Shofar FTP Archive File: people/v/von.ebersdorf.johannes/usenet/2009/v.ebersdorf.200904
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:19 EDT 2009
Article: 2005521 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-01.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Demjanjuk: 29,000 murder charges
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <8c163$49ceaf9a$596480f8$25997@news.upc.ie>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 64
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:38:30 -0400
Bytes: 4343
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005521
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:49:41 +0300, holman@mappi.helsinki.fi (Eugene
Holman) wrote:
>In article ,
>ebersdorf@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:51:01 +0300, holman@mappi.helsinki.fi (Eugene
>> Holman) wrote:
>>
>
>>
>> Sliming people is a standard technique of the holocaust™ industry, and
>> Irving is by no means the first victim.
>
>In this case David Irving was not a victim, since almost everything
>Deborah Lipstadt had written criticizing his professional misconduct could
>easily be demonstrated to be factually true, enough additional examples
>could be presented to demonstrate that she had identified a pattern of
>systematic professional misconduct rather than errors due to sloppiness or
>igorance, and the two cases that could not be demonstrated to be factually
>true could be shown to be based on David Irving's own accounts of his
>exploits and thus could not be considered maliciously false even if there
>were no independent facts available to demonsrate them to be true.
>
>> He was probably throwing good
>> money after bad in trying to get people like Lipstadt to lay off using
>> the courts.
>
>Your sentence doesn't make sense. Deborah Lipstadt was not the one
>resorting to use of the courts in this particular case.
Nobody said she was. Irving was trying to get the woman off his back
with her character assassination techniques, but the British courts
proved to be worthless in terms of protecting him from Lipstadt and
her big-money backers.
Hiring a nice death squad from El Salvador would have been cheaper and
a lot more effective than the British courts, but then that technique
tends to have other complications that follow.
>David Irving
>thought that once Prof. Lipstadt's book was published on his home turf,
>where libel law favors the plaintiff, he could use the court to silence
>critics by having legitimate professional criticism of his work,
>methodology, and public behavior declared libelous consequent to suing the
>critic and her publisher. The strategem, ill advised in a culture where
>public criticism of malpractice is the professional responsiblity of the
>community offended, didn't work.
>
>David Irving wanted to be regarded as a brilliant and iconoclastic
>historian, so he got his name into the spotlight and constructed a
>reputation for himself by consistently falsifying and fabricating crucial
>details concerning his primay data. Historian Deborah Lipstadt collected
>several examples of such unacceptable professional behavior and brought it
>to the attention of her professional community and the public at large.
>David Irving never denied his professional misconduct, but he tried to
>hijack the British court system to prevent legitimate criticism of his
>professional misconduct from reaching the wider public and his potential
>future readership.
>
>
>
>Regards,
>Eugene Holman
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:19 EDT 2009
Article: 2005522 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-06.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Nazi guard a free man in Austria
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID: <225at4tddcn5pvail4h67c9jv1kffd948v@4ax.com>
References: <68711a19-1820-4907-ac76-105a17aac4d5@y33g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <6b7cb8d0-f9b9-47f8-be5d-0fa349b4a7ac@k19g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 15
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:40:47 -0400
Bytes: 1940
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005522
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:30:14 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
wrote:
>On Apr 1, 5:48 pm, Topaz wrote:
>> Here is a quote from "The Battle for Berlin" by Joseph Goebbels:
> Invading the U.S.S.R. did not work out too well for you guys.
If Hitler hadn't invaded the USSR, the USSR would undoubtedly have
invaded Germany by July of 1941. Germany bought a few more years of
survival through the pre-emptive invasion. All the Soviet positions
shouted "pending invasion" rather than being defensive in nature.
>
>
> Michael
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:20 EDT 2009
Article: 2005523 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-01.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Nazi guard a free man in Austria
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <68711a19-1820-4907-ac76-105a17aac4d5@y33g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 32
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:48:16 -0400
Bytes: 2604
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005523
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 09:10:26 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
wrote:
>On Mar 30, 5:31 am, Johannes von Ebersdorf
>wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 11:50:09 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> wrote:
>> >On Mar 28, 5:57 am, Topaz wrote:
>> >> by James Buchanan
>>
>> >> Let's say the Germans merely removed the Jews from positions of
>> >> political power and banned them from the legal profession.
>> > How were things in Germany on May 1, 1945?
>>
>> What is special about May 1?
> It was the day after Hitler killed himself.
The war continued unabated, and it was the German armed services that
decided a week later that it was impractical to continue. The
machinery of state continued to function and a new chancellor was
appointed in the form of Grand Admiral Dönitz. There was nothing
special about May 1. It was May 8 that was the onset of the
catastrophe for Germany. Far more people died AFTER May 8, 1945 than
had died between January 30, 1933 and May 8, 1945. It was another one
of those Iraqi-style allied "liberations" that have now clearly become
the pattern of allied "liberations".
>
>
> Michael
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:20 EDT 2009
Article: 2005525 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Excommunicated English "Holocaust denier" bishop reinstated by Pope
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID: <1n5at41lj3a7dpvna952mri0lbg0vlv4sr@4ax.com>
References: <822f9$49ceaf84$596480f8$25997@news.upc.ie> <3a905$49d0c804$596480f8$19141@news.upc.ie> <8c50f$49d1d537$596480f8$18987@news.upc.ie> <6a110$49d26730$596480f8$4353@news.upc.ie> <8pr4t45bjh4lnr551a99qe0f6nipktoii6@4ax.com> <615ab$49d3a49b$596480f8$14434@news.upc.ie>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 160
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:52:05 -0400
Bytes: 8028
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005525
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 15:33:11 +0100, "Mavisbeacon"
wrote:
>
>"Johannes von Ebersdorf" wrote in message
>news:8pr4t45bjh4lnr551a99qe0f6nipktoii6@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:34:47 +0100, "Mavisbeacon"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Johannes von Ebersdorf" wrote in message
>>>news:pkn4t45nu0a1hk71v244t3vg1ktnnhd0ib@4ax.com...
>>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:59:48 +0100, "Mavisbeacon"
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Johannes von Ebersdorf" wrote in message
>>>>>news:ftm1t4trursgmfr8t4v8jkfn40n05mgqhv@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:24:11 +0100, "Mavisbeacon"
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Johannes von Ebersdorf" wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:ese1t459hkcgejphoibtvs5pcffmum731s@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:56:24 -0000, "Mavisbeacon"
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>[snip]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Disputing some aspect or another of the Norman Conquest or the feats
>>>>>>>> of Alexander the Great will not get you thrown in jail.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>WRONG! If you are in the UK and you deny the Norman invasion and the
>>>>>>>consequent seccession of Monarchs you may come under a criminal
>>>>>>>offence
>>>>>>>which related to insulting the Monarch which you may believe is not a
>>>>>>>Monarch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your current German royal family has no connection whatsoever with the
>>>>>> Normans, except for being monarchs of the same state.
>>>>>
>>>>>Due to the war of the roses leading to tudors and the hanoverian
>>>>>succession
>>>>>due to william III invasion I will accept that criticism. and withdraw
>>>>>the
>>>>>remark as unsupported
>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_British_line_of_succession
>>>>>
>>>>>However under the post monarchy irish constitutional Republic and in the
>>>>>current British monarchy the offence of blastphemy still exists as far
>>>>>as
>>>>>I
>>>>>know. so while denying the Normans of a thousand years ago many or may
>>>>>not
>>>>>be a crime denying christ of two thousand years ago is! Not alone that
>>>>>but
>>>>>people are and have been killed for beliefs related to Christianity from
>>>>>christ himself through martyrs up to people killed by fundamentalist
>>>>>christians today.
>>>>
>>>> I guess that the Brits need to clean the cobwebs out of their statute
>>>> books. Blasphemy is rather ambiguous, since it depends entirely on
>>>> whose superstitions you are criticizing.
>>>
>>>
>>>Not just the British. Ireland is a constitutional Republic but does indeed
>>>have common law continuation from the British. but to be honest codified
>>>systems have other problems . But that is a different topic to historic
>>>laws
>>>still applying today. I believe I have shown that they do and in face
>>>PRECEDENT is all about this so Holocaust denial is not the only crime
>>>based
>>>on insisting and interpretation of history as true.
>>
>> Yes, there are indeed precedents for the holocaustT laws, but not in
>> the most recent two or three centuries. The Roman Church had a long
>> history of keeping its lies afloat by burning people at the stake,
>> poking their eyes out, or throwing them into dungeons, but even such
>> extreme measures were not able to suppress the truth forever.
>
>That is nonsence! the RC Church did very little in the way of this . the
>Inquisition in various guises lasted for about five hundred years. In that
>time at most thousands were executed by it. While I do not justify it
>compared to other acts from that time it isnt huge. for example the
>atheistic purge arising during the terror in one place in France (the
>Vendee) say the execution of more catholics then the entire five centuries
>of the Inquisition. Indeed the worst Inquisitions (Spanish and Portugese)
>targeted Jews. But it wasnt about "surpressing the truth" but more about
>rooting out heresy. And In the Spanish case it became totally corrupted
>because the Inquisitors took over the possessions and land of the person
>they accused - nothing to do even with a misguided notion of a conspiracy to
>surpress truth.
>
>again I suspect you wil produce NO FACTS about how many people were burned
>at the stake and in what years it happened in spite of your "long history"
>of doing it claim!
>
>So much for your claims about history standing on its own! I am a real
>revisionist. You are an interloper. you haven't a clue and it seems you
>don't want to learn either preferring your biased bigotry to informed
>opinion.
There are no historical supports for your claim of "at most a few
thousand" victims of the witch hunts, heretic hunts, etc. of the
Church of Rome, probably the most evil institution ever to exist in
human history. I'm glad that Luther and the German Princes managed to
destroy its influence in Germany.
>
>
>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>[snip]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Historical facts tend to stand on their own and do not require
>>>>>>>> legislative protection.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Examples???
>>>>>>>Have you ANY example to support this contention? Say three examples?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The holocaust is unique in requiring legislative support.
>>>>>
>>>>>Have you examples of any others which you claim "stand on their own" and
>>>>>"do
>>>>>not require legislative support"? what historical fact do you claim
>>>>>"stands
>>>>>on its own"?
>>>>>Can you give an example of three such "FACTS" which you seem so suer
>>>>>stand
>>>>>on theior own and are facts?
>>>>>
>>>>>Ill bet you cant cite one from the last 500 years one from the 1000
>>>>>years
>>>>>before that and noe from over 2000 years ago.
>>>>>
>>>>>In spite of saying all of history is a collection of "FACTS" that stand
>>>>>on
>>>>>their own you cant even cite three from the last 2500 years! Can you?
>>>
>>>evasion noted. In spie of saying everything else apart from the Holocaust
>>>stands on its own you can't cite three examples from the ennumerable ones
>>>in
>>>history!
>>>LOL!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Clearly the holocaustT story is in need of
>>>>>>>> legislative protection and in need of rat packs like the McFee-McVay
>>>>>>>> duo to threaten, intimidate and cajole people into paying lip
>>>>>>>> service
>>>>>>>> to the story whether they actually believe it or not.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No. Im my country holocaust denial is NOT a crime
>>>>>[snip]
>>>
>
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:20 EDT 2009
Article: 2005527 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-01.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: freed from holocaust denial
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <735t7sFrf6pcU1@mid.individual.net> <-NudnWJhioasXVDUnZ2dnVY3go-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <7eq4t4hcehed816ic58pcelp4g9kk1iab2@4ax.com> <5a27beaf-c12a-456f-bab6-b731b33d06d2@v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 48
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:57:40 -0400
Bytes: 2956
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005527
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:57:17 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
wrote:
>On Mar 31, 11:07 am, Johannes von Ebersdorf
>wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:20:38 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>> wrote:
>> >On Mar 27, 10:14 pm, "B.H. Cramer" wrote:
>> >> "Heinrich" wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:735t7sFrf6pcU1@mid.individual.net...
>>
>> >> > Greek court officials said judges overturned Friday a far-rightist's
>> >> > conviction for inciting racial hatred with a book that denies the
>> >> > Holocaust took place.
>>
>> >> That is splendid news.
>>
>> >> Now to overturn the convictions and sentences of Germar Rudolf, Ernst
>> >> Zundel, Stolz et al.
>> > On what basis?
>>
>> Political "propaganda offences" have no place in a democracy.
>>
> Yes, but the laws would have to be changed first, followed with
>pardons.
>
> Judges would not be able to overturn those convictions on there
>own; there is no legal protection of freedom of speech in those
>places.
In Germany, supposedly there actually IS freedom of speech and freedom
of opinion, so the propaganda laws are probably unconstitutional, but
it would be very difficult for any lawyer to challenge them in court
without himself falling victim to the legislation. That is exactly why
the aforementioned defendants didn't get much legal representation
because the lawyers representing them do so at great personal risk.
Several lawyers have found themselves in the prisoner's docket for
something they said trying to defend their clients.
In Canada, lawyers such as Douglas Christie do not have to fear court
reprisals for defending their clients.
>
>
> Michael
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:21 EDT 2009
Article: 2005528 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-07.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: racing old jew stuns police
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <737aedFqc0alU1@mid.individual.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 52
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:59:23 -0400
Bytes: 3373
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005528
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:36:51 -0700 (PDT), z
wrote:
>On Mar 29, 12:23 am, william hubbard
>wrote:
>> On Mar 28, 12:00 pm, "Heinrich" wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Police officers surprised: Traffic police in Israel are used to nabbbing
>> > young drivers traveling at high speed, yet on Saturday officers on Highway
>> > 65 were in for a surprise - A motorist nabbed traveling at 191 kilometers an
>> > hour (roughly 120 miles an hour) turned out to be an 83-year-old man.
>>
>> > The elderly speed junky told police he was in a rush to get home.
>>
>> > The man, who was traveling in a Subaru at more than double the speed limit,
>> > does not have a long history of traffic violations, the police said.
>> > However, officials noted that he has been convicted of traveling above the
>> > spend limit several times.
>>
>> > The speeding driver's license was revoked on the spot, and he will face
>> > justice at the local traffic court.
>>
>> > Only two and a half weeks ago, a 21-year-old Palestinian from Ramallah was
>> > nabbed while traveling at 215 kilometers an hour on Highway 1, en route to
>> > the Dead Sea. The speed limit on the highway is 90 kilometers an hour.
>>
>> i suspect it was a WRX, and it is good to know that the old man has
>> such enthusiasm..- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Here's another:
>
>"Woman accused of driving 103 with grandson in car
>Mar 31st, 2009 | SALEM, Ore. -- Authorities arrested a woman accused
>of driving 103 mph with her 10-year-old grandson in the car. Sheriff's
>Lt. Sheila Lorance said Deputy Ryan Postlewait saw the woman's Mazda 6
>whizz by on Hylo Road on Sunday, and he confirmed the speed on a radar
>gun. Though the road is known to attract speeders, Postlewait reported
>that he has never clocked anyone driving that fast."
>http://www.salon.com/wires/ap/2009/03/31/D979BOK01_odd_speeding_grandmother/index.html
100 mph is only 160 km/h. There was a recent case here in Ontario
where a young man was clocked at 260 km/h on one of the local
highways. I can't remember the make of the car, however.
>
>it's an international epidemic
>
>my theory is that the speed limit should be equal to your age.
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:21 EDT 2009
Article: 2005533 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-02.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Jesus tried to warn us about the Jews -"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lust of your father ye will do."
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <49c2447f$0$30005$9b536df3@news.fv.fi> <9d722$49d1d539$596480f8$18987@news.upc.ie> <1qq4t41c7o2r9n0v9h33uph60bvnh8gmrf@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 142
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:17:28 -0400
Bytes: 6916
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005533
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 15:22:10 +0100, "Mavisbeacon"
wrote:
>
>"Johannes von Ebersdorf" wrote in message
>news:1qq4t41c7o2r9n0v9h33uph60bvnh8gmrf@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:32:48 +0100, "Mavisbeacon"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"B.H. Cramer" wrote in message
>>>news:CsmdnZPaZOVxpl7UnZ2dnVY3go2dnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>[snip]
>>>>>>
>>>>> Jesus was a Jew himself.
>>>>
>>>> Are you sure about that? You can prove that?
>>>>
>>>The historicity of Jesus is an established field of research.
>>>But if anyone believes in Jesus Christ existing in the past then it is
>>>ludicrous to believe he was NOT a Jew.
>>>If one is claiming that Jesus Christ never existed then claiming he was or
>>>was not a Jew is pointless since one assigning an attribute to something
>>>which does not exist - a bit like saying the dragon was BLUE. It is
>>>pointless to argue about whether they are blue red or yellow if your main
>>>point is that dragons never existed.
>>>
>>>As it happens though the historicity of Jesus is as established (or
>>>probably
>>>more established) as say Alexander the Great for example.
>>
>> Actually no, since lots of people saw or experienced Alexander the
>> Great,
>
>Really?
>And your evidence is?
>Lots of people also saw and experienced Jesus by the way.
Nonsense. Jesus wrote nothing, built nothing, founded nothing, and
simply was not noticed by anybody other than the people who wrote the
scriptures.
>What evidence do you have from "lots" of people? I am aware of at most maybe
>a dozen sources which can be traced to that time. and even THEY are not
>original extant sources. Most sources are from CENTURIES later. in fact I am
>only aware of maybe ONE or TWO artifacts which date from the time of
>alexander which may be construed as a reference to him.
That is all crap. There are Persian records of Alexander's exploits,
Indian records of Alexander's exploits, Egyptian records of
Alexander's exploits and a whole trail of new Greek states and cities
in his wake. It is extremely unlikely that all these different people
living in different societies were all stoned on pot at the same time
and saw hallucinations that were coordinated.
Silly statements such as yours are one of the reasons that the term
"Christian" has become a synonym for "drooling imbecile".
>
>>whereas the only references to Jesus are in the Christian
>> scriptures,
>
>WRONG! Roman historians wrote of him and others outsede of the accepted
>canon of Holy scriptures.
Show me just ONE non scriptural reference to Jesus, and you will
become world famous, since you will be the only person ever to have
produced one.
> But my poiint is that people accepted Jesus
>existed (whether or not he was God).
Religious folks accept all manner of stuff without evidence or proof.
That is the nature of a religion.
> few say he didnt.
The bulk of the world's people would dispute the divinity of Christ,
and even a few Christians.
>More however seem to
>think the Holocaust which has loads more evidence didn't happen.
Show me some physical evidence that will stand up to scientific
scrutiny for the "jumping buckets of flesh" stories, or the
"flame-belching crematoria". Obviously there actually WAS a
significant death toll among Jews, but that isn't quite the same thing
as uncritically and naively accepting every ridiculous fable that is
in circulation about that period.
>
>>all written at least a century after the traditional date
>> of the crucifixion.
>
>Not necessarily true. some may be first century. Certainly the second
>century stuff refers to the earlier works of which people do not have whole
>copies. But what about Alexander the Great? The things written about him
>are from books at least THREE centuries later! not ONE but THREE!
There was much material written about Alexander DURING his lifetime,
especially by his Persian and Greek enemies. Those count as
independent verification because they were not penned by followers and
lackeys of the person under consideration.
>
>>There is no independent verification of Christ's
>> existence, whereas there are plentiful references to Alexander the
>> Great,
>
>Really? Suppose you produce say five or six of these "plentiful" references.
Good Lord, woman, go into any library and there are still plentiful
references to Alexander, despite the campaign of the Church of Rome to
have all records of antiquity destroyed.
>Ill bet you cant produce one because I have studied the field
If that is the case, then it wasn't much of an educational
institution.
> and I expect
>you wont find a SINGLE reference! go on produce five of these "plenty" can
>you?
>
>>especially since Alexander overthrew a lot of existing states
>> and founded a number of cities.
>
>Did he? and you know that because? You seem to believe it without seeing ANY
>evidence! Yet whenh it comes to the holocaust you doubt all the loads of
>evidence. why dont you apply even a tiny amount of that doubt for Alexander
>for whom you have seen no extant evidence?
>
>Mind you all the more reason to be amazed at the son of a Carpenter being
>remembered MORE then and written MORE about than the Greatest General in
>history and the conquerer of the world at the time!
Most of the Bible stories come under the heading of fables, and cannot
be confused with history. All human religions, including yours,
consist of fables and legends. They all have the same validity.
>
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:22 EDT 2009
Article: 2005539 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Canadian anti-Semitic incidents rise
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <73hehnFssmpnU1@mid.individual.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 49
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:25:18 -0400
Bytes: 3338
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005539
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 08:29:53 -0700, "ÇDoügßT" wrote:
>"Heinrich" wrote in message
>news:73hehnFssmpnU1@mid.individual.net...
>> OTTAWA : Anti-Semitism in Canada is "at an all-time high," according to
>> the findings of an annual audit.
>>
>> Anti-Semitic incidents in Canada rose by 8.9 percent in 2008 over the
>> previous year, due partly to the sour economy, according to B'nai Brith
>> Canada's League for Human Rights. Its 2008 Audit of Anti-Semitic Incidents
>> released Tuesday tallied 1,135 incidents, representing a more than a
>> four-fold increase in incidents over the past decade.
>>
>> The findings "offer a paradoxical view of the state of anti-Jewish
>> prejudice in Canada," said Frank Dimant, B'nai Brith Canada's executive
>> vice president. "On one hand we have a government that has made it a
>> priority to root out hatred and an official Liberal opposition that also
>> recognizes the widespread anti-Jewish prejudice against our community."
>>
>> Jews are again being scapegoated, "this time by disgruntled citizens
>> impacted by an ailing economy," the audit said. It is no accident,
>> according to the audit, that 547 incidents -- nearly half the total in
>> Canada -- took place in the final four months of 2008.
>>
>> "We attribute this to the fallout from the developing economic recession
>> and such high-profile fiascos as the Bernard Madoff scandal," B'nai Brith
>> Canada said in a news release.
>>
>> December saw the highest total of the year with 151 incidents -- 70 were
>> related to the start of Israel's military operation in Gaza, the
>> organization noted. Of these, 36 occurred in the last few days of the year
>> as tensions heightened.
>> __________________
>>
>
>The reason is the mass immigration/invasion of islamonazi pigs to
>Canada. At the local university in Southern California where I live
>we NEVER had problems w/public anti-semitic bullshit until the muslime
>pigs showed up.
Crap. There are a handful of Muslims in Canada, and the vast bulk of
them are productive and law-abiding citizens. There are a handful of
extremists, but they have little influence in Canada and neither do
Christian extremists.
American hate-mongers and ridiculous bigots like yourself are
nauseating.
>
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:22 EDT 2009
Article: 2005799 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-01.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Demjanjuk: 29,000 murder charges
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID: <7uket4pipgr5v05uik6e32rg8549cs4dvv@4ax.com>
References:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 35
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 08:34:40 -0400
Bytes: 3003
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005799
On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:49:39 -0400, Gord McFee
wrote:
>On 3/31/2009 12:03 AM, Eugene Holman wrote:
>
>> In article , Gord
>> McFee wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/30/2009 9:00 AM, Johannes von Ebersdorf wrote:
>>>
>>
>>>> This material does appear to be written on a German typewriter,
>>>> but then it didn't surface until 1947, so Americans getting hold
>>>> of German typewriters would have been no problem. Anything that
>>>> was ever in allied hands is suspect, and cannot simply be taken
>>>> at face value. The paper would need to be analyzed to make sure
>>>> that it is consistent with the ministry allegedly involved, the
>>>> typewriter ink would need chemical analysis to make sure that it
>>>> was of German origin, and numerous other physical aspects.
>>> I guess I should have expected something like that. First you
>>> claim the document were not written by a German speaking person.
>>> Then, when it is clear it was, you have to resort to the forgery
>>> gambit.
>>
>> And if the chemical analysis demonstrated everything to be of German
>> origin he could accuse the chemists of bias, being paid by the Jews,
>> or (gasp!) of being Jews themselves. These folks never give up and
>> are never convinced. It's always a matter of supervising the people
>> who supervise the supervisors.
>
>Indeed. They are unable and unwilling to approach the issue empirically
>because their minds are already made up.
That accusation fits you a hell of a lot better than it fits me.
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:22 EDT 2009
Article: 2005800 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-07.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Demjanjuk: 29,000 murder charges
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID: <20let4dt2dj8m7qchopk5gnnk5o6iols58@4ax.com>
References:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 85
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 08:39:37 -0400
Bytes: 5208
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005800
On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:53:47 -0400, Gord McFee
wrote:
>On 3/31/2009 2:24 PM, Johannes von Ebersdorf wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:03:33 -0400, Gord McFee
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/30/2009 9:00 AM, Johannes von Ebersdorf wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:45:27 -0400, Gord McFee
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 11:54:04 -0400, in
>>>>> , Johannes von
>>>>> Ebersdorf wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:40:32 -0400, Gord McFee
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The language used in the Wannsee Protocol is dry,
>>>>>>>>> arcane bureaucratic German, yes. I have never said
>>>>>>>>> otherwise. Ben, you know I am a bureaucrat. I am the
>>>>>>>>> first to admit that bureaucrats do not write beautiful
>>>>>>>>> language.
>>>>>>>> Having seen photocopies of the Wannsee Protocols, I would
>>>>>>>> say that dry arcane German is the least of their
>>>>>>>> problems. It seems, like in so many other cases, that the
>>>>>>>> originals are nowhere to be found and all that remains
>>>>>>>> are these allied "official" copies of a copy that were
>>>>>>>> clearly typed on an American typewriter.
>>>>>>> That is simply invention on your part.
>>>>>> I've seen quite a few obvious forgeries. The only invention
>>>>>> was on the part of the Americans/British who created the
>>>>>> documents.
>>>>> Then I would be interested in your take on the Wannsee
>>>>> Protokoll original here:
>>>> This material does appear to be written on a German typewriter,
>>>> but then it didn't surface until 1947, so Americans getting hold
>>>> of German typewriters would have been no problem. Anything that
>>>> was ever in allied hands is suspect, and cannot simply be taken
>>>> at face value. The paper would need to be analyzed to make sure
>>>> that it is consistent with the ministry allegedly involved, the
>>>> typewriter ink would need chemical analysis to make sure that it
>>>> was of German origin, and numerous other physical aspects.
>>> I guess I should have expected something like that. First you
>>> claim the document were not written by a German speaking person.
>>
>> I didn't say anything about it being written by a German-speaking
>> person. That was your straw man. The allies surely had some
>> German-speaking employees capable of putting something like this
>> together, but that hardly proves that the item is genuine or even
>> significant.
>>
>> The infamous Zimmermann telegraph of WW1 was a forgery created in
>> Toronto, and that only become public more than half a century after
>> the fact.
>>
>> I really don't trust any documents that have ever been in allied
>> hands. They have a long, long history of fraud.
>
>Very convenient, since all the captured documents were in some allied
>hands at some point, so you neatly dismiss every single Nazi document.
>The Führer would be proud.
>
>By the way, can you provide a scintilla of support fr your fairy tale
>that the Zimmerman telegram was fake?
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zimmermann_Telegram
>
>Of course you can't.
Take your whine to the Toronto Star. They published a story a few
years ago indicating that the so-called Zimmermann telegram was
fabricated in Toronto.
Besides, no German foreign minister would ever send such a thing by
telegram, a medium that is easily intercepted. With that content, the
message would have been delivered personally and written in code.
Your continuous demands for "proof" are getting sillier by the day. I
don't keep a running log of everything I read just in case I encounter
the McFee jackass on usenet some future year.
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:23 EDT 2009
Article: 2005801 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-07.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Demjanjuk: 29,000 murder charges
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <8c163$49ceaf9a$596480f8$25997@news.upc.ie> <70o4t4lm6tc42v3blmlqkfb0m7vm6e4ksk@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 45
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 08:40:16 -0400
Bytes: 3188
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005801
On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:57:54 -0400, Gord McFee
wrote:
>On 3/31/2009 2:27 PM, Johannes von Ebersdorf wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:04:47 -0400, Gord McFee
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/30/2009 9:09 AM, Johannes von Ebersdorf wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:46:52 -0400, Gord McFee
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:04:36 -0000, in
>>>>> <8c163$49ceaf9a$596480f8$25997@news.upc.ie>, "Mavisbeacon"
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>> And for his next trick, Cramer will claim that original gospels
>>>>>> don't exiat and no original copies of Homer, or of the writings
>>>>>> of Plato and Aristotle or of the teachings of Socrates. So based
>>>>>> on that he will argue that Jesus didnt exist or alexander the
>>>>>> Great or socrates or the Normans or anything else in history for
>>>>>> which he has not seen the original copies of anything written by
>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> do people not find it strange that he seems only to douby the
>>>>>> WWII Holocaust and not apply the same degree of doubt to things
>>>>>> with much less evidence?
>>>>> Not in the slightest. He is a Holocaust denier and that is their
>>>>> modus operandi.
>>>> You're being rather silly, olde gourd.
>>> I take it Cramer has fled the scene for a while and you are the substitute?
>>
>> Mr. Cramer's only connection to me is that we sometimes battle the
>> same idiots on this newsgroup. We most likely would not see eye to eye
>> on many topics, but here the opponents are so fanatical, hysterical
>> and bigoted that somebody has to offer some opposition to their
>> nonsense.
>
>So you are the substitute. Pity.
Gourd, if you had a brain you would be dangerous.
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:23 EDT 2009
Article: 2005803 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Demjanjuk: 29,000 murder charges
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <8c163$49ceaf9a$596480f8$25997@news.upc.ie>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 08:44:06 -0400
Bytes: 3711
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005803
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 07:20:44 +0300, holman@mappi.helsinki.fi (Eugene
Holman) wrote:
>In article ,
>ebersdorf@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:49:41 +0300, holman@mappi.helsinki.fi (Eugene
>> Holman) wrote:
>>
>
>> >
>> >Your sentence doesn't make sense. Deborah Lipstadt was not the one
>> >resorting to use of the courts in this particular case.
>>
>> Nobody said she was. Irving was trying to get the woman off his back
>> with her character assassination techniques,...
>
>How was Deborah Lipstadt using "character assassination techniques"? She
>wrote that he was a dishonest historian, something that had been known
>since David Irving's lost libel suit and the fallout from his book about
>the bombing of Dresden,
Irving's book on Dresden is consistent with the observations and
recollections of people who were there. Lipstadt is just another paid
propagandist whose job it is to excuse or minimize allied crimes.
> and she backed up her claims with concrete and
>undeniable examles. If you accuse someone of professional malpractice and
>then support your accusation with dozens of examples, you are not engaging
>in character assassination, but rather doing the public a service.
>
>> but the British courts
>> proved to be worthless in terms of protecting him from Lipstadt and
>> her big-money backers.
>
>Quite the opposite. The British courts proved that they cannot be hijacked
>to protect a British citizen from accusations of malpractice leveled by a
>foreigner if the accusations are demonstrably true.
>
>> Hiring a nice death squad from El Salvador would have been cheaper and
>> a lot more effective than the British courts, but then that technique
>> tends to have other complications that follow.
>
>Is that really the way that you think people courageous enough to expose
>serial malpractioners should be dealt with? You have no problems with
>wannabe historians whose "sensational discoveries" turn out to be nothing
>more than manipulation of dates and deliberately mistranslating documents?
>Do you also recommend the El Salvadoran method of termination with extreme
>prejudice to be used on people who expose cow doctors practicing medicine
>on humans?
>
>
>
>Regards,
>Eugene Holman
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:23 EDT 2009
Article: 2005805 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-01.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Nazi guard a free man in Austria
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID: <3jlet49i4c1qqbkpf03uvbt3q4g83ta0g1@4ax.com>
References: <81dss4dmojfd97v92gf8vkkljjhqh5fc0f@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 65
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 08:47:11 -0400
Bytes: 3773
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005805
On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:09:02 -0400, Gord McFee
wrote:
>On 3/31/2009 2:15 PM, Johannes von Ebersdorf wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:32:54 -0400, Gord McFee
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/30/2009 9:39 AM, Johannes von Ebersdorf wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:19:21 -0400, Gord McFee
>>>> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>> Who started what is debatable. I see you are sticking to the
>>>>>> thoughtless allied propaganda claims. That is part of the
>>>>>> reason I reject the rest of your stories. AJP Taylor's book
>>>>>> "The Origins of the Second World War" makes some sense,
>>>>>> whereas you never have.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I have read his book more than once and there is a great deal
>>>>> of truth in it. Actually, his book is an example of
>>>>> *legitimate* revisionism.
>>>>>
>>>>> But the fact remains that Hitler invaded Poland after having
>>>>> been explicitly told, several months before, that if he did so,
>>>>> treaty obligations would require England to intervene.
>>>> Britain said that the Polish frontier wasn't worth the bones of a
>>>> single British grenadier, and suddenly allowing Poland to keep a
>>>> few square kilometres of stolen German land was worth the
>>>> sacrifice of more than fifty million people. Poland was merely an
>>>> excuse to try to legitimize a war that Churchill had planned for
>>>> years.
>>> Even if that were true, which it isn't,
>>
>> We have only your assertion for that, and it simply isn't worth much.
>>
>No, we have both German and British documents that confirm it.
Bullshit.
>
>>> the fact remains that Hitler knew before he invaded Poland that
>>> Britain was obliged to come to Poland's defence.
>>
>> Nonsense. Britain didn't come to Poland's defence since they said not
>> a peep about the simultaneous Soviet invasion.
>
>They declared war.
Britain wanted war for its own reasons, not to "save" Poland. They
didn't give a flying shit about Poland.
>
>>>>> And Goebbels and his wife murdered their own children.
>>>> I guess they saw visions of Nemmersdorf and numerous other places
>>>> the allies visited.
>>> No, they were simply fanatical and selfish.
That is just your simple-minded historical tripe.
>>
>> No, you're simply full of shit.
>
>Ah, when trumped, insult the other person. Mr Webb has you bunch pegged.
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:24 EDT 2009
Article: 2005807 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Nazi guard a free man in Austria
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID: <8olet41l48jo8gqbcjcv5d176e352ut497@4ax.com>
References: <68711a19-1820-4907-ac76-105a17aac4d5@y33g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 39
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 08:50:34 -0400
Bytes: 3019
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005807
On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:21:13 -0400, Gord McFee
wrote:
>On 4/2/2009 3:48 PM, Johannes von Ebersdorf wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 09:10:26 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 30, 5:31 am, Johannes von Ebersdorf
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 11:50:09 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Mar 28, 5:57 am, Topaz wrote:
>>>>>> by James Buchanan
>>>>>> Let's say the Germans merely removed the Jews from positions of
>>>>>> political power and banned them from the legal profession.
>>>>> How were things in Germany on May 1, 1945?
>>>> What is special about May 1?
>>> It was the day after Hitler killed himself.
>>
>> The war continued unabated, and it was the German armed services that
>> decided a week later that it was impractical to continue. The
>> machinery of state continued to function and a new chancellor was
>> appointed in the form of Grand Admiral Dönitz. There was nothing
>> special about May 1. It was May 8 that was the onset of the
>> catastrophe for Germany. Far more people died AFTER May 8, 1945 than
>> had died between January 30, 1933 and May 8, 1945. It was another one
>> of those Iraqi-style allied "liberations" that have now clearly become
>> the pattern of allied "liberations".
>
>I don't know what you are imbibing, but it must be illegal.
LOL
When cornered, olde gourd accuses others of being druggies.
It is pretty much common knowledge that the dying in Germany basically
started on May 8, 1945 putting all the war deaths into shadow.
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:24 EDT 2009
Article: 2005810 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-07.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Excommunicated English "Holocaust denier" bishop reinstated by Pope
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <3a905$49d0c804$596480f8$19141@news.upc.ie> <8c50f$49d1d537$596480f8$18987@news.upc.ie> <6a110$49d26730$596480f8$4353@news.upc.ie> <8pr4t45bjh4lnr551a99qe0f6nipktoii6@4ax.com> <615ab$49d3a49b$596480f8$14434@news.upc.ie> <1n5at41lj3a7dpvna952mri0lbg0vlv4sr@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 182
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 08:55:31 -0400
Bytes: 9185
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005810
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 01:56:39 +0100, "Mavisbeacon"
wrote:
>
>"Johannes von Ebersdorf" wrote in message
>news:1n5at41lj3a7dpvna952mri0lbg0vlv4sr@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 15:33:11 +0100, "Mavisbeacon"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Johannes von Ebersdorf" wrote in message
>>>news:8pr4t45bjh4lnr551a99qe0f6nipktoii6@4ax.com...
>>>> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:34:47 +0100, "Mavisbeacon"
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Johannes von Ebersdorf" wrote in message
>>>>>news:pkn4t45nu0a1hk71v244t3vg1ktnnhd0ib@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:59:48 +0100, "Mavisbeacon"
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Johannes von Ebersdorf" wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:ftm1t4trursgmfr8t4v8jkfn40n05mgqhv@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:24:11 +0100, "Mavisbeacon"
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"Johannes von Ebersdorf" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>news:ese1t459hkcgejphoibtvs5pcffmum731s@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:56:24 -0000, "Mavisbeacon"
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>[snip]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Disputing some aspect or another of the Norman Conquest or the
>>>>>>>>>> feats
>>>>>>>>>> of Alexander the Great will not get you thrown in jail.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>WRONG! If you are in the UK and you deny the Norman invasion and the
>>>>>>>>>consequent seccession of Monarchs you may come under a criminal
>>>>>>>>>offence
>>>>>>>>>which related to insulting the Monarch which you may believe is not
>>>>>>>>>a
>>>>>>>>>Monarch.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your current German royal family has no connection whatsoever with
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> Normans, except for being monarchs of the same state.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Due to the war of the roses leading to tudors and the hanoverian
>>>>>>>succession
>>>>>>>due to william III invasion I will accept that criticism. and withdraw
>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>remark as unsupported
>>>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_British_line_of_succession
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>However under the post monarchy irish constitutional Republic and in
>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>current British monarchy the offence of blastphemy still exists as far
>>>>>>>as
>>>>>>>I
>>>>>>>know. so while denying the Normans of a thousand years ago many or may
>>>>>>>not
>>>>>>>be a crime denying christ of two thousand years ago is! Not alone that
>>>>>>>but
>>>>>>>people are and have been killed for beliefs related to Christianity
>>>>>>>from
>>>>>>>christ himself through martyrs up to people killed by fundamentalist
>>>>>>>christians today.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess that the Brits need to clean the cobwebs out of their statute
>>>>>> books. Blasphemy is rather ambiguous, since it depends entirely on
>>>>>> whose superstitions you are criticizing.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Not just the British. Ireland is a constitutional Republic but does
>>>>>indeed
>>>>>have common law continuation from the British. but to be honest codified
>>>>>systems have other problems . But that is a different topic to historic
>>>>>laws
>>>>>still applying today. I believe I have shown that they do and in face
>>>>>PRECEDENT is all about this so Holocaust denial is not the only crime
>>>>>based
>>>>>on insisting and interpretation of history as true.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, there are indeed precedents for the holocaustT laws, but not in
>>>> the most recent two or three centuries. The Roman Church had a long
>>>> history of keeping its lies afloat by burning people at the stake,
>>>> poking their eyes out, or throwing them into dungeons, but even such
>>>> extreme measures were not able to suppress the truth forever.
>>>
>>>That is nonsence! the RC Church did very little in the way of this . the
>>>Inquisition in various guises lasted for about five hundred years. In that
>>>time at most thousands were executed by it. While I do not justify it
>>>compared to other acts from that time it isnt huge. for example the
>>>atheistic purge arising during the terror in one place in France (the
>>>Vendee) say the execution of more catholics then the entire five centuries
>>>of the Inquisition. Indeed the worst Inquisitions (Spanish and Portugese)
>>>targeted Jews. But it wasnt about "surpressing the truth" but more about
>>>rooting out heresy. And In the Spanish case it became totally corrupted
>>>because the Inquisitors took over the possessions and land of the person
>>>they accused - nothing to do even with a misguided notion of a conspiracy
>>>to
>>>surpress truth.
>>>
>>>again I suspect you wil produce NO FACTS about how many people were burned
>>>at the stake and in what years it happened in spite of your "long history"
>>>of doing it claim!
>>>
>>>So much for your claims about history standing on its own! I am a real
>>>revisionist. You are an interloper. you haven't a clue and it seems you
>>>don't want to learn either preferring your biased bigotry to informed
>>>opinion.
>>
>> There are no historical supports for your claim of "at most a few
>> thousand" victims of the witch hunts, heretic hunts, etc. of the
>> Church of Rome, probably the most evil institution ever to exist in
>> human history. I'm glad that Luther and the German Princes managed to
>> destroy its influence in Germany.
>
>first of all I made no such claim! Where did I? Indeed Witch finding and
>witch hunting becme a decidely Protestant diversion and not really a huge
>Roman Church preoccupation.
>The total number of witch trials in Europe which are known for certain to
>have ended in executions is around 12,000
>http://www.summerlands.com/crossroads/remembrance/current.htm
>Witch hunting was worst in central Europe: in Germany, Switzerland, and
>France. Generally speaking, the further you got away from this area, the
>less persecution there was. For example, Ireland, Portugal, and Russia all
>had less than a dozen executions.
>
>Nothing like the ten millions plus during the Holocaust!
You denier you! It was ten trillion if it was one.
>
>No go back and look at what you think I claimed. I mentioned the Inquisition
>and the worst of these by far was the Spanish one.
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Inquisition#Death_tolls
>The historian Hernando del Pulgar, contemporary of Ferdinand and Isabella,
>estimated that the Inquisition had burned at the stake 2,000 people.
>Henningsen-Contreras statistics for the period 1540-1700
>Executions reported (all areas from 1540 to 1700) = 826
>Least amount expected = 1080
>
>Thats 1,000 over 160 years about 7 a year on average!
>
>I dont justify it but compared to the Holocaust it is tiny in scale.
>
>AS regards the German Lutheran rooting out of Catholics... The most
>catholic country in the world per capita is Ireland. they had about 4
>witches executed. Germany had about 26,000 and many of these were in
>Protestant regions.
You pull these figures out of your fundament, do you? Germany was one
of the few countries where the inquisition did not take hold and where
it had little support.
>
>[snip]
>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In spite of saying all of history is a collection of "FACTS" that
>>>>>>>stand
>>>>>>>on
>>>>>>>their own you cant even cite three from the last 2500 years! Can you?
>>>>>
>>>>>evasion noted. In spie of saying everything else apart from the
>>>>>Holocaust
>>>>>stands on its own you can't cite three examples from the ennumerable
>>>>>ones
>>>>>in
>>>>>history!
>>>>>LOL!
>>>>>>>>
>[snip]
>
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:24 EDT 2009
Article: 2005813 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-06.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Demjanjuk: 29,000 murder charges. Mysterious ventilation at Krema II and III.
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <49cfd93e@news.x-privat.org> <49d67f8e@news.x-privat.org> <49d6919b$0$23449$9b536df3@news.fv.fi>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 28
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 08:57:42 -0400
Bytes: 2040
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005813
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 01:45:39 +0300, "Toivo Kottarainen"
wrote:
>
>"m-weber"
>wrote:gr5vcq$5js$1@pcls6.std.com...
>> In article <49d67f8e@news.x-privat.org>,
>> ZuLu <""zulu\"@cool rabbits.com"> wrote:
>>
>>
>> The holes are there:
>>
>> http://www.holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/holes/die-welt.shtml
>
>Yes. If the killers thought they could escape easy just by exploding the
>murder scene, they were wrong. Revisionism is starting to crumble.
On the contrary, it is the holocaust™ fable that had retreated into
darkest Poland, that is now in difficulties even there.
>
>Remembrance. Awareness. Responsibility
>
>Topi
>
>To get to know more about the true history of the Auschwitz camp visit
>http://en.auschwitz.org.pl/m/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=570&Itemid=29
>
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:25 EDT 2009
Article: 2005815 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-01.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Jesus tried to warn us about the Jews -"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lust of your father ye will do."
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID: <5bmet4do6kouo4mo8ri7c60puu77k3fr3u@4ax.com>
References: <49c2447f$0$30005$9b536df3@news.fv.fi> <9d722$49d1d539$596480f8$18987@news.upc.ie> <1qq4t41c7o2r9n0v9h33uph60bvnh8gmrf@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 446
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 09:00:50 -0400
Bytes: 21334
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005815
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 01:29:31 +0100, "Mavisbeacon"
wrote:
>
>"Johannes von Ebersdorf" wrote in message
>news:cc6at4ld09m0rjjtdd3q35hhieqoogdlni@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 15:22:10 +0100, "Mavisbeacon"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Johannes von Ebersdorf" wrote in message
>>>news:1qq4t41c7o2r9n0v9h33uph60bvnh8gmrf@4ax.com...
>>>> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:32:48 +0100, "Mavisbeacon"
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"B.H. Cramer" wrote in message
>>>>>news:CsmdnZPaZOVxpl7UnZ2dnVY3go2dnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>>>[snip]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jesus was a Jew himself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you sure about that? You can prove that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>The historicity of Jesus is an established field of research.
>>>>>But if anyone believes in Jesus Christ existing in the past then it is
>>>>>ludicrous to believe he was NOT a Jew.
>>>>>If one is claiming that Jesus Christ never existed then claiming he was
>>>>>or
>>>>>was not a Jew is pointless since one assigning an attribute to something
>>>>>which does not exist - a bit like saying the dragon was BLUE. It is
>>>>>pointless to argue about whether they are blue red or yellow if your
>>>>>main
>>>>>point is that dragons never existed.
>>>>>
>>>>>As it happens though the historicity of Jesus is as established (or
>>>>>probably
>>>>>more established) as say Alexander the Great for example.
>>>>
>>>> Actually no, since lots of people saw or experienced Alexander the
>>>> Great,
>>>
>>>Really?
>>>And your evidence is?
>>>Lots of people also saw and experienced Jesus by the way.
>>
>> Nonsense.
>
>
>With few exceptions (such as Robert M. Price), virtually all scholars in the
>fields of biblical studies
That is the whole point, Mavis. The scholars are "biblical scholars"
and sure, there are lots of scriptural references to Jesus. There are
zero historical references to his existence outside of scripture. Not
even the court records of the Roman governors in the Middle East have
any reference, and they really should if he were a real person.
> and history agree that Jesus was a Jewish teacher
>from Galilee who was regarded as a healer, was baptized by John the Baptist,
>was accused of sedition against the Roman Empire, and on the orders of Roman
>Governor Pontius Pilate was sentenced to death by crucifixion.
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus
> Raymond E. Brown, The Death of the Messiah: From Gethsemane to the Grave
>(New York: Doubleday, Anchor Bible Reference Library 1994), p. 964; D. A.
>Carson, et al., p. 50-56; Shaye J.D. Cohen, From the Maccabees to the
>Mishnah, Westminster Press, 1987, p. 78, 93, 105, 108; John Dominic Crossan,
>The Historical Jesus: The Life of a Mediterranean Jewish Peasant,
>HarperCollins, 1991, p. xi-xiii; Michael Grant, p. 34-35, 78, 166, 200;
>Paula Fredriksen, Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews, Alfred A. Knopf,
>1999, p. 6-7, 105-110, 232-234, 266; John P. Meier, vol. 1:68, 146, 199,
>278, 386, 2:726; E.P. Sanders, pp. 12-13; Geza Vermes, Jesus the Jew
>(Philadelphia: Fortress Press 1973), p. 37.; Paul L. Maier, In the Fullness
>of Time, Kregel, 1991, pp. 1, 99, 121, 171; N. T. Wright, The Meaning of
>Jesus: Two Visions, HarperCollins, 1998, pp. 32, 83, 100-102, 222; Ben
>Witherington III, pp. 12-20.
>
>>Jesus wrote nothing,
>He is recorded as having writing twice in the sand before he said "let him
>without sin cast the first stone".
>
>>built nothing,
>It would be unlikley if he was the son of a carpenter that he built nothing.
>
>>founded nothing,
>
>Eh. He is also recorded as saying "On this rock I found my Church" to Peter.
>
>>and
>> simply was not noticed by anybody other than the people who wrote the
>> scriptures.
>
>Your point being? Was "Ozymandias King of Kings" noticed? Look up "Sailing
>to Byzanthium".
>
>By the way it is also WRONG! Many people followed him who didn't write at
>all. Just as many people followed others in that time also. ever heard of
>simon Maguns , simon the magician? Or Barabbas?
>
>>
>>>What evidence do you have from "lots" of people? I am aware of at most
>>>maybe
>>>a dozen sources which can be traced to that time. and even THEY are not
>>>original extant sources. Most sources are from CENTURIES later. in fact I
>>>am
>>>only aware of maybe ONE or TWO artifacts which date from the time of
>>>alexander which may be construed as a reference to him.
>>
>> That is all crap. There are Persian records of Alexander's exploits,
>
>Really? Can you point me to a few of them? What Persian records exist of
>alexcander written at the time of Alexander the Great?
>Let us just get in the ball park here. Your claim is of existing writings
>from Persia between the years 340 and 323 BC.
>Ill bet you cant produce ONE!
>Where are these "Persian records"?
>
> > Indian records of Alexander's exploits,
>
>
>Where Cite please?
>
>>Egyptian records of
>>Alexander's exploits
>
>From before 323 BC I really think not! coite please! Can you?
>
>>and a whole trail of new Greek states and cities
>> in his wake.
>
>I don't deny the Greek Empire existed or that Greek Armies probably
>conquered the known world and persian Empire then but where are your
>"writings from the time" of which you claim there are "loads" in several
>countries? Where are the Persian, Indian, Egyptian records from the time of
>Alexander? Not copies from three centuries later but actual writings fromn
>the time? This isnt to say that copies from three centuries later referring
>to the now non existiant earlier work are to be dismissed altogether but
>that is NOT you claim is it?
>
>>It is extremely unlikely that all these different people
>> living in different societies were all stoned on pot at the same time
>> and saw hallucinations that were coordinated.
>
>first of all you have produced NO EVIDENCE from any writings of the time
>that you suggest!
>Second of all remember later when we come back to this that not alone do
>people exist but there are miles of reams of paper and photographs and other
>evidence of people from Italy to Russia to Holland to France who could not
>have "co ordinated" a mass Holocaust hallucination.
>>
>> Silly statements such as yours are one of the reasons that the term
>> "Christian" has become a synonym for "drooling imbecile".
>
>I am not surprised that when you utterly FAIL to produce ANY actual evidence
>of writings from Persia India and Egypt referring to "Alexander" the Great
>conquering Emporor, you resort to ad hominem! Please put up or shut up and
>provide example of the texts from 330 BC or thereabouts or just admit that
>you can't do it!
>
>
>>>
>>>>whereas the only references to Jesus are in the Christian
>>>> scriptures,
>>>
>>>WRONG! Roman historians wrote of him and others outsede of the accepted
>>>canon of Holy scriptures.
>>
>> Show me just ONE non scriptural reference to Jesus, and you will
>> become world famous, since you will be the only person ever to have
>> produced one.
>
>Outside the accepted canon of Holy Scriptures from heretical or non
>cononical writings:
>
>The authors whose works are contained in the New Testament sometimes quote
>from creeds, or confessions of faith, that obviously predate their writings.
>Scholars suppose that some of these creeds date to within a few years of
>Jesus' death, and were developed within the Christian community in
>Jerusalem.
> basic text is that of Oscar Cullmann, available in English in a translation
>by J. K. S. Reid titled, The Earliest Christian Confessions (London:
>Lutterworth, 1949)
>Jesus is a large factor in New Testament apocrypha, works excluded from the
>canon (Gnostic texts) as it developed because they were judged not to be
>inspired.
>
>Early Christian sources outside the New Testament also mention Jesus and
>details of his life. Important texts from the Apostolic Fathers are, to name
>just the most significant and ancient, Clement of Rome (c. 100),[33]
>Ignatius of Antioch (c. 107-110),[34] and Justin Martyr.[35]
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_to_the_Trallians
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_to_the_Smyrneans
>
>Papias of Hierapolis
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papias
>
>
>Quadratus of Athens
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratus_of_Athens
>
>
>Greco-Roman sources
>Passages relevant to Christianity in the works of four major non-Christian
>writers of the late 1st and early 2nd centuries - Josephus, Tacitus,
>Suetonius, and Pliny the Younger.
>Josephus' writings, which document John the Baptist, James the Just, and
>possibly also Jesus, are of the most interest to scholars dealing with the
>historicity of Jesus
>Josephus calls James "the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ."
>http://www.ccel.org/ccel/josephus/works/files/ant-20.htm
>Tacitus, in his Annals written c. 115, mentions popular opinion about
>Christus, without historical details
>According to Suetonius, chapter 25, there occurred in Rome, during the reign
>of emperor Claudius (circa AD 50), "persistent disturbances ... at the
>instigation of Chrestus"
>
>
>Thallus, of whom very little is known, wrote a history from the Trojan War
>to, according to Eusebius, 109 BC. No work of Thallus survives. There is one
>reference to Thallus having written about events beyond 109 BC. Julius
>Africanus, writing c. 221, while writing about the crucifixion of Jesus,
>mentioned Thallus. Thus:
>On the whole world there pressed a most fearful darkness; and the rocks were
>rent by an earthquake, and many places in Judea and other districts were
>thrown down. This darkness Thallus, in his third book of History, calls (as
>appears to me without reason) an eclipse of the sun.
>Julius Africanus, Extant Writings XVIII in Ante-Nicene Fathers, ed. A.
>Roberts and J. Donaldson (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1973) vol. VI, p. 130
>Lucian, a second century Romano-Syrian satirist, who wrote in Greek, wrote:
>The Christians, you know, worship a man to this day - the distinguished
>personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that
>account. You see, these misguided creatures start with the general
>conviction that they are immortal for all time, which explains the contempt
>of death and voluntary self-devotion which are so common among them; and
>then it was impressed on them by their original lawgiver that they are all
>brothers, from the moment that they are converted, and deny the gods of
>Greece, and worship the crucified sage, and live after his laws
>Lucian, The Death of Peregrine, 11-13 in The Works of Lucian of Samosata,
>translated by H. W. Fowler (Oxford: Clarendon, 1949) vol. 4
>
>Celsus wrote, about 180AD, a book against the Christians, which is now only
>known through Origen's refutation of it. Celsus apparently accused Jesus of
>being a child and a sorcerer Morton Smith, Jesus the Magician: Charlatan or
>Son of God? (1978) pp. 78-79.
>
>ther are Jewish records too but we ell skip them for now
>
>In The Historical Figure of Jesus, E.P. Sanders used Alexander the Great as
>a paradigm-the available sources tell us much about Alexander's deeds, but
>nothing about his thoughts. "The sources for Jesus are better, however, than
>those that deal with Alexander" and "the superiority of evidence for Jesus
>is seen when we ask what he thought."
>
>Actually I am reminded of Sanders comparison between jesus and alexander
>now. But more so the idea of the difference between Modern and Ancient
>history. Paul Barnett respected classicist and historian - "scholars of
>ancient history have always recognized the 'subjectivity' factor in their
>available sources" and "have so few sources available compared to their
>modern counterparts that they will gladly seize whatever scraps of
>information that are at hand." IN "Is the New Testament History?", p.1.
>
>
>>
>>> But my poiint is that people accepted Jesus
>>>existed (whether or not he was God).
>>
>> Religious folks accept all manner of stuff without evidence or proof.
>
>Which is WHY a specifically seperated the religious belief element from the
>field of history.
>
>> That is the nature of a religion.
>
>Well as you seem to have as scant a knowledge of theology as you have of
>historical scholarship I won't bother to go into detail on the idea of
>"evidence" or "proof" in theological terms since you seem not to have nay of
>your so called "evidence" of "loads" of texts about alexander from the time
>of alexander.
>
>>
>>
>>> few say he didnt.
>>
>> The bulk of the world's people would dispute the divinity of Christ,
>> and even a few Christians.
>
>I note you seem to have ignored or not paid attention to my last comment.
>Please try to keep up! My poiint is that people accepted Jesus
>existed (whether or not he was God). the divinity of Christ isn't the
>subject! the historicity of Jesus is. and it is in so far as it can be
>compared withthe historicity of alexander. But the existance of Socrates or
>alexander in history has scant evidence in comparison to the WWII Holocaust
>yet you sem to believe in it in spite of CLAIMING but producing NO evidence
>for alexander!
>
>>
>>>More however seem to
>>>think the Holocaust which has loads more evidence didn't happen.
>>
>> Show me some physical evidence that will stand up to scientific
>> scrutiny for the "jumping buckets of flesh" stories, or the
>> "flame-belching crematoria".
>
>This would be like your "physical evidence" of "persian texts" or "Egyptian
>texts" or "indian texts" would it?
>Im still waiting for them by the way.
>Where are they?
>
>
>>Obviously there actually WAS a
>> significant death toll among Jews, but that isn't quite the same thing
>> as uncritically and naively accepting every ridiculous fable that is
>> in circulation about that period.
>
>Yeah but yu accept the existance of alexander the Great and socrates in
>spite of producing NO TEXTS whatsoever from the time of alexander or
>Socrates. Apparently was thought by aristotle who was taught by Plato who
>was taught by Socrates. But I dont see any evidence from you of ANYTHING
>from Socrates. Probably because no texts ever existed! So how doyou know he
>did? Or do you just "believe" Alexander and Socrates existed like you claim
>religious people do? LOL!
>
>>
>>>
>>>>all written at least a century after the traditional date
>>>> of the crucifixion.
>>>
>>>Not necessarily true. some may be first century. Certainly the second
>>>century stuff refers to the earlier works of which people do not have
>>>whole
>>>copies. But what about Alexander the Great? The things written about him
>>>are from books at least THREE centuries later! not ONE but THREE!
>>
>> There was much material written about Alexander DURING his lifetime,
>
>REally? And you have a copy or can point to some of this can you?
>I can point to PLENTY of stuff written about Jesus DURING HIS lifetime or by
>people who were around when he was.
>LOADS of it! Where are YOUR writings?
>
>> especially by his Persian and Greek enemies.
>
>REally? WHAT Persian and Greek writings can you point to?
>
>>Those count as
>> independent verification because they were not penned by followers and
>> lackeys of the person under consideration.
>
>How about gnostic heretics, Jews and pagan historians all of whom are in
>addition to the Christian writers?
>How about testimony penned by Nazis who were certainly not Jewish lackeys?
>
>
>>>
>>>>There is no independent verification of Christ's
>>>> existence, whereas there are plentiful references to Alexander the
>>>> Great,
>>>
>>>Really? Suppose you produce say five or six of these "plentiful"
>>>references.
>>
>> Good Lord, woman, go into any library and there are still plentiful
>> references to Alexander,
>
>LOL! You say you have them and the libraries are full of them but you cant
>produce ONE from the time of alexander! What a joke! You claim the Holocaust
>didnt happen and stuff might have been made up later but when asked to
>produce something about alexander or Socrates you ignore the standards you
>claim to have!
>
>Libraries are full of references to the Holocaust but somehow thisis to be
>ignored while references to alexander aren't! HHypocritical double standards
>is all you seem to have produced to support YOUR CLAIM about Alexander! LOL!
>
>
>>despite the campaign of the Church of Rome to
>> have all records of antiquity destroyed.
>
>LOL! How ignorant you are. where did you get this one from? You have a Di
>vinci code version of history it seems.
>
>Now you are probably going to come up with the Library of Alexandria fire so
>Ill put you straight on a few things first.
>
>First the Library was STLL THERE when burned down by THE MUSLIMS.
>Second when the earlier fire happened it was well past its height by about
>150 years and much of the works had been copied.
>Third in early christian time it was under Constantinople i.e the Orthodox
>church and NOT the Roman Church!
>
>>
>>>Ill bet you cant produce one because I have studied the field
>>
>> If that is the case, then it wasn't much of an educational
>> institution.
>
>I didnt say I attended any educational institution did I? nor did I claim
>any qualification . that isnt to say I dont have qualifications. I said I
>personally studied this historicity of Jesus and Alexander field and was
>surprised at the dearth of writings on alexander. As I stated ther is to my
>knowledge only ONE partial fragment of something from persia which MAY refer
>(does not use the name Alexander) to Alexander. There are not to my
>knowledge libraries of writings from the time. there are even scant copies
>of later writings referring to earlier now lost books. but what I claim isnt
>the subject . YOUR CLAIM about loads of writings about alexander from the
>time of alexander is the subject. so where are they?
>
>LOL! You cant produce even ONE!
>
>>
>>> and I expect
>>>you wont find a SINGLE reference! go on produce five of these "plenty" can
>>>you?
>>>
>>>>especially since Alexander overthrew a lot of existing states
>>>> and founded a number of cities.
>>>
>>>Did he? and you know that because? You seem to believe it without seeing
>>>ANY
>>>evidence! Yet whenh it comes to the holocaust you doubt all the loads of
>>>evidence. why dont you apply even a tiny amount of that doubt for
>>>Alexander
>>>for whom you have seen no extant evidence?
>>>
>>>Mind you all the more reason to be amazed at the son of a Carpenter being
>>>remembered MORE then and written MORE about than the Greatest General in
>>>history and the conquerer of the world at the time!
>>
>> Most of the Bible stories come under the heading of fables,
>
>I was not referring only to Bible stories. I have provided you with non
>Bible stories. contemporary historians and other writers writing about the
>period foom the century after Jesus. You have not provided ONE reference of
>your loads of Persian Indian Egyptian and Greek writings claim.
>
>>and cannot
>> be confused with history. All human religions, including yours,
>> consist of fables and legends. They all have the same validity.
>
>Nope they dont. all history is an interpretation. But we can use several
>sources to link certain events together and distill out the likely history.
>But yuy have not provided several sources for alexander . You have not
>provided ONE! Yet you claim Alexander existed ? So why dont you apply the
>same reasoning to the Holocaust? Why the double standards?
>
>
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:26 EDT 2009
Article: 2005817 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: not to debate a holo denier
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID: <82net4lanibo1inu7s2u6litrv1i85ms1b@4ax.com>
References: <73m2dpFv1ianU1@mid.individual.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 66
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 09:11:53 -0400
Bytes: 3944
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005817
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 11:15:37 +0200, "Heinrich"
wrote:
> spoke by telephone today to the person who answered the line when I asked
>for the Dir of Research. I believe it is Bret Brietback or some name very
>close to that.
>
>I directed my questions to Treblinka and specifiically, where are all the
>burnt bodies, estimated BY HIM, to be 850,000- 900,000.
>
>I was told they are bascially scattered all over the place. In fact, if you
>go there, I was told, you can just put your hand into the soil and pull up
>bones! WTF, is this guy for real.
>
>I asked how was it the Germans could burn 850,000 ( 3000 per day) bodies in
>temps that sometimes came close to -30 F and without wood or gasoline or
>cremation ovens.
>
>
>Mr BB told me the Germans had a method to do it, it was not easy, but they
>pulled it off, and he suggested a book written by a lady, whose name I did
>not record.
>
>I asked if it would have been easier if they had asked for a few ovens, and
>he said he was not going to argue the point. It appears Treblinka was about
>200 miles from Auschwitz, so it would not have been a huge deal to provide a
>few.
>
>I then asked about the testimony of Abraham Bomba. A Jew who spent time in
>Treblinka as a barber?
>I told Mr BB that Bomba is on record as saying he cut hair for the ladies
>who were to be gassed and was one of 16 barbers in a 12x 12 room with 140
>others.
>
>This was a bigger nut to crack for Mr BB, so he told me I should not listen
>to the words of ONE man since so many others also have stories about
>Treblinka. I said ,BUT he was THERE. He said time can fade memories and he
>was not going to argue the point.
>
>I then introduced to Mr BB, my past conversations with Dr. Michael Singer, a
>Rabbi and Holocaust professor at Notre Dame.
>
>I told Mr BB that Dr. Singer said the remains were in the nearby hills, but
>the land near Treblinka is flat. How can you reconcile that? He said I do
>not know Dr. Singer.
>
>My last point to him was the area around Treblinka was farms and the camp
>was in the open without any walls to keep it secret. In fact, there was even
>bartering in the front of the camp with locals, and the US Air Force
>overflights show no mass graves or long lines or thousands being roasted on
>railroad tyees. How can you explain your side when the evidence suggests
>otherwise.
>
>Ready for this...................He said the Germans bought up huge tracts
>of land next to Treblinka so the locals could not see what was happening
>inside Treblinka. WTF. Yeah, I am sure that is how you keep a camp secret.
>
>Do not build walls, just buy up the land next to the camp.
>
>He then got mad and said I am not going to debate a holocaust denier and
>hung up.
>_________________
The person you spoke to could have been olde gourd. If you challenge
the hurricane of gobbledegook, you get called names and the
conversation is terminated. LOL
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:26 EDT 2009
Article: 2005818 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-06.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Massengrab mit 4.500 Soldaten entdeckt
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <49d6235a$0$21352$91cee783@newsreader01.highway.telekom.at> <71qBl.19804$Db2.13881@edtnps83> <49d63a8e$0$3495$9b536df3@news.fv.fi>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 26
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 09:17:00 -0400
Bytes: 2070
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005818
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 19:34:14 +0300, "Toivo Kottarainen"
wrote:
>
>"Truthseeker" wrote:71qBl.19804$Db2.13881@edtnps83...
>> Ist ja schon ganz interessant. Immer liest man so was die deutschen
>> gemacht haben, In Kroatien oder Jugoslawien hatten die Partisanen deutsche
>> gefangen in einer Hölle eingemauert und verrecken lassen. Als die
>> deutschen dieses Gebiet zurück eroberten haben sie dann die Partisanen
>> umgebracht. man kann immer nur hören was die deutschen gemacht haben aber
>> was die andern gemacht haben wird verschwiegen.
>> Kurt Knoll.
>>
>And what hell hell were the Germans doing there ? Were they invited? Some
>might think they got what they deserved.
The Americans were not invited to any of the scores of countries they
have occupied either, so what is your point?
Some might also think that the partisans got what they deserved.
According to the various conventions, shooting partisans is perfectly
acceptable.
>
>Topi
>
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:27 EDT 2009
Article: 2005819 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-01.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Massengrab mit 4.500 Soldaten entdeckt
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <49d6235a$0$21352$91cee783@newsreader01.highway.telekom.at> <71qBl.19804$Db2.13881@edtnps83> <49d63a8e$0$3495$9b536df3@news.fv.fi> <49d6401d$0$3480$9b536df3@news.fv.fi>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 27
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 09:19:00 -0400
Bytes: 1977
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005819
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 19:57:58 +0300, "Toivo Kottarainen"
wrote:
>
>"Bertram.Zetzsche" wrote gr5e7i$h4c$1@aioe.org...
>>
>> "Toivo Kottarainen" schrieb
>>
>>> And what hell hell were the Germans doing there ?
>>
>> The same like the US and GB in all over the world!
>Yes but they are not crying afterwards how maltreated they were.
You've got to be kidding! There are no whiners like American whiners.
>I once saw
>a documentary filmed in late nineties in Volgograd. A group of German
>tourists wanted to know why there wasn´t a memorial for the fallen german
>soldiers. The Russian guide was about to faint. I can hardly imagine a
>bigger insult to the local inhabitants.
The Russians make any German military units look like Sunday school
pupils.
>
>Topi
>
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:27 EDT 2009
Article: 2005820 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Massengrab mit 4.500 Soldaten entdeckt
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <49d6235a$0$21352$91cee783@newsreader01.highway.telekom.at> <71qBl.19804$Db2.13881@edtnps83> <49d63a8e$0$3495$9b536df3@news.fv.fi> <49d6401d$0$3480$9b536df3@news.fv.fi>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 09:20:15 -0400
Bytes: 2214
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005820
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:27:52 GMT, "Truthseeker"
wrote:
>An educated brain compares both sites and I am not so sure if your brain
>works at all.
Indeed! Toivo is obviously an allied apologist, so for him, all allied
crimes are either excusable or understandable.
>Kurt Knoll.
>
>"Toivo Kottarainen" wrote in message
>news:49d6401d$0$3480$9b536df3@news.fv.fi...
>>
>> "Bertram.Zetzsche" wrote
>> gr5e7i$h4c$1@aioe.org...
>>>
>>> "Toivo Kottarainen" schrieb
>>>
>>>> And what hell hell were the Germans doing there ?
>>>
>>> The same like the US and GB in all over the world!
>> Yes but they are not crying afterwards how maltreated they were. I once
>> saw a documentary filmed in late nineties in Volgograd. A group of German
>> tourists wanted to know why there wasn´t a memorial for the fallen german
>> soldiers. The Russian guide was about to faint. I can hardly imagine a
>> bigger insult to the local inhabitants.
>>
>> Topi
>>
>
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:28 EDT 2009
Article: 2005821 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-09.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Massengrab mit 4.500 Soldaten entdeckt
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID: <1lnet4lo96ffgh62m928olr266dbjl1rb2@4ax.com>
References: <49d6235a$0$21352$91cee783@newsreader01.highway.telekom.at> <71qBl.19804$Db2.13881@edtnps83> <49d63a8e$0$3495$9b536df3@news.fv.fi> <49d6401d$0$3480$9b536df3@news.fv.fi>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 16
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 09:21:41 -0400
Bytes: 1683
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005821
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:44:32 +0200, "T. Fink" wrote:
>Truthseeker wrote:
>> An educated brain compares both sites and I am not so sure if your brain
>> works at all.
>> Kurt Knoll.
>
>Knoll, you are really the last person that should use the word "educated".
>
>Cheers
>
>Torsten
Torsten, Churchill was a demented war-lover who helped launch both WW1
and WW2, destroying the British Empire in the process. Destroying the
British Empire was probably his one valuable achievement.
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:28 EDT 2009
Article: 2005822 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-06.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Massengrab mit 4.500 Soldaten entdeckt
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID: <3pnet4t3u3um92p6bl0pmij716b77tijls@4ax.com>
References: <49d6235a$0$21352$91cee783@newsreader01.highway.telekom.at> <71qBl.19804$Db2.13881@edtnps83> <49d63a8e$0$3495$9b536df3@news.fv.fi> <49d67027$0$23470$9b536df3@news.fv.fi>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 38
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 09:25:07 -0400
Bytes: 3061
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005822
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 23:22:44 +0300, "Toivo Kottarainen"
wrote:
>
>"Truthseeker" wrotexErBl.21309$PH1.8475@edtnps82...
>> If you would have more brain you could figure it out. Not just the Germans
>> but also the Americans , British and Russian did have the principle to cut
>> of the supply of raw material for the enemies. A typical example her is
>> Norway. The British and Germans did the same thing but it was the British
>> who cam late and then did return. The we have the supply of Oil which both
>> the German needed was in Africa. And the fight was not about conquering
>> Africa but to stop the other site from getting it. Politics is like a
>> religion and a lot of people can be brain washed with it. In this sense
>> hallelujah fuckers are no different then people that believe only in one
>> sited politics.
>> Kurt Knoll.
>>
>Lebenraum is it? Did the German people really need moore land? Was it
>somebodys elses land? Oil? Was it somebodys elses oil? Till 1941 the Reich
>had a deal with Soviet Union to get wheat and fuel as much it wanted. The
>usual way to get raw materials is to buy them, not to conquer those lands
>and steel them.. And what has Norway to do with it, in those days they
>producded nothingh but cod.
Toivo, the British were on their way to violate Norway's neutrality
but were pre-empted by a German naval force just a few hours earlier.
Neither action had anything to do with cod, as you ridiculously
suggest, but with the iron ore rail link that goes from the mines in
Sweden to the Norwegian port of Narvik.
>
>It was crazy Hitlers paranaid idea to attac all around him not to get anyone
>ahead of him. It had been better without the Nazis as we can see now. How
>rich, mighgty, prosperous, united and wellbeing Deutchland we had seen
>without the disaster of the Nazi era and without the war.
>
>Topi
>
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:28 EDT 2009
Article: 2005823 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-07.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Massengrab mit 4.500 Soldaten entdeckt
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <49d6235a$0$21352$91cee783@newsreader01.highway.telekom.at> <71qBl.19804$Db2.13881@edtnps83> <49d63a8e$0$3495$9b536df3@news.fv.fi> <35a5742b-f62f-4f45-b6cb-709e0b93d55c@q16g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 30
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 09:27:17 -0400
Bytes: 2521
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005823
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 14:19:03 -0700 (PDT), "Bent Attorney Esq."
wrote:
>On Apr 3, 12:34 pm, "Toivo Kottarainen"
>wrote:
>> "Truthseeker" wrote:71qBl.19804$Db2.13881@edtnps83...
>> > Ist ja schon ganz interessant. Immer liest man so was die deutschen
>> > gemacht haben, In Kroatien oder Jugoslawien hatten die Partisanen deutsche
>> > gefangen in einer Hölle eingemauert und verrecken lassen. Als die
>> > deutschen dieses Gebiet zurück eroberten haben sie dann die Partisanen
>> > umgebracht. man kann immer nur hören was die deutschen gemacht haben aber
>> > was die andern gemacht haben wird verschwiegen.
>> > Kurt Knoll.
>>
>> And what hell hell were the Germans doing there ? Were they invited? Some
>> might think they got what they deserved.
>>
>> Topi
>
>Do you think that German troops should have been torture/killed? I've
>also heard that German troops were planted in the ground (in
>Yugoslavia) and then a plow ran over them; their heads were sticking
>out. If you OK that atrocity or any atrocities against German troops,
>then you OK all atrocities. Why should one set of atrocities be OK,
>and not another?
Apologists for allied crimes tend to be two-faced. If something is
done by Germans, it is a crime, but similar things done by the allies
are perfectly acceptable, by definition.
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:29 EDT 2009
Article: 2005824 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-02.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Massengrab mit 4.500 Soldaten entdeckt
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <49d6235a$0$21352$91cee783@newsreader01.highway.telekom.at> <71qBl.19804$Db2.13881@edtnps83> <49d63a8e$0$3495$9b536df3@news.fv.fi> <35a5742b-f62f-4f45-b6cb-709e0b93d55c@q16g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> <49d68c16$0$23526$9b536df3@news.fv.fi>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 35
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 09:29:50 -0400
Bytes: 2448
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005824
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 01:19:38 +0300, "Toivo Kottarainen"
wrote:
>
>"Bent Attorney Esq." kirjoitti
>viestissä:35a5742b-f62f-4f45-b6cb-709e0b93d55c@q16g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...
>On Apr 3, 12:34 pm, "Toivo Kottarainen"
>wrote:
>
>>
>> And what hell hell were the Germans doing there ? Were they invited? Some
>> might think they got what they deserved.
>>
>> Topi
>
>Do you think that German troops should have been torture/killed? I've
>also heard that German troops were planted in the ground (in
>Yugoslavia) and then a plow ran over them; their heads were sticking
>out. If you OK that atrocity or any atrocities against German troops,
>then you OK all atrocities. Why should one set of atrocities be OK,
>and not another?
>
>I repeat: What the hell the German troups were doing out there to get killed
>and tortured. Why didn´t they stay at home in Mannheim or in Wurttenberg or
>where ever they came from. Instead of getting ploughed over they could have
>got a nice family with a dozen kids, a Mercedes and a house with a garden.
>
>They were there to commit atrocities.
Nonsense. They were there to assist the Croats against the murderous
Communist Serbs.
>
>Topi
>
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:29 EDT 2009
Article: 2005825 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-06.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Massengrab mit 4.500 Soldaten entdeckt
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID: <57oet49n8qvvp0os4lpfen9phvo1ei9aln@4ax.com>
References: <49d6235a$0$21352$91cee783@newsreader01.highway.telekom.at> <71qBl.19804$Db2.13881@edtnps83> <49d63a8e$0$3495$9b536df3@news.fv.fi> <35a5742b-f62f-4f45-b6cb-709e0b93d55c@q16g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> <49d68c16$0$23526$9b536df3@news.fv.fi> <6a7428e0-259b-46c8-a4e5-50974e2e7e3d@3g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 41
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 09:30:56 -0400
Bytes: 3034
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005825
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 17:33:12 -0700 (PDT), "Bent Attorney Esq."
wrote:
>On Apr 3, 6:19 pm, "Toivo Kottarainen"
>wrote:
>> "Bent Attorney Esq." kirjoitti
>> viestissä:35a5742b-f62f-4f45-b6cb-709e0b93d...@q16g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...
>> On Apr 3, 12:34 pm, "Toivo Kottarainen"
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > And what hell hell were the Germans doing there ? Were they invited? Some
>> > might think they got what they deserved.
>>
>> > Topi
>>
>> Do you think that German troops should have been torture/killed? I've
>> also heard that German troops were planted in the ground (in
>> Yugoslavia) and then a plow ran over them; their heads were sticking
>> out. If you OK that atrocity or any atrocities against German troops,
>> then you OK all atrocities. Why should one set of atrocities be OK,
>> and not another?
>>
>> I repeat: What the hell the German troups were doing out there to get killed
>> and tortured. Why didn´t they stay at home in Mannheim or in Wurttenberg or
>> where ever they came from. Instead of getting ploughed over they could have
>> got a nice family with a dozen kids, a Mercedes and a house with a garden.
>>
>> They were there to commit atrocities.
>>
>> Topi
>
>So stop crying when your side gets tortured or killed. If you believe
>that atrocities are OK, then you believe that atrocities are OK. You
>obviously believe then; according to your logic; you believe that Jews
>should have been brutalized yes? No? Why is that different than
>honorable troops having their heads plowed? Never mind. You're an
>idiot; that much is clear. And a hateful idiot to boot.
Topi has severe tunnel vision, so Serb butcheries are acceptable.
From ebersdorf@gmail.com Fri Apr 10 17:51:30 EDT 2009
Article: 2005826 of alt.revisionism
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johannes von Ebersdorf
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Massengrab mit 4.500 Soldaten entdeckt
Reply-To: ebersdorf@gmail.com
Message-ID:
References: <49d6235a$0$21352$91cee783@newsreader01.highway.telekom.at> <71qBl.19804$Db2.13881@edtnps83> <49d63a8e$0$3495$9b536df3@news.fv.fi> <35a5742b-f62f-4f45-b6cb-709e0b93d55c@q16g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> <49d68c16$0$23526$9b536df3@news.fv.fi>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 45
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 09:31:52 -0400
Bytes: 2801
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.revisionism:2005826
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 01:14:59 GMT, "Truthseeker"
wrote:
>
>"Toivo Kottarainen" wrote in message
>news:49d68c16$0$23526$9b536df3@news.fv.fi...
>>
>> "Bent Attorney Esq." kirjoitti
>> viestissä:35a5742b-f62f-4f45-b6cb-709e0b93d55c@q16g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...
>> On Apr 3, 12:34 pm, "Toivo Kottarainen"