Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Holocaust Almanac: Theresienstadt & The Danish Red Cross
Summary: Himmler sets the stage for a visit by the Danish Red Cross,
creating what amounted to a movie set in order to make the
camp appear benign.
Followup-To: alt.revisionism
Keywords: theresienstadt
Archive/File: holocaust/czechoslovakia/theresienstadt theresien.10
Last-Modified: 1994/09/28
"In May 1944, following repeated appeals from the Danish Red Cross,
which above all wanted to see how its compatriots were being
treated, Himmler finally agreed to permit a commission of the
International Red Cross to visit Theresienstadt and a Jewish labor
camp. The visit to the ghetto was set for June 23.
Three days before the commission's visit, all the Danish Jews were
transferred to small rooms with two or three beds, pretty
bed-spreads, a table, chairs, a pot with a real plant, and on the
door a nameplate with the tenants' names. In the presence of the
camp commandant and Eichmann's emissary, Mo"hs, Epstein, the Elder
of the Jews, spoke to the Danes and warned them not to tell the
truth. Those Danes for whom better rooms could not be found were
locked up in the offices of the Magdeburg barracks for the duration
of the visit, so that the commission would not bump into them.
In the interest of the grand display, Eichmann permitted the
rescue committee in Budapest to officially transfer $10,000 to the
Protectorate Jews. The ghetto leadership received new stationery
headed by an idyllic scene of Theresienstadt, and the leaders of
the Zionist movement - Kahn, Munk, Zucker, Epstein, O"sterreicher -
wrote letters to Joel Brand in Budapest thanking him for the many
shipments of packages from Lisbon and Istanbul: 'Our food supply is
totally adequate and there is no need whatsoever for you to worry
about it, but we are glad of the packages as a sign of your
friendship.'
The letter stated further that 'Theresienstadt is in all respects a
Jewish city; all the work is done by Jews, from street cleaning to
the most advanced medical treatment, from all technical work to
cooking in the communal kitchens, from manning the fire brigade and
police force to staffing the legal system and postal service, from
running a bank with its own currency to organizaing cultural
programs, lectures, plays, concerts, a library with 50,000 volumes,
children's houses, old-age residences. The good general state of
health is in no small part due to Theresienstadt's excellent
climate, but also to the doctors' tireless efforts and the regular
supply of medicine. We sometimes think of friends and the
possibility of immigration. As we see from your letter, you too
hope to achieve this solution, and not on a small scale.'
Franta Friedmann, the Elder of the Jews in Prague, where only
half-Jews and a handful of Jews of mixed marriages remained, sent a
letter that same week in the same saccharine-sweet tone. He too
told of the rich and proud Jewish life in the ghetto, despite the
fact that he had never been permitted to visit Theresienstadt. The
similarity in content and date showed that both letters had been
written on instructions from above.
The Germans spared no Jewish money, effort, or manpower to improve
Theresienstadt's image. A modern children's home was built of wood
and glass, with new beds, adjoining showers, and a playground with
a swimming pool. A villa, til now occupied by one of the German
citizens, became the (temporary) infirmary for sick children.
Painted signs were hung in the streets. The residences along the
route mapped out for the commission were literally white-washed to
cover up all telltale signs of grime visible at a superficial
glance. The bank director's office was furnished in keeping with
his position. The former cinema, which had served as living
quarters for masses of old people, reverted to its former purpose
as an auditorium. The former Sokol building, which had housed the
chronically ill and those with communicable diseases, was masked as
a social center, with a performance hall and synagogue, and cafe
tables with gay umbrellas were set out on its veranda.
The program for the visit was worked out to the tiniest detail,
with mounting tension. Epstein prepared written answers to any
questions the visitors might ask and submitted them to headquarters
for approval. Sidewalks were scrubbed with soap and water, the food
staff was issued white gloves, the disabled were ordered not to
leave their quarters, rehearsals were held for athletic shows and
plays to be put on for the visitors. Rahm, a skilled organizer who
was better than his predecessor at putting on a friendly face,
checked every point along the route with Mo"hs; the show must pass
without incident. On a fine summer day, the distinguished entourage
appeared: Dr. Franz Hvass, representative of the Danish Foreign
Office; Dr. Yuel Henningsen, representing the Danish health
commissioner on behalf of the Danish Red Cross; Dr. M. Rossel,
commissioner of the International Red Cross; the commissioner of
the German Red Cross; the heads of the Gestapo in the Protectorate,
the head of the department for Jewish affairs, representatives of
the German Foreign Office, the Czech propaganda minister Moravec,
all in civilian clothing. Epstein received them dressed in a black
suit and top hat, as befit the head of a Jewish city during a roayl
visit. A car was put at his disposal, a carpet had been laid in his
office, and there he gave the visitors an introductory talk on the
ghetto, complete with figures, few of which matched the facts.
The visit lasted from the morning till seven in the evening, with a
break for a long and festive lunch. The guests saw a group of
suntanned agricultural workers pass by, as if by chance, hoes on
their shoulders, laughing and singing. At food distribution they
heard the domitory children ask, as primed: 'Uncle Rahm, are we
getting sardines again?' They saw a performance of the children's
opera Brundibar. They did not see the mass residences, the quarters
of the old or mentally ill, the transport files, the thousands of
cartons containing ashes, the Czech police on guard. Like obedient
children they walked along the route laid out for them, and their
general impression was exceedingly positive, as revealed in ther
reports, written on their return to their respective countries.
Most impressed was Dr. Rossel, the representative of the
International Red Cross in Geneva, who in a confidential report
wondered whith surprise why the Germans had postponed the visit for
so long: they had nothing to hide after all. Theresienstadt was in
all respects an admirable Jewish city, unifying the various
elements of the Jewish population, who had come from different
countries and diverse economic levels. There was no shortage of
furniture, carpets, curtains. The living quarters were comfortable,
though somewhat crowded: one flat was shared by two or three
families. The nutrition appeared adequate and ghetto residents even
received items that had long since disappeared from the market
outside. The dining rooms were spacious (they had been set up for
the day with waitresses in white aprons).
[...]
From the German viewpoint, according to Neuhaus, the visit had
passed satisfactorily in all respects. Since the representatives of
the Danish Red Cross were satisfied that all the Danes had remained
in Theresienstadt, and their chief worry after all had been for the
Danish Jews, they did not insist on a visit to an additional labor
camp and there was no longer any need to keep the stage set with
the family camp at Birkenau. It no longer served any purpose."
(Bondy, 437-41)
(The Birkenau family camp, no longer needed, was liquidated in July.
After using their set stage for a propaganda film, the Nazis sent
many of Theresienstadt's residents to Birkenau, where they were
liquidated. Others were sent to Germany as slave labor - seven
hundred and fifty survived to see the end of the war, out of over
3,000 that were sent to German camps.)
Work Cited
Bondy, Ruth. Elder of the Jews. New York: Grove Press, 1989.
(Translated from "Edelshtain neged had-zeman". Zmora, Bitan,
Modan, publishers, 1981
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.