The Nizkor Project: Remembering the Holocaust (Shoah)

Shofar FTP Archive File: imt/tgmwc/tgmwc-13//tgmwc-13-119.06

Archive/File: imt/tgmwc/tgmwc-13/tgmwc-13-119.06
Last-Modified: 2000/02/13


Q. I remind you that in 1935, the delegate of the Labour
Party, Alan Hartwood -

THE PRESIDENT: The Tribunal thinks that you ought to put the
question in the general way in which I put it to you and not
go into the details of each visit or the details of each
number of visits.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: If your Honour please, I want to object
to it as generalities because it already appears that the
United States did not participate in this, and I tried to
keep the European politics out of this case, and this is the
thin end of the wedge. Now, I don't want to get into this
sort of thing. I think it is entirely irrelevant that some
foreigner, deceived by the appearance which the defendant
Schacht was assisting in putting up, didn't start opposition
earlier. This thing is entirely irrelevant. The United
States has desired to keep this sort of thing out of this
case because it is endless if we go into it. It seems to me,
if Herr Schacht wants to put the responsibility for his
conduct on some foreigner, that foreigner should be named.
He has already said that the United States representatives,
Mr. Messersmith and Mr. Dodd, had no part in it because they
were always against the regime. Now, it gets into a
situation here which seems to me impossible before this
Tribunal and I cannot understand how it constituted any
defence for mitigation for Schacht to show that the foreign
powers maintained intercourse with Germany, even at a period
of its degeneration.

THE PRESIDENT: The Tribunal thinks the question is relevant
but should be put without detail.

DR. DIX: I will put the question without detail, and I would
like to say that I cannot, of course, compare myself to
America, but I, too, am trying to avoid foreign politics.
However, my question does not concern foreign politics.


Q. Here is one question: What influence did the honours,
which were showered upon the Nazi regime by foreign
countries in a manner well-known to you, have on the work of
your group of conspirators?

A. Throughout the years from 1935, up to and including 1938,
numerous statesmen from almost all other nations came to
Berlin to visit Hitler, including some crowned heads. From
America, for instance, there was Under Secretary of State

Q. Do not mention any names.

A. I said that only because names were expressly mentioned
here. It is not limited to Europe. I do not intend to make
any political explanations, I merely say that there were so
many visitors which meant not only recognition, but
distinction for Hitler, so that he appeared a very great man
in the eyes of the German people. I still remember that in
1925, I believe, the King of Afghanistan, Amanulla, appeared
in Berlin. He was the first foreigner to visit the Social
Democratic Government, and there was a celebration because
at last a great man from another country visited us. In
Hitler's case, starting with 1935 there was one visitor
after another, and Hitler went from one foreign political
success to

                                                   [Page 23]

another, which made it extremely difficult to enlighten the
German people and made it impossible to work along those
lines within the German nation.

Q. And now, two final questions.

You have heard the speech by the British Chief Prosecutor,
Sir Hartley Shawcross, who said that there should have been
a point where the servants of Hitler ought to have refused
to follow him. We want to accept that point of view, and I
ask you: Do you believe that you yourself acted in accord
with that postulate of the Chief of the British Delegation?

A. I not only accept it, but I fully approve of it. From the
very moment when I recognized what a harmful individual
Hitler was, what a threat to world peace, I broke all ties
with him, not only secretly, but publicly and personally.

Q. So you are of the opinion that when you realised the
truth you did everything humanly possible to try to save
humanity from the disaster of this war, and bring it to an
end once it had started.

A. I know of no one in Germany who would have done more in
that respect than I did. I warned against excessive
armament. I impeded, and if you like, sabotaged effective
armament through my economic policy. I resigned from the
Ministry of Economy against the will of Hitler; I publicly
protested to Hitler against all the abuses of the Party; I
continuously warned people abroad and gave them information;
I attempted to influence the policy of other nations with
respect to the colonial question in order to achieve a more
peaceful atmosphere. Credits for continued armaments -

THE PRESIDENT: I think we have heard this more than once,
you know.

DR. DIX: Yes.

THE WITNESS: May I be permitted one sentence: I blocked
Hitler's credits and I finally tried to remove him.

DR. DIX: Gentlemen, I am now at the end of my presentation
of evidence for Schacht, and I have only one request. During
the last few days, I have received a large number of letters
and also affidavits from well-known people who knew Schacht.
I will examine them, and if I should decide that any of the
affidavits are relevant, I will get in touch with the
prosecution and discuss with them whether they have any
objection to having them translated so that, perhaps, we can
submit them to the Tribunal, not to have them read, but
merely to have them put in evidence. May I request that I be
granted this right? At the end of my entire presentation, I
will briefly submit my documents, this has been done only

THE PRESIDENT: Do any of the other defendants' counsel wish
to ask any questions?

DR. VON LUEDINGHAUSEN (Counsel for defendant von Neurath): I
have only a few questions to Dr. Schacht.


Q. How long have you known Herr von Neurath, Dr. Schacht?

A. I can not state the exact year, but at any rate for a
very long time, for many, many years.

Q. For some time, for about four years, you were both
Ministers in the government. During that time, did you have
any contact with him other than in a purely official

A. Unfortunately not enough, but of course I saw him from
time to time. I would have liked to have seen him more

Q. But from conversations with him, or from what you heard
about him, you certainly formed an opinion about his
political views.

A. I was well acquainted with his views.

Q. And what was the trend of his political thought?

                                                   [Page 24]

A. I had the impression that, basically, von Neurath
believed in a conservative policy, but could be convinced in
favour of progressive measures. He was, above all, in favour
of peaceful international co-operation.

Q. Do you consider it possible, or do you have any reason to
believe, that under certain circumstances he would also
resort to belligerent methods or that he would even consider
them, if the peaceful understanding which he desired was
quite impossible?

A. According to my understanding of Neurath, I think that he
was entirely averse to any aggressive policy.

Q. You witnessed the various -

THE PRESIDENT: (Interposing) Dr. Luedinghausen, will you
kindly put the earphones on; the Tribunal thinks these
questions are not questions which can properly be put
because of their general nature.

Q. Did you have the impression that in everything that he
achieved, particularly in the occupation of the Rhineland,
Neurath -

THE PRESIDENT (Interposing): Dr. Luedinghausen, this is not
a proper question to put to a witness, "Did you have an
impression about him?" You can ask him what he said and what
he did; what did von Neurath do and what did he say?

DR. VON LUEDINGHAUSEN: Yes, then, I will not put this
question. I have only one last question.


Q. You know that, on the 4th of February, 1938, von Neurath
resigned as Foreign Minister. What did you and your
immediate circle say to the resignation of von Neurath from
foreign politics? What impression did it make upon you?

A. I believe I have already said, in the course of the
interrogation, that I considered von Neurath's resignation a
very bad sign for it meant departing from the previous
policy of understanding in foreign politics.

DR. VON LUEDINGHAUSEN: I have no further questions.

THE PRESIDENT: Any other defendants' counsel want to ask

Does the prosecution desire to cross-examine?

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: I think it might save time, your
Honour, if we could take our recess at this time. It is a
little early, I know, but it takes some time to arrange our


(A recess was taken.)



Q. Dr. Schacht, according to the transcript of the
testimony, at Page 401, Part 12, you said that in 1938 you
told a certain lady while you were dining, "My dear lady, we
have fallen into the hands of criminals. How could I ever
have suspected that!" You recall that testimony?

A. It was not I who gave that testimony; it came from an
affidavit submitted here by my defence Counsel, but it is

Q. I am sure you want to help the Tribunal by telling us who
those criminals were.

A. Hitler and his confederates.

Q. Well, you were there; you knew who the confederates were.
I am asking you to name all that you put in that category of
criminals with Hitler. Hitler, you know, is dead.

                                                   [Page 25]

A. Mr. Justice Jackson, it is very difficult for me to
answer that question fully because I do not know who was in
that close conspiracy with Hitler. The defendant Goering has
told us here that he considers himself one of that group.
There were Himmler and Bormann, but I do not know who else
there was in the small circle of men who were trusted by

Q. You have only named three men. Let me put it this way,
you named four men as criminals, three of whom are dead and
one of whom you say admitted -

A. I can add one more, if you will permit me. I assume that
the Foreign Minister von Ribbentrop was also always
acquainted with Hitler's plans. I must assume that, I cannot
prove it.

Q. Whom else did you include when you were talking to the

A. On that evening I did not mention any names.

Q. But whom did you have in mind? You surely were not making
charges against your own people, who were in charge of your
own Government, without having definite names in mind.

A. I have taken the liberty of mentioning the names to you.

Q. Are those all?

A. I don't know, but I assume that there were more. I would
add without hesitation, Heydrich. But I cannot know with
whom -

Q. Heydrich is a dead man.

A. I regret that these people are dead, I would have liked
to see them die some other way; but -

Q. Well, are those the only people that you included?

A. I have no proof of the fact that there was anyone else in
this conspiracy about whom I could say that there is proof
that he was a conspirator.

Q. Now, Dr. Schacht, at the time the Nazis seized power you
had a world-wide acquaintance, and very great standing, as a
leading banker in Germany and in the world, did you not?

A. I do not know whether that is so, but if that is your
opinion I do not wish to contradict you.

Q. Well, at least you would admit that? Wouldn't you?

A. I do not contradict.

Q. And yet as we understand it, you made public appearances
in Germany before the German people in support of the Nazi
regime, alongside of characters such as Streicher and

A. Mr. Justice Jackson, I have taken the liberty to explain
here that until July, 1932, I did not in any way come
forward publicly for Hitler or the Party and that, on the
contrary, in America, for instance, I warned the people
against Hitler. At that time I ... the name Bormann was, of
course, unknown to me at the time, and Streicher's paper Der
Sturmer, was just as revolting to me before that time as
afterwards. I did not think that I had anything in common
with Herr Streicher.

Q. Well, I didn't either, but that is why I wondered about
your appearing with him publicly before the German people
after 1933, when the Nazi regime was consolidating its
power. You did that, didn't you?

A. (something not heard). What did I do, Mr. justice

Q. I spoke of your appearances, publicly, before the German
people with Streicher and Bormann in support of the Nazi
programme after the seizure of power.

A. I do not think so. I was never seen publicly with Herr
Streicher or Herr Bormann - certainly not at that time. It
is quite possible that he attended the same Party rallies as
I, or that I sat next to him, but at any rate in 1933 I was
never seen publicly either with Streicher or with Bormann.

Q. I'll ask to have you shown the photograph from the
Hoffmann collection, marked No. 10. You have no difficulty
recognising yourself in that, do you?

A. No.

                                                   [Page 26]

Q. And on the right sits Bormann?

A. Yes.

Q. And next to him the Minister of Labour?

A. Yes.
Q. And on the other side of you is Hitler?

A. Yes.

Q. And beyond him, Streicher?

A. I do not recognize him; I don't know whether it is
Streicher, but perhaps it is.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: Well, I will offer the photograph in
evidence. And perhaps the identification will be sufficient.

Q. And also Frick is in that picture?

A. Yes.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: This becomes Exhibit USA 829.

Q. I will ask to have you shown -

THE PRESIDENT: Mr. Justice Jackson, what is the date of that

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: There is no date given on the
photographs. Perhaps the witness can tell us.

Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor

© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012

This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and to combat hatred. Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.

As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.