Archive/File: imt/nca/nca-06/nca-06-C-2.02
Last-Modied: 1999/12/14
II. THE OPPONENT'S VIOLATIONS
(a) Incidents (b) Example (c) Attitude of the International Law
Group
(1) Judgment by (2) Justification
International Law by the laws of
warfare
(1) Bombing or Judgment by If it is at all
shelling attacks International Law possible, claim
on localities as in Section I, that the enemy
where there are (1a) In an air No. 1, c 1. carried out
no military raid on Berlin, deliberate
installations. the French precision bombing
(a) Bombing of Embassy is and what is
extra-territorial destroyes specially to be
buildings and condemned is that
areas. the French
Embassy contains
valuable art
treasures and
that subjects of
enemy states are
staying there,
having found
asylum there.
Moreover, that
the French
Embassy made
efforts to avert
the conflict.
(2) Injuring or American Subjects of It will be
killing of subjects are neutral states difficult to
subjects of injured or outside the actual prove that the
neutral states killed in an air war zone are enemy did this
outside the raid on Dresden. protected by with intent. The
actual zone. International Law. only other
possible
assertion is that
as the buildings
and persons were
clearly
distinguishable
by the
indications of
American
territory, or
white flags,
there was no
excuse for
attacking them.
There were no
military
objectives near
the scene of the
onslaught.
[Page 809]
(3) Bombing and (3) In an air Judgment by Accuse the enemy
shelling attacks raid on Vienna, International Law of having
aon hospitals, hospitals are as in Section I, violated Art. 27
military destroyed and No. 3, c 1. of the Hague
hospitals, Red Cross Rules for Land
churches and personnel and Warfare by
cultural patients killed. omitting to
monuments. provide suitable
for the
protection of the
hospitals in
Vienna which by
day and night
were marked
sufficiently
distinctly by the
Red Cross. In
this case, also,
the intention of
precision bombing
must be imputed
as much as
possible.
(4) Destruction (4) Detonators Prohibition of Such destruction
of villages, are placed in international law as the blowing up
settlements, the Aussig Dam exists only with of the Aussig Dam
agricultural in order to regard to the can only be
areas, industrial destroy the destruction and branded as the
and surrounding area removal of enemy most inhuman,
communications and the property, other senseless, and
installations inhabitants by than in those useless method of
which serve no flooding. cases where this taking revenge on
military purpose. destruction or innocent people.
removal is made Compare similar
urgent by the cases of barbaric
necessitites of action in the
war (Art. 23g of Hussite Wars and
the Hague Rules in the behavior
for Land Warfare). of the Czech
Legion in
Siberia,
1918/1920.
(5) Use of war When Czech Judgment by Making wells
weapons which can troops withdrew International Law unfit for use by
be employed under from the Sudeten as in Section II, throwing in
certain - German area, par 5, C 1. stable manure,
conditions and of wells in many for example, is
new types of war places are an authorized
weapons such as contaminated. means of war.
gas, flame- International Law
throwers, forbids only the
chemical warfare poisoning of
agents and wells.
bacteriological Contamination by
substances. bacteria, on
which this
example is
apparently based,
is forbidden by
International Law
both in the Hague
Ruling for Land
Warfare and in
the Convention of
1925. A
propaganda attack
is therefore
justified.
(6) Underhand In Postelberg, Underhand means of The enemy must be
means of waging Czech trucks and warfare as, for accused of
war: continuing locomotives have example, feigning employing
the fight after been camouflaged death and shooting unchivalrous
the enemy has by German from the rear at means of warfare,
apparently National advancing troops, and he will gain
surrendered - markings and showing white little advantage
camouflage by swastikas. flags and firing by means which
abuse of German with hidden are dishonorable
or neutral machine guns on and repugnant to
national the approach of an honest
markings. the unsuspecting soldier.
enemy justify
immeidate
reprisals without
mercy. The misuse
of the flag of
truce, they
national flag or
of the military
badges or uniforms
of the opponent or
of the Red Cross
is forbidden (Art.
23e, Hague Rules
for Land Warfare)
but it becomes
misuse only if
enemy operations
are undertaken
under the
camouflage; these
enemy operations
also justify
immediate reprisal
measures. The
camouflaging of
Czech trucks and
locomotives by
German national
markings and
swastikas is not
contrary to
international law.
It becomes
contrary thereto
only if they are
employed in enemy
operations, under
this camouflage.
(7) Maiming or When being taken Killing or In this case,
killing of into the Eger injuring one's own propaganda can
wounded, hospital, a subjects does not only be directed
prisoners, serious injured come under the once more against
defenseless Sudeten-German judgment of Czech brutality
persons, women motor cyclist is international law. in general. In
and children. shot by Czech Killing or addition, it must
soldiers, who injuring of be stressed that
said: "The defenseless those injured and
German swine persons, wounded killed were
will die and prisoners of subjects who
anyway." enemy nationality belonged to Czech
is expressly state only
forbidden by because they were
International Law. forced to and
whose return to
the Reich had
already been
promised.
(8) Use of German prisoners Judgment by Discretion must
prisoners of war of war are International Law be used in
for war work employed under as in Section I, reproaches of
(road guard as truck para. 8, C 1. this kind, for it
contruction, drivers for is possible that
digging trenches, transferring similar
production of back raw accusaitons could
munitions, materials of be made against
employment in war. us by the
transport opponent if the
service, etc.). fact is to be
made use of for
propaganda
purposes.
All that can be
asserted is that
our prisoners
were employed by
the opponent for
transporting
munitions behind
their front
lines.
(10) Compulsory Members of the a judgment from Also, all that
evacuation of Polish minority the standpoint of can be referred
national are compulsorily International Law to in propaganda
minorities from evacuated to the does not come into are Czech acts of
their homes, and interior of the the question. brutality.
confiscating country in
their food military
stuffs, fodder transports.
and live-stock,
etc.
[Page 813]
(11) Measures for In localities on Measures for In this case it
inciting, arming, the Czech- inciting one's own would be
and taking Silesian subjects, for appropriate to
control of the frontier summons arming and give warnings
civilian to fight German conducting referring to the
population (Franc-troops are guerilla warfare, civilian warfare
tireur warfare). issued, and arms are allowed. The of August 1914 in
distributed to national warning Belgium, which
the civilian itself, must not caused the death
population. exceed the limits of thousands of
prescribed by inhabitants.
International Law Cunning snipers
(Art. 1 and 2 of without uniform
the Hague Rules and soldiers in
for Land Warfare), civilian clothes,
i.e., prescribed after pretending
badges to be
recognizable at a acquiescent,
distance, bearing attacked soldiers
arms openly, etc. on the march and
in their billets
and provoked the
reprisals
justified by such
actions. For use
in propaganda, it
must be
particularly
stressed that the
above-named
conditions
justifying a
national uprising
were not
fulfilled and the
outward
identification
marks of armed
civilians were
lacking.
(12) Violation of Czech airmen It is contrary to The violation of
neutral drop bombs on International Law the neutrality of
territorial the German- for combat Polish territory
rights by flying Polish frontier, aircraft to fly and the
over or bombing destroying the over the destruction of
it. town hall in territories of non-military
Lissa and a neutral power. buildings of
church in which the church
Rawitsch. in Rawitsch is
specially
protected by
International Law
constitute a
serious breach of
International Law
which must be
correspondingly
used to the full
in propaganda. In
addition, it is
necessary to
point out that it
was obviously a
deliberate air
raid.
(13) Slanderous The Melnick Making the enemy Remedy in this
propaganda by Radio Station contemptible is a case is possible
false reports on spreads reports stratagem of war only by
the measures of that dum-dum allowed by correcting the
the German projectiles have international law, reports, and
command and on been used by even if in so better still by
the combat German troops. doing many lies counter-attack,
elements, by Polish and in which, of
accounts of newspapers show misrepresentations course, we can
atrocities in false are made. The also make use of
press reports, photographs of efforts made by the spreading of
news picture this. different powers, atrocity stories.
broadcasts, etc. Germany amongst Nothing more can
them, to form and be done than to
international attempt to beat
agreement to the opponent at
restrict the his own game or
propaganda of war get equal with
atrocities failed him in some way
in 1932. or other.
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.