From email@example.com Sun Sep 8 08:20:54 PDT 1996 Article: 63449 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!nntp.teleport.com!news.serv.net!news.cstone.net!newshost.cyberramp.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sgi.com!enews.sgi.com!decwrl!tribune.usask.ca!news.uregina.ca!mongol.sasknet.sk.ca!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news From: firstname.lastname@example.org (John Morris) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Ceacaa's Honor (was: Re: Pellets, shower, porous pillars...) Date: Sat, 07 Sep 1996 22:03:45 GMT Organization: University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada Lines: 71 Message-ID: <email@example.com> References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: async10-4.remote.ualberta.ca X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99e/32.227 firstname.lastname@example.org (Ceacaa) wrote: [It's slab of concrete, dammit! Don't you understand? Are you blind? Concrete! It proves there was no Holocaust! Why can't you see that!?] And also wrote: >I would also like to inquire if you are still willing to >travel to Auschwitz/Birkenau to investigate some of >the questions which have arisen on this thread? John >Morris was unable to complete his promised task. >I hope that we could raise the cost of travelling >expenses on this thread. Please post reply. Golly, I stick my nose back into alt.revisionism for two seconds, and what do I find? Andrew Allen still beating a horse that is not only long dead, but thoroughly putrefied. And still lying about me. In another message, Mr. Allen called me "craven" for not going the Birkenau at his behest this summer. Now I have to wonder who is "craven," since he accuses me publicly of failing to keep a promise I never made, and since he does not do me the courtesy of cc'ing me with his accusations. It should be apparent after my long absence that I am no longer a regular participant in alt.revisionism. How easy it is to lie behind someone's back. How "courageous" of our Revisionist friend. And how will this gutless wonder Andrew Allen respond to my annoyance that he is lying about me again? The same way as last time he got caught: he will say nothing. Meanwhile, it is beyond me how anyone in their right mind could insist for nine months running on the importance of the state of the gas chamber roof at Birkenau Krema and never quite get around to saying why it is all so important. Does it really matter whether the roof had tar paper on it? If there was or was not tar paper, would it have made a difference to the tens of thousands murdered underneath that roof? Does it make a difference now? Does it really make any difference if the roof slab is fully intact if most of it is obscured beneath tons of rubble? There is certainly enough roof there to talk about. But Mr. Allen has, in any case, not made the kind of examination that he insists that others make: the McCalden Expedition was just a very tasteless joke. No, Mr. Allen is not ever going to tell us his remarkable theory of how the mere fact of the existence of the L.Keller roof proves that there was no Holocaust. Rather, he is content to carry on peeing in the sandbox about how the other kids won't help him make his sandcastle. I suspect that Mr. Allen is also loath to put forward his theory. After all, in his previous attempt to explain this "self-evident" roof slab, he asserted that holes had been cut through concrete and rebar in order to vent the destructive force of the demolition charges, a claim almost as absurd as his claim that the presence of human remains in a huge mass grave at Treblinka proved there were no killings there on the grounds that the witnesses said that the corpses were destroyed utterly by cremation. Yes, gentle reader, Mr. Allen really *does* indeed say such abysmally stupid things! Please visit the crypto-Nazi IHR web site if you have a taste for more of Mr. Allen's cogent analyses. As for myself, I would submit to the general readership the merely obvious that Andrew Allen is a crackpot with a crank theory and without the intellectual equipment even to articulate his theory.
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
Home · Site Map · What's New? · Search Nizkor