The Nizkor Project: Remembering the Holocaust (Shoah)

Shofar FTP Archive File: people/f/faurisson.robert/press/echorouk.20090112


http://www.globalfire.tv/nj/09en/history/faurisson_echorouk.htm

Robert Faurisson?s Historic Testimony

January 12, 2009

Interview given by Professor Robert Faurisson to the Algerian Arabic-language
daily Echorouk (Dawn). English version.

"The Holocaust" is a historical lie. At the very height of the Zionist massacre
of which Gaza Palestinians are now the victims, Professor Robert Faurisson
states once more that there was never any genocide of the Jews during the
Second World War and that the Nazis, under Hitler?s rule, never perpetrated
what today is called "the Holocaust". Since he began expressing his convictions
publicly the Jewish lobby has never ceased attacking and persecuting him for
his historical research and his opinions. I first met him just over two years
ago at the international conference on "the Holocaust" held in Tehran
(http://www.echoroukonline.com/ara/interviews/10166.html). Since then we?ve met
and corresponded a number of times [1]. With Israel?s war against Gaza,
Professor Faurisson has once again opposed and stood up to the Jews in
disclosing and expounding on their aims, and on their baseness. I?ve asked him
to grant an interview to Echorouk and he has readily agreed. In his reading of
the situation, Professor Faurisson foresees, in the long term, defeat for the
Jews in their occupation of Palestine; those Jews will experience the fate of
all invaders.

Interview conducted by Mourad Ouabass.

Who are you, Robert Faurisson?

Professor Dr. Robert Faurisson

I?m about to turn 80 years of age. I was born near London in 1929 to a French
father and a Scottish mother. I?m both a British subject and a French citizen.
I?ve been a university professor. I taught at the Sorbonne and at a university
in Lyon. I earned the agrégation (a degree obtained after the highest
competitive examination) in modern and classical languages and literature
(French, Latin, Greek) and hold a doctorate in literature and the social
sciences (which encompass history). My two specialities have been "modern and
contemporary French literature" and the "appraisal of texts and documents
(literature, history, media)". I have taken a special interest in Second World
War propaganda.

Can you briefly inform Algerian readers of your research work, the aim of which
has been to revise the history of what today is called "the Holocaust" of the
Jews?

At the Nuremberg trial (1945-1946), a court made up of the victors of the
recent war accused a vanquished Germany

1) of having ordered and planned the physical extermination of the Jews of
Europe;

2) of having, to that purpose, designed, built and used weapons of mass
destruction called, particularly, "gas chambers";

3) of having, essentially with those weapons but by other means as well, caused
the death of six million Jews.

How have you revised those accusations?

To back up that triple accusation, repeated for the past sixty years and more
by all the big Western media, no evidence capable of withstanding serious
examination has ever been produced. I?ve therefore come to the following
conclusion: The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the
Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic
political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the state of
Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people ?
but not their leaders ? and the Palestinian people in their entirety.

What effects have there been of your publishing the findings from your
historical research, which conflict with the generally held belief in what is
called "the Holocaust"?

My life became hell from the day in July 1974 when I was denounced by the
Israeli newspaper Yedioth Aharonoth. From 1974 to today I have suffered ten
physical assaults, I?ve had countless court cases and convictions and have
ended up being deprived of the right to teach at university. In France, in
order to silence the "revisionists" that we are, the Jewish lobby got a special
law passed, the Fabius-Gayssot Act of July 13, 1990, modelled on an Israeli law
of July 1986. Laurent Fabius is a Socialist member of parliament, extremely
rich and a Jew, whilst Jean-Claude Gayssot is a Communist MP. The
Fabius-Gayssot Act provides for up to a year?s imprisonment, a fine of ?45,000
and still other sanctions for those who "challenge" the alleged "Holocaust". In
nearly all the Western world, with or without any special law, revisionism is
severely punished. A certain number of my revisionist colleagues or friends
have been or are now in prison, some for long years, especially in Germany and
Austria, countries with which no [real] peace treaty has yet been signed
following the end of hostilities in 1945 and whose governments remain subject
to the will of the victors of the Second World War.

Has "the Holocaust" become a worldwide taboo?

In the Western world, people have the right to challenge all religions, except
the religion of "the Holocaust". One may make fun of God, Jesus, Mohamed but
not of what Simon Wiesenthal, Elie Wiesel and Simone Veil have had to say about
the alleged genocide or the alleged gas chambers. Auschwitz has become a holy
shrine. Pilgrimages to it are organised. Visitors see the alleged relics of the
alleged gassing victims: shoes, eyeglasses, hair, and steel cans that once
contained Zyklon B, an insecticide presented as having been the substance used
to kill the Jews whereas it was actually used for disinfecting clothing or
buildings in camps ravaged by typhus epidemics. We are told that the Germans
sought "the final solution of the Jewish question" in Europe and that those
words concealed, apparently, their desire to exterminate the Jews. That?s
false. There mustn?t be any cheating here. The Germans, in reality, sought "a
final TERRITORIAL solution of the Jewish question". They wanted to expel the
Jews to a territory that would then be their own. It?s accurate to say that
before the war they thought, for a time, that the territory might be in
Palestine but, very quickly, they reckoned that solution would be impossible,
and that it must be discarded out of consideration for "the noble and valiant
Arab people" (sic! I guarantee that those were their words).

What really happened, then?

During the war the Germans, keen to neutralise the Jews, placed a certain
number of them in concentration or labour camps to wait out the conflict. They
put off the definitive solution till after the war?s end. During the war, and
up to the last months thereof, they said to the Allies: "You marvel at the
Jews, do you? Take them, then. We?re ready to send you as many European Jews as
you want but on one express condition: that they remain in Britain until the
end of the war; on no pretence must they go to Palestine; the Palestinian
people have already suffered so much at the hands of Jews that it would be an
?indecency? (sic) to add to their martyrdom".

With that you prompt me to ask you your opinion on the massacre now going on in
Gaza.

Today, more than ever, the Palestinian people are enduring an appalling plight.
The Israeli army, after having inflicted on them "Operation Grapes of Wrath",
then "Operation Jenin Defensive Shield" followed by "Operation Rainbow" and
"Operation Day of Repentance", is now inflicting "Operation Cast Lead" on them.
In vain! In vain for, in my view, the State of Israel will not live even as
long as the Frankish kingdom of Jerusalem did, that is, 89 years. Most of the
Jews there will quit those lands in the same panic as the French colonists
quitting Algiers in 1962 or the American army abandoning Saigon in 1975.
Palestine will become once more a free country where Moslems, Christians, Jews
and others will be able to live together. At least that?s the wish I myself
hold, I who for 34 years have been treated in France like a sort of
Palestinian. I said this on December 11th and 12th, 2006, during the conference
on "the Holocaust" organised in Tehran under the aegis of President
Ahmadinejad: we all have the means to help in the liberation of Palestine.
These means consist in making known to the whole world the findings of
revisionist research. All credibility must be taken away from the alleged
"Holocaust", which has become the number one weapon of Zionism and the State of
Israel; this lie is the sword and shield of that State. It would be absurd to
try to defend against the Israelis? military armament whilst sparing their
number one worldwide propaganda weapon.

I?ve recently learnt that still another court case against you looms because of
your persistence in challenging ­? as is forbidden in France ? the reality
of the Jewish "Holocaust". When will your troubles in the law-courts ever end?
After all, you?re about to reach the age of 80.

I?ll tell you now that at my next trial, of which I don?t yet know the date, I
shall make the following declaration to the three judges in the 17th chamber of
the Paris criminal court (2, 4 Boulevard du Palais, 75001 Paris): "Whoever
allows himself to claim that the alleged Nazi gas chambers and the alleged
genocide of the Jews are a historical reality is, whether he likes it or not,
giving support to a horrid lie that has become the number one war propaganda
weapon of the State of Israel, a colonialist, racist and imperialist State. Let
whoever has the nerve to support the ?Holocaust? myth look at his hands! His
hands are red with the blood of Palestinian children!"

[1] The first interview with Professor Faurisson was published in Echorouk on
December 27, 2006 and can be found on the Internet at
http://www.echoroukonline.com/ara/interviews/10166.html. 


Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor

© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012

This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and to combat hatred. Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.

As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.