The Nizkor Project: Remembering the Holocaust (Shoah)

Shofar FTP Archive File: people/e/evans.richard/Kershaw-review.020707

The truth will out - Books.

By Ian Kershaw
7 July 2002 
The Sunday Times English 
(c) 2002 Times Newspapers Ltd 

TELLING LIES ABOUT HITLER The Holocaust, History and the David Irving
Trial. By Richard J Evans. Verso 14 pp326

What is historical truth? Historians and philosophers have debated the
issue for decades. It is an argument without end. Some have taken
Pontius Pilate's way out. Most have sought some kind of relative rather
than absolute truth in the writing of history. A few extreme
relativists have argued that any quest for truth or objectivity in
history is pointless. In their view, writing about the past is no more
than an expression of opinion, dependent upon the personal perspective
and approach of the historian.

A touchstone for evaluating such views has often been the Holocaust. If
there are no certainties about the horrors that took place so recently
in Nazi-occupied Europe, then can we really know anything at all about
the past, even the recent past where documentary sources are so
plentiful? And if history is just a matter of opinion and of how the
past is reconstructed in the minds of historians, then is not one view
of the Holocaust of equal value to the next - even views that deny that
it actually took place?

When he wrote In Defence of History, published in 1997 and strongly
critical of postmodernist relativisation of historical knowledge,
Richard J Evans, a distinguished historian of modern Germany and holder
of the chair of modern history at Cambridge University, had no inkling
that he would soon be called upon to put historical method to the test,
under the glare of attention from the world's media, as the leading
expert witness in one of the most striking libel cases of recent times
- the lawsuit brought by David Irving against Deborah Lipstadt and
Penguin Books alleging defamation through the claim that he was a
Holocaust denier. Evans's new book, Telling Lies about Hitler, is a
triumphant demonstration, on one of the most important issues
imaginable, of the virtues of proper and sound historical method.

Acres of print have been devoted to the Irving case, which ran for two
months in early 2000, but nothing rivals the importance or authority of
this book, based largely on the expert report that Evans produced for
the court, and which in turn underpinned Mr Justice Gray's devastating
judgment on Irving. It is remarkable, given the legal demolition of
Irving's reputation as a historian, that several well-known publishing
houses backed out of publishing the book for fear of further libel
writs. Much credit is owing, therefore, to Verso for finally making
available in this country a book that appeared in America (where libel
laws are less weighted towards the claimant) a year earlier.

The nature of English libel law determined that the only defence
against Irving's libel suit was to prove that the allegedly libellous
statements were true. This, in turn, placed the onus on the work of
expert historians who were able to assess the highly complex evidence
for what, it was asserted, Irving was denying: the gassing facilities
at Auschwitz, the murder of millions of Jews in a systematic Nazi
extermination programme, and Hitler's authorisation of that programme.
And since Irving had always staked his claim to preeminence, in his
writing on Nazi Germany, on his mastery of archival sources which the
professional historians he so often derided had not consulted, it was
vital that his use of such sources was proved to be deliberately
tendentious - that is, weighted consistently towards a particular
interpretation of events and deliberately omitting or distorting
evidence which ran counter to that interpretation.

This was the task which fell upon Evans and the other expert witnesses
in the case. It was not an easy one. Irving used a wide array of
unpublished sources, many obscure, in his books, and his way of
referencing (as I found out when checking the sources for my books on
Hitler) often meant that it was extraordinarily difficult to track them
down. Only through such meticulously detailed and technical work was it
possible to mount a legal defence. And this defence, based on
historical method, was necessary to establish that denial of the
Holocaust rested on falsified and distorted use of evidence.

All in all, then, it was correct to say, as the first chapter of
Evans's book explains, that in the court-room drama of spring 2000,
history itself was "on trial". Those who thought otherwise, and that a
law court was not the place to determine issues of historical knowledge
and interpretation, were mistaken. The rules of evidence in a law-suit
are tougher than those conventionally applied in an article for a
historical journal. This was all the more reason why the denial of the
systematic mass murder of the Jews needed to be shown, through the most
rigorous historical method, to be false. For, in the event of an Irving
victory, those who, for pernicious reasons, insisted that the Holocaust
was a massive historical hoax would have gained enormous legitimation
for their case.

In the central chapters of his book, Evans clinically dissects Irving's
key historical writings to reveal a consistent exoneration of Hitler's
role in the persecution, then extermination, of the Jews, and a
conscious distortion of the evidence for the systematic gassings in the
death-camps. By careful evaluation of Irving's unpublished papers,
letters and speeches made available to the court, he is able to show
Irving's marked adoption, from the late 1980s onwards, of Holocaust
denial approaches.

Among the most impressive parts of the book is Evans's analysis of
Irving's early bestseller, first published in 1963, The Destruction of
Dresden. Through painstaking assessment of the evidence, and of
Irving's use of it, Evans demonstrates that Irving massively inflated
the number of victims of the terrible bombing of Dresden's civilian
population in February 1945, continuing to insist on implausibly high
figures even when the main source on which he had relied had been
revealed as a crude Nazi forgery. "Irving's overriding purpose,"
comments Evans, "was to drive up the figure of those killed in the
raids by any means until it became many times greater than the actual
number, and began to achieve implicit and, in the end, explicit
comparability with the mass murders carried out by the Nazis at
Auschwitz and elsewhere." Irving's "repeated manipulations and
distortions" of the Dresden death toll had occurred in his first book
in English. The misuse of evidence had, therefore, started long before
Irving "began to argue that Hitler had been a friend of the Jews, and
more than two decades before he started to deny the existence of the
gas chambers". There was a pattern to the distortion of evidence, in
other words, and it went back to the beginning of Irving's career as a

It took almost two years of research by Evans and his two assistants,
Thomas Skelton-Robinson and Nik Wachsmann, before the expert report was
ready for use at the trial, and it has been a further two years before
Evans's book has finally been made available in Britain. But the time
spent was worthwhile and the frustrations incurred in the delayed
publication have not been in vain. Evans deserves our gratitude for
undermining the pseudo-historical basis of Holocaust denial. Though it
would be no bad thing if Irving and the trial finally slipped out of
the limelight, it is good that we have Evans's book to remind us of the
rules of historical evidence, and, in particular, how history should
not be written. Even if the nature of historical truth remains a matter
of continuing and legitimate debate, Telling Lies about Hitler leaves
us in no doubt that there is such a thing as historical untruth.

Ian Kershaw's Hitler: 1889-1936: Hubris and Hitler: 1936-1945: Nemesis
are published by Penguin. Telling Lies about Hitler is available at the
Books Direct price of 11.20 plus 1.95 p&p on 0870 165 8585 Read on...


Forum for Holocaust survivors, to promote remembrance

(c) Times Newspapers Ltd, 2002.

Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor

© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012

This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and to combat hatred. Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.

As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.