Archive/File: orgs/french/foreign-office/yellow-book-documents.001
Last-Modified: 1997/10/19
PART ONE
The Munich Agreement and its
Application
(September 29-October 4, 1938)
No. 12
Agreement concluded at Munich, September 29,
1938, between Germany, Great Britain, France and
Italy
GERMANY, the United Kingdom, France and Italy, taking
into consideration the agreement, which has been already
reached in principle for the cession to Germany of the
Sudeten German territory, have agreed on the following terms
and conditions governing the said cession and the measures
consequent thereon, and by this agreement they each hold
themselves responsible for the steps necessary to secure its
fulfillment:
(1) The evacuation will begin on 1st October.
(2) The United Kingdom, France and Italy agree that the
evacuation of the territory shall be completed by the 10th
October, without any existing installations having been
destroyed, and that the Czechoslovak Government will be held
responsible for carrying out the evacuation without damage
to the said installations.
(3) The conditions governing the evacuation will be
laid down in detail by an international commission composed
of representatives of Germany, the United Kingdom, France,
Italy and Czechoslovakia.
(4) The occupation by stages of the predominantly
German territory by German troops will begin on 1st October.
The four territories marked on the attached map will be
occupied by German troops in the following order:
The territory marked No. I on the 1st and 2nd of
October; the territory marked No. II on the 2nd and 3rd of
October; the territory marked No. III on the 3rd, 4th and
5th of October; the territory marked No. IV on the 6th and
7th of October. The remaining territory of preponderantly
German character will be ascertained by the
[9]
aforesaid international commission forthwith and be occupied
by German troops by the 10th of October.
(5) The international commission referred to in
paragraph 3 will determine the territories in which a
plebiscite is to be held. These territories will be occupied
by international bodies until the plebiscite has been
completed. The same commission will fix the conditions in
which the plebiscite is to be held, taking as a basis the
conditions of the Saar plebiscite. The commission will also
fix a date, not later than the end of November, on which the
plebiscite will be held.
(6) The final determination of the frontiers will be
carried out by the international commission. The commission
will also be entitled to recommend to the four Powers,
Germany, the United Kingdom, France and Italy, in certain
exceptional cases, minor modifications in the strictly
ethnographical determination of the zones which are to be
transferred without plebiscite
(7) There will be a right of option into and out of the
transferred territories, the option to be exercised within
six months from the date of this agreement. A German-
Czechoslovak commission shall determine the details of the
option, consider ways of facilitating the transfer of
population and settle questions of principle arising out of
the said transfer.
(8) The Czechoslovak Government will within a period of
four weeks from the date of this agreement release from
their military and police forces any Sudeten Germans who may
wish to be released, and the Czechoslovak Government will
within the same period release Sudeten German prisoners who
are serving terms of imprisonment for political offences.
Munich, September 29, 1938.
ADOLF HITLER,
NEVILLE
CHAMBERLAIN,
EDOUARD
DALADIER,
BENITO
MUSSOLINI.
g
No. 1
Annex to the Agreement
HIS MAJESTY's GOVERNMENT in the United Kingdom and the
French Government have entered into the above agreement on
the basis that they stand by the offer, contained in
paragraph 6 of the Anglo-French proposals of the 19th
September, relating to an international guar-
[10]
antee of the new boundaries of the Czechoslovak State
against unprovoked aggression.
When the question of the Polish and Hungarian
minorities in Czechoslovakia has been settled, Germany and
Italy for their part will give a guarantee to
Czechoslovakia.
Munich, September 29, 1938.
ADOLF HITLER,
NEVILLE
CHAMBERLAIN,
EDOUARD
DALADIER,
Benito
MUSSOLINI.
g
No. 2
Declaration
THE HEADS of the Governments of the four Powers declare
that the problems of the Polish and Hungarian minorities in
Czechoslovakia, if not settled within three months by
agreement between the respective Governments, shall form the
subject of another meeting of the Heads of the Governments
of the four Powers here present.
Munich, September 29, 1938.
ADOLF HITLER,
NEVILLE
CHAMBERLAIN,
EDOUARD
DALADIER,
Benito
MUSSOLINI.
g
No. 3
Supplementary Declaration
ALL questions which may arise out of the transfer of
the territory shall be considered as coming within the terms
of reference to the international commission.
Munich, September 29, 1938.
ADOLF HITLER,
NEVILLE
CHAMBERLAIN,
EDOUARD
DALADIER,
Benito
MUSSOLINI.
g
No. 4
Composition of the International
Commission
THE four Heads of Governments here present agree that
the international commission provided for in the agreement
signed by them to-day
[11]
shall consist of the Secretary of State in the German
Foreign Office, the British, French and Italian Ambassadors
accredited in Berlin, and a representative to be nominated
by the Government of Czechoslovakia.
Munich, September 29, 1938.
ADOLF HITLER,
NEVILLE
CHAMBERLAIN,
EDOUARD
DALADIER,
Benito
MUSSOLINI.
g
No. 13
M. EDOUARD DALADIER, President of the Council, Minister
of National
Defence and War,
to M. GEORGES BONNET, Minister for Foreign Affairs.
Munich, September 30,
1938, 330 a.m.
g
PLEASE transmit most urgently to Prague:
The text of the agreement which has been concluded to-
night by the four Powers in Munich has been communicated by
the British Prime Minister and M. Daladier to M. Mastny. The
latter will leave this morning at 6 a.m. by aeroplane for
Prague.
M. Ashton Gwatkin, who accompanies M. Mastny, will give
you, simultaneously with the French text of this document,
the attached map.
You should as a matter of extreme urgency get in touch
with M. Benes in order to make sure of his agreement. I
request you to express to him my deep emotion at the end of
these negotiations-and to assure him that it was not by my
choice that no representative of Czechoslovakia was present.
I have no doubt, however painful the sacrifices imposed by
the present situation, that M. Benes will agree with me that
it is of the highest importance, whilst safeguarding for the
future the essential conditions enabling his country to
retain its faith in its destiny, to save the Czechoslovak
nation from the more redoubtable trial of war.
No. 14
M. GEORGES BONNET, Minister for Foreign Affairs,
to M. V. DE LACROIX, French Minister in Prague.
Paris,
October 2, 1938.
g
PLEASE make an immediate communication to M. Krofta to
express the sentiments of profound sympathy with which, from
hour to hour,
[12]
I have followed his noble and courageous personal handling
of the situation during so painful a national trial. Please
assure him of the admiration felt by myself and by all my
countrymen for the strength of character and the
incomparable self-control shown by all Czechoslovak leaders,
whose clear-sightedness has done so much to protect their
country from the horrors of war. Will you assure him of my
most loyal personal friendship and of my desire to help him
to the best of my ability in the constructive task which now
lies before him. The dignity and the self-abnegation shown
by the entire Czechoslovak nation afford proof of its
reserves of strength and vitality, the best safeguard of her
historical patrimony and of her proud and free destiny.
GEORGES BONNET.
g
No. 15
M. GEORGES BONNET, Minister for Foreign Affairs,
to all diplomatic posts.
Paris,
October 3, 1938.
g
THE answer given on September 27 by Herr Hitler to the
personal message from Mr. Neville Chamberlain conveyed to
him in Berlin the day before by Sir Horace Wilson was not
such as to bring about a relaxation of the general tension.
Herr Hitler refused to make any concessions, and maintained
his decision to send his troops into the territory inhabited
by the Sudeten Germans on the 1st of October. Field-Marshal
Goering still further emphasized this attitude by declaring
to Sir Nevile Henderson on September 27 that, if the
Czechoslovak Government had not accepted the terms of the
Godesberg memorandum on the next day, September 28, by 2
p.m., measures of mobilization would immediately be taken
and followed by action.
In spite of this German intransigence, the French and
British Governments persevered in their efforts to find a
basis for a peaceful solution of the Czechoslovak question.
In the evening of September 27, Sir Nevile Henderson
presented to the German Government a new plan consisting
mainly of the occupation, on October 1, of the territories
of Eger and Asch.
This plan not having been accepted, the French
Ambassador immediately approached Herr Hitler himself,
during the morning of September 28, with another proposal
which, while conforming with the procedure contemplated in
the British plan, considerably enlarged the zone of
territory to be occupied by the Germans from the 1st of
October.
[13]
As a result of this conversation, which lasted a whole
hour and during the course of which the Chancellor had
behaved in a calm and almost friendly manner, our Ambassador
had the impression that it might not be impossible to reach
an agreement. Without rejecting the French proposal, Herr
Hitler reserved his reply with a view to a written
communication.
It was in these circumstances that, as a result of a
suggestion made by Mr. Neville Chamberlain in agreement with
the French Government after President Roosevelt's appeal,
and supported in Berlin by Signor Mussolini, Herr Hitler, in
the afternoon of the 28th September, invited the Heads of
the French, British and Italian Governments to meet on the
29th September at Munich.
After laborious negotiations, which began at midday on
September 29, an agreement was signed during the night of
the 29th-30th of September.
There is no need to summarize here the text of that
agreement, which was published on the 30th of September;
nevertheless, it seems useful to compare the principal
points of the agreement with the demands formulated by Herr
Hitler at Godesberg on the 23rd September.
(1) At Godesberg, the whole of the zone inhabited by
the Sudeten Germans was to have been ceded to Germany on the
1st October. At Munich it was agreed that this occupation
would take place by stages, being spread over a period of
ten days.
(2) At Godesberg, the new frontier was to be determined
by a unilateral decision of Germany alone. At Munich, an
international commission was to determine it finally.
(3) At Munich, Germany gave up the idea of the
plebiscite which had been insisted upon at Godesberg in the
zone inhabited by a strong majority of Sudeten Germans, no
doubt with the intention of creating a precedent which
Germany might invoke in other cases.
(4) At Godesberg, Herr Hitler had demanded the
organization of plebiscites in certain regions with a strong
Czech majority, but with German minorities. At Munich, he
abandoned this claim, leaving it to the international
commission to decide upon the advisability, and to determine
the territorial limits, of any plebiscites.
(5) At Munich, Germany conceded to the population the
right of option "to be included in the transferred
territories or to be excluded from them."
(6) Whilst, in the Godesberg plan, the German
Government would accept only one plenipotentiary
representing the Czechoslovak Govern-
[14]
ment and Army as agent de liaison with the German General
Staff, it has now agreed to the presence within the
international commission of a Czechoslovak representative on
an equal footing with the German representative.
(7) The German plan at Godesberg did not mention any
project of international guarantee. At Munich, Britain and
France have undertaken unconditionally and without delay to
participate in an international guarantee of the new
Czechoslovak frontiers against any unprovoked aggression;
Germany and Italy have undertaken to give their guarantee as
soon as the question of the Polish and Hungarian minorities
shall be settled.
(8) Taken as a whole, the Godesberg plan resembled in
many respects a veritable armistice convention concluded
after victorious military operations on the part of Germany;
the Munich agreement as the character of a settlement,
concluded under the guarantee of the four Powers, the
execution of which is essentially under the control and
even, in many cases, subject to the decision of an
international commission.
The Czechoslovak Government, with the highest self-
abnegation, and in a spirit to which we must pay tribute,
has accepted the agreement of the 29th September. All the
measures provided for in this agreement are now in course of
execution.
GEORGES BONNET.
g
No. 16
FRANOIS-PONCET, French Ambassador in Berlin,
to M. GEORGES BONNET, Minister for Foreign Affairs.
Berlin,
October 4, 1938.
g
THE agreement reached on September 29 at Munich has
been received with no less relief in Germany than in France
and Great Britain.
The Chancellor's speech delivered on September 26 and
the news of the military measures taken by France and Great
Britain had brought the prevailing anxiety to a high pitch.
The Chancellor had burnt his boats. It was felt to be
unthinkable that he could retreat. Contrary to general
expectations, the Western Powers appeared resolved to fight.
During the days of the 27th and 28th September, one could
sense the hourly approach of the catastrophe. This state of
mind was clearly visible in the expressions of the Berliners
who had been urged, during the evening of the 28th
September, to listen to a speech
[15]
by Dr. Goebbels, the general opinion was that he was to
announce general mobilization.
It was in this atmosphere that on Wednesday, towards 10
p.m., the news began to spread that the Four-Power
Conference was to open the next day at Munich. It
immediately aroused a feeling of immense satisfaction.
Nobody doubted for a moment that the imminent danger of war
had been averted. The miracle that all had ceased to hope
for had occurred.
With the exception of a few fanatics, very few Germans
thought that the Sudetens were worth the risk of a European
war. The great masses of the people knew nothing of the
Sudeten: they were in no way conscious that the Sudeten had
ever belonged to the Reich; they were hardly more interested
in their fate than in that of the Germans in Rumania. They
would have been quite pleased with a punitive expedition
against Czechoslovakia, but they certainly would have
abandoned the Sudeten rather than see the entire world in
arms against Germany.
At the moment when the German-Czech conflict threatened
to turn into a European conflagration, the atmosphere in
Germany was very different from the feverish and aggressive
atmosphere of August 1914. It is certainly without any
feeling of enthusiasm that the German people would have
followed their Fhrer into a general war
Though these are the general reactions brought about in
the country by the events of the last few days, it does not
appear that unanimity reigns in the leading circles of the
Reich as to the lesson to be learnt from them. In that
respect one can discern two separate schools of thought.
The more reasonable circles have been very much struck
by the resistance that the Fhrer's will has encountered for
the first time In the face of the attitude adopted by Great
Britain and France, and; at the last moment, even by Italy,
Adolf Hitler was not able to maintain in its entirety the
position he had assumed at Godesberg, and which was
formulated in his memorandum of September 23. He was
preparing to dictate terms to Czechoslovakia as to a
vanquished country. He had, with a unilateral gesture,
determined on a map the zone which German troops were to
occupy from the 1st of October The time allowed for
evacuation was so short that the Czechs could not have
retired in an orderly fashion. The Fhrer had to compromise
on all these points. Even though he has obtained
satisfaction on the main issues, he was obliged to accept an
international procedure as
[16]
regards the mode of execution, in spite of his repeatedly
expressed dislike of such methods. He was not able to go as
far as he wished. He recognized that he had reached the
limit beyond which foreign opposition threatened to become
armed intervention.
In German high political circles, and even among the
most convinced and influential Nazis, there is no lack of
counsels of moderation to the effect that the Germans should
be satisfied, for the time being at least, with the results
obtained, that they should allow themselves a respite, relax
the economic and financial tension, and seek to reach some
arrangement with the Western Powers. These are the circles
which, during the crisis of the 28th September, influenced
Field-Marshal Goering and whose counsels prevailed over Herr
von Ribbentrop's.
Yet there are many who proclaim that one must continue
to go ahead and to take the utmost advantage of the military
superiority which the Reich believes itself to possess at
present. Their influence is felt within the International
Commission itself, where they assume the attitude of victors
who have the right to formulate imperative demands. It has
been necessary more than once to remind them that the
agreement of September 29 was not a German "Diktat," but an
international arrangement. The annexation of the Sudeten,
following the Anschluss of Austria after an interval of
seven months, has not satisfied their appetites. At the very
moment when the German army is occupying the mountains which
have hitherto been the historic frontiers of Bohemia, they
are scanning the horizon in search of new demands to
formulate, new battles to fight out, new prizes to conquer.
Clearly anxious to spare the feelings of France and
Great Britain, to allay mistrust and awaken hopes, the
German Press has not ceased during these days to affirm that
the Munich Agreement might become the keystone for building
a new Europe released from prejudices and mutual hatreds,
ruled by respect for the vital rights of all peoples and
orientated towards a harmonious cooperation between the
nations. The newspapers of the Reich are prodigal in
expressions meant to please France. They have repeatedly
stated that no subject of contention now exists between
France and Germany. They have been at pains to pay tribute
to the role played by M. Daladier at the Munich conference;
they have praised him as an ax-serviceman whose chief
concern is to spare his country and Europe the horrors of a
new war. Quoting a remark of Field-Marshal Goering's, they
have written: "With a man like M. Daladier, politics become
a practical proposition."
[17]
Commenting on the declaration issued by the Fhrer and
the British Premier after the Munich conference-a
declaration which has been represented here as a non-
aggression pact-they have let it be understood that, in
their opinion, there is no reason why France and Germany
should not come to a similar arrangement. Evidently the
primary condition would be that France, adopting a realistic
policy, should draw certain conclusions from the events
which had so profoundly shaken the whole of Europe.
In that respect, the Munich conference should serve us
as a warning. In order that the agreement which assigns to
Czechoslovakia new frontiers and a new place in Europe
should become the starting-point of a reorganization of the
Continent on an equitable basis, it is indispensable that
the Western Democracies should draw a lesson from the
dramatic events of last week. It is necessary that while
continuing to affirm their will to peace and neglecting no
means of reaching an understanding with the totalitarian
States, they should nevertheless eliminate all causes of
internal weakness, that they should fill up as quickly as
possible any gaps in their armaments, and that they should
give to the outside world tangible proof of industry,
cohesion and strength. This is the price we must be prepared
to pay if Europe is not to undergo again, after a respite of
uncertain duration, crises similar to the last one just
settled at the Munich conference after threatening for
several days to degenerate into general pandemonium.
FRANOIS-PONCET.
[18]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.