that "Though the war ended nearly six months ago,
our food industry and Canadian consumers are still on a wartime
basis. Thus we rationed meat when others [i.e. Americans] were
dropping controls. We cut our rice consumption in half. We slashed
sugar and butter rations last year and took another big slice off
butter consumption a few days ago. We have always lived up to our
commitments. We are the only country in the world which has done
so."  This was done because  "...the people of Canada will wish
to make new efforts to help meet a world shortage and will expect
the government to give advice and direction as to the form those
efforts could most effectively take."

    By the end of 1946, Hoover was proclaiming "Triumph over the
greatest famine in world history." He claimed that hundreds of
millions of lives had been saved in the first world-wide famine
relief effort in human history. Only Germany was left out. For the
rest, it was an amazing creative achievement, following on the most
destructive war that mankind had ever known.

The disaster in Germany forced Truman to call on Hoover once again,
in 1947. Hoover suspected that the disaster was not a consequence
of the war, but had been caused by postwar allied policies, so he
placed an unprecedented condition on his consent. He asked for the
right to investigate the effects of American policy on Germany.
This was the first time that such a mandate had been asked of the
powerful Executive branch. Truman did not exactly agree, but he did
not refuse Hoover, who went ahead as he had planned. The results of
his investigations have formed the basis of my recent work and the
work of the notable American scholar, John Gimbel.

Here is what Hoover found in 1947. In the US-UK zone of Germany
industrial production had been forced down to 28% of 1938 output.
Food production in France and the UK had actually dropped in the
preceding year, partly because of the fall in German industrial
production which in turn was caused in part by the destruction of
German factories and machines, and the cutbacks in fuel production.
It was precisely oil production that Henry Morgenthau had fought
bitterly to ban in 1945, among 500 other banned items.  The
enforced reduction in oil production was particularly damaging to
the farmers, because it meant that their tractors were useless, and
other machinery endangered. The reduction in coal meant that it was
much more difficult to transport food to processing and preserving
centers. The ban on nearly all fertilizer production had severely
reduced production of food causing years of famine.

What was the Germans' agricultural capability in the summer of
1945? The British Foreign Office said in 1947 that the area
occupied by the British and Americans was capable of producing
about 1750 cpd for the local inhabitants, which was the production
before the war. The senior American political adviser in Germany,
Robert Murphy agreed.  They actually got around 1000 cpd most of
the time, and in the French zone sometimes as little as 450 cpd.

How many people died as a result of all this starvation? We have
today the census figures for Germany in October 1946 and for
September 1950 done by the Germans themselves under the control of
the four military governments of Germany. We know the birth, death,
immigration and emigration figures for the intervening years. So we
can determine by simple arithmetic the actual change in population
in the period.

OPTIONAL INSERT
I want  to emphasize here that these statistics are not difficult
to understand, but I have had them thoroughly checked by Dr Anthony
B. Miller, a world-renowned biostatistician and epidemiologist,
consultant to the World Health Organization at Geneva and Head of
the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology at the University
of Toronto. He has approved the conclusions which I now present to
you.
ENDS OPTIONAL

   The October, 1946 census of all four zones of occupied Germany
was carried out "by Germans under the direction of the Allied
Control Commission."  The second census, of August- September,
1950, was also carried out by Germans under the control of the four
occupying powers. We know the births recorded in the period. As a
result of the declassification of the Robert Murphy Papers from
1988 on, we know the number of expellees who arrived in occupied
Germany during the period between censusses.  The number of
prisoners discharged into Germany during the period is also known.
It is 2,600,000.   This number has been seriously disputed, but
the truth has been discovered in the KGB archives in Moscow,
recently opened to the light of scholarship. The official numbers
of deaths and emigres are also known.  With these figures in
place, we can swiftly calculate the number of people who should be
present for the census in 1950.

   The population of all occupied Germany in October 1946 was
65,000,000 according to the census prepared under the Allied
Control Commission.  The returning prisoners plus the newborn
plus the arriving expellees added 12,776,430 people to the original
population. Deaths and emigration totalled 3,835,539. So the
population that should have been found in 1950 was 73,940,891. But
the census of 1950 done by the German government under allied
supervision found only 68,230,796.  There was a shortage of
5,710,095 people,  according to the official figures. (Rounded to
5,700,000)

   There is not time here to give you all the evidence that the
most suspect figure in the censusses is the death total, but here
is a summary: To begin with, the official West German government
death figures are at odds with themselves. They report that the
death rate during two prosperous years of 1968, 1969 was 12.2 per
per thousand per year, which is higher than the death rate of 12.1
they report for 1947, a year of unparalleled misery, starvation,
want and epidemic disease, remembered by Germans as the Hunger Year
(Hungerjahr). That is incredible. I believe that the explanation
for this is simple: the source for the official German figure for
1947 was not German at all, it was the US Military governor Lucius
Clay, who reported the 12.1 figure to the President of the US. Dr
Alfred de Zayas, author of the definitive work on the expellees,
has several times since January 1994 asked the Statistisches
Bundesamt at Wiesbaden to explain this discrepancy and to reveal
their sources for statistics in 1945-50, and has received no
satisfaction. This also happened to a Member of the Bundestag who
made similar inquiries.

 The West German government death figures being reported to this
day are also at odds with most of the detailed sources that we
have, both German and Allied. Many cities report death rates well
above the official figure. Also  General Mark Clark, US Military
Commissioner in the US zone of Austria reported in April, 1946 that
the death rate in Vienna was varying between 27 and 35 per thousand
per year. His report stated that  "This relatively high death rate
prevailed during a period when the ration scale was 1550 cpd. With
a drop in the ration it is probable that these rates will
increase."   And in fact, those rations for Germans did drop by
about a third, or more. "During the first months of 1947, supplies
of food for the Combined [US and UK] zone fell again to the low
level of the two preceding winters." Daily rations were often less
than 1000 calories.  In Schleswig Holstein in the British zone,
the daily ration for seven months in mid-1947 was only 1,240
calories per day.

    The Medical Officer of Health of the U.S. Army reported that
the death rate in the U.S. zone in Germany in May 1946 was 21.5 per
thousand per year, and that it had previously been higher. Hoover
reported to the President that there had been an appalling increase
of 40% in deaths of aged people in only three months.  And so on.

Finally we know that there was an extraordinarily high death rate
because it was secretly reported by an impeccable source.
Ambassador Murphy again. He wrote in his Council of Foreign
Ministers preparatory papers, February 1947, that he expected the
German population overall to shrink by two million during the
period of the return of the prisoners of war, roughly the next two
to three years. This overall shrinkage would exist after allowing
for the net of births, deaths, emigration and immigration including
return of prisoners. He wrote that this tremendous loss of life
would occur because of the "present high death rate in Germany."

   I have calculated that Murphy must have based his prediction on
a phenomenal death rate, 24%.   This is about triple the modern
Canadian average, and about double the ambient contemporary
European average.

   The importance of Murphy's prediction can hardly be exaggerated.
It shows that he was basing official American policy on the
expectation that this phenomenal death rate already prevailing
nationwide, would continue for three more years. He believed it so
firmly that he put it on record to the State Department, to the
British, French, Soviet and other American officials in Germany.
And he based this on the same statistics that determined all allied
policy decisions for all four powers towards Germany. In other
words, by implication, all of the allied powers believed as Murphy
did, that the death rate in Germany was a catastrophe that would
continue for years.

   To give you some idea of the size of this catastrophe in terms
other than raw statistics, we can take Canada as an example. The
death rate in Canada today is roughly one third of the actual rate
prevailing in Germany in 1946-50. Spread over the 30,000,000
million people of Canada nowadays, the result would be about the
same as a Canadian city being hit with a Hiroshima size atomic bomb
every ten weeks for four years. Those are the extra deaths. Twenty
Hiroshimas.


Overall Summary

    In sum, there is compelling evidence from the census and from
Ambassador Murphy that between October 1946 and September 1950 in
the four occupied zones, some 5,700,000 German civilian residents
of Germany died but were not reported to have died. Although most
of these people died from lack of food, their deaths were not
caused by the World Food Shortage described by some historians.
They were dying seventeen months to five years after the German
surrender. They began dying when world food production was 97% of
normal. They were for a considerable time prevented from receiving
charitable help, and from earning their own bread. They went on
dying while world food production climbed ever higher. The great
majority of them were women, children and very old men.

    The Adenauer government also determined by survey that at least
1,500,000 Germans did not come home from Allied prisoner of war
camps. They all died.

   A further 2.1 million people, nearly all women and children, are
admitted by the West Germans and the Allies to have died among the
expellees during the expulsions. Notable authorities including
Konrad Adenauer, Chancellor of Germany, have written that at least
6 million among the expellees alone died.



                    TOTALS OF DEATHS
                        Minimum               Maximum
Expellees (1945-50)   2,100,000               6,000,000
Prisoners (1941-50)   1,500,000               2,000,000
Residents (1946-50)   5,700,000               5,700,000
Totals                9,300,000              13,700,000

   It is not possible from the figures available to determine how
many civilians died in the Soviet zone and how many in the western
zones.

   At least 9.3 million Germans died because of allied policies
after the war. This is many more Germans than died in battle, air
raids and concentration camps during the war.   Millions of these
people slowly starved to death in front of the victors' eyes every
day for years. These deaths have never been honestly reported by
either the Allies or the German government.

May the road rise to meet you.
May the wind be always at your back.
May the sun shine warm upon your face,
the rain fall soft upon your fields,
and until we meet again,
may God hold you in the palm of His hand.





From lambert@morgan.net Mon Feb 23 22:24:56 EST 1998
Article: 64852 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 98 02:21:49 GMT
Subject:  Jews Confiscation of Palestinian Land ..
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,soc.culture.jewish,soc.culture.palestine,soc.culture.usa
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 59
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.52
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.52
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: jo.randori.com
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!Supernews73!supernews.com!howland.erols.net!news-xfer.netaxs.com!WCG!news.randori.com!205.218.162.52
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64860 alt.discrimination:64852 soc.culture.jewish:244312 soc.culture.palestine:41704 soc.culture.usa:201429

LAWE - The Palestinian Society for the Protection of 
Human Rights and the Environment
PO Box 20873
Jerusalem, via Israel
Tel: (972) (2) 5812364/5824559
Fax: (972) (2) 5811072
email: lawe@netvision.net.il

On Sunday 10 November, the Israeli army shot and killed 
36 year old, Atallah Hassan Eid Amireh from Naalin 
village and injured 12 other Palestinians during a protest 
against Israeli land confiscation. The protest was 
organized by the Land Defense Committee in the Ramallah 
area against continued Israeli confiscations of 
Palestinian land.  The Israeli government intends to use 
the confiscated Palestinian land to expand Jewish 
settlements as part of its overall strategy to encircle 
the city of Ramallah with Jewish settlements. The protest 
yesterday focused on the confiscation of Palestinian
land from Der Qadees which will be used to expand the
ultra-orthodox Jewish settlement of Kiryat Sefer.  It 
was only a few weeks ago that the Israeli government gave 
approval for the expansion to begin.

According to affidavits taken by fieldworkers working for
LAWE, witnesses stated that early in the morning of
November 10, Israeli soldiers began concentrating on the
borders of Der Qadees village near Ramallah where the
protest was set to be held.   When the villagers started 
their protest soldiers began to shoot tear gas bombs and 
rubber bullets.  Despite the tear gas and bullets, the 
protesters continued their demonstration.  The Israeli 
soldiers then began to shoot live ammunition bullets at 
close range at the demonstrators.  Mr. Amira was killed 
instantly by a bullet that was fired at him only 12 meters 
away. The bullet penetrated his heart and killed him.  
Twelve other Palestinians were injured from the live 
ammunition and rubber bullets.

Mr. Amira's land was among the land to be confiscated.  
He submitted a petition to the Israeli court to cancel the
confiscation order but to no avail.  Family members said 
that Mr. Amira was shocked when he heard that the government
was taking his land to expand the Kiryat Sefer settlement.

LAWE- The Palestinian Society for the Protection of Human
Rights and the Environment condemns the Israeli use of live
fire on Palestinian civilians.  LAWE believes that the Israeli
action violates the right of all free persons to protest and
speak out against  government actions.
-=-==-=-=-
Western Imperative Network (WIN)
http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm

National Alliance (Euro-Americans Only)
http://www.natall.com

Nationalist Party
http://www.nationalist.org



From lambert@morgan.net Mon Feb 23 22:24:56 EST 1998
Article: 64855 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 98 03:34:24 GMT
Subject: Re: Fundamentalist Christian Plots Anthrax Attack
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.christnet,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.homosexuality
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
References: <34A0081A.DDF800BD@usaor.net> <34A01517.7451@LaserFX.0spam.com>
 <34a1350e.369697516@news.pacbell.net> <34bab130.12875498@news.idirect.com>
 <67tscd$amn@sjx-ixn11.ix.netcom.com> 
 <680db4$c8b@sjx-ixn4.ix.netcom.com> <34abaf74.35416055@news.idirect.com>
 <34A580CA.6AD7@swbell.net> <34c42538.43159809@news.idirect.com>
 <34A705E7.4645@LaserFX.0spam.com> 
 <34A87786.5539@LaserFX.0spam.com> <34ecc2b6.4459486@news.alpha.net>
Lines: 35
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.52
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.52
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: jo.randori.com
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!WCG!news.randori.com!205.218.162.52
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.christnet:341521 alt.discrimination:64855 alt.politics.homosexuality:132775

On 2/19/98 6:57PM, in message <34ecc2b6.4459486@news.alpha.net>, algeier 
 wrote:

> CBS News had a story on the arrest of two men who had a "biologic"
> agent in their possession. This was believed to be Anthrax. Earlier
> stories had mentioned a plan to release the deadly germs on a New York
> Subway.
> 
> CBS had investigated one of the men, a microbiologist, a couple years
> ago, when he was caught with bubonic plague bacteria.

I believe one of these men is a known "Neo-Nazi" member of Aryan Nations.



> 
> The man is a member of a Christian Identity church. This is a
> Fundamentalist Christian group that believes, among other things, that
> homosexuals should be put to death.


As the bible stated a :
-=-==-=-=-
Western Imperative Network (WIN)
http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm

Nationalist Party for Euro-Americans
http://www.nationalist.org

White Aryan Resistance -Race Hate
http://www.resist.com

Jewish Defense League -Will Kill for Food
http://www.jdl.org




From lambert@morgan.net Mon Feb 23 22:24:56 EST 1998
Article: 64870 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 98 06:42:45 GMT
Subject: Aryan Nations and Biological Warfare?
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.white-power,soc.culture.african.american,soc.culture.israel,soc.culture.usa,triangle.politics
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 132
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.52
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.52
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: jo.randori.com
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!newsfeed.direct.ca!feeder.qis.net!nntp.abs.net!WCG!news.randori.com!205.218.162.52
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:64885 alt.discrimination:64870 alt.politics.white-power:116637 soc.culture.african.american:230071 soc.culture.israel:123469 soc.culture.usa:201487 triangle.politics:29482



FBI: Two Arrested in NYC Subway Germ Plot 
Updated 1.00 p.m. ET (1800 GMT) February 19, 1998

FOX News - Two members of white supremacist group Aryan Nation have been 
arrested in Nevada and accused of plotting a bacterial attack on the New 
York City subways, according to the FBI. 

The source spoke in New York on condition of anonymity and provided no 
other details. 

A news conference is scheduled for 2 p.m. ET.

Nevada FBI officials said the men were taken into custody in a luxury 
car outside a doctor's office in Henderson, Nev., near Las Vegas. 

The New York source said the suspects allegedly planned to release a 
"dangerous bacterial substance" in the subways. 

FBI spokesman Aurelio Flores in Las Vegas said only that the matter was 
"serious" and that different teams from around the country are "coming 
in to look at what we have." 

In Washington, a federal law enforcement source said agents were 
investigating allegations that the two men arrested in Las Vegas 
possessed anthrax. The source stressed that the tests were not complete 
and that there have been unfounded instances in the past involving 
allegations of anthrax. 

Anthrax is an infectious disease that usually afflicts only animals, 
especially cattle and sheep. But Anthrax spores can be produced in a dry 
form suitable for weapons and can be fatal to humans even in microscopic 
amounts. 
-=-=-=-=-



Two men arrested in what may be anthrax poisoning plot 

By Robert Macy
Associated Press 

LAS VEGAS -- Two men were charged today with possessing a dangerous biological 
agent believed to be anthrax, the FBI said. 

The suspects include a central Ohio man who was given probation after pleading 
guilty to illegally obtaining bubonic plague bacteria through the mail.

The FBI arrested the men as they were possibly about to test the agent in some 
way at a medical center in suburban Henderson, said Bobby Siller, special agent 
in charge of the Las Vegas FBI office.

He identified the men, who were being held at the Clark County Detention 
Center, as 46-year-old Larry Wayne Harris and 47-year-old William Leavitt.

Siller said the substance had not yet been confirmed as anthrax. He also 
stressed that the area where the arrests occurred was never in any danger.

"It was suspected that these individuals were in possession of a dangerous 
biological chemical anthrax," Siller told a news conference.

Anthrax is an infectious disease that usually afflicts only animals, especially 
cattle and sheep. But anthrax spores can be produced in a dry form suitable for 
weapons and can be fatal to humans even in microscopic amounts.

There was no indication whether the men had any target in mind for an attack, 
Siller said.

The men were arrested outside the medical center at 7:30 p.m. Wednesday. They 
were in a beige Mercedes, which was sealed, impounded and taken to nearby 
Nellis Air Force Base.

"These individuals were involved in the construction of a weapon," FBI 
spokesman Aurelio Flores said. "We have no idea where they were going to use 
it."

Flores said the FBI has secured the area where the car was found and had "made 
everything safe." He said the agency was not looking for explosives.

In New York, another FBI source had said earlier that the suspects were members 
of the Aryan Nation, a white supremacist group, and allegedly planned to 
release a "dangerous bacterial substance" in that city's subways. But Mayor 
Rudolph Giuliani said that his city was not the target, and Flores 
said a number of cities may have been discussed.

Siller said he couldn't conform any link to the supremacist group or possible 
targets. But Flores said earlier that some subway system might have been a 
target.

"These individuals were trying to be maybe copycats of what happened in Japan," 
Flores said, referring to a 1995 nerve gas attack on the Tokyo subway that 
killed 12 people. "They might have talked about different cities. We have no 
conclusive evidence to indicate that they were talking about a s
pecific city. It was loose talk.

"The important thing is that everything is safe," Flores said.

Last year, Harris pleaded guilty to a count of fraud after he was accused of 
illegally obtaining bubonic plague bacteria through the mail from a laboratory. 
He said he never intended to hurt anyone and was sentenced to 18 months' 
probation.

Harris was arrested in May 1995 after a Rockville, Md., laboratory sent three 
vials of the freeze-dried, inactive bacteria to his home in Lancaster, Ohio, 
about 30 miles southeast of Columbus.

Even after pleading guilty to the charge, he maintained he did nothing wrong. 
He said he wanted the bacteria for research for his book, "Bacteriological 
Warfare: A Major Threat to North America."

"I am a scientist. I am absolutely of no harm to anyone. I never, never 
intended to hurt anyone," he said then.

Harris promoted the 131-page book in November 1996 -- after his indictment but 
before he was sentenced -- at an exposition at the Ohio state fairgrounds 
designed to help people protect themselves from germ warfare.

He told people gathered around his booth that they should take antibiotics to 
protect themselves against bubonic plague, which he said could be spread at any 
time.

The bubonic plague killed one-fourth of the European population in the 1300s 
but now can be treated with antibiotics.

Distributed by The Associated Press (AP) 




------------------------------------------------------------------------
© 1998 Star-Telegram -- Terms and Conditions -- Send us your Feedback.



From lambert@morgan.net Mon Feb 23 22:24:56 EST 1998
Article: 65146 of alt.discrimination
From: lambert@morgan.net
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 98 04:32:31 GMT
Subject: Re: Destructive Non-White Immigration
Message-ID: 
Newsgroups: alt.california,alt.discrimination,soc.culture.usa,triangle.politics
X-Newsreader: Quarterdeck Message Center [2.00]
Lines: 126
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.55
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.218.162.55
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: jo.randori.com
Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!fu-berlin.de!nntp.abs.net!WCG!news.randori.com!205.218.162.55
Xref: news.trends.ca alt.california:65195 alt.discrimination:65146 soc.culture.usa:202219 triangle.politics:29548

On 2/21/98 5:18PM, in message <34ef6025.407430@news.univie.ac.at>, 




> >:>Lambert, do you have personal experiences with hispanics ?

Yes. I spent the first 13 years of my life in South Texas. Whites
were the minority in this city. I grew up in a "multi-cultural"
environment with the Mexican culture predominating. I was taught
to respect these people -- and I generally practiced this self-
discipline.


>  I bet not.

I bet yes!


> >:>The hispanics I met are very smart and extremely hard working people.
> >:>They are proud, strong willed and willing to bear. Americans often
> >:>speak about the importance of their "traditional values" of family,
> >:>friendship, community a.s.o., but the hispanics I met  don't speak
> >:>about it, but they live it.


 This is a generalization. Many Mexican families had cousins and
uncles living at the same residence. Like Europe of old, the concept
of a *familia* is rooted in a social fabric of immediate and extended
members of such a "clan" or "tribe." One, the very concept of a
*nuclear* family does not predate the past two centuries! (I know,
this is my field of specialty)

 The family was also an economic, social, and noble institution. It
was not uncommon for a brother to marry a sister, nor a nephew to a niece.

Perhaps I should write an essay on this topic. One would find the
truths startling!

> 
> 
> Have you hispanic friends or only acquaintances ? I bet not. Otherwise
> you would know how strong family ties are in this group of people.
> White Americans often rank job over their friends and relatives. I
> never saw a hispanic do that.


Of course! This "racist" hates other people! To promote the ethnicity
and uniqueness of people is not what I would term "racist." I have
said on numerous occasions that I hate egalitarianism and those
who promote it. I support the constitutional right to freedom of
association and self-determination.

 Your Question on Whites: I would admit that Whites are not in a
position to overcome their superimposed "morality" based on subjectivism
or overt materialism.


Please read this newspaper clip (Feb.21,1998)

 VATICAN CITY -- Pope John Paul II defended motherhood yesterday,
denouncing those who suggest that maternity is a "weight and an
illness."

 In remarks to an international conference on women's health issues,
the pope criticized research into women's reproductive health that
concludes that motherhood is an illness. '>snip<

 The anarchistic concepts of an extreme scientific rationalism/
materialism condemns outright the Western traditional mores of
women and marriage. The Pope is right in condemning such nonsense.

If one wanted to conceptually understand the mysticism of love,
I would suggest the wisdom of Plato's "Symposium." It is a spiritual
guide catered to the Indo-European psyche.

 Would I (a traditonal and moral person) want to be integrated
 with men-hating feminists? No! I would tire of the ranting and
bannering of the oft-repeated quote, "Men think with their
dicks." (sic). Of course one could reply with emphatic
criticism that our ancestors had strange concoctions to
invoke the chemical, phenylethylamine, yes -- a molecule
known to speed up the flow of information between nerve cells --
when we are excited by an act of sexual attraction. 

 Shakespeare once wrote in his magnificent play, "Macbeth" that
alcohol "provokes the desire, but takes away the performance."

My world-view is different from the feminists because I base
mine on a historical view rather than a gender-class-war issue.
If one were to ask the opinion of a surreal Marxist:

 "What do you think of electing a H.Ross Perot or Steve Forbes
to presidency?"

An automaton Marxist would reply: "No, he is a capitalist pig."

 Likewise, I do not like being tarred with the same brushstroke
you "great thinkers" impose upon me or the great Western Imperative
Network.

 Regarding Mexicans: They place great value on their own people.
>From  my experiences with them, they are friendly towards those
not of their kind, but they are not hesitant to beat up "the gringo"
with a volley of their cousins packing together to get you.

I know! I have had enough fights with these people to know this
cultural trait.

 They
typically stick to their own, but are known to be decent and respectful
to others. And don't they ever tire of listening to Richie Valen's,
La Bamba? (Hee-hee)!
-=-=-=-=-=-
Western Imperative Network (WIN)
http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm

The Nationalist Party (A Party for Separatists)
http://www.nationalist.org

Radical Revolutionaries/For Euro-Americans
http://www.natall.com

 






Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor

© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012

This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and to combat hatred. Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.

As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.