Archive/File: orgs/american/ihr museum.ihr From oneb!cs.ubc.ca!destroyer!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!techbook.com!techbook.com!not-for-mail Wed Apr 21 22:25:53 PDT 1993 Article: 1994 of alt.revisionism Xref: oneb soc.history:11030 alt.censorship:9394 alt.activism:19698 alt.revisionism:1994 Path: oneb!cs.ubc.ca!destroyer!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!techbook.com!techbook.com!not-for-mail From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Dan Gannon) Newsgroups: soc.history,alt.censorship,alt.activism,alt.revisionism Subject: The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum: A Costly and Dangerous Mistake Date: 21 Apr 1993 07:52:02 -0700 Organization: TECHbooks Public Access Lines: 380 Message-ID: <email@example.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: techbook.techbook.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8] THE U.S. HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM: A COSTLY AND DANGEROUS MISTAKE by Theodore J. O'Keefe HARD BY THE WASHINGTON MONUMENT, within clear view of the Jefferson Memorial, an easy stroll down the Mall to the majestic Lincoln Memorial, has arisen, on some of the most hallowed territory of the United States of America, a costly and dangerous mistake. On ground where no monument yet marks countless sacrifices and unheralded achievements of Americans of all races and creeds in the building and defense of this nation, sits today a massive and costly edifice, devoted above all to a contentious and false version of the ordeal in Europe during World War II, of non-American members of a minority, sectarian group. Now, in the deceptive guise of tolerance, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum begins a propaganda campaign, financed through the unwitting largess of the American taxpayer, in the interests of Israel and its adherents in America. How did the federal government allow the creation of such a monstrosity? What is its meaning for American policy and for American values? And what must the American people do to regain control of the land their servants in Washington handed over to a foreign interest and to establish an enterprise thereon, whether a museum or otherwise, informed by and conducted according to American principles and interests? [Photograph captioned, "The five-story, $150 million US Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. was built and is operated by a taxpayer-funded federal agency. In the foreground is the museum's six-sided "Hall of Remembrance." ORIGINS In the late 1970s, during the presidency of James Earl "Jimmy" Carter, a propaganda campaign to promote the "Holocaust," the alleged systematic slaughter of some 6 million Jews by the Germans during World War II, was organized and carried out from Hollywood and New York. As Benjamin Meed, an important functionary of the council which controls the Holocaust museum, wrote in 1990: Almost a dozen years ago, a new phenomena [sic] developed. The Holocaust was introduced into schools, colleges, and universities. Television broadcast programs on the Holocaust and millions of Americans watched them. Soon, Americans took great interest in the lessons of the Holocaust, its uniqueness and its universal message.(1) Why the urgency of this campaign? Two factors were paramount: first, the beginnings, more than three decades after the end of World War II, of an objective scholarly assessment of the facts of the alleged German policy to exterminate European Jewry.(2) Second, the need to justify Zionist theory and practice in the face of unprecedented international resistance to Israeli intransigence (including the famous UN General Assembly Resolution which equated Zionism with racism), and to defend Israel's aggressive policy under the leadership of the former terrorist, Prime Minister Menachem Begin.(3) THE U.S. HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL COUNCIL In 1978 President Carter, his administration beleaguered at home and abroad, succumbed to pressure from the new "Holocaust" lobby (and thus America's influential Israel-first minority) by creating, through executive order, the President's Commission on the Holocaust. Two years later, on October 7, 1988, Congress passed--unanimously--a law establishing the United States Holocaust Memorial Council, charged principally with constructing and overseeing the operation of "a permanent living memorial to the victims of the holocaust" and with providing "for appropriate ways for the Nation to commemorate the Days of Remembrance, as an annual, national, civic commemoration of the Holocaust..."(4) A priceless tract of public land was turned over to the council, and, after years of costly delay (during which the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council's budget swelled from $2.5 million to over $18 million a year), the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum has been completed and readied for opening on April 22, 1993. A SECTARIAN, ALIEN AGENDA The Holocaust Memorial Council, besides soliciting tens of millions of dollars in tax-deductible donations to finance the Holocaust museum, has busied itself with promoting an agenda of unalloyed support for minority, Zionist ends. The membership of the council, a U.S. federal agency, has been overwhelmingly Jewish since its founding in 1980. The council's two different chairmen--Elie Wiesel and Harvey Meyerhoff--have both been committed to the support of the state of Israel, and the chairs of the council's most important committees have been likewise Jewish and Zionist. The chief fundraiser for the Holocaust museum, Miles Lerman, was formerly American vice chairman for the State of Israel Bonds Organization, promoting tax-free investment in a country which receives by far the largest amount of U.S. foreign aid per year. Working the same wealthy Jewish Americans he has long dealt with in his fundraising for Israel, Lerman has helped raise nearly $160 million in tax-deductible contributions. The biggest donors have been rewarded by having various components of the museum named for them, e.g. the Wexler Learning Center. Nor is erecting and operating the Holocaust Memorial Museum the only function with which the Holocaust Memorial Council has been charged. Another of its duties is to commemorate the Days of Remembrance for Victims of the Holocaust, which Congress has raised to "an annual, national, civic commemoration of the Holocaust." Like the Israeli Yom Hashoah (Day of the Holocaust), on which they are based, the Days of Remembrance are dated according to the lunar Hebrew calendar, and thus like Passover or Chanukah, fluctuate from year to year. These foreign days of lamentation are currently celebrated, under the flag of the republic, to prayers and chants in Hebrew, in governmental settings from the Capital Rotunda to city halls, across the land. Need it be stated that no group of American victims of persecution, let alone another foreign group, enjoys any such federally mandated and tax-supported day, or days, of recognition? THE HOLOCAUST MUSEUM'S ONE-SIDED "HISTORY" Although the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council during its early years made noises about recognizing the ordeals of non-Jews during World War II, by every indication from advance literature published by the council, the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum is relentlessly Judeocentric. While, according to a preliminary ground plan of the permanent exhibit, here and there are nods to non-Jewish groups oppressed by the German National Socialists (never to groups victimized by Germany's enemies, above all by Stalin's USSR), the larger holocaust of World War II, which claimed an estimated 75 to 80 million lives around the world, is ignored in preference to the Jewish ordeal. Thus, to cite just one telling example, the museum's "Life before the Holocaust" exhibit refers strictly to *Jewish* life before the Holocaust.(5) Where, in fact, non-Jews figure in the Museum, they figure largely as villains: the Germans and their allies and collaborators; the Western Allies, including America, who refused to accept a large immigration before the war; the American political and military leaders who refused to authorize costly bombing raids on the Auschwitz "gas chambers." RED LIBERATORS? The museum's message that support for Jews is the sole measure of decency during World War II leads to anomalies which, in an American museum raised on ground hallowed to the principles of liberty on which this republic is based, can only be called shocking. That the victims of World War II atrocities by the Allies--massacres such as the fire-bombing of Tokyo and Dresden, the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Soviet slaughter of their Polish prisoners at Katyn, the mass rapes carried out by the Red Army at the war's end--receive no mention is deplorable. But the museum's treatment of the armed forces which defended Stalin's savage Soviet tyranny is nothing short of grotesque. In the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, Communists appear only in the guise of "resistance fighters" and "liberators." For example, the submachine gun and false papers of Samuel Weissberg, a Communist Party member who rose to high rank in a Communist guerrilla group in North France, are on honored display, no less precious a relic than the standard heaps of shoes and hair, in the museum's permanent exhibit.(6) Even more unsettling is the honor given to Stalin's notorious Red Army, which compiled a bloody and shameful record of atrocities across Europe during, and after, the war. As the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council's newsletter fulsomely puts it, "Flags will hang in the museum to honor the millions of Soviet soldiers who drove Nazi forces westward and who were the first Allied forces to liberate and publicize the existence of the camps." In the words of Council chairman Harvey Meyerhoff, these martial banners of the Red tyranny have a single association: "Much more than simply wartime memorabilia, these military artifacts are a significant contribution to memory, one that will remind future generations of the pivotal role Soviet forces played in defeating Nazism..."(7) What must the millions of Americans originating or descending from the European nations--Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Bulgaria, [former] Yugoslavia-- for which the Red "military artifacts" symbolized invasion, tyranny, oppression and persecution of religion think as they see the fierce armies of *their* persecutors hailed as "liberators"? ISRAEL IN THE MUSEUM Just as one might guess from the circumstance that the museum's director, Yeshayahu Weinberg, and the head of its "Learning Center," Yechiam Halevy, were brought in from Israel, the museum's treatment of the state of Israel is adulatory. An emotive tribute to the founding of Israel is an integral part of the exhibition. That the establishment of Israel, and its expansion in subsequent wars, has meant colonial occupation and oppression for millions of the land's native Palestinians, and dispossession and exile for millions more, goes unmentioned--another grotesquery in an American museum supposed to instruct in the dangers of intolerance and disregard of human rights. As for the momentous collaboration between Hitler's German state and the Jewish Agency in the 1930s, which through the Ha'avara Agreement enabled the transfer of vital capital and the influx of tens of thousands of highly skilled Jewish immigrants to Palestine, that is passed over in utter silence.(8) "HISTORICAL CORRECTNESS" The Holocaust Museum's skewed history is not simply a matter of one- sidedness and omission. The museum has further committed itself to a fixed and final interpretation of the surprisingly scanty and sometimes suspect evidence for a German policy of annihilating European Jewry, largely in gas chambers, in numbers approaching 6 million. This despite a considerable body of research and scholarship that has arisen over the past two decades in many lands, and which contests, by academic means, the substance of the Holocaust "extermination thesis."(9) That the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council is aware of the work of the revisionists is clear: The council's literature is replete, not with substantive refutations of revisionist scholarship, but with slander and polemic. To cite one characteristic example, the _U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum Newsletter_ of May, 1992 featured a front-page attack on Holocaust revisionism by Professor Deborah Lipstadt of Occidental College in which the author decried the revisionists for producing material that looked scholarly, then lauded the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum as "among the most efficacious ways" of "combating this pernicious trend," *while neglecting to specify a single error of revisionist scholarship.*(10) The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council recognizes that there is a historical debate on the holocaust, but takes official notice of the dissenting position only to attack it. That an American institution, supported by the taxes of all Americans, should commit itself to inflexible historical orthodoxy--in the service of a single American minority--is an intolerable imposition on our First Amendment rights, as well as a mockery of the Western, and American, ideal of objective scholarship. A CENTER FOR EDUCATION? U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council Chairman Harvey Meyerhoff has stated: "The museum is primarily an educational institution."(11) From the council's own literature, however, it is clear what Meyerhoff means by education. The "role-playing" for children as well as adults who visit the museum (visitors are to be issued "identity cards" bearing the name and alleged fate of various Holocaust victims); the high-tech computer and video effects and the recordings of speech and music which augment the museum's tendentiously described artifacts; and the museum's goal, as proclaimed by its Zionist fundraising chairman, Miles Lerman, of ensuring that "Children in Dubuque, families in Tucson, and schoolteachers in Atlanta will learn the history and the lessons of Auschwitz as thoroughly as they learn the history of their own communities"--all these show that the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum is a *propaganda* enterprise that seeks to indoctrinate all Americans in a uniquely and partisanly Jewish (and Zionist) version of not merely the past, but the present and the future.(12) THE AMERICAN RESPONSE What is the American response to a partisan museum constructed in a place solemnly consecrated to the heroes and the values of our republic, to be lavishly operated with taxpayer dollars at a time when, even in our country's capital, thousands sleep homeless in the shadow of our national monuments? What is the American response to an ambitious propaganda agenda that aims to impose a sectarian "Holocaust remembrance" in schools where our children cannot pray, in town halls and federal buildings from which the religious symbols of the majority are banned in the name of freedom of worship? Over two centuries ago, Thomas Jefferson wrote: "To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical."(13) Nearly 150 years ago, Abraham Lincoln said: "I insist that if there is *anything* which it is the duty of the *whole people* to never entrust to any hands but their own, that thing is the preservation and perpetuity of their own liberties and institutions."(14) The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, and the council which runs it, as agencies of the government in which the American people is sovereign, must be removed from the special interest that now controls it. The scope and purpose of the Museum must be expanded, from its present one-sided emphasis on foreign Jewish sufferings, real and imagined, in Europe during the 1930s and 1940s to a compassionate yet realistic concern for *all* victims, but above all for *American* victims, of historic injustice. The Museum must be made a place where Americans of every heritage, and scholars of every viewpoint, may gather, educate, and be educated, without accusation and in the absence of propaganda. Until it is, the men and women who founded and built and suffered and fought and died for America, of every race, nationality and creed, will rest uneasy. NOTES 1. _The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Newsletter_ (Washington, D.C.), August, 1990, "Survivors Play Major Role in Establishing the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum," p.1. Meed is president of the American Gathering of Holocaust Survivors, and chairman of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council's Content and Days of Remembrance committees. 2. In l976, Prof. Arthur Butz's book _The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry_ was first published in England; in November of 1978 Prof. Robert Faurisson's article "The Problem of the Gas Chambers" was published in the Paris daily _Le Monde_. Butz has commented on the simultaneous and independent appearance of a variety of earlier academic criticisms of the wartime propaganda version of Jewry's ordeal in "The International Holocaust Controversy," _The Journal of Historical Review_, Spring, 1980, pp. 5-22. 3. By Resolution of the UN General Assembly on Novembe 10, 1975, Zionism was condemned as "a form of racism and racial discrimination." 4. Public Law 96-388, 1, October 7, 1980, 94 Stat. 1547. 5. Statements regarding the museum's permanent exhibit, except where otherwise noted, are derived from the floor plan and photographs in _United States Holocaust Memorial Museum_, a brochure published by the USHMC in Washington 1991. 6. _U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum Newsletter_, Sept., 1991, "French Resistance Fighter's Weapon Will Help Tell Story of Underground Movement." p.4 7. _U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum Newsletter_, fall. 1992, "Russian Embassy Presents Flags of Liberating Units to Museum," p.6. 8. For the most complete account of relations between the Nazis and the Zionists, see Francis Nicosia, _The Third Reich and the Palestine Question_, Austin: University of Texas, 1985 9. The most complete survey of holocaust revisionist writings to date is Carlo Mattogno's "The Myth of the Extermination of the Jews--Part II," in _The Journal of Historical Review_ (fall, 1988), pp. 261-302. 10. _U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum Newsletter_, May, 1992, "Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth," p.6. 11. _U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum Newsletter_, November, 1991, "Wexner Family donates $5 Million to Fund Interactive Learning Center," p.1. 12. The "identity cards" and other features of the museum are described in the brochure cited in note 5 above; Lerman's statement was included in a fundraising letter sent by the museum to potential Jewish contributors in 1991. 13. From "A Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom," 1779, in _Jefferson: Magnificent Populist_, edited by Martin Larson, Greenwich, Conn.: Devin-Adair, 1981. p.319. 14. "Speech at Peoria, Illinois." October 16, 1854, in _The American Intellectual Tradition_, Vol. 1, edited by David Hollinger and Charles Capper, New York: Oxford University Press, 1989, p. 382. ___________________________________________________________________________ Theodore J. O'Keefe is an editor with the Institute for Historical Review. Educated at Harvard University, he has studied history and literature on three continents, and has published numerous articles on historical and political subjects. ___________________________________________________________________________ The IHR publishes numerous revisionist books, tapes and other materials, as well as the bi-monthly _Journal of Historical Review_. Send $2 for a complete catalog and selection of literature. More copies of this leaflet are available, postpaid, at the following prices: 10 copies, $2 50 copies, $5 100 copies or more, 8 cents each INSTITUTE FOR HISTORICAL REVIEW P.O. Box 2739 Newport Beach, CA 92659 -=End -Dan Gannon -- dgannon@techbook.COM Public Access User --- Not affiliated with TECHbooks Public Access UNIX and Internet at (503) 220-0636 (1200/2400, N81) From oneb!cs.ubc.ca!utcsri!utnut!torn!howland.reston.ans.net!noc.near.net!das-news.harvard.edu!das-news!smith Thu Apr 22 07:18:30 PDT 1993 firstname.lastname@example.org (Dan Gannon) writes: > THE U.S. HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM: A COSTLY AND DANGEROUS MISTAKE > > by Theodore J. O'Keefe > > [Holocaust revisionism] > > Theodore J. O'Keefe is an editor with the Institute for Historical > Review. Educated at Harvard University . . . According to the 1990 Harvard Alumni Directory, Mr. O'Keefe failed to graduate. You may decide for yourselves if he was indeed educated anywhere. Steven Smith
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
Home · Site Map · What's New? · Search Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012