In this article, Giwer responds to the article I posted to news.admin.net-abuse.misc in which I quoted an article of his verbatim and pointed out that he was admitting that his goal was to "make it [alt.revisionism] useless" to anyone who rejects revisionist arguments. Actually, he's responding to the email I sent him. (Note that he says something about email to root, which doesn't make sense -- I didn't Cc his service provider's root, I just sent Giwer a courtesy copy in email. Giwer was the one who sent a note to _my_ ISP's root, which I find a little puzzling. See: http://www.almanac.bc.ca/cgi-bin/ftp.pl?people/g/giwer.matt/net-abuse/complaints-to-root But I digress...) Oh, and he calls me a "lying bastard son of a something or other," which I invite him to try to prove :-) Anyway, the point is that he doesn't deny being an admitted net abuser. He simply says I'm "creating an issue where there is no issue." Whatever that means. Path: news.voyager.net!aanews.merit.net!imci3!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!netnews.worldnet.att.net!ix.netcom.com!news From: firstname.lastname@example.org Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: a typical example of a holohugger tactic Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 08:58:59 GMT Organization: images incarnate Lines: 91 Message-ID: <email@example.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: tam-fl2-12.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Jun 21 4:00:57 AM CDT 1996 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 You will note that this lying bastard son of a something or other insists upon creating an issue where there is no issue. And you will note that it contradicts the previous clain that complaints to root would be unethical. Yes, holohuggers are unethical. And, they lie. But of course to support the holocaust they have to be liars. Return-Path:
Received: (from smap@localhost) by ixmail3.ix.netcom.com (8.7.5/SMI-4.1/Netcom) id BAA24381; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 01:22:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vixa.voyager.net(184.108.40.206) by ixmail3 via smap (V1.3) id sma024073; Fri Jun 21 01:22:49 1996 Received: from clmx46.dial.voyager.net (clmx46.dial.voyager.net [220.127.116.11]) by vixa.voyager.net (8.7.3/CICNet) with SMTP id EAA00053; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 04:22:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199606210822.EAA00053@vixa.voyager.net> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 04:23:02 -0400 From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Jamie McCarthy) To: email@example.com Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com Subject: Re: A discrepency among exterminationists... Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.misc,alt.bonehead.matt-giwer,alt.revisionism Followup-To: news.admin.net-abuse.misc,alt.bonehead.matt-giwer References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> Organization: Absence Software (A copy of this message has also been posted to the following newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.misc, alt.bonehead.matt-giwer,alt.revisionism) Cross-posted to news.admin.net-abuse.misc; emailed "FYI" to various people whom Giwer calls "hijackers" and several pro-free-speech acquaintances of mine, as well as Mr. Giwer himself of course. Matt Giwer states proudly and publicly that his goal is to take alt.revisionism and "make it useless" to everyone with whom he disagrees. He has so far tried to accomplish this chiefly through sheer posting volume. Quite an upstanding net.citizen is Mr. Giwer! In article <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote (quoted in its entirety): : email@example.com (tom moran) wrote: : : >firstname.lastname@example.org (DvdThomas) wrote: : : >>Heck, since Dan Keren is using retreads, I may as well do the same: : : >Dvd, I don't think there is any need to justify using material that : >has been posted before. After all, the material is not posted out here : >just to convince the usual. It should be posted for the reasons of : >informing any new comers to alt.rev. : : I think it is an outstanding policy to return floods of reposts with : floods of reposts. : : After all the holohuggers think they own this conference. It is about : time they learned better. After all if a low IQ person such as I can do : what two of them now have said I have done, if everyone starts doing : this we may be able to firmly re-establish this as a conference on : revisionism. : : That is, make it useless to the hijackers. Nizkor will continue to maintain an archive on this net abuser's tactics and goals at: http://www.almanac.bc.ca/cgi-bin/ftp.pl?people/g/giwer.matt/net-abuse -- Jamie McCarthy http://www.absence.prismatix.com/jamie/ email@example.com Co-Webmaster of http://www.almanac.bc.ca/ Unless you specify otherwise, I assume pro-"revisionism" email to be in the public domain. I speak only for myself.
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Home · Site Map · What's New? · Search Nizkor