Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Holocaust Almanac: Theresienstadt
Summary:
Reply-To: kmcvay@nizkornospam.org
Followup-To: alt.revisionism
Organization: The Nizkor Project http://www.nizkor.org
Keywords: theresienstadt
Archive/File: camps/theresienstadt/theresien.03
Last-Modified: 1994/09/20
"Karl Hermann Frank, also present at the conversation, suggested
the names of various cities that might server their purpose, and
finally the name Thersienstadt (Terezin) was mentioned: a military
fortress dating from the eighteenth century, less than forty miles
from Prague. Eichmann was not familiar with the site, and he went
to take a look at it. He found it unsuitable, he said, because it
was too small (the fortress walls permitted the construction of an
inner city of only 500 to 700 meters square). However, Terezin did
have other advantages: the barracks were suitable for mass
residences, the city walls and fortress easily insured isolation
from the outside world, and no great guard force would be
necessary.
Department G of the Jewish community now started work at full speed
(without being told anything about Terezin), and its first
conclusion was that it was impossible to settle all the Jews of the
Protectorate in a single city. Should the order be given
nonetheless, the problem could be solved by erecting either one
large camp of shacks or several smaller ones. For this purpose,
1,300 shacks would be required, and their construction, together
with vital sanitary facilities, would cost 195 million crowns and
necessitate a considerable quantity of building materials.
From the wording of the report, dated October 9, it was clear that
Department G did not view the idea of a shack camp with equanimity:
a relatively large number of Jews had been placed in jobs geared
to the German economy, especially recently, and would now have to
be taken out of the production line. In addition, non-Jewish labor
would have to be used for work for which there was not enough
skilled Jewish labor available. Furthermore, hastily erected shack
camps tended to fall short of even the most primitive housing sites
within existing settlements, and increased the danger of
epidemics." (Bondy, 228-9)
"Edelstein send Franta Friedmann (who, because he was married to a
non-Jew, enjoyed greater freedom of movement) to take a look at
Theresienstadt, or Terezin as it was called by the Czechs. The
inital report has hardly encouraging: the city was located near the
point where the Eger poured into the Elbe, and the level of
undergound water beneath the fortress was relatively high. Beneath
the outside walls, behind stone walls several yards thick, were
subterranean cellars with only small apertures for light, and
apparently very damp. The army had not used them for living
quarters in over twenty years. Northeast of the town, where the
river overflowed, was the small fortress whose dungeons had in days
gone by served as a prison, and were considered a health hazard
even under the monarchy. What the report did not say was that with
the onset of the German occupation, the small fortress had reverted
to its former purpose: it was the Gestapo's central prison, a
substitute for concentration camps, and those who entered it were
rarely seen alive again.
As might be expected, the reservations the Jews had about the place
made no impression on the Germans: as far as they were concerned,
it had all been decided. At the end of October, Siegfried Seidl, a
thirty-year-old Austrian national and a member of the National
Socialist Party for ten years, who had proved his ability during
the transportation of Jews from Warte-Gau to Poland in 1939, was
appointed commandant of the future ghetto. According to the
instructions about his appointment (received from Eichmann and
signed by Heydrich), Seidl reported to Gu"nther in Prague and the
next day left for Terezin to discuss the Wehrmacht's evacuation of
the barracks with the commander of the garrison army (the small
fortress was to remain under the exclusive jurisdiction of the
security police and used as its prison). After Seidl saw the place,
he voiced his opposition to the Zentralstelle's proposal that
eighty thousand Jews be concentrated in the ghetto. Maximum
capacity, he felt, could not exceed thirty thousand.
'The ghetto is a sealed-off Jewish sttlement established by order
of the Center for Jewish Emigation in Prague, and run by the Jewish
administration under the supervision of the German authorities'
local command. At the head of the ghetto is a Council of Elders and
an advisory board consisting of between fifty and one hundred
people, representatives of the various productive and consumer
branches, a fairly representative cross section of the ghetto
population. The appointment and deposition of the ghetto
administrator and his deputy are in the hands of the
Zentralstelle.' So ran the guidelines for ghetto regulations, drawn
up by Department G at the beginning of November. The Germans had
the leaders of the Prague community submit two tentative lists of
the composition of the Council of Elders in the ghetto, one
consisting of Czech Jews, the other of Zionists. Weidmann and
Edelstein agreed between them to include unaffilated experts in
both lists, so that all the Jews would have some representation on
the future council. The Germans chose Edelstein's list, and so, at
the age of thirty-eight, Jakob Edelstein led the Jews of Bohemia
and Moravia on their road to the unknown." (Ibid, 238-40)
Work Cited
Bondy, Ruth. Elder of the Jews. New York: Grove Press, 1989.
(Translated from "Edelshtain neged had-zeman". Zmora, Bitan,
Modan, publishers, 1981
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.