Path: news.trends.ca!hub.org!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.iac.net!news.structured.net!news-out.communique.net!communique!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!ais.net!newsfeed.concentric.net!global-news-master From: catamont@[no-spam]concentric.net (Sara) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: Quotes From The Talmud Date: Tue, 06 Jan 1998 16:41:07 -0700 Organization: Concentric Internet Services Lines: 111 Message-ID:References: <68pn8s$lkk@sjx-ixn4.ix.netcom.com> <19980106004300.TAA19929@ladder01.news.aol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ts003d23.lon-co.concentric.net X-Newsreader: MT-NewsWatcher 2.3.5 Xref: news.trends.ca alt.revisionism:158495 In article <19980106004300.TAA19929@ladder01.news.aol.com>, gmc0633@aol.com (GMC0633) wrote: > "The Editio Princeps of the complete Code of Talmudic Law, Maimonides' Mishneh > Torah -- replete not only with the most offensive precepts against all Gentiles > but also with explicit attacks on Christianity and on Jesus (after whose name > the author adds piously: 'May the name of the wicked perish') -- was published > unexpurgated in Rome in the year 1480." Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish > Religion: The Weight of 3000 Years (London, 1994). > Please read this book before telling us what your modern English-language > Talmuds say. > ov "GMC," Below s part of the text from a Talmudic scholar, who responded to a question from me regarding the kinds of quotes seen above. -------BEGIN QUOTE-------- Deja vu... It seems that the quotations you asked about are the same ones that appeared in a (forged) pamphlet called "facts are facts" that I had to refute when I served as expert witness at the second Keegstra trial in 1992--he was teaching that material in his infamous Eckville classroom. Most of the quotes are blatantly fictitious and very easy to discount. Yes, these are the same texts that were taught in Mr. Keegstra's classes, and have long been circulated by various American antisemitic groups. Most of them are garbled from a work by I.V. Pranaitis, a slimy turn-of-the century Russian charlattan who served as an "expert witness" at the nototious Mendel Beiliss blood libel where he was literally laughed out of court for his displays of ignorance under cross-examination! ... "The Jews are human beings , but the nations of the world are not human beings but ^ beasts."- ^ -Baba Mecia 114, 6 [i.e.: 114b]. Apparently a deliberate mistranslation. The passage deals with the technical rules of corpse-impurity which, according to the author of this text, apply to Jews and not to gentiles. In this connection Ezekiel 34:31 is cited: "And ye My sheep [referring to Israel], the sheep of My pasture, are _men [Hebrew: "adam"]_, and I am your God, saith the Lord God." From a careful midrashic reading of this Biblical verse, Rabbi Simeon ben Yohai deduced "Only "ye" [i.e., Israel, not other nations] are designated "adam," in the sense that only Jewish corpses and graves generate impurity according to Numbers 19:14: "This is the law: when a _man ['adam']_ dieth in a tent, every one that cometh into the tent...shall be unclean seven days..." The passage is legal and exegetical, not theological. If anything, it seems to put Jews on a lower footing than non-Jews. Typically, the words "but beasts" were added on by whoever put this list together. They do not appear in the original. ^ 3. "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would ^ not have to be served by beasts. ^ The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and commanded ^ to serve the Jew day and night."- ^ -Midrasch Talpioth, p225-L. I was unable to check this reference in my extensive Judaica library. The book "Midrash Talpiyyot" is appparently an obscure eighteenth-century Kabbalistic work that is little known and carries no authority whatsoever. Even if the citation were correct (which seems doubtful in light of the other examples on this list, and the fact that Jews never employ the designation "Jehovah"), it is hard to imagine what could be proven from it about Judaism or the Talmud. ... "Goyim" literally refers to the "nations." In the Bible that includes Israel, but in Rabbinic works it designates the other nations of the world. Of course during Talmudic times the nations in question were the ones that Jews came in contact with, principally the Romans--there were no other monotheistic peoples around then, and the Romans, the "kingdom of evil," were despised for their cruelty, lewdness and immorality--similar views are found in Paul and in Revelation, and the accusations have some historical basis. Gentile Christians were not very well known at the time that the Talmud was redacted, and Jewish Christians are mentioned surprisingly rarely, as an internal heresy. They are referred to as "Minim" though the term encompassed several "heretical" views, especially dualists and gnostics. Medieval Jewish law for the most part did not understand these statements as applying to the monotheistic religions. I don't have time to check all the citations from Shahak. A few are clearly mistranslated (intentionally, I suspect), but most are probably based on actual sources. Several of them fall into the category of virulent anti-Roman "passive resistance" measures intended to loosen their occupation on the land of Israel. Pagans are indeed discriminated against in Jewish law, as Jews were under Roman administration (the comments were of course theoretical, since Jews did not administer their own judicial system). There are indeed a handful of anti-Christian traditions, reflecting the fierce controversies of the time. There is also a lot of "state of the art" medical advice that, of course, does not stand up to modern standards. The Talmud is a mixed bag. It is a collection of many contradictory opinions, and not everything in it has been accepted as valid by posterity. This is true about modern Judaism as well, where (especially among the Israel "religious right"), several Rabbis have voiced views which are clearly racist and reprehensible. ---------END QUOTE--------- Sara -- "Yeder aizel hot lib tsu hern vi er alein hirzhet." (Every ass likes to hear himself bray.) Yiddish folk saying
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.